Vertical Axis Wind Turbines - IN 60 SECONDS

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 19 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 60

  • @Swallabat
    @Swallabat 6 років тому +61

    I would have liked an idea of how much less efficient they are, and an insight into why that is. Thanks though, it's a good intro.

    • @jukkatakamaa7274
      @jukkatakamaa7274 5 років тому +3

      Only VAWTs can brake the Betz limit...by 12% say the scientists.

    • @davidmuniz5307
      @davidmuniz5307 4 роки тому +6

      Daerrius designs can reach 40% efficiency. Modern HAWTs can reach 50%. So max efficiency difference is 10%

  • @Juanjose-tm4qp
    @Juanjose-tm4qp 4 роки тому +8

    ¿Is it true that these Vertical Axis Wind Turbines are more stable in high speed winds than horizontal turbines and safer for animals like birds and bats?

  • @benrasmussen9878
    @benrasmussen9878 4 роки тому +6

    If reliability is the problem, can you be more specific? Is it a common condition due to the design?

  • @Soothsayer210
    @Soothsayer210 4 роки тому +7

    Do you think VAWT would be better solution on a Solar Power Electric boat since they do not cast much shadow over the solar panels? I was thinking of a better solution for charging the battery banks in the night by using Wind Power to supplement the solar power.

  • @hamobilelgv3227
    @hamobilelgv3227 4 роки тому +4

    Pardon for stupid question. But why not putting the VAWT axis horizontal ??

  • @lucindahudson8483
    @lucindahudson8483 6 років тому +9

    My understanding is that they are quite good for off grid projects and also smaller; is this correct?

    • @DOBAcademy
      @DOBAcademy  6 років тому +5

      That is correct! VAWTS are also very appropriate for DYI projects.

    • @jukkatakamaa7274
      @jukkatakamaa7274 5 років тому

      No they can be developed to produce over 2 GW in a high wind.

    • @geraldzucawish2586
      @geraldzucawish2586 4 роки тому

      The question is what are willing to pay for 10 KWh VAWT? Do you want to use to replace wood for heating ? Or do you want a small 1kwh for ornamental purpose or for areating a pond ican custom build for a specific need depending on what you are willing to pay

  • @littlesquirrel777
    @littlesquirrel777 6 років тому +7

    Great video on Wind Turbines, thank you.

  • @russellknight6418
    @russellknight6418 2 роки тому +1

    Is it feasible to shield the side of the turbine that is moving against the wind direction with a cover that deflects the wind to reduce the drag on that side

    • @shawng5799
      @shawng5799 2 роки тому

      Looks like that is what Vodafone have just done with theirs but they have tipped it on its side, so must be computer controlled to stay in the wind.

  • @samuelyesudass6094
    @samuelyesudass6094 2 роки тому

    How big area and height is needed to go for a 5 to 10KW vertical wind energy? Where to get assistant?

  • @harshthummar9179
    @harshthummar9179 Рік тому

    Which software use for this type of video

  • @scienceraven1200
    @scienceraven1200 4 роки тому +7

    They can't be less reliable, they have only 2 ball bearings, whereas the yawt version has more moving parts.

    • @andrewprahst
      @andrewprahst 4 роки тому +3

      Yeh, I wonder how exactly they fail

  • @upscalelures
    @upscalelures 6 років тому +3

    How are they less efficient?

    • @PfennigerDavid
      @PfennigerDavid 5 років тому +7

      Because 1 of the 3 vertical blades slows the turbine all the time when it's rotating back against the wind direction

    • @jukkatakamaa7274
      @jukkatakamaa7274 5 років тому +2

      @@PfennigerDavid 2 blade is the answer to this.

  • @SukacitaYeremia
    @SukacitaYeremia 6 років тому +3

    They use lift? Cool, but still don't really get it. But this has been the closest I get to understanding VAWTs. Thanks Man

    • @karlschveg7848
      @karlschveg7848 5 років тому

      They use lift to put less friction on the motor and the bearings im assuming

  •  6 років тому +2

    Why less reliable?

    • @jukkatakamaa7274
      @jukkatakamaa7274 5 років тому +2

      This is a myth.

    • @Gimmeafukinbre
      @Gimmeafukinbre 4 роки тому

      Especially with the slipstream omni directional design. The angle of the blades creates lift but the air also slides through and up the blades as well. They're more compact and better in lower winds . Also safer. The oil industry is why they have not taken off yet.

  • @shexdensmore
    @shexdensmore 6 років тому +7

    How are VAWT's less efficient?

    • @DOBAcademy
      @DOBAcademy  6 років тому +10

      Good question! This is due to the fact that "traditional" wind turbines face the wind and in that sense are able to catch much more of the energy potential. All blades are fully driven by the wind at the same time, while in VAWTs this is not the case.

  • @jaromejacksan6934
    @jaromejacksan6934 5 років тому

    My works too. Used Avasva handbooks and build it with no problems.

  • @markjmaxwell9819
    @markjmaxwell9819 2 роки тому +1

    Both have advantages and disadvantages..
    The straight blade vertical designs are starting to become popular.
    Aluminium blades should have replaced fibreglass years ago.

    • @waynecummings5021
      @waynecummings5021 2 роки тому

      Agree. Or stainless steel as that stuff is so simple to manufacturer and unlike aluminium it doesn't corrode meaning less drag.

    • @DOBAcademy
      @DOBAcademy  2 роки тому

      We're actually looking into this and might do a video on it in the future.

  • @mullajahangirahmed1772
    @mullajahangirahmed1772 4 роки тому

    Give Details of the unit and cost,

  • @adityadubey2698
    @adityadubey2698 4 роки тому +1

    Thanks a ton man.

  • @JasonCarmichael
    @JasonCarmichael 5 років тому +1

    How can it be still in development? The Persians used it 3000 years ago. What is there to develop?

  • @dougwoolery998
    @dougwoolery998 5 років тому

    What kind of mechanism....... ya

  • @bharathkumararaveeti4685
    @bharathkumararaveeti4685 4 роки тому

    How vawt works

  • @ronidude
    @ronidude 6 років тому

    thanks!

  • @SWOBIZ
    @SWOBIZ 5 років тому +1

    Like all wind turbines, these have erratic, fluctuating output dependent on the wind which will cause dangerous brown outs and black outs. Wind is only viable if you include a 100% back-up power supply using reliable generation, typically fossil fuels or nuclear.

    • @nordvoda
      @nordvoda 5 років тому

      движение воды в реках и морях Вам подойдёт?

    • @andriusst
      @andriusst 5 років тому +4

      Time to stop considering fossil and nuclear as an option. A well matched power storage/buffer can do the job just as well.

    • @My-Opinion-Doesnt-Matter
      @My-Opinion-Doesnt-Matter 5 років тому +1

      Or hydro.

    • @horizontaltwo0841
      @horizontaltwo0841 4 роки тому +4

      @@andriusst - nuclear power is a clean replacement for fossil fuels though.

  • @adhvik8572
    @adhvik8572 2 роки тому

    Nice

  • @saminsiddiquee2059
    @saminsiddiquee2059 5 років тому

    Efficiency has nothing to do with anything. The main thing is capacity utilisation

  • @johnwinnerdz1
    @johnwinnerdz1 6 років тому

    But I have two potential employees to start with .

  • @birbalsingh1870
    @birbalsingh1870 4 роки тому

    Do you have any office in India send me address

  • @sandipanbhandari4948
    @sandipanbhandari4948 6 років тому +1

    😍

  • @hollya9381
    @hollya9381 Рік тому

    i LOL’D XD