YSL Judge Steps Aside - Is He Out? + THE FULL TRANSCRIPT OF THE SECRET MEETING With Big George
Вставка
- Опубліковано 4 лип 2024
- #lawyeryouknow #yslrico #yslrecords #youngthug
View the Entire YSL Playlist Here: • YSL Rico
Chapters:
00:00 Welcome
00:43 Intro
01:30 Video Clip - Judge Glanville Pauses Trial Indefinitely
02:59 Writ of Mandamus Decision
04:46 Video Clip - Court Hearing Discussing Timeline of Events
32:12 Thoughts On Hearing
32:34 Ex Parte Secret Meeting Transcript
51:24 Ex Parte Transcript - Mr. Copeland Present
1:20:27 George Final Thoughts
1:22:30 Peter Final Thoughts
1:23:10 Final Thoughts
1:27:12 Summary
1:28:25 Conclusion
🔴 Do you or someone you know need to speak to a real lawyer about a case? Or do you find yourself needing legal advice? Please reach out to our firm and we will make sure to answer your questions or find someone who can. Our consultations are always free and confidential. You can call our firm at (727)441-9030 or email us at lawyeryouknow@gmail.com.
✅ For business inquiries contact me at lawyeryouknow@gmail.com
✅ Let's connect: www.tragoslaw.com/
Twitter - @LawyerYouKnow
Instagram - /tragoslaw
Facebook - /LawyerYouKnow
TikTok - /LawyerYouKnow
✅ Join our email list here - bit.ly/33lV3Mb
✅ Get your Lawyer You Know merch here - bit.ly/LYKMerch
✅ Become a LYK Channel Member Here - bit.ly/3OecDDD
SUPERCHATS & DISCLAIMER - 1. Superchats read out are not to be taken as my opinion nor endorsed by me. 2. Questions are answered on best efforts based on my knowledge and jurisdiction.
🔴 NOT LEGAL ADVICE - Розваги
I love how the judge acted like it was his idea to release all of this information. It was also so obviously skewed.😕
When he was reading his reflection of the occurrences in the court regarding the Contempt of Court with Mr. Steele, I would either say he sugars coated it so much it makes you sick or he flat out lied about. I watched the actual hearing and he was so out of control!
@@lisajeter9511 He flat out lied! He's so scummy! Out of control still doesn't feel enough... he was unhinged!
That is exactly what I said. He didn't "decide" this "upon further review." He is doing this because the Supreme Court and appeals court are going to force his hand. He just wanted to come out before the appellate court could rule on the new Writ of Mandamus. He wants to pretend or give an appearance of his transparency and that he believes he acted properly! He knows he didn't but he is giving it his all to make justifications for why he acted the way he did!
And he deliberately misinterprets the law and case law to fit his narrative and rulings! He knows his interpretation of the case law he sited or that the attorneys have argued to him is incorrect but he twists it on the record purposefully to justify his misconduct!
@@9babyblu😊ij
I watched Glanville's reaction to being asked about this meeting and his clear outrage alone makes me highly skeptical this was above board.
Him even having to decide if he's going to release the entire transcript or not is wild.
100%! He conveniently forgot to mention that part of the Judicial Conduct rule that states when ex-parte communications do happen that it is required that "the judge makes provision promptly to notify all other parties of the substance of the ex parte communication, and gives the parties an opportunity to respond.". He straight up denied the meeting ever happened and threw Steele in JAIL for not telling him how he found out about the meeting!
The Audacity questioning who told Steele and initially giving redacted transcript
He didn’t cough not one time while reading 🤣🤨🤨🤨🤨
Exactly
What's crazy is when The Boss attorney was making argument for Mr. Steele, she cited a 1980s case. That wasn't good enough for this judge (it was too old). Now that the judge is putting in his order, he's citing 1980s cases in his defense. Now it's good enough!🤔😂
Good catch!
Excellent point!
And...you can quote cases from 1880, if it's applicable!
Thank you! I wish LYK would pay just a little closer attention to the cases he covers. It would improve the channel so much. But he does a B+ job.
Excellent catch
I feel like any hearing with only one side where a lawyer says “judge cover your ears” is UNETHICAL
Correct
@@k8mcawesome especially saying that Infront of the judge without him admonishing her, sounds like she is use to saying any unethical statement Infront of this judge, together with the hand signs they send each other they are the thugs and gang members threatening, hand signs, ganging up on witnesses, cheating, lying.....on and on I can go
Just like the judge did with the defense attorneys, many times Copeland went to point out another lie by the prosecutor, the judge jumps in and cuts him off. This judge should be held in criminal contempt himself. HE should be disbarred and jailed for corruption.
You have the Best perspective ☝️ I agree 💯
I posted a video a few weeks ago breaking down all the slick signs the prosecution gave the judge to cut of steel examination
Trying to keep things off the record.....the judge is slimey af.
If they're case is rock solid and they are seeking "justice", there's no need for all this snady nonsense. The judge and prosecution is an embarrassment to the judicial branch. I really hope that young thug learns his lesson and avoids returning to the old hood ways. Once you make it out, you can't go back without someone trying to pull you down.
Remember when the video surfaced of Judge signaling to Hylton during the testimony of Woody and the court reporters shoes being white. After reading the transcript and her coaching him how to testify about inconsistent statements and purgery explaining if I say the sky is blue and you say red, I think the Judge was signaling move on before he says something that happened in the ex parte because Woody was trying to tell us in his own way what happened in the Judges chambers if you go back and watch his testimony, it’s really eye opening.
Is it crazy how much I love that your dad always has sound issues?!
Same! He always makes me smile. 😊
I believe he said in a previous stream that he bought his dad an entire set up too. Like with a mic and everything but he refuses to use it. Personally I think it makes the sound issues all the more adorable 😂
isnt the dad also a lawyer that has been in the business for ages? What do you expect from him, to *not* bring up sound issues? Now *that* would be something worth commenting about.
The Easter egg of every episode 😂
@@jennys4271 It’s so endearing ❤️
The Judge is complicit period. He is the Gate keeper.
He's more than complicit.
The Judge got caught red handed. Stop trying to give him the benefit of the doubt.
Right? The benefit of the doubt went out of the window a long time ago.
The thing about this I find absolutely hilarious is that I believe the guy who's never told the truth more than I believe the judge and prosecutor
Same!😂
The judge said . Like Mrs love told you earlier.. page 41..
there is no transcript of love in the room when woody was in the room! There is something missing!
This has love hands all over it. The judge is lazy, she's there for sure
Steele is a superstar. He burned down this house of cards.
“A defense lawyer would be arrested if they did this stuff - A defense lawyer would be in jail”. Heck - a defense lawyer DID get thrown in jail for even asking about this convo! Spot on Papa T!
He even lied when he was putting the timeline on the record 🤦🏽♀️
Def lied! So glad they addressed this!!!
Exactly
Oh yes forgot about that
Ashleigh Merchant (who represented Steel in his contempt hearing) said it was crazy the Judge & Prosecutors didn't understand what Melnick was signalling with the "if my client testifies I am withdrawing." She said it's known as a "noisy withdrawal" and it's when you believe your client, by testifying, will potentially be committing perjury. She said Melnick was doing his legal and ethical duty by threatening to withdraw & that the Court and Counsel should have immediately understood that.
Well, the prosecution has been exposed as having nothing but mouth breathing morons in their prosecutorial staff from the very top all the way down. The best part is Willis will be re-elected with about 70 percent of the vote. The non taxpaying voters of Fulton County will see to that.
Right. I heard The Lead Attorney say the same thing on his UA-cam channel. It’s my opinion that they understood but wanted to ignore it and play dumb.
I would rather criminals get away with crimes than have garbage judges that think the law does not apply to them . I hope this judge looses everything after waisting all of the tax dollars on this trial.
I think I agree with you 100%
In the last 30 years, there have been at least 183 men released from death row awaiting their own executions due to new technology and evidence. It's estimated that 11+% of current inmates are actually innocent of the crime that put them in prison. This is why I don't believe in the death penalty. If it was 1 in 100 innocent people, I'd be against death row, but at more than 1 in 10...
Are there grounds for dimissal
@brendalewis3618 There should be, imho, but I am not a lawyer. I am sure Peter and all of lawtube will let us know.
😊yeah but what about the prosecuter they totally messed up
I haven't been following much on the YSL case but I saw dad is in on this video... I clicked so fast. Lol! Love when you bring your dad in! Y'al are both awesome!
You noticed Peter dressed up for dad 😂
That color looks good on Peter and on camera.
Love dad
Judge Glanville has been in the top seat as Chief Justice for too long. It has clouded his judgement.
Power corrupts.
I would argue his position has given him a god complex.
Nahhh
It's just Tim's FOR THIS ISH TO COME TO THE LIGHT!
How often has this judge been doing this with prosecutors before being caught and called out?
@@billkehler this goes through my mind every time I watch coverage of this trial. If it takes full time media coverage and a top-shelf defence attorney to expose this judge then I can’t imagine how many less fortunate people have fallen victim to this judge’s inability to put his pride aside.
Usually the lawyer and his Dad are very measured and diplomatic when criticising a lawyer or Judge. In this video I have never heard them be so direct and black and white in criticising this Judge and prosecution. It sounds like a no nonsense major ass-kicking.
For real-they absolutely drop the gloves when they talk about this judge. Just goes to show how bad this judge is to incur the wrath of these two gentlemen who always give the benefit of the doubt.
As they should! This unhinged idiot needs to be removed from the bench immediately!
And I’m here for it!!! ⚖️
Me 2😂😂😂
Me three! 🇺🇸
I'm finally going to obey the applicable law instead of continuing to ignore it.
"But only because I was made to," of course. Crazy. Despicable.
I've been an attorney in NC for 14 years and in my opinion the state of GA should attempt to recoup the costs of this circus from the retirement benefits of DA Fani Willis, ADA Adrian Love and Chief Resident Superior Court Judge Ural Glanville....
Sounds like a plan to me!
That's exactly what they should do, and I really hope they do that these people need to be taught a serious lesson they should all go to jail as well and see how it feels
Amen!!!!!!
Also DDA Simone Hylton
What a great idea
This Rico trial was going to be extremely difficult to prosecute. It would take a genius Judge and genius prosecution to make it work. And that is not what we got here.
So true wasted $$$
Good point. Glanville isn't intellectually prepared for this
😂😂😂
Agree. Too late and too ambitious a project.
That’s somewhat true there is so much more evidence from both sides it’s hard to tell outcome . Let’s be honest a new judge don’t mean a victory for Thug and them it could hurt them even worse. As of now they have dam good mistrial case it judge does stay on.
The gall of the prosecution tells me this is not their first time doing this.
Is it not super suspcious that the state waited for the moment that Mr. Melnick had time that he wasnt available (which they knew about for months), waited for that specific time to pull Mr. Copeland aside and start talking to him?? This seems incredibly set up. This is insane.
Right. But love tries to flip it and says he did that purposely to stall time smh. It’s insane
Bingo
Yep, that was intentional.
100%! They knew well ahead of time that Melnick could not be there! It was most certainly set up that way to have the absolute most leverage on Woody. Disgusting.
I believe they were hoping that Atty Bumpus, unsuspecting of the f**kery, would go along with the railroading without question. When they attempted to make her the attorney of record, I thought to myself that Atty Melnick was complicit. Why would he withdraw without telling her what was going on? Either way, she wasn't having it
Kayla Bumpass, a guest on another channel said the timing is off.
3-4 court deputies
2 DA investigators (cops)
2 ADAs Love/Hylton
Judge
Woody Copeland
1 stand in Atty. Ms. Bumpass for Woody.
If that isn't intimidation or coercion, what is?
And conveniently while his primary attorney was gone which is why Ms Bumpus was there to begin with
Good point!
They should all be charged with witness intimidation.
@@TerriJanehe had a planned vacation when all this went down….he was in court and explained it to the judge. Judge told him to be there or have a stand in.
Facts
If the judge’s BS doesn’t fit, you must acquit!
😂😂😂
😂😂😂 this 🗣️
What's the purpose of pleading of the 5th when the state can force immunity on you to force you to testify. While the testimony can't be used in court. The testimony can be used by investigators to open up new avenues to prosecute Copeland. Notice there were two investigators in the ex-parte meeting.
There are legitimate reasons why the courts can compel testimony, and giving witness blanket immunity means the only thing their testimony can be used against are other people so there are no 5th amendment violations. If the court cant compel testimony from witnesses then the legal system grinds to a halt as no one has to answer questions ever.
If you're going to plead the 5th, you don't accept the immunity deal. Immunity deals specify that you must testify honestly and cannot withhold any information when answering questions under oath.
@@davidlazerz8564 Yes, and a witness (or defendant) is not compelled to agree to the immunity agreement. Don't want to testify? Don't sign the agreement.
@@B_Bodziak That's not what the judge said. If the state grants it, you got it. Can't not accept it, according to Judge and prosecutor.
He didn't have to sign anything the prosecution takes a chance and grants a witness immunity thinking hopefully they were told the truth. In the prosecution is giving him is out only thing he has to say on the stand is I don't recall and just keep saying I don't recall. Bacon impeach him all they want You can't go to jail for that. Good news he is a horrible witness for the state they should have just let him pick the fifth and moved on 😂😂
The part that really worries me is that it seems like they were so casual about the whole thing. Like this is just normal, every day conversation with a witness. No concern for the rights of the defendants, the witness himself, no one. How many witnesses has this prosecution team done this to?
Agreed that means that illustrates that how badly that the system has been corrupted and flawed
This is what happens when you think you are literally and figuratively above the law. FAFO, Chief.
Slimy.
@@gooodies4u1 rent free
Yeah only the President is above the law apparently.
@@JoexSay rent free
@@88jeebstoo high of a cost to be considered "free." The U.S. SC has serious deficiencies
My FIRST live with your dad... actually my first video with your dad. All I hear are GREAT things about your dad! 😊
He’s the best!!
You are one of my favorite UA-cam lawyers to listen to. I appreciate the legal breakdown of all the cases that you take the time to do for us.
Makes sense why Mr. Copeland looked at the prosecution, then judge before he said 'I plead the fifth' 😂
That happened before they ever had the meeting.
@@88jeebs I know that. But he knew that they were dicking him around from even before the meeting. That's what I meant. That transcript is sketchy conversations in cars conversations without atty present etc.
@@jordanziegra7624 gotcha. Didn't quite understand what you meant.
@@88jeebsthat happened before the meeting on the 10th, but the email from Melnick saying he was going to plead the 5th was before then
Boy O Boy, with Fani Willis having to deal with her own allegations of corruption and this being her top prosecutor is bad enough, Granville's issues on top of that isn't fairing well for the integrity of Atlanta's judicial system.
Have you met the US Supreme Court? The ones that ride around on yachts and then rule in favor of the yacht owner. They don't even have ethics rules, they have self enforced guidelines that they ignore.
There's nothing trustworthy in our legal system right now. Prosecutors and cops lie, judges help them, and the rich get away with anything they want. Conservatives have gutted accountability in our judicial system in just about 15 years.
Bro, these are not the same thing. She had a relationship and if that’s something corrupt, you best imagine the rate of corruption throughout courts would be enormous
@@Igotnothin_She used tax payer funds & covid emergency funds to hire her boyfriend & go on expensive vacations at tax payer expense! Si much worse that just commiting adultery, which is a crime & a legal crime in that state! People/children destroyed in process, let's not make light of the consequences & resulting damages of adultery!
imo, the worrisome part is how it’s another indictment of the government - Both the judicial and executive branch. There’s already widespread mistrust of police, and prosecutors. I saw it myself, with a judge owning a law firm and employing attorneys that practice in her court. When stuff like this happens from a judge, the allegations of corruption get louder. The two are probably irrelevant to each other.. but it doesn’t look good at all.
@@cristineconnell7803 Boy, Fox sure brainwashed you
Papa T - we appreciate you!! Thank you for the time & effort you’ve invested to review various issues with this case, and for sharing your knowledge and expertise with us. I always look forward to you joining Peter on his videos - and I know many others do, as well. Thank you, again, and have a wonderful time in NC! 🙏💙🙏
Papa is so sharp at picking up what is or is not in transcripts.
Legal Layman here. 🙋♀️I bought NONE of what Glanville was selling. Shady af.
I learned that Ms. Bumpus was a stand in lawyer that day. Doing a favor for the actual lawyer. Poor Ms .Bumpus all caught up in this for standing in for her lawyer friend. Also, Tae was killed over the weekend
Details on Tae.
Who is Tae😢
May he rest in Peace 💙🤍🙏🏽
@seeingcrystal who is tae?
@@Tsanamii Tae is one of the guys in the pics that woody identified. It's hard to say if Tae and woody were friends cuz one time woody was identifying tae as a shooter and over the weekend woody referring to Tae as his friend. I don't know the details of the killing however I do know it's Tae that was killed and people thought it was woody at first but it was Tae killed over the weekend. Check out "lead attorney" this is who I was watching when I heard it. It was his Monday show. This guy has done every day of this trial.
@@aftertheheadlines Tae is one of the guys that woody identified in pics with woody. There's longer explanation here
Juror #3 for the Karen Read trial said they did puzzles when the jury was waiting for trial testimony to resume. This YSL trial jury could be building model ships while they're waiting for testimony to resume.
😂😂😂
They could be building real ships never mind model ships! I started watching this trial sitting on my mother’s knee, I’m now enjoying my retirement 😊
He also gives a snopsis of what occurred in the court room when he held Mr. Steele in contempt of court. But he gave a very watered down version of it. Because I watched the actual hearing.
Synopsis isn't enough.
THIS IS CRAZY! HE'S A SWORN IN WITNESS! I'M FLOORED
Judge is giving his defense so the other judge knows what to decide.
The other judge is the equivalent of Glanville which in itself can cause the judge to rule in Glanville favor
@@therealz360z7part of me thinks they’ll back him & allow him to stay.. the other part I think they’ll save his face from getting him out of there
COPELAND is not a defendant! He is a witness!
The judge gave bad legal advice to Woody, by stating that he can’t be charged with crimes he testifies to. But the prosecutor can change Woody if they get evidence independent of his testimony. Plus clearly the judge and the prosecutor had exparte communications, as evidenced by reference to matters that were not discussed on the record.
Agreed. If Woody states that he committed murders, and the defendants then assert that he committed the same murders, that constitutes the outside sources that Atty Hylton referenced. Someone unrelated to the proceedings could also make those assertions, and the result would be the same: an admission to committing crimes that you are now able to be prosecuted for.
The fact that this woman is prosecuting is beyond scary. What an utter cluster.
How can the judge throw him in jail for taking the 5th when they have not given him immunity from federal prosecution?
This case should be dismissed because of all the corruption. I bet the judges and ada have done this many times, this is just the first time they got caught. CHECKMATE
why should the case be dismissed? YSL just gets away with all their crimes because the judge was an idiot? Having a mistrial is one thing, *that* would be justified, but to dismiss the claims and ignore all the major crimes would be idiotic and even criminal.
@@SpydersByte I agree with you. However, the way our justice system works is that we all have a right to a fair trial and when there is judicial and/or prosecutorial misconduct there are consequences. Sometimes it is a mistrial. Sometimes it's a new judge. Sometimes it's dismissed without prejudice, and sometimes it's dismissed with prejudice which means they lose the ability to refile charges because they violated the law or the constitutional rights of defendants. Imagine this happens in a case with someone who is truly innocent. Imagine it is you being tried in this court and they truly belive you are guilty. Do you believe the process would be fair to you? Would you get a fair trial? That is the issue here. Hopefully they can retry the case but there is a chance the next judge or the upper courts will see this as a fatal error in the case and they could walk because of it.
This isnt even 1rst time they were caught it happned again in 2018 with this judge and ADA Love it was a 2018 case State vs Thorpe
@@SpydersByte What crimes ? I've followed this case daily for 2yrs there has not been 1 piece of physical evidence of a crime in this case this case is built off speculation hearsay and lyrics non of which prove anything regardless of ur thoughts or opinion
@@SpydersByte judge was an idiot = Judge was corrupt. I agree though mistrial is the appropriate remedy not dismissing the charges with prejudice. Although I'm not sure what the law says because I thought that once the trial started jeopardy attached & you couldn't just retry. But that might be only if the DA was the cause of the mistrial where in this case it's the Judge.
When she said judge close your ears 👀
The transcript is not the full transcript. That is why the judge is very comfortable.
how do you know?
@@jimbeam-ru1my page 40 line 22
Look at the so called timeline.
@@jimbeam-ru1myon another channel, attorney bumpus implied the time line is incorrect
If you read certain things it looks like the transcript was gone over with a fine toothcomb. The sentence structure doesn't make sense... have each person read this... it's a choppy convo & humans don't talk like this.
Ms Love: "It doesn't matter what was said" By a prosecutor. To a witness. Without his lawyer present. To coerce testimony. Which directly impacts the lawyer's ability to represent his client.
I truly appreciate how you guys get straight to the point and called out all BS. No sugarcoating, no tap dancing. Right is right and wrong is wrong. I thoroughly enjoyed this video and y'all's POV. Thank you!
He’s not agreeing he has NO CHOICE!
Cant believe he didn't dismiss the contempt charges against steel. Wow
As someone with hearing/processing disorder (ADHD/autism) the way they railroaded and coerced someone who was obviously confused and has his own standards of coping mechanisms and safety concerns is sickening and disturbing
Lay Crisis Counselor/First Responder 45yrs in Seattle area, I couldn't agree more!
And further, not pushing him to "testify" but to only testify how they wanted!
Don’t be too disgusted. You are not aware of how street guys work. Save yourself the dismay.
@@angeleyes3396 actually I’m dismayed with the unethical behavior of the prosecutor(s) and judges. They’re violating a person with disabilities/disadvantages rights and privileges. I actually believe him that he’s a habitual and pathological liar. Weirdly because I have ADHD/autism I can absolutely accept that he’ll use any means at his disposal and learned behaviors as coping and survival mechanisms it happens in all classes of people. It’s the power play on the people who know betters’ part against a disadvantaged individual who is clearly misunderstanding several aspects the situation and they’re acting like he/his side are the ones in the wrong.
👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽
Can’t wait to have this breakdown. This case is crazy!
But as soon as Woody states talking about how he kept telling them that he would plead the 5th, Urinal cuts him off so Woody couldn’t keep talking about what he was saying.
Doug Weinstein did an interview and said all the Fulton county judges will have to recuse themselves, this should go to another county. He likely knows those judges too, though.
Judge from another county or a retired seasoned judge should oversee this, not one of Glanville's under judge
Pleading the 5th is his right. By giving him immunity took that right away from him.
Common sence is that they intentionally took away his right to chose for himself.
They backed him into a corner. Good for him to plead the 5th anyway. He should be able to sue their butts off.
Attorney Bumpus said they told Copeland he’d be held “ indefinitely”! She also said people were in and out of chambers constantly. She laughed at the comment when the Judge said “ Attorney Bumpus was seen speaking to Brian Steele and Attorney Adam’s” She has worked for the court for years and is often seen speaking to other attorneys. His comments were ridiculous, she said the attorneys knew most of what was said before she spoke to them. Please tell me the Prosecutors can be brought up on any charges for what they did, honestly it sickens me to think they are supposed to uphold the law and instead they abuse it.
Your dad is so amazing at explaining everything to non lawyers. Love when you two tag team the big ones.
I really can't understand this judges state of mind. Did he think this was going to pass by quietly with out consequence? He knows it was all live streamed. I wonder what he does when the public isn't watching. It is scary that this is his "public persona"
He's probably done this many times before and is emboldened by the fact that he faced no repercussion. The attention this case received blew up in his face.
Attorney Bumpus said on another stream that the timeline the Judge claimed was wrong. The way the Judge gave the timeline has to be accurate with the court reporter, but personally I think it would unfortunately be tampered with. If you look closely at the court reporter’s face when Brian Steele was making his record and he said “ Copeland said he was the one who committed the murder “ the court reporter’s neck almost snapped and she looked directly at the Prosecutor table. There are so many things in this case that seem to be “ not right “. I wouldn’t put it past them to commit other false claims to cover their ( Y ) . You can see also the closeness between the Judge and the reporter . I don’t trust any of them.
And the "other stream" is "The Lead Attorney" so don't leave that out.
Few thoughts…
46:19 the judge allowed Love to recap what she overheard Melnick advise Copeland before he plead the fifth that Friday.
-Not only do the prosecutors have a disregard of Copeland’s life, so does the judge. It was evident when Glanville basically said if he suffers harms it’s collateral consequences of testifying.
-I’m willing to bet money that this was not the first ex parte communication with witnesses. Remember when the female who was arrested on the material witness warrant told the investigator to have the judge call her???
at 51:48 you actually got that wrong. Mrs love exits the chambers .. and I think they do that so that the Defense attorneys sees either Hylton or Love roaming the hallways so they dont get suspicious as to why everyone is missing ... My opinion in this matter
I think that is totally plausible with this crew!!👍🏻
Even after not allowing the defense attorney there he stepped it up and refused to provide the transcript!
This is absolutely horrible on the states part. Im very curious if there will be any repercussions for the state?? The part that the judge really did wrong imo was allowing this and then covering it up the way he did.
Also, hey there Papa Tragos. Thank you to you and Peter for covering this. ❤
17:00 Steele looks like he's so done with Judge Glanville..
THIS guy is a lead judge of his district?!?! Unbelievable
to clarify: the alternate judge is not hearing the superior court mandamus. the mandamus was rendered moot when glanville vacated his prior denial of the motions to recuse and referred the motions to recuse to an alternate judge. that was the sole requested relief of the mandamus. most likely, the judge currently assigned to hear the motions to recuse will be voluntarily recusing herself, along with the other fulton county judges, and they will instead be heard by a judge designate from another jurisdiction.
They need to get rid of the judge
I love seeing the respect between father and son. 😊
This is intimidation!!! Are we just hearing more about intimidation because of social media🤔
I think Melnick was the whistle blower lol. Bumpus called and told him about it and he told the defense attorneys.
I would have done the same thing if that is indeed how the information got disseminated. "Hey Mr. Defense Lawyer, while I was on vacation and had a stand in lawyer representing my client, a sworn witness in your case, the judge and prosecutors had a coercive exparte meeting with him and I bet they didn't tell you about it. Thoughts?" Would have been the easiest email I'd ever sent.
That's what I said as well. Pretty obvious IMO.
He’s going to bundle all 3 recusal request together to be heard by 1 Judge.
There are allegations that the police officers were wearing tactical gear and had semi automatic weapons when Mr Copeland exited the elevator, and that the transcript has been altered, that at times the court reporter was told to stop, and that there is a whistleblower.
There is that bizarre gap where everyone is pulled put then it seems to continue without any mention of the reason for disruption on the record
those allegations are nonsense.
@@jimbeam-ru1mywhy?
@@jimbeam-ru1my have you seen any interviews with Kayla Bumpus?
Or other interviews?
I've been dying to hear your guys breakdown of this transcript since I saw the judge was releasing it! I watched some other channels but they just don't break it down the way you guys do!! Love this channel! I started listening back during the Johnny Depp trial and I've listened ever since!
My head is spinning with this transcript! 😵💫
Woody got more sense than they do
I heard an interview . Attorney Bumplus( misspelled-sorry) gave yesterday. She stated the attorneys already knew about the meeting prior to when she spoke to Steele and the others.
she isn't credible. she already lied to steel about things that were said in the ex parte.
Hylton said it at the end of court the day before. It was NOT purposely make it "secret". I heard Hylton live.
I truly appreciate how you guys get straight to the point and called out all BS. No sugarcoating, no tap dancing. Right is right and wrong is wrong. I thoroughly enjoyed this video and y'all's POV. Y'all just gained a new subbie. Thank you!
Love the videos of you and your dad in discussion - it’s a really fun way to understand what is happening
This is like witness intimidation to the nth degree.
It's unfair that a judge he knows is gonna look at this!
Even if he knows them it doesn't mean they have the same moral values. I know a lot of people in the same line of work as me and we don't always have the same moral values.
@@jackiemyers2773I wouldn’t be surprised if glanville gotta phone call explaining how to go about doing this. If this is as bad as the defense alleges it could be a huge house of cards for that entire county
The judge and prosecutors on this case should loose their license. I hope many people complain to the bar.
I think that alot of people have spoken up.
Woody didn't request a meeting with Ural
they thrusted this immunity on him. He didnt want it! He told them over and over! they forced him to testify and intimidated him with jail until "ALL" still awaiting trial were concluded!! Hyland verbally said to him more or less that she would turn a deaf ear if he lied on the stand making it as an "inconsistent statement" but the immunity says he forfeits the immunity if he commits perjury on the stand!! Even better, he never mentioned killing Knut that he "supposedly" to have said. oh the corruption and coercion!!! recusal and mistrial is the only honest thing to happen and disciplinary action against glanville and the state attorneys.
Holy crap, I’m halfway through it and it’s already unbelievable.
They have not noted as the judge reads.He is not noting the fact that he went out of order yelling, almost demanding that he steal debulge his source.He demanded over and ordered and became out of control
Regular citizens are held accountable for omission of facts, therefore, this judge should be as well!!!
I am a member of the State Bar of Georgia and am appalled by what is occurring in this case. In my nearly 40 years of trial practice, I have been blessed never to have had to appear before such an obtuse jurist whose efforts to obfuscate facts are so blatant. For the most part, the other state where I practice has superior (no pun intended) judges who take pride in their work and to whom wearing the robe means something. This judge gives me "man-baby" vibes.
Hi Peter and Pop Tragos ! Been looking forward to this 😊
6 officers, 2 DAs and the judge, and that’s not intimidation?
You do as I say do EVEN if I break all laws because I am chief judge
Thank you Papa Tragos and Peter for continuing to discuss this trial with all of us. 💗 This whole fiasco is wild and something that I have never seen in a trial that I have watched previously.
This Judge didn’t give any of these examples of why he didn’t have to do anything. I think he’s only come up with these as excuses later. He didn’t Confirm the ex partse meeting at all! He refused to release the transcript on 6/10/2024
Agree completely! He conveniently forgot that he DENIED the meeting ever happened and threw Steele in jail because he was pissed he got caught!
I believe Brian steel and weinstein adams and schardt should request the audio recordings if you notice alot of Copeland responses there's a bunch of ---- and it isn't because 2 many ppl are talking 🤔
*_Been waiting on this one guys. Glad to see you and Daddieo. You guys ROCK!_*
You definitely have a great mentor dad to look up to
Anyone surprised that the DA office in Fulton County is unethical?
Nope
That may be the case but the DA does not have any control over judges. That's misleading implying the DA has that control.
@@gcwmn1961 I could be wrong so please don’t get upset with me 😊I don’t think the original post was implying what you think. I took the post to be just about the DAs office. But maybe I am way out in left field here.
But the prosecution has been saying they didn’t know Melnick was his attorney before Woody was called to stand.
Because Woody told them he didn't have anyone representing him.
Meanwhile these defendants are confined with no bond pretty much waiting for the mistrial or appeals court later to reverse any conviction if there is one , electronic leg monitor and allow them a bond being confined this long and still not a bond seems like an injustice as well
The judges and da need to be investigated and go thru all the cases.