Fantastic guide! Ive thousands of hours in Eu4 but never did a world conquest, usually because i get bored end game lol. Maybe with this guide ill seriously try it
Thanks Louis! I’m not going to lie, for me the end-game is also rather boring because it’s always the same. I like adding extra challenges like true one tag, or one culture etc. The latest patch has also added some variety, eg the Far East is more difficult to overcome now. Good luck if you decide to do it!
Finally, a fool who will do things I am too lazy to do ripe for binge watching >:) Jokes aside, really excited for this channel, you seem to be aiming at the content i coincidentally love to watch!
I watch lots of eu4 videos, but this is one of the best I've ever soon. So descriptive and informative. Would love a similar video on France, taking advantage of Ceuta and the tafilalt gold mine, and your opinion on the branching missions
As far as I searched in the wiki, there is an event with tech 12 condition that allows you to change from early serfdom to either enforced/increased serfdom or straight to peasant freeedom. However the MTTH is 1200 months or sth
ok so I re did the search, the MTTH is 450 months, quite big, and minimum tech 12. and then again at tech 17 there will be events regarding serdom or peasent liberation. Anyway, I still advocate for taking early serfdom, since it grants quite a lot of benefits
algorithm has shown me your channel and be praised for that, an interesting video, although I don't play EU4 often, I was engaged. Hope you'll do more :) have you thought about Third Odyssey mod playthrough?
in the next WC video can you please explain how you manage to take so much land early and core it whilst not falling too far behind in tech and ideas as i really struggle with this early game! love you content though its amazing! im addicted to going through all your videos atm haha
Hi, I opened my old save file to check. It appears they fell under the Poland PU and gave me the access, because they stopped rivaling me. I didn’t rival Poland until much later, and I was rivaled only by Denmark and Novgorod at the time. Poland actually had a positive opinion of me due to the “enemy of the enemy” modifier (Denmark being the common enemy). That was my set up. I did this opening 3-5 times and it always worked for me.
@@StrategySphere My workaround to replace your strategy was to restart the campaign lots of times until I managed to to start a war with Lithuania (no alliance with Poland) on the 11th of December using the estate mission. Conquered a path to Moldova. Messy, but it was the best I could pull of :p
Loved your video ! I've been looking for a guide like this for a long time :) May I also ask how you built so many buildings that fast at 52:05 ? Is this a mod or you have a fast click program?
@Strategy Sphere Alright that makes sense :) I was always struggling with the amount of buildings to build when going for blobaggeddon I downloaded an auto clicker just today to cope with it and it suits me as a solution so far Keep up the good work !
Ngl I wouldnt even think about no cbing Byzantium as muscovy. Its an extremely valid strategy for a lot of countries and Byzantium is probably the single best Vassal you could ever have but Moscovy has alot to worry about. Moscovy TECHNICALLY needs to take out the ottomans early but I wouldn’t think that they needed them bad enough to take on Byzantium. I also assumed not fitting Novgorod immediately ment the danes would since they pretty much always attack right after the moscovy ai, but I didn’t realize how crippled Novgorod actually got. Sometimes Novgorod gets so weak Tver is actually able to annex provinces from them meaning you only need 2 wars to annex novgorod vs 3.
Yeah, I only started that Byzantium strategy recently, after my first successful world conquest. In that game I vassalised Byz, Granada, and an a Irish minor - all as Russia before attacking Novgorod. I actually see Novgorod survive well into mid-game lately, looks like they’re now more successful allying Poland and Lithuania.
Small exploit I learned for Danish wars, if you queue a bunch of movements in the Wolgast strait you can usually sneak a high manuever general on to Sjaelland
recently found your channel and loving the content. I loved hearing you pronounce words I've tried and failed at in my games lol. can't wait to see more
Thank you :) I had a linguistic education (learning Chinese, Japanese, Spanish, Russian, English, French…) so I treat words with care. Thanks for noticing!
@@oversizedspeedbump9375 born in Uzbekistan into a Russian/Ukrainian mixed family, spent my life traveling the world :) I can’t even tell what “home” is haha. The longest I’ve lived in one place is actually Switzerland.
Good point - I didn’t mention it in the video, but the Emperor (Bohemia) did declare on me for the Lowlands. It was a super easy war though, Burgundy occupied one of their forts and I peaced out for money.
Very nice video! I learned a lot thanks! My problem in my WC attemps always end up me being too fast and then there being too many rebels because i ate too many provinces and at that point I'm mostly not interested anymore in finishing the wc and just quitting and playing a new save. But seeing how you take your time is very nice. I should also just chill a little bit in my next campaign maybe :D
I can't seem to get the start of the run to work. I run into issue with the ottomans war. It seems to be a timing thing. Can you give advice on the timing in the intro to negate RNG as much as possible?
@@StrategySphere I can't get the Ottomans war to go right. I'm not sure if it's a timing thing on if i finish my sieges too quickly the Ottos don't declare on Byzantium or what. Also, the Ottos seem to keep all of their armies together which makes it difficult to pick them off. When I accepted my peace deal with byzantium, I has all my troops in constantiople so that I could quickly siege down their capital. Not sure if that changers things.
Ahh I see! Two points: - If you could finish the war against Byzantium before the Ottomans declare on them, I would consider it a success. I fought the Ottos out of necessity because they declared fast. - It’s difficult to win an early war against the Ottos. The key is to make them break up their armies and fight them on your forts. I’d try to bait them to siege Constantinople and attack them there. It may be necessary to take more loans and hire more mercenaries… Overall, the no-CB on Byzantium is a relatively advanced strategy. In my Gotland game for example, I had no way to win against the Ottos so I waited for them to peace out Byzantium before signing my own peace with Byzantium.
@@StrategySphere Also, could you explain your start with the estates? I usually see people take estates that reduce advisor costs or load up on estates more than you do. Is there a reason not to?
Hi! I tried this many times, always got access from them. I declared on Byzantium asap and then get the access. I guess they give it to one of the other war participants and I get it conditionally?
Great guide, thanks! One question: is it viable to do it with no PUs and no Burgundy and with Inno instead of religious, while keeping offensive and espionage for the first 3 idea picks?.. Don't really like PUs tbh. Maybe another question: why did you not release more vassals, eg in the Ruthenian lands to minimise admin spent on coring?
Hi! Yes, it’s absolutely viable without PUs. To prove that, I’ve done world conquests as pirate Gotland and Holy Horde Teutons, they can’t PU. Can’t comment on Innovative because I’ve never taken it once in my 7k hours, but I don’t see why it wouldn’t be valid. It could be a good idea to release more nations, but I just didn’t see the need. I was on time for my conquest. Great questions!
I played on 1.35.3 as Novgorod, and the modernization tooltip is still bugged. However, it does grant modernization if your advisor is Germanic culture only. Im not sure about Walloon, but when I had 3 muslim Turkic advisor they didnt give me any modernization as well
How do you get de Event "The Demand for Tribut"? I thought for this Event you have to hold the capital for de Great Hord. Does it also works if your country is big enough? Or does it triggered because Crimea took their capital?
Hehe... many of these things is what I have done as well. No-CB Byzantium to vassalize, but I also no-CB Granada to be able to reach into colonies, and get the awesome Alhambra monument. I try to get the Catholic rebels to convert to Catholic early (from Livonia), so I can get elected HRE emperor, and then do it all back to Orthodox once I pass the Religious equality reform in HRE... All of it is a huge pain in the butt, but fun :)
@@StrategySphere Once I finish my current WC (should be a "one-faith"), I will try to do the one-tag with Russia... This time skipping the HRE (dismantle instead), but no-CB Byz, no-CB Grenada, rush the Siberian Frontier in the old world, then move capital to New World and use Siberian Frontier there to get as many provinces the correct culture as possible... I don't know if that's possible, though...
I tried this start with a No-CB war against Byzantium a couple of times and I find that it just does not work. Invariably, both Novgorod and Lithuania rival you, so you are boxed in and hope for some other war participant to ask Lithuania for access. By that time, Otto has already declared their own war. Or worse, both Venice and Otto declare on Byzantium before you can vassalize them, making it impossible for you to move in the European parts due to their forts. Going straight for Novgorod is the more viable strategy.
Each game is of course different, which is why EU4 is great for replayability. It offers almost endless scenario combinations. Attacking Novgorod and building your power base around the northern trade centers is a great strategy. I would still attack the Ottomans reasonably fast, before they grow out of control.
@@StrategySphere Oh of course, the sooner you give Otto a good kick, the better. Although as Russia you have also a potentially powerful Poland/PLC or Timurids to deal with. If the AI manages to keep Timurid vassals loyal they pack quite a punch.
@@T42nk I agree on the Timmies, they can pack a punch. In my current game they formed Persia (and one of their ex-vassals formed Mughals), quite a challenge. Poland-Lithuania tends to be passive early, in my humble experience. Although if left alone, they’ll grow into a monster :)
Great video! Nice pacing and explanations. I was wondering why you are concentrating the Burgandian land before stating it? Also why do you take espionage as a first(?) idea? Isn't that some kind of a troll pick or did they change that? Keep it up; immediatly subscribed ^^
Thanks for the sub! To your questions: - The Burgundian lands are wrong culture & wrong religion for me, and I really struggled with the governing capacity in the early game. So it made sense to me, but it’s not a must. - The upgraded Espionage is actually a solid idea group now, for the first half of the game at least. I routinely take it as the first idea set and then drop it late game for something more relevant.
Amazing guide, thanks for this. Could you go into this process with Ryukyu? I am trying to get The Three Mountains and World Conqueror at the same time lmao
Thank you :) I might, although The Three Mountains takes a while to set up and complete. If you’re interested, here’s my write-up of doing it by becoming Qing (on an earlier patch though): www.reddit.com/r/eu4/comments/pxbhff/three_mountains_in_1809_no_mayan_horde_no_vassal/?
Ah, did it still work on the very latest patch? I thought they’ve blocked changing the government reform to Parliamentarism if you take it, but I could be wrong.
How the heck did u beat the Ottomans in the defensive war after vassilizing byzantinum. I had a 4/3/0/1 leader the grand army and a fullsize tech3 army and was fighting defensive on mountains terrian and got a 5% disci adivor - there is absolutely no chance - i alt-f4 for like 20 times, even with really good roll streaks there is absolutly no chance to win that fight against a
Not sure why this would be sketchy - it’s my usual opening as Muscovy, I did this at least 5-7 times. You may need to hire some mercenaries and ensure that your vassal armies attach to yours. You may have seen that I’ve hired the Grand Army merc to make sure I have more troops than the Ottos. It’s a classic, mainstream war. Ottomans are very strong early on though, so it’s by no means an easy war - but doable.
Hey there, cool channel and cool guide! :) Are you Italian? Also it might be a good idea to transfer occupation to your subjects before annexing something they have claims on. That way you don't pay diplo and also don't loose crownland if you try to get it up for absolutism.
Thanks - and nope, not Italian, although I live a couple hours away from the Italian border. Great point on the occupation transfer! I try to but forget to do this a lot of times. The crownland aspect is critical indeed.
very good video! but i cant play eu4 in late/end game and try my WC like this or with France due to low fps (3 or 4fps). a month needs about 10 minute to play in war -.- and my pc is high end
Good guide, but i gotta say you missed one thing with the serfdom vs freedom, those early buffs are going to carry you much better than the institution spread till tech ten, and then from tech twelve onward you get a ticking chance to instantly swap from serfdom to the second tier peasant liberation, going straight from -.5 to +.75, and then actually giving you the buffs you want, while this event may take a little bit to actually get if unlucky, the benefits that serfdom gets has been very helpful for starting as moscovy since their starting position is not nearly as strong as it felt int he past. after this event you can rapidly turn modernization up and youve only lost 2 tech tiers of time, which i usually use to reduce the other privileges down anyways as i prepare for absolutism, which i think is a good mechanic to let less experienced players start pulling back the buffs like they should
Thanks - feedback taken! I should have described it as my preference and not as categorically as I did. Interesting perspective, I didn’t do these calculations myself, thank you for those.
@@StrategySphere no problem, i see nothing wrong with what you did, as any experienced player will be fine without the early serfdom buff, and for you I don’t know how long it took for your swap even to fire that gave you the upgraded version, but I had a game where it happened right after tech twelve, and another where it too till much later, so there is risk in screwing over any modernization if you risk it, but early on losing manpower for no real gain is suicidal for almost any other person especially with a start like Muscovy and the nonstop wars you must fight to survive, if anything, I would suggest not even taking freedom at that point until you form Russia just to avoid the early setback
@@omega7700 this makes sense, I agree. Personally, I didn’t struggle with manpower too much but I can see how early serfdom can be helpful. I remember my early days when I had to take Quantity and Defensive as Russia just to survive, lol. Now I almost never take those idea sets, for example…
@@StrategySphere even if you avoid early serfdom, 10% idea spread for the two easiest institutions to spawn is hardly worthwhile when you can dev them so quickly, so waiting until you can actually use the .5 modernization is much better than just taking -20% manpower day one
...pushing into the east first is also a valid option. A bit easier imo since Coalition control is much easier and due to what i explain below Conquering all the trade to feed it towards Novgorod, and then collecting in Constantinople as well later on. Also, even though military hegemon got nerfed... its still better for a WC than economic. You dont even need to adapt the "take their forts so you dont need to siege them" strategy because you get a total of 80% siege ability with a spy network. Additional -10% warscore cost, meanwhile economic does basically nothing for you past 1700 Lastly, a next level strategy from Budgetmonk is to delete all states and culture switch to large culture groups for the "Nationalism" cb. Imperialism is good, Nationalism is better. It allows you to basically full annex Iberia in a single war - another reason why i think going for the east first is better, you can just end the european nations in 2 wars each later on. Since they are your culture you also dont have to care about overextension, you core in 6 months with -65% ccr which means even with 2.000% overextension you cant get rebels as they can only tick up to 60% till the stuff is cored and the unrest is gone. (you still get them in the conquered provinces, i meant everywhere else) If you go for this strat you might need economic hegemon if you arent a good player to keep a high enough manpower pool - since everything is gonna turn into a territory. In my case i spammed regiment centers everywhere to get the 1.000 forcelimit and i was able to play with roughly 700k max manpower pool, was just enough to play.
This is brilliant advice! Good point on the military hegemon, I lost interest in it after the debuff but it could still be valid. I actually tried the nationalism strategy (Siu-King introduced it many years ago) but really struggled with manpower and income. You really have to be good to go for it :)
You recommend not taking early serfdom, but it's dead easy to swith out of it through the events before modernization even becomes a mechanic, no? You basically flip back and forth between the two reforms! At certain points. haha. I think it's worth it for the early bonuses.
Ivan the Terrible's name ISN'T actually poorly translated. Terrible meaning extremely bad is a case of English having added meaning to it...primarily because English ended up having two nearly identical words with very similar meanings, that other word being Terrific. Both words were used to describe things as being of great or extraordinary magnitude. This is why when you go and read some 19th century written by stuffed up British aristocrats from the 19th and early 20th century, you can see both terrible and terrific used to describe the same sort of actions. They might describe moving very fast as moving with most terrible speed OR with most terrific speed. Or even use both. For whatever reason, English authors ended up developing a convention of primarily using terrible to refer to things that the story viewpoint considered bad while using terrific to refer to things the story viewpoint considered good. Because the people who wrote textbooks and dictionaries tended to be rich White Guys of Anglo-French ancestry, aka the same exact group of people who was writing and reading most these novels, this convention was then defined as being the "proper" way of using the words. Meanwhile, Ivan the Terrible's name was originally translated BEFORE this convention arose. So to someone of the time when it was first translated, they would have immediately understood that it was saying that Ivan was Great. The Second thing that happened to Ivan was that History marched on and stopped being so apologetic to the Tsars and with it Ivan. Ivan ordered the Massacre of Novogrod, where he had thousands of people in the city of Novograd murdered for the crime of simply being in a city that he thought that some of the nobles in said city were traitors. He later murdered his eldest son in a fit of anger. This would lead to his succesor being Feodor Ivanovich, who was both very bad at ruling and died childless, meaning the Times of Troubles can be directly blamed on Ivan the Terrible. He also is responsible for vastly increasing the level of autocratic rule the Tsars had, which Russia STILL has yet to recover from the damage to Russian Society of the Tsars doing so. By modern standards, He absolutely is someone who should be filed under the modern definition of Terrible. Much of Modern Russia's problems have roots in people like Ivan the Terrible and their actions.
Hey, nope - can’t be done directly, as far as I know. The only way I’ve found is to deliberately lose those provinces to an enemy and then conquer them back for yourself.
my first attempt at wc, muscovy form russia into persia for the immamate cb. way back i think around 1.23.... good to see another blob channel instead of clicking dev simulator
Do you still retain streltsy after Russian empire? This patch streltsy is quite broken. As long as you have above 1k manpower and money you can just consolidate existing ones and keep on Fighting. I just spamed them and eventually out lasted ottomans.
You do retain them, unless you go revolutionary. If you take the “new order regiments” gov reform, your troops can get up to +25% combat ability every time you press the streltsy button, so yep - they’re great!
Hi! You may have to wait till they fall under Poland’s personal union. This was probably what happened in my game. Then, as long as you haven’t set Poland as rival, they should give the access.
@@StrategySphere 3:18, Lithuania has -116 opinion, -70 trust no PU but somehow granted you access. Looks like i have to wait for PU hoping Ottos dont declare on VIzantija. Ty great video as always
Hmm, I looked at this time stamp but didn't see any gold mines. Maybe it's how the graphic mod shows provinces? EDIT: Ohh, I see what you mean! I believe it's one of the Russian missions which increases the chance of getting a gold mine in Siberia. I didn't even pay attention, lol.
@@StrategySphere nah, i dont think that was it, i was wondering what happened and it doesnt make sense for that province interface to load and also for the province good to show before like 400 settlers. it was probably rendering the good of the province you had previously seen. Also, nice video, hope to see more of this style from you!
If you don't take Novgorod (province ) in first war vs Novgorod you can full annex them in two wars .If you do take Novgorod then they will move capital and essentially you paying the extra cost for two capitals.Tbf useless advice the way u paced the campaign
@@StrategySphere The only thing i haven't tested is if you don't take Arhangelsk (Kholmogory) in the first war then Novgorod can take mission where they build marketplace there and get 6 dev, that could push you over the limit. But if u take Kholmogory you can annex in two wars 100%.
Just found your channel, this is the exact kind of eu4 content I’ve been looking for! Great stuff, hope to see more
Thank you - appreciate your support! More coming :)
Fantastic guide! Ive thousands of hours in Eu4 but never did a world conquest, usually because i get bored end game lol. Maybe with this guide ill seriously try it
Thanks Louis! I’m not going to lie, for me the end-game is also rather boring because it’s always the same. I like adding extra challenges like true one tag, or one culture etc. The latest patch has also added some variety, eg the Far East is more difficult to overcome now.
Good luck if you decide to do it!
I never do world conquest but I really love the way you explain your thought process and give tips on what to do! Keep it up dude!
Thanks much, appreciate your support!
I just watched your One Tag - One faith - One Culture Teutonic campaign. Now I'll binge all your channel videos, your channel is so cool man!
Thanks so much, glad you enjoy them! :)
Honestly your videos are super relaxing and well edited! I feel as if I am learning more about the game myself!!!
Thanks, glad you’re enjoying them!
Easily the best eu4 channel out there love what u do!
Thank you so much :)
I love your music choices! Your video styles are great but it’s a little detail that I enjoy in particular!
Thank you -- glad you like it, personally I love jazz. You can frequently find me zoned out in various jazz cafes across Europe or Japan :)
Yes! I love laid back PDX Grand Strat content!! So happy I found this channel!
Thanks a lot -appreciated! 👍
You deserve to have a lot more subscribers, Alex. Great content, newly subscribed.
Thank you, and I’m glad that you’re here!
Finally, a fool who will do things I am too lazy to do ripe for binge watching >:)
Jokes aside, really excited for this channel, you seem to be aiming at the content i coincidentally love to watch!
Thanks for your support! A fool indeed 😂
I did a WC as France -> HRE back when you could cheese with protectorates. Never again. Please keep up the content!
Thanks, and I agree, it’s a chore. I have a world conquest burn-out after doing a bunch of them.
Amazing stuff! Looking forward to the Korea playthrough you hinted at making a video about!
Thank you! Yep, that will be coming soon. I’m editing a Teutons One Culture setup now, and then will do Korea… thanks again!
I watch lots of eu4 videos, but this is one of the best I've ever soon. So descriptive and informative. Would love a similar video on France, taking advantage of Ceuta and the tafilalt gold mine, and your opinion on the branching missions
Thank you, that’s a great suggestion!
By the way, part 1 of the France video, on your request, is here: ua-cam.com/video/o4zRkxLt3-I/v-deo.html
I even got Ceuta lol :)
@StrategySphere Dude, I saw that and I watched part of it. I'm gonna watch the rest of it when I get off work today! I am hype fr!
@@cameronhendricks5967 👍😀
Don't really play EU4, but I like watching EU4 videos. This is a very good guide.
Thanks Carl - I appreciate! That’s how I’ve been for many years with PUBG, I no longer play it but like some channels dedicated to it.
As far as I searched in the wiki, there is an event with tech 12 condition that allows you to change from early serfdom to either enforced/increased serfdom or straight to peasant freeedom. However the MTTH is 1200 months or sth
ok so I re did the search, the MTTH is 450 months, quite big, and minimum tech 12. and then again at tech 17 there will be events regarding serdom or peasent liberation. Anyway, I still advocate for taking early serfdom, since it grants quite a lot of benefits
Thanks for the trial and research! I guess it’ll come to the personal style, in the end.
algorithm has shown me your channel and be praised for that, an interesting video, although I don't play EU4 often, I was engaged. Hope you'll do more :)
have you thought about Third Odyssey mod playthrough?
Thank you, appreciate your support!
I’ve never played any mods, apart from the simple graphics ones. I’ve only been doing Ironman :)
in the next WC video can you please explain how you manage to take so much land early and core it whilst not falling too far behind in tech and ideas as i really struggle with this early game! love you content though its amazing! im addicted to going through all your videos atm haha
How did you get military access through Lithuania? They rival me 100% of the time and I get -150 points towards getting mil access from them.
Hi, I opened my old save file to check. It appears they fell under the Poland PU and gave me the access, because they stopped rivaling me.
I didn’t rival Poland until much later, and I was rivaled only by Denmark and Novgorod at the time. Poland actually had a positive opinion of me due to the “enemy of the enemy” modifier (Denmark being the common enemy).
That was my set up. I did this opening 3-5 times and it always worked for me.
@@StrategySphere My workaround to replace your strategy was to restart the campaign lots of times until I managed to to start a war with Lithuania (no alliance with Poland) on the 11th of December using the estate mission. Conquered a path to Moldova.
Messy, but it was the best I could pull of :p
@@elsongodinho whoa, that’s dramatic! But actually looks like a great start :)
Loved your video !
I've been looking for a guide like this for a long time :)
May I also ask how you built so many buildings that fast at 52:05 ? Is this a mod or you have a fast click program?
Thank you, glad you found it useful!
And no - I don’t have a mod, I simply accelerated the video :)
@Strategy Sphere Alright that makes sense :)
I was always struggling with the amount of buildings to build when going for blobaggeddon
I downloaded an auto clicker just today to cope with it and it suits me as a solution so far
Keep up the good work !
Ngl I wouldnt even think about no cbing Byzantium as muscovy. Its an extremely valid strategy for a lot of countries and Byzantium is probably the single best Vassal you could ever have but Moscovy has alot to worry about. Moscovy TECHNICALLY needs to take out the ottomans early but I wouldn’t think that they needed them bad enough to take on Byzantium. I also assumed not fitting Novgorod immediately ment the danes would since they pretty much always attack right after the moscovy ai, but I didn’t realize how crippled Novgorod actually got. Sometimes Novgorod gets so weak Tver is actually able to annex provinces from them meaning you only need 2 wars to annex novgorod vs 3.
Yeah, I only started that Byzantium strategy recently, after my first successful world conquest. In that game I vassalised Byz, Granada, and an a Irish minor - all as Russia before attacking Novgorod.
I actually see Novgorod survive well into mid-game lately, looks like they’re now more successful allying Poland and Lithuania.
Хороший гайд, без лишнего петросянства, всё чётко и по делу. Subbed
Благодарю 🤝
In my experience, the event ruler has a real knack for having talented and ambitious daughters
That’s great to know, thank you - will aim to use this in my games.
Small exploit I learned for Danish wars, if you queue a bunch of movements in the Wolgast strait you can usually sneak a high manuever general on to Sjaelland
Thanks - didn’t know! I’ve been doing this manually. Do you queue with “shift + mouse click”?
@@StrategySphere Yes, it's shift + right click which queues up unit movements
Super, thanks a million.
Hi do could you tell me all the scources of missioneries ive got 6, 1 from holy synod, 1 base, 1 from religous ideas, 2 from monuments and 1 from DoF
Hi! As Russia, you could also get 1 from the pentarchy and 1 from owning Rome. So 7-8 in total.
@@StrategySphere Ah ty
recently found your channel and loving the content. I loved hearing you pronounce words I've tried and failed at in my games lol. can't wait to see more
Thank you :) I had a linguistic education (learning Chinese, Japanese, Spanish, Russian, English, French…) so I treat words with care. Thanks for noticing!
@@StrategySphere thats awesome. What country are you from?
@@oversizedspeedbump9375 born in Uzbekistan into a Russian/Ukrainian mixed family, spent my life traveling the world :) I can’t even tell what “home” is haha. The longest I’ve lived in one place is actually Switzerland.
@@StrategySphere thats fucking awesome man, thats what i want to do. So cool. Def will stay tuned to the channel
Great informative video. How did you avoid getting declared on after getting the Burgundian inheritance, by the HRE emperor.
Good point - I didn’t mention it in the video, but the Emperor (Bohemia) did declare on me for the Lowlands. It was a super easy war though, Burgundy occupied one of their forts and I peaced out for money.
Would love to see a video with Saluzzo!
Ahh, I’ve already done a WC as Saluzzo, not a One Faith though. Let me see if I put it in the queue :)
Burgundian Inheritance is way underrated. I go for it in every single run I'm a Christian. 500 free dev is crazy in the early game.
I completely agree. It’s pretty reliable when you understand how the AI works on this.
@StrategySphere it's very reliable if the game crashes
Very nice video! I learned a lot thanks! My problem in my WC attemps always end up me being too fast and then there being too many rebels because i ate too many provinces and at that point I'm mostly not interested anymore in finishing the wc and just quitting and playing a new save. But seeing how you take your time is very nice. I should also just chill a little bit in my next campaign maybe :D
Thanks 🙏 yep, pacing it out is key. The blobbability really shoots up towards the end. Best of luck!
I enjoy your videos, and wish you all success with your channel. What graphics mod do you use?
Thanks much! I’m using “theatrum orbis terrarum,” an Ironman-compatible graphics mod from the Steam workshop.
I can't seem to get the start of the run to work. I run into issue with the ottomans war. It seems to be a timing thing. Can you give advice on the timing in the intro to negate RNG as much as possible?
Hey sure, happy to help! What’s the specific issue you’re facing?
@@StrategySphere I can't get the Ottomans war to go right. I'm not sure if it's a timing thing on if i finish my sieges too quickly the Ottos don't declare on Byzantium or what. Also, the Ottos seem to keep all of their armies together which makes it difficult to pick them off. When I accepted my peace deal with byzantium, I has all my troops in constantiople so that I could quickly siege down their capital. Not sure if that changers things.
Ahh I see! Two points:
- If you could finish the war against Byzantium before the Ottomans declare on them, I would consider it a success. I fought the Ottos out of necessity because they declared fast.
- It’s difficult to win an early war against the Ottos. The key is to make them break up their armies and fight them on your forts. I’d try to bait them to siege Constantinople and attack them there. It may be necessary to take more loans and hire more mercenaries…
Overall, the no-CB on Byzantium is a relatively advanced strategy.
In my Gotland game for example, I had no way to win against the Ottos so I waited for them to peace out Byzantium before signing my own peace with Byzantium.
@@StrategySphere Thank you! this was very helpful. I appreciate your interaction!
@@StrategySphere Also, could you explain your start with the estates? I usually see people take estates that reduce advisor costs or load up on estates more than you do. Is there a reason not to?
How do you get access to lithuania so early? They always start with moscow rivaled in my games so not rivaling them doesnt seem to make a difference
Hi! I tried this many times, always got access from them. I declared on Byzantium asap and then get the access. I guess they give it to one of the other war participants and I get it conditionally?
Great guide, thanks! One question: is it viable to do it with no PUs and no Burgundy and with Inno instead of religious, while keeping offensive and espionage for the first 3 idea picks?.. Don't really like PUs tbh. Maybe another question: why did you not release more vassals, eg in the Ruthenian lands to minimise admin spent on coring?
Hi! Yes, it’s absolutely viable without PUs. To prove that, I’ve done world conquests as pirate Gotland and Holy Horde Teutons, they can’t PU.
Can’t comment on Innovative because I’ve never taken it once in my 7k hours, but I don’t see why it wouldn’t be valid.
It could be a good idea to release more nations, but I just didn’t see the need. I was on time for my conquest.
Great questions!
@@StrategySphere ok. I’ll try it with Prussia then. Thank you😁 Great videos btw, got yourself a новый подписчик)))
@@nikolaitregouet благодарю 👍😂 and best of luck!
I played on 1.35.3 as Novgorod, and the modernization tooltip is still bugged. However, it does grant modernization if your advisor is Germanic culture only. Im not sure about Walloon, but when I had 3 muslim Turkic advisor they didnt give me any modernization as well
Ahh, I see - thank you, good to know!
Ох уж это золото в Златоусте) Thanks for the video !
Куда ж без него :) And thanks!
How do you get de Event "The Demand for Tribut"? I thought for this Event you have to hold the capital for de Great Hord. Does it also works if your country is big enough? Or does it triggered because Crimea took their capital?
Hi, yep - apparently, this event goes away if you grow big enough in development. That’s what happened to me in two different games.
@@StrategySphereor after some time
Hehe... many of these things is what I have done as well. No-CB Byzantium to vassalize, but I also no-CB Granada to be able to reach into colonies, and get the awesome Alhambra monument. I try to get the Catholic rebels to convert to Catholic early (from Livonia), so I can get elected HRE emperor, and then do it all back to Orthodox once I pass the Religious equality reform in HRE... All of it is a huge pain in the butt, but fun :)
@@KennethSlavaAdamson this sounds like a great start. I was never fast enough to grab Granada as a northern nation!
@@StrategySphere But I really focused quite a bit on getting the Great Projects strategically... some of them are just absolutely insane... :)
@@KennethSlavaAdamson it makes perfect sense :)
@@StrategySphere
Once I finish my current WC (should be a "one-faith"), I will try to do the one-tag with Russia... This time skipping the HRE (dismantle instead), but no-CB Byz, no-CB Grenada, rush the Siberian Frontier in the old world, then move capital to New World and use Siberian Frontier there to get as many provinces the correct culture as possible... I don't know if that's possible, though...
I tried this start with a No-CB war against Byzantium a couple of times and I find that it just does not work. Invariably, both Novgorod and Lithuania rival you, so you are boxed in and hope for some other war participant to ask Lithuania for access. By that time, Otto has already declared their own war. Or worse, both Venice and Otto declare on Byzantium before you can vassalize them, making it impossible for you to move in the European parts due to their forts. Going straight for Novgorod is the more viable strategy.
Each game is of course different, which is why EU4 is great for replayability. It offers almost endless scenario combinations.
Attacking Novgorod and building your power base around the northern trade centers is a great strategy. I would still attack the Ottomans reasonably fast, before they grow out of control.
@@StrategySphere Oh of course, the sooner you give Otto a good kick, the better. Although as Russia you have also a potentially powerful Poland/PLC or Timurids to deal with. If the AI manages to keep Timurid vassals loyal they pack quite a punch.
@@T42nk I agree on the Timmies, they can pack a punch. In my current game they formed Persia (and one of their ex-vassals formed Mughals), quite a challenge.
Poland-Lithuania tends to be passive early, in my humble experience. Although if left alone, they’ll grow into a monster :)
Is the Byzantium opener still possible in the current patch (1.37)? Whenever I try I cannot get mil access from Lithuania or the Ottomans
Great video! Nice pacing and explanations.
I was wondering why you are concentrating the Burgandian land before stating it?
Also why do you take espionage as a first(?) idea? Isn't that some kind of a troll pick or did they change that?
Keep it up; immediatly subscribed ^^
Thanks for the sub!
To your questions:
- The Burgundian lands are wrong culture & wrong religion for me, and I really struggled with the governing capacity in the early game. So it made sense to me, but it’s not a must.
- The upgraded Espionage is actually a solid idea group now, for the first half of the game at least. I routinely take it as the first idea set and then drop it late game for something more relevant.
Amazing guide, thanks for this. Could you go into this process with Ryukyu? I am trying to get The Three Mountains and World Conqueror at the same time lmao
Thank you :)
I might, although The Three Mountains takes a while to set up and complete.
If you’re interested, here’s my write-up of doing it by becoming Qing (on an earlier patch though):
www.reddit.com/r/eu4/comments/pxbhff/three_mountains_in_1809_no_mayan_horde_no_vassal/?
Nice video! Why do you concentrate developement from annexed subjects? You can full core it for free so don't you just lose out on developement?
Good point! I was struggling with the governing capacity for most of the first half or so, and decided to take this compromise.
@@StrategySphere Makes sense. Thanks for your answer!
👍
beautifull video!
Thank you very much!
But l switched to parliamentarism and serfdom got removed?
Ah, did it still work on the very latest patch? I thought they’ve blocked changing the government reform to Parliamentarism if you take it, but I could be wrong.
Great guide dude🤝
Thanks much!
you talk about the game very clearly. Like you have a really good mic! lol
Haha thanks. Yep, invested into a high-end Røde :)
Great video!
Glad you enjoyed it!
How the heck did u beat the Ottomans in the defensive war after vassilizing byzantinum. I had a 4/3/0/1 leader the grand army and a fullsize tech3 army and was fighting defensive on mountains terrian and got a 5% disci adivor - there is absolutely no chance - i alt-f4 for like 20 times, even with really good roll streaks there is absolutly no chance to win that fight against a
Not sure why this would be sketchy - it’s my usual opening as Muscovy, I did this at least 5-7 times.
You may need to hire some mercenaries and ensure that your vassal armies attach to yours. You may have seen that I’ve hired the Grand Army merc to make sure I have more troops than the Ottos.
It’s a classic, mainstream war. Ottomans are very strong early on though, so it’s by no means an easy war - but doable.
i am surprised you keep personal unions when becomng a Republic. Good video btw i am glad i found your channel.
Yep, you can’t form new ones (unless with missions like Holland) but you keep the existing ones.
And thanks :)
Hey there, cool channel and cool guide! :)
Are you Italian? Also it might be a good idea to transfer occupation to your subjects before annexing something they have claims on. That way you don't pay diplo and also don't loose crownland if you try to get it up for absolutism.
Thanks - and nope, not Italian, although I live a couple hours away from the Italian border.
Great point on the occupation transfer! I try to but forget to do this a lot of times. The crownland aspect is critical indeed.
@@StrategySphere Ah so it is likely you are a fellow Swiss!
I'm from Zurich btw :)
Nice to “meet” you! Je vis à Genève …
Awesome video! Just one thing. If u could turn down game volume by 20% and up yours 20%?
Oh sorry! Let me fiddle with the settings, thanks for the feedback.
Found your channel, pretty interesting staff here. One question please, could you please share the mods you are using?
Welcome and thanks :) I’m using the “theatrum orbis terrarum” map graphics, Ironman-compatible.
@@StrategySphere thank you@
"pre load my troops in scotland"
do you play eve online by chance?
No, was just messing with my language :)
how did you avoid "emperor demands the lowlands"?
I didn’t - I just forgot to mention it in the video.
The emperor (Bohemia) declared on me, but it was an easy and fast war.
very good video! but i cant play eu4 in late/end game and try my WC like this or with France due to low fps (3 or 4fps). a month needs about 10 minute to play in war -.- and my pc is high end
Hi! Thanks, and sorry to hear. My PC is far from being high-end, but it seems to manage okay the late game. Still not ideal, course!
really good and nice watch good job bro
Thanks much :)
love those channel
Thank you :)
Среди англоязычных гайдоделов ты единственный, кто может произнести слово «местничество»))
Ты из России?
Да, русский - из Узбекистана :)
Thank you for the amazing video, I wish you success! What is your opinion about Crusader Kings 3 and Hearts of Iron 4?
Thanks a lot :) I honestly only tried CK3 (not HOI4) and couldn’t get into in somehow. Maybe later…
Interesting to attack byzantine first, makes sense since ottomans are so OP, but I like to keep ottomans OP so I have a challenge later in the game.
Thank you! And it makes sense, I once let Spain grow massive so I could have a massive end-game boss :)
whats the name of graphic mode you use?
Hi! It’s “theatrum orbis terrarum” from the Steam workshop, Ironman-compatible.
@@StrategySphere thanks, bro. I love it
Good guide, but i gotta say you missed one thing with the serfdom vs freedom, those early buffs are going to carry you much better than the institution spread till tech ten, and then from tech twelve onward you get a ticking chance to instantly swap from serfdom to the second tier peasant liberation, going straight from -.5 to +.75, and then actually giving you the buffs you want, while this event may take a little bit to actually get if unlucky, the benefits that serfdom gets has been very helpful for starting as moscovy since their starting position is not nearly as strong as it felt int he past. after this event you can rapidly turn modernization up and youve only lost 2 tech tiers of time, which i usually use to reduce the other privileges down anyways as i prepare for absolutism, which i think is a good mechanic to let less experienced players start pulling back the buffs like they should
Thanks - feedback taken! I should have described it as my preference and not as categorically as I did.
Interesting perspective, I didn’t do these calculations myself, thank you for those.
@@StrategySphere no problem, i see nothing wrong with what you did, as any experienced player will be fine without the early serfdom buff, and for you I don’t know how long it took for your swap even to fire that gave you the upgraded version, but I had a game where it happened right after tech twelve, and another where it too till much later, so there is risk in screwing over any modernization if you risk it, but early on losing manpower for no real gain is suicidal for almost any other person especially with a start like Muscovy and the nonstop wars you must fight to survive, if anything, I would suggest not even taking freedom at that point until you form Russia just to avoid the early setback
@@omega7700 this makes sense, I agree. Personally, I didn’t struggle with manpower too much but I can see how early serfdom can be helpful.
I remember my early days when I had to take Quantity and Defensive as Russia just to survive, lol. Now I almost never take those idea sets, for example…
@@StrategySphere even if you avoid early serfdom, 10% idea spread for the two easiest institutions to spawn is hardly worthwhile when you can dev them so quickly, so waiting until you can actually use the .5 modernization is much better than just taking -20% manpower day one
@@omega7700 it’s all a matter of preference / style in the end, I guess.
...pushing into the east first is also a valid option. A bit easier imo since Coalition control is much easier and due to what i explain below
Conquering all the trade to feed it towards Novgorod, and then collecting in Constantinople as well later on.
Also, even though military hegemon got nerfed... its still better for a WC than economic. You dont even need to adapt the "take their forts so you dont need to siege them" strategy because you get a total of 80% siege ability with a spy network. Additional -10% warscore cost, meanwhile economic does basically nothing for you past 1700
Lastly, a next level strategy from Budgetmonk is to delete all states and culture switch to large culture groups for the "Nationalism" cb. Imperialism is good, Nationalism is better. It allows you to basically full annex Iberia in a single war - another reason why i think going for the east first is better, you can just end the european nations in 2 wars each later on. Since they are your culture you also dont have to care about overextension, you core in 6 months with -65% ccr which means even with 2.000% overextension you cant get rebels as they can only tick up to 60% till the stuff is cored and the unrest is gone. (you still get them in the conquered provinces, i meant everywhere else)
If you go for this strat you might need economic hegemon if you arent a good player to keep a high enough manpower pool - since everything is gonna turn into a territory. In my case i spammed regiment centers everywhere to get the 1.000 forcelimit and i was able to play with roughly 700k max manpower pool, was just enough to play.
This is brilliant advice!
Good point on the military hegemon, I lost interest in it after the debuff but it could still be valid.
I actually tried the nationalism strategy (Siu-King introduced it many years ago) but really struggled with manpower and income. You really have to be good to go for it :)
You recommend not taking early serfdom, but it's dead easy to swith out of it through the events before modernization even becomes a mechanic, no? You basically flip back and forth between the two reforms! At certain points. haha. I think it's worth it for the early bonuses.
Ah, I see. I tried taking it once and I recall getting into a real bad event spiral... I guess that experience traumatized me :)
Ivan the Terrible's name ISN'T actually poorly translated. Terrible meaning extremely bad is a case of English having added meaning to it...primarily because English ended up having two nearly identical words with very similar meanings, that other word being Terrific.
Both words were used to describe things as being of great or extraordinary magnitude. This is why when you go and read some 19th century written by stuffed up British aristocrats from the 19th and early 20th century, you can see both terrible and terrific used to describe the same sort of actions. They might describe moving very fast as moving with most terrible speed OR with most terrific speed. Or even use both. For whatever reason, English authors ended up developing a convention of primarily using terrible to refer to things that the story viewpoint considered bad while using terrific to refer to things the story viewpoint considered good. Because the people who wrote textbooks and dictionaries tended to be rich White Guys of Anglo-French ancestry, aka the same exact group of people who was writing and reading most these novels, this convention was then defined as being the "proper" way of using the words.
Meanwhile, Ivan the Terrible's name was originally translated BEFORE this convention arose. So to someone of the time when it was first translated, they would have immediately understood that it was saying that Ivan was Great.
The Second thing that happened to Ivan was that History marched on and stopped being so apologetic to the Tsars and with it Ivan. Ivan ordered the Massacre of Novogrod, where he had thousands of people in the city of Novograd murdered for the crime of simply being in a city that he thought that some of the nobles in said city were traitors. He later murdered his eldest son in a fit of anger. This would lead to his succesor being Feodor Ivanovich, who was both very bad at ruling and died childless, meaning the Times of Troubles can be directly blamed on Ivan the Terrible. He also is responsible for vastly increasing the level of autocratic rule the Tsars had, which Russia STILL has yet to recover from the damage to Russian Society of the Tsars doing so. By modern standards, He absolutely is someone who should be filed under the modern definition of Terrible. Much of Modern Russia's problems have roots in people like Ivan the Terrible and their actions.
Thanks for the terrible / terrific perspective. Appreciated!
Early Serfdom is actually good imo since you later get mission that lets you remove it
Ah, I thought that mission came quite late in the game.
is there a way to take provinces from your PUs ? granada did look tasty
Hey, nope - can’t be done directly, as far as I know. The only way I’ve found is to deliberately lose those provinces to an enemy and then conquer them back for yourself.
Just fyi, the thumbnail says "Quide" instead of "Guide".
Thank you so much - now corrected! Should propagate soon.
my first attempt at wc, muscovy form russia into persia for the immamate cb. way back i think around 1.23.... good to see another blob channel instead of clicking dev simulator
Thanks much :) and that looks like a fun strategy!
amazing content
Thank you :)
name of map mod? pls
Hi! The mod is “theatrum orbis terrarum” steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1867433999
@@StrategySphere tysm
I hate that burgundy always gets pretenders in its pu's and then loses them
You should be careful and watch them every once in a while
Yeah, it’s really happening a lot in these patches.
Beautiful guide, I needed this before my russia run
Thank you, glad you found it helpful.
Do you still retain streltsy after Russian empire? This patch streltsy is quite broken. As long as you have above 1k manpower and money you can just consolidate existing ones and keep on Fighting. I just spamed them and eventually out lasted ottomans.
You do retain them, unless you go revolutionary.
If you take the “new order regiments” gov reform, your troops can get up to +25% combat ability every time you press the streltsy button, so yep - they’re great!
@@StrategySphere 25% ?? Holy...
@@bronzedisease yeah, it’s OP…
Hey. Lithuania always hates me and i cant get millitary acess. I am missing something?
Hi! You may have to wait till they fall under Poland’s personal union. This was probably what happened in my game. Then, as long as you haven’t set Poland as rival, they should give the access.
@@StrategySphere 3:18, Lithuania has -116 opinion, -70 trust no PU but somehow granted you access. Looks like i have to wait for PU hoping Ottos dont declare on VIzantija. Ty great video as always
I believe it has something to do with me not setting them as rival, from my side.
pls mod list in steam ?
Hi! It’s steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1867433999
grrrreeeeat video! just one question, what's your map mod?
Thank you! It’s “theatrum orbis terrarum” from the Steam workshop.
@@StrategySphere thank you very much man cheers
30:40, how did u manage to get so many gold mines? :0
or is it bugged
Hmm, I looked at this time stamp but didn't see any gold mines. Maybe it's how the graphic mod shows provinces?
EDIT: Ohh, I see what you mean! I believe it's one of the Russian missions which increases the chance of getting a gold mine in Siberia. I didn't even pay attention, lol.
@@StrategySphere nah, i dont think that was it, i was wondering what happened and it doesnt make sense for that province interface to load and also for the province good to show before like 400 settlers. it was probably rendering the good of the province you had previously seen. Also, nice video, hope to see more of this style from you!
You could be right. It may also have something to do with the Siberian Frontier.
And thanks, more videos on the way :)
I want to ask about your mode settings
Hi! The visual mod is “theatrum orbis terrarum”.
@@StrategySphere thanks for kind answer
Why did you take so long to annex byzantium?
Simply because of the governing capacity, has to share it out among my vassals.
great video brother, I like the map mod your using maybe in a next video you should put the link to the mod in the description or the name of the mod
Thank you! Added the link to a few descriptions, thanks for the idea.
А ты хорош:)
Благодарю :)
молодец
Удачи тебе)
Благодарю :) и тебе!
If you don't take Novgorod (province ) in first war vs Novgorod you can full annex them in two wars .If you do take Novgorod then they will move capital and essentially you paying the extra cost for two capitals.Tbf useless advice the way u paced the campaign
Ah, I didn’t realize this - thank you! It’s not a useless advice at all.
@@StrategySphere The only thing i haven't tested is if you don't take Arhangelsk (Kholmogory) in the first war then Novgorod can take mission where they build marketplace there and get 6 dev, that could push you over the limit. But if u take Kholmogory you can annex in two wars 100%.
Got it. Thanks for the efficiency tip!
Love the guide but good LORD the first 20 years or so are hard.
Thank you - and I agree. Tough start for a smooth ride later on…
Can you do a Castille WC/OF just like this Guide, that was awesome thanks!
Hmm, I’ll put it in the list. Teutons, Korea, then Castille :)
@@StrategySphere Much obliged friend!