Merkava v Kornet E ATGM

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 жов 2024
  • IDF Merkavas' meet stiff resistence from Kornet E equipped guerrila army during the 2006 invasion of Lebanon.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,2 тис.

  • @anibalcesarnishizk2205
    @anibalcesarnishizk2205 4 роки тому +71

    The irony is that Hezbollah has adopted David's tactics against the Goliath like Merkava.

    • @ahmedibraheem2050
      @ahmedibraheem2050 Рік тому

      Lol WTF never expected that hezbullah to be deadlear my ass is burniing huh though i am happy but I feel little nurvious due to explosion i felt like baby size of smart or cluster bomb had knocked out Israeli MBT😂🤣

    • @AnnieBadger
      @AnnieBadger 10 місяців тому +1

      Lmao

  • @elpupusero
    @elpupusero Рік тому +8

    Israel only show the power to the palestinians defenseless but when they see the other people fight back they run back to Israel 😆 🤣 😂 😹

    • @СваркаЯкутск
      @СваркаЯкутск 10 місяців тому

      Иудеи не одну рассу не считали себе равным не когда. По этому их гордость их погубит.

    • @СваркаЯкутск
      @СваркаЯкутск 10 місяців тому

      Если вы автор заметили. То не одного ныне серийного танка не осталось . Которые не уничтожались б РПГ произведенной в СССР и в России. Это показала. Война Ирак, Сирия, Украина и сейчас Израиль. Получается у стариков НАТО пустыне слова. Они предали не только своих союзников продавая им дорогое бесполезное оружие. Но и предали свой авторитет за деньги.

    • @dfnxINC
      @dfnxINC 17 днів тому

      ​@@СваркаЯкутскNo tank is invulnerable, but modern NATO MBTs are very survivable. Look at the number of Merkavas hit vs the actual losses.

  • @i_nameless_i-jgsdf
    @i_nameless_i-jgsdf 10 років тому +102

    That's right! No matter what kind of tank that you always think it is the best tank in the world such as M1 Abrams, T-90 or Leopard 2 in the end it will blow up easily by anti tank missile! Don't forget that tank is still made by human and not god!

    • @Czechmate1967
      @Czechmate1967 10 років тому +10

      Not easily. Kornet can penetrate a modern MBT but the chances of surviving in a merkava compared with being in a T-72 is quite different.

    • @McBears1
      @McBears1 10 років тому +2

      Czechmate1967 British challenger tanks are immune to those types of anti-tank missiles, many experts rate the british challenger as the best and most heavily armored tank in the world

    • @rein1329
      @rein1329 10 років тому +14

      McBears1 nope. an RPG-29 can penetrate even the frontal ERA of a Challenger 2.

    • @McBears1
      @McBears1 10 років тому

      ando loho thx, I was reading about it on wiki , the next time I go into battle if the enemy has the rpg-29 I may as well go in my underwear

    • @rein1329
      @rein1329 10 років тому +3

      sorry but from 45 Merkava tanks damaged by ATGM. only 3 of them are destroyed and cannot be returned to service. so they will not blow up easily if been hit by anti tank missile

  • @luciancotaie8803
    @luciancotaie8803 Рік тому +17

    Slava Palestine!

  • @ArtypNk
    @ArtypNk 9 років тому +128

    "Invincible tank", don't make me laugh.

    • @OmarSlloum
      @OmarSlloum 6 років тому +22

      I mean the Kornet E has 1300mm pen RHA penetration AFTER facing ERA, so it could penetrate even the m1a2 Abrams' lower glacius. thus the Merkava shouldn't be expected to withstand that 152mm tandem shaped-charge.

    • @טלקדראי-נ9צ
      @טלקדראי-נ9צ 5 років тому +2

      Its merkava 3 three you fucking moron three not 4 three

    • @gta4haterhq
      @gta4haterhq 5 років тому +9

      @@טלקדראי-נ9צ so?

    • @טלקדראי-נ9צ
      @טלקדראי-נ9צ 5 років тому +4

      @@gta4haterhq so lets think who is batter 3 or 4
      I know its hard for you but lets try

    • @fpscracker232
      @fpscracker232 5 років тому +3

      Haha, the merkava Mk4 has trophy(Aps) now, it laughs to kornets and tows, hahaha, the merkava mk4 and M1A2 abrams have trophy.

  • @asifaziz5103
    @asifaziz5103 9 років тому +76

    this is bound to happen, a slow moving conventional Army in massive columns against a Guerrilla Army which is well equipped and camouflaged and know the terrain well, can predictably inflict heavy losses on the opposing side.

    • @sidyajv
      @sidyajv 7 років тому +4

      Asif Aziz Now that's a sensible comment

    • @andrewzheng4038
      @andrewzheng4038 6 років тому +4

      Aha comment with logic and reason! My brain cells needed a break from this comment section

    • @gadibar7759
      @gadibar7759 3 роки тому

      יגבר

  • @savepalestine4929
    @savepalestine4929 7 років тому +90

    Merkava looks like roasted chicken to me

    • @idanshoval6939
      @idanshoval6939 4 роки тому +2

      Fuck off

    • @3ball260
      @3ball260 4 роки тому +12

      @@idanshoval6939 Get triggered.🤣

    • @idanshoval6939
      @idanshoval6939 4 роки тому +4

      @@3ball260 The only thing roasting on these battlefields was Hezbollah's flesh. We lost 5 tanks and about 40 were damaged. At total we lost 121 men, while we got about 600 of them. We might have failed to get all of our objectives but we gave them a deadly reminder of what the IDF is capable of.
      I'm not triggered because we both know who's the winner is - the one holding Jerusalem.
      Our army is mighty and cannot be won by a couple of sewage rats with Soviet era weapons.

    • @3ball260
      @3ball260 4 роки тому +12

      @@idanshoval6939 You guys act as if it was god that made those tanks. The most "moral" army in the world got their assas handed to them in their own version of vietnam.

    • @idanshoval6939
      @idanshoval6939 4 роки тому

      @@3ball260 tanks are slow and vulnerable for rocket fire, that's how it always been. Since '06 we've made the aps system that counters this problem, although not entirely. I would say we're pretty moral considering the circumstances.

  • @Archy11102
    @Archy11102 10 років тому +16

    it would be foolish to rely on active protection system and get the sense of "invincibility" in a tank. indeed it's a potent defense but many forget that rpgs are very cost-effective. can this system defend against 4-5 or more say 10 rpg attacks at once? of course it cant. and what about IEDs and antitank mines? those go though belly of a tank like hot knife though butter. overconfidence - it's utter demise. for example, many israeli tankers died in their venture in lebanon due to stupidity of their commanders who thought merkava was invincible.

  • @1OOPudof
    @1OOPudof 10 років тому +57

    Kornet E - really good ATGM, but new Russian multicalliber RPG 32 - it`s real monster.
    PG-32V tandem HEAT penetrate a 1000 mm armor and very usefull against active defense like "Trophy". And as can shoot thermobaric / FAE shells. Produced in Jordan under license at the JRESCO factory.

    • @revyval2128
      @revyval2128 9 років тому +6

      1OOPudof RPG-32 is not ATGM though but it's still fucking effective in city warfare.

    • @dominiccart8967
      @dominiccart8967 5 років тому +1

      Trophy can beat rpg 32

    • @-Anthracite
      @-Anthracite 4 роки тому +4

      What real monster???
      You compare a 152mm 20 pound warhead to a shoulder fired 105mm weapon
      Hahahaha get outta here

    • @Johnny-xi4ti
      @Johnny-xi4ti 4 роки тому +1

      @@-Anthracite nevertheless rpg32 is better

    • @-Anthracite
      @-Anthracite 4 роки тому +1

      @@Johnny-xi4ti nope

  • @YOCARAJO100
    @YOCARAJO100 8 років тому +65

    Peruvians chose the Kornet after evaluate their destructive power against Abrams and Merkava armor.

    • @elloboloco8795
      @elloboloco8795 8 років тому +2

      ABRAMS? WTF? THE RPG-29V WAS USED AGAINST AMERICAS M1A2 IN IRAQ, THAT IS WHY MÉXICO BUILDS THEM UNDER A RUSSIAN LICENSE, THERE WERE NOOOOOOO "KORNETS-E" IN IRAQ.

    • @senpaisanchoyt5225
      @senpaisanchoyt5225 6 років тому +1

      ElLobo Loco That's not true actually. The RPG-29V are not built in Mexico.

    • @jesusf.2600
      @jesusf.2600 6 років тому +2

      SenpaiSancho YT YES IT IS. LOOK ITBUP ON GOOGLE. THOUSANDS OF THEM HAVE BEEN BUILT UNDER RUSSIAN LISENCE.

    • @mohammadbazzi3072
      @mohammadbazzi3072 2 роки тому

      The whole World Purchase Russian Anti-tank Weapons the whole World Saw what Islamic Resistance ( Hezballah) Did to the Occupier Tanks. Even when Israehell Occupier lebanon with the help with SLA. South Lebanon Army the Traitors We the Lebanese Islamic Resistance made them Never sleep and When Israehell Withdraw ( Run away) From South Lebanon the same day The SLA Traitors Collapse they were Scared they just also Try to run away to Israehell. It was so Hamulated for both Israehell and the Traitors SLA. VERY HUMALITED even the whole Arab World and the whole Muslims World Were Proud and Praise the Lebanese Islamic Resistance ( Hezballah)

    • @elpupusero
      @elpupusero Рік тому

      @@elloboloco8795 comete un taco cara de nopal 😆 🤣 😂 😹

  • @stereosonix2000
    @stereosonix2000 9 років тому +19

    BOOOM! Merkava=smouldering wreck............Good job resistance. Keep it up.

  • @alabamamothman2986
    @alabamamothman2986 9 років тому +118

    When your army is only fighting un-armed civilians your goign to get your azz kicked

    • @DermofthedeaD
      @DermofthedeaD 9 років тому +7

      +Gabriel G Still didnt stop them murdering thousands of "Lebanese" civilians.

    • @DermofthedeaD
      @DermofthedeaD 9 років тому +6

      +Gabriel G Its is an absolute fact that Israel murdered Lebanese civilians in their thousands since 1982. Or were those thousands of butchered Lebanese civilians just made up?

    • @yuv06
      @yuv06 8 років тому +7

      +Ergie Weggedorn You mean the USA when you say terrorist right?

    • @DermofthedeaD
      @DermofthedeaD 8 років тому +11

      +Gabriel G absolutely true. Israel is responsible for the murder of thousands of Lebanese civilians. I get that you're shilling for the disgusting illegal Zionist entity, but please don't lie to me, even though it the most natural thing in the world for you to do.

    • @deathincluded3706
      @deathincluded3706 7 років тому

      when hizballah fights against civilians too in syria and loses almost 7000 soldiers.... must be rough for nasrallah these days

  • @PewPewPlasmagun
    @PewPewPlasmagun 10 років тому +55

    israelis think they are germany and produce good tanks xD although kornet could also destroy newest leopard 2.

    • @idanshoval6939
      @idanshoval6939 4 роки тому +3

      For the Israeli terrain, it is the best tank in the world

    • @irseeker9989
      @irseeker9989 4 роки тому

      Send me video where this happens.

    • @irseeker9989
      @irseeker9989 4 роки тому

      Newest leopard 2s have active defense system which intercepts the missile half flight

    • @irseeker9989
      @irseeker9989 4 роки тому

      @Tanzim Hasan those are not german leos with APS. Not germans fault they cant do a shit

    • @irseeker9989
      @irseeker9989 4 роки тому

      @Tanzim Hasan ua-cam.com/video/nwFihFCyokE/v-deo.html
      Death to islamic state

  • @stone5775
    @stone5775 Рік тому +2

    Now I’m a newer comment

  • @gershonbass6004
    @gershonbass6004 5 років тому +9

    ATGMs Metis and the first samples of the Cornet, and there were no new ones , its pretty good ATGMs , especially the Cornet, with the newest version breaking through up to 1300mm after dynamic protection, for the first version up to 1000 mm , for Metis up to 900 mm and apparently this was quite enough . merkava is basically an overpriced tank, electronics and other stuffing is good, but technically only a turret in front projection is well protected , merkava generally not an attacking tank , it is more like a mobile positional fortified point , on merkava installed many useful things and quite interesting engineering solutions have been used, but it is all unnecessary for a breakthrough tank, it stretches size - reducing protection , increases weight - reduces mobility, gives functions that distract from the main task , it's a support tank, not a breakthrough tank . mines and ambushes are what any invasion army has to face, and not to be prepared for this is extreme folly, in which it is difficult to suspect the Israeli army , constantly fighting and doing it quite competently. the losses - its a war, not kindergarten, losses are part of war, they want to be minimized, but hysteria about it - it's stupid and useless, the loss is a lesson, bloody, but necessary, the result is improved technology and tactics, in this case the active protection complex "trophy" and the active use of reconnaissance drones, before it was considered too expensive, had to pay with blood ... . Israel lost? - army fulfilled almost all assigned tasks , they didn’t have goals to occupy Lebanon, politicians lost - yes, they lost first of all in fact by betraying their own army, responses, speeches, crocodile tears for losses, and as a result of such pressure premature crumpled completion of the operation and hasty troop withdrawal , however it is not the first time when the stupidity of politicians interfere military from doing their job .

  • @dannybartlett4225
    @dannybartlett4225 Рік тому +3

    Russia now has KORNET-M and is better then Javalin. has fire and forget has top attack but can target tanks for 10km away Javalin is only 4km all these tanks that are being sent to ukraine are all dead before there even been used all the tec inside the tanks has been stripped out no target systems inside not even a radio inside lol Challenger 3 can only fire 1 round every 2 mins because the auto loader has been removed as well loool sitting ducks

    • @dfnxINC
      @dfnxINC 17 днів тому

      Source? The Challenger 3 isn't even in service and has no autoloader. There's a guy putting rounds in the breech every 5-10 seconds.

  • @gorillagirlgorilla
    @gorillagirlgorilla 14 років тому +8

    As always, Russia to the rescue!

  • @zbudda
    @zbudda 9 років тому +12

    I'm not pro-anything, but tanks would not be destroyed if they didn't invade another country. If Israel was invaded by tanks it would be the duty of every Israeli to fight back the invaders, is it not the same for the people of Lebanon. The IDF learned from this, and yes the tanks now have Trophy systems, but they now know to hunt for enemy ATGW teams first before committing armor, so they will use UAV's and UGV' drones to target and attack them first. The IDF no more going to war like going to picnic.

    • @Jmzz542
      @Jmzz542 9 років тому +3

      but still the trophy is stolen Russian tech. and they countered it already. tech is fragile. there is always a workaround.

    • @Mr.Cool628
      @Mr.Cool628 9 років тому

      Jamal Nazzal russian not had a trophy just the soviet tanks can shoted small missles to anti tank missles that actually work but no more

    • @Mr.Cool628
      @Mr.Cool628 9 років тому

      russians never developed trophy its not even worked all sovit tanks were destroyed by 1 shot from tiger or 1 shot from any 1 AT

    • @Jmzz542
      @Jmzz542 9 років тому +3

      Trophy is a Russian technology stolen by israelis.

    • @Mr.Cool628
      @Mr.Cool628 9 років тому

      no you are wrong + its not russian its soviets that mean all soviet countries + its not trophy its not even anti AT systems they never used it they not have it now so shut up

  • @toklaut7
    @toklaut7 6 років тому +19

    Thank you idf. Come again

    • @generalrommel5666
      @generalrommel5666 3 роки тому +1

      Did you take that from Apu Nahasa (Kwik-E-Mart worker) from The Simpsons?

    • @itzikashemtov6045
      @itzikashemtov6045 Рік тому +2

      Lol talking big while Lebanon still didn't recover from the 2006 war economically and now in 2022 it's economy crashed again.

  • @davidmbeckmann
    @davidmbeckmann 10 років тому +90

    Absolutely! The Israelis attempted to spare casualties and tried to let armour do all the work. The terrain is completely unsuited to armour and it is doctrine since at least the Spanish Civil War that tanks cannot fight in urban or unsuitable terrain without infantry support. This example, and the Russians in Grozny 1996 are just the latest example of ignoring this doctrine.

    • @wenjilu
      @wenjilu 10 років тому +12

      Yes. We see videos from Syria all the time of the Syrian army using only T-72 and BMPs in urban areas, often sustaining disproportionate losses.
      You'd think Israel would be the last country to make such mistakes.

    • @shayson1357
      @shayson1357 7 років тому +3

      but but....how can they advance ?
      you think the israeli soldiers would just "walk" into lebanon ?

    • @davidmbeckmann
      @davidmbeckmann 7 років тому +5

      shayson1357 No, but you can become too casualty adverse. It appears to me that the Israeli army fears casualties above all else. That becomes an Achilles Heel.

    • @shayson1357
      @shayson1357 7 років тому +1

      is it a PR or reputation thing ?

    • @davidmbeckmann
      @davidmbeckmann 7 років тому

      shayson1357 It is neither. It is a sign of decadence.

  • @Starscream2040
    @Starscream2040 8 років тому +56

    Lesson #1 Russian Antitank Guided Missiles can destroy any Main Battle Tank
    Lesson #2 Russian active and reactive defense systems are a smarter approach for tank protection.

    • @titytitmk2738
      @titytitmk2738 8 років тому +3

      +Starscream2040 > Russian Antitank Guided Missiles can destroy any Main Battle Tank
      Unless that tank is a Challenger 2. THey can get pounded by ATGMs all day, even the latest ones, and have no issue driving off or fighting back.
      Only time the C2 was ever even penned by an ATGM was when insurgents buried an RPG29 in the ground and fired it into the belly armour of a C2 tank.
      Even that tactic wouldnt work any more as the C2 has since has a 4 ton composite armoured mine plate added to its belly that brings the belly armour into line with the upper glacis and turret front.

    • @Starscream2040
      @Starscream2040 8 років тому

      Besides the RPG, do you have information about Challenger 2 Main Battle Tanks hit by modern russian anti tank weapons?. The invasion of Iraq is not really a good example to estimate how strong is a tank protection, because it fought only against old weapons.

    • @titytitmk2738
      @titytitmk2738 8 років тому +1

      Starscream2040
      The RPG29, which is a modern weapon, penned the belly of a Challenger 2 and didnt even cripple it. The only damage it did was take three toes off the drivers left foot. The vehicle was still combat capable and even drove home.
      Another Challenger 2 had its optics shot out and got stuck on its side in a ditch when the driver tried to drive blind. Its arse end, one side and its roof were completely open and vulnerable. It got hit by multiple ATGMs and dozens of RPGs of various types and not a single one penned, even when hit in the rear, side and roof.
      In fact, once help arrived, the tank was driven home after the crew could stick their heads out of the hatches to see where they were going. It only needed repairs to its optics and a few replacement composite plates to replace the few plates that had cracked under the intense, several hour long barrage.

    • @Starscream2040
      @Starscream2040 8 років тому +4

      Thats no evidence of challenger 2 MBT being hit by modern antitank guided missiles. A buried RPG29 is not being used properly. And "It got hit by multiple ATGMs and dozens of RPGs of various types" is not evidence either.

    • @titytitmk2738
      @titytitmk2738 8 років тому +1

      Starscream2040 I think I'll believe the British Army's field reports over some dude on the internet, thanks very much.
      Also, do you honestly believe the armour wasnt tested against known ATGM threats? That they would put untested armour on a tank? No, i dont think so.

  • @yochiland1315
    @yochiland1315 7 років тому +12

    Goood jobs hezbollah 😅

  • @djferg6185
    @djferg6185 9 років тому +29

    kornet's the best anti tank missile. way better than american tow.

    • @thomasbessis2809
      @thomasbessis2809 6 років тому +3

      Gar the javelin is very effective but SUPER expensive and has very limited range. It's more portable than the kornet system though

    • @sadigov
      @sadigov 6 років тому +3

      Can javelin hit from 5km?

    • @Woody-nc1ru
      @Woody-nc1ru 5 років тому +1

      Of coarse it's better than the TOW. It was out probably out before you even were born. And the missles are probably just as old.

  • @m.nsalim2226
    @m.nsalim2226 9 років тому +12

    Golden time for heavy weapons have gone.

    • @Mandrak789
      @Mandrak789 9 років тому +4

      M.N salim Yep. Heavy tank awaits the same destiny as classic battleship.

    • @agatti0089
      @agatti0089 9 років тому +1

      +Mandrak789 Heavy tank is non-existent as of now. The Merkava Mark 4 is a Main Battle Tank and currently it and the Challenger 2 are the most heavily protected MBTs in the world to both other tanks and ATGMs. MBTs will not die out for a very long time. And most modern MBTs, M1A2, Merkava, Type 99, T-14, T-90 carry a multiple of things to stop ATGMs including, ERA, cage, and APS, and currently the most effective are cage and APS. Whoops still not done. The Kornet ATGM is classified as one of the most deadly ATGMs in the world so even throwing a Merkava at it is highly unlikely but a multiple of other tanks can stop it like the T-90, M1A2, or the Challenger 2. Man I should really finish this faster. The Merkava mark 3 didn't carry Trophy APS which can stop a Kornet. The Mark 4 does. The Mark 4 can also carry Iron Fist APS which can stop sabots.

    • @elloboloco8795
      @elloboloco8795 8 років тому +1

      +Agatti 00 REALLY? CAN IT STOP THE NEW ANTI APS RPGS LIKE THE RPG-32?

  • @glennirish
    @glennirish 10 років тому +113

    Merkava & Abrams,,,Crushed by Russian Bear,,,,,

    • @airwolf5278
      @airwolf5278 9 років тому +16

      They Haven't seen the Bear yet. That was more like a Russian Cat, from Russia with love. Wait for.... from Russia with Wrath!

    • @Mr.Cool628
      @Mr.Cool628 9 років тому +5

      hah we saw how russia lost tanks in ukraine

    • @zallgrinder1525
      @zallgrinder1525 9 років тому +23

      mishokia ra
      russia has no one tank in ukraine.

    • @Mr.Cool628
      @Mr.Cool628 9 років тому +3

      they had and they got destroyed

    • @zallgrinder1525
      @zallgrinder1525 9 років тому +17

      mishokia ra if you imbecile, its your problems. but you still can ask osce, nato, and somebody else for proofs. but, please, dnont talk about pictures, where guy with beard. its, probably proof for idiots in usa, but not for real peoples.

  • @markmurphy3959
    @markmurphy3959 11 років тому +7

    Sounds like Israeli tactics were off. In rugged terrain like that you should advance with grunts in the lead and tanks in support. I imagine the the arty prep was light given the political climate. Ahh for the good old days of recon by fire.
    I wonder how much CAS there was?

    • @mefaircloth2
      @mefaircloth2 10 років тому +1

      Yea, I saw that first valley and thought "Why are they leading with tanks?"

    • @PewPewPlasmagun
      @PewPewPlasmagun 10 років тому +9

      grunts? israeli soldiers are useless scared chickens, havent you seen them cry??? only the few elitebrigades in the IDF can actually perform tasks when met by resistance... they are used to shooting palestinian children and women, I guess.

    • @PewPewPlasmagun
      @PewPewPlasmagun 10 років тому +1

      soviet union? WTF was that about now?

  • @amrozh985
    @amrozh985 3 роки тому +4

    No tanks can withstand a double anti tank missile launch in split seconds. First missile damage tank, the second in split second kill it.

  • @arashkhalili3719
    @arashkhalili3719 9 років тому +18

    Good job

  • @infoslivki587
    @infoslivki587 8 років тому +19

    Now imagine these Kornet-Rockets not in the hands of the neurotic cavemen from Hazbollah, but in the hands of well trained, coldblooded russian officers.
    The casualties should be doubled....

    • @zairmalik2775
      @zairmalik2775 8 років тому +3

      +Al Wid but you are right thats what is stunning about russian weapons no matter how sophisticated a tank is they come up with a atm system costing cpuple of grands demolishing it to a burning pile of junk....

    • @mayar9928
      @mayar9928 8 років тому +3

      Dan Morgan exactly

    • @muhd195ify
      @muhd195ify 8 років тому

      +Mayar Deeb u cant believe that russian can double the efficiency of that weapon??......u should lol

    • @mayar9928
      @mayar9928 8 років тому +3

      manofsteel12 maybe
      but i meant that since Hezbollah has a low number of infantry they should be well trained to make up for the number

    • @muhd195ify
      @muhd195ify 8 років тому +2

      Mayar Deeb oohh i thought u underestimating russia....

  • @RandyHartono
    @RandyHartono 8 років тому +4

    Awesome Kornet... Proofen

  • @MONGOLFIGHTER1
    @MONGOLFIGHTER1 9 років тому +3

    no isreali tanks destroyed.. only slight paint work damage .. repaired with can of paint from wallmart

  • @vaindioux
    @vaindioux 2 дні тому +1

    Fact of war : It is easier to take a tank out than defend it.

  • @Avatarrealm
    @Avatarrealm 6 років тому +3

    Hezbollah guerrillas fired thousands of anti-tank missiles, ranging from first generation Sagger to the highly advanced Kornet at static Israeli tanks but only succeeding in damaging some 40 tanks and only 20 were penetrated. Thats only 2% and this video praise Kornet over Merkava. Wow, talk about biasness.
    If anything, its Israelis military strategy to be blamed not the tech behind the tanks. And if you fire enough missiles at a tank, its obvious that one will eventually penetrate, how about showing a video of one to one test next time instead to prove your point.

    • @hassanhassan7493
      @hassanhassan7493 5 років тому

      Planewalker
      Because Hezbollah targets soldiers, not civilians

    • @hananabdallah8733
      @hananabdallah8733 4 місяці тому

      what you yappin about thousands of atgm missiles most likely under a 100

    • @ruslan-pe3wx
      @ruslan-pe3wx 4 місяці тому

      Not all of these missiles were fired towards tanks. Dozens of armored vehicles, IFVs, and other valuable targets were also destroyed.

  • @bombarderoazul
    @bombarderoazul 12 років тому +4

    Damn, that tank at 4:20 was completely destroyed. It suffered an internal magazine explosion, so powerful that the 25 ton turret was blown off!! hopefully the crew managed to bail out before it exploded, otherwise they were vaporized.

  • @sierramatchking7126
    @sierramatchking7126 11 років тому +6

    "IDF will suffer heavy losses but really?"
    Yes, really!

    • @idanshoval6939
      @idanshoval6939 4 роки тому +2

      Our steel giants will make sure of our victory ;)

    • @ddarkon1223
      @ddarkon1223 2 роки тому

      125 soldiers is too much for a nation like israel
      hezbollah claim 76 of their men dead altho we aren't sure

    • @mohammadbazzi3072
      @mohammadbazzi3072 2 роки тому

      @@idanshoval6939 LMAO Why don't your steel Giants didn't adevance? Your Steel Junks were Trap in Wadi al houjar. Why don't you be realistic. If youtube video shows your Steel junk Tanks never he whole World Purchase Russian Anti-tank Weapons the whole World Saw what Islamic Resistance ( Hezballah) Did to the Occupier Tanks. Even when Israehell Occupier lebanon with the help with SLA. South Lebanon Army the Traitors We the Lebanese Islamic Resistance made them Never sleep and When Israehell Withdraw ( Run away) From South Lebanon the same day The SLA Traitors Collapse they were Scared they just also Try to run away to Israehell. It was so Hamulated for both Israehell and the Traitors SLA. VERY HUMALITED even the whole Arab World and the whole Muslims World Were Proud and Praise the Lebanese Islamic Resistance ( Hezballah)

    • @Citadin
      @Citadin Рік тому

      @@idanshoval6939 Your days of dominance are over, Iran would kick your ass.

  • @deathincluded3706
    @deathincluded3706 7 років тому +4

    many were destroyed? you mean 4 tanks? thats many? well i guess hitting a ship with a missile is a hizballah victory even though at the end they lost more then 1000 soldiers... if they keep "winning" like this theyll end up destroyed hahahahahahahahaha
    oh and btw its funny how no one here mentions the 52 at missiles israeli active protection systems destroyed mid flight in 2014

  • @user-ho6ir5qj8o
    @user-ho6ir5qj8o 8 років тому +24

    God's Chariot? Very pathetic! I believe that their God has to be equipped well! Not with these kinds of hopeless chariots.

    • @sharpshooterparker
      @sharpshooterparker 7 років тому

      You on your side have shaitan that's why you always get owned by Israel))

    • @shayson1357
      @shayson1357 7 років тому

      wha?

    • @alexh2665
      @alexh2665 6 років тому +1

      You Tube gods chariot, more like mule wagon

  • @LionofZionGraphics
    @LionofZionGraphics 11 років тому +2

    A scratch is damage, You really don't bring any significance to this conversation

  • @remzobaba5713
    @remzobaba5713 6 років тому +3

    According to Israel only 49 of the over 350 tanks were destroyed 🤣🤣🤣🤣... well they lie a lot i suspect they lost half of the 350 but they will always lie

  • @ВыпимшиВыпимши
    @ВыпимшиВыпимши 11 років тому +1

    Некоторые танки получмли повреждения ходовой части. А у некоторых ракета попала в бащню, произршла детонация срапядов и оторвало бащню.
    Стреляли в основном с 3,5 км. А ты думал что подбили один танк.
    Братан 49 танков. Я понимаю английскую мову.

  • @fathiyahalmuna3432
    @fathiyahalmuna3432 3 роки тому +3

    Russian🇷🇺👍 you are
    expert in military Weapon. I love Russian from Indonesia ✌️🇮🇩1961 Indonesia war the name TRIKORA,
    Russia is a true friend of the Indonesian people until now, The 1961 Indonesian war called TRIKORA, the Netherlands, Australia and America fought with Indonesia, finally Indonesia won the war with the help of Russian combat weapons.

  • @AndrewLambert-wi8et
    @AndrewLambert-wi8et Місяць тому +1

    SWEDEN HAS SMALL ALUMINIUM BOATS.

  • @salamander5318
    @salamander5318 9 років тому +6

    Reminds me of how Russian Sams made mincemeat out of the IAF during the Yom Kippur war.

    • @EJ257IHI
      @EJ257IHI 9 років тому +2

      Sal Amander Yeah, and we then JAMMED the fuck out of your P5 radars and your SAMS were worthless, then we STOLE the radar which is even more funny. In 1982, we destroyed the entire Syrian air defense system in Lebanon and 85 of their aircraft after they tried to stop us.
      Anyone wants to try us again?

    • @salamander5318
      @salamander5318 8 років тому +1

      EJ257IHI The Russians are waiting with their S300s and S400s in Syria. The Israelis are scared because they know they have 0 chance.

    • @salamander5318
      @salamander5318 8 років тому +1

      Gabriel G LMFAO, little rag tag militias from Lebanon took out 50 Israeli tanks in the 2006 war and Russia is supposed to be scared of Israel. I don't know what you've been smoking, but it's definitely illegal and kills brain cells.

    • @itzikashemtov6045
      @itzikashemtov6045 Рік тому

      Those comments are so funny to watch today after Israel destroyed Russian Pantsirs and doing weekly bombings all around Syria/Iraq.

  • @AndrewLambert-wi8et
    @AndrewLambert-wi8et 28 днів тому +1

    SWEDEN HAS THE BEST TANKS IN THE WORLD.

  • @Farouk_Nazaruddin
    @Farouk_Nazaruddin 10 років тому +79

    Merkava and all of israeli technology just only looks good on the surface.. Russian Hardware is still the BEST!

    • @EJ257IHI
      @EJ257IHI 9 років тому +7

      Farouk Nazaruddin Oh ya, I see how good their hardware is in Syria now.............their T-72s are burning like torches.

    • @revyval2128
      @revyval2128 9 років тому +3

      EJ257IHI Syria has only ancient modifications with prehistoric DA and sights. It's always so when your budget is almost zero.

    • @cosmiclino2080
      @cosmiclino2080 9 років тому +4

      t-72s in Syria are 45 years old, they are basic models to boot, they are still effective tanks, plenty of action over the years

    • @nobbytang
      @nobbytang 6 років тому +1

      Farouk Nazaruddin ...utter crap ....the Russian stuffs good but it isn't as good as yank , Jewish or European !!

    • @widg3tswidgets416
      @widg3tswidgets416 6 років тому

      Farouk Nazaruddin Russian hardware has almost universally been found to be a giant waste of money. The main target; the West, has proven it can act with virtual impunity against all of its hardware, and not once has any piece of hardware performed up to spec--including the kornet. Although the kornet is the only exception to the rule here, it indeed didn't and doesn't perform as well as advertised. The number of kornets wasted when compared to the numbers that actually hit the target, on all battlefields prove this.
      So if you're comparing to western alternatives, you have to buy 10-12 times the amount of ATGMs and the kornet is a giant waste of money and can even have said to have been a waste of time for the Russian engineers that built it.

  • @Emanicas
    @Emanicas 11 років тому +2

    Whta show is this?

  • @agr8124
    @agr8124 10 років тому +7

    NO WAR PLEASE

    • @saburusakai
      @saburusakai 10 років тому

      Tell that to the indoctrinated Hezbollah and other islamist fanatics that cause all this crap. They can't win, no matter how many Obamas come along and take thier side and gut the western (US) military, since they will be replaced by people who realize how stupid that is. We will always fight back.

    • @Burningarrow7
      @Burningarrow7 10 років тому +3

      tell that to ISRAHELL thats occupying (palestinian, lebanese, syrian) land, bombing homes/civilians/churches/mosques, detains tens of thousands of people for years, and oppressing a whole country. and when we fight back they call us terrorists and islamist fanatics, we the christians hate you as much as the muslims and even more

    • @saburusakai
      @saburusakai 10 років тому

      Elie Rizk, please, what is with this "WE the christians hate you.........". That is a load of crap if I may say so respectfully. You are not speaking for THIS Christain or ANY of hte many ive known in my life, and I'm not very religious, but I am a Christain in belief. I don't know where you are getting your info, but please find a different source than the PLO etc. Israel isn't perfect, but they have survived because of their willingness and ability to fight. They've actually been far more tolerant than I would have been. Israel is the most reliable ally the civilized world has, and the most effective at fighting the world enemy of terrorist types.

    • @saburusakai
      @saburusakai 10 років тому

      Ellie, I did read what you say, and I understand there are reasons that alot of people have joined the ter forces, but I think they have been mostly indocctrinated. I've knwn quite a few folks from the mideast, mostly Iran, israel, and a few Egyptians (my Dad was a mitary flight instructor in the 60s, 70s). Calling the US media jewish controlled kinda backs up the indoctrination aspect for me, though Im not trivializing your passion. I do know that in 48 when Israel declared its existence, they were attacked on all sides by some pretty merciless armies. They were horribly outnumbered and outgunned, but they survived, and have been repeatedly attacked since then. Im familiar wit the military history of the area, but I understand why you feel the way you do. I just think you have been lied to by alot of people who exploit some hard facts and blame the Israelis for things they are not responsible for.

    • @saburusakai
      @saburusakai 10 років тому

      Im no fan of the US media, for the most part. I remember them losing the war in Vietnam for us. I just don't agree with Israel being the full time bad guy here. Which came first, who shot first, etc. They are just the product of thier experiences and surroundings. The Arab countries could have gotten around most of that I think. But I understand that many arabs in that area are aslo the product of hteir environment.

  • @Agm1995gamer
    @Agm1995gamer 6 років тому +2

    Oh yeah, keep thinking that m60 pattons and merkava mk 1 are designed to withstand kornets.

  • @uhohlovprigoraet5043
    @uhohlovprigoraet5043 9 років тому +6

    Слава богу я живу в России (а именно в Сибири) и как же хорошо,что мир ещё не видел наши секретные разработки. Во всех хитпарадах вооружения на youtube американцы ставят своё вооружение на первое место,но как только в России что-то разработали и оно оказалось по всем показателям лучше западных разработок,то почему-то все сразу штаны пачкают.

  • @greattribulation1388
    @greattribulation1388 3 роки тому +1

    Very strange they didn’t advance with infantry first

  • @exil3dlivecom
    @exil3dlivecom 9 років тому +3

    I like turtles

  • @dfnxINC
    @dfnxINC 17 днів тому

    The question is why didn't they have any sort of cover? Tanks alone without either artillery, infantry, CAS, etc are vulnerable.

  • @kingofburgundy6323
    @kingofburgundy6323 6 років тому +3

    Despite this propaganda you had a high chance of surviving a ATGM attack especially to the front by the armor the Merkava has

  • @uexkeru
    @uexkeru 11 років тому +1

    Even the neocons at Small Wars Journal admit 11 tanks were destroyed in just one of the battles. There are videos all over youtube showing several merkava tanks getting absolutely demolished, and one was captured intact and displayed at a Lebanese theme park.

  • @lahavhaelohim
    @lahavhaelohim 14 років тому +4

    During the war 49 tanks of different Marks were hit, 23 penetrated.
    in other words, more often then not, the missile failed to penetrate the tank.
    .
    the MK4 specifically was shown to have immense resistance to even the most powerful Kornet missiles with the armor holding out 2 out of 3 times (18 tanks hit, 5 penetrated).
    contrast that with 1973 (86% penetration rate), and you'll find that even though the missiles were more advance, the tank's armor advanced even farther.

    • @mohammadbazzi3072
      @mohammadbazzi3072 2 роки тому

      Question... Did the Tanks Advanced??? No they didn't. That is the whole Point. They were reversing back to Israel... And Ask yourself Why the SLA ( south Lebanon Army) Collapse??? Lets be Real and Honest. There is a Video of a SLA Soldeirs Fleeing to Israel Pooping in their pants... Here is a video...ua-cam.com/video/Yn_ZGxuKXOs/v-deo.html

  • @MK-jf2zd
    @MK-jf2zd 5 років тому +2

    The famous story of David vs Goliath. It’s funny Israel became modern times’ Goliath.

  • @feeblezak
    @feeblezak 11 років тому +3

    Bad tank. For counter-insurgency, crap against any conventional military.

  • @stone5775
    @stone5775 Рік тому +1

    im the newest comment

  • @Youtuberfan10
    @Youtuberfan10 10 років тому +35

    In 4:09 he said that 49 Merkava tanks were hit by Hezbolla.
    Al Jazeera only forgot to mention that only 5 Israeli tanks were destroyed, one of them by an improvised explosive device (IED).

    • @Burningarrow7
      @Burningarrow7 10 років тому +38

      5?! hahaha i lived in south lebanon in 2006 and i could see 5 tanks blown to hell from my bedroom window..we all know countries dont reveal their true weaknesses or losses specially in war so 49 according to israel which means double that at least!

    • @Youtuberfan10
      @Youtuberfan10 10 років тому +8

      Elie Rizk
      Well, then you have seen more tanks blown to hell from your bedroom window than somebody that was in 1943 in Stalingrad and that was looking out of his bedroom window.
      I am sure it must have been in your dreams.
      I think that Israel is more honest in the news than any other station in the middle east. Look what TV stations you have in Lebanon:
      Al Manar: sponsored by Hezbollah
      Al-Hiwar: sponsored by the Muslim Brotherhood.
      Al Quds al Arabi: sponsored by Hamas.
      Hell, even Arabs in the middle east watch and listen Israeli TV/Radio because it is more reliable than Arab TV/Radio.

    • @Burningarrow7
      @Burningarrow7 10 років тому +17

      ive never heard of al-hiwar and al quds..we have a lot of tv stations against hezbollah here in lebanon (al jazeera btw is the most tv station that hates hezbollah and fights them in syria) and israeli TV/radio stations are NOT allowed in arab countries, you obviously dont know what your talking about..israel had to retreat on different fronts because it couldnt advance its merkavas and in turn their infantry cz they were suffering heavy loses. even if they havent lost a single tank, they lost the war so deal with it. and if you are seriously suggesting only 5 were destroyed than you are fucking delusional and am done talking to you, good day sir

    • @Youtuberfan10
      @Youtuberfan10 10 років тому +2

      Elie Rizk
      Al Jazeera is the most objective Arab channel, but still not objective enough compared to western TV.
      I have no idea where you got the idea from that Israel has lost the 2006 war. Must be from Arab TV.
      During the war Hezbollah was hiding behind women and children.
      After the war, the Lebanese Army deployed 15,000 soldiers, backed by a UNIFIL force of 12,000, deployed South of the Litani River to replace Hezbollah. And this was the only objective of the Israeli's. That is to kick Hezbollah out of south Lebanon.
      Good day to you as well sir.

    • @Burningarrow7
      @Burningarrow7 10 років тому +15

      Sal Prive okay now am a 100% sure you have no idea what your talking about because every single thing you said was false, so get ready cz am gonna burst ur little bubble. first al jazeera is by far the most subjective/pro american arab tv channel there is, all arabs know that. second from the beginning of the war israel declared two objectives, 1) to reduce hezbollahs fighting capabilty by at least 60 to 70% and destroy all their missile firing capability and 2) invade the south of the litani river to ensure a safe zone. third israel attacked with 90,000 soldiers from infantry/tanks/ships/planes with only 5,000 hezbollah fighters and that was according to studies by the US military and the Israeli military (just type in youtube "10 vs 1 hezbollah") and israel still counldnt advance more than 5 kilometers into lebanon. the battle of bint jbeil was the fiercest battle in 2006 with 5000 IDF against 100 hezbollah fighters defending and they couldnt take the city (check that shit on wiki "battle of bint jbeil" cz lebanon is modern day sparta haha). Now they have more rockets and missiles and theyre more advanced and more fighters. and yes hezbollah won because the israeli government and generals admitted defeat and started a military committee to inquire why they had failed in achieving their goals, so who are you to say no when the government n generals admitted defeat? fourth when they saw they couldnt have any real victory on the battlefield they started bombing civilians to hit the population base of the resistance and saying hezbollah fighters were hiding there to justify it. all the civilians in the south fled in huge convoys to beirut (my entire town was left like a ghost town) and only hizbollah fighters stayed to fight. thats what the lying jewish media says to justify their bombing of civilian homes and entire buildings in beirut (which had no fighting btw). BANKS and FOOD FACTORIES in beirut were also bombed with the owners homes, did they have fighters hiding there too? and yes now there are both the lebanese army and the UNIFIL in the south, but hezbollah is still there too i see them everyday..lol theres a checkpoint to get to my town where there are all three but you have to get the permission of hezbollah to enter if theres an issue and the UN dont do shit, theyre just sitting there. please next time you wanna sound smart n seem like you know everything do your fucking research kid

  • @vovan5409
    @vovan5409 5 років тому +1

    glory to Russia

  • @oblezni
    @oblezni 6 років тому +1

    Лучшая ракета русская ракета.

  • @DavidFMayerPhD
    @DavidFMayerPhD 6 років тому +1

    Any tank without active protection is a sitting duck.

  • @kimminjoon87KMJ
    @kimminjoon87KMJ 8 років тому

    Nothing is undestroyable. Kind a odd that Arabs do have Russian weapons tho or not because of Iran and Russian relationship.

  • @dekeyboardOfficial
    @dekeyboardOfficial 13 років тому

    Israel applies a wrong tactic in this war... in other hand, Hezbollah is very smart to take advantage on Israel's mistake

  • @CharlesvanDijk-ir6bl
    @CharlesvanDijk-ir6bl 4 роки тому

    Not many people know that the Merkava can also function as an APC or an IFV. The decision to deploy an infantry platoon must be crucial. The Kornet is any tankers nightmare. They need support tanks which must be capable against ATGM's. Like the short barreled Sherman vs German AT Guns and the longer barreled 76 mm which was more suited against enemy armor in WW2.

  • @TrassseB
    @TrassseB 11 років тому

    hit means damaged it is what the IDF officially admited and those damages ranged from total destruction to light damage... non the less the ones which were not destryed needed money invested to bring them back to operational level and a doze or so were to damaged and were decomissioned from service and used for spear parts.
    so as much as you would like not to be the fact it Hit does mean damaged in this case and it was your amry who admited.

  • @drush525
    @drush525 10 років тому

    David Beckmann you need to study tank warfare history a little better before making such a statement. In 2003 the US 3rd ID was extremely successful in using armor to make a push into a major metro area called Baghdad. A city of nearly 8 million people and the tanks from 3rd ID ripped through it like shit through a goose. They lost only one, yes count them, ONE tank in the process.

  • @egorpetryaev9522
    @egorpetryaev9522 9 років тому

    say good armor saves ??
    answer the question:
    after the shot you were alive, but without arms or legs (disabled) .. What would you prefer ???
    1. You would prefer to die at once ??
    2. torments rest of your life ??
    In some cases, a quick death - is the best option .. saves a person from suffering .. Something like this.

  • @supertruckertom
    @supertruckertom 13 років тому

    Talk about driving right into a kill zone. Tanks probably couldn't even elevate the main gun high enough to shoot back at Hezbollah on the high ground. Past record is no indication of future performance if you are blinded by your previous success.

  • @kerder8660
    @kerder8660 6 років тому

    Wars r not about equipment but brains... Hehehe strategy is the best weapon of all... Hehehe I look on all the videos about 2006 Israel War with hezzbulah... Hehehe I lough... Who gave the Jewish that they smart... U see how stupid they were in their idiotic strategy... Hehehe Achilles point of all big armies being cocky & underestimate opponents... Hehehe nothing new its just old story.. Hehehe

  • @A2Kaid
    @A2Kaid 12 років тому

    The IDF did not achieve their war objectives, one of which was to destroy Hezbollah and secondly to capture the two kidnapped IDF soldiers in Hezbollah's possession.

  • @vionorino
    @vionorino 11 років тому

    Hezbollah's innovative use of anti-tank missiles was the cause of most Israeli casualties and has given the small but powerful weapons a new importance in battlefield tactics.

  • @mohammadbazzi3072
    @mohammadbazzi3072 2 роки тому

    If you Want to Know What HUMALITION look like just watch those Tanks Getting Roasted. Humalition to it best.

  • @fadlya.rahman4113
    @fadlya.rahman4113 4 роки тому

    False. Hezbollah don't have Kornet during this time. They only have AT-4 Spigot and AT-3 Sagger.

  • @joseluisnewyork
    @joseluisnewyork 12 років тому

    LOL when peruvian army was visiting Israel to evaluate the Merkava they saw what the Kornet did to that tanks, now Peru bought 500 Kornets, mother Russia rocks.

  • @LionofZionGraphics
    @LionofZionGraphics 11 років тому

    Had been hit... Clearly that shows you are just a bunch of BIAS, because hit doesn't mean damaged, and especially with the thick armor...

  • @elchikito2788
    @elchikito2788 2 роки тому

    That was perhaps the original Russia vs Ukraine. How a third world country was able to neutralize an adversaries tanks with limited resources. If not sure if they modern anti-aircraft weapons, but that would've been even more embarrassing for Israel if their aircraft were being shot down too by a non-conventional army.

  • @Capodecamper
    @Capodecamper 6 років тому

    a bunch of children arguing over who has a bigger stick...war never changes

  • @Nebrox
    @Nebrox 12 років тому

    Why did the soldiers of God get destroyed.
    They should have been able to fire lightening bolts out their asses with God on their side surely.
    xD

  • @FeliksDzerginskay
    @FeliksDzerginskay 11 років тому

    New Kornet-D shoots 10 km and more..!!! And is not included in the zone of the tanks, also confuses helicopters. Come buy, welcome! :)))

  • @xaman29
    @xaman29 3 роки тому +1

    Thank you Iran and qudis irgc. Thank u Iran your always behind resistance

  • @vionorino
    @vionorino 11 років тому

    what a humiliating loss!
    The American tax payers are spending and investing their money on some lousy, stupid and coward side hehe

  • @FeliksDzerginskay
    @FeliksDzerginskay 11 років тому

    All the Nations once, somewhere lived... Let's spend the excavations and determine where they lived peoples 20,000 years ago... ?!

  • @MetalGearArmA
    @MetalGearArmA 13 років тому

    the only 1 thing thats make the Merkava 4 is the APS without it just like in this
    video only 1 shoot from RPG-29 can destroy it all

  • @ringofthebrave
    @ringofthebrave 6 років тому +1

    Merkawas may be disabled by Missile fire (Tanks are not a thread in Lebanon) but the crew has a higher chance to survive if the tank is hit compared to Other modern tanks regardless of their origin. The Israelian Army is small and cannot afford loosing highly skilled tank crew members. The tanks can be replaced.

    • @mohammadbazzi3072
      @mohammadbazzi3072 2 роки тому

      Believe or not I really hate seeing innocent Soldiers Dies. Israehelli Soldiers Were So scared to fight but they had to. Also a Soldiers With high Moral Is better than 2 without a moral and When you invade someone Else Country the Defender will be highly Motivated and highly Moral. Trust me Although Im a pro-Russian But I knew the Ukrainian War will be hard because again the Defender have high moral than the offense. That is the Reality. And the Defender have a better chance Winning they know their Landscape and around. Israehell Learn that Lesson in a hardway. And the Islamic Resistance in Lebanon is 100x Stronger than 2006. We will Defend our country inch by inch.

  • @MrJapaneseboy1111
    @MrJapaneseboy1111 12 років тому

    hit dosent mean penetrated
    israel had only 15 dead from all its armor forces and all of those used old merkava not new ones

  • @CengizDev
    @CengizDev 9 років тому

    After the 2006 Israel-Hezbollah (or Lebanon) incident on 2008 Turkey
    made an agreement with Russia.Turkey buyed a lot of (i think 80 luncher and 800 missiles for $70 Million) Kornet
    E missiles and since 2014 Turkey manufacture they own Kornet E missiles
    at the Roketsan factory.Very impressive and combat proven anti tank
    system.

  • @MrMassaWill
    @MrMassaWill 12 років тому

    Now why would they do that?? I'm NOT opressing them.. Wow what a original comment by the way? Oh yeah, it's Hezbollah...

  • @mfshahuto6846
    @mfshahuto6846 2 місяці тому

    Well they're should worry about FPV drones more.

  • @Tod357
    @Tod357 11 років тому

    Israel didnt invaded Lebanon! Lebanon is historicly Israel territory like Kosovo is Serbia, Cyprus is Greece!

  • @vladimirvojtaml
    @vladimirvojtaml 3 роки тому

    Merkava is garbage. Worst modern MBT because it has engine in the front which fucks up the thermal imager meaning you do not see anything and modern rockets can easily penetrate the front owing to the pathetic frontal protection.

  • @kerimil
    @kerimil 13 років тому

    lol so merkavas turned into small crematorium on tracks for its crews... lol isn't that ironic?

  • @Leny1777
    @Leny1777 2 роки тому

    These kornets where modified to be more deadly. Wht did the narrator did not said that?

  • @Tod357
    @Tod357 11 років тому

    You are serving on merkava 4? You are from Israel and you are "tanker", thats two reasons for respect!

  • @drgoodvibesxxx
    @drgoodvibesxxx 6 років тому +1

    In 2006 IDF was destroyed and ran with their tails between their legs.

  • @TheBongReyes
    @TheBongReyes 11 років тому

    Not sure if you don't agree with my opinion. Or agree with it. I was stating an opinion that not modern main battle tank is indestructible. I was, also, pointing out that only total, uncompromising war can achieve total victory. Limited warfare with limited goals doesn't solve anything. Israel has the training, equipment and experience to achieve a resounding victory over Hizbollah if the IDF is allowed to conduct total warfare. Victory, to me, is by eliminating the enemy's ability to hurt you.

  • @hy150769
    @hy150769 11 років тому

    not a bit misleading , totally misleading , in Israel they care about the people on the other side , when you fighting enemy that use there own people as a shield , shooting from places that put the innocent in great risk , and hope to use the dead as a propaganda , the word win become very tricky , how you tell who won or lost , if by number of dead and by loosing land then Israel won if by the fact the terrorist was able to keep on shooting rockets on Israelis cities for 30 days ?

  • @TheBongReyes
    @TheBongReyes 11 років тому

    Inflicting casualties doesn't mean you win a war. Total war between IDF vs Hizbollah a win for the IDF. Too often in recent decades, major militaries mount "limited" warfare to minimize casualties. But any advance military that commits to total war would target any and all targets with longer reaching weapon systems. Not initially using an armor thrust. Artillery, aviation, naval bombardment then send in ground troops. 2006 was a limited engagement..

  • @TheBongReyes
    @TheBongReyes 11 років тому

    No tank is indestructible. Be it a M1A2, T-92, Leclerc, Challengers, Leopards, Merkavas, etc..2006 Conflict showed that a "limited" war doesn't war. Israel had forgotten that only total war can achieve victory. 2006 Conflict wasn't total war. Maybe the Israelis under-estimated Hizbollah's increasing inventories of better weapons. But the report is a bit misleading..in an all-out, no rules war, kill all..Hizbollah vs IDF... really? IDF will suffer heavy losses but really?

  • @talisel
    @talisel 11 років тому

    And about your second claim, that "Jews think that Palestine is an Israel Territory", please check history books.
    A. Jews were living in Israel for 4,000 years.
    B. Muslims? According to your belief, not mine - Islam was founded around 1400 years ago...
    BTW, don't forget. There is already a "Palestine country", where Palestine people are 80% of the entire population, and its area is 5 times bigger than the area of Israel. The country name is Jordan.