Very useful, thank you! I just checked and indeed I have it set as broadcast. Edit: in immersive mode the dynamic/directional audio is indeed fixed! You learn something every day - thank you :)
Remember AMS2 has a variety of content that expand way beyond what LMU has to offer and will ever have, just for reference there is almost as many Spa version (not just layout, but different version) than there is total tracks in LMU. Let's not talk about cars... So of course you would hope that LMU has a better version of that car and the hybrid system. LMU better from a pure "sim" perpesctive, AMS2 way better from a "game" aspect.
Thank you for watching and for sharing your opinion! Yes, I agree AMS2 has a lot going for it, especially on the content (modern and historical) Your last sentence "LMU better from a pure "sim" perpesctive, AMS2 way better from a "game" aspect." sums it up very nicely indeed :)
At the end of the day I think both are really fun in their own ways and with the low fuel motorsports and LMU dailies I have a happy range of multiplayer options which is nice
ams2 is as much a sim as lmu. like they said, ams2 can be forgiven for it's limited score in one aspect, makimg up for it in other aspects - like historical content. both are games. borh are sims. one concentrates on simming one thing, the other, something else
there both sims and both fun games, its just masters one motorsport and the other does a decent job with many. I personally prefer a excellent experience with one motorsport rather than a decent experience with 20, but that's just me. The one exception is iracing which manages to have great quality for many different motorsports and has the best multiplayer model. But i would rather play LMU over AMS2 in the same way i would prefer ACC over GT7 or raceroom
Thank you for the insight mate. Maybe I was wrong on this one, but this is how I tested it: So MAX deployment and NO deployment. Kept it in 2nd gear so the speed is consistent and was braking from redline (i think 145km/h if memory serves me right). Default setup and honestly, I felt absolutely no difference between Max deploy and No deploy. Again, maybe I was testing it wrong and happy to explore it further but I felt no difference. I tested on both cold and warm tyres and in both cases was locking at the same time. I also never felt the BB shifting to the rear. I checked the 1.6 development update on Reiza's forum and the only thing I found was: "Added brake by wire simulation (combines mechanical brakes and regen torque while respecting your intended brake bias setting - no other controls as of now)" Now, maybe this is simulated on paper but I never felt the difference while driving :)
Nice to see a good in-depth comparison between the cars in the two sims. I have to say I really enjoy the driving experience in both, and both games provide a really good representation of these cars and their quite complex characteristics. I think LMU as a more focused title does represent this and the other LMH/GTP cars more completely than AMS2, but that is to be expected when the game is tailored to just a few types of car. AMS2 is doing a lot of complex stuff in the background still, and their implementation of the hybrid system is really good, far better than iRacing is doing as we've seen. LMU again is more complete in this regard, but AMS2's options are perhaps more user-friendly, so us mortals don't have to become race engineers alongside drivers. One thing I like about LMU is the onboard sound does seem to represent well the sound characteristics you might expect actually being sat in the car. There's some boxy reverb and other effects that seem to make the core audio sound really immersive there. That their take on these cars is so close to LMU's is a real testament to the good work Reiza have done though!
kinda like AC vs ACC ACC is always gonna be more polished in the gt3 aspect than AC, the whole game is built around it. but as for ACC being "better" or "worse" than AC is more of an opinion than a fact. for gt3 yea def, but in general not so much
Great video, I love both games. About the differences on how fast the tires heat up, Coach Dave Academy released an LMU video today about the GT3 cars (so don't know if the same would apply to the LMDh's)... he says that the tires in LMU should come up to temperature a bit quicker in his opinion, but he does praise the general cold tire behaviour as being realistic. He has real life experience on the car he was driving on the sim so it was an interesting video. Despite the differences I find the the LMDh's to be believable and engaging to drive in both sims.
Your video sums up really well how the two sims are doing right now. From my point of view, im really disappointed that iracing couldn't get as close in terms of simulation of gtps, because when it comes to general optimization and racing experience, it is the best sim out there
in ams2 the full battery thing where the brake bias goes backward/ overall brake power reduces is also a thing, weird how you talk about it only on lmu. especially with the hybrid system completely off you can feel it instantly how the brake bias is way different
Thank you for sharing your thoughts mate. Maybe I was wrong on this one, but this is how I tested it: So MAX deployment and NO deployment. Kept it in 2nd gear so the speed is consistent and was braking from redline (i think 145km/h if memory serves me right). Default setup and honestly, I felt absolutely no difference between Max deploy and No deploy. Again, maybe I was testing it wrong and happy to explore it further but I felt no difference. I tested on both cold and warm tyres and in both cases was locking at the same time. I also never felt the BB shifting to the rear. I checked the 1.6 development update on Reiza's forum and the only thing I found was: "Added brake by wire simulation (combines mechanical brakes and regen torque while respecting your intended brake bias setting - no other controls as of now)" Now, maybe this is simulated on paper but I never felt the difference while driving :)
Thank you so much! Appreciate the support :) The dash is designed for LMU and works limited in AMS2 but still works. Here is the thread on the LMU forums community.lemansultimate.com/index.php?threads/download-here-simhub-dashboards.646/ And here is the direct link to the dash: www.lmu-dashboards.com/2024/Dashboards/Lambo%20SC63/Lambo%20SC63.html
Thanks for this comparison. Both games have their strengths and improvement areas and feel different but in the end I have a lot of fun driving in both. LMU and AMS2 are my favorite sims, though I find LMU to be superior in almost every aspect. Btw, what is your FFB configuration in AMS2?
Thank you mate! :) Yes, I enjoy them both for different reasons as well and that's OK. I drive almost all sims for different reasons and they all have their strong sides! You can see my FFB settings (in game and true drive) in this video: ua-cam.com/video/XjvG2N7gEgY/v-deo.htmlsi=46U3PwvQY9jx0Cpc
Very interesting video and the triple screen immersion is just amazing. What comes to the LMDh simulations, I really don't put much into how the hybrid part is implemented. I mean it's good that AMS2 got rid of the boost mechanism but managin your fuel consumption is really not relevant for me a driver whose longest races are like 3hrs. It really is a pity you didn't compare the driving itself much, because that is the part that interests me. I still feel like AMS2 is too forgiving and allows unrealistic levels of slip angle, while LMU for mee feels a bit numb especially when turning. If Kunos ever decide to venture into the LMDh realm, that is when I will probably start driving them more. Until that happens, they are more or less just a curiosity to me.
Thank you so much for liking the video and for the nice feedback ! Really appreciate it :) I did a couple of "first drive and impressions" videos for the GTPs and the GT3s in AMS2 after the 1.6 came out and this is why I didn't talk about that in this video, but maybe will reconsider for the future videos :) I was mentioning some of your points there. If you want you can check out the videos here: GTP: ua-cam.com/video/NjUy8wAQWo4/v-deo.htmlsi=4gu2IXcjZyLwSyAW GT3: ua-cam.com/video/euClIwHEbVs/v-deo.htmlsi=yiar7sp38_a3wzDV
If you want an AMS2 full replay that's not a race, do this. Let your car sit perfectly still on track until the timer runs out. You will then get a menu that allows you to watch the replay. You can save it then. The other way is to drive down the pit lane the wrong way. You will be D'Qd. The replay menu will come up and you can watch and save then. This same hack works in PC2. They should really fix this in AMS2. Practice replays help improve your driving.
OK these are good and helpful tips, thank you! Will know for the next time but yes we shouldn't need workarounds to be able to save replay at will. Reiza should fix this :)
Thx for the Video!! Do any of you also have problems with the sound in AMS2? In replay, for example, the sound of the vehicle is always very scratchy and sometimes you can also hear short noises onboard.
LMU’s problem is that they build a game simply based on one racing series. That’s why it will always be limited and the least dominant. Why not build a sim on multiple racing series?? (hint hint iRacing). The problem with AMS2 is that it’s far from realistic but it’s still amazing and fun for a way cheaper price. Ultimately iRacing will continue to be king. At the end of the day all 3 of these sims are far from perfect so pick the one that you prefer.
The Hypercars are pretty clumsy at low speeds (generally the case for high downforce cars) as the faster you go, the more grip you have :) It's just a matter of getting used to driving them so stick with them and will get better in time
@ AC1 is my benchmark, I feel in ffb if i ddnt trail brake well and instantly feel understeer and know why and how to fix it. I wish other sims could be as detailed. Nevertheless LMU is fun
I will join many commentators - it is very nicely put together review. However, handling / realism characteristics were replaced with "sorry I had to drive 4th lap". What separate simulator from sim-cade is not a sound in TV view, temp curve that can be fixed fast or even laptime (weight, power, distance - not a difficult formula for a drag or lap calculation). It is all about slip angles. Or, if you forget about "telemetry", the way one can drive fast or on limit in both games. ASM2 is a fantastic simcade. LMU - is up there with iRenting and AssettoCustomizatione, Let's hope this reRefactor2 will be followed by rF3. Bought both products to support a fantastic efforts. Hate Reiza for adding LeMans content while LMU devs are in trouble, a sh!tmove (do your unique thing - historic LeMans,
Thank you for the support and for the feedback! :) In my first impressions videos of AMS2 1.6 I did speak a little bit about the way AMS2 feels and how I still feel this floaty/sliding feeling and feel like the car steers with the rears. Just didn't want to repeat it here so focus on the tyres (more specifically cold) and the Hybrid system :) With regards to the gopro, the wide lens warps the image too much IMO and I don't like it but I got a new camera (not gopro) and will see how it looks :)
Le Mans Ultimate has a weird business model... Early acces AND paid DLC, is weird. first finish the base game and then go work on DLC. And when its out of early acces there will be a montly fee!?!
Thank you for watching mate :) There is no monthly fee for LMU unless you want to run the online championships or have all content from LMU and RF2 included "for free" The online we have today - daily, weekly and special events are and will continue to be free according to their CEO
I cannot help much when it comes to VR but maybe check this channel: www.youtube.com/@MAWvR3ALITY He has been testing all major sims lately and has LMU dialed in. Maybe he can help :)
@@chrisracing81 I disagree, it's an old engine they are using. In fact therefore it should be light on hardware, but it's just a badly optimised simulator just like rfactor 2.
@@Hani_Santa absolutely not, i am running Triple 1440p with ~150 FPS and the FPS are way more stable than in iRacing. The Game has much much better graphics, better sound, better FFB. So with all the things wich are better the Game has higher and more stable FPS.
@@lukebennellick "according to real world drivers" is such a bullshit take though, cause you won't find 2 real world drivers that have the same feelings towards a sim. And FFB is extremely subjective, the seat of pants feeling you like might not be the same another person likes. It's not just outputing the steering column realistic forces, you have to compensate the lack of vibrations, g forces etc
Reiza don't even try to understand the cars they are simulating... it's all base specs copy/pasted over a generic physics model. It's basically what Polyphony do, but the Brazilian dev overprice everything as if it all were premium content, but isn't even close. AMS2 is a fun-ish race game, but not a simulator by any means but the price
Change the audio type in LMU from Broadcast to Immersive, this way you'll have dynamic audio according to your camera position.
Very useful, thank you!
I just checked and indeed I have it set as broadcast.
Edit: in immersive mode the dynamic/directional audio is indeed fixed! You learn something every day - thank you :)
Remember AMS2 has a variety of content that expand way beyond what LMU has to offer and will ever have, just for reference there is almost as many Spa version (not just layout, but different version) than there is total tracks in LMU. Let's not talk about cars... So of course you would hope that LMU has a better version of that car and the hybrid system. LMU better from a pure "sim" perpesctive, AMS2 way better from a "game" aspect.
Thank you for watching and for sharing your opinion! Yes, I agree AMS2 has a lot going for it, especially on the content (modern and historical)
Your last sentence "LMU better from a pure "sim" perpesctive, AMS2 way better from a "game" aspect." sums it up very nicely indeed :)
At the end of the day I think both are really fun in their own ways and with the low fuel motorsports and LMU dailies I have a happy range of multiplayer options which is nice
ams2 is as much a sim as lmu. like they said, ams2 can be forgiven for it's limited score in one aspect, makimg up for it in other aspects - like historical content.
both are games. borh are sims. one concentrates on simming one thing, the other, something else
there both sims and both fun games, its just masters one motorsport and the other does a decent job with many. I personally prefer a excellent experience with one motorsport rather than a decent experience with 20, but that's just me. The one exception is iracing which manages to have great quality for many different motorsports and has the best multiplayer model. But i would rather play LMU over AMS2 in the same way i would prefer ACC over GT7 or raceroom
@Snirby1629 Beautifully said! Thank you for sharing :)
The braking capacity for the GTP's in AMS2 also changes when your battery is full or when you turn the battery off
Thank you for the insight mate. Maybe I was wrong on this one, but this is how I tested it:
So MAX deployment and NO deployment. Kept it in 2nd gear so the speed is consistent and was braking from redline (i think 145km/h if memory serves me right). Default setup and honestly, I felt absolutely no difference between Max deploy and No deploy.
Again, maybe I was testing it wrong and happy to explore it further but I felt no difference.
I tested on both cold and warm tyres and in both cases was locking at the same time.
I also never felt the BB shifting to the rear.
I checked the 1.6 development update on Reiza's forum and the only thing I found was: "Added brake by wire simulation (combines mechanical brakes and regen torque while respecting your intended brake bias setting - no other controls as of now)"
Now, maybe this is simulated on paper but I never felt the difference while driving :)
Nice to see a good in-depth comparison between the cars in the two sims. I have to say I really enjoy the driving experience in both, and both games provide a really good representation of these cars and their quite complex characteristics. I think LMU as a more focused title does represent this and the other LMH/GTP cars more completely than AMS2, but that is to be expected when the game is tailored to just a few types of car. AMS2 is doing a lot of complex stuff in the background still, and their implementation of the hybrid system is really good, far better than iRacing is doing as we've seen. LMU again is more complete in this regard, but AMS2's options are perhaps more user-friendly, so us mortals don't have to become race engineers alongside drivers.
One thing I like about LMU is the onboard sound does seem to represent well the sound characteristics you might expect actually being sat in the car. There's some boxy reverb and other effects that seem to make the core audio sound really immersive there.
That their take on these cars is so close to LMU's is a real testament to the good work Reiza have done though!
Very good summing up. I play both and they are both great titles that actually complement each other nicely.
kinda like AC vs ACC
ACC is always gonna be more polished in the gt3 aspect than AC, the whole game is built around it. but as for ACC being "better" or "worse" than AC is more of an opinion than a fact. for gt3 yea def, but in general not so much
Excellent summary! Thank you for sharing :)
@@yurilopes420 Agree. Better/worse is subjective based on the parameters we use :)
great job! waiting for more! :) incredible to see U developed so much in the last months!
Thank you my friend! Appreciate the feedback :)
@@SimracingGG its your hard work and passion to sim racing for many years :)
Amazing video mate.
Thank you so much !!
Thank you for watching and for the support mate! :)
You're so easy to listen to, and the info is nice and clear. I subbed, looking forward to more of your videos, mate!
Thank you! Appreciate the positive feedback and the sub! :)
Great video, I love both games. About the differences on how fast the tires heat up, Coach Dave Academy released an LMU video today about the GT3 cars (so don't know if the same would apply to the LMDh's)... he says that the tires in LMU should come up to temperature a bit quicker in his opinion, but he does praise the general cold tire behaviour as being realistic. He has real life experience on the car he was driving on the sim so it was an interesting video. Despite the differences I find the the LMDh's to be believable and engaging to drive in both sims.
Thank you! I am very glad you enjoyed the video and thank you for sharing your opinion :)
best explanation ever
very professional
Thank you so much for feedback! Really appreciate it :)
Your video sums up really well how the two sims are doing right now. From my point of view, im really disappointed that iracing couldn't get as close in terms of simulation of gtps, because when it comes to general optimization and racing experience, it is the best sim out there
Thank you so much for the feedback and for sharing your thoughts! :)
Let's enjoy them both, they are both impressive in their own way
Thank you! Agree, we can enjoy them both :)
in ams2 the full battery thing where the brake bias goes backward/ overall brake power reduces is also a thing, weird how you talk about it only on lmu. especially with the hybrid system completely off you can feel it instantly how the brake bias is way different
Thank you for sharing your thoughts mate.
Maybe I was wrong on this one, but this is how I tested it:
So MAX deployment and NO deployment. Kept it in 2nd gear so the speed is consistent and was braking from redline (i think 145km/h if memory serves me right). Default setup and honestly, I felt absolutely no difference between Max deploy and No deploy.
Again, maybe I was testing it wrong and happy to explore it further but I felt no difference.
I tested on both cold and warm tyres and in both cases was locking at the same time.
I also never felt the BB shifting to the rear.
I checked the 1.6 development update on Reiza's forum and the only thing I found was: "Added brake by wire simulation (combines mechanical brakes and regen torque while respecting your intended brake bias setting - no other controls as of now)"
Now, maybe this is simulated on paper but I never felt the difference while driving :)
great comparison ! which dash are you using ? looks perfect for LMDH cars
Thank you so much! Appreciate the support :)
The dash is designed for LMU and works limited in AMS2 but still works. Here is the thread on the LMU forums community.lemansultimate.com/index.php?threads/download-here-simhub-dashboards.646/
And here is the direct link to the dash: www.lmu-dashboards.com/2024/Dashboards/Lambo%20SC63/Lambo%20SC63.html
hey just wondering what seating position do you use? in your videos or is it adjustable for different types of cars
Hey there. I am using kind of a gt position but with me pedals higher. So it's i little bit in between GT and Prototype :)
Thanks for this comparison. Both games have their strengths and improvement areas and feel different but in the end I have a lot of fun driving in both. LMU and AMS2 are my favorite sims, though I find LMU to be superior in almost every aspect.
Btw, what is your FFB configuration in AMS2?
Thank you mate! :) Yes, I enjoy them both for different reasons as well and that's OK. I drive almost all sims for different reasons and they all have their strong sides!
You can see my FFB settings (in game and true drive) in this video: ua-cam.com/video/XjvG2N7gEgY/v-deo.htmlsi=46U3PwvQY9jx0Cpc
Very interesting video and the triple screen immersion is just amazing.
What comes to the LMDh simulations, I really don't put much into how the hybrid part is implemented. I mean it's good that AMS2 got rid of the boost mechanism but managin your fuel consumption is really not relevant for me a driver whose longest races are like 3hrs.
It really is a pity you didn't compare the driving itself much, because that is the part that interests me. I still feel like AMS2 is too forgiving and allows unrealistic levels of slip angle, while LMU for mee feels a bit numb especially when turning. If Kunos ever decide to venture into the LMDh realm, that is when I will probably start driving them more. Until that happens, they are more or less just a curiosity to me.
Thank you so much for liking the video and for the nice feedback ! Really appreciate it :)
I did a couple of "first drive and impressions" videos for the GTPs and the GT3s in AMS2 after the 1.6 came out and this is why I didn't talk about that in this video, but maybe will reconsider for the future videos :)
I was mentioning some of your points there.
If you want you can check out the videos here:
GTP: ua-cam.com/video/NjUy8wAQWo4/v-deo.htmlsi=4gu2IXcjZyLwSyAW
GT3: ua-cam.com/video/euClIwHEbVs/v-deo.htmlsi=yiar7sp38_a3wzDV
If you want an AMS2 full replay that's not a race, do this. Let your car sit perfectly still on track until the timer runs out. You will then get a menu that allows you to watch the replay. You can save it then. The other way is to drive down the pit lane the wrong way. You will be D'Qd. The replay menu will come up and you can watch and save then. This same hack works in PC2. They should really fix this in AMS2. Practice replays help improve your driving.
OK these are good and helpful tips, thank you! Will know for the next time but yes we shouldn't need workarounds to be able to save replay at will. Reiza should fix this :)
Thx for the Video!!
Do any of you also have problems with the sound in AMS2? In replay, for example, the sound of the vehicle is always very scratchy and sometimes you can also hear short noises onboard.
Thank you for the support! :) I haven't had sound issues myself. Maybe what you are hearing is the car bottoming out?
Не знаех че си Българин.Много се радвам
Благодаря много за подкрепата :)
Only the original - LMU!
LMU’s problem is that they build a game simply based on one racing series. That’s why it will always be limited and the least dominant. Why not build a sim on multiple racing series?? (hint hint iRacing). The problem with AMS2 is that it’s far from realistic but it’s still amazing and fun for a way cheaper price. Ultimately iRacing will continue to be king. At the end of the day all 3 of these sims are far from perfect so pick the one that you prefer.
LMU = Best sim these days
AC Evo; "I'll arrive in 3 weeks!😎"
@@frankdiehl8749 lol, and now? This Game will not be such a hardcore sim like LMU.
the sound on LMU is so real and raw. AMS2 sounds Flat
Thank you for sharing your preference! :)
Is it my skill or what, LMU at low speed the car doesn’t have grip.
The Hypercars are pretty clumsy at low speeds (generally the case for high downforce cars) as the faster you go, the more grip you have :)
It's just a matter of getting used to driving them so stick with them and will get better in time
@ AC1 is my benchmark, I feel in ffb if i ddnt trail brake well and instantly feel understeer and know why and how to fix it. I wish other sims could be as detailed. Nevertheless LMU is fun
I will join many commentators - it is very nicely put together review.
However, handling / realism characteristics were replaced with "sorry I had to drive 4th lap". What separate simulator from sim-cade is not a sound in TV view, temp curve that can be fixed fast or even laptime (weight, power, distance - not a difficult formula for a drag or lap calculation). It is all about slip angles. Or, if you forget about "telemetry", the way one can drive fast or on limit in both games. ASM2 is a fantastic simcade. LMU - is up there with iRenting and AssettoCustomizatione, Let's hope this reRefactor2 will be followed by rF3.
Bought both products to support a fantastic efforts. Hate Reiza for adding LeMans content while LMU devs are in trouble, a sh!tmove (do your unique thing - historic LeMans,
Thank you for the support and for the feedback! :)
In my first impressions videos of AMS2 1.6 I did speak a little bit about the way AMS2 feels and how I still feel this floaty/sliding feeling and feel like the car steers with the rears.
Just didn't want to repeat it here so focus on the tyres (more specifically cold) and the Hybrid system :)
With regards to the gopro, the wide lens warps the image too much IMO and I don't like it but I got a new camera (not gopro) and will see how it looks :)
iracing not even up for debate 😂
It's coming in a separate video :)
Seems the least realistic aspect of both is running a massive HUD taking up half your screen 😂
World HUD Championship :D
Le Mans Ultimate has a weird business model... Early acces AND paid DLC, is weird. first finish the base game and then go work on DLC. And when its out of early acces there will be a montly fee!?!
Thank you for watching mate :)
There is no monthly fee for LMU unless you want to run the online championships or have all content from LMU and RF2 included "for free"
The online we have today - daily, weekly and special events are and will continue to be free according to their CEO
worst AMS2 is still early access with a low level physics but they say it's finished and sell DLC, weird
Always the same troll@@kolysion164
LMU is more realistic than AMS2. AMS2 has more Content but LMU has better physics and FFB Effects.
Pretty good summary, thank you for sharing! :)
Tested LMU in VR today and it's truly awful. I feel like a 90 year old with blurring vision and no reactions. The game runs like a blury slug.
Maybe you need better Hardware dude
I cannot help much when it comes to VR but maybe check this channel: www.youtube.com/@MAWvR3ALITY
He has been testing all major sims lately and has LMU dialed in. Maybe he can help :)
@@chrisracing81 I disagree, it's an old engine they are using. In fact therefore it should be light on hardware, but it's just a badly optimised simulator just like rfactor 2.
@@Hani_Santa absolutely not, i am running Triple 1440p with ~150 FPS and the FPS are way more stable than in iRacing.
The Game has much much better graphics, better sound, better FFB.
So with all the things wich are better the Game has higher and more stable FPS.
@@chrisracing81 both sims aren't really that optimised, but for VR Iracing is definitely better optimised then LMU, LMU still needs work.
Ams2 has better ffb, better graphics ect...
With all due respect. This is Blasphemy!
This is nonsense
@lukebennellick every sim has pro and cons. Not everything is good in ams2
@pallevan1977 objectively according to real world drivers AMS2 has worse FFB!
@@lukebennellick "according to real world drivers" is such a bullshit take though, cause you won't find 2 real world drivers that have the same feelings towards a sim.
And FFB is extremely subjective, the seat of pants feeling you like might not be the same another person likes. It's not just outputing the steering column realistic forces, you have to compensate the lack of vibrations, g forces etc
AMS is a piece of shit regarding vehicle rotation. Basically its a drift game
yes
who cares?
Tbh AMS2 shouldn't be compared to a real simulator, anyway very good method and nice comparison
Thank you! :)
Well, one of them is a Sim, the other is not.
Reiza don't even try to understand the cars they are simulating... it's all base specs copy/pasted over a generic physics model. It's basically what Polyphony do, but the Brazilian dev overprice everything as if it all were premium content, but isn't even close.
AMS2 is a fun-ish race game, but not a simulator by any means but the price
And Reiza told you this or you just woke up and realized it? 😂
@@khalidadisa2786 haha he is just a troll. He posts similar stuff in every AMS2 video. Must have been banned from the Reiza forums or something.
You're funny... Or an idiot. Not sure.
@@hugovai89correct answer - you are not sure. and unless you say something about points a person addresses, it is you that sound like "the one".
you are wrong, the price is ok
So I have a rig like yours. How are you recording your sound so well ?
Hi, I am recording the audio in OBS and then merging the audio and the video in Premiere Pro