good / great non superstar players not getting picked up or being forced to take way less money than deserved + great drafting year over year actively hurting your team is definetly weird and seemingly negative but, it is encouraging more parity than we've seen. Itd be interesting to see where the nba is at with 5 years
@@qKaleit’s a fallacy kind of cause the best player with accruable help will always win unless facing a motions of a team and that shows plu this affects small markets to, and your right on the viewing numbers people been begging for parity but soon as they get it views goes down
@@michaelpaullang4401 yea it's weird. I like it. I like there being many teams that could win each year but I think some people like when dynasty's are around and especially for when those dynasty's get beat
@@qKale well the warriors dynasty was hated because they " Ruined the league", "made the league boring" so they say. People are gonna complain regardless. So i'd rather see a league where superteams don't exist and big market teams can no longer buy their way to chips. More and more players are gonna have to sign to smaller market teams to get their asking price. So i do find this interesting going forward. Ofc i agree that it does have some flaws but only time will tell. Honestly im kinda excited to see how teams handle this new rule.
The Observer and the NBA put these new rules into place to stop the Warriors from spending all that profit on winning more championships! They can't have Steph passing Lebron just like the couldn't have Kobe passing MJ...CP3....also to stop top players from teaming up...they made the cost too high! I just hope the players or teams find loopholes that bite The Observer right in the ass....Rigged BS!
good / great non superstar players not getting picked up or being forced to take way less money than deserved + great drafting year over year actively hurting your team is definetly weird and seemingly negative but, it is encouraging more parity than we've seen. Itd be interesting to see where the nba is at with 5 years
Swear they do everything they can to implement a hard cap... except implement a hard cap 😅
Thank you for explaining this. I am tired of people saying how the Nuggets just "let" KCP go.
Kenny this you?
It’s Clayton Crowley
Anything that continues to push parity is good in my book.
@@zubairzuzu2769Why's that? From a viewership pov I can understand it but I like having more teams that are competitive
Fans don’t want parity and viewing numbers prove it
@@qKaleit’s a fallacy kind of cause the best player with accruable help will always win unless facing a motions of a team and that shows plu this affects small markets to, and your right on the viewing numbers people been begging for parity but soon as they get it views goes down
@@michaelpaullang4401 yea it's weird. I like it. I like there being many teams that could win each year but I think some people like when dynasty's are around and especially for when those dynasty's get beat
@@qKale well the warriors dynasty was hated because they " Ruined the league", "made the league boring" so they say. People are gonna complain regardless. So i'd rather see a league where superteams don't exist and big market teams can no longer buy their way to chips. More and more players are gonna have to sign to smaller market teams to get their asking price. So i do find this interesting going forward. Ofc i agree that it does have some flaws but only time will tell. Honestly im kinda excited to see how teams handle this new rule.
The Observer and the NBA put these new rules into place to stop the Warriors from spending all that profit on winning more championships! They can't have Steph passing Lebron just like the couldn't have Kobe passing MJ...CP3....also to stop top players from teaming up...they made the cost too high! I just hope the players or teams find loopholes that bite The Observer right in the ass....Rigged BS!
Thanks for this cool video 😁, all that’s left to do is advertise it
LeBron signing for less 😂😂😂. He gave up like $500k that is nothing for him
He was going to but the team didn’t get anyone to sign so who’s he supposed to take a pay cut for
Imagine tryna decide what 500k is to a billionaire 😂😂😂
Clayton??
LOL people gonna complain even more there’s no loyalty in the nba when players leave
It should’ve been called “the Lebron Apron “ all this started 14 years ago with the “ decision”
It's all because of this years Boston Celtics! They don't want to see that happen again where a team is that dominant. Go Boston!
We need saudi arab to have a bball league and bring all the good nba players there with massive money
Lebron took 1mil pay cut lol. SMH
whatever, this is nice and all if you are an accountant. bring back hand checks and decapitation defense ..
Lebron’s pay cut is pennies to him.
Thieir Riches make them The Best. Don't Lie too Me.