The last caller, Andrew, had asked the question most people in this country want to hear the answer to. Why won’t the police, government representatives and the media say where these trouble makers or law breakers ,originate from. Why does there appear to be a ban on words like, Ethnic, Illegal Migrants or Legal Immigrants and of course Muslims. What is wrong with these words?
I don’t know how old you guys are but Peter conducted a clear interview wanting to know the situation allowing John the final say on what he wanted to say. That’s good journalism. I’m in my 5th decade in life & Peter’s journalism approach is well appreciated & drills down on issues.
@@midnightsparesnot sure what our respective ages have to do with airing our views , and as I typed , Peter is a balanced presenter /reporter , however , it felt like he was trying to catch John out , there was almost an air of ambush about the interview , and yes, Peter did give John the chance to have one last word , and rightly so , I think Peter realised that he would get a backlash from the majority of his listeners otherwise
How is this fella able to get his shoes on the correct feet? Politicians do listen but do nothing what fecking help is this. We have been ignored but they are listening now that a bit of violence has been produced by people who apparently cannot articulate their concerns. Sit up pay attention and do something.
omg if that was one of us British people carrying
something illegal we would have been arrested on the spot and given prison time !!!
The last caller, Andrew, had asked the question most people in this country want to hear the answer to. Why won’t the police, government representatives and the media say where these trouble makers or law breakers ,originate from. Why does there appear to be a ban on words like, Ethnic, Illegal Migrants or Legal Immigrants and of course Muslims. What is wrong with these words?
Well said
Marty Australia
We got what 30% voted for.
Peter is usually balanced , but he jumped on that bloke John towards the end of his show , it was like he was trying ambush him
Yes he came across as bias and does not get causes or what people are trying to say or going on at the moment
I don’t know how old you guys are but Peter conducted a clear interview wanting to know the situation allowing John the final say on what he wanted to say. That’s good journalism. I’m in my 5th decade in life & Peter’s journalism approach is well appreciated & drills down on issues.
@@midnightsparesnot sure what our respective ages have to do with airing our views , and as I typed , Peter is a balanced presenter /reporter , however , it felt like he was trying to catch John out , there was almost an air of ambush about the interview , and yes, Peter did give John the chance to have one last word , and rightly so , I think Peter realised that he would get a backlash from the majority of his listeners otherwise
I fear an uprising in our not for much longer green and pleasant land if left in the hands of Starmer and his cohorts.
How is this fella able to get his shoes on the correct feet?
Politicians do listen but do nothing what fecking help is this.
We have been ignored but they are listening now that a bit of violence has been produced by people who apparently cannot articulate their concerns.
Sit up pay attention and do something.
He just asked for politicians to be honest 😂😂😂 he has lost his marbles.
I wonder if he got the extra 4000 police from the hotels and mosques
If not now when
Disgraceful two tier policing 😡
Omg.. Are you just talking about PATRIOTS ??
Talk TV is our new racist tv
Ask , galaway he will sum it clearly.!
Alex you old boss is going to get the blame for all this.