Are Cells Cognitive? - Interview with James Shapiro
Вставка
- Опубліковано 15 вер 2024
- Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @subboorahmadabbasi
Don't forget to Like, Comment, Subscribe and Share for more content inshaAllah.
Email: darwiniandelusions@gmail.com
/ darwiniandelusions
Facebook: / subboor.ahmad
Twitter: / subboorahmad
Instagram: www.instagram....
*Are Cells Cognitive? - Interview with James Shapiro* || _01 September 2024 ; Sunday_
0:00:00 Stream begins with welcoming Prof James Shapiro
_The interview_
0:01:02 Prof Shapiro describes what he means by "cognitive" in his landmark paper titled "All living cells are cognitive"
0:02:27 Prof claims that the crucial proofreading system in reproduction is a cognitive system
0:04:58 The genome not being a faithful self-replicator requires an input from the cell to help it replicate
0:05:37 The errors would be efficient to lead the organism essentially to disintegration without the presence of the proofreading system
0:07:44 Prof's response to Richard Dawkins' claim that existence of proofreading system does not really take away gene-centric perspective
0:09:06 Proofreading system does have an impact in terms of causality
0:09:43 Prof elaborates his claim that genome is not a read-only memory (ROM) system rather a read-write (RWM) memory system
0:12:32 All the processes taught about by genetics that lead to biological novelties are well documented
0:14:02 Prof elucidates how genome restructuring occurring in various organisms challenges the overall picture in Neo Darwinism
0:15:46 Genome restructuring is like a prefabricated framework used organically to change the genome in a much faster way
0:18:53 Prof explains why he had emphasised on genome restructuring while majority of the biological community had failed to observe its significance
0:22:12 Prof clarifies why randomness is not adequate to explain biological novelty as opposed to standard Neo Darwinian story
0:23:40 Prof explains why crystal metaphor of genome self-replication should be dropped as the proofreading system is known today
0:25:07 Prof shares some of the implications for the cancer research works that he has been involved in with Prof Denis Noble
0:27:09 Prof's opinion on Prof Noble's claim that human body has the ability to downgrade the proofreading system to increase the mutation rate
0:29:40 One-way causation of the central dogma is not correct
0:32:12 Research area on extracellular vesicles or Darwin’s gemmules, and its implications
0:34:33 Prof defines a gene [[ a great oversimplification ]]
0:37:01 Prof describes the implications of the two conclusions he has mentioned on his paper "All living cells are cognitive"
0:40:01 Prof explains why Neo Darwinism is still commanding evolutionary biology
0:45:11 Prof briefly shares other works that he is presently involved in
0:47:56 Thanking Prof James Shapiro for the interview
@@r.rahman12 brother may Allah give you and your family the house highest Jannah
@@SubboorAhmadAbbasi ameen, brother. timestamps were also posted for the Interview With Perry Marshall held on 24 June 2024.
@@SubboorAhmadAbbasi Aameen
@@r.rahman12 you don't know how helpful this is jazakallahkhair, I'll pin them now
There is an excellent book “The Way of the Cell” by Franklin M. Harold published in 2001 which goes into detail of how even simple bacteria ‘think' and store memory. It also warns against the even then already prevalent ideology of reductionism in biology.
Suboor bro - please add a brief description of the video.
You need to bring on more of the Third Way researchers
Thanks
👏
"" Is James Shapiro a Design theorist?"
James Shapiro replies.
"" I was intrigued by Bill Dembski's Jan 12 article. "" Is Dembski saying he abandons the supernatural as a component of Intelligent Design? If so, then we can start a real scientific dialogue about the possible nature's of intelligence, teleology, and Design in biology and how to investigate them theoretically and experimentally.
However, if he does not want to abandon the supernatural ( as Micheal Behe repeatedly tells he does not) and if he wishes always to have a resource to a literal Deus Ex Machina, then we cannot have a serious discussion"".
Shapiro also says "" Does Dembski have an empirical basis for asserting "" they must derive from a non biological source" ? If so I would appreciate learning what it is"" End of quote.
ERROR. I quoted Shapiro as saying re Dembski.."" then we cannot have a serious discussion.""
ACTUALLY my quote was wrong.
The actual quote said "" then we cannot have a serious scientific discussion"" End of quote
With apologies.
❤️❤️❤️🌹🌹🌹🤲🤲🤲
"" WHY THE THIRD WAY OF EVOLUTION IS NECESSARY""
James Shapiro 2021.
"" When all of the phenomena overlooked by The Modern Synthesis are taken into consideration, it is not difficult to answer Intelligent Design arguments and show that Science is makeing real progress in understanding the evolution of of biological complexity"" End of quote.
I think you are a bot