Worlds FIRST axial flow model jet engine

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 8 вер 2024
  • This is the first commercial model jet engine to feature an axial flow compressor, the compressor section is a 4 stage axial with a single stage axial turbine, this prototype was designed to prove that it could be done in model form.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,1 тис.

  • @peter-e2q
    @peter-e2q 5 років тому +257

    Brilliant. And no irrelevant background music!

    • @ArcturanMegadonkey
      @ArcturanMegadonkey  5 років тому +26

      Irrelevant background music is horrid on any youtube video where it's not necessary! and it would drown out the music of the engine!
      I have a few other turbine tests on my channel and there will be more in the future.
      all the best and thanks for watching and commenting
      Paul

    • @peter-e2q
      @peter-e2q 5 років тому +7

      @@ArcturanMegadonkey Someone with the same views, And loves engines... heaven! :)

    • @stephenlarkin3690
      @stephenlarkin3690 5 років тому +4

      Oh, there was music alright.

    • @jdjdjdif9777
      @jdjdjdif9777 4 місяці тому

      Dou you want to recommand one?

  • @erikjohnson2976
    @erikjohnson2976 8 років тому +13

    Damn! That is truly impressive engineering and machining. Beautifully done. This takes microjets to the next stage (actually, four stages).

  • @TheFlyingBusman
    @TheFlyingBusman 5 років тому +11

    Well, I’m impressed on several levels. Firstly the incredibly precise engineering to scale this down but then the physics of getting it to fire up and run so well. A credit to you for building such a fab little turbine.

    • @ArcturanMegadonkey
      @ArcturanMegadonkey  5 років тому +2

      At the time of running it did surge at a point but I understand now it has been sorted.

    • @waspsnest
      @waspsnest 2 роки тому

      @@ArcturanMegadonkey only partly, it can run faster before it starts surging but its still there.

    • @kaboom-zf2bl
      @kaboom-zf2bl 6 місяців тому

      @@ArcturanMegadonkey what was the thrust at max throttle ... RPM has no meaning beyond it spinning fast ... how hard it pushes (THRUST) ... is what matters

  • @bernardolozano7429
    @bernardolozano7429 5 років тому +12

    You sir are a genius the only jet engine models I’ve seen so far have centrifugal compressors. Godspeed!

  • @zebby60
    @zebby60 5 років тому +4

    Massive hat tip to the designers, engineers, manufacturing, machining. Bloody impressive

  • @thethirdman225
    @thethirdman225 8 років тому +153

    Next project: afterburner!

    • @Yuri-gg6nv
      @Yuri-gg6nv 5 років тому +3

      It's just injecting aditional fuel into the Combustion chamber... nothing special

    • @jamesburleson1916
      @jamesburleson1916 5 років тому +43

      @@Yuri-gg6nv Afterburners inject fuel into the exhaust, actually. They rely on unspent oxygen in the air, which is why modern supersonic jets use low bypass turbofans, rather than turbojets. The bypass air delivers much more oxygen to the tailpipe allowing more fuel to be burned in the afterburner, and thus more thrust.

    • @midwestsirens
      @midwestsirens 5 років тому

      YES

    • @DiscoR53
      @DiscoR53 5 років тому +3

      TheThirdMan
      Then a variable nozzle.

    • @Pieman6711
      @Pieman6711 5 років тому +1

      @@DiscoR53 Have you put together an AB? Jesus, VENs are a pain in the ass to assemble. Don't get me started on pri flaps and seals, or the actual VEN plates themselves. Not to mention you're gonna need a pressurized system to actuate all the actuators, and a transmitter...
      Anyways, fuck VENs. Sorry, salty sailor here.

  • @whtstr2133
    @whtstr2133 7 років тому +40

    Now THAT is a beautiful little machine. I've seen so many homebrews that this jet engine makes look SO bad. Heck the fire control alone is so badass, it's not even funny. Thank you for showing this. I feel justified being so critical of my own designs to such a degree, I'm motivated to build again. You are a lucky dog, having such a work of art that sounds just as beautiful as it looks. I'm truly astounded at such beauty. : )

  • @RobWhittlestone
    @RobWhittlestone 8 років тому +214

    Beautiful construction. What are the specific data? Weight, thrust, N1/N2 max, consumption etc. Cost? ;-) What is the lubrication solution for the bearings? Service life?
    I would love one. It would sit in the lounge and I would run it every day. My wife will be delighted!
    All the best, Rob

    • @hugostiglitz6914
      @hugostiglitz6914 5 років тому +3

      Don't think it would have an N2, I think it's a single stage motor!

    • @autogolazzojr7950
      @autogolazzojr7950 5 років тому +3

      Looks like a single spool engine

    • @bruceburns1672
      @bruceburns1672 5 років тому +20

      Must be great to have such an understanding wife , you are a lucky man , usually at your age they are well gone after getting half the money or more from the sale of the house you broke your back and worked on every weekend for 50 years , but they do need to discover themselves in Tibet or something after the hard life in the Western world bringing up one child .

    • @2x4barrels40
      @2x4barrels40 5 років тому +7

      @@bruceburns1672
      Yes our court system just loves to bend over men . There is no law " YOU GET WHAT YOU WORKED FOR " . They are their own boss all day long and your boss all night long .

    • @ArcturanMegadonkey
      @ArcturanMegadonkey  5 років тому +43

      Sorry for the late reply (2 years, I've been busy)
      We're going to be test running the engine again in the next few months so I'm going to take all your questions and a few others on here and get them answered via subtitle when the next video is published.

  • @xButterSchmalzX
    @xButterSchmalzX 7 років тому +83

    you have some balls to stand next to it during a test run :D
    imagine there is a material weakness at 95000 rpm and this thing blows up

    • @ArcturanMegadonkey
      @ArcturanMegadonkey  7 років тому +31

      YlnMhn we were about 20yds away and left camera rolling

    • @davecrupel2817
      @davecrupel2817 5 років тому +2

      95,000 rpm???

    • @youtubestolemyhandle1
      @youtubestolemyhandle1 5 років тому +3

      Daniel Cannata
      Yes

    • @100GTAGUY
      @100GTAGUY 5 років тому +9

      Daniel Cannata I've seen some of these mini turbines spool as high as 130k RPM during full power run ups. They're crazy lil things haha

    • @mikeconnor3602
      @mikeconnor3602 5 років тому +3

      @@altyee i was thinking the exact same thing, never stand on the side.

  • @AgentJayZ
    @AgentJayZ 5 років тому +9

    It actually sounds a bit like a RR Avon. Nice vid.

    • @ArcturanMegadonkey
      @ArcturanMegadonkey  5 років тому +2

      Thanks mate, funny thing I'm a sub of your channel and if anyone thinks it sounds like another engine it'll be you.
      all the best
      Paul

    • @FirstLast-tx3yj
      @FirstLast-tx3yj 3 роки тому

      @@ArcturanMegadonkey any thrust figures and weight??

  • @thatsoundslikeblue
    @thatsoundslikeblue 5 років тому +4

    Awesome little jet. Also makes me grin when I think of the APUs in passenger jets as just glorified leaf blowers. XD

  • @leokimvideo
    @leokimvideo 7 років тому +3

    Thank God for leaf blowers
    I'm sure Mr Dyson could market this in some way

  • @flaplaya
    @flaplaya 8 років тому +61

    20 really jealous haters gonna hate.. That is a working piece of art.

  • @davem5333
    @davem5333 5 років тому

    A big tip of the hat and pat on the back to anyone who makes a jet engine that runs regardless of design particulars.
    The design and construction of these are very intricate and complicated.
    You have my awe.

  • @Thompsolonian
    @Thompsolonian 8 років тому +65

    This isn't the first, I worked at a concession stand for Scouts at LEAST 15 years back at Roseville, MN where one of the members of the model aircraft club produced axial flow jet engines for models, and yes, he sold them to people, ergo commercially avaialble.

    • @waspsnest
      @waspsnest 8 років тому +1

      do you have any info on this. i saw one in a magazine article called MAT22 in the mid 80s but never saw anything more than that one article.

    • @ArcturanMegadonkey
      @ArcturanMegadonkey  8 років тому +3

      think I got some drawings for mat22 somewhere

    • @waspsnest
      @waspsnest 8 років тому +1

      I had the mag for years, dont know what happened to it. (the magazine or the engine)

    • @michaelmcneil4168
      @michaelmcneil4168 8 років тому +9

      What is the power output of this thing.
      The initial problem never fully solved by Hooker's management was that the axle front end was free to wabble causing compressor instability.
      I think the solution was to add the modern propeller to even the throw, thus producing the High Bypass Turbo Propeller?
      Ernest Hives was not happy with the way things went and found that Hooker was burned out. he forced him to take a leave of absence but Hooker was too upset by then to see the problem.
      So he left Rolls and set up the company that made the Bristol with all the eventual problems caused by Briitsh political mis-management.
      It's a nice machine and I would like one but it doesn't demonstrate the actual problems with axials; which is: The nutation of gyroscopes.
      butikov.faculty.ifmo.ru/Applets/Gyroscope.pdf
      The origin of nutation that accompanies forced precession is ex-plained in detail, with an accent on.....
      Imagine trying to ride a bicycle without wheel rims just a mass of spokes (like a wire brush) they are OK when free to spin but impossible to control in a corner at speed.
      With a vehicle moving off the straight line, the turn causes it to cant over or roll. When that happens in an engine the compression leaks. I think that must be something similar to engine knock and noisy plumbing.

    • @garrycoleman2739
      @garrycoleman2739 7 років тому

      Thomps olonian

  • @Gkuljian
    @Gkuljian 8 років тому

    I wondered when someone would do this. And that's a lot of years of wondering. Beautifully done.

  • @tragictheory
    @tragictheory 8 років тому +11

    Awesome work!!! However this is the internet and we will be needing afterburners. :)

    • @waspsnest
      @waspsnest 8 років тому +6

      shouldnt be a problem, ill get onto it when I get a minute

  • @johngibson9680
    @johngibson9680 8 років тому

    Wow. Just Wow. You have to know what precision crafting is involved to appreciate this, people. This is very different from other model jet engines.

  • @coriscotupi
    @coriscotupi 8 років тому +10

    At last a model jet engine that doesn't sound like a dentist's drill.

  • @cr6925
    @cr6925 8 років тому +2

    Amazing achievement! That engine looks and sounds awesome!!

  • @brandonb417
    @brandonb417 8 років тому +93

    What kind of thrust numbers are you seeing from this?

    • @petea2721
      @petea2721 8 років тому +64

      3

    • @tokagekage
      @tokagekage 8 років тому +48

      I'd say it's more of a 4

    • @rjs2400
      @rjs2400 8 років тому +18

      Don't expect an honest answer. here the thing is set up on ball bearing slides that EXACT purpose, and have the scale located, but oh, no camera shots of the reading. Just "if I recall" loll

    • @sbkenn1
      @sbkenn1 8 років тому +35

      Self sustaining noisemaker ?

    • @ohwell2790
      @ohwell2790 7 років тому

      That is all some people are about is making noise, so let us MAKE noise.

  • @cogidubnus1953
    @cogidubnus1953 8 років тому

    Hi Paul
    I'd be the first to admit that I don't really understand the full significance of what I''m being shown, but am still fascinated by it...thank you
    Dave

    • @ArcturanMegadonkey
      @ArcturanMegadonkey  8 років тому

      it's expensive and sounds and smells nice lol

    • @samueleketorp2628
      @samueleketorp2628 8 років тому

      Axial flow jet engines are more difficult to build since they require lots of small blades, both rotating and static, to be made and adjusted to just the right pitch. A centrifugal compressor on the other hand is of simpler design, more robust but less efficient. I have been waiting for years to see model axial flow jets to be build and shown on youtube. A couple of years ago only centrifugal model jet engines were being made.

  • @pauljs75
    @pauljs75 8 років тому +31

    Somebody finally pulled it off! I thought there was trouble getting axial compression to work at that scale, since the majority of model scale engines seem to have a centrifugal compressor which only gos to axial flow at the expansion stage. The burners still seem large relative to the overall engine though, no other way to drop velocity in that volume while keeping pressure before the reaction nozzles/vanes? Any improvement in function, or are the centrifugal style engines still better?

    • @andreasvogler1875
      @andreasvogler1875 8 років тому +8

      They are cheaper since centrifugal compressors can be cast or cnc milled. Spark erosion is an expensive process.

    • @scrfce123
      @scrfce123 8 років тому +16

      You can mill axial discs from certain billets, too. The reason that turbine wheels are either spark eroded or cast is because inconel and other high nickel alloys are too hard to mill in a practical manner.

    • @EdwardJerezG
      @EdwardJerezG 7 років тому +3

      At this scale, centrifugal compressors are actually more efficient than axial ones, and since they are lighter, cheaper to produce and relatively easier to design, there is simply no reason to use axial compressors on model jet engines.
      The only problem with centrifugal compressors is that their flowrate is lower for a given front area, but you can make up for the thrust loss by using a turbofan configuration instead (might be wrong on this, please correct me if I am).
      A single stage centrifugal compressor will probably achieve a higher pressure ratio than the 4-stage axial compressor used in the turbojet from the video (although I would need numbers to be sure about that).

    • @danvandertorre9280
      @danvandertorre9280 7 років тому

      do you know were there is a site I can go to or some one I can talk to too up size one for an ultralight I am going to build .

    • @m.berrada3696
      @m.berrada3696 7 років тому +1

      another guy managed to make a self sustainable enging with an axial compressor. i think his channel is "niffi2"

  • @grahamj9101
    @grahamj9101 8 років тому +1

    I went to a local model engineering exhibition last weekend, where the Gas Turbine Builders' Association had a stand. They were demonstrating one of their engines outdoors (between the showers). I spoke to the builder of his own-design axial flow engine, which was on display on the stand. At the moment, it is part-built and yet to run. It has a six-stage compressor (PR of 4:1) and the aerofoils are precision cast. On the subject of an intake bellmouth for the engine you show, it is obviously working well enough without it. Nevertheless, it's good practice and an axial compressor is likely to be more sensitive to flow separation than a centrifugal. A bellmouth would significantly reduce the likelihood of flow separation, give the compressor blades an easier ride and might even give a small, measurable increase in thrust.

    • @waspsnest
      @waspsnest 8 років тому

      I dont know if James is ever going to try starting it. its well over 14 years since i went away from the GTBA (i was one of the founding members when it was called the GTBCG in 1990 ish) and it was almost complete then.
      I really dont think it will make any difference with a bellmouth, inlet velocity is now and the first stage rotor is 70mm from the existing inlet lip

    • @grahamj9101
      @grahamj9101 8 років тому +1

      He certainly didn't mention that it had been around that long! How low is the inlet velocity of your machine? You may well be right about the difference a bellmouth would/would not make: it might even encourage the development of the boundary layer, which wouldn't be good, but should be no worse than an airframe intake. My experience on the full-size things is that very small differences can sometimes be beneficial or detrimental, even within drawing tolerances. The first-stage blade profile of the Viper 632, the HP impeller L/E profile of the Gem, the minute differences in profile between GE and R-R manufactured blades/vanes for the Gnome - they all had a significant effect on performance and/or surge margin. Not to prove you/me wrong, but just to experiment, I'd be prepared to buy you a bit of round alum bar (say, 5in dia x 4in long), if you have the facilities to bore it out to the engine's intake diameter and produce a generous bellmouth radius.

    • @waspsnest
      @waspsnest 8 років тому

      it might be worth looking at if only to settle the arguments. I would do it properly and rather than do an add on to the existing inlet ill replace the whole inlet duct with the bellmouth built in as part of the front bearing housing so there are no steps or joints to cause any air disturbance. i have the standard bellmouth curve calcs somewhere here, it would be the same as whats on the other engine that Paul put up on here the same time as this one.
      inlet absolute mach no is (theoretically) 0.45 at max rpm

    • @waspsnest
      @waspsnest 8 років тому

      sorry forgot to say, inlet absolute mach no is (theoretically) 0.45 at max rpm

  • @hardwareful
    @hardwareful 8 років тому +6

    I'm rather sure AgentJayZ would love to have one of these as a model / for exhibition

  • @peterschiller2451
    @peterschiller2451 5 років тому +2

    Fantastic sound, like the big ones. To make it perfect it should have an afterburner. That would be the icing on the cake. First rc jet engine axial flow with afterburner. Nevertheless, great work !!

  • @michaelmeyer6306
    @michaelmeyer6306 8 років тому +17

    Is this a kit you bought or did you design and manufacture it? Don't get me wrong, if it is a kit it still requires some skill to assemble all the way to the running stage. What does it use for fuel? Have you measured the thrust and figured out the thrust to weight ratio? I'm a 20 year USAF jet engine mechanic and that vid is awesome!!!!! So many questions!!!!!

    • @ssss-df5qz
      @ssss-df5qz 8 років тому +1

      I'm guessing not a kit. It looks like a really high quality kit, with a load of design and development behind it, but something about it is too good for any kit to come close.
      If this is a restricted budget hobby garage build out only stands to make me appreciate it so much more. The sound alone is pitch perfect and you just sense how well balanced it is.

    • @michaelmeyer6306
      @michaelmeyer6306 8 років тому +1

      ss ss I agree with you, I'm hoping the owner answers me cause I have many more technical questions to ask. Like: what metal is the turbine made of to withstand the combustion heat and the centrifugal force of 95K RPM? Like you said it looks to be extremely balanced. I'm in awe of this.....

    • @ssss-df5qz
      @ssss-df5qz 8 років тому +1

      +Michael Meyer - not looks balanced, "feels" balanced.
      It's hard to explain, I work a lot with cars and trucks and you just tune in to sounds and vibrations, like a sixth sense. It's like a full body sensory thing.
      When everything is balanced and audibly smooth.

    • @ssss-df5qz
      @ssss-df5qz 8 років тому

      +Michael Meyer - it must be titanium? I have no idea. My friend has a little blade out of a Concorde engine.. about 6 inches it is, titanium, precision, light. They put up with a lot either way so need to be strong.

    • @michaelmeyer6306
      @michaelmeyer6306 8 років тому +2

      ss ss No looks, if it wasn't everything on that stand would have been jumping around. Titanium is what was used on the engines I worked on. Pretty expensive though, pretty hard to fabricate with too. I wonder if it has any stall control? The TF-33 engine on the B52-H would stall with even a mild crosswind or if you moved the throttle too fast. There was even a button on the yoke to manually open the bleed valves if the engines were stalling. With that small inlet probably not a big problem.

  • @creativityworld6781
    @creativityworld6781 5 років тому +1

    I really like it.. how much thrust generated? and please post some videos of your work steps

  • @KarriKoivusalo
    @KarriKoivusalo 8 років тому +5

    Stellar work, truly a remarkable feat of engineering and high precision handicraft! Four stages isn't a whole lot for axial compressor, I wonder how much is the overall pressure ratio?

    • @waspsnest
      @waspsnest 8 років тому +2

      design PR is 2.5:1 but its only acheiving 2.3 so far

    • @KarriKoivusalo
      @KarriKoivusalo 8 років тому

      Cool, I guessed between those figures :D

    • @alexanderbonardi4514
      @alexanderbonardi4514 8 років тому +1

      Now that you have axial flow you need to work on a proper annular combustion chamber !

  • @Chainspike101
    @Chainspike101 7 років тому

    I love the little ITT gauge in the back haha

  • @gmanbuilder9843
    @gmanbuilder9843 8 років тому +3

    Very nice!!!! Now put it in a plane!!!

  • @joshmnky
    @joshmnky 4 роки тому +1

    Did you manufacture the blades yourself? I had though spark erosion/EDMwould be a great approach for making small turbines. Did you stamp a whole side at once? Come in radially per blade?

  • @grahamj9101
    @grahamj9101 8 років тому +4

    Sorry, no Pan Galactic Gargle Blaster: I couldn't get a booking at the Restaurant at the End of the Universe.

    • @ArcturanMegadonkey
      @ArcturanMegadonkey  8 років тому

      lol nice one

    • @lasersimonjohnson
      @lasersimonjohnson 8 років тому

      +agentjayz is on his way there too...

    • @grahamj9101
      @grahamj9101 8 років тому +1

      How about meeting up with Zaphod Beeblebrox? As they say, "Two heads are better than one!"

  • @zekezero12345
    @zekezero12345 6 років тому

    Ah, the British countryside in early summer! What else could make the heart sing more sweetly..?
    Oh, an axial flow jet engine! :)

  • @shaunwest3612
    @shaunwest3612 8 років тому +3

    cool video,sounds awesome😀

  • @fishingWithHector
    @fishingWithHector 7 років тому

    I kept trying to come up with how you would go about making a diffuser when you're building a model jet engine. And then I saw this video and saw all you did was make the combustion chamber a larger diameter, I have no idea why that didn't hit me. Amazing video

  • @waspsnest
    @waspsnest 8 років тому +7

    nice motor, ill have to get one of those

    • @ArcturanMegadonkey
      @ArcturanMegadonkey  8 років тому +1

      you'll need lots of money lol

    • @DandSCreations
      @DandSCreations 8 років тому

      I'll just run down the the Wal-Mart... It's in the only example in the world section.

    • @waspsnest
      @waspsnest 8 років тому

      nah ive got 5 more like it at home

    • @DandSCreations
      @DandSCreations 8 років тому

      not AXIAL flow

    • @waspsnest
      @waspsnest 8 років тому

      no ive only got 1 1/2 of those

  • @backyardmechanic921
    @backyardmechanic921 8 років тому +4

    A clever piece of work, do they use ceramic bearings? I can't imagine metal ones would stand the heat for long.

  • @zavatone
    @zavatone 8 років тому +4

    World's first.
    Worlds = more than one world

    • @henryscp318
      @henryscp318 5 років тому

      u know that" 's "means "is" because so u wrote "World is first"

  • @paulstovall3777
    @paulstovall3777 6 років тому

    Beautifully designed and built piece of machinery. I used to work on the big Pratt & Whitneys and G.E.'s. I love jet engines. Thx.

  • @dredrotten
    @dredrotten 8 років тому +3

    Wow that is so Excellent.96,000rpms makes me think its a very expensive bought one,I mean how would you balance each turbine blade to those specs in your shed?

    • @waspsnest
      @waspsnest 8 років тому +1

      where would you buy it from?
      they were ballanced on the Sheneck ballancer that sits in the corner of the build area

    • @glendooer6211
      @glendooer6211 5 років тому

      How many minutes in RPMs? 60??

  • @barracuda7018
    @barracuda7018 7 років тому

    Axial flow engines, the greatest technological breakthrough in jet propulsion , the concept was first pioneered by Maxime Guillaume in France 1921 , the first operational engine Jumo004 was built by Germans to power the worlds first operational jet fighter Me262 ...

  • @terryblankinship2192
    @terryblankinship2192 7 років тому +42

    this guy desighns a axial flow turbine and it runs n seems to run well and its in its desighn infancy n no one gives him anything but critical pissing and whining, if no one ever took a chance and stood close to there own projects when there was a chance of failuire nothing would have ever been accomplished, there was zero viberation that could be seen and overaul it seemed very smooth and the turbine wheels were all made using spark erosion so some company that builds turbine wheels/blades obviously machined the rotating assembles so I'm gonna assume things where in order as for possiable failures and say it was just as safe s a jetcat powered bicycle lol or turbine jet, I don't run jetcat stuff because I like my wren and I jets black mamba better, also my bairds turbine which the owner of the ijets black mamba has helped me keep running lol,

    • @ReggieRailSystems
      @ReggieRailSystems 5 років тому +1

      terry blankinship, I agree with you. And if it disintegrates while under power and he should survived Then without question he will learn a valuable lesson that nobody could ever instill in him. That’s life!

  • @keukenrol
    @keukenrol 8 років тому

    Those small jet engines are just lovely to see and hear. A true masterpiece indeed!

  • @neardood1
    @neardood1 8 років тому +8

    Very cool.. How much thrust does it produce?

  • @brandonjohnson8880
    @brandonjohnson8880 7 років тому +1

    I'd never stand so close to something like this unless it had kevlar somewhere near the compressor and turbine to protect the user from blade failure.

    • @0623kaboom
      @0623kaboom 6 років тому

      then dont sit behind you car steering wheel ... that is even more dangerous than a jet engine possibility of blade failure .... your car is more likely to blow up before a turbine blade will fail and shoot out the side of the engine

  • @StormSilvawalker
    @StormSilvawalker 8 років тому +5

    is this a radial or central combustion chamber system and if it is radial is it multiple segments or just one chamber?
    whilst it is a beautiful machine and a truly amazing accomplishment did not "niffi2" build an axial flow model jet engine 2 years ago?

    • @philippwetter
      @philippwetter 8 років тому +1

      Thats what I thought too! Niffi2 got it to work 2 years ago and with 6 Stages

    • @waspsnest
      @waspsnest 8 років тому

      its an anular combustor. Idid write to mr niffi2 but no reply yet

    • @waspsnest
      @waspsnest 8 років тому +1

      the actual first run of this compressor and turbine was a good 5 years ago but it originally had a centrifugal compressor 5th stage and two stage axial turbine. I do have a vid of its first run on here but its listed as private.
      i built this mostly to rescue the axial rotors and prevent them ending up in the scrap bin, also to prove to myself that a small fully axial machine can be built that runs well and starts easily. the next (much cheaper) version is already under development if only in the back of my head for now. will be real and available one day

    • @StormSilvawalker
      @StormSilvawalker 8 років тому

      +tigercat scratch awesome! do you have any advice for someone starting to build one (where to find the math such as ratios of intake d to combustion chamber hole d)?

    • @calfpv5973
      @calfpv5973 8 років тому +1

      Hi, I'm interested in building an axial flow turbojet myself and whilst I doubt I'm a whole lot further along the line than you are, if you haven't already seen the Rolls Royce Jet engine book you should look for that, as well as the resources on the MiT and NASA websites which provide a few equations. That said, I am also struggling to find equations.... the axial flow compressor article on wikipedia has a few but it's certainly a huge task with a LOT of research required. Hope that helps a little...

  • @davejohnson8960
    @davejohnson8960 5 років тому

    What's not to LOVE about the sound of a turbine?!?!?

  • @JamesHurd
    @JamesHurd 8 років тому +15

    Quiet little thing isn't she. not like other RC types! very nice bit of kit tho..

    • @waspsnest
      @waspsnest 8 років тому +10

      yes, very little compressor whine. there are 250 blades in there so Im wondering if the pitch goes beyond human hearing range. all I can hear is the rush of air going down the intake. its all completely drowned out by the leaf blower and thats only running at idle. the only idea of speed i get is from the rpm sensor or pressure gauge if its attached.

    • @ristomladich246
      @ristomladich246 8 років тому

      more then likely.

  • @thesquisheee
    @thesquisheee 5 років тому

    Now that is a thing of beauty. Looks like you're getting a bit of a hotspot at the bottom of the turbine tho.

    • @waspsnest
      @waspsnest 5 років тому

      thats from starting with compressed air, it dosent spool up as far as with the blower so had to drag the speed up with the fuel

  • @sunsheep257
    @sunsheep257 8 років тому +19

    this isnt the first RC axial compressor Turbine.... The title is misleading.
    Edit:
    saw the info: “commercial“ - ok still misleading title

    • @saito125
      @saito125 8 років тому +1

      Mind posting a link to the first one?

    • @rogerturner5504
      @rogerturner5504 8 років тому +6

      What is wrong with you? Why can't you just say 'Brilliant achievement - well done'. I agree with saito125.

    • @saito125
      @saito125 8 років тому +7

      Roger Turner
      , this behavior is typical of no-doers. They sit, watch and wish they could. But they can't.

    • @ioaircraft
      @ioaircraft 8 років тому +8

      comment is still accurate. it is not the first axial flow turbine. i have the first posted on my channel. and i am definitely a doer. one of the most known in rc jets, on planet earth. thanks.

    • @ioaircraft
      @ioaircraft 8 років тому +1

      man, that brings back memories too. posted that video 5 years ago. LOL

  • @thenewnerdtrucker
    @thenewnerdtrucker 5 років тому +1

    Cool little engine. I won’t be that guy to throw unsolicited advice into the mix. But it’s definitely a cool build! Bet it was a lot of fun, no?

  • @siratthebox
    @siratthebox 8 років тому +3

    That casing doesn't look strong enough to contain a blade failure.

    • @waspsnest
      @waspsnest 8 років тому +2

      snapped blades dont take much to contain them, its been tested on a seperate compressor rig. its broken turbine discs that could have a chance of coming out the side, very unlikely for the compressor end though

  • @DistractedTrader
    @DistractedTrader 8 років тому

    that shutdown sound though.. music to my ears!

  • @CradyLab
    @CradyLab 8 років тому +3

    Soooooooooooo pretty!

  • @grahamj9101
    @grahamj9101 8 років тому

    It appears to be a beautifully made little machine - and it works. My only suggestion would be that, for ground running like this, it could do with a bellmouth added to the intake, similar to the Barjay.

    • @ArcturanMegadonkey
      @ArcturanMegadonkey  8 років тому +1

      not sure whether it does as it's axial compressor against centrifugal

    • @waspsnest
      @waspsnest 8 років тому

      it sort of has one. the elliptical nose cone helps and theres a decent sized 270 degree radius on the inlet lip.
      inlet velocity is not that fast so im not too concerned about the flow seperating

  • @rinzl3rs349
    @rinzl3rs349 8 років тому +4

    considering this is not the first. hate when people put worlds first. fucking click bait

  • @chrisspekking8535
    @chrisspekking8535 5 років тому

    You’ve done yourself proud. Brilliant job.

    • @ArcturanMegadonkey
      @ArcturanMegadonkey  5 років тому

      Wasn't built by me but a friend and yes he has done a brilliant job

  • @PetesShredder
    @PetesShredder 8 років тому +22

    Make a model turbofan!!!

    • @bpresgrove
      @bpresgrove 8 років тому

      There are a few videos out there if turbo fans I think. I though someone built a twin engine. Could be wrong.

    • @Tomtom88983
      @Tomtom88983 8 років тому

      Technically a turbojet, a turbofan has bypass air whilst a turbojet like what you see in this video does not have bypass air (air going around the engine via an external fan)

    • @DSTEngines
      @DSTEngines 8 років тому

      Ewald Schuster build one! Since a few weeks my Turbofan engine is ready to run on idle. Still idle because the fanblades are plastic concepts for now. In a few weeks I will make the Fanblisc ;) Than I will upload a video.

    • @ekingorgu
      @ekingorgu 7 років тому

      Did you build it yet?

  • @RDCST
    @RDCST 6 років тому +1

    For a few seconds I thought that I was about to see the first table that cross the sound barrier.

  • @GG-sw4ws
    @GG-sw4ws 8 років тому +3

    is that hemlock behind the engine?

    • @waspsnest
      @waspsnest 8 років тому

      who/ what you on about mate?

    • @nefariumxxx
      @nefariumxxx 8 років тому

      I noticed too and yes I think so...

    • @waspsnest
      @waspsnest 8 років тому +1

      the plants?
      sorry if its not got a turbine attached I dont have a clue about it

    • @nefariumxxx
      @nefariumxxx 8 років тому

      tigercat scratch useless trivia perhaps but yes, they are poisonous: www.kingcounty.gov/environment/animals-and-plants/noxious-weeds/weed-identification/poison-hemlock.aspx

    • @nefariumxxx
      @nefariumxxx 7 років тому

      Yeah we used to see it all the time as kids. I remember it had a spicy kind of smell to the flowers. Fortunately not an appetizing smell or we might have eaten it. ha ha.

  • @gordonwbell
    @gordonwbell 6 років тому

    My god that thing is pure bliss! I’m currently working on my own version, started in 2012, shelved it, then recently back at it, although I’ve being using a lot of formulas from Tomas Kamps Model Jet engines book, a lot of the gas theory I’ve taken from my school days of Mechanical engineering, and google, but long story short, I think I’ve managed to make the math work for a single stage compressor, with a 1.4 compressor ratio. Although I realize I still have a lot of engineering still to do, until get any where what you’ve built. I’m also trained on using UG NX4, solid modelling software, and did a first year machinist apprenticeship, although that’s several years ago now. Would love to collaborate on something. They now have 3D printed carbon fibre technology that’s fairly cheap now a days, for a compressor. Anyways cheers

  • @Tsukuyomi2
    @Tsukuyomi2 5 років тому +4

    U.S. Air Force would like to know your location

    • @ArcturanMegadonkey
      @ArcturanMegadonkey  5 років тому

      The designer of this engine is hunted by many engine manufacturers

  • @mauricetucker6354
    @mauricetucker6354 7 років тому

    that spool down is so sweet and epic

  • @olivierl6070
    @olivierl6070 8 років тому +4

    Sorry to burst your bubble but that ain't the first. Jaguar made one decades ago

    • @ckbne
      @ckbne 8 років тому +4

      sorry to burst your bubble but Jag didn't. it was made by two brothers from the isle of man and jag was going to use it in their cars as a psu top up plant for hybrid.
      Great work on the engine mate, look very professional, you should be proud of it.

    • @olivierl6070
      @olivierl6070 8 років тому +1

      ckbne True, but my point is still valid.

    • @YARCHLRL
      @YARCHLRL 8 років тому +3

      and is Jaguar a "model jet" because that is what the title says.

    • @olivierl6070
      @olivierl6070 7 років тому

      ***** Well yours might be a greater achievement in the circumstances but it's not the first small scale axial flow engine

  • @PortraitArtPhoto123
    @PortraitArtPhoto123 8 років тому +2

    Very nice. Now make it into a turbofan : ) It would be nice not to burn through a gallon of kero every flight. That's an awesome looking project!

  • @kartherton
    @kartherton 5 років тому +1

    Things more forward for us all,dew to people like you. Salute. 👍

  • @coreyschmidt1647
    @coreyschmidt1647 5 років тому +1

    Need to build a RC F-15 to put that beautiful piece of machinery in.

  • @skeptical_thinkers
    @skeptical_thinkers 8 років тому

    "Holy shit" is an understatement. This is seriously impressive.

  • @ChickenHawk110
    @ChickenHawk110 8 років тому

    Amazing work for your own design and construction. Truly.
    Can't agree that it is the worlds first though. Quite a number of hobby enthusiasts have built their own with varying success ~2012 - 2016, and as far as the "commercial" aspect is concerned, Bladon Jets produced one around ~2010, and AFAIK Jaguar Cars helped sponsor the prototype.
    Allegedly the prototype first ran in 2004, and they eventually got to ~100lb after spending $1.5M in awarded funding.

  • @Flightstar
    @Flightstar 4 роки тому

    my dream model jet is a high bypass fan powered by a axial turbine core with a decent compression ratio for optimized fuel efficiency.

  • @steventhornton4716
    @steventhornton4716 3 роки тому

    Very impressive little jet well done mate

  • @rafmanangleseygwynedd8026
    @rafmanangleseygwynedd8026 8 років тому +1

    hi Paul, its amazing how much the sound sounds like a jet stood there, brilliant ,I thought it was going to take off, when the draw front started to move forward, now clamp it back onto your bike. ( again ) great video lol 👌🚀😃📷

    • @ArcturanMegadonkey
      @ArcturanMegadonkey  8 років тому +2

      lol if you knew how much it cost to build......

    • @SteamDougy
      @SteamDougy 8 років тому +3

      if you have to ask...you can't afford it! ;)

  • @brendendas
    @brendendas 8 років тому +1

    Jesus f**king christ! This is one of the best homemade engines I've seen!

  • @GonzoDonzo
    @GonzoDonzo 8 років тому

    wasnt there a company who made axial jet engines years ago?i believe they had an 80 pounds of thrust and 150 pounds of thrust models. i think they went under now but i remember their 2 engines they sold. too bad the efficiency goes out the window when they get so small. really pretty work though. loved the interior shot of the compressor. would love to see the turbines and combustion chamber

  • @mtacoustic1
    @mtacoustic1 6 років тому

    I believe K&B hobbies worked on an axial flow turbojet back in the 1960's. Don't recall if they got it to run.

  • @kevinbyrne4538
    @kevinbyrne4538 8 років тому

    BEAUTIFUL craftsmanship.

  • @jwholmes2
    @jwholmes2 8 років тому +2

    It's really great workmanship. How about some data? Pressure ratio, airflow, thrust?

  • @byrondot
    @byrondot 8 років тому

    An impressive archivement. Kudos to all involved.

  • @iWolfgangEngineering
    @iWolfgangEngineering 3 роки тому

    According to the view counter,... I'm viewer 999,999....lol. I welcome this video to the 1 million view club. The jet engine was pretty cool also. ; )

  • @DSTEngines
    @DSTEngines 5 років тому

    Nice shut down noise. love it :)

  • @lukaspfalz6128
    @lukaspfalz6128 5 років тому

    Would it be possible to see a breakdown for the engine? Knowing about how you designed and manufactured the parts could give a lot of us newbs insight to developing our own home-brews.

  • @simontalbot-hurn9457
    @simontalbot-hurn9457 8 років тому

    That is on the superb side of awesomeness...!!!

  • @GoUSA111
    @GoUSA111 8 років тому

    Very nice... next up, the high bypass version of fan jet..

  • @RandoWisLuL
    @RandoWisLuL 7 років тому

    it sounds so good......i love the sounds of all jet engines but this design has such a satisfying clean sound.

  • @snaprollinpitts
    @snaprollinpitts 8 років тому

    cool!!! now all you need is an auto start. well done!!!

    • @waspsnest
      @waspsnest 8 років тому

      im not going to put an electric starter on it just yet. the front bearing is too exposed to dirt or bits of oring from the clutch. the next generation will be full autostart

  • @HuntingTarg
    @HuntingTarg 8 років тому

    2:25 I see a thermal problem on the ventral side of the exhaust cone. I imagine that if it were not a stationary test, airflow of movement would address that?

  • @davegtar
    @davegtar 8 років тому

    Genuinely sounds like a hair dryer, Pretty awesome though :) I'd really love to see a model turbo fan jet

  • @mkmdexplorationparanormal5610
    @mkmdexplorationparanormal5610 6 років тому

    Have you seen the Meteor jet engine on the back of a van ? I think the guy ownes one in Australia, fires it up just for fun, blows trees branches from hundreds of yards away, pretty impressive to see, look it up, jet engine on van, I will try find the link for you mate

  • @StrokerAce3983
    @StrokerAce3983 8 років тому

    did you do all or at least most of the machine work? I like the aluminum plate and all the mounting hardware. Tt looks to be some nice machining work done good job on this dude.

  • @Grobbekee
    @Grobbekee 8 років тому

    That would make a cool leafblower!

  • @mikegpo1
    @mikegpo1 8 років тому +1

    Holy crap too much time on your hands Paul !! lol Brilliant

    • @ArcturanMegadonkey
      @ArcturanMegadonkey  8 років тому +2

      lol I wish, was filming it for a friend who built it

    • @dobiem1
      @dobiem1 8 років тому

      Great Job!
      What kind of fuel consumption does the engine use?

  • @jolujo5842
    @jolujo5842 8 років тому +2

    Ever measured the total lbs of thrust? I see you have it mounted on a linear bearing assembly. That makes me think you've been measuring output.
    Just curious.
    Cheers 😀

  • @user-yl4ty8cq8w
    @user-yl4ty8cq8w 8 років тому +2

    Congratulations on creating a functional iteration of such a complicated piece of technology! I notice that this design incorporates a rather large looking combustor section; is that related to this miniaturized example being uniquely operational?

    • @ArcturanMegadonkey
      @ArcturanMegadonkey  8 років тому +1

      combustion chamber would have been designed to be suited to the compressor section

  • @KP_79
    @KP_79 5 років тому

    So this is what’s inside those infomercial vacuums nice

  • @Ubernator
    @Ubernator 8 років тому

    You should make a series on how you made this engine, in the same veil of ClickSpring. Clickspring is a home machinist who has recently made a clock, search for him on youtube. If you made a series like that for this engine I would die.

  • @metaforest
    @metaforest 6 років тому

    The problem with RC scale Axial compressors is that airflow doesn't scale down. This boundary layer issue has to be death with by completely redesigning the shapes of the rotor and stator blades. The traditional shapes just don't work once the dominant flow in the compressor is boundary layer limited.

  • @Ubernator
    @Ubernator 8 років тому

    please make a build video, or a tear down and rebuild would be great also

  • @yamilandres
    @yamilandres 7 років тому

    man.. I love the sound of that small engine!

  • @timothysvec8568
    @timothysvec8568 8 років тому

    Well done Sir..... Well done!