After Starfield I no longer care what Developers say about their game. It's not like they're going to say, "oh yeah, we made bad choices, and this is a bad game". Now I just wait for reviews after release, and I never pre-order or rush in to buy on release.
It's really just a triple AAA game thing. Rarely do you see it with AA or A games that can do very well compared to their supposed "Better" counterparts.
The way they describe the open world starting small and growing and growing makes it sound like the outer worlds. You start on one planet, then get access to another then another. You don’t have access to the full map until you progress the story
Mercenaries: Playground of Destruction had a very similar factional progression system for getting better vehicles, weapons and territorial friend or foe status. That game system was AWESOME!!! Hope they pull it off in this game
When you watch the Tatooine segment, you can tell when Kay rides out towards the gangster's hideout, that after a point it "loads" through cutscenes until she arrives and dismounts the speeder bike. Nothing wrong with that at all except that doesn't count as open world. Ubisoft should stop using the term "open world" that's all.
Or mabey tattooine is a linear area because not all the planets are gonna be open also you can’t call any game open world because how much loading is in starfield or how many zones that have to load are in Witcher 3
@@StellaSable4891 or maybe they just added that to transition scenes in game or out of game better it has a map where you can see everything so you can probably go anywhere on tatooine on speeder
The idea of a Star Wars game starting out small, then opening up to larger and larger, and having five planets - that made me think of KoToR. Im sure many, many games have followed this formula, but I thought of KoToR because of Star Wars. Of course, KoToR wasn't open world, but you start out in the Republic ship, then spend some time on Taris (first just the upper level, then opening up the lower levels as well), and then when you get the Ebon Hawk, you have four or five planets you can choose from.
@@JL-sc5my Assassins Creed Shadows. Where they display a replica of Zorro’s katana from one piece at the Japanese expo in Pari, and got both laugh at for having barely anyone interact with their booth and got lambast for trying to pass Zorro’s Katana off as something from Japanese history.
The greatest win for Outlaws as a space open world game compared to Starfield - *TRANSPARENCY* 1. They're showing upfront what it would look like to land on a planet - select from a list of locations, but seamless transitions 2. They've confirmed that on a speeder it would take 4-5mins to traverse any zone. This is such a better approach than the fake 1000 world marketing by Bethesda.
Apparently this game as a whole is close to the size of odyssey and that game was massive as a whole… This game will also have expansions with more content, Besides the hate Ubisoft continues to get I think this game has the chance to be waaayy better than people are giving it credit for… do I think it’s gonna be game of the year? Probably not, But I think it’s gonna be a very solid game… I guarantee if this game is actually good people will still hate on it because it’s Ubisoft, 100% people will not come out and say “you know what this game was actually pretty good”… So no matter what, I think this game is screwed when it comes to getting a fair shot on it’s reviews because people will hate on it regardless, Like I said because it’s Ubisoft…. Also this game will require an online connection to download the game and updates but other than that you can play offline, So this whole “Ubisoft is gonna shut it down” argument is hilarious in my opinion… I definitely see some of the worries for this game it’s not 100% perfect, But it’s also not 100% done and most of these gameplay trailers are Xbox Series S ports I’m pretty sure, I have heard this game looks way better on PC, PS5, Xbox Series X… Like I said I think this game will be way better than people think like the people saying “Day one Flop”, “Dead On Arrival”, And all of that bull crap is just pure hate for Ubisoft in my opinion… People Hate Ubisoft so much they cannot see past that hate which i 100% agree Ubisoft deserves the hate they get, But this game doesn’t deserve that hate in my opinion, And again like I said if this game is actually good on day one all of the people that dumped on this game will not have the balls to actually say “this game is actually good”… We shall see when it comes out, I did pre order it because I love Star Wars and in my opinion this game won’t be a dumpster fire, I think it will be good enough where I won’t regret pre ordering it and potentially being pretty happy I did pre order it… There have been games where I didn’t pre order because it looked bad and this game just isn’t that in my opinion…
@@victorcharles27 You're thinking of Outer Worlds. Outer Wilds is an indie artsy exploration/puzzle game with no combat and is widely praised by critics and players alike (as long as you aren't turned off by the premise).
@@jahleel0077 I don’t disagree at all that one does not necessarily mean the other, but SWG and TOR are both open world games (as well as MMOs as you point out)
@@nikolaig1 🤣 and in AC you’re on a horse or a chariot lmao… In this game you’re on a speeder that is going WAY faster, GTA 5 takes around 5-6 minutes to get from one end to the other… Also they are talking about 1 end to the other in a straight line never mind everything else that is around in the north end of the map and the south end of the map, It takes 4-5 minutes to get from east to west… Apparently this game as a whole is close to the size of odyssey and that game was massive as a whole… This game will also have expansions with more content, Besides the hate Ubisoft continues to get I think this game has the chance to be waaayy better than people are giving it credit for… do I think it’s gonna be game of the year? Probably not, But I think it’s gonna be a very solid game… I guarantee if this game is actually good people will still hate on it because it’s Ubisoft, 100% people will not come out and say “you know what this game was actually pretty good”… So no matter what I think this game is screwed when it comes to getting a fair shot on it’s reviews because people will hate on it regardless, Like I said because it’s Ubisoft..
I'm certain that this game is only made because they had assets from Beyond Good and Evil 2. It's similar to the Avatar, where they used Far Cry assets.
Size of the open world isn't always the key... it's what's in the open world. I'd rather a small dense and varied open world over a large mostly empty world. I want Limgrave not the Concreted Snowfield.
I just HATE, that they give us "freedom" to explore but not freedom to create our own character? Do what Mass Effect did where you can use the character shown in trailers or make your own.
The moment i saw UBI stamp and the locked mission behind paywalls i was out , And lets face it this will be hyped then released and forgotten in 2 months . Unless they F things up ..then it will be UA-cam fodder for a year lol
Ghost of Tsushima lets you unlock special strikes by seeking mini bosses and defeating them in combat, so not exactly the first game to tie levelling up with a storyline. Naturally, it was only a small part in Ghost of Tsushima, but we haven't really seen how character progression works in Star Wars: Outlaws. It could be that gaining any skill is tied to a storyline, or you could gradually unlock more skills as you progress in the main story - something that Assassin's Creed games have been doing since the very beginning.
20 year old me would be totally super into this. I was, it was called Star Wars Galaxies at the time. I've been done with Star Wars and Disney for a long time now however. Short of this hitting like Fortnite numbers I don't see myself ever bothering with this and I put 160 hours into SSKTJL. So many other game to play right now and those aren't based on IP's that has hurt my feelings for the past 25 years.
For me, Andor was healing that wound. (Not redeeming Disney or anything, just saying it was soothing the star wars frustration and good quality writing at that.)
Because the core loop is bad. The shooting is sparse and boring; no destructible cover, no dynamic AI, no unique weapons. The core of the gameplay is just outright boring. And it doesn't even have a proper melee system like 007 Everything or Nothing or Sleeping Dogs, instead it's just press-X-to-win, which is super lazy.
That’s not what a core loop is though. That’s just gameplay. A core loop is the set of activities you do which you‘ll repeat numerous times as you play the game and we haven’t even seen what that looks like yet.
"for the first time ever we are getting a fully open world starwars game" Kotor, swotor, some of the lego games. This game wont be any more open world than these.
@jrg3940 Yeah... I feel like that's a massive issue. If it was a Mando game and I had all the Mando tools I could upgrade and unlock... sure... but.. a little gremlin and a pistol? I don't know if I want to even bother with such a weak loadout... oh wait... I don't, I do not at all want to bother, and I won't. Not because the characters a lassy, but because she's a jobber... and I just don't care enough about star wars to deal with that. Manalorians are cool... I would fux wid it. Unrelated... but canceling the Mando game was a really stupid thing to do on EAs part. I understand the decisions with this game, I am not the target audience, but I get it. I do not get canceling a mass market appeal mando/ boba game, absurd.
People really pretend Star Wars is anything without Jedi and sith, playing as some feeble young woman who cant even handle basic weapons well, What a joke.
@@sk8ermGs " feeble young woman", I laughed out loud at the idea of some absolute wet blanket writing this. Also, the two BEST Star Wars properties didn't have Jedi's. Andor and Rogue One. Stay mad though lmao
@@scott_itall8638 exactly, just one blaster is so boring for a game like this, i will give a fair try but it would be better if she had lightsaber and use the blasters as a range weapon
The leveling up mechanic is very much akin to Ghost Recon Breakpoint. Do X amount of things in a certain way [Stealth takedowns, headshots, etc.] but the having to seek out an expert makes doing the side quests actually worth exploring and doing.
Crossing a planet in 5 minutes by speeder isn’t bad. That means it would take 25 minutes to speed across all 5 planets. Isn’t that usually about the size of a large open world map. I’m sure crossing Zelda’s or the Witcher or any assassins creed map takes less than 25 minutes
This is one of those games I'm about to wait till the actual game releases with real reviews so I'll make a decision because I've been burned too many times by Ubisoft
The things i'm going to hate about the lore of this game is that I can guarantee there will be no Tyber Zann featuring (which I know, that's a real wild card but it's the perfect game for him to become canon in) or MUCH more importantly, Prince Xizor whose prowess and control rivaled that of the Emperor himself and he would be an incredible inclusion in this game as he was such a powerful criminal overlord in the legends lore.
Except for you have to have people intelligent enough and with enough drive to develop a sufficient story and sadly that does not seem to exist in the current cadre of game developers. It goes against everything that is profit driven, which seems to be the mission of big game studios. Its not about the art or the fun anymore sadly. I also have a lot of fond memories of star wars legends stuff that i just had to keep in my home collection and remember how it used to be. God i sound like an old guy…..
Why does Luke let them get away with saying it’s open world? Everytime something was “promoted” wrong in Starfield he held nothing back and scolded them for it
From the beginning luke was positive about this game, despite that there are few reason to be positive. Very weird But I know his strategy with all of that: He takes the position of the majority. If most of the people hype a game, he will be positive about it. If not, then he will be "critical" Took a time for me to see through this
It’s a better business model than just being on game pass day 1 (not that they’ll be on game pass for a while anyways). Maximizes profits, gives you a chance to monitor player data, make hotfixes, etc. Then sell on 3rd party marketplaces like Steam, etc. Still, will wait for the first few patches before buying. I’m enjoying FarCry 5 at the moment for the first playthrough
@@bamababy152 Yeah but it's also not far fetched to believe the dev team is proud and excited for people to see what they've done. Look at Hogwarts Legacy. You're telling me those devs weren't passionate about that game?
You can get from one end of the GTAV map to the other in about 2 - 3 minutes with any decent supercar, maybe less. If anyone is bitching about it taking 5 - 6 minutes *on a speeder* and that being *short* - they should start a stopwatch and let it go for 6 minutes, it's a lot longer than you think.
For a whole planet that is short. I didn't time it, but it would probably take ten or more minutes to traverse all of Ghost Recon Wildland's map from one side to the other. So yeah, that's not really that big.
@@Detriax 100% agreed. But it looks like this has even less gameplay mechanics than Ghost Recon, which is quite telling. Unless they whip out something ahead of its release; at least Wildlands had a nice variety of vehicles, weapons, and some poorly designed stealth mechanics. Plus, you had some of the vertical trekking, and sniper opportunities -- doesn't appear as if any of that is present in this Star Wars game.
I haven't seen anything yet that makes this an open world. It looks more linear, with some areas. Even if you can travel planet to planet, they have only show small open areas and set pieces, which I would not call open world. The one spot they showed that could make it the open world they describe in the 4-5 minutes on a speeder bike to travel from one end of a planetary area to another, comparing it to Odyssey and saying it is around 2-3 of Odyssey's zones, which isn't huge, but it is a good size for each planet area. Curiously, they have shown nothing of the open world of that area. When on a planet, do you travel point A to B and only engage with the set pieces and towns they show, or is there a lot to do out there planetside? If so, it's strange they haven't shown anything. If not, why have that big area and market this as open world? Not knocking on it. It's just a point where I don't know what to expect from this. Also, they keep saying its the first open world Star Wars game, but we had Galaxies.
"2-3 of Odyssey's zones, which isn't huge" are you cracked out of your skull? Odyssey was huge, in fact one of the things reviews were critical on was it was TOO big and could have benefitted being concentrated a bit more. Them saying this is several times that size (if true) means the map is massive. What the hell are you on about?
@@fish5645 Take it easy there friend. Some Odyssey zones weren't too too big and some were huge, so there is quite a bit of leeway there. Also I said 2-3 zones, but the devs said "2." Still pretty big, because 5 minutes of travel on a speeder bike is a decent amount of distance. However, not huge, per se, as RDR2 by horse took around 15 minutes to cross, by way of comparison. I'm not even concerned with the size at any rate. 5 minutes to cross is fine. More important is the depth of engagement of that area, or is it mostly empty with a couple of random encounters, because like I said, they have shown literally nothing of the actual open world area.
@@fish5645 Who cares if it's massive with nothing in it? Ghost Recon Wildlands has one of the coolest and largest open world maps with hardly anything exciting to do in it other than the same handful of repetitive missions. They had all these really cool biomes that were large and expansive but nothing unique to indulge in when it came to the gameplay, hazards, enemy variety, or even vehicles. It was a copy-paste job of content throughout richly unique art assets, and it seems like that will be the same thing with this game -- large swathes of repetition spread over a relatively "massive" map.
Me too...Odyssey was my most played game ever until Elden Ring...This Star Wars game doesn't really have me all that excited though...I'm not even sure exactly why, but it's just not appealing to me in the same way...I guess I will wait until it is out in the wild before I make a decision...
Odyssey would have been good if they didn't make it such a pain in the ass to level up during the middle portion of the game without the stupid xp boost. Moving to a level based system killed AC
@@RekashalGames I forgot about that lol. I tend to like grindy games so the slow progression didn't bother me, but I remember a lot of people being very annoyed by it. Hopefully they don't add any "XP boost" to buy, but considering it is Ubisoft I wouldn't be shocked if they had some utility stuff to buy after the game releases.
@@RekashalGames Now that you mention it, I do remember people complaining about that...I never felt underpowered after the beginning areas so I just didn't worry much about leveling...I just never felt like it held me back...I can understand why that would be annoying for some people though, and it's ridiculous that they sell that crap as mtx...I have never once bought a microtransaction, so it never really occurred to me at the time that this is why they slowed the progression...
There are hordes in Days Gone right from the start. You can run into them if you are driving around. They don't show you on your map until later and you don't get the better equipment until later also. Good luck with a handgun and crossbow
What they are discrediting on how to level up isn’t anything novel. Many games do things like that. Ubisoft themselves have been doing it for over 10+ years for example assassin creed black flag. To get some equipment you have to to do main missions like the blow dart you get mid to late game
My bigger concern is how will Outlaws perform on PS5 and Series X. I really hope they don't need to compromise on the visuals and performance to much. I am actually really interested in Outlaws but hesitant because of how badly Jedi Survivor performed on console
@@JaySimms-3lfer like Jane or Steve but on StarWars planets and their wildlife. Would be dope af. Diff modes, explore, stealth, research, photo mode, resource collection, riding, hunting. Endor, Hoth, Naboo, Kashyyyk, Kamino, Tattoine, Dathomir etc etc.
It’s probably a really good game.. I actually used to work for Ubisoft. I worked 13 years on the original far cry franchise. I don’t work there anymore. But one thing I’ve noticed a lot of other games whether it would be far cry or assassins Creed it’s always the same format pacing. The only difference is the story. No with avatar. Avatar in a different skin so I’m wondering if Star Wars is just a another.
I’m just really disappointed that I can’t create my character in a Star Wars game like this. I don’t care about the protagonist being voiced but I really don’t want to play as her.
Guys, remember, it's not the devs that are pushing "not owning games with subs" it's their subscription director. The devs seem like they genuinely care for the game and seem to be having fun. I think this one is worthy.
I really wouldn't have minded the empty planets in Starfield (good for outposts and modders), in fact I'd have like more of the planets we got to be totally empty, if the core planets had been dense with handmade content.
The standard price isn't that bad, yeah it's scummy that we are blocked out of a side quest and some outfits but so fuck we vote with our wallets if we stop giving them the money for little cosmetics ill still buy this as a star wars fan and ill probably enjoy it it seems interesting enough but im not going to take it seriously just appreciate the luxuries we have in life be grateful we have the freedom and spare time to enjoy , create and appreciate art.
I don’t have that much excitement for it, especially considering it’s Ubisoft. But some of the little things like letting you watch the ship fly through the clouds and atmosphere really just goes to show how lazy Starfield was. Yeah they both use “loading screens” for landing on a planet, but one is far more immersive and doesn’t rip you out of the world of the game and also will likely play better
"Open World" is very subjective, how much of each planetry destination is available to explore ... Jedi Survivor was/looks far more open than Fallen Hero which was basically a "dungeon" with large open areas (albeit w very pretty walls much like Bloodborne) ... RDR2, Fallout4, AC Odyssey ... that's expansive open world sand box play ... that said have been wating for the game that puts me into a PS5 n think this might be it ...
The game will be heavily discounted within 12 months. Got Farcry 6 for 80% off 5 months after release. Got AC Valhalla for $12, 20 months after the release. Ubisoft games do not hold value, if you buy this game for $100+ it`s just a waste, even if you like the IP, all you have to do is wait, the game will be better later with patches and fixes anyway, so you`ll be getting a better version of the game for way cheaper.
But like, what else do you do in this game besides pew pew and vroom vroom? I haven’t seen anything yet? Like just talk to NPCS? Idk man, game looks beautiful, but that’s all I get from all the teasers.
@@Tacitus_kilgore_1903 That is not true at all. Uncharted 2 takes a huge dump all over the Jedi Survivor games in terms of story, gameplay, pacing, and level design.
@@maddymcmadingson6296 You're not having fun, though, you're just tricking yourself into playing a subpar game because you refuse to play better games.
@@Billy-bc8pk How are you going to tell me what I do and do not enjoy. I had a blast playing AC Odyssey... Clowns like yourself are the people I'm talking about. Cry more.
Star Wars is so played out as a brand the Survivor series is really the best thing going for the franchise at this point. This game doesn’t look fun or interesting or new, I hope people who are excited for this game are not let down. Just got done with AC Mirage and aside from the end it was pretty meh and the gameplay was so janky. Star Wars and Ubisoft seems like a toxic relationship.
I mean when it comes to days gone. If you find just about any cave there’s a massive horde lol. In every cave basically. You don’t have to wait. But I can guarantee if you try to fight that horde with no LMG you’re cooked.
I have literally zero interest in playing as the main character. I’m certainly going to be skipping it unless reviews say it’s too good to skip. Wish they’d let you choose your character like every other Ubisoft game.
I fear that even if they let you play as a male it would be some soy-infused male like Watch Dogs 2, or a bunch of lame characters, or they would undermine his masculinity like in AC: Valhalla by making him lame and passive. I just don't trust Western studios to make good characters these days.
Why are star wars games so against character creation?! Why is that so crazy of a concept to them! like oh my god I don't want to play as a little girl, we haven't had character creation in a star wars game in knights of the old republic 2 which is insane.
11:05 I'm going to be honest, particularly with Star Wars, I would personally prioritize the amount of planets than the size. I saw a lot of people, back with Jedi Fallen Order, who said the maps were too small. But for me, I was willing to make all the maps in the game a little bit smaller just to have another planet. And I realize I might be in the minority of accepting that tradeoff because they did the opposite in Jedi Survivor. There were less planets to explore but the ones you could were a lot bigger.
Outlaws looks like a fine game. If the story and gameplay is anything near Jedi Fallen Order or Uncharted then it will be a good game. I don't think this game was ever going to be a 10/10 but it could definitely be a 7 or 8/10, which is a god game. People make too many mountains out of molehills these days and that's how we end up with people driving their SUVs driving through the walls at McDonalds over not getting enough ketchup. People need to calm down and stop expecting "heaven on earth" 11/10 in every aspect of life. In the words of the god Zeus... "Chill babycakes." Also, these days we really need to start making the distinction between open world and open zones. Skyrim, Breath of the Wild, Fallout are open world whereas Jedi Survivor, The Outer Worlds (and maybe Starrfield too?) are more open zones/levels and Uncharted is/was just traditional levels/zones. At least, this is my opinion on how we should delineate.
I dont get why people would want a bunch of preocedurally generated planets tbh. I love NMS, but i feel like anyone who's played that game for long enough will start to find most of the planets fairly uniteresting after a while and not really worth exploring
I really hope it is the game they are promoting, because I don’t want to lie i feel that the gameplay is a bit meh. I love the main character movement in a game to be more realistic ,vibrant and a life in a sense like other games TLOU and GOW or Alan wake this makes me feel playing a game i love. For starters i love the environment and hope it to be a life like RDR2. What i mean that these games i mentioned are the best in every aspect so developers should just follow from that and build around it.
Where they done fucked up imho is not allowing players to generate/create their own character. Can't cite "immersion" at me in a Star Wars game when I'm forced to play a Dora the Explorer protagonist with her cutesy alien sidekick. That's the complete opposite of immersion in a game like this for me. If I wanna play a bad ass alien or even droid "outlaw" LET ME.
Your defended by the "Rebel locals" in Ghost Recon Wildlands. So I'm guess the system in this game is similar but with multiple factions instead of just 1.
The last game play looked pretty good to be honest, but I won’t be getting day one, maybe the first sale it has I’ll grab it, unless they blow me away even more
After Starfield I no longer care what Developers say about their game. It's not like they're going to say, "oh yeah, we made bad choices, and this is a bad game". Now I just wait for reviews after release, and I never pre-order or rush in to buy on release.
@RobertA-hq3vz Oh I realized that a long time ago with Cyberpunk.
I mean this has been going on for years. If you havent done this before then its basically your own fault and lack of discipline😂
I exclusively pre-order for Santa Monica Studios and FromSoftware
Comparing anything to starfield is a crime LMAO
It's really just a triple AAA game thing. Rarely do you see it with AA or A games that can do very well compared to their supposed "Better" counterparts.
Ill pick it up 6 months after release 75% off
Yeah but Ubisoft may shut the game down by then.
@@SuperOrangeSauceIts not online so they wont. Wtf
@@Capper_Bra it says everywhere that is requires an online connection.
@@Gehshme
WTF the game is Offline, it's an open world action adventure game, so dont fucking talk if you don't know.
@@CrimsonGamer-bw8ugSo angry.
The way they describe the open world starting small and growing and growing makes it sound like the outer worlds. You start on one planet, then get access to another then another. You don’t have access to the full map until you progress the story
You just described every single open world game ever made besides elden ring
@@seffbones5655you had me in the first half
@@TheCephalon yes but hearing 5 planets thats it. I got more on legostarwars
@@StellaSable4891copying bricks is infinitely easier that making a AAA world, be real
@@awasteofspace-man2668what? That’s not how that works 🤣
I'll take denser planets over more planets any day
Spent five minutes trying to work out what the hell happened to my youtube settings and why everything was at 2x speed :D
Looks like a good 7-8 and that’s perfectly fine
I agree, I’m happy to just experience the world and look at all the things big and small
Lol this will be the biggest flop of the year
What do you think after seeing the gameplay?
Looks boring as hell, like some kids game, it's disney so blank and boring is expected
Mercenaries: Playground of Destruction had a very similar factional progression system for getting better vehicles, weapons and territorial friend or foe status. That game system was AWESOME!!! Hope they pull it off in this game
Used to play the shit out of this on my PS2. Still got the game actually
Good god, that's a nostalgia blast from the past.
If only the sequel wasn't so shit.
I keep my eye on it, but i certainly won't be picking it up until it gets its Steam release (like all other Ubisoft games get eventually).
Isn't it on day 1 game pass not that it's going to matter to me I buy deluxe editions. On things I'm interested in.
When you watch the Tatooine segment, you can tell when Kay rides out towards the gangster's hideout, that after a point it "loads" through cutscenes until she arrives and dismounts the speeder bike. Nothing wrong with that at all except that doesn't count as open world. Ubisoft should stop using the term "open world" that's all.
Or mabey tattooine is a linear area because not all the planets are gonna be open also you can’t call any game open world because how much loading is in starfield or how many zones that have to load are in Witcher 3
@@youngblood71 yeah fear a lot of speeder tracks into cutscenes isn't exploration or open world.
You're on a track. Pretty one but still.
@@StellaSable4891 or maybe they just added that to transition scenes in game or out of game better it has a map where you can see everything so you can probably go anywhere on tatooine on speeder
@@StellaSable4891 did you mean petty one?
The idea of a Star Wars game starting out small, then opening up to larger and larger, and having five planets - that made me think of KoToR. Im sure many, many games have followed this formula, but I thought of KoToR because of Star Wars.
Of course, KoToR wasn't open world, but you start out in the Republic ship, then spend some time on Taris (first just the upper level, then opening up the lower levels as well), and then when you get the Ebon Hawk, you have four or five planets you can choose from.
I guess it's cool they made rocky Dennis a star wars character.
lmfaooooooooooooooooo
Brooooooooooooooo
I just think they should have gone with a Bounty Hunter instead of a Scoundrel
To be fair, elite dangerous has a 1:1 scale of our galaxy, same amount of stars, and you can go anywhere there.
Hopefully it turns out to be a good game so more developers are given the chance to develop Star Wars games
We’re talking about Ubisoft here
@@soundwavegamer2321 look man they have the ability to make some bangers. We just have to wait and see
@@JL-sc5my considering how there lasted Assassin’s Creed projects going. Ya that’s as plausible as a unicorn.
@@soundwavegamer2321 are you talking about the last games or the recent ones?
@@JL-sc5my Assassins Creed Shadows. Where they display a replica of Zorro’s katana from one piece at the Japanese expo in Pari, and got both laugh at for having barely anyone interact with their booth and got lambast for trying to pass Zorro’s Katana off as something from Japanese history.
I’d love to see the plot intercepted a quarter or halfway through where you find out Kay Vess is force sensitive, that’d be dope
The map in Ghost of Tsushima is tiny, but damn was it GOOD.
The greatest win for Outlaws as a space open world game compared to Starfield - *TRANSPARENCY*
1. They're showing upfront what it would look like to land on a planet - select from a list of locations, but seamless transitions
2. They've confirmed that on a speeder it would take 4-5mins to traverse any zone.
This is such a better approach than the fake 1000 world marketing by Bethesda.
They keep saying it’s the first open world Star Wars game. They seem to forget Star Wars galaxies was a thing lol
Apparently this game as a whole is close to the size of odyssey and that game was massive as a whole… This game will also have expansions with more content, Besides the hate Ubisoft continues to get I think this game has the chance to be waaayy better than people are giving it credit for… do I think it’s gonna be game of the year? Probably not, But I think it’s gonna be a very solid game… I guarantee if this game is actually good people will still hate on it because it’s Ubisoft, 100% people will not come out and say “you know what this game was actually pretty good”… So no matter what, I think this game is screwed when it comes to getting a fair shot on it’s reviews because people will hate on it regardless, Like I said because it’s Ubisoft…. Also this game will require an online connection to download the game and updates but other than that you can play offline, So this whole “Ubisoft is gonna shut it down” argument is hilarious in my opinion… I definitely see some of the worries for this game it’s not 100% perfect, But it’s also not 100% done and most of these gameplay trailers are Xbox Series S ports I’m pretty sure, I have heard this game looks way better on PC, PS5, Xbox Series X… Like I said I think this game will be way better than people think like the people saying “Day one Flop”, “Dead On Arrival”, And all of that bull crap is just pure hate for Ubisoft in my opinion… People Hate Ubisoft so much they cannot see past that hate which i 100% agree Ubisoft deserves the hate they get, But this game doesn’t deserve that hate in my opinion, And again like I said if this game is actually good on day one all of the people that dumped on this game will not have the balls to actually say “this game is actually good”… We shall see when it comes out, I did pre order it because I love Star Wars and in my opinion this game won’t be a dumpster fire, I think it will be good enough where I won’t regret pre ordering it and potentially being pretty happy I did pre order it… There have been games where I didn’t pre order because it looked bad and this game just isn’t that in my opinion…
The Outer Wilds had 5 handcrafted planets and that game is a gem❤
Everyone said it's shit😅
@@victorcharles27 You're thinking of Outer Worlds. Outer Wilds is an indie artsy exploration/puzzle game with no combat and is widely praised by critics and players alike (as long as you aren't turned off by the premise).
@derrickcrowe3888 my bad 🤭
@@victorcharles27retard
After The Acolyte disaster, Star Wars needs some good content. Please be good.
Sorry but this is gonna be worse than acolyte even
Saying “for the first time ever we are getting an open world Star Wars game” is absolute BS. Star Wars Galaxies and The Old Republic say hello.
@@brooksobr7952 "Open World Games" and MMOs are two different genres/categories.
@@jahleel0077 I don’t disagree at all that one does not necessarily mean the other, but SWG and TOR are both open world games (as well as MMOs as you point out)
Even Jedi Survivor is kind of an open world
@@brooksobr7952 the real ones know
KOTOR is not open world.
4-5 minutes. On a speeder. Direct. Withtout stopping.
That is more than big enough.
4-5 minutes isnt even passable. Its a joke. Players want more to do and bigger maps. They will add planets on the future
@@nikolaig1 You clearly don't know what you're talking about. 4-5 minutes of straight speeder riding is a lot.
@@andreasheinze9685 it takes 10 -15 to get across a Acmap. Plus i want more area. Come on.
@@nikolaig1 🤣 and in AC you’re on a horse or a chariot lmao… In this game you’re on a speeder that is going WAY faster, GTA 5 takes around 5-6 minutes to get from one end to the other… Also they are talking about 1 end to the other in a straight line never mind everything else that is around in the north end of the map and the south end of the map, It takes 4-5 minutes to get from east to west… Apparently this game as a whole is close to the size of odyssey and that game was massive as a whole… This game will also have expansions with more content, Besides the hate Ubisoft continues to get I think this game has the chance to be waaayy better than people are giving it credit for… do I think it’s gonna be game of the year? Probably not, But I think it’s gonna be a very solid game… I guarantee if this game is actually good people will still hate on it because it’s Ubisoft, 100% people will not come out and say “you know what this game was actually pretty good”… So no matter what I think this game is screwed when it comes to getting a fair shot on it’s reviews because people will hate on it regardless, Like I said because it’s Ubisoft..
I'm certain that this game is only made because they had assets from Beyond Good and Evil 2. It's similar to the Avatar, where they used Far Cry assets.
I love how he had to make sure to mention Oceans 11 AND Oceans 8, as if they were both good movies. And you wonder why people are so cautious.
Ocean 11 was great for its time. Ocean 8? whats that?
Yeah, feels like he was trying to cover his ass.
@@PistolPete1980lol go watch oceans 8 you’re in for a treat
Size of the open world isn't always the key... it's what's in the open world. I'd rather a small dense and varied open world over a large mostly empty world.
I want Limgrave not the Concreted Snowfield.
I just HATE, that they give us "freedom" to explore but not freedom to create our own character? Do what Mass Effect did where you can use the character shown in trailers or make your own.
Not every game has to have character customization
Did you need this ‘freedom’ to create a character in Fallen Order or Survivor? I doubt it.
I prefer premade characters tbh.
Really this isn't a problem it's just that the character we have is so ugly I'd prefer to make my own
The moment i saw UBI stamp and the locked mission behind paywalls i was out , And lets face it this will be hyped then released and forgotten in 2 months . Unless they F things up ..then it will be UA-cam fodder for a year lol
It’s gonna be fodder for a few months for sure it’s already starting
Ghost of Tsushima lets you unlock special strikes by seeking mini bosses and defeating them in combat, so not exactly the first game to tie levelling up with a storyline. Naturally, it was only a small part in Ghost of Tsushima, but we haven't really seen how character progression works in Star Wars: Outlaws. It could be that gaining any skill is tied to a storyline, or you could gradually unlock more skills as you progress in the main story - something that Assassin's Creed games have been doing since the very beginning.
Bud u just have poor comprehension skills 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 this is nit the same as getting upgrades from Leonardo Da Vinci
The division had some of the best environmental story telling..props to that man
20 year old me would be totally super into this. I was, it was called Star Wars Galaxies at the time. I've been done with Star Wars and Disney for a long time now however. Short of this hitting like Fortnite numbers I don't see myself ever bothering with this and I put 160 hours into SSKTJL. So many other game to play right now and those aren't based on IP's that has hurt my feelings for the past 25 years.
What is SSKTLJ?
@@brucepreston3927 suicide squad
@@brucepreston3927 $uicide Squad Kill The Justice League it’s a video game 😊
For me, Andor was healing that wound. (Not redeeming Disney or anything, just saying it was soothing the star wars frustration and good quality writing at that.)
@@Spelljammer1phenomenal series, with season 2 on the way!
I don’t know why but every time I see gameplay for this game I get sleepy.
Because the core loop is bad. The shooting is sparse and boring; no destructible cover, no dynamic AI, no unique weapons. The core of the gameplay is just outright boring. And it doesn't even have a proper melee system like 007 Everything or Nothing or Sleeping Dogs, instead it's just press-X-to-win, which is super lazy.
@@Billy-bc8pk Fast food style games
That’s not what a core loop is though. That’s just gameplay. A core loop is the set of activities you do which you‘ll repeat numerous times as you play the game and we haven’t even seen what that looks like yet.
It is almost like the devs are inexperienced 20 year olds..
"for the first time ever we are getting a fully open world starwars game"
Kotor, swotor, some of the lego games. This game wont be any more open world than these.
First open world star wars game and your using one blaster
@jrg3940 Yeah... I feel like that's a massive issue.
If it was a Mando game and I had all the Mando tools I could upgrade and unlock... sure... but.. a little gremlin and a pistol?
I don't know if I want to even bother with such a weak loadout... oh wait... I don't, I do not at all want to bother, and I won't.
Not because the characters a lassy, but because she's a jobber... and I just don't care enough about star wars to deal with that.
Manalorians are cool... I would fux wid it.
Unrelated... but canceling the Mando game was a really stupid thing to do on EAs part.
I understand the decisions with this game, I am not the target audience, but I get it.
I do not get canceling a mass market appeal mando/ boba game, absurd.
@@Quasiguambohey bud, how many alternative pistols does Mando n Boba have? Ur an idiot, if u gonna hate at least pick an intelligent argument
People really pretend Star Wars is anything without Jedi and sith, playing as some feeble young woman who cant even handle basic weapons well, What a joke.
@@sk8ermGs " feeble young woman", I laughed out loud at the idea of some absolute wet blanket writing this. Also, the two BEST Star Wars properties didn't have Jedi's. Andor and Rogue One. Stay mad though lmao
@@brainworm666 Paha yeah right Lol you sad flannel 🤣 nice try tho
Blasters alone won't cut it for a open world single player game, it needs a melee mechanic to it
Yeh like maybe a lightsaber..... at least make her force sensitive
@@scott_itall8638 just no...
@@scott_itall8638 exactly, just one blaster is so boring for a game like this, i will give a fair try but it would be better if she had lightsaber and use the blasters as a range weapon
@@Jr_TopGfucking lightsaber really?
@@ksamuel9 could be any melee based weapon as i initially said
Just interviews. No new gameplay is shown
@@mountrussmore intentional Ubi formula.
The leveling up mechanic is very much akin to Ghost Recon Breakpoint. Do X amount of things in a certain way [Stealth takedowns, headshots, etc.] but the having to seek out an expert makes doing the side quests actually worth exploring and doing.
"The First Open World Star Wars Game", SWTOR would like a word!
Crossing a planet in 5 minutes by speeder isn’t bad. That means it would take 25 minutes to speed across all 5 planets. Isn’t that usually about the size of a large open world map. I’m sure crossing Zelda’s or the Witcher or any assassins creed map takes less than 25 minutes
5 minutes is a long time when you’re just doing nothing but speeding in one direction
This is one of those games I'm about to wait till the actual game releases with real reviews so I'll make a decision because I've been burned too many times by Ubisoft
Prahaps I’m well informed, but I learned nothing I already knew after watching this video
should had been mando
Doesn’t matter the character, the gameplay looks slow it’s gonna be a flop
The things i'm going to hate about the lore of this game is that I can guarantee there will be no Tyber Zann featuring (which I know, that's a real wild card but it's the perfect game for him to become canon in) or MUCH more importantly, Prince Xizor whose prowess and control rivaled that of the Emperor himself and he would be an incredible inclusion in this game as he was such a powerful criminal overlord in the legends lore.
Except for you have to have people intelligent enough and with enough drive to develop a sufficient story and sadly that does not seem to exist in the current cadre of game developers. It goes against everything that is profit driven, which seems to be the mission of big game studios. Its not about the art or the fun anymore sadly. I also have a lot of fond memories of star wars legends stuff that i just had to keep in my home collection and remember how it used to be. God i sound like an old guy…..
Why does Luke let them get away with saying it’s open world? Everytime something was “promoted” wrong in Starfield he held nothing back and scolded them for it
@@noahandersen814 guarantee he's getting paid. The amount of these reviewers who say they don't take money for free opinion just lie
cause it will be open world just like most other ubi games it's just that the missions they let people play were linear
It’s not out yet…
From the beginning luke was positive about this game, despite that there are few reason to be positive. Very weird
But I know his strategy with all of that: He takes the position of the majority. If most of the people hype a game, he will be positive about it. If not, then he will be "critical"
Took a time for me to see through this
@@BenjaminAlex-c5n so when someone doesn’t have the same opinion as you they are just getting payed?
Remember guys it's not on steam, it's on their store where you can't refund, suspicious?
It’s a Ubisoft game so I’m not surprised
No. They want to promote the use of their store and launcher you goober
They always wind up on steam once the game got all the bug fix patches and content at least.
Just pirate the game lol
It’s a better business model than just being on game pass day 1 (not that they’ll be on game pass for a while anyways). Maximizes profits, gives you a chance to monitor player data, make hotfixes, etc. Then sell on 3rd party marketplaces like Steam, etc. Still, will wait for the first few patches before buying. I’m enjoying FarCry 5 at the moment for the first playthrough
I really hope this turns out the way we hope it does. I can feel the passion from the team
It's called. Acting. Their passion is your wallet
@@streakingclothed yeah $
@@bamababy152 Yeah but it's also not far fetched to believe the dev team is proud and excited for people to see what they've done. Look at Hogwarts Legacy. You're telling me those devs weren't passionate about that game?
Dev team can be verry proud ubisoft will still ruin it.
@@IRONVIK1NGpeople love just being pessimistic and following the crowd
You can get from one end of the GTAV map to the other in about 2 - 3 minutes with any decent supercar, maybe less. If anyone is bitching about it taking 5 - 6 minutes *on a speeder* and that being *short* - they should start a stopwatch and let it go for 6 minutes, it's a lot longer than you think.
Very true. My only worry is that it will be big but empty.
Bingo @@Detriax
For a whole planet that is short. I didn't time it, but it would probably take ten or more minutes to traverse all of Ghost Recon Wildland's map from one side to the other. So yeah, that's not really that big.
@@Billy-bc8pk being big isn’t the goal, I’d say. It’s having content to fill the space. Which Ghost recon, from what I recall, doesn’t.
@@Detriax 100% agreed. But it looks like this has even less gameplay mechanics than Ghost Recon, which is quite telling. Unless they whip out something ahead of its release; at least Wildlands had a nice variety of vehicles, weapons, and some poorly designed stealth mechanics. Plus, you had some of the vertical trekking, and sniper opportunities -- doesn't appear as if any of that is present in this Star Wars game.
I haven't seen anything yet that makes this an open world. It looks more linear, with some areas. Even if you can travel planet to planet, they have only show small open areas and set pieces, which I would not call open world. The one spot they showed that could make it the open world they describe in the 4-5 minutes on a speeder bike to travel from one end of a planetary area to another, comparing it to Odyssey and saying it is around 2-3 of Odyssey's zones, which isn't huge, but it is a good size for each planet area. Curiously, they have shown nothing of the open world of that area. When on a planet, do you travel point A to B and only engage with the set pieces and towns they show, or is there a lot to do out there planetside? If so, it's strange they haven't shown anything. If not, why have that big area and market this as open world? Not knocking on it. It's just a point where I don't know what to expect from this.
Also, they keep saying its the first open world Star Wars game, but we had Galaxies.
"2-3 of Odyssey's zones, which isn't huge" are you cracked out of your skull? Odyssey was huge, in fact one of the things reviews were critical on was it was TOO big and could have benefitted being concentrated a bit more. Them saying this is several times that size (if true) means the map is massive. What the hell are you on about?
@@fish5645 Take it easy there friend. Some Odyssey zones weren't too too big and some were huge, so there is quite a bit of leeway there. Also I said 2-3 zones, but the devs said "2." Still pretty big, because 5 minutes of travel on a speeder bike is a decent amount of distance. However, not huge, per se, as RDR2 by horse took around 15 minutes to cross, by way of comparison. I'm not even concerned with the size at any rate. 5 minutes to cross is fine. More important is the depth of engagement of that area, or is it mostly empty with a couple of random encounters, because like I said, they have shown literally nothing of the actual open world area.
@@fish5645 Who cares if it's massive with nothing in it? Ghost Recon Wildlands has one of the coolest and largest open world maps with hardly anything exciting to do in it other than the same handful of repetitive missions. They had all these really cool biomes that were large and expansive but nothing unique to indulge in when it came to the gameplay, hazards, enemy variety, or even vehicles. It was a copy-paste job of content throughout richly unique art assets, and it seems like that will be the same thing with this game -- large swathes of repetition spread over a relatively "massive" map.
@@ericsaari2901Are you an idiot? 5-6 minutes on a speedster is way bigger than 15 minutes on a horse haha
I love all the Odyssey talk. I really enjoyed that game.
Me too...Odyssey was my most played game ever until Elden Ring...This Star Wars game doesn't really have me all that excited though...I'm not even sure exactly why, but it's just not appealing to me in the same way...I guess I will wait until it is out in the wild before I make a decision...
Odyssey would have been good if they didn't make it such a pain in the ass to level up during the middle portion of the game without the stupid xp boost. Moving to a level based system killed AC
@@RekashalGames I forgot about that lol. I tend to like grindy games so the slow progression didn't bother me, but I remember a lot of people being very annoyed by it. Hopefully they don't add any "XP boost" to buy, but considering it is Ubisoft I wouldn't be shocked if they had some utility stuff to buy after the game releases.
@@RekashalGames Now that you mention it, I do remember people complaining about that...I never felt underpowered after the beginning areas so I just didn't worry much about leveling...I just never felt like it held me back...I can understand why that would be annoying for some people though, and it's ridiculous that they sell that crap as mtx...I have never once bought a microtransaction, so it never really occurred to me at the time that this is why they slowed the progression...
I just cannot fathom how people can enjoy such a sloppy combat system. It really highlights how few games today's generation has played.
Will it have day/night cycles on each planet
Give that man a glass of water
If u know u know
I was thinking the exact same thing. Bugged the crap out of me.
@@MinusFiveStars_ ha... pretty trippy. Maybe he just hit blunt and had cotton mouth.. probably does it all the time, and just self aware
They shouldn't use the term "open world" because the star wars world is a whole galaxy. And no one can deliver THAT open world.
Great, we get to play as Sylvester Stallone's dog.
@@DaddyDumptruckDeluxe hmm it's just a rough looking lady.
There are hordes in Days Gone right from the start. You can run into them if you are driving around. They don't show you on your map until later and you don't get the better equipment until later also. Good luck with a handgun and crossbow
What they are discrediting on how to level up isn’t anything novel. Many games do things like that. Ubisoft themselves have been doing it for over 10+ years for example assassin creed black flag. To get some equipment you have to to do main missions like the blow dart you get mid to late game
Everything about this would have been better if you could play as a Mandalorian or your own custom scroundrel or bounty hunter.
My bigger concern is how will Outlaws perform on PS5 and Series X. I really hope they don't need to compromise on the visuals and performance to much. I am actually really interested in Outlaws but hesitant because of how badly Jedi Survivor performed on console
Seems like a generic 7/10 Ubisoft game; you’ll have fun for like 5 hours then never pick it up again.
Try 4/10 at best I might even say 3 this is gonna be a flop of epic proportions
Reading the comments and realising I'm the only one excited for this
yes
Im pretty keen tbh
I mean it looks good, it does look like Uncharted meets Jedi Survivor, I just wish they didn’t paywall Jabas palace behind a pre-order.
I want to be able follow a tribe of Ewoks unseen and just observe what they do in their daily lives.. THATS an open world lol.
@@JaySimms-3lfer like Jane or Steve but on StarWars planets and their wildlife.
Would be dope af.
Diff modes, explore, stealth, research, photo mode, resource collection, riding, hunting.
Endor, Hoth, Naboo, Kashyyyk, Kamino, Tattoine, Dathomir etc etc.
Dude, YES
4,5 min in a b line is long af. And it’s 5 of those so if you lined it up that’s 25 min. On a speeder. In a straight line. BIG game
It’s probably a really good game.. I actually used to work for Ubisoft. I worked 13 years on the original far cry franchise. I don’t work there anymore. But one thing I’ve noticed a lot of other games whether it would be far cry or assassins Creed it’s always the same format pacing. The only difference is the story. No with avatar. Avatar in a different skin so I’m wondering if Star Wars is just a another.
They already said this game isn’t just another Ubisoft game with a Star Wars skin
I’m just really disappointed that I can’t create my character in a Star Wars game like this. I don’t care about the protagonist being voiced but I really don’t want to play as her.
me neither.
What's the frame rate?
Guys, remember, it's not the devs that are pushing "not owning games with subs" it's their subscription director. The devs seem like they genuinely care for the game and seem to be having fun. I think this one is worthy.
I really wouldn't have minded the empty planets in Starfield (good for outposts and modders), in fact I'd have like more of the planets we got to be totally empty, if the core planets had been dense with handmade content.
The standard price isn't that bad, yeah it's scummy that we are blocked out of a side quest and some outfits but so fuck we vote with our wallets if we stop giving them the money for little cosmetics ill still buy this as a star wars fan and ill probably enjoy it it seems interesting enough but im not going to take it seriously just appreciate the luxuries we have in life be grateful we have the freedom and spare time to enjoy , create and appreciate art.
Amazing comment, genuinely appreciate this and I hope others will as well.
I don’t have that much excitement for it, especially considering it’s Ubisoft. But some of the little things like letting you watch the ship fly through the clouds and atmosphere really just goes to show how lazy Starfield was. Yeah they both use “loading screens” for landing on a planet, but one is far more immersive and doesn’t rip you out of the world of the game and also will likely play better
The “if it doesn’t work it doesn’t work” concerns me😬😬
"Open World" is very subjective, how much of each planetry destination is available to explore ... Jedi Survivor was/looks far more open than Fallen Hero which was basically a "dungeon" with large open areas (albeit w very pretty walls much like Bloodborne) ... RDR2, Fallout4, AC Odyssey ... that's expansive open world sand box play ... that said have been wating for the game that puts me into a PS5 n think this might be it ...
This is always what I wanted. Hope they get it right. Plus not lock cool stuff behind store like wd legion did instead of in game unlocks
I just want a Star Wars game without a cute sidekick...
You might have to eat your pet
Is there any star wars media without a cute sidekick? They always have them in the movies, shows, and comics
Ultra wide is wild! Think that’s probably the wrong decision
Will you ever do a video on Massive games Division 1 and 2.
The game will be heavily discounted within 12 months.
Got Farcry 6 for 80% off 5 months after release.
Got AC Valhalla for $12, 20 months after the release.
Ubisoft games do not hold value, if you buy this game for $100+ it`s just a waste, even if you like the IP, all you have to do is wait, the game will be better later with patches and fixes anyway, so you`ll be getting a better version of the game for way cheaper.
But like, what else do you do in this game besides pew pew and vroom vroom? I haven’t seen anything yet? Like just talk to NPCS? Idk man, game looks beautiful, but that’s all I get from all the teasers.
Not gonna lie, I'd be perfectly ok with an uncharted like star wars game. Full stop. I'm excited for this.
That's exactly what fallen order and jedi survivor is... but substantially better than uncharted
Better watch out bro you're not allowed to get excited/enjoy Ubisoft games without a horde of crybabies complaining that you're having fun...
@@Tacitus_kilgore_1903 That is not true at all. Uncharted 2 takes a huge dump all over the Jedi Survivor games in terms of story, gameplay, pacing, and level design.
@@maddymcmadingson6296 You're not having fun, though, you're just tricking yourself into playing a subpar game because you refuse to play better games.
@@Billy-bc8pk How are you going to tell me what I do and do not enjoy. I had a blast playing AC Odyssey... Clowns like yourself are the people I'm talking about. Cry more.
I’m excited for this game, I’ve loved the pass games massive have made and I also love Star Wars so for me it was a no brainier of a pre order
What's your opinion of the new Disney Star Wars the Acolyte?
Star Wars is so played out as a brand the Survivor series is really the best thing going for the franchise at this point. This game doesn’t look fun or interesting or new, I hope people who are excited for this game are not let down. Just got done with AC Mirage and aside from the end it was pretty meh and the gameplay was so janky. Star Wars and Ubisoft seems like a toxic relationship.
I mean when it comes to days gone. If you find just about any cave there’s a massive horde lol. In every cave basically. You don’t have to wait. But I can guarantee if you try to fight that horde with no LMG you’re cooked.
I have literally zero interest in playing as the main character. I’m certainly going to be skipping it unless reviews say it’s too good to skip. Wish they’d let you choose your character like every other Ubisoft game.
I fear that even if they let you play as a male it would be some soy-infused male like Watch Dogs 2, or a bunch of lame characters, or they would undermine his masculinity like in AC: Valhalla by making him lame and passive. I just don't trust Western studios to make good characters these days.
@@Billy-bc8pk lol as long as he’s non-white I’m sure they’ll avoid emasculating him.
Why?
@@YourDadYodaNoone wants to play as a female. They are lame
@@YourDadYoda because I’m unable to immerse myself in a game where the player character is a different gender than me. I’d sooner play as a robot.
Why are star wars games so against character creation?! Why is that so crazy of a concept to them! like oh my god I don't want to play as a little girl, we haven't had character creation in a star wars game in knights of the old republic 2 which is insane.
I agree. I do not mind playing with a female character at all, but at least let me decide what kind of woman she will be.
It still looks like a linear game , open world is the witcher 3 or even cyberpunk not jedi survivor with bigger maps and more NPCs
Witcher 3 isn't open world. It's multiple maps split up by loading screens. Learn what open means
@@ChuloInYourCuloeveryone considered Witcher 3 as a open world
Remember kids, NEVER PRE-ORDER!
11:05 I'm going to be honest, particularly with Star Wars, I would personally prioritize the amount of planets than the size. I saw a lot of people, back with Jedi Fallen Order, who said the maps were too small. But for me, I was willing to make all the maps in the game a little bit smaller just to have another planet.
And I realize I might be in the minority of accepting that tradeoff because they did the opposite in Jedi Survivor. There were less planets to explore but the ones you could were a lot bigger.
Outlaws looks like a fine game. If the story and gameplay is anything near Jedi Fallen Order or Uncharted then it will be a good game. I don't think this game was ever going to be a 10/10 but it could definitely be a 7 or 8/10, which is a god game. People make too many mountains out of molehills these days and that's how we end up with people driving their SUVs driving through the walls at McDonalds over not getting enough ketchup. People need to calm down and stop expecting "heaven on earth" 11/10 in every aspect of life. In the words of the god Zeus... "Chill babycakes."
Also, these days we really need to start making the distinction between open world and open zones. Skyrim, Breath of the Wild, Fallout are open world whereas Jedi Survivor, The Outer Worlds (and maybe Starrfield too?) are more open zones/levels and Uncharted is/was just traditional levels/zones. At least, this is my opinion on how we should delineate.
💯
I dont get why people would want a bunch of preocedurally generated planets tbh. I love NMS, but i feel like anyone who's played that game for long enough will start to find most of the planets fairly uniteresting after a while and not really worth exploring
the mouth sounds from that one guy tho
I really hope it is the game they are promoting, because I don’t want to lie i feel that the gameplay is a bit meh. I love the main character movement in a game to be more realistic ,vibrant and a life in a sense like other games TLOU and GOW or Alan wake this makes me feel playing a game i love. For starters i love the environment and hope it to be a life like RDR2. What i mean that these games i mentioned are the best in every aspect so developers should just follow from that and build around it.
The main character's facial expressions are on the level of Mass effect Andromeda.
Her face is tired :(
She look like a ma'am
Where they done fucked up imho is not allowing players to generate/create their own character. Can't cite "immersion" at me in a Star Wars game when I'm forced to play a Dora the Explorer protagonist with her cutesy alien sidekick. That's the complete opposite of immersion in a game like this for me. If I wanna play a bad ass alien or even droid "outlaw" LET ME.
Your defended by the "Rebel locals" in Ghost Recon Wildlands. So I'm guess the system in this game is similar but with multiple factions instead of just 1.
If they add first person and character creation I'll buy it.
The last game play looked pretty good to be honest, but I won’t be getting day one, maybe the first sale it has I’ll grab it, unless they blow me away even more
Is the climbing mechanic clunky or maclunkey?
Nice
0:12 I think dead on arrival is a little harsh but I can understand being apprehensive for sure. It’s Ubisoft…
ubisoft? no thanks
I just wish it had more rpg elements, seems like despite it being open world it’s still fairly linear
Usually like Luke and all, but how low on potential content is he that he thinks the audience just wants to sit and watch him watch another video.
This is very popular content for gaming. The creator and community chat about things as they watch it. Just look at Asmongold.