Crash Test 40mph VS 56mph - How Speed Affects the Severity of Crashes
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 січ 2021
- New AAA and IIHS crash tests reveal that modest speed increases can have deadly consequences.
Small speed increases can have huge effects on crash outcomes, as shown in new crash tests by the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) and Humanetics. The safety organizations conducted crashes at three different impact speeds (40, 50 and 56 mph). They found the slightly higher speeds were enough to increase the driver's risk of severe injury or death.
The AAA Foundation collaborated with IIHS and Humanetics to examine how speed affects the likelihood and severity of occupant injury in a crash. Three 2010 Honda CR-V EX crossovers were used because they represented the average age (11.8 years) of a typical vehicle on U.S. roadways and earned the top rating in the IIHS moderate overlap front test.
As the crash speed increased in the tests, researchers found more structural damage and greater forces on the dummy's entire body.
"Higher speed limits cancel out the benefits of vehicle safety improvements like airbags and improved structural designs," said Dr. David Harkey, IIHS president. "The faster a driver is going before a crash, the less likely it is that they'll be able to get down to a survivable speed even if they have a chance to brake before impact.
At the 40 mph impact speed, there was minimal intrusion into the driver's space. But at the 50 mph impact speed, there was noticeable deformation of the driver side door opening, dashboard and foot area. At 56 mph, the vehicle interior was significantly compromised, with the dummy's sensors registering severe neck injuries and a likelihood of fractures to the long bones in the lower leg.
“Our crash test dummies are instrumented with hundreds of sensors to measure the injury risk so that we understand the scientific limits of safety and injury prevention. Understanding that the risk of serious and permanent injury becomes significantly higher in crashes beyond statutory speed limits clearly demonstrates why there are limits in the first place,” commented Jack Jensen, vice president of engineering at Humanetics.
At both 50 and 56 mph, the steering wheel's upward movement caused the dummy's head to go through the deployed airbag. This caused the face to smash into the steering wheel. Measurements taken from the dummy showed a high risk of facial fractures and severe brain injury.
When correctly set and enforced, speed limits improve traffic flow and maximize all public road users' safety.
► These results are valid only for models sold in the USA
Thanks for watching
Comment, like, dislike, share! 🤟
Don't miss next videos ► goo.gl/5i54Vg
✅ Source: IIHS
Original content at iihs.org or UA-cam channel: / @iihs-hldi
If you are interested to request to use the original content for any purpose, please contact legal@iihs.org. - Авто та транспорт
UA-cam at 1AM: Hey let me recommend you a video about crash testing the same car you drive on a daily basis.
Just drive 50 or below lol
@@ThisIsInput You can drive faster than that because you have to brake before you crash, so if you were going 75 and you slam on the brakes right before the accident, it will happen at about 45-50 mph
🤣
Bruh I'm here to show my mom what it looks like bc she was about to get into a head on collision bc she thought a car was a motorcycle 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️
I also have this car Lol
40mph: Mild to moderate injuries
50mph: Severe injuries
56mph: life threatening injuries
65mph+: Coma or death
It also depend on how the car deflect the energy of the impact.
130mph+ Death
Doubt
@@mann25245 that wouldn’t kill you
Henry Ruggs was going 156 and slowed down to 127 before he hit her car. He and his passenger survived. Crazy to think about
Just the energy load from 50 to 56 was enough to buckle a crucial structural component and that basically cause a domino effect. I still don't understand why crash test are only conducted at 35 or 40mph. They NEED to be at least 55mph by now.
They would all fail. Some cars may not crumple as much but it is the sudden deceleration that kills you, not just the cabin collapsing.
To succeed in a 55mph crash, they'd need to make the vehicle hood and structure several feet longer, maybe another 3 to 5 feet longer which makes the car too heavy and impractical.
Maybe because people brake before a crash?
Because the G force eperienced by crash at that speed is enough to kill on it's own, let alone whatever damages you'll cop from a collapsing structure.
Car manufacturers can stop a car crushing you as the driver, they can't stop the G force when you go from 60 to 0 in a few feet.
@@regulardudegam1ng no they don't always. I had zero time to brake in my recent crash. Going 45mph thankfully not on a faster road. I was passing a side road a lady had a stop sign and she gassed it in front of me just as I came by her road. 100% her fault she admitted fault too. She said she didn't see me but the way she gassed out in front of me sure felt like she was trying to get in front of me but I had maybe 1 second before impact. No time to brake or even take my hands off the steering wheel. Burned my arms from the airbags and bruised chest from the airbag and seat belt. Had two kids in the car thank God it was the front end and they were absolutely fine in their car seats.
To add I had no stop sign I was on a main road.
I was involved in a head on crash today at 50 mph.
2 bones broken in my foot. Car totaled. That half second before the crash was the most terrifying of my life. I don't usually wear a seatbelt but today I was...scary stuff. Wear a fuckin seatbelt.
Glad you made that realization. Also, don’t let folks you are riding with drive like asses. Literally have not talked with a friend since who couldn’t admit going 120mph weaving on the freeway is not dangerous.
I only ride at 50kph motorcycle.
Same here. Broken arm (plate and 7 screws) that went through the windshield and a broken rib. Massive soft body tissue, which I found out a year later is far worst than the broken bones. Moderate TBI = A new life of constant pain. The car was totaled in the crash.
I've been wearing a seat belt for years and thank God. I second this PSA, WEAR YOUR SEATBELT!!!!!!
Is that because the square of 56 is almost twice as much as the square of 40?
Yes
right
Give this guy an A 🤜🏻
Yes. Physics bro.
exactly, since kinetic energy is defined as 1/2mv^2, the square of 56 is double the square of 40
How to transform your 5 star car into a 0 star car. just add 10-20mph
This.
I was traveling 50mph in my girlfriends Volkswagen Beetle got slammed head on by a Buick also traveling 50mph.. the impact made me black out instantly.. woke up in the hospital had several feet of intestines removed plus all sorts of broken bones.. what a fuckin hit wow!!! It has left a permanent scar on my body and my mind. Bless everyone.
50 mph with other car is more then 50 mph with a deformation barrier.
@@pentrudreptate3342 2 oncming car speeds doesn't sum. 2 cars both travelling 50 mph oncoming crah is same to crash to solid wall 50 mph, mythbusters also proved it and it's physics law.
@@kaliikleja read what I write , is exactly what you say.
@@pentrudreptate3342 ok i didn't understand it 100%.
2014 was the intro year to the small overlap test and marked the catchup of all the companies that weren't already doing in-house testing like Volvo. The cars above are 2010 models. I'd like to see this speed comparison with a newer vehicle that passes with a "good" rating in the moderate and small overlap tests. This will show less floorboard and dashboard intrusion. It will be interesting to see how well it fairs compared to the older cars. PS: Speed kills but it's fun so keep it on the track.
PS#2. Yeah….I know this is the moderate overlap test. FFS…my point being, apply this speed test to the small overlap tests that 2014+ cars started to pass with flying colors. That test is conducted a 35MPH. I'd like to see it at a more realistic 60MPH.
Looks like this is the moderate overlap?
2012 was the year for the small overlap front crash test, not -2014- ! but in this video, it’s a moderate overlap crash test!
That's why I have a 2020 toyota camry
Speed doesnt kill sudden stops do
@@robertbennett2796 it's too easy to come to a sudden stop by hitting something.
From 40mph to 56mph, kinetic energy almost doubles, going from 158*mass [J] to 309*mass [J]
(Kinetic energy is (1/2)mv², where v is the speed, and m the mass, but since the mass stays constant it's unnecessary to include it in this case)
csb
How is the difference between 50 and 56 so radical? The damage increased exponentially!
force equation is velocity squared so the 6 miles increases the force by 25%
Not exponentially, quadratically!
@@j5300 Quadratic is exponential
@@j5300 get wr8kt
40 mph = 64 kmh 50 mph = 80 kmh 56 mph = 90 kmh
Thank you
@@elifnd3253 yes 😄video is more instructiive and nice if we have our reference at mind during each crash...
MVP
50mph is 81kmh
40 65
An old Volkswagen GTI saved me and my friends life. I was driving on the freeeay and smacked into a parked pickup truck at around 65mph. We came out with head injuries, stitches, dislocations. ETC… thankfully the guy I hit came out fine with a bit of whiplash. but me and my friend are alive working and able to walk. Thank god for the engineering of some of these cars. Some of us wouldn’t be here if it weren’t for airbags and tests like these.
Your accident was very different from this one, with much less energy involved in the crash. These crash tests simulate crashing into a vehicle traveling towards you at the same speed. By hitting a stationary vehicle that was then able to roll away, most of the energy of the impact was dissipated by that motion.
i am sure your real crash speed was lower than 65 mph.
I had a head on collision at 56mph, I can tell you now, life is much harder on so many levels, and the sad thing you notice is that people can’t tell that something is wrong with you, and it ruined my relationships along the way, a drunk/drugged up driver thought he could end his life by taking me with him, he didn’t succeed at both ends, but did ruin my life I had before hand And the system makes it harder without earning a proper income while waiting, so you lose weight and your sanity while trying to recover.
That's bad man, stay strong
sorry to hear hard crash, but real speed at crash moment was slower
because 56 mph crash kills sadly.
Interesting to see how cars are basically engineered to pass crash tests. At 56 mph the CR-V's actual STRUCTURE collapse past the crumple zone, which almost entirely negates the entire purpose of it. This is kinda important because there are many country roads (undivided roads) where the speed limit is 55-60 (maybe even more), which means a crash like this can occur even without reckless speeding, etc.
But rarely do you crash at highway speeds into something. Usually crashes happen in urban areas and not on straight roads
@@Stubbari half of us lives outside of cities. Half of head on crashes occur on undivided roads with high speed limits. This is actually a very realistic scenario
@@LivingTheDream77 Sure, but head on crashes are still the minority
@@Stubbarilook up that black lady who went 130+mph into a busy intersection in Los Angelos. She survived with scratches. The other 2 cars she t-boned eviscerated on impact. her and her car were like a bullet outta hell.
@@user-mb4ig1bq5p What about it?
I think 0 mph is the safest speed available.
not even if a truck crashed you 😂😂😈
You are an idio*
Truck: Oh, hello there!
*Plows the 0 mph car out of the way
Not if you reach it suddenly.
Salute to that engineering team who built such a marvelous things to save the life of humans. I know the value of this because my family members caught a car accident and with blessings of God they are alive today.
0:06 horn be like:
I was in a 60 mph crash,,,its amazing how I'm still alive
Same last night was so scary
I'm happy your ok
@@saigemorey3392
I
That synth music 🎶 is sick and love that beat
you poor human... next you love elevator and mall music.
@@FM-ks1cs da fuq?
@@FM-ks1cs hey now i loooove elevator and mall music. So soothing and inviting.
Barely Alive would like to know your location
Poorly manufactured EDM
Ok, but if we're being honest, if you pay attention, keep your distance from cars and you're alert you'll probably never actually crash at 56 MPH, for the average reaction time of a human being (0.25 seconds) and then initiating brakes, if you keep two car lengths on the highway you should narrowly avoid a car crash by about a car length.
Tell this to everyone on the opposite lane coming towards you.... That is the problem. Anyone can say these, and live by them honestly... But not everyone do... Sometimes they meet...
Lol, you live on a Highway
0.25 seconds doesn't sound like much but how many feet do you travel in 0.25 seconds @ 56mph?
Noone reacts in 0.25s. Good drivers need 0.5s to react, average drivers about 1.0s. 2 car lengths are not enough on the highway. Minimum at highway speed is 50m, about 10 car lengths. At faster driving even more.
I had driver cross center divider and I ran into them t-bone at 50. Awful crash. Sometimes you have no chance to slow down.
You know those guys who like to drive fast and think they're great drivers in city traffic? Yes this is what happens to those
I know exactly what you mean
This is what happens to those guys, *and* the people they hit. Better road designs are making a difference, with more dual carriageways to reduce / remove the risk of a head-on collision. Also, autonomous emergency braking in modern cars will help reduce velocity of crashes when they happen.
UNFORTUNATELY, those idiots DON'T DIE, only innocent people.
Why? I don't know, ask life.
If they die without compromise other people, or harm others, GREAT FOR THE SOCIETY!!!!!!!
@@MeasureOnce f*ck modern cars jk;)
Interessant waere den strukturellen Kollaps zu wissen, den jeder Hersteller sicher errechnet hat. Die Pflicht diesen zu veroeffentlichen waere gut!
Das wäre weniger nützlich als du denkst. Entscheidend ist die Energie, die auf die Insassen wirkt, also wie die Rückhaltesysteme sie schützen. Autos können tatsächlich zu steif sein und damit zu viel Energie an die Insassen weiterleiten.
I just had an accident going 45 per hour , heavy bruises around my stomach and broken hand and it’s scary seeing this and thinking that’s how I was. ( btw the lady was turning on a blinking yellow light while mines was green going 45 per hour and pretty much hit head on)
When driving to work, I probably went around 40 mph in a curve during winter in a rusty car from the 90s without any airbags, lost control of the vehicle went right into a ditch with trees and big rocks. The car landed upside down and I had to crawl out of it. Zero. Fucking. Injuries. Called my dad to come and await the tow truck and then I called my boss to come pick me up (I told him the car battery was dead) and worked my shift as usual.
Still, to this day I almost can't believe it happened and how I was so chill about, I was mostly pissed because I knew I had to get a new car. Come to think of it, why was my dad so fucking chill about it? He should've beat my dumb ass.
Your dad was probably chill because he was glad you're even alive after that. The car accident itself is enough of a lesson, you don't need to add another layer of punishment on top of that.
Recently I was on the freeway and I rear-ended the car in front of me while going 60-70 mph. I was trying to change lanes and they slowed down and before I could react? Bam! Car was totalled but I had no injuries other than mild whiplash which would take a day to show up. When I called my parents to let them know and to ask them to pick me up, I expected them to be mad but nope, they were just worried for me and happy I was alive.
Sick. Great edition. And good explanation of kinetic energy. There's almost double the energy in that small increment from 40 to 56mph. Can be fatal.
Respect the speed limits!
I had just began begging insurance companies and engaging online users on Reddit to advocate for peeling back on speed limits slightly with some kinds of roads in the name of saving lots of lives. The 5 minutes you save by increasing your speed 10mph is not worth the result of a crash turning fatal. The target of my advocation was states in the open west that have 75mph or higher speed limits. That is ridiculous because if you have a hard impact after losing control at that speed no car safety restraint system or crumple design will save you. I was then elated when the US dept of Transportation came out this week with a plan to do just that.
You wouldn’t think that 10 mph would make that much of a difference. They ought to play videos like this if you go on a speed awareness course in countries like mine where this informative form of rehabilitation is sometimes offered to motorists who are caught speeding.
Now people go 80 all the time
Well 40 and 56 mph is a 16 mph difference, and 50 to 56 is a 6 mph difference.
When i was 6 years old my aunt was driving. My other aunt and my cousins we're there too when we were about to turn we we're sideswiped by a truck going 50mph, all the airbags went off and we all fell into a ditch. We were all wearing seatbelts and the ditch was pretty shallow, Most of us suffered minor injuries. We we're in a 2018 Subaru Forester that time. Truck driver hit a tree hard and suffered Serious injuries on the head because his Isuzu truck was not equipped with airbags. This reminds everyone that a little increase in speeds can have even more effect and kinetic energy to us.
Either bs or you miswrote it, you'd have to be ~10 years now and i doubt you are
the 56 mph impact was so hard that even the key fell out of the ignition
I wonce crashed (as a passenger) at about 30km/h, no injuries for me, but the impact felt pretty strong already.
this is very very interesting and informative. i can now show this to people why driving just a smidge over the speed limit is not advisable. thank you!
Agree. I trie to not drive more than 2mph past the speed limit
Wow there’s so much force involved even the airbags don’t prevent too much
So, if you drive at 65 mph and are able to slow down to 40 mph before crashing. You're good. If you drive at 75 mph and you can only slow down to 56 mph, you're not that good.
I'd love to see the 2021 CRV do the 56 mph test i bet it would be a little more solid
56mph going 56 mph is twice the kinetic energy than going 40 mph
Crv drivers becareful! That's scary at 56 mile crash!
All vehicles would be in the same situation.chances of dieing is high
I was just in a car accident going 60mph when a guy in the center turn lane turned left directly in front of me. I'm lucky to only have shoulder muscle pain and a seatbelt burn. God bless
Good demo. Important to know tho, just because you crash *while* going 50, 60, 70+mph, it doesn't mean you IMPACT at that speed at the perfect (worst, perpendicular) angle. Glancing blows and evasive maneuvers bleed tons of G-force away from impact. With the exception of head-on collisions - avoid those at all costs! Swerve into a ditch and flip if you have to, your chances are better.
Now go look at a Volvo 50mph crash test, the dummy looks comfy the whole time
The 56 mph test is the closest to what a real accident would be on the road, you're traveling 70-80 mph and someone loses control invading your lane, you have 2-3 seconds to brake dropping to 50-60 mph, no my understanding would be more suitable to test cars for speeds like that, and not for 40 mph as is the current standard.
But you'll still rarely hit a stationary object at 50-60mph. Say you're doing 80, guy ahead doing 75 loses control and spins out into your lane. You cant miss, but brake down to 60mph when you hit him. But since he's spinning sideways still with forward momentum (let's say at ~30mph, because 4 skidding tires act as a braking force), your net resultant force of impact becomes ~30mph (60-30). Now you're both still traveling so there may be additional impacts with walls/other cars, but it's very rare to his something solid and perpendicular at 50+ mph and come to an immediate dead stop. Except for head-ons on un-divided farm roads, those are dangerous.
0:01 2010 Honda C-RV moderate overlap IIHS crash test
Excellent
Scary. I'm always worried someone is going to fall asleep at the wheel in oncoming traffic on the open road. And the combined speed will be well over 80MPH
Where do you go over 80mph?
@@Stubbari combined speed
Thanks
1:49 Манекен: -бля, нужно зеркало поправить)
Such a drastic difference!
Damn this is scary... I have a 2010 Crv just like this one and I travel a lot on highways going 65 mph...
Well....normally you would brake a little and not always crash at 65mph, but yea....scary to think about
No worse than any other car similar size and style and age
@@chrishart8548 unless it’s a Volvo
also this is a quarter overlap accident, the worst kind, a head on is less damaging.
@@3addaso know one ever has a head on though
Xc90 same please
Most crashes happens at lower speeds thankfully. Even at highways you usually manage to brake and lose a few mph on the speed before the crash
Most frontal impact crashes happen on the highway at 65-75mph very few happen off the highway at lower speeds, the test should be at minimum 75mph.
@@4nciite Don't you have protective barriers inbetween the lanes in your country on highways?
@@b_rabbit435 Depends on the highway some are only two lanes with no divider or people get on the highway going the wrong way on offramps, that happens a lot unfortunately.
@@b_rabbit435in our country no, And our roads are very narrow
Thank you for asking everyone to keep politics and religion out of the comments. I will not state my opinion. I just appreciate the fact that you made that a rule most of us are not properly educated to argue over those topics, but most of all no one goes on to UA-cam to stay in all the drama. You know, just time to relax and enjoy a couple videos i respect it. There is a time and place for everything.
elements like monocoque chassis & body, found in most cars these days needs to be even more stronger & stiffer, without compromising on weight . . . thanks to ultra high strength & high strength steel used in monocoque chassis/body & space frame arrangement . . . a stiff monocoque should be strong enough to prevent deformation of the pax compartment in a frontal impact (60% offset, 40% offset & 100% offset) at speeds between 65 mph - 75 mph . . . 75 mph is the maximum limit because beyond that it's just laws of physics . . .
an accident usually becomes fatal above 90km (obviously it depends on the vehicle and the impact) the risk drops significantly to 64
They should really try to make cars safer for high speed accidents, even if it means it decreases safety in low speed accidents, most speed limits are over 55.
интересно посмотреть на самые новые машины в таких условиях.. думал 64 км час маловато))
Do 70 vs 80mph.
Now we have people going 80mph on the expressway like it’s nothing
Isn't it amazing to see Formula 1 drivers walk away with almost no injuries after 120+mph crash?
bro did you read how that black lady in los angelos just crashed into the intersection at 130mph and lived?!!! SHE HAD BARELY A SCRATCH. meanwhile the 2 cars she hit head on eviscerated.
Thanks for the emotional music..now I’m sitting here crying wishing for my friend back and for me not to have brain damage.
I crashed my car when I first passed my test through 2 metal fences at around 55 miles per hour thank you god I had no injuries. The car was destroyed but I was looked after that day
40 mph: good 56 mph: acceptable in my ratings
you would be dead in 56mph crash, listen to what they said. Severe brain and neck injury along with other major injuries
@@notmyfaultthisishappening3795 i think 56 mph/90kmh crash is totally bad
@@notmyfaultthisishappening3795 Many people have still survived crashes 60 mph+ and live functionally
@@b_rabbit435 that is not hitting an immovable object with 40% overlap. That would cause death but most real world crashes include some deformable object that is hit. The car doesn't immediately come to a stop with that single impact in the real world. Regardless, nothing is guaranteed and death is highly likely at 56mph.
When you have the option, always drive under 43 mph.
Impact at 56mph is having energy almost twice that of 40mph.
Watching this after my mother crashed at 45mph :s..
In classic fashion, Volvo have been crash testing their vehicles at 50m/h / 80 km/h for years. Even their old, 2004 model year vehicles were already getting crash tested at 72km/h / 46m/h
56mph is 90kmh
I just checked, Volvo tests up to 120 kmh or 75 mph!
@@borisgabeti9802 Indeed it is 🙏🏾
Wow👍
Most of car companies test and prepare their cars to pas US and Europe crash test and that testing speed did not change for a very long time now, so i say lets add 25% speed and see how cars preform then. Lets make them safer and only way is to push car industry to test cars on higher speed...as such they will not get 5 stars safety rating and they will push safety of cars to achieve 5 stars with higher speed to sell their cars
If you notice at 50mph the dashboard and the steering wheel are caving in and at 56 it is caving in more. The biggest threat is the dashboard and the steering wheel. the further apart the driver is from dashboard and steering wheel the safer. Crush zone is only effective 40mph and under.
So what speed do I need to die?
I dont need to see this twice
nice
40 mph = ? kmh
56 mph = ? kmh
pls answer
40 MPH = 64 KM/H
56 MPH = 90 KM/H
@@govinlock8568 wow, makasih/thanks
Remember, kinetic energy increases by the square of the speed.
This is a great real-world example of head-on collisions, which are often partial overlap collisions like this. I'm amazed (horrified) at the signficant deterioration of saftey mechanisms when the impact speed is increased just 6mph. This means that if both your car and the car you hit in this scenario are doing 30mph - both drivers are either killed or horribly brain injured / paralysed.
No, force doesn't multiply like that... 2 identical cars hitting each other at 30 is the same as hitting a deformable barrier at 30...
@@akj2387 If two cars are approaching eachother each going 30mph, the distance between them is shrinking at 60mph. That’s the same as one car going 60mph towards a stopped car. So you’ll have a 60mph crash either way, not a 30mph crash.
@@Sashazurthats not how physics work its still a 30 mph collision
@@princedarkness8029 unless it a volvo vs a dacia sandero
@@Sashazur I used to think this, but no. One reason is when you have head on collision, the weight equality and the deformable nature of the vehicle you close in on and hit, takes part of the brunt of energy. Hitting a 400,000 pound stationary metal brick at 60mph is a lot more similar to two cars head on at 60mph than it is two cars at 30mph. The latter is much softer an impact.
The Volvo would still do well because it’s designed to redirect the cars pathway entirely.
find a crash of volvo hitting moderate overlap at 56, because you can't. Volvo will not survive. Volvo is limited by physics just like every other automaker.
@@notmyfaultthisishappening3795 you entirely missed the point
@@notmyfaultthisishappening3795 volvo has done a 50mph moderate overlap test on an xc90, and it held up extremely well at that speed.
@@vxllfire okay, would you like to participate as a crash dummy in that test?
Now we need to see xc90 56mph test... although im worried it will encourage people if it passes the test
In thailnd this crv g3 price secondhand 300,000-400,00 Baht up to grade optins and engine only 2.0 and 2.4 ivtec i want this one.
It's a great car . Very practical and still looks modern and stylish
Are these tests done with engines running
You need to do 80mph and a 90mph video
Sir i like your video
Cool song
40 mil = 64,37376 kilometre'dir
50 mil = 80,4672 kilometre'dir
56 mil = 90,123264 kilometre'dir.
They really should retire the steering wheel. Have a joystick lever on the middle of the console.
Почему с открытыми окнами? Лобовуха цела, удивительно.
Наверное, чтобы не бликовали стекла. краштесты почему-то всегда с открытыми.
Windows is always down when crash head of driver hit glass too? At 56mph that car look like audi a3/golf IV etc at 40mph
Chinese and Japanese car do safety only to 50 mph, for sales marketing operations
Eye opener
Whats the mass of the car
Oh damn my mom has a 2010 crv
Choosing different car model has different outcome of the safety.
If you actually crash at 50mph plus, there is a very good chance it will kill you, no matter what you drive. The exception are pro racing cars on the nascar etc. But that’s an entirely different animal.
If you got £1000 for every mph you were driving into a wall , how fast would you go
Is the new iihs crash tests???!!
This is the AAA building I think and yes iihs worked with AAA for these test
@@coasterswithjosh this is Calspan, a lab in Buffalo.
If you was going 80 90 mph and crashed into the back of another car or a wall would you survive
56 miles dummy inside how could not the screen broken
Oh this is my car
56MPH guy is badly injured.
Meh, I think I'd survive pretty easily. Mostly because I dont like driving and never leave my house. Heck, I dont even like being passenger or pedestrian... I plan do die the old fashion way- starvation.
Honda???
Yes. Cr-v 3
This honda crv is an old model, it does not have the same level of protection like actual model
That does not matter. The newer model may not crush as much but the same amount of energy will be in the body since it will be moving at the same speed. Airbags can only do so much. Hitting the steering wheel at that speed will cause crippling injury or death.
That is the different between volvo and cheaper car manufacturers, volvo is made to surpass beyond the crash test while regular car manufacturers only made to barely meet the crash test
What's the point if you're still going to die? Making the frame stronger does nothing for what happens to your head when it smashes through the airbag into the steering wheel.
@@notmyfaultthisishappening3795 as far as i know no one died in a volvo since 2004 or something
@@ramadhanisme7 Nononono not true. I saw that too and it said “No one has ever died in a Volvo XC90 since 2004 in the UK”…. They have died in other volvos, and this is just in the UK.
That place that the car was coming from was 40 mph I think they were going a little over that and yeah the biker was definitely under the speed limit but the car should not have been going that fast around those turns
imagine if you were not wearing a seatbelt