Ventilation Perfusion (VQ) Mismatch Explained Clearly

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 291

  • @jennifertorresyee7887
    @jennifertorresyee7887 9 років тому +96

    best 14 minutes ever spent! your video summarized in 14 minutes what 2 hrs of ventilation lectures didn't at my school... THANK YOU!!!

    • @Medcram
      @Medcram  9 років тому +2

      +Jennifer Torres Glad the video was helpful- thanks for the feedback!

  • @jennygonzalez1281
    @jennygonzalez1281 9 років тому +21

    I'm studying to take my Step one next month and never understood this, after a youtube search on V-Q mismatch I stumbled upon this, thank you so much! It's so clear now, better late than never! :)

    • @Medcram
      @Medcram  9 років тому +2

      Jenny Gonzalez Glad we were able to clear up VQ mismatch for you- thanks for the feedback

  • @buyornot543
    @buyornot543 8 років тому +27

    wow, compared to the PhD teaching at my medschool............
    this is pure gold.

  • @shakhirrt5188
    @shakhirrt5188 8 років тому +17

    You got a very rare talent that many people dont have..thanks a lot...

  • @RavishingSailor
    @RavishingSailor 7 років тому +5

    Thank you so much for all your videos.
    I'm in my third month as a first year pulmonary/CC fellow and have been using your videos to reinforce concepts that during residency I found very confusing. You have such a talent.
    Thank you

  • @johnmichael5135
    @johnmichael5135 9 років тому +4

    ur lectures go hand in hand with your picture - you explain so clearly that it is like you are spoonfeeding us the exam answers :) so glad to be subscribed.

  • @amandanifong7903
    @amandanifong7903 4 роки тому +1

    Came here to grasp it for nursing school... And DANG. This was fantastic! Exactly what I needed. Thank you!

  • @lobarita
    @lobarita 3 роки тому +3

    ICU nurse here: hard to keep up with, but still very helpful. Thank you guys.

  • @Cypher1210
    @Cypher1210 8 років тому +1

    You are a god! Pulmonary Physiology exam coming up & this explained it so much better than my professors rambling!

  • @emilysummer1373
    @emilysummer1373 7 років тому +1

    I have stage IV COPD with VQ mismatch and PH and nobody ever explained what this meant to me. Thank you!! Now I realize why I must keep 02 on always and monitor with pulse oximeter.

  • @gautammure
    @gautammure 3 роки тому

    Incredible illustration, Doctor. Bravo! The best I have ever seen. Crisp, eloquent and to the T.

  • @artiepie
    @artiepie 11 років тому

    I am a pulmonary hypertension patient and have to have a double lung transplant. This lecture really helped me understand what the docs are talking about when they say my pressures are at certain levels. Thank you

  • @jasmac84
    @jasmac84 9 років тому +3

    your lectures are great I finally understand so easy to follow... I have been to several lectures on VQ mismatch over the years and could not get my head around it... I listen to your lecture and bang I finally understand it. I'm glad our Uni lecturer suggested to watch your videos..

    • @Medcram
      @Medcram  9 років тому

      Jason MacAskill Thanks for the feedback- glad the video helped clear things up

  • @ruannelynch9912
    @ruannelynch9912 9 років тому

    After reading over the same 3 paragraphs about 4 times in my text book, i bounced up this you tube explanation and i can finally read on. Thank you very much.

    • @Medcram
      @Medcram  9 років тому

      Ruanne Lynch Good to hear the video made the textbook more readable- thanks for the comment

  • @charlotteportzen3337
    @charlotteportzen3337 11 років тому +1

    You are helping me get through nursing school. Thank you so much for these videos.

  • @ashmano23
    @ashmano23 7 років тому +2

    Hallelujah !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! May God bless you million times million. I completely understood the concept, I was so lost before i watched this video. :') Thank you

  • @ischupak6767
    @ischupak6767 8 років тому

    Legend. If only you were my lecturer! So clear & easy to understand! THANKS A MILLION!!!

  • @jae89latina
    @jae89latina 11 років тому +1

    Blew my mind how simply it was explained! Loved the illistrations

  • @jennigiatroudakis4240
    @jennigiatroudakis4240 8 років тому +6

    Very helpful! But one suggestion: Khan's professors are great at using different colors to help organize paths ways or thought. I would have appreciated that especially in the beginning of the video.

  • @uzairjavaid219
    @uzairjavaid219 9 років тому

    Way of your explanation is matchless... A big applause for you

  • @xinfam0usxplayax
    @xinfam0usxplayax 5 років тому +2

    Wow. ICU presentation today covering MOA hypoxemia. This was the only thing i had trouble explaining. Thank you!!

  • @myprettygirl91
    @myprettygirl91 5 років тому +2

    this is absolutely amazing. I've been trying to understand this concept for literally hours. i get ittttt

    • @Medcram
      @Medcram  5 років тому

      Thank you for watching!

  • @gonzojed1
    @gonzojed1 8 років тому +6

    Straight forward, concise and in layman's terms. Very well done, thank you for your time and effort.

  • @captainvdog6871
    @captainvdog6871 4 роки тому +1

    Dude! You are a rockstar at explanations!!

  • @singleswomen3929
    @singleswomen3929 5 років тому +1

    Doc am grateful for all your materials.have learnt a lot
    Anaesthestist resident in Nigeria

  • @hyrum_abiff4325
    @hyrum_abiff4325 4 роки тому +1

    Love the analogy of ' air goes in and out and blood goes round and round' - this is what I jokingly tell people my bachelor of paramedical science taught me. However, essentially keeping a VR and HR going is one very good end goal for treating acute patients, generally speaking. I'm sure you know where I am coming from. Peace

  • @rburdman87
    @rburdman87 10 років тому

    I was just diagnosed with this today and my head was spinning. Thanks for an easy to understand tutorial.

    • @paydenaronson524
      @paydenaronson524 9 років тому

      You can not be diagnosed with v/q mismatch... You can be diagnosed with pneumonia or asthma or anything else but not v/q mismatch...

    • @rburdman87
      @rburdman87 9 років тому

      Payden Aronson Interesting...I have documentation stating VQ mismatch from a Cardiologist and a pulmonary team. Had 2 right heart cats done and one was a stress cath ... I am not contradicting you, I don't know enough about it to say who is correct.

  • @fatboy117
    @fatboy117 7 років тому +1

    Finally a well explain concise video with ways to apply this concept

  • @vinnyfrancio23
    @vinnyfrancio23 7 років тому +1

    Very good explanation of quite difficult topics for the USMLE step 1. Thank you Sir.

  • @Twelvesteps
    @Twelvesteps 11 років тому

    Thank you for helping me on my National Respiratory Therapist exam.

  • @bluesapphire471
    @bluesapphire471 11 років тому

    Words cannot describe how grateful I am for this video! Dr. Seheult did an EXCELLENT job in breaking down the concepts. I am clearly able to grasp the concepts!!

  • @KBearRawrRawr
    @KBearRawrRawr 11 років тому

    This is a really thorough and clear concise explanation of V/Q mismatch thank you so much!

  • @hillcat2008
    @hillcat2008 11 років тому +1

    Love this series! I may pass this exam after all!

  • @drbirendrakishorenayak1037
    @drbirendrakishorenayak1037 7 років тому +1

    Excellent for the biggner and really very talented explanation which makes easier

  • @padersam2012
    @padersam2012 10 років тому +3

    thank you for such a clear explanation of V/Q mismatch

  • @natalielouise2865
    @natalielouise2865 11 років тому

    Absolutely awesome! Why can't clinicians just explain it like this? Thank you ever so much for making study easier

  • @Medcram
    @Medcram  8 років тому +6

    See the whole series at www.medcram.com along with other top quality videos including reviews in pulmonary, cardiology, infectious disease, and hematology!

  • @simonbarry6582
    @simonbarry6582 9 років тому

    Very good tutorial, very well explained. One thing you do that is soo--o-o often done badly in medical tutorials/discussions is that you have made sure the basic terminology and concepts are explained along the way.
    Btw this video also taught me PE fundamentals better than anything I've read on PE!

    • @Medcram
      @Medcram  9 років тому

      +Simon Barry Good to hear- glad this helped in your understanding, and thank you for your topic suggestion. We look at all topic suggestions like yours in planning for new videos

  • @hotfoot214
    @hotfoot214 11 років тому

    DR you are a genius.i know understand hypoxema better than after reading all those stuffy texts.thank you

  • @prantikachakraborty7330
    @prantikachakraborty7330 8 років тому

    you are unique at making difficult concept easier..god bless you

  • @MijntjeV
    @MijntjeV 12 років тому +1

    Wauw, this is soooo incredibly helpful! My test is tomorrow and I have higher hopes now haha! Thanks a lot!! X

  • @Hernandez877
    @Hernandez877 8 років тому +5

    Thank you so much. My professor didnt even let me know that Q was perfusion

  • @jennaisrael7091
    @jennaisrael7091 9 років тому +2

    Very Helpful!! I would love to you go through a few more examples of pathology that lead to V/Q mismatch for example when V/Q is low like in bronchospasm or something like COPD/Asthma that affects both lungs in their entirety.

    • @Medcram
      @Medcram  9 років тому

      +Jenna Israel Thanks for the comment and suggestion!

  • @cocokrisp8967
    @cocokrisp8967 7 років тому +1

    Fabulous! great visuals and clear instruction!

  • @itsssmenil7287
    @itsssmenil7287 5 років тому +2

    thank you! very informative!Please make a video also for respiratory failure.

  • @Shaf2010
    @Shaf2010 10 років тому +1

    Thank you so much.For the first time,I can say that I understand Hypoxemia.

  • @skizaftis
    @skizaftis 7 років тому +1

    Fantastic explanation. You are doing great job!

  • @elizabethallen3751
    @elizabethallen3751 10 років тому +1

    These have been great, thanks for posting. Everything is clearer now!

  • @aldys2005
    @aldys2005 10 років тому

    You have a great way of teaching. Simple and precise! Thank you!

  • @JelliBaby780
    @JelliBaby780 9 років тому +2

    Lifesaver please continue doing this!!!!

    • @Medcram
      @Medcram  9 років тому

      +JelliBaby780 Thanks! More videos coming soon

  • @laryssablunt8299
    @laryssablunt8299 8 років тому +1

    GREAT demo! Clear and informative!

  • @Drexelle
    @Drexelle 11 років тому

    Great video! Now (just to tie it all in) I gotta go find the one where you describe and explain "Shunt". I am a Trauma/Burn ICU RN who loves to understand the rationale behind what we do. Thank you!

  • @hasanabad9141
    @hasanabad9141 8 років тому +5

    Thank you for your video. I just have one question regarding pneumonia and pulmonary edema, i.e. In those states, is it that you have increased fluid in the alveoli resulting in impaired ventilation but normal perfusion, creating an intrapulmonary shunt? So why would supplemental oxygen improve oxygen status in this case? Thank you in advance.

  • @cnmacias1
    @cnmacias1 11 років тому

    You explained things wonderfully! Thank you for making this topic simpler for me.

  • @sanj5026
    @sanj5026 11 років тому

    Roger. Thank you for all the videos. Please keep them coming!! Very helpful for a respiratory therapist student that's just entering his/her clinical practice :D

  • @kasahunbentimerga3006
    @kasahunbentimerga3006 7 років тому +2

    You are my favorite, as usual!

  • @cherie-chufeiwong2212
    @cherie-chufeiwong2212 8 років тому

    @12:35 You said that blood will go from high V/Q to low V/Q area. But I think it should be opposite. Decreasing ventilation and increasing perfusion will cause the terminal arterioles constrict and redirect blood to the respiratory area where PO2 is high. Therefore, the blood should go from low V/Q area to high V/Q area.

    • @Medcram
      @Medcram  8 років тому

      +Shirley King Thanks for commenting. What I was trying to communicate was that when there is a physicial obstruction in the pulmonary artery, this is going to cause blood to go from that area to anywhere else it can. Because of this it will cause an area of low perfusion to the affected area (high V/Q) and an area of high perfusion to everywhere esle (low V/Q).

  • @leiying
    @leiying 8 років тому +3

    Great explanation!
    Just need some clarification. I was taught that:
    - in lobar pneumonia, a portion of the lung has gunk in it and therefore is effectively a partial shunt (for that part of the lung) - V/Q ratio is very low
    - in pulmonary embolism, a portion of the lung cannot not be perfused and therefore is effectively in dead space ventilation (for that part of the lung) - V/Q ratio is very high
    SO when you say breathing 100% oxygen will correct a decreased arterial PO2 caused by V/Q mismatch but NOT shunt, are you referring to the shunt as being a very large shunt that blocks off an entire lung like widespread "white out" pneumonia?
    Is there a gradient for when V/Q mismatch becomes a complete shunt or complete dead space when the V/Q ratio reaches extremes?

    • @rjt6765
      @rjt6765 8 років тому +1

      I believe the principle he is speaking to is blood flow through a shunt, either from a pneumonia (blocked alveoli with mucus) or physiologic (like deoxygenated blood from the lung parenchyma) will not be exposed to oxygen at all (very low V/no change in Q). Increasing the PiO2 will have no effect on shunted blood because it is never within diffusion distance of blood. Hope this helps.

  • @danielalexander8643
    @danielalexander8643 11 років тому

    very good explanation.. V/Q mismatch isn't difficult again with this lecture..

  • @7r1n3santiago
    @7r1n3santiago 10 років тому

    great video and easy to understand!
    please keep posting

  • @timhardcastle5428
    @timhardcastle5428 11 років тому +1

    Resp test next wednesday.......thank you from New Zealand :)

  • @simonl6151
    @simonl6151 11 років тому

    Very helpful thank you! Luckily I found this video. Have physiology test tomorrow :)

  • @pallavirao4127
    @pallavirao4127 5 років тому +1

    Beautifully explained.. Thank you

  • @AlexTarazona
    @AlexTarazona 10 років тому

    you did a better job than my patho teacher

  • @judochopthefed
    @judochopthefed 6 років тому

    My understanding of V/Q in the different Lung Zones. where the alveoli get smaller as its gets to the lower zones of the lungs are high V/ Q since the alveoli are smaller and easier to ventilate and perfuse but in the higher zones have larger alveoli has less V/Q since the alveoli are larger in the higher zones of the lungs. Your video showed me a total opposite of what I understand or think I remember with respect the V/Q in the Alveoli in the different Lung Zones.

  • @kristinruttan5451
    @kristinruttan5451 12 років тому

    great explanation! this made V/Q very easy to understand. thank you!

  • @imanmaryam2358
    @imanmaryam2358 6 років тому

    Can someone tell me why at the 8:07 it says that the saturation at the upper part is98% because it has high V and low Q? i mean what’s the relation btwn saturation and the VQ?help meee

  • @rody2022
    @rody2022 10 років тому

    Thank you so much for your clear explanation. I finally understand V/Q balance and imbalance, yay!

    • @Medcram
      @Medcram  10 років тому

      Roddy Gee Good to hear- Thanks for the comment!

  • @DanielWilliamHancock
    @DanielWilliamHancock 12 років тому

    Thanks, you made it very simple, my lecture was shocking in comparison

  • @katyaa7865
    @katyaa7865 10 років тому

    Great video has made it all a bit clearer!

  • @Mregmee
    @Mregmee 9 років тому +1

    Excellent video, very helpful

    • @Medcram
      @Medcram  9 років тому

      Manoj Regmi Thank you for the comment

  • @marygraham8120
    @marygraham8120 10 років тому +1

    @Tye, Aa refers to alveolar-arterial gradient and the concentration of oxygen of both areas.

  • @maveille
    @maveille 10 років тому

    Extremely helpful and concise. Thank you very much!

  • @Medcram
    @Medcram  12 років тому

    Glad it was helpful - thanks.

  • @chrisjauregui7308
    @chrisjauregui7308 10 років тому

    Great material, simple to understand.. thank you

    • @Medcram
      @Medcram  10 років тому

      Chris Jauregui Thank you- glad it was helpful

  • @lutfinurfarid9176
    @lutfinurfarid9176 10 років тому

    Very helpful, the explanation is very clear. Thanks!

  • @rakeshkiru1232
    @rakeshkiru1232 10 років тому +1

    firstly thanks so much for such a nice video . just one question is there chance of V/Q mismatch in case of hemothorax ?

  • @nicollepicton3208
    @nicollepicton3208 Рік тому

    Thank you! This is super helpful.

  • @1joseoliveira
    @1joseoliveira 8 років тому

    Why does VQ mismatch apply in Pulmonary Emboli? If there isn't any blood flow to that section of the lung shouldn't it be marked as dead space? Earlier in the video you said VQ mismatch works only for lung that is both perfused and ventilated (no matter the balance or mismatch between them).

  • @rizkiadrianhakim
    @rizkiadrianhakim 11 років тому

    Very clear explanation, thanks !

  • @Ghadeer88KSA
    @Ghadeer88KSA 10 років тому

    Thank you for the great and easy demonstration that was very interesting .. You made every's clear so far .. Thanks again

  • @IndyaBeerens
    @IndyaBeerens 4 роки тому

    from the bottom of my heart..... thank you

  • @kheeters
    @kheeters 8 років тому +1

    this was incredibly helpful!! one topic of interest (may already be covered, havent looked to see yet) differentiating PA02 from Pa02 from percent saturation from Fi02, and the different pathologies impacting all of these values (CO poisoning, altitude sickness, methemglobinemia, etc)

  • @jamalulazizi_MD
    @jamalulazizi_MD 11 років тому

    Great lecture. Would like a topic "cardiopulmonary exercise testing Explained Clearly. Tq

  • @funtimecruz
    @funtimecruz 11 років тому

    That was great. Thank you for your time in explaining.

  • @patppiot
    @patppiot 11 років тому

    Great! Any cardio lectures?

  • @dlong9562
    @dlong9562 10 років тому

    Made it very easy to follow and understand. Thanks

    • @Medcram
      @Medcram  10 років тому

      D Long thanks for the feedback- glad the video helped

  • @hornet011
    @hornet011 6 років тому

    One thing, V/Q mismatch doesn't necessary mean that part of lung has lower rate and other part higher than usual, it means that V/Q is different than normal for lungs. In pneumonia for example there aren't pulmonary segments with higher ratio. Only lower, and result is hypoxic blood.

  • @lemonsqueezycrafts6818
    @lemonsqueezycrafts6818 11 років тому

    Thank you very much for these lectures - really helps!!

  • @m33rebus
    @m33rebus 9 років тому

    Loving your videos, it made applications of medicine much more easier to understand! Also, just wondering, how does hypocapnia play out in the compensating of this situation?

  • @dropsdrops
    @dropsdrops 10 років тому

    Could you please explain why hypoventilation is not considered a type of a V/Q mismatch (low V/Q) if there is lowered alveolar ventilation (V) with normal perfusion (Q) in this condition ? (e.g. the alveolar ventilation 2,5 l/min and the perfusion 5 l/min -> V/Q = 0,5) This is the thing I cannot understand so i'd be grateful for some clarification on this matter. (sorry for posting this question under your hypoventilation lecture too :) )

  • @Nick191290
    @Nick191290 11 років тому

    Can i ask one question ? about the last slide, u mention that the shunting is not responds to 100% oxygen therapy. is this mean V/Q

  • @markprice9726
    @markprice9726 7 років тому

    Hi MedCram, I'm almost certain you get asked this all the time but what is the name of the whiteboard software are you running to create videos like this one?

  • @sofiauz
    @sofiauz 10 років тому

    great videos! would be interesting to watch EVLP related topics

    • @Medcram
      @Medcram  9 років тому

      sofia uz Thanks for the suggestion

  • @DaNamesScruffy
    @DaNamesScruffy 9 років тому

    Very good video, but would APO be another cause of V/Q mismatch

  • @yellobra6452
    @yellobra6452 6 років тому

    Wonderful explanation ++ Thank you very much!! (from France)

    • @Medcram
      @Medcram  6 років тому

      +Yellobra Merci beaucoup!

  • @mohamedbecool
    @mohamedbecool 7 років тому +1

    it's wonderful explanation

  • @farahzubaidy6116
    @farahzubaidy6116 7 років тому +1

    thank u so much for this great explanation

  • @samgosam9666
    @samgosam9666 7 років тому +1

    What software do you use for the drawings? I feel like they would come really handy when studying and being able to draw out diagrams, ect. Great video by the way. Thank you!

    • @Medcram
      @Medcram  7 років тому

      FrontCam and SmoothDraw. Thanks for the comment

  • @11zen45
    @11zen45 9 років тому

    Thank you sooooo much.
    Bless you.
    I appreciated your simple & clear explanation.

    • @Medcram
      @Medcram  9 років тому

      +Vanessa James Thank you for the feedback