Homo-Naledi is not our ancestor: Mathole Motshekga

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 27

  • @warren14567
    @warren14567 Місяць тому +2

    Those are fossils of Ramaphosas anceStars not ours

  • @kgampaledwaba3440
    @kgampaledwaba3440 9 років тому +7

    i fully agree with Dr. Motshekga, first we must know what came first between human and animals lastly there is a different between create and creature

  • @DZ-bz1ww
    @DZ-bz1ww 2 роки тому +1

    Can't believe I spent 6 minutes to listen to a lawyer talk about human evolution and universe.

  • @johnoconnell6096
    @johnoconnell6096 9 років тому +3

    So some dude not qualified in paleoanthropology makes a comment and some how it must be taken as gospel for Human evolution, give me a break. why not evaluate the evidence and conduct experiments rather than mouth off or does that not fit the excepted world scientific view/order of hominin evolution?

  • @africanroseafricanrose849
    @africanroseafricanrose849 9 років тому +4

    Interesting..the debate is long overdue..The African version(since Africa is the origin of all man kind) has to be heard by the rest of the world..just shared this on my FB account, from us in the netherlands ,thank you for not suppressing the other side of the findings, Si ya bonga SABC

    • @EugeneHorak
      @EugeneHorak 9 років тому +2

      really?

    • @sjme1000
      @sjme1000 9 років тому

      +Eugene Horak
      I agree - their lame excuses are getting lamer by the day. Still blaming everybody - yet doing nothing at all.

    • @joema500
      @joema500 11 місяців тому

      No, this isn't the "african" version. This is the dumbass version. Literally everything he's claiming that the scientists said was never said or claimed by the scientists. He's literally putting words in their mouth and showing how immensely uneducated he is on the topic.

  • @differous01
    @differous01 9 років тому

    4:45 "...most ancient and true story about the origins..." The most ancient writing system is cuneiform, which contains true records of stellar observations as far back as ten thousand BC.
    Most of what was written in Accadian about man's origins is manifestly UNtrue, but any writing system existent before that should make headline news when Motshekga provides the evidence for his 36,000BC claims.

  • @AsFewFalseThingsAsPossible
    @AsFewFalseThingsAsPossible 3 роки тому +1

    Nobody is suggesting H. naledi is our ancestor. No more than your cousin is your ancestor.

    • @joema500
      @joema500 11 місяців тому

      exactly, we cannot know if it is our direct ancestor. But we can know our relation to it.

  • @dannthamann1104
    @dannthamann1104 9 років тому +5

    I agree with the man....

  • @americalost5100
    @americalost5100 3 роки тому +1

    Oh my... Maybe some Christians will believe this guy. Making pronunciations out of thin air without evidence

  • @WayneBorean
    @WayneBorean 4 роки тому +1

    ROFLMAO.

  • @mongisisithole2701
    @mongisisithole2701 9 років тому

    never criticize what you don't understand. you can't critically analyse a book you never read.

  • @Mojave4ever
    @Mojave4ever 9 років тому +2

    Ah, I see - he wants money. Seriously? What a bunch of mumbo jumbo.

  • @sumodog602
    @sumodog602 9 років тому +2

    somebody shut this dude up

  • @sumodog602
    @sumodog602 9 років тому +4

    somebody shut this dude up