Churchill's Plan to Start World War 3 Using German Troops

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 4,2 тис.

  • @ssess5499
    @ssess5499 2 роки тому +4491

    Churchill be like: “world tension is still 100, justify war goal!”

    • @serpentine4842
      @serpentine4842 2 роки тому +194

      It would take about 30 seconds to fully justify

    • @FalkyRocket2222
      @FalkyRocket2222 2 роки тому +84

      @@serpentine4842 on maximum speed

    • @kg7162
      @kg7162 2 роки тому +89

      Yhea but i think he crash bc of to many division the soviet has build

    • @tremedar
      @tremedar 2 роки тому +104

      @@kg7162 A race against time, not to win before the soviets get too strong, but to stop your motherboard, cpu and gpu from catching fire.

    • @Deridus
      @Deridus 2 роки тому +39

      Wow. Y'all are scraping the barrel here, aren't ya?

  • @DiscoBallGaming
    @DiscoBallGaming 2 роки тому +6117

    You already know Churchill would have been a huge fan of Patton, because Patton was already considering this an idea for a long time.

    • @Adogtard
      @Adogtard 2 роки тому +358

      Two bloodthirsty men getting along? Sure, but after seeing this video you must ask yourself: for how long

    • @RichardCranium.
      @RichardCranium. 2 роки тому +185

      @@Adogtard Sure, it "bloodthirsty" to want to remove Stalin and his entourage of criminal rapists from power. Now we might have a WW3 that will be much worse. If Stalin was removed from power we would not have Putin invading Ukraine. Russia was be a first world democracy at peace with Ukraine.

    • @scottanos9981
      @scottanos9981 2 роки тому +71

      Nuke the chinese and soviets? Sounds like all our problems today would have been solved then...

    • @danildyachkov2566
      @danildyachkov2566 2 роки тому +254

      @@RichardCranium. The last time I checked Stalin was not planning to start a WW3. All Stalin wanted is to be left alone for reconstruction.

    • @erikjimenez8671
      @erikjimenez8671 2 роки тому +321

      In hindsight the western allies should have been more aggressive towards the Soviets knowing their involvement prior to operation Barbarosa and the trail of tears leading up to Berlin.

  • @BrickOsBudProductions
    @BrickOsBudProductions 2 роки тому +1763

    3:35 I like how the British soldiers are drinking tea
    And German having beer
    And an American soldier eating a cheese burger
    And some Russians drinking vodka
    LOVE IT

    • @chairsilver2
      @chairsilver2 2 роки тому +16

      lol yeah

    • @iron_boy_2008
      @iron_boy_2008 2 роки тому +12

      Man naturr

    • @emmanuelperez8094
      @emmanuelperez8094 2 роки тому +12

      I noticed that also

    • @scytheofdeath08
      @scytheofdeath08 2 роки тому +14

      It was hilarious 🤣😂

    • @ry4n737
      @ry4n737 2 роки тому +12

      Haha yeah, did love that bit...was like.." hey he's having a tea, oh he has a beer..." 😁

  • @mathiask.5474
    @mathiask.5474 2 роки тому +173

    Churchill: Hey let's start WW3
    MacArthur: *Just what I needed.*

    • @lt8566
      @lt8566 7 місяців тому +4

      Mario music playing

    • @AtiyehSadeqi
      @AtiyehSadeqi 6 місяців тому

      😂 مثلن جنگ ویتنام
      😂😂😂😂

  • @viperaputakeyteaparyou8237
    @viperaputakeyteaparyou8237 2 роки тому +2368

    If it ever happened I don't think we'd refer to it as WWIII, more like another stage of WWII. Still too contiguous to WWII, and with the same participants, to deserve another name.

    • @spacerook5229
      @spacerook5229 2 роки тому +238

      WWII part 2

    • @viperaputakeyteaparyou8237
      @viperaputakeyteaparyou8237 2 роки тому +362

      @@spacerook5229 WWII - Electric Boogaloo
      WWII - This time it's personal
      WWII - The Return of the War
      WWII - Bigger, Longer, Uncut

    • @issa2421
      @issa2421 2 роки тому +126

      WWII - But without that weird mustache guy (miss you boo 💋)

    • @Deridus
      @Deridus 2 роки тому +50

      Assuming that all involved conflicts were included in WW2, it would probably be more akin to the 30 Years war of the 1600's... if the war ended in, say 1949, it would probably just be called the 10 Years War in Europe, much like so many other wars.

    • @raptorfromthe6ix833
      @raptorfromthe6ix833 2 роки тому +19

      world war 2:betrayal

  • @errorinthecode2378
    @errorinthecode2378 2 роки тому +3651

    The animation has changed a lot sinceI first started watching back in 2019. I love it. Keep up the good work.

  • @Sentekuu
    @Sentekuu 2 роки тому +1421

    Imagine if this actually took place, imagine the akwardness of the Polish and German soldiers fighting on the same side of the barricade.

    • @ethanor
      @ethanor 2 роки тому +212

      Against the Soviets, who took part in the invasion of Poland as allies to Germany. Awkward don't seem to quite cover it.

    • @theillusiveman2139
      @theillusiveman2139 2 роки тому +45

      Probably poles would have also sided with soviets

    • @Harsh-tf9he
      @Harsh-tf9he 2 роки тому +44

      it would seem more like a civil war between allied countries, instead of a actual war

    • @flack2998
      @flack2998 2 роки тому +73

      “you know how we kind of destroyed your entire country”
      “yeah”
      “yeah we’re sorry”
      “ok”

    • @seanfernandolopez9139
      @seanfernandolopez9139 2 роки тому +22

      Oh, if you didn't know, Nazis conscripted many Poles right after invading it. Same with the Czechs. Some of them were even sent to Normandy prior to the invasion.
      Many historian believes that the Nazis saw Poles as one of their own.

  • @JonatasAdoM
    @JonatasAdoM 2 роки тому +678

    "Never thought I'd die fighting side by side with a German."
    "What about side by side with a friend?"

    • @glamrockbonnie5983
      @glamrockbonnie5983 2 роки тому +46

      * does a flashback to Caen 1944 *
      " no I don't think so"

    • @wingsofrichard1393
      @wingsofrichard1393 2 роки тому +30

      Ay..... I could do that
      *loads mauser*

    • @EnclaveOfficer1776
      @EnclaveOfficer1776 2 роки тому +6

      W comment

    • @thegreenskull4244
      @thegreenskull4244 2 роки тому +10

      Churchhill started ww2 too

    • @johnpatterson4816
      @johnpatterson4816 2 роки тому +6

      While it sounded good in theory,we need to remember a few things:
      #1:The Western Allies were tired of fighting.They fought their way from North Africa to Germany
      #2:The U.S. Army troops were concerned that they might be shipped to the Pacific to take part in Operation Olympic the planned invasion of mainland Japan.
      I knew a few old timers who were ready to start training for the invasion of Japan in early '46.
      They were grateful and overjoyed when they got the news about the Abombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
      #3:The Russkies had also fought their way from Moscow to Berlin and they weren't gonna be pushovers!!

  • @superjesse645
    @superjesse645 2 роки тому +3487

    Honestly the idea of Operation Unthinkable leaves me with one big question after its declassification:
    How did the Poles feel to learn that the West brewed up a plan to liberate Poland from the Soviets but ultimately never went through on it despite Britain using Poland's fall in 1939 as leverage to fight Germany?

    • @ayron419
      @ayron419 2 роки тому +260

      I'd pose an alternate question as well. How many poles would have wanted to have another world War take place in their backyard, being used as the scapegoat to wipe out communism?

    • @niepowaznyczlowiek
      @niepowaznyczlowiek 2 роки тому +547

      Some Poles waited for the next war, some were relieved it didn't happen, some were dissapointed

    • @PolskiHusar117
      @PolskiHusar117 2 роки тому +601

      I can’t speak for all Poles, but for me it’s a mixed feeling. On one side we lost so many people, our cities got destroyed, we didn’t have much food left and such a war would cause even more death, destruction and famine. But on the other hand, the idea of avoiding 44 years of red tyranny and not losing our eastern territories seems beautiful. But the war would probably last so long that it wouldn’t be worth it.

    • @kubkus9061
      @kubkus9061 2 роки тому +292

      I think for our country it would be better if Churchil war was started. Under comunism we lost much more than during WW2... Living in Poland after WW2 till 1989 was disaster...

    • @APersonOnYouTubeX
      @APersonOnYouTubeX 2 роки тому +24

      Betrayed?

  • @ahmetkarl1229
    @ahmetkarl1229 2 роки тому +510

    wehrmacht: finally the war is over
    churchill: not quite...

    • @allent.g560
      @allent.g560 2 роки тому +20

      The French did use a lot of former Wehrmacht in Vietnam. They suffered very high casualties rate.

    • @matthewgarrity9405
      @matthewgarrity9405 2 роки тому +11

      Henschel Werke:" Naja, werden wir die E Serie wohl nie entwickeln..."
      Churchill:"hold on there chap, get the power hammers back up !"

    • @obelic71
      @obelic71 2 роки тому +7

      Oh scheisse not again!
      Deep sigh follow me we know the way.

    • @Deridus
      @Deridus 2 роки тому +1

      Poland, all of it: *KURWA MAC!*
      Chicago: "Poland calls to us. Boys, grab your horses, the Winged Hussars will ride again!"

    • @typiclyjohny5114
      @typiclyjohny5114 2 роки тому +6

      @@allent.g560 not Wehrmacht but former SS members and former Waffen SS troops soldiers as part of the Legion Etrange

  • @ives3572
    @ives3572 2 роки тому +1418

    "Those who can win a war well can rarely make a good peace, and those who could make a good peace would never have won the war." - Winston Churchill

    • @Adogtard
      @Adogtard 2 роки тому +13

      Winston Churchill was as responsible as Hitler for the escalations that created WWII. I hate him and you for watching this and still quoting him

    • @erikchilders
      @erikchilders 2 роки тому +86

      @@Adogtard check the history books again, it was the previous prime minister that was responsible for the escalation, churchill was elected to deal with the war that had already begun

    • @Charles-pf7zy
      @Charles-pf7zy 2 роки тому +39

      @@Adogtard jeez, sensitive much?

    • @ezzatsalman3489
      @ezzatsalman3489 2 роки тому +7

      @@Adogtard i heard that he was kinda racist but idk if that’s true so umm yeah i guess that was the only thing i hate about him

    • @Adogtard
      @Adogtard 2 роки тому +22

      @Alpex "Ive never bothered doing any research after state funded schools told me what to think" I fixed it for you, no need to thank me

  • @johnstecziv7842
    @johnstecziv7842 2 роки тому +240

    The scary thing is that this almost happened without churchills plan. I had several great unlce in laws that fought in ww2. The troops talked as the fighting got closer and closer to Berlin and many were convinced that they would be back within another 20 years to fight the soviets. When the allies were stationed across from the soviets during the germans surrender, some of the us forces started aiming at the soviets. A commanding officer noticed and ordered them to stand down. They did as ordered otherwise we'd have a completly different history here.

    • @Weeboslav
      @Weeboslav Рік тому

      If nukes didn't became a thing,it probably would happen

    • @goobot1
      @goobot1 Рік тому +10

      Considering ww1 was basically 20 years earlier makes sense. The only thing that stopped it in the 60’s was nukes and they didn’t know about those until after Germany fell

    • @stanchpandora3658
      @stanchpandora3658 8 місяців тому +1

      I dont think a few low IQ US soldiers could have started WW3 lol

    • @bronsonperich9430
      @bronsonperich9430 7 місяців тому

      There's a picture of Allies and Soviets pointing weapons at each other in Berlin.

    • @kalajari1749
      @kalajari1749 7 місяців тому +1

      ​@@bronsonperich9430Tried searching for it and couldnt find it

  • @InfoRanker
    @InfoRanker 2 роки тому +529

    It wouldn’t have been ww3, it would have just prolonged ww2.

    • @zbox4211
      @zbox4211 2 роки тому +79

      ww2.5

    • @demonicthan742
      @demonicthan742 2 роки тому +127

      DLC to World War 2

    • @chrisi7127
      @chrisi7127 2 роки тому +52

      World war 2 Soviet update

    • @mad5479
      @mad5479 2 роки тому +11

      True. The Soviets were still about 4 years from testing their A bomb.

    • @ilikecheese4518
      @ilikecheese4518 2 роки тому

      wwii episode 1

  • @icyknightmare4592
    @icyknightmare4592 2 роки тому +4802

    Imagine being a German in this timeline. You invade the Soviet Union, fight the biggest battles in human history, push to within sight of Moscow but falter, spend the next two years failing to stop the red tide. The war gets all the way back to Berlin, Hitler makes one good decision, but it's too late, the fronts are closing in. The Reich has fallen; you've lost but somehow survived it all. Then, only a few weeks later, Winston Churchill appears and offers you a job. You go with him, end up at some massive staging area in western Germany, and ask him about the job. He turns around with a smile, holding a tommy gun and a cigar and says: "Why Jerry, the job is Barbarossa 2, Electric Boogaloo. Now let's go kill some commies."

    • @thicctony6236
      @thicctony6236 2 роки тому +136

      Thank you Icy Knightmate very cool!

    • @ahmedtulu9303
      @ahmedtulu9303 2 роки тому +27

      The Germans would shoot the british as soon as they got a gun.

    • @adankmeme651
      @adankmeme651 2 роки тому +119

      Epic movie idea

    • @FrankTheThinkTank
      @FrankTheThinkTank 2 роки тому +177

      Ich hätte die Tommygun direkt an Churchill ausprobiert. Greetings from Germany...

    • @sekutard5157
      @sekutard5157 2 роки тому +59

      so funny and yet so cringe

  • @Julliusization
    @Julliusization 2 роки тому +207

    3:35 The Brits, Germans and Americans fighting side by side is indeed a sight to behold

    • @GigaTrap6000
      @GigaTrap6000 2 роки тому +29

      Fun fact: Americans and Germans actually fought side by side during WWII and it was the battle of castle itter

    • @KamiX91
      @KamiX91 Рік тому +8

      United evil. Good trio 👍

    • @Sumschmuck
      @Sumschmuck Рік тому +8

      @@GigaTrap6000 AND IT'S THE END OF THE LINE OF THE FINAL JOURNEY

    • @KamiX91
      @KamiX91 Рік тому

      @@mellohi6175 well hands down only a lunatic would plan a war after 60 million deaths and destruction. You are spot on. Everyone of us every nation has blood on hands.

    • @HurricaneHH
      @HurricaneHH 8 місяців тому +2

      Don't forget the French.

  • @Heypatchdoggo8745
    @Heypatchdoggo8745 2 роки тому +425

    The Part when he said "the plan was based on a Rapid Assault on the Soviet troops Similar to Poland" where the battle scene begins has to be the most British-German-American-Soviet thing ever

    • @oasis1282
      @oasis1282 2 роки тому +4

      British reviving hiter in time for another world war

    • @viceguy4880
      @viceguy4880 2 роки тому +1

      @@oasis1282 revive these arian slaves to fight for the dungeon

  • @NaCl1252
    @NaCl1252 2 роки тому +131

    Churchill thought of Operation Unthinkable.
    *Not so unthinkable huh*

    • @udayshahin10
      @udayshahin10 2 роки тому +6

      Yeah nah he straight up unthinked about it, he's just built diffrent

    • @kevinf.1702
      @kevinf.1702 2 роки тому +2

      If only it came true....

    • @nrw64
      @nrw64 2 роки тому +2

      @@kevinf.1702 then you wouldn't maybe be here because Europe would be doomed and the sovjets would have overrun Europe similar to what they did with Germany. They would not win through logistics or strategists who would overwhelm the whole of Europe with their sheer mass.
      England would quickly find themselves in a situation similar to 1940 and an invasion of Alaska could be expected since the Americans would probably be thrown out first. It was not for nothing that Churchill wanted the German army at his side. After all, they have the most experience with the sovjets as they have fought with them for years and hate them similarly to the Eastern Europeans for their crimes on a Mongolian level. What the Soviet Union did to Eastern Europe and parts of Germany they would only have done to the rest of Europe. They were prepared enough.

  • @marco117sw
    @marco117sw 2 роки тому +1248

    Having the allies and ruskies drink their own respective beverages on the battlefield was a great addition to the animation.

    • @SergamingPlayz
      @SergamingPlayz 2 роки тому +32

      us is different! its borger

    • @badlaamaurukehu
      @badlaamaurukehu 2 роки тому +14

      British ships used to have unguarded beer filled vending machines in the galley. Dunno atm🤷‍♂️

    • @KelsaRavenlock
      @KelsaRavenlock 2 роки тому +3

      I'm fairly certain a Hamburger is not a drink.

    • @somegamer1891
      @somegamer1891 2 роки тому +7

      @@KelsaRavenlock put it in a blender

    • @tamaraschmid1871
      @tamaraschmid1871 2 роки тому

      @Marco Moreno
      ahhhhh ... i love it when a piece of crap say "ruskies" .. i almost want to tell you how a "ruskie" is build.

  • @TheCoranub
    @TheCoranub 2 роки тому +113

    Churchill: "Remember guys, no English."

    • @brian.westersauce
      @brian.westersauce 4 місяці тому

      As of this comment, 104 ppl who this wasn’t a *whoosh* for
      #mw2

  • @Huziharamantics
    @Huziharamantics 2 роки тому +367

    You guys should definitely do more videos on cancelled operations that never happened, because not only is it really fun and interesting, it also serves as how it could've changed the world for good or worse.
    A video on Operation Downfall "The Invasion of Mainland Japan", would be really awesome!

    • @andredavila3731
      @andredavila3731 2 роки тому +7

      Yea this reminded me of that

    • @aldritchdahab9323
      @aldritchdahab9323 2 роки тому +9

      And operation tannebaum by German invasion of Switzerland

    • @mirandalockey7334
      @mirandalockey7334 2 роки тому

      The German empire’s invasion of America

    • @xb70valkyriech
      @xb70valkyriech 2 роки тому +5

      Hey you! Also I agree, operation downfall would be super interesting

    • @hi_lol1912
      @hi_lol1912 7 місяців тому

      Eeeeeeeeeeeeee

  • @stukacommander9664
    @stukacommander9664 2 роки тому +240

    The history you inform is very great been watching you for 2 years now

  • @RoebuckGarrett
    @RoebuckGarrett 2 роки тому +720

    Churchill: **Plans to attack the USSR with German Troops**
    Stalin: *"You were suppose to destroy the Wehrmacht not join them!"*

    • @Karifi
      @Karifi 2 роки тому +1

      Churchill was a rat

    • @nrw64
      @nrw64 2 роки тому +20

      @@Karifi so was Stalin and funny and funny mustache man

    • @parable8711
      @parable8711 2 роки тому +19

      @Luís Pires Barbosa Lima Júnior Only with support of lend lease provided by the USA

    • @hahaper2037
      @hahaper2037 2 роки тому +18

      @@parable8711 The main deliveries began only in 1943-1944 when the outcome of the war had already been decided

    • @parable8711
      @parable8711 2 роки тому +22

      @@hahaper2037 You're talking about field equipment deliveries, what was really important for the Soviet army was 5 million of tons of food products, and even with that much food, 2million citizens died from starvation outside Leningrad. And one more major factor was 97.8% of railway tracks provided by the USA which was mostly their logistics arm. And there is tons of stuff to cover, materials for factories, heavy equipment, radios

  • @gerhardsteinmayer3176
    @gerhardsteinmayer3176 2 роки тому +50

    My father served with the German Kriegsmarine and became a POW in April 1945 at the Isle of Fehmarn. To his surprise he then was suddenly transferred to the 10th Fallschirmjäger division, whitch was held under British command until Labour Party won the elections against Winston Churchill's conservatives. After that the German POW in british captivity had to lay down their personal weapons. Rumors went that Churchill was preparing all German prisoners in the British occupied territory for an imminent roll back against the Red Army.

  • @dinocraftman0096
    @dinocraftman0096 2 роки тому +140

    3:36 I like how the British rifleman briefly pauses to sip some tea before firing again 😂

    • @MandalorV7
      @MandalorV7 2 роки тому +20

      Then the Russians are sharing the vodka. 😆

    • @irmanifchannel2030
      @irmanifchannel2030 2 роки тому +10

      Maybe themself think like
      British:russia so easy to fight "sip"
      Russia: uraaa!!! My throat..... "Drink"

    • @kjragg1099
      @kjragg1099 2 роки тому

      There is a myth that during the Great War the likes of Hitler would set off on their messaging duties at teatime because this was when the British always stopped firing their artillery lol. Nothing gets in the way of a Englishman and his tea break.

    • @XXXTENTAClON227
      @XXXTENTAClON227 2 роки тому

      Historically accurate

  • @AuRoaraAnimations
    @AuRoaraAnimations 2 роки тому +128

    churchill was literally just warming up

    • @amanda4285
      @amanda4285 2 роки тому

      What's your idea about my channel ?
      ua-cam.com/channels/-ZHNksu7UlZ2hiLIvyEw2Q.html

    • @johnfrancis2215
      @johnfrancis2215 2 роки тому

      After Gallipoli he should have cooled down

  • @pabcu2507
    @pabcu2507 2 роки тому +200

    Why couldn’t they just bought the bob semple tank, it’s truly the weapon of mass destruction

    • @TreeBarkSide
      @TreeBarkSide 2 роки тому +39

      It would have been a war crime to use such a devastating weapon.

    • @zad_rasera
      @zad_rasera 2 роки тому +3

      Ikr? Lmao they're so stupid.

    • @udayshahin10
      @udayshahin10 2 роки тому +4

      It would literally stubb your toe....

    • @coldshadow_yt9708
      @coldshadow_yt9708 2 роки тому +2

      @@udayshahin10 **war crimes**

    • @explorer949
      @explorer949 2 роки тому

      @@udayshahin10 worse it could *cause a papercut*

  • @wondertome2023
    @wondertome2023 Рік тому +73

    That British soldier at 3:35 drinking tea while he shoots. I cannot😆😆

    • @Gum167
      @Gum167 Рік тому +4

      That really happened, it's just that against Italy, not the Soviets

    • @1963Austria
      @1963Austria 7 місяців тому

      With the Brits, nothing stopped their spot of tea

    • @stumpien
      @stumpien 7 місяців тому +2

      Nahh but that Soviet soldier 😂

  • @zyanego3170
    @zyanego3170 2 роки тому +823

    Imagine if a Polish Soldier and a Soldier from the Wehrmacht would be forced to fight together against the Soviets.
    -Still a better love story than twighlight-

    • @xeno.protocol
      @xeno.protocol 2 роки тому +45

      *insert LOTR meme*

    • @sithtrooper1948
      @sithtrooper1948 2 роки тому +57

      “WHY IS HE HERE?!”
      “Look dude, we are gonna need all the manpower we got to kick the Russians out of Europe”
      “HE BURNED DOWN MY HOME AND SHOT ALL OF MY FAMLY FOR CHRIST SAKE?!? AND YOU ARE LETTING HIM. OFF THE HOOK!??”
      “Uhhh, the enemy of my enemy is my friend?”

    • @firemangan5024
      @firemangan5024 2 роки тому +191

      Polish soldier: Can’t believe I’ll die side by side with a German.
      German soldier: How about side by side with a friend? :)
      Polish soldier: *Has flashbacks* Eh….

    • @KammalSta
      @KammalSta 2 роки тому +29

      Read about Holy Cross Mountains Brigade. It's not exactly fighting together, but thay cooperate to survive against Soviets.

    • @warpartyattheoutpost4987
      @warpartyattheoutpost4987 2 роки тому +40

      The Soviets invaded Poland in 1939 on the Germans' side, they were allies until Operation Barbarossa. Look up the Molotov-Ribbentrop Treaty. They split up Poland between them. The Polish had no love for either. Now ask yourself why the British declared war on ze Germans for invading Poland but didn't do anything about the Soviets invading Poland...

  • @ponycentaur1456
    @ponycentaur1456 2 роки тому +135

    7:30 THE main importance of keeping the seas in allied hands , is supply line. To keep the supplies from American (unhindered) factories/farms would fuel the constant supplies into europe to help the allies. If they lost the sea, mass supplies would stop, and supplie lines would faltered.
    People forget that supply lines and logistics are one of the top important parts of war.

    • @xXXhighrollerx
      @xXXhighrollerx 2 роки тому +10

      logistics do win wars and this is seen in many conflicts even in present

    • @kadennelms8419
      @kadennelms8419 2 роки тому +4

      @@xXXhighrollerx especially in the Ukraine conflict where Russian troops are abandoning vehicles because of supply issues, can’t get gas quick enough.

  • @vikkimcdonough6153
    @vikkimcdonough6153 2 роки тому +946

    Worth noting that, although the Soviets had more divisions in Europe than the western Allies, they had nearly depleted their manpower reserves by the end of the war, while the Americans still had a large pool of men who could be sent to fight if needed; additionally, the Soviet industrial and agricultural bases had suffered a great deal of damage from the German invasion, while those of the U.S. and U.K. were still mostly (U.K.) to entirely (U.S.) intact.

    • @TheCaptainSplatter
      @TheCaptainSplatter 2 роки тому +15

      Americans would have nukes soon anyway. Moscow would cease to exist.

    • @badlaamaurukehu
      @badlaamaurukehu 2 роки тому +17

      Maybe the Soviets would have fared better if Stalin et al hadn't killed all their half-decent generals.

    • @irunaroundyou
      @irunaroundyou 2 роки тому +77

      + The US was sending a lot of supplies to the Soviet Union which freed up Soviet capability for other wartime materiel (Tanks, Planes)stopping this would mean they would have to take people off from the factories and divert for other purposes i.e. agriculture etc.

    • @FlowDeBandoler0
      @FlowDeBandoler0 2 роки тому +112

      The world would be a way better place if those comminists cease to exist . Shame that the Allies pussied out.

    • @garrettsattem4799
      @garrettsattem4799 2 роки тому +161

      @@FlowDeBandoler0 It’s not that they pussied out. After 6 years of fighting against the most evil empires in world history, you think that the remaining Allies would have the willpower to fight possibly another 6 years against a power that has more soldiers and land to maneuver around?
      Quite simply, even if they wanted to (and believe me, they did) the cost in lives and resources would not have been worth it, even if I do share your sentiments.
      Also, JN Leoncito makes an astute observation that you should take heed to.

  • @irbz2252
    @irbz2252 2 роки тому +42

    This was probably one of my most favorite simple history videos thus far. The art style seems smoother and more fluid, the music and sound affects were all very nicely done. I love possible alternate history and seeing the post war German troops fighting side by side with the British just seems like something you would only ever see in a hearts of iron game. The whole thing seems so surreal and weird like it actually happened in another timeline. Would be cool to see a movie or show kinda like this on the war playing out. Still the same outcome of the British losing the war but what would become of the world had it happened, nukes not being able to be used due to lack of fighter superiority.

    • @Playing096
      @Playing096 9 місяців тому

      Bro check out his news animations

  • @MatthewSmith-to1hz
    @MatthewSmith-to1hz 2 роки тому +287

    3:36
    I love how the british solider just stops in the middle of a battle to drink his tea, the American has two guns and a cheese burger, the German solider has an emergency beer stein and the Russian soilders just stop to drink Vodka.
    little things like that don't need to be in there, but they really add to the video's quality.

    • @moonpride9073
      @moonpride9073 2 роки тому +4

      @Kewlysiak And don't forget that he has lots of medals on him. 😂

    • @unclesam5230
      @unclesam5230 2 роки тому +4

      @@moonpride9073 he’s also overweight and smoking a Cigar too

    • @IntrovertRahulRK
      @IntrovertRahulRK 2 роки тому +1

      Copy comment... But little bit change to not get caught

    • @MatthewSmith-to1hz
      @MatthewSmith-to1hz 2 роки тому +1

      @@IntrovertRahulRK I didn't know it was

    • @moonpride9073
      @moonpride9073 2 роки тому +1

      @@unclesam5230 Yup, he's already overweight because he ate too much burgers and two Russian soldier gopniks squats while drinking vodka while shooting. 😂😂😂😂😄🤣🤣😆😆😆

  • @_vla
    @_vla 2 роки тому +104

    So you're telling me that Red Alert could had been real in 1945?

  • @Freedomlander_101
    @Freedomlander_101 2 роки тому +205

    In some alternate universe, WW3 actually happened thanks to Operation Unthinkable

    • @justadogobeingdogo5766
      @justadogobeingdogo5766 2 роки тому +12

      Honestly wonder how all that turned out 🧐

    • @nrw64
      @nrw64 2 роки тому +35

      I think it would be just a another Phase for WW2.

    • @hazmatgamer
      @hazmatgamer 2 роки тому +24

      It would still be counted as WW2 just different arc or phase.

    • @thunderbird1921
      @thunderbird1921 2 роки тому +1

      World War II was still ongoing until September 1945, so it would have been merely the next phase of the war.

    • @justadogobeingdogo5766
      @justadogobeingdogo5766 2 роки тому

      @SjcE eh probably

  • @thesecond4767
    @thesecond4767 2 роки тому +21

    The cowards cry “War!” Behind their computer screens.

  • @Soccer_lover986
    @Soccer_lover986 2 роки тому +64

    Love how that soldier had a sip of tea at 3:35 lol

    • @garageofscrap
      @garageofscrap 2 роки тому +12

      And the German soldier had a beer, the American had a burger, and the Russians had vodka

  • @traviscrum5860
    @traviscrum5860 2 роки тому +55

    Outstanding animation work! Still has the same look and style as it did in the beginning but updated quite well. From the more unique overall movements between the characters to the details in them and their equipment to the greatly increased scale when necessary in some scenes, it's quite nice to look at.

  • @ahmetkarl1229
    @ahmetkarl1229 2 роки тому +488

    britain: i hate nazis, what about you?
    soviets: they are invading us, we hate them too
    britain: cool, we can be allies until germans are defeated. after that it gets difficult...

    • @warpartyattheoutpost4987
      @warpartyattheoutpost4987 2 роки тому +67

      britain: i hate nazis, what about you?
      soviets: we helped them invade Poland in 1939 and split it up between us and we're both raping and pillaging it.
      britain: that's ok, we're only mad at they nazis, you can do whatever you want... for now.

    • @guimot0123
      @guimot0123 2 роки тому +14

      @@warpartyattheoutpost4987 USA, France and Britan: "We also finance Hitler in his ascension to power, held a lot of treaties and acords with him and did nothing to prevent the Third Reich to became a powerful threat .......simply put, we can tolerate nazis if they are against communism, unless they became out of control"

    • @BirdieTheGreat
      @BirdieTheGreat 2 роки тому +17

      @@warpartyattheoutpost4987 Britain did the same in France but at a much smaller scale

    • @bradley8575
      @bradley8575 2 роки тому +1

      China:I hate the Japanese Soviets and western allies can we join together to defeat the fa it’s against Nazis and Japanese an dafter that we will likely fall to communism and after that it will get difficult
      Western allies and Soviets:We hate the Japanese too let’s fight.

    • @Bibky
      @Bibky 2 роки тому +7

      @@warpartyattheoutpost4987
      Britain: Causes a man-made famine in India that kills millions, Churchill directly is against decolonization, restricted political activites in colonies, directly against nationalist movements in British Colonies and continues to rape and pillage multiple colonies around the world.
      Also Britain: We suddenly care about democracy and liberalism!!! Those damn communists won't allow freedom!!

  • @lightweight3908
    @lightweight3908 2 роки тому +11

    @ 3:37 the british soldier fighting while drinking tea is priceless. 😂

  • @ronin3381
    @ronin3381 2 роки тому +211

    4:06 Tigers, M46 Pattons and Centurions fighting side by side. That would’ve been quite a sight.

    • @Deridus
      @Deridus 2 роки тому +26

      Imagine Germans flying P51's vs the Yaks. Now that'd be an interesting flight.

    • @DulocGuardsman
      @DulocGuardsman 2 роки тому +26

      Now that's a crossover

    • @randomperson5775
      @randomperson5775 2 роки тому +42

      Just another day in war thunder

    • @bobajedi
      @bobajedi 2 роки тому +2

      Me262?

    • @Deridus
      @Deridus 2 роки тому

      @@bobajedi I have my doubts on whether or not the ME262 would be worth much compared to the theoretical dumpdrucks worth of prop aircraft like the P51 that would be dropped off... Not to mention, logistics would be a total clusterbomb to clean up.

  • @sterbi9722
    @sterbi9722 2 роки тому +67

    I love how they crammed in a bunch of stereotypes so they could stay as unbiased as possible

  • @ΚοινωνικόςΟρθολογιστής

    I love your timing Simple History. Well done. Keep on the good work.

    • @amanda4285
      @amanda4285 2 роки тому

      What's your idea about my channel ?
      ua-cam.com/channels/-ZHNksu7UlZ2hiLIvyEw2Q.html

  • @evil993
    @evil993 2 роки тому +50

    Y'know, it's pretty disingenuous to say that the soviets had 2.5 times the men simply because they had 2.5 times the divisions. Their standard rifle division was thousands of men smaller than their western counterparts, at full strength. I highly doubt many of the closest Soviet divisions towards the west were anywhere near full strength at that time. Though I'm not saying that means an attack by the west would've been feasible just that the numbers were not anywhere near 2.5 times the men.

    • @iMajoraGaming
      @iMajoraGaming 2 роки тому +2

      I mean, no, not really, all the data we have shows that the USSR flatly outnumbered the Allies' planned strength in Western Europe, in every way.
      Their entire strategy was fundamentally based around that fact.
      They themselves knew and historical records show that yes, the Soviets would have outnumbered the Allies by 2.5 to 1. That's not just in division quantity, real life is not Hearts of Iron IV. They had more actual men too. That was a basic fact of Allied contingency plans.
      It's disingenuous to pretend to have cracked the code and figured out that all that data and Allied planning was a lie because you found out that USSR division composition and organization was different.
      They still outnumbered the Allies. 2.85 to 1 by some estimates. They had several thousand more aircraft too.

    • @AFT_05G
      @AFT_05G 2 роки тому +5

      @@iMajoraGaming There is no way Soviets had more aircraft imo.Americans alone produced twice the amount of Soviets produced between 1940-1945 despite the fact their models were way more expensive ones than Soviet aircraft.
      US could easily outproduce Soviets even without cutting the naval production.
      Even though on paper Red Army was larger than Allied Armies they were nowhere near as well equipped and well supplied.

    • @jansobieski3127
      @jansobieski3127 2 роки тому +4

      @@iMajoraGaming yes buts the Soviet supply lines were out strechted, their soldiers were less trained than the Allied soldiers, the Allied had a way better airforces and a bigger and better naval forces, also the Allied had a better industry and supply lines. And of course the nuclear bomb.

    • @tetraxis3011
      @tetraxis3011 2 роки тому +2

      The Red Army had around 12 million soldiers. That’s probably the largest army in history.

    • @davidfinnegan1425
      @davidfinnegan1425 2 роки тому +1

      And way more tanks

  • @ives3572
    @ives3572 2 роки тому +252

    "In War: Resolution. In Defeat: Defiance. In Victory: Magnanimity. In Peace: Good Will." - Winston Churchill

    • @Adogtard
      @Adogtard 2 роки тому +16

      "In peace good will" after watching this you still brainlessly quote him, with this hypocritical statement no less!

    • @ewanstardis8462
      @ewanstardis8462 2 роки тому +14

      @@Adogtard are you just replying to every Churchill quote. Damn no life much

    • @NguyenMinh-vs1vm
      @NguyenMinh-vs1vm 2 роки тому +9

      @@Adogtard Jesus you’re commenting on every thread here

    • @ives3572
      @ives3572 2 роки тому +1

      @@Adogtard Keep yapping man!😁🤪

    • @azimisyauqieabdulwahab9401
      @azimisyauqieabdulwahab9401 2 роки тому

      Winston Churchill is a racist like Boris Johnson, Donald Trump & Vladimir Putin

  • @joselee9605
    @joselee9605 2 роки тому +389

    Could you imagine how pissed and demoralized allied soldiers would be hearing that they would need to face the Soviets? People in the comments like thinking of war, but based on their thirst for it it’s clear they’ve never experienced it

    • @badcholesterol
      @badcholesterol 2 роки тому +128

      For some reason the biggest cowards are usually the most bloodthirsty.

    • @lewycraft
      @lewycraft 2 роки тому +54

      In all honesty, Polish soldiers would more motivated than ever to keep fighting, possibly the same with German soldiers wanting to keep Germany united. But yeah, British, French and American troops would have enough, they would most likely not go any further, unless it were Soviets that attacked.

    • @richsmith7200
      @richsmith7200 2 роки тому +31

      The American public would never have supported a post war conflict with Russia. Now, however........things have certainly changed.

    • @joselee9605
      @joselee9605 2 роки тому +14

      @@richsmith7200 Very true, the modern day Americans could easily beat the Russians in a modern day war, but a 1945 US vs the Soviets is a far different story

    • @richsmith7200
      @richsmith7200 2 роки тому +25

      @@joselee9605 people don't realize how large the Russian army was after WW2, even with their phenomenal losses. Sadly, history isn't really taught any more. My high school days, we had WW2, Korea, and Vietnam War veterans teaching.

  • @doggydude2668
    @doggydude2668 2 роки тому +1847

    Freaking love how the soldiers had their own personal enjoyments while fighting tea,Mug Root Beer,burger and vodka
    Good job lol

    • @Panzerkampfwagen6aufst.E
      @Panzerkampfwagen6aufst.E 2 роки тому +89

      Actually what the german had was normal alcoholic beer not the pop root beer

    • @kingwolfboss6144
      @kingwolfboss6144 2 роки тому +22

      @@Panzerkampfwagen6aufst.E he’s trying to keep it pg

    • @kfas4410
      @kfas4410 2 роки тому +41

      @@kingwolfboss6144 as a German, i don’t think this needed to be PG.

    • @florians9949
      @florians9949 2 роки тому +20

      When tea, beer and big mack goes against vodka.

    • @Redkodiak1994
      @Redkodiak1994 2 роки тому +16

      Spaghetti and sushi would of been Italy and Japan

  • @PixelHistory
    @PixelHistory 2 роки тому +31

    *British Economy:* Finally, I can take a deep breath of fresh a...
    *Churchill:* How about no.

  • @Lifeiscoolandstuff
    @Lifeiscoolandstuff 2 роки тому +7

    3:36 British soldier still love drinking tea even if they are in a battlefield😂

  • @IAmJustACritic
    @IAmJustACritic 2 роки тому +23

    It is only a British man who can be in the heat of warfare and still sip his tea delicately.

    • @amanda4285
      @amanda4285 2 роки тому

      What's your idea about my channel ?
      ua-cam.com/channels/-ZHNksu7UlZ2hiLIvyEw2Q.html

  • @CheezeSpartan
    @CheezeSpartan 2 роки тому +13

    Churchill to the krauts:
    *You are now attacking!*
    *Teams have been Auto-balanced*

  • @Dan-qu9vb
    @Dan-qu9vb 2 роки тому +15

    3:41 that is the most accurate representation of a average American ever

  • @ceotriston5771
    @ceotriston5771 2 роки тому +7

    3:30 lol we got all of them drinking some sort of item that people stereotype their country by

  • @jinglejangle3287
    @jinglejangle3287 2 роки тому +8

    Your animations really improved. Now we can see empty cases from guns even on the bolt actions rifles.

  • @darthzayexeet3653
    @darthzayexeet3653 2 роки тому +124

    Imagine being a German Soldier in the Wehrmacht sent to fight the Soviets in Stalingrad, lose, get pushed back all the way to Berlin and then being forcefully recruited by the British to fight the Soviets *AGAIN* all the way to the Ural Mountains

    • @costliercart7195
      @costliercart7195 2 роки тому +34

      Obviously realistically the allies would've been quickly swept to the sea if the operation actually took place, most people simply are not able to grasp just how powerful the Red Army really was by 1945

    • @firemangan5024
      @firemangan5024 2 роки тому +23

      @@costliercart7195 I think thats too far fetch but yeah, combined with the equipment they got from lend lease the Soviets would’ve pushed the allies back to the Rhine river, the allies would use their advantages to create a defensive at the river to prevent another Dunkirk.

    • @justarandompersonininterne6583
      @justarandompersonininterne6583 2 роки тому +5

      @@firemangan5024 and a stalemate

    • @brandonarmienti7734
      @brandonarmienti7734 2 роки тому +46

      @@costliercart7195 No. The Western Allies had more equipment, supplies and combined a larger airforce compared to the Soviets. Just because one side has a huge number of soldiers doesn't automatically mean that they win.

    • @Deridus
      @Deridus 2 роки тому +12

      A lot of soviet wins in 1944 was because of attrition, not great strategy or tactics. Too much of the Red Army's doctrine was tied up in politics to reach it's full potential, much like Germany's military and economy was handicapped by it's perverse philosophies regarding labor and it's pervasive xenophobia.
      TL;DR: once America got it's logistics train secured, the Soviets on the Western front would be doooooooomed.

  • @stuff9680
    @stuff9680 2 роки тому +182

    The Soviet Red Army was having man power problems by 1943 and by the battle of Berlin the units that attacked Berlin were only at 80% strength, the reason the Soviets had more divisions was that they were smaller in terms of manpower

    • @north_warwolf1183
      @north_warwolf1183 2 роки тому +21

      Not to mention, a lot of those divisions were almost anhiliated in the ensuing tide in Germany. Plus, for every Zhuckov, [who's loyalty to the USSR would be... Questionable given how close he was with Ike], you had a 1945 Era Putin and Tsar Nicholas commanding other overall fronts. Plus, the Anglo-American-Polak Airborne Army was a MASSIVE tactical asset compared to the extremely infant VDV and Spetsnaz. And he did downplay air power. I'm quite confident once the IL-2 fleet of the USSR was decapitated, the US P-47's and British Hawker Typhoons would've been much more of an asset against Soviet logistics [which were already near breaking at times], and Soviet combat, especially armored formations. I mean, the Germans ANHILIATED A WHOLE ARMORED CORPS [Or division) WITH STUKA'S IN KURSK! The US could easily do the same, especially if those Naval and Marine Avaitors could join the fight.
      Then the Whermacht divisions with their remaining Tigers, Panthers, Panzer IV's, and other such weapons along with lended Sherman's and other designs would've been a sight to behold, especially when you consider they still had quite the considerable K/D Ratio against Soviet T-34's.
      When you consider that Germany would still be able to put up quite a fight for their size, and that the USSR was I'm quite a precarious position, and not to mention you'd be putting the Chuck Yeagers and the Erich Hartmann's of the war together on the same side, it's not quite as simple as "HEHE! URRRRA GO BRRRRRR!"

    • @mestupkid211986
      @mestupkid211986 2 роки тому +15

      The Soviets also organized their divisions differently compared to ours.

    • @north_warwolf1183
      @north_warwolf1183 2 роки тому +2

      @@mestupkid211986 , True!

    • @leomduffy794
      @leomduffy794 2 роки тому +7

      True sadly I see as of today Russia has not changed by using overwhelming numbers with this unnecessary war in the Ukraine. Just using wave after wave of troops. But the soviet build-up to the battle of Berlin was crazy I think it was at least 1.5 million soldgers agenst the last of the last of what Germany could even scrape up. Thd Germans still in 1945 caused the red army a million causalitys.

    • @north_warwolf1183
      @north_warwolf1183 2 роки тому +4

      @@leomduffy794 , Yeah. That is quite true. Honestly, with modern warfare [please don't make a COD or Captain Price reference], it seems as if those massive wave tactics just won't work. Because with NATO you have such well trained, elite formations using such integrated combined arms tactics.

  • @dfsempire2712
    @dfsempire2712 Рік тому +3

    Time traveler kicks rock, the timeline.

  • @beanmanbutchina
    @beanmanbutchina 2 роки тому +23

    If this actually happened, it wouldn’t be called WW3 it’s be called WW2’s second part

  • @jovanlipovatz4503
    @jovanlipovatz4503 2 роки тому +29

    It was called Unthinkable for a reason. I don't think it was ever seriously considered, even if planners were tasked with putting together a serious analysis.

  • @ibanheadhunter8317
    @ibanheadhunter8317 2 роки тому +20

    3:35. I cracked up a bit when I saw the soldiers from different nations had food they are well known for next to them.
    The British with their tea
    The Germans with their beer
    The Americans with their cheeseburgers
    The Soviets with thier vodka

  • @RealSludge
    @RealSludge 2 роки тому +2

    3:35 Love how the Soldiers all have their favorite things to eat/drink

  • @gerardanderson9665
    @gerardanderson9665 2 роки тому +17

    I've been watching simple history since 2017 when I was just 10. Now the animations are now greatly improved but I miss the old school one though.

    • @itsjustanapple5452
      @itsjustanapple5452 2 роки тому +1

      Lol i was 14 then and now i am 19 almost 20 even.
      How fast time flies...

  • @mrmr446
    @mrmr446 2 роки тому +127

    When peace was an option the army would have mutinied rather than go along with another example of Churchill being strategically inept, he also proposed D-Day going through Portugal and Spain and was behind the disastrous Gallipoli campaign. It was Churchill who agreed that Poland would be in Soviet sphere of influence at a conference with Stalin.

    • @Lunkwow
      @Lunkwow 2 роки тому +28

      It was FDR that held all the cards, Churchill knew his bargaining power was useless at that point in the war. It was USA that could push Stalin for more but FDR was so sick at the end of his life that he conceded to Stalin and he is one that will take the cake and the table too if he can.

    • @RoachChaddjr
      @RoachChaddjr 2 роки тому +35

      Gallipoli is the only time Churchill has been strategically inept. As for the D-day in Portugal, well it never happened so how will we know the answer to that?

    • @user-nu7nd7lf4j
      @user-nu7nd7lf4j 2 роки тому +1

      Churchill also suggested a debarkation in the Balkans

    • @mk-ultraviolence1760
      @mk-ultraviolence1760 2 роки тому +6

      @@RoachChaddjr The Italian and Sicilian campaigns beg to differ.

    • @mrmr446
      @mrmr446 2 роки тому +17

      @@RoachChaddjr Neither Portugal nor Spain were in the war, both were neutral and assisted the allies as much if not more than the axis, so it would have needlessly expanded the conflict.

  • @mikeratixxd7397
    @mikeratixxd7397 2 роки тому +37

    Imagine living in the soviet union post WW2, you just survived the most devastating war in All human history, And then a british guy Gets the idea of "How about we do it again?", thats Really messed up

  • @gayan2517
    @gayan2517 2 роки тому +25

    The greatest thing happened after WW2 was that Churchill lived enough to see the British empire collapse.

  • @spamuraigranatabru1149
    @spamuraigranatabru1149 2 роки тому +215

    Don't forget without lend lease explosives and trucks, the Soviets would be extremely short on actual usable numbers. It would be far more sustainable material wise for the allies.

    • @davidmike3560
      @davidmike3560 2 роки тому +21

      Should of attacked and eliminated them commies.the world would be a better place.

    • @andershargrave7246
      @andershargrave7246 2 роки тому +2

      In 1945 soviet union almost stopped using lend lease trucks and other stuff. Because in Kremlin they were not retarded. They ordered to replaced all lend lease vehicles with their own, using new factories

    • @gamingjamie9415
      @gamingjamie9415 2 роки тому +27

      A) Most of Lend Leased vehicles were Interwar ones which were already outclassed, they were used as "in case of dire need". Equipment which could be used was upgunned and uparmoured to be useful.
      B) Without Commies ya would be living without minimal wage, free helthcare and worker rights. You would be = slave to whoever you are employed to. Only thing you could somewhat decide in was your personal life.
      C) I am unaware lend lease had explosives, most of it was outdated vehicles, trucks and boots. Lot of boots.

    • @WTF2BlueTiger
      @WTF2BlueTiger 2 роки тому +8

      Although certain goods (like trucks and some medical supplies) were almost entirely supplied by the allies to the USSR army, this notion that it would be a killing blow is incredibly optimistic. At the peak year of goods/GDP it still only accounted for roughly 5 % of the USSRs economy, this isn't remotely comparable to e.g US lend lease to the UK. Theres no chance they would get a truck shortage in either the short or longterm...
      Even the idea of pushing the gigantic soviet army to the Oder river was ambitious...

    • @derekhalcon8287
      @derekhalcon8287 2 роки тому +25

      @@gamingjamie9415 point b is fake

  • @arifcso6633
    @arifcso6633 2 роки тому +15

    This is actually really interesting and would make a great alternate ww3 scenario in video game or movies

  • @CactusJackIV
    @CactusJackIV 2 роки тому +20

    Keep up the great job, you can see all the hard work put into each video.

    • @amanda4285
      @amanda4285 2 роки тому

      What's your idea about my channel ?
      ua-cam.com/channels/-ZHNksu7UlZ2hiLIvyEw2Q.html

  • @mihalacheandrei926
    @mihalacheandrei926 2 роки тому +7

    The scene with the british drinking tea, germans with a beer near them American with dual wielding weapons a burger and the russians with vodka made me laugh out loud

  • @AresLeviathan
    @AresLeviathan 2 роки тому +7

    Can we just take a second to appreciate that even in the midst of battle, there's time to stop for a drink?

  • @pokefan-ix7sh
    @pokefan-ix7sh 2 роки тому +14

    Operation Unthinkable was the name given to two related possible future war plans by the British Chiefs of Staff against the Soviet Union in 1945. The plans were never approved nor implemented. The creation of the plans was ordered by British Prime Minister Winston Churchill in May 1945 and developed by the British Armed Forces' Joint Planning Staff in May 1945 at the end of World War II in Europe.
    One plan assumed a surprise attack on the Soviet forces stationed in Germany to "impose the will of the Western Allies" on the Soviets. "The will" was qualified as "a square deal for Poland", which probably meant enforcing the recently signed Yalta Agreement. The planners decided that without massive American help Britain would probably fail. The assessment, signed by the Chief of Army Staff on 9 June 1945, concluded: "It would be beyond our power to win a quick but limited success and we would be committed to a protracted war against heavy odds." The code name was now reused instead for a second plan, which was a defensive scenario in which the British were to defend against a Soviet drive towards the North Sea and the Atlantic following the withdrawal of the American forces from the Continent. At no time was either plan shared with the United States or anyone else. When the Labour Party came to power in the 1945 general election, it ignored the draft plan.
    The study became the first Cold War-era contingency plan for war with the Soviet Union. Both plans were highly secret and were not made public until 1998 - although a British spy for the Soviets, Guy Burgess, had passed on some details at the time.

  • @junedhussain6252
    @junedhussain6252 2 роки тому +45

    Thank you so much for your hard work Simple History. I think operation unthinkable would had been catastrophic and possibly even worse than world war 2. I don't think the world would want another war.

    • @junedhussain6252
      @junedhussain6252 2 роки тому

      The one thing that I liked about this video was the soldiers were having their popular food and drink. The British with their tea, the Germans with their beer, the Americans with their burgers and the Soviets with their Vodka.

    • @mjatriumxironreign8969
      @mjatriumxironreign8969 2 роки тому

      Ok

  • @nateyolo9827
    @nateyolo9827 Рік тому +4

    We need a movie and game of this

  • @cadelussenden5144
    @cadelussenden5144 2 роки тому +120

    The Soviets divisions were far smaller than the allied ones. Soviet rifle divisions were roughly 8 thousand men strong at full strength where as the allied ones sat around 17 or 18 thousand. Also note the allies had a boatload of tank battalions not part of tank divisions so that all allied divisions could count on tank support.

    • @erickdesendant6502
      @erickdesendant6502 2 роки тому +5

      Yeah because they have Britain France Germany USA Canada and Australia what will you expect to the top ten country ally vs a top 2 russia

    • @jamesquinney6686
      @jamesquinney6686 2 роки тому +5

      So the allies would have around 800,000 soldiers and the soviets would have over 2 million

    • @cadelussenden5144
      @cadelussenden5144 2 роки тому +16

      @@jamesquinney6686 The allies had millions of soldiers in the european theater with no shortage of manpower. The Soviets had more men and more tanks technically, but that means absolutly nothing considering the allies would obtain complete Air Supremacy fairly quickly. They also had far better established supply lines over the Soviet ones. Operation unthinkable also called for raising 300,000 or more German troops from POWs already taken.

    • @johnfrancis2215
      @johnfrancis2215 2 роки тому +10

      @@cadelussenden5144 wars always work out better on paper, especially ones that were never fought

    • @cadelussenden5144
      @cadelussenden5144 2 роки тому +7

      @@johnfrancis2215 thats not necessarily true. That works both ways. Often times, for example poland did wargames recently before the ukriane invasion and they concluded they would last less than 20 days vs the Russian military. We now know for a fact they way over estimated the Russians. But I do get where you are coming from.

  • @Crackshotsteph
    @Crackshotsteph 2 роки тому +14

    Patton would have agreed with Churchill's plan.

  • @justafrogwithahat355
    @justafrogwithahat355 2 роки тому +12

    3:55 CAPTAIN PRICE?!

  • @somersetdc
    @somersetdc 2 роки тому +5

    Stalin thought of doing the same thing. When his generals proposed that he continue the war into Western Europe, Stalin said about the hundreds of millions of Europeans, "Who will feed them?"

  • @pjthehomelessmage
    @pjthehomelessmage 2 роки тому +24

    This would have been an interesting timeline. Whether it would have been better or worse almost impossible to know.

  • @kibanisili8702
    @kibanisili8702 2 роки тому +9

    Churchill was insane, that's it

  • @arober9758
    @arober9758 2 роки тому +7

    Well greatly done fellows!! The animation has changed a lot sinceI first started watching back in 2019. I love it. Keep up the good work.

    • @amanda4285
      @amanda4285 2 роки тому

      What's your idea about my channel ?
      ua-cam.com/channels/-ZHNksu7UlZ2hiLIvyEw2Q.html

  • @GG-ut9ms
    @GG-ut9ms 7 місяців тому +8

    Churchill thinking he wasn’t a “lesser of two evils” is hilarious. He was just a drunk English Warhawk jealous that the USSR could liberate what the English couldn’t.

    • @jessesimmons4503
      @jessesimmons4503 7 місяців тому +1

      Naziism is authoritarianism but so is communism.

    • @matushka__
      @matushka__ 7 місяців тому

      Lmao sit down vatnik.

  • @jihadpromax3520
    @jihadpromax3520 2 роки тому +7

    I like the fact that the brits and russians are sipping vodka and tea during the battle

  • @LarryPhischman
    @LarryPhischman 2 роки тому +53

    Operation Unthinkable would have succeeded. Declassified war times documents leaked after the Soviet Union voted itself out of existence show that Stalin started shipping his forces to staging areas in the Russian Far East as soon as Germany surrendered. By the time Unthinkable would have taken place, there were just enough Soviet forces left in Eastern Europe to maintain order, but not hold it. And Stalin had most of those forces up against the western frontier, where the western allies could see them.
    Had Unthinkable taken place, American, British, French, German, and probably Italian forces would have smashed through Soviet lines in a few days, and found only mild resistance all the way to the former Polish-Soviet border. It would have taken weeks for Stalin to get his army back into Europe, and by then it would be too late.

    • @michaelmerrell8540
      @michaelmerrell8540 2 роки тому +16

      That's assuming they didn't notice the preparations for the attack and halt the redeployment.

    • @Tespri
      @Tespri 2 роки тому +2

      They really missed opportunity to save mankind from Communism and Russia. Now that nukes exists were all going to be extinct at one point thanks to those two.

    • @Ritz1256
      @Ritz1256 2 роки тому +8

      That is, if the Soviets totally didn't expect it to happen

    • @dogrog5006
      @dogrog5006 2 роки тому +5

      Werent the redeployment of troops a part of alied agrement concerning war with Japan ?

    • @nickb3164
      @nickb3164 2 роки тому +13

      what do you mean voted itself out of existence? most soviets voted to keep the union together

  • @4realm8rusirius
    @4realm8rusirius 2 роки тому +39

    Imagine they actually went with the plan

    • @tiagomonteiro130
      @tiagomonteiro130 2 роки тому +42

      The world would be a better place

    • @aleksander_h6928
      @aleksander_h6928 2 роки тому +29

      The Warsaw pact would extend from Vladivostok to Lisbon....

    • @tiagomonteiro130
      @tiagomonteiro130 2 роки тому +21

      @@aleksander_h6928 What warsaw pact lmao that didn't even exist at that time

    • @amirpourghoureiyan1637
      @amirpourghoureiyan1637 2 роки тому +2

      there would be no deterrence.

    • @Astromontana
      @Astromontana 2 роки тому +18

      I imagine at least 1/4 of us wouldn't exist. Think about all the generations of families completely wiped out in WW1 and WW2.

  • @Hans140
    @Hans140 2 роки тому +2

    3:34 simple history being funny is something I was not expecting nor prepared for, but good god I love it

  • @sirduffbeer4202
    @sirduffbeer4202 2 роки тому +41

    You can’t compare division numbers as a comparison of numbers. Soviet divisions were both smaller and under manned with many of them less half their theoretical strength

    • @BladePocok
      @BladePocok 2 роки тому +2

      But did the Western Allies consider that?

    • @andershargrave7246
      @andershargrave7246 2 роки тому

      I think it's comparsible because of level of morale and military experience in soviet troops

    • @jackster2568
      @jackster2568 2 роки тому

      @@andershargrave7246 you're "I think" is the same as " I just want my guys to win, and this totally immeasurable metric confirms that pound for pound my side was better"

    • @andershargrave7246
      @andershargrave7246 2 роки тому +1

      @@jackster2568 Totally immerasurable - maybe.
      As i said it is my personal opinion. The conversation was about comparsing of divisions's powers. And i find questionable such methods of rating power

    • @sirduffbeer4202
      @sirduffbeer4202 2 роки тому +2

      @@BladePocok I agree the planners would have but Simple History didn’t. At 8:30 they list the number of allied (103) vs soviet (264) division and concluded that they were outnumbered by a factor of 2.5. Which would not have been the case

  • @skeng5073
    @skeng5073 2 роки тому +26

    Can we appreciate the fact that in 3:34, they took the time to animate a British soldier sipping tea, a German soldier with a glass of beer and an American soldier with multiple bronze stars and a rocket launcher while wielding SMGs on both his hands

  • @buzzman3200
    @buzzman3200 2 роки тому +3

    The one omission I can think of is whether the US atomic weapons would have tipped the balance, but these hadn't yet been used when Operation Unthinkable was written

  • @seedbutu9605
    @seedbutu9605 2 роки тому +1

    The animation is becoming better every video keep it up a Good job 👍

  • @billybill1272
    @billybill1272 2 роки тому +45

    It’s worth noting that Soviet divisions were often 1/3 the size as their western counterparts, hence the manpower imbalance was not largely in favor of the soviets.

    • @EA-my1bx
      @EA-my1bx 2 роки тому

      It was soviet army was 10mil and allied forces 3.5mil approximately

    • @utkarshchoudhary3870
      @utkarshchoudhary3870 2 роки тому +13

      @@EA-my1bx Deployment on the front is different to the Total size.

    • @EA-my1bx
      @EA-my1bx 2 роки тому +1

      @@utkarshchoudhary3870 true but still soviet ground forces were stronger

    • @AbyssWatcher745
      @AbyssWatcher745 2 роки тому +9

      @@EA-my1bx The Allies would have air superiority though

    • @utkarshchoudhary3870
      @utkarshchoudhary3870 2 роки тому

      @@EA-my1bx Yes.

  • @the.parks.of.no.return
    @the.parks.of.no.return 2 роки тому +3

    One point
    Russia ceased to exist in 1917, it became the soviet union. Russia came back into being in 1991

  • @commisarmichael8097
    @commisarmichael8097 2 роки тому +5

    2:00 didn't Churchill and Roosevelt sold Poland in Yalta Conference?

  • @theunitedkingdom5202
    @theunitedkingdom5202 Рік тому +2

    1:05 "Choosing the lesser lf 2 evils is still choosing the side of evil."

  • @alecbowman7738
    @alecbowman7738 2 роки тому +27

    Could you imagine how the Germans would’ve felt about this?

    • @nrw64
      @nrw64 2 роки тому +21

      They either didn't feel like it anymore or would be out for revenge. Would also probably give some would consider something like treason. In Germany nobody wanted war anymore.
      In addition, Germany lay in rubble and ashes. They would probably feel more used or perhaps even resist. Everything possible. Perhaps they would have made conditions such as getting the German eastern territories back from Poland and reversing Stalin's westward shift.
      The Germans hated the Soviets for everything they did and what they are and especially their tyrant Stalin, but they didn't want any more war either. Nor were they friendly to the Allies. The Allies did not ingratiate themselves with the targeted bombing of the German civilian population.
      In addition, Germany was not "denazified" so there could still be werewolf members.
      That this operation could have succeeded was very doubtful. The operation is not called "unthinkable" for nothing

    • @3baxcb
      @3baxcb 2 роки тому

      @@nrw64 Not to mention that the German Army was a shadow of what it was at the height of WWII. They were relying on underage recruits and even WWI veterans and most of their armoured vehicles, tanks, planes, bombers and such were destroyed or heavily damaged. They were completely outmatched and rather out of date as a army by 1945. The Red Army would have known that and simply commit maneuvers on those forces and possibly outflank whatever stronger forces they could be engaged against.

  • @dblundz
    @dblundz 2 роки тому +11

    The American 😂👌🏻 3:48

  • @supergriz4673
    @supergriz4673 2 роки тому +7

    In the thumbnail one of the guns is supposed to be a PPD 40 but its a Suomi m/31
    (It's a minor mistake but I just wanted to point it out)

  • @That0Homeless0Guy
    @That0Homeless0Guy 2 роки тому +2

    I love that tje attitude wasn't that we wouldn't win but that it would take too long.

  • @tj-co9go
    @tj-co9go 2 роки тому +77

    Was Operation Unthinkable truly planned to be realized, or was it just one possible scenario they would have prepared for? I would imagine an attack from the Soviet side would have been likely at the time too

    • @mestupkid211986
      @mestupkid211986 2 роки тому

      There were some documents that stated Stalin was preparing to "save" Europe.

    • @suchlimk
      @suchlimk 2 роки тому

      Yes

    • @JWSoul
      @JWSoul 2 роки тому

      100 percent likely the Soviets would attack.

    • @bullmoosevelt4495
      @bullmoosevelt4495 2 роки тому

      It was likely just a war plan they had drafted but didn’t intend to execute unless properly justified. Prior to World War 2, the United States had arranged a collection of various contingency war plans in case it went to war with any of the world powers or regional threats including Allies. Look up the Color-coded War Plans.

    • @БудаМарактаев
      @БудаМарактаев 2 роки тому

      У американцев подобных планов было хоть жопой жуй. И все они предполагали превратить ссср в радиоактивный пепел Вот уж действительно, демократично.

  • @raymondyee2008
    @raymondyee2008 2 роки тому +13

    They needed more of this in PC war games. Especially “what if” scenarios.

  • @julesbenedictcatalan4904
    @julesbenedictcatalan4904 2 роки тому +6

    6:45 Obstacles that defeated both Hitler and Napoelon's army
    *Sad King Charles XII noises*

  • @Vincentovich89
    @Vincentovich89 2 роки тому +64

    I always thought that the US had the Atomic Bomb 4 full years before the Soviets, so how did they fail to use this as the decisive leverage needed to force Stalin to pull back from Eastern Europe?

    • @imrankh68
      @imrankh68 2 роки тому +3

      Me too. I always wondered 🤔

    • @justnoobtoo6352
      @justnoobtoo6352 2 роки тому +37

      Probably the cost of being seen as a genocidal imperialist country especially after Nagasaki and Hiroshima wouldn't have been to good and then theres successfully deploying the bomb

    • @nogisonoko5409
      @nogisonoko5409 2 роки тому +1

      Atomic bombs was a luxury in 1945, it have few of them to be use against massive Soviet armed forces.Even if it did use against the Soviets, it will drastically motivate the Soviets to fight to the end as Western Allies really want to wipe out the Soviets as a whole.

    • @亲爱的爸爸
      @亲爱的爸爸 2 роки тому

      atom bomb is paper tiger, because war is about realizing economy and political struggle objective.

    • @bolshoefeodor6536
      @bolshoefeodor6536 2 роки тому

      The Russians would have developed the bomb soon after. The retaliation of the supposedly-surrendered Soviets would have left Britain and France a radioactive wasteland.