What answer to a historical mystery are you most skeptical about? Let us know in the comments! For more content like this, click here: ua-cam.com/video/3kJQ15kOHWs/v-deo.html
Listen watch mojo don't make any more anime related video you already showed you know nothing about bleach and made such a terrible List as well as the strongest anime character list. Other than that have a good day God bless you in Jesus name amen.
Hitler's death. They say he committed suicide in a hidden bunker or was executed by the Russians. But I and many others believe he escaped to South America, despite the lack of evidence.
would like to point out that you got the roman concrete wrong. While what you said was partially true it missed alot about what makes roman concrete special. See most concrete "rots" after a few hundred years. Roman concrete doesnt. It has nothing to do with cracks forming, its a chemical thing. Roman concrete doesnt. It was figured out recently that this is due to using volcanic ash in making it. This is why Portland Cement in the US is so prized as like the Romans they use volcanic ash.
I think that we as a modern people forget that ancient people were very intelligent and resourceful. We think that were so much more advanced because of our technology and everything that we have and that these ancient civilizations couldn’t have possibly been asintelligent as us. But by us solving these ancient mysteries, we see that that’s not the truth. These ancient civilizations were just as intelligent, and sometimes even more resourceful than modern civilizations are…
The ancient civilizations didn’t have our modern technology so they had to use their creativity and resources better and more. I feel like they were probably smarter than us not just as smart 😂
The way I see it is like this, in every generation or period of time in human history, it generally falls down to same thing, there are people who are very knowledgeable in whatever it is, they know exactly what they are talking about and they use that knowledge to perfect their skills and any results from them show that, and then there are those who don't know what they are talking about at all but think and/or claim that they do and their results also speak too. There's always been people who gain and then apply knowledge correctly and use it wisely* Vs People who don't gain and then apply that knowledge incorrectly _(or they do gain the right knowledge but then misapply it)_ and those people seam to get a lot more attention/focus from people now and then they conclude that people of that generation or time period were not very intelligent, when really those kind of people are only a part of it, there'll be other people of that same time period who's knowledge was correct and they did brilliant things or great results came from them using such knowledge wisely. _(*That's essentially what wisdom is, wisdom is the right application of knowledge, which is knowledge being used in wise, practical and intelligent ways as the having of knowledge is only part of it, its what you then do with it that truly matters.)_
I was accidentally part of the Paulding Light discovery! My family is from there, and we were visiting over the summer. When we were very little, we saw the ghost light once, so we went back when we were older, but this time, during the day. Some students from the University of Michigan said they were there to solve this mystery, so we helped them out. We hiked to the nearest hill, got to the top, and measured our location from the original point, which, if I'm correct, was about 3.5 miles out. When we returned, one of the students did some calculations and discovered that that hill was directly in the center from the viewpoint and a highway 7 miles out. So what happens at night is a highway 7 miles out, and the hill directly in the center at a perfect height distorts the lights, giving it that lantern effect, while fog can make it look glowing. Funnier thing was right when that student did calculations to find out that that highway was 7 miles out, my uncle looked at the guard rail which someone simply wrote "7 miles" amongst the other names and grafitti. My dad had a really nice camera with a zooming lens at the time, and we got a blurry picture of a car on said highway from the vantage point, which I still have somewhere. I think we also took a photo with the students, but it was such a long time ago for me. It was the most Scooby Doo thing I've ever been a part of.
Trump Vodka with a shot glass in a skull might boost sales for the vodka he never drinks. "Enjoy life with a shot" could use his assassination survival tale for a slogan.
I did a history paper on Oztiand it was stolen right off the bulletin board in the classroom. I was so proud of that paper; 22 years later, still no idea who took it - but I wouldn't be suprised if it was the girl who bullied me in 5th grade and a portion of 6th grade.
3:00 You might want to dig a little deeper into those crop circles. Those two guys were never able to recreate anything close to real crop circles. In real crop circles none of the stalks are broken or damaged. And after a couple days the wheat will grow straight again. That’s not what happens when you smash it with a board.
I don't think these were archeologists. I think these were police men and the couple who found Ötzi. They first thought he was a lost hiker. If i remember correctly later the pathologist noticed the body is far to old to be that hiker. There is also a lot of negative criticism around Ötzis recovery. They handled him so roughly, that his hipbone broke.
Right?? How exactly does a reef explain vanishing planes, pilots inexplicably losing time and ships turning up without any crew on board? And those are just a few examples. I’m not saying that the mysteries are paranormal, but they certainly can’t all be explained by a reef!
Welcome to Watchmojo and today we will be doing what we always do: making a top 20 or 30 video by adding 10 new entries to a list we've already done and calling it a new video. Stay tuned for The Top 40 Historical Mysteries That Have Been Solved, where we add another 10 to this list.
No, that crop circle explanation doesn't fly. There's no way two guys with boards and rope could have done that. I'm not saying it was aliens but I'm definitely saying it wasn't those two guys.
It’s been well known for years these guys did the crop circles. It’s really not all that difficult to do. There’s actual footage of them demonstrating how they did it. Your personal incredulity notwithstanding
@@paulannable3734 Nope, not true. There are many recognised discrepancies with their claims of how the circles were formed. They also don’t explain the numerous, highly intricate crop circles found all over the world. There’s even video footage of a crop circle forming in real time near Stonehenge, again in Wiltshire. It appears very swiftly and coincides with two or three small spherical UAPs flying low over the field. Google it if you don’t believe me.
No those guys were found out to be phony. They were paid to claim they made them. Even when they attempted to recreate some of the past designs they failed miserably not to mention they claimed they pole vaulted into the areas with equipment.
King Richard III got his royal burial. But the Princes in the Tower aka the King he forced to give the crown and his little brother hasn't. Yeah, the Hunchback King really is a villain til the end.
Except, no. There's evidence that the princes were alive and well when Richard died - evidence of household expenses and orders placed on their behalf, which would be extremely difficult to forge as it is scattered in single lines throughout the household documents. And, further, there was no benefit to Richard in having them killed. They had already been declared "illegitimate" by an act of open Parliament, in a Writ of Attainder. The Writ was repealed by Richard's successor, Henry Tudor, who claimed the throne "by right of might and marriage" - the marriage being to the boys' sister, Ann, who was also illegitimate (their dad was a bigamist - proved in the hearing that resulted in the Writ). There would have been zero benefit in marrying a bastard, so he had the Writ repealed WITHOUT READING, which was never done except this one time, but the years that had passed since its passage had blurred memories as to why it had been passed in the first place, so not reading it ensured no one would be reminded - or emboldened to speak of it. Repealing it, however, made the boys King and Heir respectively, so AT THAT TIME it was worthwhile to Henry to have them quietly killed off. Which is when the household stopped recording purchases on their behalf. Henry then spent the rest of his reign killing off every Plantaganet he could identify, in England, Scotland, and France, down to babes in arms - because every single one of them had a stronger claim to the throne than he did if he didn't maintain his "might". The few that he missed were taken care of his son, Henry VIII. You recall how kind and measured Henry VIII was about everything, right? Like father like son, I guess. But the fact that the Plantaganets were all killed off is WHY there was no one significant to marry Elizabeth off to; there wasn't anyone from any English royal lineage left, including Tudors. Which, subsequently, is why Elizabeth's successor was the King of Scotland, by invitation from Parliament, despite the fact she'd been at war with Scotland her entire reign. There wasn't anybody else. Henry Tudor killed them all, with just a bit of help from his son. Meanwhile, Richard III would gain absolutely zero benefit from killing his nephews, and in fact, as he had no children of his own, he had named the elder nephew his designated heir despite his illegitimate status. So, no. Richard was never the villain, and the City of York wrote a lamentation for his death in their official city records WHICH NOT EVEN THE TUDORS dared to have stricken from the books, as it would have triggered an uprising in the name of their "beloved son of York". The "villain" image was created by Thomas Moore, who was a wholly owned sycophant of Henry's, and popularized by Shakespeare, who not only wrote FICTION, but wrote it for QUEEN ELIZABETH. Henry's granddaughter. Do you think he'd get far lauding the king her grandfather stole the throne from? Really? This is just one of those myths that refuses to be debunked. Actual historians (unlike Moore) have gone through the records and the archeology, and published proofs of what really happened in every century since Richard's death... and still the lies go on. And just as a side note, "The Tower of London" is not and never was a prison. It was the Plantaganet's official London residence, well walled and guarded against brigands and assassins. Their home "castle" was in York, but Parliament met in London so when they were there, they lived in the Tower. You should go see it, if you're ever in London. Really a very pleasant place for a castle; most castles are far less comfortable.
Sir Thomas, a knight took him out as Richard told Thomas he would kill his sons if he did not join him in the battle where he died. Both princes were already dead.
@@dthomas9230 No, they were not. Sorry you believe the fiction. And that "sir thomas" was in fact Sir James Tyrell, who confessed to the murder (or so claimed Thomas More). It's possible that he did commit the murders, although not at the time specified by the fiction. In 1486 he received TWO pardons, spaced only weeks apart, from Henry - and that's an indication that he did some clandestine work for Henry in the interval between. What it was, however, cannot be established. The fact is, the household books show purchases made on behalf of the two princes AFTER RICHARD'S DEATH, and, as specified above, Richard would get no benefit from killing them, while Henry NEEDED to kill them to retain the throne.
Should he had been the killer Henry the 7th would have waved that around for all to know. We don't know what happened. Childhood passing was very common, it could be a number of things.
They were [allegedly) used as a tactic by the Persians when fighting Egyptians. As the latter worshipped cats/found them sacred, they would do everything in their power not to harm them. The Persians would carry them on the front line and no arrows were shot at them for fear of harming the cats. This was all according to Polyaenus. There is zero evidence to support it, and no other ancient historian mentions it. The painting is from 1872 and by Paul-Marie Lenoir.
I think logs is a much more likely source for any and all massive stones that were transported 100s or 1000s of years ago. All you have to do is get some laid down as a track and get others to act as the wheel and you just roll it along. A group of 6 to 10 men could move massive stones this way relatively easy.
I saw a lot comments about Ötzis recovery. The people who dig him out were policemen not archeologists. They tough he was a lost hiker at fist. This is why they were so rough with the body. For example Ötzis hip got damaged by one policeman and later when he was examined a undertaker broke his arm. The police also broke his bow, because it was to big to transport. There is a lot negative criticism around Ötzis fund circumstances.
The crop circles is a lie. Those guys didn’t make the crop circles. I’m sure they made a few but not all of them and certainly not ones we all think of.
They were only credited with the crop circles in that area. Not all of them nor are they credited with making the first crop circles so it was likely a lot of people messing around and making them
Yeah, the reef ‘explanation’ was just stupid given the variety of incredibly bizarre things that have occurred in that area. How on Earth does a reef account for pilots’ losing time, their instruments going haywire and even their planes being displaced?? A man in the video even mentioned ships turning up intact but with no crew on board. Some reef that! 😏
I'm not a crop circle believer but it's been pretty much proven that those 2 guys didn't create the crop circles. Doesn't mean it was or wasn't aliens but it wasn't them
The one thing I learn from so many adverts that preface videos is the moronic level and type of gameplay. These are often so offputting that it's not worth considering the quality of the video that might come after them.
Godzilla and dragons are interpretations of dinosaur and pterosaur remains, and dinosaurs, pterosaurs, plesiosaurs, and ancient crocodyliforms are endlessly diverse and interesting. As for imagined "aliens," it turns out that they were always just us humans all along.
I still don't belive that 2 guys made perfect shapes in pitch dark night time. I'm sorry but you can't make accuratlly symmetric circles with a broomstick and rope....they just didn't and I won't believe it til I die
it's easy to make symmetric circles with a rope and stick, you can do it on paper too. just hold one end of the rope at the center point, pull the rope taught. holding on to the other end of the rope walk around in a circle. you'll get a perfect circle every time.
@stevenkotyk5806 in the pitch dark In a neck high wheat field? I just CANT believe it. Especially with the countless other encounters of burn marks and land marks in russia and other parts of the states. I understand what you're saying, but nobody has demonstrated this feat at night time when they claimed to have done it. It's a he said he said. They only faintly demonstrated their giant scale prank in the daytime.
@@MrNinjakid2 There are these amazing things called "flashlights" that were even around in the 1960s and '70s! If you think about it, it would be a lot easier to hide the light of a couple of flashlights in the wee hours of the night than it would be to hide a great whacking spaceship capable of interstellar travel.
@tessat338 yes because holding a flashlight with both hands while using both hands to make symmetrical circles ranging yards is going to make the circles completely perfect lol
Atlantis was Thera/Santorini, although Plato may mad conversion errors, have used the story to satisfy other agendas outside of history, And he may have mixed it up with irrelevancies having nothing to do with Atlantis
loved this but you must remove the crop circle answer. The two old men say they started it but when they inspected the crops there were issues with magnetism, undamaged crops and perfect symmetry. where the old men could barely create a straight circle much less the intricate symmetrical patterns that were shown in the elaborate circles.
Okay, so you talked about MOVING the stones for pyramids. What about BUILDING the pyramids? Because i dont know a single animal that can lift a 1.5 ton stone. 🤷♂️
Given no complete remains have ever been found in the pyramids main chamber. Where they were supposed to be buried it's a wonder they were ever built at all Given our current theories. It's suffice to say we know next to nothing about the pyramids. Even the copper tools theory falls apart they would of needed thousands of tools as they would dull/be destroyed real quick. At least given our theory of water sand copper. We've only ever found incomplete remains, what if they were used as the place were the pharaoh under went a sort of metamorphosis and achieved being DNA spliced. Could explain only some bones/organs. They loved animals and with every day that passes we get closer and closer/know DNA splicing is a thing that can be achieved. I doubt that would of been given to just anyone. One things for certain we know nothing and they were one of the smartest civilation to exist. They understood language changes so they write in pictures. Maybe were just too dumb/arrogant to take them at their face value. Why else did they write in pictures while also building things we can't achieve today?
meh, it supposedly Was by some folks before them. they Also said headlights. problem is, the lights were said to go back to Before the road was there or even cars. conveniently, nobody really mentions That detail. i saw one show on tv that sort of hand waved over some locals trying to ask them about it. it was basically a blurb that went unaddressed. [shrugs] not that i think it's anything supernatural or funky like that. i just think there's more to it than just, "oop, dumb hicks, it's just cars. duh."
The conclusions on the Martin Bormann mystery maybe greatly over-simplified here. Mark Felton did an excellent serious about this topic (ua-cam.com/video/rjUtrTAtPFg/v-deo.htmlsi=0S5LD0vr4jMGuAPz). Evidence suggests that Bormann did escape to and later die in South America, but some of his remains were moved to Berlin in an attempt to cover this up.
That mystery is pretty easy to solve; people won’t stop talking about him nonstop everyday and people don’t trust each other anymore much less the “better” leaders.
Yea the 2 guys with the crop circles were lying by doing real things to make the others seem fake. Many of the circles have never been able to proven hoaxes.
Request : Top 10 Anime in 2025 Please Such As Fire Force S3 , Blue Excorist S5 , My Hero Academia S8 , Re:ZeroS3 Pt2 , The Appothary Daires S2 and Other 5 New Animes
@FakeCarAccount Telling someone they weren't even first doesn't mean I'm Angry. Again you seem to be angry because you harass others. No you don't know me to prove I'm a kid.
What answer to a historical mystery are you most skeptical about? Let us know in the comments!
For more content like this, click here: ua-cam.com/video/3kJQ15kOHWs/v-deo.html
Listen watch mojo don't make any more anime related video you already showed you know nothing about bleach and made such a terrible List as well as the strongest anime character list. Other than that have a good day God bless you in Jesus name amen.
Hitler's death. They say he committed suicide in a hidden bunker or was executed by the Russians. But I and many others believe he escaped to South America, despite the lack of evidence.
I’m honestly wondering which other Romanov body was missing, and why there was no conspiracy theories that that member of the family survived
would like to point out that you got the roman concrete wrong. While what you said was partially true it missed alot about what makes roman concrete special. See most concrete "rots" after a few hundred years. Roman concrete doesnt. It has nothing to do with cracks forming, its a chemical thing. Roman concrete doesnt. It was figured out recently that this is due to using volcanic ash in making it. This is why Portland Cement in the US is so prized as like the Romans they use volcanic ash.
I love this narrator’s voice. Noone’s is as good as hers. Hope she never quits.
Yes! I love Rebecca's voice too. Definitely one of the best here on UA-cam, for the English speaker that is.
She probably will cuz u said that
yeah its the perfect voice and tone for these kinds of videos
Me too!
Ai will be better soon
I think that we as a modern people forget that ancient people were very intelligent and resourceful. We think that were so much more advanced because of our technology and everything that we have and that these ancient civilizations couldn’t have possibly been asintelligent as us. But by us solving these ancient mysteries, we see that that’s not the truth. These ancient civilizations were just as intelligent, and sometimes even more resourceful than modern civilizations are…
The ancient civilizations didn’t have our modern technology so they had to use their creativity and resources better and more. I feel like they were probably smarter than us not just as smart 😂
The way I see it is like this, in every generation or period of time in human history, it generally falls down to same thing, there are people who are very knowledgeable in whatever it is, they know exactly what they are talking about and they use that knowledge to perfect their skills and any results from them show that, and then there are those who don't know what they are talking about at all but think and/or claim that they do and their results also speak too.
There's always been people who gain and then apply knowledge correctly and use it wisely* Vs People who don't gain and then apply that knowledge incorrectly _(or they do gain the right knowledge but then misapply it)_ and those people seam to get a lot more attention/focus from people now and then they conclude that people of that generation or time period were not very intelligent, when really those kind of people are only a part of it, there'll be other people of that same time period who's knowledge was correct and they did brilliant things or great results came from them using such knowledge wisely.
_(*That's essentially what wisdom is, wisdom is the right application of knowledge, which is knowledge being used in wise, practical and intelligent ways as the having of knowledge is only part of it, its what you then do with it that truly matters.)_
If they were so smart, how come their dead
@@TySpiceland Because no matter how smart you are you are still human. Sooner or later you will die.
All the narrators on WatchMojo are great, but Rebecca is the GOAT 🐐
I was accidentally part of the Paulding Light discovery! My family is from there, and we were visiting over the summer. When we were very little, we saw the ghost light once, so we went back when we were older, but this time, during the day. Some students from the University of Michigan said they were there to solve this mystery, so we helped them out. We hiked to the nearest hill, got to the top, and measured our location from the original point, which, if I'm correct, was about 3.5 miles out. When we returned, one of the students did some calculations and discovered that that hill was directly in the center from the viewpoint and a highway 7 miles out. So what happens at night is a highway 7 miles out, and the hill directly in the center at a perfect height distorts the lights, giving it that lantern effect, while fog can make it look glowing. Funnier thing was right when that student did calculations to find out that that highway was 7 miles out, my uncle looked at the guard rail which someone simply wrote "7 miles" amongst the other names and grafitti. My dad had a really nice camera with a zooming lens at the time, and we got a blurry picture of a car on said highway from the vantage point, which I still have somewhere. I think we also took a photo with the students, but it was such a long time ago for me. It was the most Scooby Doo thing I've ever been a part of.
Some crystal skulls contain vodka. 😂
Yeah. I had one and filled it with Rock Salt. Thanks Dan (SNL)!!!
They was takin it to the head
Yep, thank you Dan Aykroyd
Trump Vodka with a shot glass in a skull might boost sales for the vodka he never drinks. "Enjoy life with a shot" could use his assassination survival tale for a slogan.
I like that kind! My kinda person!
So when is Roman concrete replacing regular concrete? The roads and sidewalks here could use the updowngrade.
this would be great if those scrolls all turn out to be "Yo Mama" jokes.
Did that dude step right on Otzi’s chest?
That's what I thought. I thought archeologist were suppose ta be smart and delicate with the finding. I guess that dude didn't get the memo.
I cringed at his lack care around the delicate mummy as well....
This is the comment I came here for lol..yes like what is this dude doing lol idiot
I did a history paper on Oztiand it was stolen right off the bulletin board in the classroom.
I was so proud of that paper; 22 years later, still no idea who took it - but I wouldn't be suprised if it was the girl who bullied me in 5th grade and a portion of 6th grade.
What an ass. Hope she got bad grades!
I'm so glad you went with that thumbnail. I so love looking at Otzi's mummified face over and over whenever I check my subscriptions.
The guy in light blue/grey jacket casually stepping onto a body preserved for over 5000 years 😮
3:00 You might want to dig a little deeper into those crop circles. Those two guys were never able to recreate anything close to real crop circles. In real crop circles none of the stalks are broken or damaged. And after a couple days the wheat will grow straight again. That’s not what happens when you smash it with a board.
Yeah whyfiles covered it brilliantly.
Absolutely. True crop circles, the crops are unbroken, and much cleaner overall.
One of the best Mojo videos in a while
And that kids is how people can consider sick or deformed humans as an entirely different creature
The poor ice man died mid dab
😂😂😂
Baller
Very interesting and cool thanks WatchMojo 👏
Still didn’t explain what the Nazca lines were for.
No one knows for sure (the Nasca didn't have writing), but it's speculated they were for religious and ceremonial reasons.
Why was that archeologist basically walking directly on Otzi the ice mummy? 8:14
I don't think these were archeologists. I think these were police men and the couple who found Ötzi. They first thought he was a lost hiker. If i remember correctly later the pathologist noticed the body is far to old to be that hiker. There is also a lot of negative criticism around Ötzis recovery. They handled him so roughly, that his hipbone broke.
Bermuda triangle holds so many mysteries, saying there's a reef there doesn't exactly solve them
Right?? How exactly does a reef explain vanishing planes, pilots inexplicably losing time and ships turning up without any crew on board? And those are just a few examples. I’m not saying that the mysteries are paranormal, but they certainly can’t all be explained by a reef!
Thanks for so interesting and valuable video as always ❤❤❤
We appreciate your insights on this topic. We look forward to see more.
There was a theory that Borman had lived elsewhere for many years and buried in the location where he was found many years after WW2.
Welcome to Watchmojo and today we will be doing what we always do: making a top 20 or 30 video by adding 10 new entries to a list we've already done and calling it a new video. Stay tuned for The Top 40 Historical Mysteries That Have Been Solved, where we add another 10 to this list.
No, that crop circle explanation doesn't fly. There's no way two guys with boards and rope could have done that. I'm not saying it was aliens but I'm definitely saying it wasn't those two guys.
It’s been well known for years these guys did the crop circles. It’s really not all that difficult to do. There’s actual footage of them demonstrating how they did it. Your personal incredulity notwithstanding
@@paulannable3734 Nope, not true. There are many recognised discrepancies with their claims of how the circles were formed. They also don’t explain the numerous, highly intricate crop circles found all over the world. There’s even video footage of a crop circle forming in real time near Stonehenge, again in Wiltshire. It appears very swiftly and coincides with two or three small spherical UAPs flying low over the field. Google it if you don’t believe me.
No those guys were found out to be phony. They were paid to claim they made them. Even when they attempted to recreate some of the past designs they failed miserably not to mention they claimed they pole vaulted into the areas with equipment.
@@RCDisiacyeah i paid them
@@RCDisiac “they claimed they pole vaulted into the areas with equipment” I cannot stop laughing at this, too feckin funny 😂
The crop circles one you guys really didn’t do your homework on. Those guys are frauds. Piss poor research
Could you elaborate on how? I mean it seems like their own local news reported on them doing it so how are they frauds?
How about the Mystery of the Treasure of Oak Island.
King Richard III got his royal burial. But the Princes in the Tower aka the King he forced to give the crown and his little brother hasn't.
Yeah, the Hunchback King really is a villain til the end.
Except, no. There's evidence that the princes were alive and well when Richard died - evidence of household expenses and orders placed on their behalf, which would be extremely difficult to forge as it is scattered in single lines throughout the household documents. And, further, there was no benefit to Richard in having them killed. They had already been declared "illegitimate" by an act of open Parliament, in a Writ of Attainder.
The Writ was repealed by Richard's successor, Henry Tudor, who claimed the throne "by right of might and marriage" - the marriage being to the boys' sister, Ann, who was also illegitimate (their dad was a bigamist - proved in the hearing that resulted in the Writ). There would have been zero benefit in marrying a bastard, so he had the Writ repealed WITHOUT READING, which was never done except this one time, but the years that had passed since its passage had blurred memories as to why it had been passed in the first place, so not reading it ensured no one would be reminded - or emboldened to speak of it. Repealing it, however, made the boys King and Heir respectively, so AT THAT TIME it was worthwhile to Henry to have them quietly killed off.
Which is when the household stopped recording purchases on their behalf.
Henry then spent the rest of his reign killing off every Plantaganet he could identify, in England, Scotland, and France, down to babes in arms - because every single one of them had a stronger claim to the throne than he did if he didn't maintain his "might". The few that he missed were taken care of his son, Henry VIII. You recall how kind and measured Henry VIII was about everything, right? Like father like son, I guess. But the fact that the Plantaganets were all killed off is WHY there was no one significant to marry Elizabeth off to; there wasn't anyone from any English royal lineage left, including Tudors. Which, subsequently, is why Elizabeth's successor was the King of Scotland, by invitation from Parliament, despite the fact she'd been at war with Scotland her entire reign.
There wasn't anybody else. Henry Tudor killed them all, with just a bit of help from his son.
Meanwhile, Richard III would gain absolutely zero benefit from killing his nephews, and in fact, as he had no children of his own, he had named the elder nephew his designated heir despite his illegitimate status.
So, no. Richard was never the villain, and the City of York wrote a lamentation for his death in their official city records WHICH NOT EVEN THE TUDORS dared to have stricken from the books, as it would have triggered an uprising in the name of their "beloved son of York".
The "villain" image was created by Thomas Moore, who was a wholly owned sycophant of Henry's, and popularized by Shakespeare, who not only wrote FICTION, but wrote it for QUEEN ELIZABETH. Henry's granddaughter. Do you think he'd get far lauding the king her grandfather stole the throne from? Really?
This is just one of those myths that refuses to be debunked. Actual historians (unlike Moore) have gone through the records and the archeology, and published proofs of what really happened in every century since Richard's death... and still the lies go on.
And just as a side note, "The Tower of London" is not and never was a prison. It was the Plantaganet's official London residence, well walled and guarded against brigands and assassins. Their home "castle" was in York, but Parliament met in London so when they were there, they lived in the Tower. You should go see it, if you're ever in London. Really a very pleasant place for a castle; most castles are far less comfortable.
Sir Thomas, a knight took him out as Richard told Thomas he would kill his sons if he did not join him in the battle where he died. Both princes were already dead.
@@dthomas9230 No, they were not. Sorry you believe the fiction. And that "sir thomas" was in fact Sir James Tyrell, who confessed to the murder (or so claimed Thomas More). It's possible that he did commit the murders, although not at the time specified by the fiction. In 1486 he received TWO pardons, spaced only weeks apart, from Henry - and that's an indication that he did some clandestine work for Henry in the interval between. What it was, however, cannot be established.
The fact is, the household books show purchases made on behalf of the two princes AFTER RICHARD'S DEATH, and, as specified above, Richard would get no benefit from killing them, while Henry NEEDED to kill them to retain the throne.
Should he had been the killer Henry the 7th would have waved that around for all to know. We don't know what happened. Childhood passing was very common, it could be a number of things.
what was that dude on the horse doing holding that cat? battle kitty?
They were [allegedly) used as a tactic by the Persians when fighting Egyptians. As the latter worshipped cats/found them sacred, they would do everything in their power not to harm them. The Persians would carry them on the front line and no arrows were shot at them for fear of harming the cats. This was all according to Polyaenus. There is zero evidence to support it, and no other ancient historian mentions it.
The painting is from 1872 and by Paul-Marie Lenoir.
@@noodlechild666 Thanks for that excellent explanation! I too had noticed the cat and was curious about it.
I think logs is a much more likely source for any and all massive stones that were transported 100s or 1000s of years ago. All you have to do is get some laid down as a track and get others to act as the wheel and you just roll it along. A group of 6 to 10 men could move massive stones this way relatively easy.
Everyone knows vampires aren't in New England, but rather n New York Citay!
I wouldn’t have got the reference had it not been your spelling of ‘citay’ lol. Gotta love Laszlo 😂
I saw a lot comments about Ötzis recovery. The people who dig him out were policemen not archeologists. They tough he was a lost hiker at fist. This is why they were so rough with the body. For example Ötzis hip got damaged by one policeman and later when he was examined a undertaker broke his arm. The police also broke his bow, because it was to big to transport. There is a lot negative criticism around Ötzis fund circumstances.
The Moai walked...that's what legend said and when people tried it they could indeed get them to walk by pulling on ropes.
The crop circles is a lie. Those guys didn’t make the crop circles. I’m sure they made a few but not all of them and certainly not ones we all think of.
The other ones were probably made by other people doing the exact same thing as those guys
They were only credited with the crop circles in that area. Not all of them nor are they credited with making the first crop circles so it was likely a lot of people messing around and making them
Is mj recycling older vids or it just me🤔🤔🤔
I wonder how many more mysteries will be solved.
Watch it for over 10minutes already without knowing the video is new
They brought back Rebecca?? 👀👀👀👀
She's always been a channel fixture.
Hell yeah, I'm ready to find out who let them dogs out Who who who who who?
We’re not ready for that yet…xx😂
Kinda funny on the Bermuda triangle thing also. They never said anything about all the planes that have disappeared out there. 20 planes!!! 50 ships
Yeah, the reef ‘explanation’ was just stupid given the variety of incredibly bizarre things that have occurred in that area. How on Earth does a reef account for pilots’ losing time, their instruments going haywire and even their planes being displaced?? A man in the video even mentioned ships turning up intact but with no crew on board. Some reef that! 😏
For the love of God, don't step on the Iceman!
Naw he was straight up almost tap dancing on him XD
The Starchild discovery isn’t even mentioned on Steven Novella’s wiki page
We just so badly want there to be aliens.
They do exist. Believe me, they do exist!
I believe too.
@@jacob951245457 Just not in our solar system.
They do exist
Uh, hey dude, that's like...a dead baby..maybe stop poking at it lol..but it might be E.T!
I'm not a crop circle believer but it's been pretty much proven that those 2 guys didn't create the crop circles. Doesn't mean it was or wasn't aliens but it wasn't them
They're literally only claiming the circles in their area in the clip
Where would southern Antarctica be? At the pole? Lol
The one thing I learn from so many adverts that preface videos is the moronic level and type of gameplay. These are often so offputting that it's not worth considering the quality of the video that might come after them.
So three super famous people with Hydrocephalus:
1. Jason Voorhees
2. Me
3. Star Child
😁
So reefs are what brought down airplanes in the Bermuda Triangle. Got it.
Lol, THANK YOU. Such a stoopid ‘explanation’ of a mystery that has definitely not yet been solved.
at this point in life, i kinda wish alien and godzilla and dragon are real ...
Godzilla and dragons are interpretations of dinosaur and pterosaur remains, and dinosaurs, pterosaurs, plesiosaurs, and ancient crocodyliforms are endlessly diverse and interesting. As for imagined "aliens," it turns out that they were always just us humans all along.
how about the lost Roman legion?😊
Yes, the Roman Legion lost at the Battle of Totenberg Forest.
Can anyone tell me the source of the illustration of 17:06?
wait, ok, so they got the block to the location of the pyramid but how did they get it to the top?
The best part was Microsoft's co-founder using a Mac at minute 27
😂
The easter island heads' explanation is not enough
I still don't belive that 2 guys made perfect shapes in pitch dark night time. I'm sorry but you can't make accuratlly symmetric circles with a broomstick and rope....they just didn't and I won't believe it til I die
it's easy to make symmetric circles with a rope and stick, you can do it on paper too. just hold one end of the rope at the center point, pull the rope taught. holding on to the other end of the rope walk around in a circle. you'll get a perfect circle every time.
@stevenkotyk5806 in the pitch dark In a neck high wheat field? I just CANT believe it. Especially with the countless other encounters of burn marks and land marks in russia and other parts of the states. I understand what you're saying, but nobody has demonstrated this feat at night time when they claimed to have done it. It's a he said he said. They only faintly demonstrated their giant scale prank in the daytime.
@@MrNinjakid2 There are these amazing things called "flashlights" that were even around in the 1960s and '70s! If you think about it, it would be a lot easier to hide the light of a couple of flashlights in the wee hours of the night than it would be to hide a great whacking spaceship capable of interstellar travel.
@tessat338 yes because holding a flashlight with both hands while using both hands to make symmetrical circles ranging yards is going to make the circles completely perfect lol
@@MrNinjakid2 Ever heard of a headlamp?
Atlantis was Thera/Santorini, although Plato may mad conversion errors, have used the story to satisfy other agendas outside of history, And he may have mixed it up with irrelevancies having nothing to do with Atlantis
I'm sorry, but we do know how they got the Easter island heads there, and it was ridiculously simple? They walked them.
It will be nice when the Voynich Manuscript is shown to be a hoax. Or not. But it is interesting either way.
loved this but you must remove the crop circle answer. The two old men say they started it but when they inspected the crops there were issues with magnetism, undamaged crops and perfect symmetry. where the old men could barely create a straight circle much less the intricate symmetrical patterns that were shown in the elaborate circles.
wait, if Doug Bower only made "most" of the circles... then what about the rest?
Imitators.
28:28 only OG COD zombies fans know what really happened
@20:26 where is the dude's head?
13:44 the yoten diddler
We do know how they moved the Easter island heads. It was a system of ropes and a lot of people. There’s videos of people doing it in the modern day
Tiny bones 🦴!!
Wait til the day they solve the DB Cooper mystery lol
Bro I love the atocoma one, like damn man I could have told you that. It LOOKS like a fetus
Okay, so you talked about MOVING the stones for pyramids. What about BUILDING the pyramids? Because i dont know a single animal that can lift a 1.5 ton stone. 🤷♂️
Given no complete remains have ever been found in the pyramids main chamber. Where they were supposed to be buried it's a wonder they were ever built at all Given our current theories. It's suffice to say we know next to nothing about the pyramids. Even the copper tools theory falls apart they would of needed thousands of tools as they would dull/be destroyed real quick. At least given our theory of water sand copper. We've only ever found incomplete remains, what if they were used as the place were the pharaoh under went a sort of metamorphosis and achieved being DNA spliced. Could explain only some bones/organs. They loved animals and with every day that passes we get closer and closer/know DNA splicing is a thing that can be achieved. I doubt that would of been given to just anyone. One things for certain we know nothing and they were one of the smartest civilation to exist. They understood language changes so they write in pictures. Maybe were just too dumb/arrogant to take them at their face value. Why else did they write in pictures while also building things we can't achieve today?
Ramps allow pulling heavy loads higher.
@@dthomas9230 you're going to need a long ass fucking ramp.
*I* can lift a 1.5 ton stone. With a lever.
TOP 10 Darkwing Duck Characters
Pyramids answer is just a text book answer
I love how Michigan tech solved the paulding light 😂
Surprising visit from Matt Parker, WITH HAIR!
Where's the mystery from the Thumbnail image?? I came mainly for that!
Really? It needed a telescope and sciences to find out that it was car highlights. I would have assumed that it would be much simpler to solve.
meh, it supposedly Was by some folks before them. they Also said headlights.
problem is, the lights were said to go back to Before the road was there or even cars. conveniently, nobody really mentions That detail. i saw one show on tv that sort of hand waved over some locals trying to ask them about it. it was basically a blurb that went unaddressed. [shrugs]
not that i think it's anything supernatural or funky like that. i just think there's more to it than just, "oop, dumb hicks, it's just cars. duh."
The conclusions on the Martin Bormann mystery maybe greatly over-simplified here. Mark Felton did an excellent serious about this topic (ua-cam.com/video/rjUtrTAtPFg/v-deo.htmlsi=0S5LD0vr4jMGuAPz). Evidence suggests that Bormann did escape to and later die in South America, but some of his remains were moved to Berlin in an attempt to cover this up.
Soon the pyramid mystery will be solved
Peter!
Southern Antarctica? So on the South Pole? Looks to be on a coast which is always a northern shore.
What's with people's obsession with aliens?
17:35 hey that's Neil deGrasse Tyson's voice lmao
Everytime I see the Nazca lines, I think of Yu-Gi-Oh 5Ds lol
The Crystal skulls were actually from Germany.
Why did you assume Otzis gender? We don’t know.
Interesting
8:08 he ended himself fyi
Cool 😮😮😮😮😮😮
Most of these actually aren't proven. There just theories
Why people think Donald trump is a worthwhile human much less our quote rightful president that is a mystery
That one has stumped me for almost 8 years
You wouldn't be saying that if he never ran for president
That mystery is pretty easy to solve; people won’t stop talking about him nonstop everyday and people don’t trust each other anymore much less the “better” leaders.
I'm trying to figure out why you said quote. Lol. "President"
Well considering the options he’s best thing on the card
#4 is straight up 🧢.
We all know it was help from 👽
The answers behind Ötzi the Iceman’s icy preservation are scientific landmarks.
Yea the 2 guys with the crop circles were lying by doing real things to make the others seem fake. Many of the circles have never been able to proven hoaxes.
Slaves built the Pyramids, it's in the part where God tells the story of Moses! Amen 🙏🙌
How did you know the mummy’s gender!!??!? 😂😂😂😂
This video should be called "People are gullible superstitious idiots."
9/11
It's a strange world, after all. 🎉
@CombatingStalkers Isn't it past your bedtime, troll? 🎉
@CombatingStalkers go back to sleep
@@tylergoodman3560grow up kid 🎉
Request : Top 10 Anime in 2025 Please
Such As Fire Force S3 , Blue Excorist S5 , My Hero Academia S8 , Re:ZeroS3 Pt2 , The Appothary Daires S2 and Other 5 New Animes
Hello good nights ❤❤❤
First from 🇲🇾🇲🇾🇲🇾🇲🇾🇲🇾🇲🇾🇲🇾
Not not first
@FakeCarAccount Telling someone they weren't even first doesn't mean I'm Angry. Again you seem to be angry because you harass others. No you don't know me to prove I'm a kid.
Alot of theae explained is SO not explained well but cut off ro old researched stuff. Not quite explaining but cutting it off to next unexplained clip