Ancient Volcano OR Giant Petrified Tree Stump?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 19

  • @briansaenz4392
    @briansaenz4392 Рік тому +2

    Geologists have found "roots" and aren't telling anyone. Controlling the narrative of humans and the Earth. It's why giant bones and mammoths bones were disposed of.

    • @thecuriousvida
      @thecuriousvida  Рік тому +1

      What's wrong with just admitting there is a lot of things us humans just do not know yet right Brian? Maybe one day we'll learn things that will change things we thought we knew. Take care bud ✌🇺🇲

    • @itisjustacomment
      @itisjustacomment 9 місяців тому +2

      You have to ask yourself why they would do that. And why aren't non-geologists finding such things and making them known?

    • @briansaenz4392
      @briansaenz4392 9 місяців тому

      @@itisjustacomment Tartaria was something my Ukrainian exwife and girlfriend spoke about. I have since learned about all the children they sent over to the great lakes area. Freaking Rabbit Hole of information lies and DECEPTION. Be well and stay safe out there 😎👍🤙🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

  • @dalindabarrios4172
    @dalindabarrios4172 Рік тому +2

    Thank you for the taking us with you! Interesting and beautiful nature view! The kids are learning and seeing so much!

  • @MoellerEngineeringCo.
    @MoellerEngineeringCo. Рік тому +2

    I would like to nominate you guys for the cutest family in America.

    • @thecuriousvida
      @thecuriousvida  Рік тому +2

      Aww thanks PrestoWind you always have such nice things to say. Thank you! 😊

  • @jarmyvicious
    @jarmyvicious 4 місяці тому

    Salutations Curious Vida,
    I applaud you for saying how you see things, it is always refreshing to hear an honest opinion rather than an unimaginative, trained and indoctrinated, by the book response that is usually laced with vitriol! Sometimes I believe the slights they cast simply come out of fear.
    I agree with much your surmisations, and even if the thing was proven a volcano I would say the volcano was also a tree....at least from my perspective; it makes sense.
    A volcano could be a tree that at a certain point began to burn slow due to the high moisture content stored or piped up by the trunk, water and wood oil, rendering the wood mass to a molten pulp.
    I believe obsidian is this ultra purified silicate, the frothier tuff is from a dryer wood, ash and cinders and pulp. Ash eruptions result from burnt out root tunnels collapsing, which jettison ash. Magma pools are likely taproot reservoirs, root tunnel collapse and magma coming in contact with ground water could be the catalyst to cause the typical activity most would assume to term as volcanism.
    I think science nuts think way too hard making excuses, why not connect biology with geology instead of distancing the two disciplines, as geology is a state or stage or result of biology. People have a hard time seeing that much dirt and stone was once vegetative or wood, it depends on the level of desiccation, cellular breakdown before the wood entered into an environment conducive to preservation, and then the variety of ways wood makes that change to stone, whether that by mineralization of surrounding soil or chemical nature in a water submersion, electrical shock, etc.... I eould love to hear your opinions! Imagine one of those giant trees breaking, the torrent of water that would flow from a snapped trunk, the vast amount of liquid to provide the turgor pressure, the vast volumes required to keep such a tree rigid and standing! Sending Cheers and Blessings to You and All Yours!

    • @thecuriousvida
      @thecuriousvida  4 місяці тому

      Thanks for the comment! Well I'm no expert and we just enjoy seeing these places in person and trying to comprehend the history from different perspectives. The thing about the scientific theories is that they are just theories right. Lots of things are possible to have existed the many years ago that might be difficult for us to comprehend today. Maybe it is a core of magma that came from underground but then the surrounding area would have been there to support it or it wouldn't be near flat at the top like it is. That would be a lot of erosion that I'm not seeing accounted for anywhere. It's interesting for sure. Wyoming is a great place to get some perspective by looking at the geology and get you asking some questions for sure. You take care and thanks for saying hi. PS- I'm sure everything was bigger back then including the trees.

  • @RioCrypto55
    @RioCrypto55 Рік тому +1

    100% a tree OR a tree like silicate organism

  • @lynnscott8286
    @lynnscott8286 Рік тому +1

    Tree stump

  • @itisjustacomment
    @itisjustacomment 9 місяців тому

    We have the same shape rock Columns in Britain in a few places A giant causeway is the most famous here and Malham Cove I've been lucky enough to see both from Britain and the island.
    Stories here say the giant's causeway was built by giants. At least your tree story is more believable than a bridge for giants in the sea.

    • @thecuriousvida
      @thecuriousvida  9 місяців тому +1

      Haha the stories are fun. Natives tell a story of a giant bear that chased children to the top. But geology says it's from magma I guess igneous formation. Supposed it was a core of a Volcano and the Volcano eroded and left this core. 😎

  • @derpsauce719
    @derpsauce719 Рік тому

    Please go to geology school. Bro.

    • @thecuriousvida
      @thecuriousvida  Рік тому +1

      I just enrolled thanks for the advice ✌

    • @karatachi69
      @karatachi69 Рік тому

      Translation: "Please go get indoctrinated and repeat was others tell you, instead of being a free thinker." 😂😂😂

    • @thecuriousvida
      @thecuriousvida  Рік тому

      Yep nowadays we can't even have a conversation without somebody telling you how stupid they think you are...🤣🇺🇲✌