LOL, this is Kentuck's Slow Grind system thatr he posted many months ago. In his earlier videos, he covers the 2nd column, which you could do here also, but Kentuck stressed to playn these 'exact' number, and Hog did exactly that, he just pl;aces bets on some corners, which creates greater losses when you hit a total loss, but nothing new here. Kentuck even mentioned his system could possibly be the best system of all time, and now another repeat? I will lay Kentucks system over this one anyday because of the way he increases his bets. KW Slow grind has never lost for me yet.
Yes, he covers the exact same numbers but increases bets faster, which can get you into trouble. I prefer slower bet increases as in my videos where you mainly increase the DS, and sometimes increase the Corners, but Hogs' system will work also, as long as you can control your betting and not get greedy as it can get high into the bet progression quickly with several losses, and increasing with every loss.
The second system is the same as my Slow Grind system, it has the exact same jackpots. I just add 4 Double streets and he adds 5 Corner bets, but everything else is exactly the same. All the winning numbers in both systems are the exactly the same also, just different amounts, since the bets are different amounts. Funny how this is a 'new' system, lol. Thanks Hog and Thanks TRM.
Yes, I mentioned the same thing, another copycat, LOL. You even mentioned under one of your videos, that you can plcae the bets higher or lower, just as long as you cover the exact same bets, which is what he did here, he basically copied you and called it his own. cheesy. too many people desperate to make a name for themselves I guess, LOL.
@@Wayne-x1h My system is safer because of my slower way of increasing bets, but I developed this system to 'never' lose, and not to make money fast. That is why I hesitantly asked if it was the best system ever on one of my videos. In my later videos, I changed the betting which is a slow grind, but with patience and knowing when to increase/decrease bets, my system will never lose for you, but again, when things are going bad, you have to have patience, and eventually you will get back into profit.
I love " my system " b4 i started watching any systems or videos or roulette strategies I came up with the Martingale without know a thing about if it was a thing or a he or she. With a pad of paper and a pen and several wins and losses. So does that make it "my system ".. i mean just sayin 😂
@@YourTopAdvisor I agree, I did the same thing before the internet, I came up with the 'Martingale' system, then years later, I realized that there was a name for it. Here, I'm not claiming to be the 'owner' or inventor of this system, I am just stating that it has already been done and I have the videos to prove it. No disrespect to HOG, I'm just letting him know that I have extensively played this, and I even already listed it as possibly the 'best system ever?' It just sounded a little too familiar, and copied word for word. No one an any channel ever profiled ANY of my systems or anything even remotely similar until I started posting my systems,(mostly the add a bet system or the remove a bet systems) then suddenly, my systems are everywhere, but always with a minor tweak or two, so that in itself is odd in my opinion. But yes, somewhere over the years, I'm sure someone, somewhere has played the systems that I use regularly. I do not claim to be the inventor but it is very odd that the systems that I use only appeared on Roulette Channels AFTER I posted them.
I just developed a bet placement modification ($20 total bet) where 4 through 33, all win money. The jackpots in the 2nd column are still fantastic, but I have it where the 1st and 3rd column numbers from 4 - 33 win $1 with the base bet. 👍 (Edit, I just developed a 2nd bet strategy of $28 inspired by Hog's placement, to win $2 on every 1st and 3rd column number between 7 and 30 while retaining jackpots on 8, 11, 14, 17, 20, 23, 26, & 29)
I agree. He stole this idea from Kentucks Slow Grind system which has a far better betting progression, and far less chance of getting high into the betting sequence. Hog also has huge losses compared to Kentucks way of playing.
He won $215 dollars using $1 betting units. This system has merit like Ketuckehite's system. Before knowing who anyone was I devised a unique system with the same premise. Seeing Hog's, I like his better than both mine or KW's. but only when you tame the betting progression. But with the revised better progression, this system (Hog's) is an ATM.
Like the system, one change, add $1 to the 0-00 split making the total starting bet $15 to play on a $15 table. Going to test it out several times for myself.
@fishinkeylargo there is nothing wrong with adding a 0/00 split bet, but there is zero difference between that bet and any other split bet you might have chosen. Zero. Somehow people started calling 0/00 an 'insurance bet' rather than what it is, which is an 'added expense bet' because it only wins once every 19 spins on average and literally costs you money every other spin when it doesn't win. Lol
There's no way I could play this one in a casino at à live table ! There's just too many chips to keep up with ! I'd be lost as last year's Easter eggs !
Majority of these systems aren't for a live table with a host.. it's for computer screens with a physical wheel, so u can use the "re-bet" button. (Real wheels without a host/hostess)
Although i do like the second system better than the first, i prefer Kentucky White's original of the system over this modification. Less losses at the higher bet levels with KW's system, and an altogether a better money management system. Maybe they should be played and compared against each other, but the only true way to do that is on a spreadsheet comparing both systems against the same number just spun. And haters....... any modification to an older system, actually does create a brand new system, that by definition, did not exist before. However, we would hope that the new one would be an improvement, yet here i prefer the original.
Every time you spin is independent of the previous spin, lol. If you are superstitious that is fine. But every single spin is not more likely to be anything. The ball doesn't know where it goes because of the ball last spin.
I got wacked out on 5 double streets leaving the same numbers exposed as the hog. Those numbers came up 8 times in 12 spins. I swear the Ameristar is using magnets as those numbers just happen to hit at an unrealistic amount when I happen to be playing 5 double streets.😡
The first system is very bad in my opinion..Why to bet 50,100,200,400 dollars to win 10 dollars ? When you lose 5 bets of 10 dollars in a row, your recovery bet will be 50 dollars..If you lose the 50 dollars recovery bet , your next bet will be minimum 100 dollars.. If you lose the 100 dollars recovery bet ,the next recovery bet will be minimum 200 dollars..If you lose again,the next recovery bet will be minimum 400 dollars,,etc etc. When you win you only win 10 dollars.. Is a modified Martingale but even worse.. In normal Martingale you bet 10,20,40,80,160,320,640.. In this example you bet 50,100,200,400,800 and game over in 5 losing spins...
Yes, I agree. The only advantage to this system, as with mine, is that you have only 8 total losses and 8 jackpots, so equal in that aspect, but the rest of the numbers are also win, or partial wins, and that is where the advantage comes in, but it is still too many bets to place.
@@kentuckwhite6701That’s good to walk away with profit and make a living from playing roulette the game we all can’t enough of with out chasing losses and tilting . Disapline is key factor can you teach that as a main strategy.
I’ve watched lots of your videos but honestly they are all titled the same. It’s impossible to go back and find a strategy you have done before and seeing as each and everyone is the NEW BEST I’m about to stop subscribing.
LOL, this is Kentuck's Slow Grind system thatr he posted many months ago. In his earlier videos, he covers the 2nd column, which you could do here also, but Kentuck stressed to playn these 'exact' number, and Hog did exactly that, he just pl;aces bets on some corners, which creates greater losses when you hit a total loss, but nothing new here. Kentuck even mentioned his system could possibly be the best system of all time, and now another repeat? I will lay Kentucks system over this one anyday because of the way he increases his bets. KW Slow grind has never lost for me yet.
Yes, he covers the exact same numbers but increases bets faster, which can get you into trouble. I prefer slower bet increases as in my videos where you mainly increase the DS, and sometimes increase the Corners, but Hogs' system will work also, as long as you can control your betting and not get greedy as it can get high into the bet progression quickly with several losses, and increasing with every loss.
The second system is the same as my Slow Grind system, it has the exact same jackpots. I just add 4 Double streets and he adds 5 Corner bets, but everything else is exactly the same. All the winning numbers in both systems are the exactly the same also, just different amounts, since the bets are different amounts. Funny how this is a 'new' system, lol. Thanks Hog and Thanks TRM.
Yes, I mentioned the same thing, another copycat, LOL. You even mentioned under one of your videos, that you can plcae the bets higher or lower, just as long as you cover the exact same bets, which is what he did here, he basically copied you and called it his own. cheesy. too many people desperate to make a name for themselves I guess, LOL.
@@Wayne-x1h My system is safer because of my slower way of increasing bets, but I developed this system to 'never' lose, and not to make money fast. That is why I hesitantly asked if it was the best system ever on one of my videos. In my later videos, I changed the betting which is a slow grind, but with patience and knowing when to increase/decrease bets, my system will never lose for you, but again, when things are going bad, you have to have patience, and eventually you will get back into profit.
I have not seen your system but if you add 4 doubble Street and he add 5 corner it is not same system
I love " my system " b4 i started watching any systems or videos or roulette strategies I came up with the Martingale without know a thing about if it was a thing or a he or she. With a pad of paper and a pen and several wins and losses. So does that make it "my system ".. i mean just sayin 😂
@@YourTopAdvisor I agree, I did the same thing before the internet, I came up with the 'Martingale' system, then years later, I realized that there was a name for it. Here, I'm not claiming to be the 'owner' or inventor of this system, I am just stating that it has already been done and I have the videos to prove it. No disrespect to HOG, I'm just letting him know that I have extensively played this, and I even already listed it as possibly the 'best system ever?' It just sounded a little too familiar, and copied word for word.
No one an any channel ever profiled ANY of my systems or anything even remotely similar until I started posting my systems,(mostly the add a bet system or the remove a bet systems) then suddenly, my systems are everywhere, but always with a minor tweak or two, so that in itself is odd in my opinion. But yes, somewhere over the years, I'm sure someone, somewhere has played the systems that I use regularly. I do not claim to be the inventor but it is very odd that the systems that I use only appeared on Roulette Channels AFTER I posted them.
I just developed a bet placement modification ($20 total bet) where 4 through 33, all win money. The jackpots in the 2nd column are still fantastic, but I have it where the 1st and 3rd column numbers from 4 - 33 win $1 with the base bet. 👍
(Edit, I just developed a 2nd bet strategy of $28 inspired by Hog's placement, to win $2 on every 1st and 3rd column number between 7 and 30 while retaining jackpots on 8, 11, 14, 17, 20, 23, 26, & 29)
ua-cam.com/video/0v_6jMotl0c/v-deo.html&si=KQauCkH7b4H7_Fzk
Hogs system is average, you only won 15 betting units. Saying that it’s the “ best “ is far from true
I agree. He stole this idea from Kentucks Slow Grind system which has a far better betting progression, and far less chance of getting high into the betting sequence. Hog also has huge losses compared to Kentucks way of playing.
He won $215 dollars using $1 betting units. This system has merit like Ketuckehite's system. Before knowing who anyone was I devised a unique system with the same premise. Seeing Hog's, I like his better than both mine or KW's. but only when you tame the betting progression.
But with the revised better progression, this system (Hog's) is an ATM.
How can you always “can’t wait “ for every system?
Because every system is fun to try. Even if it fails, which the second one did for me. It’s still a fun channel to watch🤗
Like the system, one change, add $1 to the 0-00 split making the total starting bet $15 to play on a $15 table. Going to test it out several times for myself.
@fishinkeylargo there is nothing wrong with adding a 0/00 split bet, but there is zero difference between that bet and any other split bet you might have chosen. Zero. Somehow people started calling 0/00 an 'insurance bet' rather than what it is, which is an 'added expense bet' because it only wins once every 19 spins on average and literally costs you money every other spin when it doesn't win. Lol
There's no way I could play this one in a casino at à live table ! There's just too many chips to keep up with ! I'd be
lost as last year's Easter eggs !
Majority of these systems aren't for a live table with a host.. it's for computer screens with a physical wheel, so u can use the "re-bet" button. (Real wheels without a host/hostess)
@@slikdarelic I use casino Royale. I'd have to really have to hustle to be at the clock to ladder up !
Lin the HOG system wouldn’t 5 be the same as 32?
If good system the why every upload new system ,,,just follow 1 system to win...
Thats basically a 5 double street system.
Although i do like the second system better than the first, i prefer Kentucky White's original of the system over this modification. Less losses at the higher bet levels with KW's system, and an altogether a better money management system.
Maybe they should be played and compared against each other, but the only true way to do that is on a spreadsheet comparing both systems against the same number just spun.
And haters....... any modification to an older system, actually does create a brand new system, that by definition, did not exist before. However, we would hope that the new one would be an improvement, yet here i prefer the original.
Thank you, and exactly my point.
Every time you spin is independent of the previous spin, lol. If you are superstitious that is fine. But every single spin is not more likely to be anything. The ball doesn't know where it goes because of the ball last spin.
I've been saying that in the comments section for over a year now. People don't wanna believe it.
first time i play it on demo and lost 800$!!!!!! So you see not one system is bulletproof!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ua-cam.com/video/0v_6jMotl0c/v-deo.html&si=KQauCkH7b4H7_Fzk
I got wacked out on 5 double streets leaving the same numbers exposed as the hog. Those numbers came up 8 times in 12 spins. I swear the Ameristar is using magnets as those numbers just happen to hit at an unrealistic amount when I happen to be playing 5 double streets.😡
Just play Blue Moons first and third twelves upping one unit on losses till new session profit, then reset.
100 unit bankroll plenty.
A question for roulette Master and the first system. Why bet $10 on a loss? Why not minimum lets say 10 cent or 1 dollar and pretend It's ten dollars?
The first system is very bad in my opinion..Why to bet 50,100,200,400 dollars to win 10 dollars ?
When you lose 5 bets of 10 dollars in a row, your recovery bet will be 50 dollars..If you lose the 50 dollars recovery bet , your next bet will be minimum 100 dollars.. If you lose the 100 dollars recovery bet ,the next recovery bet will be minimum 200 dollars..If you lose again,the next recovery bet will be minimum 400 dollars,,etc etc.
When you win you only win 10 dollars..
Is a modified Martingale but even worse..
In normal Martingale you bet 10,20,40,80,160,320,640..
In this example you bet 50,100,200,400,800 and game over in 5 losing spins...
Yea. These two systems just to risky. Not everything is gold. But keep them coming. I love this channel🤗
RM-Is roulette the only game you play when you are at the casino?
1st system..Samo o same o …..2ond system way too many units to deal with…..
37 numbers there’s no system or strategy but the strategy of walking away after profit target
Try that with real money.
Will lose until your mother won't recognize you. No more system to show all the same old system
You’re counting on one column to get paid u should just play the one column instead of adding all the nonsense to it.
Yes, I agree. The only advantage to this system, as with mine, is that you have only 8 total losses and 8 jackpots, so equal in that aspect, but the rest of the numbers are also win, or partial wins, and that is where the advantage comes in, but it is still too many bets to place.
It’s only a game
@@Johngidds It's a profession to me. I earn a living from Playing Roulette.
@@kentuckwhite6701That’s good to walk away with profit and make
a living from playing roulette the game we all can’t enough of with out chasing losses and tilting .
Disapline is key factor can you teach that as a main strategy.
Mr. Hogg? Roy Hogg?
There is no system that gives you + EV. They are all without any exception, a loosing system. You can't beat roulette, as simple as that.
Just like, avoiding unwanted kids, it is all about when you pull out.
I’ve watched lots of your videos but honestly they are all titled the same. It’s impossible to go back and find a strategy you have done before and seeing as each and everyone is the NEW BEST I’m about to stop subscribing.
All night long 😂. In reality, u will lose until ur mum can't recognise you if u use this system. 😊
1st..
So what...?
Wanna sticker?
@@dennisdmenace6249 yup,