The lower down you are in social class the more hard you have to be. It's savage at the bottom so you have to be more masculine to make it to the point you can live a soft life.
I follow you on tiktok and love your tales. I'm middle aged (45) and grew up lower class bur eventually started a career in IT that placed me in upper class spaces for most of my career. That changed my whole outlook on life. Keep up the great work
Because they are no longer warriors like they used to be. Almost all upper classes used to be military trained. Modern upper classes are technical clerical types.
I haven’t started the video yet but I’m sure it stems from the responsibilities each class of men would have. The lower class and middle class seem more masculine because the environment demands that
I wrote in an earlier post that good manners are not meant to be shown to those in a lower class. Nay, they were meant to keep powerful equals from feuding with each to the detriment of their social class. This is how anti-deuling laws came into existence.
Hi there, great video. Could you please make a video addressing the differences between how lower class and upper class women conduct themselves? Thanks!
Thats female nature in its raw and truest form (caveman wiring). They then shape themselves to how the world works when they get older and change their ideals.
I’m a woman and I found this video helpful both personally and professionally. I always knew I liked rough around the edges, blue-collar, masculine men because my daddy was one and I grew up around those men. I work in a corporate setting and I am not attracted to the men here. I am a pretty, quiet woman and I’ve had uncomfortable experiences rejecting the white collar, effeminate types. I want to move up in the world and realized I need to move differently. I appreciate the video!
It's because we live in a gynocentric world and "Social Class" is looked at in a somewhat feminine way. i.e. in the blue-collar world, the top in the class is the most resourceful person. At the gym the top of the class is the strongest person, in a battlefield the top of the class is the one who displays strategic leadership skills and controlled aggression.... it is relative to the environment. This sounds like a video for the creator to justify to himself (and others) why he thinks he is "soft". Sounds like being called soft is one of his insecurities. Anyway, this is an interesting topic, and he explained it well until he started rambling in the last half of the video.
My guess would be since they couldn't get chicks they studied more and indulged themselves into technology. Whereas the more alpha male type was swimming in the women. In general of course.
It is more so that upper class men are more educated and that education helps them understand they don't need to conform to the expectations that lower class men don't understand that they don't need to conform to.
Highly educated upper class men were not the athletic, popular types back in their youth so they make it up for it with intelligence, higher education and money, compared to the bad boy/alpha male types who got chicks because of their physical looks, soft skills and charisma on the flip side bad boys invest less time into higher education.
It’s instinctive for women to be attracted to the “primitive” hypermasculine part of man. It does not mean every woman will be attracted to that man because there are other factors that determine attraction beyond superficial red pill talking points like.
Intellect no, education yes. May not be the brightest but can spell and do basic math better than average (in America, where most of the country is illiterate)
@xavier.clb1 Thanks, would be nice when if you can dive into .. upper class Education vs Normal Education. From Kindergarten until varsity... any dynamics that stand out
Where does Donald Trump fit into this hypothesis? Very interesting discussion by the way. I saw an excellent interview with Chris Gardener (inspiration for Pursuit of Happiness) when asked about his struggle with breaking into financial services and if he believed it was to do with racism, he straight away said it was not, it was "placism" ie they couldn't figure where his "place" in the system belonged as he didn't go to certain schools etc...
The lower down you are in social class the more hard you have to be. It's savage at the bottom so you have to be more masculine to make it to the point you can live a soft life.
This goes for men and women
I follow you on tiktok and love your tales. I'm middle aged (45) and grew up lower class bur eventually started a career in IT that placed me in upper class spaces for most of my career. That changed my whole outlook on life. Keep up the great work
Thank you!
Because they are no longer warriors like they used to be. Almost all upper classes used to be military trained. Modern upper classes are technical clerical types.
There are still descendants of nobility and upper class warrior aristocracy
It's when both ends of the spectrum are integrated that the best results are achieved. Great topic tho.
In Japan the men dress very well, most of them have women we them. Masculinity varies from culture to culture. It’s about balance imo.
Cause we're not cavemen
😂
So sagging pants and sideways hats are manly in ya 30s and 40s?
is it only me or the hands of the presenter are moving waaaaaay waaaaay too much ??? 👀
..almost feminine like
As someone who grew up in section 8 housing, this feels like therapy
Spot on on the lack of travelling.
I haven’t started the video yet but I’m sure it stems from the responsibilities each class of men would have. The lower class and middle class seem more masculine because the environment demands that
I wrote in an earlier post that good manners are not meant to be shown to those in a lower class. Nay, they were meant to keep powerful equals from feuding with each to the detriment of their social class. This is how anti-deuling laws came into existence.
Hi there, great video. Could you please make a video addressing the differences between how lower class and upper class women conduct themselves?
Thanks!
I haven't seen many feminine high value men.
Neither have I... My Fraternity Brothers are very successful. Buddy would not fit in at all...
There a quite a few things in here that need to be addressed that you have overlooked. I will be addressing these issues in a video with 24 hrs.
Good video. It also revolves around inner confidence.
This video takes me back to school days, when some of the girls used to say well dressed boys were weak men. And they loved the super rough neck.
Thats female nature in its raw and truest form (caveman wiring). They then shape themselves to how the world works when they get older and change their ideals.
I’m a woman and I found this video helpful both personally and professionally. I always knew I liked rough around the edges, blue-collar, masculine men because my daddy was one and I grew up around those men. I work in a corporate setting and I am not attracted to the men here. I am a pretty, quiet woman and I’ve had uncomfortable experiences rejecting the white collar, effeminate types. I want to move up in the world and realized I need to move differently. I appreciate the video!
It's because we live in a gynocentric world and "Social Class" is looked at in a somewhat feminine way. i.e. in the blue-collar world, the top in the class is the most resourceful person. At the gym the top of the class is the strongest person, in a battlefield the top of the class is the one who displays strategic leadership skills and controlled aggression.... it is relative to the environment.
This sounds like a video for the creator to justify to himself (and others) why he thinks he is "soft". Sounds like being called soft is one of his insecurities.
Anyway, this is an interesting topic, and he explained it well until he started rambling in the last half of the video.
Agreed brother was definitely justifying be this way
Well thought out perspective
Great video! Thanks for your knowledge
What about the Tate brothers? If you can make a short video on them it would be interesting
I’ll have to look into them first but sure
My dad is the CEO of a pretty big software company. You nailed it.
I have seen very few upper class sef made rich man who are feminine
Its the ones who are born into wealth who are weak, I seen it so many times.
My guess would be since they couldn't get chicks they studied more and indulged themselves into technology. Whereas the more alpha male type was swimming in the women. In general of course.
I don’t think that was the takeaway here at all. The idea that only “alpha men” attract women is false
@@xavier.clb1 Who said anything about "only"?
It is more so that upper class men are more educated and that education helps them understand they don't need to conform to the expectations that lower class men don't understand that they don't need to conform to.
Highly educated upper class men were not the athletic, popular types back in their youth so they make it up for it with intelligence, higher education and money, compared to the bad boy/alpha male types who got chicks because of their physical looks, soft skills and charisma on the flip side bad boys invest less time into higher education.
It’s instinctive for women to be attracted to the “primitive” hypermasculine part of man. It does not mean every woman will be attracted to that man because there are other factors that determine attraction beyond superficial red pill talking points like.
Does Upper class automatically equate to above average intellect??
Intellect no, education yes. May not be the brightest but can spell and do basic math better than average (in America, where most of the country is illiterate)
@xavier.clb1 Thanks, would be nice when if you can dive into .. upper class Education vs Normal Education. From Kindergarten until varsity... any dynamics that stand out
This is a great topic! Yes
I went to a top tier private day school. You don't do that without having the brains.
Since 1875 society has been transitioning to meritocracy. It's formula for success is
IQ + HARD EFFORT = MERIT.
Where does Donald Trump fit into this hypothesis?
Very interesting discussion by the way. I saw an excellent interview with Chris Gardener (inspiration for Pursuit of Happiness) when asked about his struggle with breaking into financial services and if he believed it was to do with racism, he straight away said it was not, it was "placism" ie they couldn't figure where his "place" in the system belonged as he didn't go to certain schools etc...
I stop after you called yourself elegant
😂😂
8:40, 10:15