You know what's heartbreaking? Some of these people were responsible for my reversion to the church. Now they are leading people to hell. How very sad.
Can you explain to me the most glaring heresy "these people" are spreading? I need specifics from you as my soul is at risk. Please help and respond clearly to my question.
What is interesting to me is that for 60 years I WAS NOT CATECHISED. I would have bought into the Viganos and the Marshells but I dove into the Catechism and the true teachings. We are subjetcts in the "Kingdom" that Jesus established on earth until we go home to him.
Sorry but no. Sadly, and I do mean sorrowfully Catholicism ( the church of Jesus Christ, and His Apostle’s) would always echo the words of the first Pope. I am certain that all would agree with the words of St. Peter, and require zero influence of interpretation. The second epistle of St.Peter chapter 2 reads, and I quote” But there were also false prophets among the people, even as there shall be among you lying teachers, who shall bring in sects of perdition, and deny the Lord who bought them: bringing upon themselves swift destruction. 2. And many shall follow their riotousnesses, through whom the way of truth shall be evil spoken of. 3. And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you. Whose judgment now of a long time lingereth not, and their perdition slumbereth not. 4. For God spared not the angels that sinned, but delivered them, drawn down by infernal ropes to the lower hell, unto torments, to be reserved unto judgment.” Have any of you watched the videos on you tube, part 1-3 entitled Our Lady Of Good Success?
All of these politics are way above my pay grade. So I’m just going to dive into my Bible and Catechism and leave all this up to people much smarter than me. Long live our beautiful Catholic and Apostolic Church. I bid you all peace.
All I hear from these dissenters is self-righteousness & arrogance, all from pride. I don’t listen to them at all now. I don’t want to give them the clicks, not even to correct error. I really appreciate your podcast. I love that you stay focused on what’s important, love of God & others, pro-life, obedience to the Magisterium, etc. Thank you.🙏❤️
Can you explain to me the most glaring heresy traditionalists are spreading? I need specifics from you as my soul is at risk. Please help and respond clearly to my question.
@@alexh2262 To put it simply, they don’t accept the authority of the Magisterium in one degree or another. Listening to them will eventually lead to sedevacanists, believing there is no Pope, to leaving the Church all together as Vigano has done.
@@TrixRNanybody that takes the sedevacantist position does not understand. It is an untenable position. It is our duty to question positions that are against the faith. Read Bellarmine
@@bobtosi9346 We absolutely should. The entire deposit of faith should be re-examined in light of the fact that some Catholics are saying that error has been taught since 2013, or 1962, or 1958. Because it is unlikely that the smoke of satan has only entered the Church in 20th/21st Centuries. All doctrines and practices of the Church should be tested against the purity and truth of the Gospels. Those that fail the test shpuld be ditched as garbage, however dear they may be to us. Ave Maria.
Taylor Marshall is probably already automatically excommunicated by saying that V2 taught heresy. He also said that vigano may not be validly excommunicated despite the ruling of the magisterium.
@@CatholicSaintsAndAngels Can you explain to me the most glaring heresy Taylor Marshall is spreading? I need specifics from you as my soul is at risk. Please help and respond clearly to my question.
@alexh2262 They're wrong. Taylor Marshall is not spreading heresy. He has stated multiple times that he believes Pope Francis is the pope. None of us, including Vigano can declare the pope as not being the pope. The only one who can declare that is a future pope, which Taylor Marshall has said many times. And being critical of Pope Francis doesn't mean you don't believe he's pope. Pope Francis is currently, in my opinion, not a good pope and causing mass confusion in the church. But despite that, I believe he is the Pope, and so we must pray.
a study from italy shows peoples life expentancy is down 37%, and the pope advised people to do that thing and the vatican made a commenorative coin to celebrate it
Seen the- It's Okay -video yet? Why does the CC tolerate the fact that these evils contributed to the research and development of all immortal cell lines and encompasses tests from them that generated the last experimental inoculation?
"I'm not rejecting the authority of the Pope there are some people and you're going to see it who because they disagree with the Pope on a particular instance they consider the pope a heretic they consider the pope illegitimate or because they they feel that the pope has has taught some some error in one area that they can reject everything that he says and does now." Actually Pope Paul IV establishes that in Cum Ex Apostolatus Officio, so on what authority you ask, the same authority you claim Francis to have. Pius X officially introduced papal infallibility just over a century ago and it never allowed sin or heresy. Francis is well outside of his authority. "The question becomes who are you to say the pope is wrong in this area or this area or this area who are you so that's just a question unto itself." Just a sinful Catholic that can read. "Is the pope suppressing the Latin Mass immoral? Is it immoral, I dare say you can't make that case that it's immoral do I believe it's it's wrong yes." What is the difference between wrong and immoral? "I believe that we should have more masses not fewer masses I believe that the Latin Mass should be available for those people who want to indulge themselves in that mass as they would any other right it could be a particular right of the church as the Byzantine malachite right right different rights in the church so I disagree with the Pope on him suppressing that..." If that were the case you would make an official complaint, words of sympathy here are mere placeholders for inaction, staked further into the heart of the issue in the next few sentences. "But is it immoral for him to suppress it, what about the binding and loosing power of the church? I this is one thing we never hear about from Taylor Marshall and John Henry Weston and Stein and Matt." Regardless of morals he can not do it. Stay on topic, not only did you not need to direct your weapon towards your own teammates, you certainly didn't need to fire that many times, but you did. I pray for all of our sakes that most of the clergy is nowhere near this petty. "The Binding loosing power of the church you're telling me that the church the Pope the papacy does not have the power to change the Liturgy." Yes, full stop, I am telling you the pope has no authority to change the Latin rite, pope Pius V in Quo Primum explicitly stated that. "as long the words of consecration are not changed, and even then even then if they say these are the sacred words of Consecration and that you are to do these couple of things say these words and perform these acts at the Consecration and then indeed The Bread and Wine will become the body and blood of Christ if the church deemed that and you disagreed with it for whatever reason, who are you to disagree with the binding and losing power of the church?" I had to go to the transcript and make sure you said what I thought you said, that was nonsense. Let me counter with a very simple question to test your logic. If the church deemed that sin was allowed, including murder, and you disagree with it for whatever reason, who are you to disagree with the binding and loosing power of the church? "I I I don't understand this!" I could tell. Either Paul IV, and Pius V combined have less authority than Francis in your mind? Or does the Holy spirit just get bored and change it's mind after a while? Genuinely curious. Either way, yes heresy is possible from the pope. Clearly catechesis is a big problem, and I sincerely thank everyone you disparaged in this video for defending the Catholic faith. I pray that more people learn and defend the faith well, and that the next pontiff repairs the rifts in the Church that Francis and his ilk created. I may not agree 100% with Vigano, but he is far from the one who has to humble himself and swallow his pride.
I don't understand what you mean by Traditionalism is Protestantism. 'The Deposit of Faith and the Tradition' is that which the Pope and the Magisterium must defend. .
@bobtosi9346 Your lack of knowledge absolves you from some responsibility - but not all. traditionalism is a new head which has emerged from the neck of the beast. It is protestantism under a new guise.
The battle in Heaven, Lucifer's rebellion against God is about disobedience and pride. The coming of our Lord is to restore obedience and humility. Vigano demonstrates he openly embraces pride and disobedience. Who you gas chosen to be a guide of your faith? Listen to this good priest talking.
The enemies of the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church used Obedience as a reason to persecute those faithful shepherds who courageously speaks the Truth, and charge them of disobedience, and schisms. "Blind guide who guides the blind will both fall into the ditch." Many Cardinals and Bishops who are spiritually asleep and spiritually blind are indifferent and coward, just keep silent in all the errors, heresies, and lies are guilty of the "Sin of Ommission." They blindly obey and blindly follow those apostates that dictates them who occupied in Vatican without thinking what is right and what is wrong. Wake-up! They are like Pontius Pilate who is indifferent and coward, who washed his hands and handed Jesus Christ to the people to be crucified on the Cross. These modern pharisees in Vatican are deceiving many people of their hypocrisy. Faithful Bishop Vigano who courageously speaks the Truth is a victim of injustice and persecution from within. They allowed the Pride blasphemous satanic mass of the LGBTQ, but restricted the Traditional Latin Holy Mass. You call evil to the righteous, but call good to evil men?
Vigano, the faithful bishop who, as Papal Nuncio to the US, refused to investigate the accusations against McCarrick, when he was instructed to do so by Cardinal Ouellet, Prefect of the Congregation for Bishops.
Comes down to Trusting Our Lord Jesus Christ fully (or not fully trusting in many cases) and it's where we're at....Wheat and Tares....oldest story in humanity, the desire to become our own gods and making idols of others....and decide on our Truths etc....as Christ told us...Do not be anxious about your life....
I can't listen to this "priest" who thinks the pope is Christ - the pope in NOT Christ, in fact the current pope renounces the title "Vicar of Christ". The current pope has no authority if he doesn't consider himself the Vicar of Christ.
@@dominiquedominique8395 well 1/st of all I never said he was Christ. 2nd he did not reject the title Vicar of Christ. Obviously you have a problem processing info or with the truth. It is fine if you can’t listen to me. They could listen to my namesake either.
Fr- with all do respect, Pope Francis did indeed reject the title, “Vicar of Christ”, relegating it officially to a “historical title” as listed in the Pontifical Yearbook 2020, published on March 25 that year. Look it up, it’s prominently found with a simple Google search.
@@a.t.c.3862 both yourself and Fr. misunderstood my comment - my point was that we must obey Christ, not the pope when he is preaching false gospels - we will know them by their fruits and the current pope is producing nothing but LGBT and global vaccines.
Vigano should swallow his pride and admit he’s wrong. You’re so right that we don’t know the whole story . My guess is he’s been counseled a few times and maybe in his stubbornness doesn’t want to obey. I am a product of Catholic schooling in the fifties and we learned that the only time the Pope was infallible was when he spoke ex cathedra. Whether we like him or not is immaterial as he’s head of the Church here on earth. I’m pretty sure too as you once said that we won’t be asked at our judgment what we thought of the Pope. I also wonder if Vigano remembers good priests were sometimes silenced by the Pope but they were obedient and didn’t infer that perhaps they weren’t validly elected.
Your first sentence states that Vigano should admit that he's wrong. Your second sentence is that we don't know the whole story. Kind of a contradiction to your point, isn't it?
@@alexh2262 Not really. As Father stated, he could’ve gotten notices from the Vatican early. We don’t know. when it how many times the Vatican reached out. I think Father would probably know more than we do as he’s probably more familiar with Canon law than we are.
Who changed the words of consecration? I have always heard them exactly the same for over 30 years that I've been Catholic. Same words Jesus used at the Last Supper.
Do you agree with the Pope on the worship service on Pachamama on the grounds of the Vatican? Was that heretic? Those things coupled with many others are what have the faithful watching this papacy with reservation
Try watching videos from Reason and Theology on these questions that are disturbing you. Whatever media you're watching is spreading anit-Catholic, anti-Pope misinformation. Even some "Catholic" media are doing this. Don't rush to judgment based on this click bait. Have confidence in Jesus, who founded His Church and promised that the gates of hell would not prevail. If you trust Jesus, you can trust that He is fully in charge of His Church, the Magisterium, and the Pope. If Jesus allows our Holy Father Pope Francis to be slandered and misunderstood, it is for the purification of His Bride, the Church. Who will trust in Jesus' promises, regardless of what reporters and critics say, and who will rush to judgment, becoming proud and arrogant, thinking they are smarter than Jesus, and walk away from His Church?
They don’t trust that is the problem, you have to trust God, if it be his will that Francis was pope then so be it, when Peter tried to stop Jesus from his death Jesus said “get behind me satan, am I not to drink the cup the father has given me” now okay Jesus loved Peter and Peter was coming from a good place he thought but he was stopping the will of God, Jesus had to die, it was part of his mission, to conquer death and save humanity. So too with the church, he is allowing the church to be attacked, and scorned but he knows that his will, can and works, so no matter if the devil thinks he won, our people think the pope is an antichrist, they are fooled. Now people mention the ape of the church, the ape of the church is NOT the Novus ordo, is the Novus ordo perfect NO, but is it evil NO. How do you expect people to learn their faith if they can’t understand what the priest is saying, common sense, sure if the Eucharistic prayers are in Latin that’s fine, but the word the readings etc need to be able to read in their own language. Saint Therese of liesiux says “Do little with great love” I once met a guy with Down syndrome, happiest guy I ever met in that moment I realised, that losing a few Latin words isn’t important, yeah sure it’s nice but what about other trad rites like Byzantine and Maronite they are valid if not more valid than the Latin rite. The Latin is the vulgate language used in Rome at the time, the reason why Latin hurts the devil so much is because Rome before Christianity and rest of Europe was his territory. The territory of pagan rule, so when Jesus sent Peter to Rome and the people who used to praise the false Gods in Latin then began speaking of the true God in Latin, the devils get so angry at that because it reminds them of the land they lost. Latin is a holy language but it’s not the be all and end all. It’s just a language. So basically the ape of the church will be the total removal of the papacy, pope will not be a fixed term, however the church will survive the pope will go underground. So when the popes in the big house we are safe enough.
SSPX in Schism? Come on Father. I’m not one to attend the NO mass. Tell us why the Vatican wishes to abolish the Latin Mass? Fear? They might be overwhelmed by Christ on the cross? Please comment Father. Latin Mass just ended in my diocese. I’m off to the SSPX ASAP
@@challengable I owe you no explanation. . Why are you deflecting the issue of Vigano? Even the SSPX has rejected him. As far as you going? That’s your decision. You have no need for affirmation from me. And you obviously have issues with the Church. So be it.
@@FrStephenImbarrato thank you Father. I have no issues with the Church. Archbishop Lefebvre was completely correct. Imagine that, one man out of the entire Church got it right. Now that they have banned the Latin Mass in my area as of last Sunday, I have no choice but to follow the way Lefebvre and all Catholics submited to the Holy Mass for 1800 years. The issue I have is with people who refuse the Mass as it was proscribed by Vatican II. I can hardly follow those who refuse the Latin Mass. The fact that you owe me no explanation is erroneous in itself. Don’t you wish to stand for the faith and tradition? You ARE a priest, right?
@@FrStephenImbarrato what a great shepherd you are. "Blindly follow me as I rant on the internet to thousands and refuse to explain my reasoning." I'll stick with people who can articulate their reasoning and back it with hundreds of years of tradition and dogma. People who stay true to the Faith.
@@alexh2262Try this "As we read in another place, the person who abandons the teaching of the Roman pontiff cannot be within the church" -Lateran V "You are not to be looked upon as holding the true Catholic faith if you do not teach that the faith of Rome is to be held" -Satis Cognitum 13 Leo XIII
I love what we are seeing as a defense of Viganó. Father! There is sin everywhere in the Church! Why isn’t Vigano’s sin ok? Answer: now pay close attention everyone…because Martin Luther’s sin wasn’t ok.
Ya know , I thought a priest was ordained to preach the Gospel, live the Gospel and making the Sacraments. As St Mother Teresa use to say. “ you put a very distressing disguise on Christ.”
Can you explain to me the most glaring heresy Taylor Marshall is spreading? I need specifics from you as my soul is at risk. Please help and respond clearly to my question.
@@alexh2262 I don’t think we’re talking about heresy. I don’t think I’ve ever reference Taylor Marshall is being a heretic. But he does great damage to the paper sea and tries to undermine the popes authority. And criticism of the pope. Then his support and propping up a Vegano over his last few years is a serious problem. Possibly made him a materialism Matic. Now he’s backing off all of that. So that is a good thing.but I don’t think he is honest at all. I would be very careful with him.
@@FrStephenImbarratoVigano has spoken up and pointed out many wrongs. To now see him go full blown in disobedience and declaring Pope Francis not Pope when he has no authority to do so is very upsetting and sad to see. Taylor Marshall recognizes that Vigano went too far. There's nothing wrong with having had respect for someone and then distancing yourself once you see them go off the deep end. That's called prudence and that's what Taylor Marshall is doing.
@@FrStephenImbarrato Thank you for your response. So what you're saying is that you don't like that he critiques the Pope publicly or supports anyone who also critiques the Pope publicly. And, you don't like that he is very successful in his works since you state that he is "materialism Matic" which I understand to mean that he is in this for the money that he is making. I'm not an ardent follower of Dr. Marshall, but I have heard his case about the pachamama incident which seems, to me, to be a misguided step of the Pope. I heard his case about the fact that Pope Francis is more concerned with environmental issues than he is about biblical moral teachings. I have seen that the Pope voices his concerns with climate change. Dr. Marshall follows that up with the fact that the Pope authorized blessings of same-sex relationships and that those people are allowed to receive communion without a change in their life or repentance which indicates the previous point is true. Of course, I have listened to the rebuttal about the verbiage of the statement and that blessing people in any state they are in life is good, but that does not require any official statement from the Vatican to bless people who feel they need God in their lives. This led to photo shoots of priests blessing people in same-sex relationships. I, therefore, must conclude that this is another misguided step of the Pope. Then, you have to consider the Pope's comment on homosexuality ("who am I to judge") rather than telling people the truth about living in sin which is what the highest authority of the Church should do. So, you say 1. Dr. Marshall is not spreading heresy. 2. You are upset that he is criticizing the Pope and that criticism causes the laity and religious to view the Papacy in a negative light which causes schism within the Church. 3. You are upset that Dr. Marshall is benefitting materialistically for the work that he is doing. I am not convinced that Pope Francis is not the one causing the schism within the Church with the facts I laid out above. Everyone must understand that we are all subject to tests by God with temptations, and the Pope is not immune to that. Pope Francis' commitment to outlaw the Traditional Mass is not winning me over either. I made a massive conversion back to the Church after attending a Latin Mass. I felt the presence of God during that service which I never had at the Novis Ordo service. I think the Novis Ordo Mass is irreverent and undisciplined. I certainly have much to learn, but even Saint Thomas Aquinas said “I can write no more. I have seen things that make my writings like straw" a few months before he died. We are all on this journey together, and I pray God gives us all the graces to see, and to hear, and to do His will. God Bless.
@@TS17007 after much damage had been done and he was basically boxed into a corner. Almost everything I know about Vigano (and it is a lot), I got from TM and I grew incredulous at how he was finding no issues with him while I was becoming more and more alarmed. He propped Vigano up quite a bit. He only recently addressed the reconsecration and he fluffed it off. I was calling it a schismatic act 6 months ago along with many other acts reported by TM without criticism…the seminary, the ordaining of priests.
@alexh2262 I think Father Stephen mistyped when he wrote "materialism matic". I think he meant to type, materlist schismatic, which I think is a reference to a type of heresy and has nothing to do with monetization. There are two types. Material Heresey and formal Heresy. Material Heresy means someone who's opinions are heretical, but they don't realize it as being so. Formal Heresy is when someone knows something is heretical and pursues it anyways. I don't agree with all of Father's opinions of people, but I did want to clarify his position on what I think he was trying to say, which is also what I tried to do about Taylor Marshall.
The Church is both humand AND divine. Jesus never said the Church was never to be without any challenges. The Pope was given full authority - Keys Mt. 16:16 to bind and lose (Mt. 18:18) When you reject the Church through the Pope you reject Jesus. Jesus told Faustina #1218 that schisimatics tore his body and heart which is his Church.
Dear Fernandez family, You said exactly the right words: "We try to be faithful Catholics." Don't worry about the insanity around you. In every century the Church has been attacked by the devil, who wants to destroy the Church. But remember that Jesus guaranteed the Church He founded. He said, the gates of hell will not prevail against My Church. Jesus gave Peter the Keys to the Kingdom of heaven. Our current Pope, Pope Francis, is the successor of Peter. You can trust that the Magisterium and the Pope are God's Will for the Church in this time in history. I am a Jewish convert to the Catholic Faith. I was converted by a dream. I had an experience like St. Paul. I love Jesus with all my heart and soul, and trust Him absolutely. I believe He is able to protect His Church as He promised. Don't let confused people disturb you, or distract you from being faithful to Jesus in His Church and in His Sacraments. Have confidence in God's power and love. Please keep going to Mass, pray the rosary, and pay no attention to the storm raging around you. Our house, the one holy Catholic and Apostolic Church, is built on Rock, not on sand. I'm doing exactly what I'm recommending to you: Daily Mass, regular Confession, daily rosary, Chaplet of Divine Mercy, Holy Hours, and many other prayers. Jesus is alive, and He has all the power. I will pray for you, God's beloved Fernandez family. "Jesus, I trust in You."
Judas Iscariot was one of Jesus’ disciples too but the other disciples were faithful. If you keep focusing on Judas, you’ll never love Jesus like the other disciples do.
So you’ve never sinned? Don’t be a devil’s agent because devil always tries to remind people of their sins to cause despair. But God forgives after when you repent.
Vigano is courageous in defending the faith. This is why so many remain silent because they see how defending the truth will result in what has happened to Pavone Strickland and now Vigano. The powerful laugh at being able to silence those who dare to criticize them. These are sad days for Catholics. To me, the Pope is causing much harm to Catholics, the faith and the Catholic Church.
@@deborah5763 you are then in the same Church as Vigano and it isn’t the Catholic Church founded by Christ. You can’t even distinguish between the cases you mention. You honor abject disobedience. Your ignorance may save you though. A bit ironic.
@@redsunset7856 I am warning the Catholics who follow me. I am sure you have let the Vigano people know that they are causing division in the Church of which I am warning.
TM works from within the Church to inflict damage. It seems self-evident that TM wishes to remain in the Church to continue his rantings and ravings as is the case with other influencers like him …
Did he go through the entire RCIA program to convert or was he shooed in by a friendly priest? Sorry to ask this, but I'm becoming a bit too skeptic lately about people who say they're Catholic but say/do things that aren't.
@@lucillejerome5511 I agree with you … do not recall how TM was able to wiggle his way into the Church. I think there is a utube on his conversion somewhere. I am not able to locate it at the moment.
Can you explain to me the most glaring heresy Taylor Marshall is spreading? I need specifics from you as my soul is at risk. Please help and respond clearly to my question.
@@alexh2262 TM is not in communion with Pope Francis … never has been actually. Second, TM has provided support for former Archbishop Vigano and continues to do so. Third, TM is highly manipulative and just full of mischief against the Church. While I am not really a big fan of Michael Lofton, I note that he has been keeping tabs on reactions concerning Vigano’s excommunication and here is TM’s. ua-cam.com/video/f83rx2sM2ig/v-deo.htmlsi=0KLcEeJHCtrSmk79 I hope you find this helpful.
Paul corrected Peter for being a hypocrite, not for false teaching. Vigano and gang accuse Pope Francis of teaching heresy and deny he is the Pope. They are not the same.
@@Fiddleslip They actually are the same. Peter was doing something wrong and was corrected. Keep it simple. They are not the exact same sins, so you can feel correct in what you are saying. However both situations involve correction, so I am still correct in what I said.
@@Fiddleslip And it is false teaching to present a Pachamama in front of the flock. It is false teaching to bless gays... God is not a God of confusion, so tell me why that particular document keeps needing to be rewritten. It's because it is a document that is teaching falsely. It's just like Vatican II which states that Mooslims believe in the same God we do. That is full on incorrect. And you can call me what you want to for pointing out facts, but it is what it is. Now, someone can try to explain those statements away as well, but the fact of the matter is the wording will not change and wording like that is blatantly false.
@@Fiddleslip Directly from usccb website: “But the plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator, in the first place among whom are the Muslims: these profess to hold the faith of Abraham, and together with us they adore the one, merciful God, mankind’s judge on the last day.” Anyone who knows anything about Islam knows that this statement is blatantly false.
@@DUB-Track if you think correcting a Pope for his personal conduct and correcting his authoritative teachings are the same, then I can only echo Fr. Imbarrato's sentiment about the poorly catechized. As for that snippet from USCCB about muslims: Muslims DO profess to hold the faith of abraham, and they DO adore the one, merciful God, etc, etc. Ask any muslim, and they will affirm this. Now, both their understanding of that God and their knowledge about the faith of Abraham are rudimentary and fraught with error and heresy, as one would expect from what is essentially a christian heresy, as St. John Damascene believed. On this point, they are not unlike the Jews who deny the trinity and deny Jesus was the Son of God. Read Lumen Gentium section 14 to 16 to get a better undestanding of what the quote actually means. tl:dr, Lumen Gentium lists groups of people by proximity to the church. First is Catholics who reside within the church. Next are non-catholic christians who, although are outside the church, are linked to it by baptism, though they lack communion with the Successor of Peter and may not profess the fullness of the faith. After that are the Jews, who are more closely related to the church than any other non-christian religion, as they were chosen by God and were the first to receive his revelations. Muslims, besides polytheists and atheists, are furthest from the church In the case of Islam, they believe in the virgin birth, in Jesus as the Messiah, in Jesus coming in judgment during the last days, but reject Jesus as the Son of God, reject God as a trinity, and have various other errors in their knowledge of God. What Lumen Gentium, V2, that quote from the catechism, etc., is NOT saying, is that these religions are alternate paths to salvation. That is firmly repudiated. In fact, the section that comes after the one containing the quote you mentioned is titled, "Outside the Church there is no Salvation"
Matthew 23:9 And do not call anyone on earth your father; for only One is your father, He who is in heaven. John 14:6 Jesus sai to him, " I am the way, and the truth, and the life, no one comes to the Father except through me. Mary can not do anything for you, nor the Pope for that matter.
So he gets reconsecrated by someone who defies manmade laws in dozens of countries for people who reject Jesus Christ for more than teo thousand years? Why are you suddenly making arguments FOR Vigano, Father?
Sorry but no. Sadly, and I do mean sorrowfully Catholicism ( the church of Jesus Christ, and His Apostle’s) would always echo the words of the first Pope. I am certain that all would agree with the words of St. Peter, and require zero influence of interpretation. The second epistle of St.Peter chapter 2 reads, and I quote” But there were also false prophets among the people, even as there shall be among you lying teachers, who shall bring in sects of perdition, and deny the Lord who bought them: bringing upon themselves swift destruction. 2. And many shall follow their riotousnesses, through whom the way of truth shall be evil spoken of. 3. And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you. Whose judgment now of a long time lingereth not, and their perdition slumbereth not. 4. For God spared not the angels that sinned, but delivered them, drawn down by infernal ropes to the lower hell, unto torments, to be reserved unto judgment.” Have any of you watched the videos on you tube, part 1-3 entitled Our Lady Of Good Success?
@@michellestansberry9101 are you saying you researched this and could not find anything about it? Or you want someone else to do your research! Almost everything I know about Vigsno I have gotten from Vigano or one of his proppers like TM or JHW
Former Archbishop Vigano was excommunicated because he denied Pope Francis,and not because he do some comment about the holo... You set bacwards on your horse😄 Don't take the way some other direction. It's so pathetic ....
This priest seems humble. He seems obedient to the Catholic Church, this is how all Priests, bishops and Cardinals should be.
You know what's heartbreaking? Some of these people were responsible for my reversion to the church. Now they are leading people to hell. How very sad.
I'm so glad I found you Father.
Vigano will be a saint, that’s for sure.
Can you explain to me the most glaring heresy "these people" are spreading? I need specifics from you as my soul is at risk. Please help and respond clearly to my question.
What is interesting to me is that for 60 years I WAS NOT CATECHISED. I would have bought into the Viganos and the Marshells but I dove into the Catechism and the true teachings. We are subjetcts in the "Kingdom" that Jesus established on earth until we go home to him.
Sorry but no. Sadly, and I do mean sorrowfully Catholicism ( the church of Jesus Christ, and His Apostle’s) would always echo the words of the first Pope. I am certain that all would agree with the words of St. Peter, and require zero influence of interpretation. The second epistle of St.Peter chapter 2 reads, and I quote” But there were also false prophets among the people, even as there shall be among you lying teachers, who shall bring in sects of perdition, and deny the Lord who bought them: bringing upon themselves swift destruction. 2. And many shall follow their riotousnesses, through whom the way of truth shall be evil spoken of. 3. And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you. Whose judgment now of a long time lingereth not, and their perdition slumbereth not. 4. For God spared not the angels that sinned, but delivered them, drawn down by infernal ropes to the lower hell, unto torments, to be reserved unto judgment.” Have any of you watched the videos on you tube, part 1-3 entitled Our Lady Of Good Success?
Father, you are a great priest! Keep up the good work, and thank you for answering the call!
Brilliant Father Love Our One HOLY Catholic and Apostolic Church Obedience always 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
All of these politics are way above my pay grade. So I’m just going to dive into my Bible and Catechism and leave all this up to people much smarter than me.
Long live our beautiful Catholic and Apostolic Church. I bid you all peace.
All I hear from these dissenters is self-righteousness & arrogance, all from pride. I don’t listen to them at all now. I don’t want to give them the clicks, not even to correct error.
I really appreciate your podcast. I love that you stay focused on what’s important, love of God & others, pro-life, obedience to the Magisterium, etc. Thank you.🙏❤️
Can you explain to me the most glaring heresy traditionalists are spreading? I need specifics from you as my soul is at risk. Please help and respond clearly to my question.
@@alexh2262 To put it simply, they don’t accept the authority of the Magisterium in one degree or another. Listening to them will eventually lead to sedevacanists, believing there is no Pope, to leaving the Church all together as Vigano has done.
@@TrixRNanybody that takes the sedevacantist position does not understand. It is an untenable position. It is our duty to question positions that are against the faith. Read Bellarmine
@@bobtosi9346
We absolutely should.
The entire deposit of faith should be re-examined in light of the fact that some Catholics are saying that error has been taught since 2013, or 1962, or 1958. Because it is unlikely that the smoke of satan has only entered the Church in 20th/21st Centuries.
All doctrines and practices of the Church should be tested against the purity and truth of the Gospels.
Those that fail the test shpuld be ditched as garbage, however dear they may be to us.
Ave Maria.
Thank you for the prayers Father.
Thanks, Father!
All Vigano has done is call out the Harlot Church. Time to wake up or face divine wrath .😢
Taylor Marshall is probably already automatically excommunicated by saying that V2 taught heresy.
He also said that vigano may not be validly excommunicated despite the ruling of the magisterium.
I don't think Protestantism truly left Taylor Marshall.
Unfortunately he’s helping Satan snatch souls from the Catholic Church. The weak in the faith falls easily to Taylor’s deception
Taylor is the infiltrator. Unfortunately we now know
@@CatholicSaintsAndAngels Can you explain to me the most glaring heresy Taylor Marshall is spreading? I need specifics from you as my soul is at risk. Please help and respond clearly to my question.
@alexh2262 They're wrong. Taylor Marshall is not spreading heresy. He has stated multiple times that he believes Pope Francis is the pope. None of us, including Vigano can declare the pope as not being the pope. The only one who can declare that is a future pope, which Taylor Marshall has said many times. And being critical of Pope Francis doesn't mean you don't believe he's pope. Pope Francis is currently, in my opinion, not a good pope and causing mass confusion in the church. But despite that, I believe he is the Pope, and so we must pray.
Im sorry, Father. For they do not know what they're doing. 😥
a study from italy shows peoples life expentancy is down 37%, and the pope advised people to do that thing and the vatican made a commenorative coin to celebrate it
and Vigano said not to get it.
hmmm...
Seen the-
It's Okay
-video yet? Why does the CC tolerate the fact that these evils contributed to the research and development of all immortal cell lines and encompasses tests from them that generated the last experimental inoculation?
"I'm not rejecting the authority of the Pope there are some people and you're going to see it who because they disagree with the Pope on a particular instance they consider the pope a heretic they consider the pope illegitimate or because they they feel that the pope has has taught some some error in one area that they can reject everything that he says and does now."
Actually Pope Paul IV establishes that in Cum Ex Apostolatus Officio, so on what authority you ask, the same authority you claim Francis to have. Pius X officially introduced papal infallibility just over a century ago and it never allowed sin or heresy. Francis is well outside of his authority.
"The question becomes who are you to say the pope is wrong in this area or this area or this area who are you so that's just a question unto itself."
Just a sinful Catholic that can read.
"Is the pope suppressing the Latin Mass immoral? Is it immoral, I dare say you can't make that case that it's immoral do I believe it's it's wrong yes."
What is the difference between wrong and immoral?
"I believe that we should have more masses not fewer masses I believe that the Latin Mass should be available for those people who want to indulge themselves in that mass as they would any other right it could be a particular right of the church as the Byzantine malachite right right different rights in the church so I disagree with the Pope on him suppressing that..."
If that were the case you would make an official complaint, words of sympathy here are mere placeholders for inaction, staked further into the heart of the issue in the next few sentences.
"But is it immoral for him to suppress it, what about the binding and loosing power of
the church? I this is one thing we never hear about from Taylor Marshall and John Henry Weston and Stein and Matt."
Regardless of morals he can not do it. Stay on topic, not only did you not need to direct your weapon towards your own teammates, you certainly didn't need to fire that many times, but you did. I pray for all of our sakes that most of the clergy is nowhere near this petty.
"The Binding loosing power of the church you're telling me that the church the Pope the papacy does not have the power to change the Liturgy."
Yes, full stop, I am telling you the pope has no authority to change the Latin rite, pope Pius V in Quo Primum explicitly stated that.
"as long the words of consecration are not changed, and even then even then if they say these are the sacred words of Consecration and that you are to do these couple of things say these words and perform these acts at the Consecration and then indeed The Bread and Wine will become the body and blood of Christ if the church deemed that and you disagreed with it for whatever reason, who are you to disagree with the binding and losing power of the church?"
I had to go to the transcript and make sure you said what I thought you said, that was nonsense. Let me counter with a very simple question to test your logic. If the church deemed that sin was allowed, including murder, and you disagree with it for whatever reason, who are you to disagree with the binding and loosing power of the church?
"I I I don't understand this!"
I could tell. Either Paul IV, and Pius V combined have less authority than Francis in your mind? Or does the Holy spirit just get bored and change it's mind after a while? Genuinely curious.
Either way, yes heresy is possible from the pope. Clearly catechesis is a big problem, and I sincerely thank everyone you disparaged in this video for defending the Catholic faith. I pray that more people learn and defend the faith well, and that the next pontiff repairs the rifts in the Church that Francis and his ilk created. I may not agree 100% with Vigano, but he is far from the one who has to humble himself and swallow his pride.
Traditionalism is protestantism - both are heresies.
I don't understand what you mean by Traditionalism is Protestantism.
'The Deposit of Faith and the Tradition' is that which the Pope and the Magisterium must defend.
.
@@aseeker2109 No to the Mass, no to the Liturgy. no to the Second Vatican Council, no to the Magisterium, no to the Pope(s), no to the Church.
@@a.t.c.3862a statement like this clearly shows you have no clue what the true faith is about.
@bobtosi9346 Your lack of knowledge absolves you from some responsibility - but not all.
traditionalism is a new head which has emerged from the neck of the beast. It is protestantism under a new guise.
The battle in Heaven, Lucifer's rebellion against God is about disobedience and pride. The coming of our Lord is to restore obedience and humility. Vigano demonstrates he openly embraces pride and disobedience. Who you gas chosen to be a guide of your faith? Listen to this good priest talking.
The enemies of the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church used Obedience as a reason to persecute those faithful shepherds who courageously speaks the Truth, and charge them of disobedience, and schisms. "Blind guide who guides the blind will both fall into the ditch." Many Cardinals and Bishops who are spiritually asleep and spiritually blind are indifferent and coward, just keep silent in all the errors, heresies, and lies are guilty of the "Sin of Ommission." They blindly obey and blindly follow those apostates that dictates them who occupied in Vatican without thinking what is right and what is wrong. Wake-up! They are like Pontius Pilate who is indifferent and coward, who washed his hands and handed Jesus Christ to the people to be crucified on the Cross. These modern pharisees in Vatican are deceiving many people of their hypocrisy. Faithful Bishop Vigano who courageously speaks the Truth is a victim of injustice and persecution from within. They allowed the Pride blasphemous satanic mass of the LGBTQ, but restricted the Traditional Latin Holy Mass. You call evil to the righteous, but call good to evil men?
@@MaryBelleDasas-gp9tj those who have ears ought to hear
@@FrStephenImbarratowhere is my comment?
Arrogance,and pride also evil
@@ohmycar4987 not sure. I haven’t deleted any
@@FrStephenImbarrato the admins are working
Vigano, the faithful bishop who, as Papal Nuncio to the US, refused to investigate the accusations against McCarrick, when he was instructed to do so by Cardinal Ouellet, Prefect of the Congregation for Bishops.
Comes down to Trusting Our Lord Jesus Christ fully (or not fully trusting in many cases) and it's where we're at....Wheat and Tares....oldest story in humanity, the desire to become our own gods and making idols of others....and decide on our Truths etc....as Christ told us...Do not be anxious about your life....
i stand with Vigano
Follow vigano we do not need you in the church 😂😂😂
I can't listen to this "priest" who thinks the pope is Christ - the pope in NOT Christ, in fact the current pope renounces the title "Vicar of Christ". The current pope has no authority if he doesn't consider himself the Vicar of Christ.
@@dominiquedominique8395 well 1/st of all I never said he was Christ. 2nd he did not reject the title Vicar of Christ. Obviously you have a problem processing info or with the truth. It is fine if you can’t listen to me. They could listen to my namesake either.
Fr- with all do respect, Pope Francis did indeed reject the title, “Vicar of Christ”, relegating it officially to a “historical title” as listed in the Pontifical Yearbook 2020, published on March 25 that year.
Look it up, it’s prominently found with a simple Google search.
@@dominiquedominique8395
And you are the Vicaress of Christ? Nique, nique 🎸
@@a.t.c.3862 both yourself and Fr. misunderstood my comment - my point was that we must obey Christ, not the pope when he is preaching false gospels - we will know them by their fruits and the current pope is producing nothing but LGBT and global vaccines.
Vigano should swallow his pride and admit he’s wrong. You’re so right that we don’t know the whole story . My guess is he’s been counseled a few times and maybe in his stubbornness doesn’t want to obey. I am a product of Catholic schooling in the fifties and we learned that the only time the Pope was infallible was when he spoke ex cathedra. Whether we like him or not is immaterial as he’s head of the Church here on earth. I’m pretty sure too as you once said that we won’t be asked at our judgment what we thought of the Pope. I also wonder if Vigano remembers good priests were sometimes silenced by the Pope but they were obedient and didn’t infer that perhaps they weren’t validly elected.
Your first sentence states that Vigano should admit that he's wrong. Your second sentence is that we don't know the whole story. Kind of a contradiction to your point, isn't it?
@@alexh2262 Not really. As Father stated, he could’ve gotten notices from the Vatican early. We don’t know. when it how many times the Vatican reached out. I think Father would probably know more than we do as he’s probably more familiar with Canon law than we are.
@@rosemariekury9186 So why are you commenting on something you don't know about?
Should Vigano kiss the hammer and sickle mockery that Bergolio was gifted?
Staying is quiet is why groomers were given a pass for centuries.
Father, no need to argue with people who have chosen Lucifer's path. Lucifer has given them a sharp tongue of pride. They will never to you.
Self-righteousness, arrogance is coming also from the evil
So much for the unchanged unchangeable if the words of consecration are changed.
Who changed the words of consecration? I have always heard them exactly the same for over 30 years that I've been Catholic. Same words Jesus used at the Last Supper.
Do you agree with the Pope on the worship service on Pachamama on the grounds of the Vatican? Was that heretic? Those things coupled with many others are what have the faithful watching this papacy with reservation
Try watching videos from Reason and Theology on these questions that are disturbing you. Whatever media you're watching is spreading anit-Catholic, anti-Pope misinformation. Even some "Catholic" media are doing this. Don't rush to judgment based on this click bait. Have confidence in Jesus, who founded His Church and promised that the gates of hell would not prevail. If you trust Jesus, you can trust that He is fully in charge of His Church, the Magisterium, and the Pope. If Jesus allows our Holy Father Pope Francis to be slandered and misunderstood, it is for the purification of His Bride, the Church. Who will trust in Jesus' promises, regardless of what reporters and critics say, and who will rush to judgment, becoming proud and arrogant, thinking they are smarter than Jesus, and walk away from His Church?
i only affirm francis as the pope because of bare minimum, not because I am a fan of francis but because sedevacantism is a dead end.
False Obedience is real thing.
God Bless Vigano! What a grace for our times, ABP Lefebvre of our era!
Luther, the Protestant is praised by your manifest h Pope..
Imagine taking sides with Luther!!!!? Bregolio himself not only sides with Luther he has a statue of Luther in the Vatican!
They don’t trust that is the problem, you have to trust God, if it be his will that Francis was pope then so be it, when Peter tried to stop Jesus from his death Jesus said “get behind me satan, am I not to drink the cup the father has given me” now okay Jesus loved Peter and Peter was coming from a good place he thought but he was stopping the will of God, Jesus had to die, it was part of his mission, to conquer death and save humanity. So too with the church, he is allowing the church to be attacked, and scorned but he knows that his will, can and works, so no matter if the devil thinks he won, our people think the pope is an antichrist, they are fooled. Now people mention the ape of the church, the ape of the church is NOT the Novus ordo, is the Novus ordo perfect NO, but is it evil NO. How do you expect people to learn their faith if they can’t understand what the priest is saying, common sense, sure if the Eucharistic prayers are in Latin that’s fine, but the word the readings etc need to be able to read in their own language. Saint Therese of liesiux says “Do little with great love” I once met a guy with Down syndrome, happiest guy I ever met in that moment I realised, that losing a few Latin words isn’t important, yeah sure it’s nice but what about other trad rites like Byzantine and Maronite they are valid if not more valid than the Latin rite. The Latin is the vulgate language used in Rome at the time, the reason why Latin hurts the devil so much is because Rome before Christianity and rest of Europe was his territory. The territory of pagan rule, so when Jesus sent Peter to Rome and the people who used to praise the false Gods in Latin then began speaking of the true God in Latin, the devils get so angry at that because it reminds them of the land they lost. Latin is a holy language but it’s not the be all and end all. It’s just a language. So basically the ape of the church will be the total removal of the papacy, pope will not be a fixed term, however the church will survive the pope will go underground. So when the popes in the big house we are safe enough.
SSPX in Schism? Come on Father. I’m not one to attend the NO mass. Tell us why the Vatican wishes to abolish the Latin Mass? Fear? They might be overwhelmed by Christ on the cross? Please comment Father. Latin Mass just ended in my diocese. I’m off to the SSPX ASAP
@@challengable I owe you no explanation. . Why are you deflecting the issue of Vigano? Even the SSPX has rejected him. As far as you going? That’s your decision. You have no need for affirmation from me. And you obviously have issues with the Church. So be it.
@@FrStephenImbarrato thank you Father. I have no issues with the Church. Archbishop Lefebvre was completely correct. Imagine that, one man out of the entire Church got it right. Now that they have banned the Latin Mass in my area as of last Sunday, I have no choice but to follow the way Lefebvre and all Catholics submited to the Holy Mass for 1800 years. The issue I have is with people who refuse the Mass as it was proscribed by Vatican II. I can hardly follow those who refuse the Latin Mass.
The fact that you owe me no explanation is erroneous in itself. Don’t you wish to stand for the faith and tradition? You ARE a priest, right?
@@FrStephenImbarrato what a great shepherd you are. "Blindly follow me as I rant on the internet to thousands and refuse to explain my reasoning." I'll stick with people who can articulate their reasoning and back it with hundreds of years of tradition and dogma. People who stay true to the Faith.
@@alexh2262Try this
"As we read in another place, the person who abandons the teaching of the Roman pontiff cannot be within the church" -Lateran V
"You are not to be looked upon as holding the true Catholic faith if you do not teach that the faith of Rome is to be held" -Satis Cognitum 13 Leo XIII
@FrStephenImbarrato Great comment, Father!
Here is another conundrum... 1Cor 7:14. I am the victim of annullments. Do you see what that says about me? I will never agree with annullments!
I love what we are seeing as a defense of Viganó. Father! There is sin everywhere in the Church! Why isn’t Vigano’s sin ok? Answer: now pay close attention everyone…because Martin Luther’s sin wasn’t ok.
no one should leave the church ever, but work together
@@FrStephenImbarrato that big meeting the pope had last fall,,all my local reps were praising the rainbow poeple, hpw sad
How do you know Luther isn't the Pope?
Bergolio loved Luther enough to host a statue of him and commission an official Vatican stamp.
@@Willis_S so sad
Ya know , I thought a priest was ordained to preach the Gospel, live the Gospel and making the Sacraments. As St Mother Teresa use to say. “ you put a very distressing disguise on Christ.”
@@user-zx6oj7uz8w I live stream mass daily with adoration most days w a homily.
Can you explain to me the most glaring heresy Taylor Marshall is spreading? I need specifics from you as my soul is at risk. Please help and respond clearly to my question.
@@alexh2262 I don’t think we’re talking about heresy. I don’t think I’ve ever reference Taylor Marshall is being a heretic. But he does great damage to the paper sea and tries to undermine the popes authority. And criticism of the pope. Then his support and propping up a Vegano over his last few years is a serious problem. Possibly made him a materialism Matic. Now he’s backing off all of that. So that is a good thing.but I don’t think he is honest at all. I would be very careful with him.
@@FrStephenImbarratoVigano has spoken up and pointed out many wrongs. To now see him go full blown in disobedience and declaring Pope Francis not Pope when he has no authority to do so is very upsetting and sad to see. Taylor Marshall recognizes that Vigano went too far. There's nothing wrong with having had respect for someone and then distancing yourself once you see them go off the deep end. That's called prudence and that's what Taylor Marshall is doing.
@@FrStephenImbarrato Thank you for your response.
So what you're saying is that you don't like that he critiques the Pope publicly or supports anyone who also critiques the Pope publicly. And, you don't like that he is very successful in his works since you state that he is "materialism Matic" which I understand to mean that he is in this for the money that he is making.
I'm not an ardent follower of Dr. Marshall, but I have heard his case about the pachamama incident which seems, to me, to be a misguided step of the Pope.
I heard his case about the fact that Pope Francis is more concerned with environmental issues than he is about biblical moral teachings. I have seen that the Pope voices his concerns with climate change. Dr. Marshall follows that up with the fact that the Pope authorized blessings of same-sex relationships and that those people are allowed to receive communion without a change in their life or repentance which indicates the previous point is true. Of course, I have listened to the rebuttal about the verbiage of the statement and that blessing people in any state they are in life is good, but that does not require any official statement from the Vatican to bless people who feel they need God in their lives. This led to photo shoots of priests blessing people in same-sex relationships. I, therefore, must conclude that this is another misguided step of the Pope.
Then, you have to consider the Pope's comment on homosexuality ("who am I to judge") rather than telling people the truth about living in sin which is what the highest authority of the Church should do.
So, you say
1. Dr. Marshall is not spreading heresy.
2. You are upset that he is criticizing the Pope and that criticism causes the laity and religious to view the Papacy in a negative light which causes schism within the Church.
3. You are upset that Dr. Marshall is benefitting materialistically for the work that he is doing.
I am not convinced that Pope Francis is not the one causing the schism within the Church with the facts I laid out above. Everyone must understand that we are all subject to tests by God with temptations, and the Pope is not immune to that.
Pope Francis' commitment to outlaw the Traditional Mass is not winning me over either. I made a massive conversion back to the Church after attending a Latin Mass. I felt the presence of God during that service which I never had at the Novis Ordo service. I think the Novis Ordo Mass is irreverent and undisciplined.
I certainly have much to learn, but even Saint Thomas Aquinas said “I can write no more. I have seen things that make my writings like straw" a few months before he died. We are all on this journey together, and I pray God gives us all the graces to see, and to hear, and to do His will.
God Bless.
@@TS17007 after much damage had been done and he was basically boxed into a corner. Almost everything I know about Vigano (and it is a lot), I got from TM and I grew incredulous at how he was finding no issues with him while I was becoming more and more alarmed. He propped Vigano up quite a bit. He only recently addressed the reconsecration and he fluffed it off. I was calling it a schismatic act 6 months ago along with many other acts reported by TM without criticism…the seminary, the ordaining of priests.
@alexh2262 I think Father Stephen mistyped when he wrote "materialism matic". I think he meant to type, materlist schismatic, which I think is a reference to a type of heresy and has nothing to do with monetization. There are two types. Material Heresey and formal Heresy. Material Heresy means someone who's opinions are heretical, but they don't realize it as being so. Formal Heresy is when someone knows something is heretical and pursues it anyways. I don't agree with all of Father's opinions of people, but I did want to clarify his position on what I think he was trying to say, which is also what I tried to do about Taylor Marshall.
The Church is both humand AND divine. Jesus never said the Church was never to be without any challenges. The Pope was given full authority - Keys Mt. 16:16 to bind and lose (Mt. 18:18)
When you reject the Church through the Pope you reject Jesus. Jesus told Faustina #1218 that schisimatics tore his body and heart which is his Church.
I'm with Vigano. Bergoglio is playing his part just like Judas.
You are spot on❤
My family and I are super confused. We try to be faithful Catholics, but we just see complete insanity in the Church
@@fernandez3841 I did too until I realized where it was really coming from.
Dear Fernandez family,
You said exactly the right words: "We try to be faithful Catholics." Don't worry about the insanity around you. In every century the Church has been attacked by the devil, who wants to destroy the Church. But remember that Jesus guaranteed the Church He founded. He said, the gates of hell will not prevail against My Church. Jesus gave Peter the Keys to the Kingdom of heaven. Our current Pope, Pope Francis, is the successor of Peter. You can trust that the Magisterium and the Pope are God's Will for the Church in this time in history.
I am a Jewish convert to the Catholic Faith. I was converted by a dream. I had an experience like St. Paul. I love Jesus with all my heart and soul, and trust Him absolutely. I believe He is able to protect His Church as He promised. Don't let confused people disturb you, or distract you from being faithful to Jesus in His Church and in His Sacraments. Have confidence in God's power and love. Please keep going to Mass, pray the rosary, and pay no attention to the storm raging around you. Our house, the one holy Catholic and Apostolic Church, is built on Rock, not on sand. I'm doing exactly what I'm recommending to you: Daily Mass, regular Confession, daily rosary, Chaplet of Divine Mercy, Holy Hours, and many other prayers. Jesus is alive, and He has all the power. I will pray for you, God's beloved Fernandez family.
"Jesus, I trust in You."
how are some priest wearing rainbow colors is that ok,,,,,,,, thats nuts
Judas Iscariot was one of Jesus’ disciples too but the other disciples were faithful. If you keep focusing on Judas, you’ll never love Jesus like the other disciples do.
Never saw that; has no bearing on this topic anyway.
@@lucillejerome5511 but the pope allowes it
@@jonmernick780 Don't think so; but has not bearing anyway on this topic. Try to learn to stay focused!
@@lucillejerome5511 Is the conversation not about Vigano and how he came to his conclusions about the Pope?
the popes advisor wrote a book on kisses, thats ok
So you’ve never sinned? Don’t be a devil’s agent because devil always tries to remind people of their sins to cause despair. But God forgives after when you repent.
@@CatholicSaintsAndAngels to write a whole damn book on art of erotic kissing all i can say is Hi Bael
@@CatholicSaintsAndAngels and after he get his jollies from writing said book, he tries to hide it
Vigano is courageous in defending the faith. This is why so many remain silent because they see how defending the truth will result in what has happened to Pavone Strickland and now Vigano. The powerful laugh at being able to silence those who dare to criticize them. These are sad days for Catholics. To me, the Pope is causing much harm
to Catholics, the faith and the Catholic Church.
@@deborah5763 you are then in the same Church as Vigano and it isn’t the Catholic Church founded by Christ. You can’t even distinguish between the cases you mention. You honor abject disobedience. Your ignorance may save you though. A bit ironic.
@@FrStephenImbarrato this is why there was a thing called the protestant reformation.
Exactly, Vigano is doing just like Luther.
If Vigano does not believe Vatican 2, then why he became a priest under vatican 2? What a liar! He should be ordained under opportunist 2.
Father,
Would you deny Holy Communion to Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi?
Does the devil love when you broadcast division among faithful catholics?
@@redsunset7856 I am warning the Catholics who follow me. I am sure you have let the Vigano people know that they are causing division in the Church of which I am warning.
Yes, he does…I’m with Vigano
Father…….obedience is not equal to stupidity
TM works from within the Church to inflict damage. It seems self-evident that TM wishes to remain in the Church to continue his rantings and ravings as is the case with other influencers like him …
Did he go through the entire RCIA program to convert or was he shooed in by a friendly priest? Sorry to ask this, but I'm becoming a bit too skeptic lately about people who say they're Catholic but say/do things that aren't.
@@lucillejerome5511 I agree with you … do not recall how TM was able to wiggle his way into the Church. I think there is a utube on his conversion somewhere. I am not able to locate it at the moment.
Can you explain to me the most glaring heresy Taylor Marshall is spreading? I need specifics from you as my soul is at risk. Please help and respond clearly to my question.
@@alexh2262 TM is not in communion with Pope Francis … never has been actually. Second, TM has provided support for former Archbishop Vigano and continues to do so. Third, TM is highly manipulative and just full of mischief against the Church. While I am not really a big fan of Michael Lofton, I note that he has been keeping tabs on reactions concerning Vigano’s excommunication and here is TM’s. ua-cam.com/video/f83rx2sM2ig/v-deo.htmlsi=0KLcEeJHCtrSmk79
I hope you find this helpful.
Is he wearing a hoodie
@@saladfingers. yes. My AC is very good…and I am bald
You say, who are you to question the pope? Uhh what you are failing to recognize is that Paul corrected Peter... Think about it.
Paul corrected Peter for being a hypocrite, not for false teaching. Vigano and gang accuse Pope Francis of teaching heresy and deny he is the Pope. They are not the same.
@@Fiddleslip They actually are the same. Peter was doing something wrong and was corrected. Keep it simple. They are not the exact same sins, so you can feel correct in what you are saying. However both situations involve correction, so I am still correct in what I said.
@@Fiddleslip And it is false teaching to present a Pachamama in front of the flock. It is false teaching to bless gays... God is not a God of confusion, so tell me why that particular document keeps needing to be rewritten. It's because it is a document that is teaching falsely.
It's just like Vatican II which states that Mooslims believe in the same God we do. That is full on incorrect. And you can call me what you want to for pointing out facts, but it is what it is. Now, someone can try to explain those statements away as well, but the fact of the matter is the wording will not change and wording like that is blatantly false.
@@Fiddleslip Directly from usccb website:
“But the plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator, in the first place among whom are the Muslims: these profess to hold the faith of Abraham, and together with us they adore the one, merciful God, mankind’s judge on the last day.”
Anyone who knows anything about Islam knows that this statement is blatantly false.
@@DUB-Track if you think correcting a Pope for his personal conduct and correcting his authoritative teachings are the same, then I can only echo Fr. Imbarrato's sentiment about the poorly catechized.
As for that snippet from USCCB about muslims:
Muslims DO profess to hold the faith of abraham, and they DO adore the one, merciful God, etc, etc. Ask any muslim, and they will affirm this. Now, both their understanding of that God and their knowledge about the faith of Abraham are rudimentary and fraught with error and heresy, as one would expect from what is essentially a christian heresy, as St. John Damascene believed. On this point, they are not unlike the Jews who deny the trinity and deny Jesus was the Son of God.
Read Lumen Gentium section 14 to 16 to get a better undestanding of what the quote actually means.
tl:dr, Lumen Gentium lists groups of people by proximity to the church.
First is Catholics who reside within the church.
Next are non-catholic christians who, although are outside the church, are linked to it by baptism, though they lack communion with the Successor of Peter and may not profess the fullness of the faith.
After that are the Jews, who are more closely related to the church than any other non-christian religion, as they were chosen by God and were the first to receive his revelations.
Muslims, besides polytheists and atheists, are furthest from the church
In the case of Islam, they believe in the virgin birth, in Jesus as the Messiah, in Jesus coming in judgment during the last days, but reject Jesus as the Son of God, reject God as a trinity, and have various other errors in their knowledge of God.
What Lumen Gentium, V2, that quote from the catechism, etc., is NOT saying, is that these religions are alternate paths to salvation. That is firmly repudiated.
In fact, the section that comes after the one containing the quote you mentioned is titled, "Outside the Church there is no Salvation"
Matthew 23:9 And do not call anyone on earth your father; for only One is your father, He who is in heaven.
John 14:6 Jesus sai to him, " I am the way, and the truth, and the life, no one comes to the Father except through me.
Mary can not do anything for you, nor the Pope for that matter.
@@michaelanthony1797 why then do you not take Jn 6 and Jn 20 literally?
So he gets reconsecrated by someone who defies manmade laws in dozens of countries for people who reject Jesus Christ for more than teo thousand years? Why are you suddenly making arguments FOR Vigano, Father?
Sorry but no. Sadly, and I do mean sorrowfully Catholicism ( the church of Jesus Christ, and His Apostle’s) would always echo the words of the first Pope. I am certain that all would agree with the words of St. Peter, and require zero influence of interpretation. The second epistle of St.Peter chapter 2 reads, and I quote” But there were also false prophets among the people, even as there shall be among you lying teachers, who shall bring in sects of perdition, and deny the Lord who bought them: bringing upon themselves swift destruction. 2. And many shall follow their riotousnesses, through whom the way of truth shall be evil spoken of. 3. And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you. Whose judgment now of a long time lingereth not, and their perdition slumbereth not. 4. For God spared not the angels that sinned, but delivered them, drawn down by infernal ropes to the lower hell, unto torments, to be reserved unto judgment.” Have any of you watched the videos on you tube, part 1-3 entitled Our Lady Of Good Success?
Where is proof if his own seminary.
@@michellestansberry9101 are you saying you researched this and could not find anything about it? Or you want someone else to do your research! Almost everything I know about Vigsno I have gotten from Vigano or one of his proppers like TM or JHW
Can’t listen to you anymore!!!
@@ral3190 perfectly ok with me.
The pride is ozzing out of you
Former Archbishop Vigano was excommunicated because he denied Pope Francis,and not because he do some comment about the holo...
You set bacwards on your horse😄
Don't take the way some other direction.
It's so pathetic ....
All I hear from Francis supporters is hatred and self-righteous judgement.
Taylor Marshall, Fr. Murray, Fr Murr, Tim Gordon, Anthony Stine, Fatima Center etc. etc. etc.
If Vigano does not believe Vatican 2, then why he became a priest under vatican 2? What a liar! He should be ordained under opportunist 2.