How it Works Fat Man Oppenheimer Trinity Atomic Bomb

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 лип 2023
  • Oppenheimer Trinity Test, marked the inception of the implosion-design plutonium, eventually leading to the detonation of the Fat Man atomic weapon, over Nagasaki.
    The outer charge explodes inward, followed by the inner ring of explosives, creating a concave shockwave.
    It moves to the Aluminum pusher, breaking the barren plastic sphere.
    The shockwaves continue toward the uranium-two three eight, It travels further compressing the plutonium sphere and compressing it more.
    Interestingly this was James Tuck idea.
    A British physicist who suggested employing shaped charges as three-dimensional explosive lenses.
    But it was further developed and perfected by Von Neumann, a Hungarian-American mathematician, physicist and computer scientist.
    Instagram
    / aitelly3d
    Twitter
    / aitelly3d
    We make it on Blender
    Download it is free and Safe
    www.blender.org/download/
    Peace Out
    As a Small Channel We encourage you sharing our Videos ,
    But Kindly be advised that any unofficial translations or editing of our work in any medium will be considered a breach of our intellectual property rights.
    Apologies for the Legal Language, This happens because we had faced a lot of Duplicates Contents through Experiences ;)
    This has been a result of Big Channels Duplicating our Contents Ripping our original hard work which we have created from Scratch from Modeling to Rigging to Animation to Rendering.So we had to involved Lawyers.
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 458

  • @zorintoto1167
    @zorintoto1167 10 місяців тому +732

    Can you show us a step by step tutorial how to build one please .

    • @turbopower7308
      @turbopower7308 10 місяців тому +71

      😂😂😂 lol

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  10 місяців тому +126

      😅

    • @monojitdey2238
      @monojitdey2238 10 місяців тому +35

      Please make video on this

    • @SV2098
      @SV2098 10 місяців тому +77

      Iran wants to know your location

    • @rajareddy391
      @rajareddy391 10 місяців тому +4

      😂😂

  • @azzael321
    @azzael321 10 місяців тому +103

    Clean visuals + very simplified commentary makes a big difference in understanding for us non-academic folks.

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  10 місяців тому +6

      🙏 Your Awesome we tried our best.

  • @TheMau5meister
    @TheMau5meister 10 місяців тому +239

    To think that this was 80 years ago, and we still have people that think the world is flat to this day. Great explanation, thank you!

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  10 місяців тому +13

      Your Awesome too 👍 thanks 🙏

    • @vishveshtadsare3160
      @vishveshtadsare3160 10 місяців тому +2

      Its not hard

    • @terrancebulong4573
      @terrancebulong4573 10 місяців тому +9

      @@vishveshtadsare3160 ah yeah I'm sure you and your grandmother can build one out of the scrap in your backyard yah

    • @jpotter2086
      @jpotter2086 10 місяців тому +5

      ... and this now a very crude design. We marvel over miniaturization in our electronics, but nukes did it first!

    • @chrismusix5669
      @chrismusix5669 10 місяців тому +4

      @@vishveshtadsare3160 The engineering is hard. Getting the focused explosives into the right shape, the thicknesses of the layers around the core, and the fuse timing takes a bit of calculation.

  • @Aitelly
    @Aitelly  10 місяців тому +5

    Please Subs
    We love you Guys!
    even our Haters too!

  • @twill.AF9002
    @twill.AF9002 10 місяців тому +15

    This was done very well from a scientific perspective! As a retired member of the USAF with hundreds of hours of aircrew time I love it.

  • @cholaempire
    @cholaempire 10 місяців тому +6

    Incredible video. The amount of effort you put into this is amazing

  • @dontmesswiththeriddim2699
    @dontmesswiththeriddim2699 10 місяців тому +33

    These animations (Blender's not that easy to master), and the work you guys put in, AND of course the concise explanations as to what and how it happened is otherworldly! Love your channel and these videos; keep them coming! Subbed for your amazing work that you guys put in ♥
    And yes, I will consult my friendly neighbourhood nuclear physicist too for more; he may or may not be building a bomb to show me how it happens in situ

    • @casedistorted
      @casedistorted 9 місяців тому

      Still curious if they use AI for the voice narration with some of the weird pronunciations.

  • @HistoryfortheAges
    @HistoryfortheAges 10 місяців тому +25

    I am a history professor. Saw Oppenheimer and loved it! I am no expert on the science behind all this, so this was a cool video. Thank you! The History of the movie was pretty spot on, but if you wondered how much of the little stories within the movie were true I made a new video on my channel answering many of those questions. Happy to share. Every historical movie embellishes some things, but overall it was a very accurate movie and amazing to watch!

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  10 місяців тому +2

      Happy to watch your videos 👍 thanks for your information

    • @ghost307
      @ghost307 10 місяців тому +1

      One science item that I noticed was Oppenheimer giving General Groves his estimate of 3 kilotons for the Trinity test.
      Oppenheimer actually thought that it wouldn't work being their very first attempt.

    • @Rose-jr4tx
      @Rose-jr4tx 10 місяців тому +1

      Speaking of history, The fact that the "Christian" West would commit and practice a great many cardinal sins, many of them knowingly, such as centuries-long global;
      - 'Colonization',
      - 'Genocide',
      - 'Slavery',
      - 'Colonialism',
      - 'Global Warming', etc which benefits them enormously for centuries worldwide; then they would initiate and take a measure to ban those practices worldwide, and take credit for it.
      [Note: Today's global warming is caused in large part by nearly two centuries of excessive coal burning, mainly in the West.]
      Christian European Colonization of,
      - North America & South America,
      - Siberia & Far-East Asia,
      - Australia & New Zealand in Asia-Pacific. 😔
      Europe for Native Europeans,
      Africa for Native Africans,
      America for Native Americans,
      Asia-Pacific for Native Asians-Pacific islanders. 🤷

  • @buckhorncortez
    @buckhorncortez 10 місяців тому +6

    The explosive lenses had two different explosives. The outer explosive was Composition B (fast explosive) and then the inner explosive Baratol (slow explosive). Composition B is a mixture of RDX (cyclotiimethylenetrirutiamine) and TNT (trinitrotoluene). Composition B consists of RDX (59.5 %, by mass), TNT (39.5 %) and desensitizing wax (1%). This explosive has a density of 1.70 g/cm3, and a detonation velocity of 8480 m/s. Baratol is a mixture of barium nitrate and TNT. It is 76% barium nitrate and 24% TNT. It has a density of 2.64 grams/cm3 and a detonation velocity of 4900 m/s. The final inner layer of explosives next to the pusher was made of Composition B.

  • @user-gd5io7zi9u
    @user-gd5io7zi9u 10 місяців тому +3

    Outstanding work as always keep it up . Incredible video. The amount of effort you put into this is amazing.

  • @user-eu9cy8bs2f
    @user-eu9cy8bs2f 19 годин тому

    J'adore regarder plusieurs de vos vidéos d'une traite, même si après je fini par avoir de maux de tête car je dois les voir en sous-titré. Vous faites un travail magnifique.

  • @porfirioErodriguez
    @porfirioErodriguez 10 місяців тому +4

    I always like your vids mate... the 2 people behind the animations are top-notch. Always recommend this channel to a fellow UA-cam watcher out there. Great stuff.

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  10 місяців тому +1

      Your awesome mate 👍
      Thanks 👍

  • @ahmedaldawood4
    @ahmedaldawood4 10 місяців тому +4

    Outstanding work as always keep it up 👍🏻

  • @beyondinfinity3876
    @beyondinfinity3876 10 місяців тому +6

    One of the most detailed video about nuxlear weapon!🙏🙏

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  10 місяців тому +2

      Thanks 👍

  • @NicolasPare
    @NicolasPare 10 місяців тому +6

    I appreciate your videos immensely. Amazing quality, content is always interesting, just beautifully delivered information It's always a nice surprise to be notified of a new video.

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  10 місяців тому

      Thanks Nicola Pare we love you guys 🙏

  • @illuzionizhere-bobbyfpv5977
    @illuzionizhere-bobbyfpv5977 10 місяців тому +8

    So freaking awesome (the animation that is)!
    Very good presentation; easy to follow and understand. Keep em coming!! o7

  • @luisevidal
    @luisevidal 9 місяців тому +1

    This is an outstanding explanation of this subject. You guys are incredibly good.

  • @YenPitchayen
    @YenPitchayen 9 місяців тому +2

    Great as always. Nicely done.

  • @kamesh276
    @kamesh276 9 місяців тому

    Awesome animation explaining the complex concepts. Great work!

  • @aliframdani_
    @aliframdani_ 9 місяців тому +1

    Incredibel animation and easy to understand explanation. Love it!

  • @paulhofman
    @paulhofman 10 місяців тому +1

    What a beautiful animation. Well done.

  • @Shadobanned4life
    @Shadobanned4life 10 місяців тому +1

    Excellent video. Thank You ! 🌞

  • @claudiocorleone7856
    @claudiocorleone7856 10 місяців тому +28

    Unbelievable what these men accomplished . No computers to calculate what then took months to do today those calculations would be done in hours. Total respect.

    • @perniciouspete4986
      @perniciouspete4986 10 місяців тому +3

      "hours"? Do you have a steam-powered computer?

    • @GeoffreyFeldmanMA
      @GeoffreyFeldmanMA 9 місяців тому

      Seconds, not hours. I wish people would not comment with their unique feelings and personal speculations. Nobody cares if such as you have "total respect". What does "total respect" mean anyway? So - why post?

    • @dontgetmadgetwise4271
      @dontgetmadgetwise4271 9 місяців тому +3

      They did have computers. But your point is not without merit.

    • @luceatlux7087
      @luceatlux7087 9 місяців тому

      ​@@GeoffreyFeldmanMA While I understand and identify with your feelings, your approach is probably one that would tend to spread a bit of a negative, overcritical regard for our fellow human beings.
      23 people identified with and purportedly enjoyed the sentiment to which you refer. Thus the more appropriate question might be: Why let such a benign expression elicit such disrespect ('No one cares if such as you...)?
      ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      further reading if you're a reader. if it's some kind of buirden, forget it. "ain't know won gunna reed all that!"
      -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Just fwiw, I've ultimately come to the conclusion that, with the goal of prioritizing disdain properly and homing in on/understanding those who are TRULY making life worse (and curbing their influence vs helping the better influences), it's best to forgive the smaller things that have basically kindly intentions behind them (eg, this op would likely mostly be an expression to simply connect with others about a harmless emotion of being in awe; a positive regard of another).
      There is SO much ego-driven, incredibly-ill-considered, narrow judgment out there that's PURPOSEFULLY DESIGNED to belittle and spread negativity. So I always try and just silently forgive and forget irritations when people are just being people (sometimes absent-minded, irritating etc).
      If I work through it and understand that the intentions are essentially benevolent, I kinda' see it as a case of not being one of the 'patient zeros' for transmitting the true irritants in life.
      Not to mention, when you have the idiots who love the emotional tone of the intelligent harsher-spirited criticisms, they try to emulate this kind of thing (in an effort to exalt their immature egos) and it comes out as invalid criticisms of everyone they disagree with because they aren't smart enough to deliver valid perspectives or content with their emotional expression... smearing vehement ignorance all over the place.
      I guess I try to identify the intention behind stuff and try to understand what kind of regard it spreads (how des it affect idiots... smart people? average people? youths/immature people? etc)... or not; whatever.
      I try to save my emotionally-based criticisms (as yours is) for the REAL F'Kers who make things suck in life.
      sht... loooong....
      oh well. take it, leave it. just thought i'd share some ideas about the issue.

  • @baotrangia3417
    @baotrangia3417 2 місяці тому

    Thank you so much for this animation!

  • @johnsmith-hf1hm
    @johnsmith-hf1hm 10 місяців тому

    Beautiful vidi of the process, nicely stylized. You guys have a future in this biz. Subscribing now.

  • @channghiem5012
    @channghiem5012 5 місяців тому

    thanks for this video and explanation!

  • @thomazbarros9146
    @thomazbarros9146 9 місяців тому +7

    So, the bomb is a football ball 🤣🤣

  • @satujie1653
    @satujie1653 10 місяців тому

    It is fookin awesome..
    Great one mate 👍

  • @Rarest.Ranger320
    @Rarest.Ranger320 2 місяці тому

    10/10 step by step tutorial

  • @cachito1984
    @cachito1984 10 місяців тому

    Nice break down and explanation

  • @BillRau2152
    @BillRau2152 10 місяців тому +6

    It’s amazing they had the technology to make the three different radioactive parts of the device in perfect nested spheres

    • @jakistam1000
      @jakistam1000 10 місяців тому +2

      The fact that they are radioactive didn't matter much; they were just metals. As long as you don't exceed the critical mass, you can melt it, hit it with hammers, cut it etc., and it isn't any more dangerous than just standing next to it.

    • @piotrd.4850
      @piotrd.4850 4 місяці тому

      @@jakistam1000 well actually, both uranium and plutionium are heavy metals, thus are toxic - and plutoium is particularly vicious. It sheds, is easily to oxidize, is cancerogenic as faq, produces bubbles of hydrogen inside.

  • @Awesome21
    @Awesome21 10 місяців тому +4

    keep doing great work guys 👍

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  10 місяців тому

      Thanks You👍
      Your Awesome

  • @venkatreddy9693
    @venkatreddy9693 10 місяців тому +1

    I always love your videos. Great indepth analysis. Can you make the video differentiating the nuclear and non nuclear bombs?

  • @micahtataje
    @micahtataje 10 місяців тому +1

    Love the video! Gotta do the H-bomb next

  • @andykay479
    @andykay479 10 місяців тому +2

    Amazing video thanks. The thing I would have liked to have seen explained is why the design of the plutonium bomb changed so radically from that of the uranium bomb, but I understand the constraints you face in making this kind of video. More please!

    • @dontgetmadgetwise4271
      @dontgetmadgetwise4271 9 місяців тому +3

      Plutonium 239 is much more responsive to stray neutrons. The gun approach would have failed to bring the two components together before the energy released busted the assembly apart. A fizzle.

  • @Darkosa1234
    @Darkosa1234 10 місяців тому +2

    Great presentation!

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  10 місяців тому

      Thanks 👍 Your Great Too

  • @UntitledJAY_1Q
    @UntitledJAY_1Q 10 місяців тому +3

    Great channel for my little brother who always ask questions on how things work. He love your channel AiTelly ❤️❤️ keep it up.

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  10 місяців тому +1

      Glad your Brother liked it 😁
      Your Awesome

  • @markchapman2585
    @markchapman2585 10 місяців тому +2

    Great video really detailed.

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  10 місяців тому

      Thanks 👍

  • @xandervideo1
    @xandervideo1 10 місяців тому

    Very interesting, thank you.

  • @markgilmore2077
    @markgilmore2077 8 місяців тому

    Great work, please make more

  • @Robolaralobarar
    @Robolaralobarar 7 місяців тому

    Very good as usual

  • @samuelmarquez1635
    @samuelmarquez1635 9 місяців тому

    WOW!!!! I LOVE YOUR VIDEOS GUYS!

  • @paulhofman
    @paulhofman 10 місяців тому +2

    At 2:14 'the main fusion material' should be 'the main fission material'. Like Uranium, plutonium was used for nuclear fission, not fusion. Fusion was only used in the later and more potent thermonuclear bombs.

  • @typerightseesight
    @typerightseesight 10 місяців тому +2

    this is so massive i had to watch it like 5x to understand it for some reason.

  • @Bluedot1
    @Bluedot1 9 місяців тому +1

    Dear Mr. AiTelly
    You gave a very nice explanation with 3D visuals…
    It is mind-boggling to see the depiction of this type of weapons operating on the earth's surface in a habitable place.... It is the desire of the people of the world to use this science only for creation...
    My thanks to you for making it clear to those who don't know

  • @StrayzKid
    @StrayzKid 10 місяців тому

    Great work

  • @ARTIFICIALFAITHOFFICAL
    @ARTIFICIALFAITHOFFICAL 10 місяців тому

    Very well done video 👍

  • @laxmidattadeshpande3722
    @laxmidattadeshpande3722 9 місяців тому

    Excellent video

  • @chfin7251
    @chfin7251 5 місяців тому

    Well done!

  • @manikantasriram98
    @manikantasriram98 2 місяці тому

    Editor deserves a salute

  • @pjwarez
    @pjwarez 10 місяців тому

    Ahhhh.. the magic of Blender 3D. Cool!

  • @VIC_TOR_
    @VIC_TOR_ 10 місяців тому

    Thank you

  • @vivekrohar9485
    @vivekrohar9485 8 місяців тому +1

    amazing sir

  • @Martinroot
    @Martinroot 7 місяців тому

    Really nice video guys...
    An idea for next one: The tsar bomb?

  • @SevenDeMagnus
    @SevenDeMagnus 4 місяці тому

    Cool, thanks sir Oppenheimer.
    God bless.

  • @danielweaver7435
    @danielweaver7435 10 місяців тому +1

    Good job i know how hard thisust be to animate this stuff i live your stuff

  • @zillsburyy1
    @zillsburyy1 10 місяців тому +6

    its crazy how Oppenheimer gets all the credit

    • @krymsun3134
      @krymsun3134 10 місяців тому +2

      Nah the movie describes what he did very well.

    • @garrymullins
      @garrymullins 10 місяців тому

      Someone has to take credit when they're able to move from theory to practice, if the original theorist isn't able to do it.

    • @perniciouspete4986
      @perniciouspete4986 10 місяців тому +1

      ​@@krymsun3134Nope. Oppenheimer's most important contribution was reorganizing the project, and the movie didn't say one damned thing about it.

    • @krymsun3134
      @krymsun3134 10 місяців тому

      @@perniciouspete4986 what are you talking about he spent an hour organizing it lmao

  • @lorentzinvariant7348
    @lorentzinvariant7348 2 місяці тому

    Thank you for properly demonstrating the way the neutron causes fission. So many descriptions out there imply the neutron blows apart the nucleus kinetically as it randomly spits and releases neutrons. This is not the case. The neutron gets close enough to be absorbed by the nuclear force that acts at very small distances only. Upon absorption the nucleus becomes unstable and blows apart into specific fragments predefined by the internal dynamics involved also releasing additional neutrons in the process. There is a finite time between neutron absorption and fission.

  • @jigdalbhutia8112
    @jigdalbhutia8112 10 місяців тому +4

    You n yr team creativity and dedication to producing high-quality content are truly commendable. It's evident that you put your heart and soul into each video, and that passion shines through in every frame.
    Your videos have not only entertained me but have also broadened my perspective on different subjects. Your thoughtful approach to complex issues has encouraged me to think critically and explore new ideas. God bless

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  10 місяців тому +1

      God bless you too my friend 🙏
      We love you Guys.

  • @chadtopia
    @chadtopia 10 місяців тому

    great video

  • @adbell3364
    @adbell3364 9 місяців тому

    Very cool!

  • @jamesboekbinder3967
    @jamesboekbinder3967 3 місяці тому

    Very nicely done! I wonder if there is an overview somewhere of all the work - metallurgy, chemists, physicists, others, who contributed to the creation of the device?

  • @IHORSHCHERBAN
    @IHORSHCHERBAN 10 місяців тому

    Good job.

  • @gerthie
    @gerthie 9 місяців тому

    Brilliant

  • @noyfub
    @noyfub 9 місяців тому

    Good Job.

  • @communard-mx6rb
    @communard-mx6rb 10 місяців тому +1

    great how to! mine's almost complete

  • @satishstha6317
    @satishstha6317 10 місяців тому

    Awesome video with amazing detail.Could you please make a video on how a fusion bomb works.....😊😊😊

  • @clex2005
    @clex2005 2 дні тому

    Very good.

  • @eramires
    @eramires 9 місяців тому

    Implosion is the most elegant solution IMO, I loved the Manhattan Project show that explores the development of the method. 🙂

  • @blackoutalmaty3905
    @blackoutalmaty3905 10 місяців тому +1

    Last two videos is very Nice

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  10 місяців тому +1

      Thanks 👍

  • @RickardoPandiangan
    @RickardoPandiangan 10 місяців тому +2

    the plug was switched, not removed

  • @mynameisyasser
    @mynameisyasser 9 місяців тому

    Good stuff

  • @elident7828
    @elident7828 5 місяців тому +1

    Damn 24 volts and destruction beyond imagination … kinda silly when you think about like that… another great animation and video; I always wanted a play by play synopsis of what’s happening during this destructive process… question were there any cameras that actually were fast enough to catch each phase of the detonation ?

  • @ARKHAMxMaverick
    @ARKHAMxMaverick 9 місяців тому

    Thank you, I walked away feeling I almost understood this.

  • @kingqbert6819
    @kingqbert6819 10 місяців тому

    Mind boggling how this was developed!! Harnessing the power of stars in the universe - wow!

    • @perniciouspete4986
      @perniciouspete4986 10 місяців тому

      Fusion is the power of stars, not fission. Think H-bomb versus A-bomb.

  • @ramchandramaurya6622
    @ramchandramaurya6622 10 місяців тому

    Again brilliant video , Best in how it's works . Thanks .... Kindly request to make the same level video on F 35 , especially DAS , data fusion , type tech working .... Thanks a lot ...

  • @sriharsha8386
    @sriharsha8386 10 місяців тому

    Cool Animation

  • @ajmanto4941
    @ajmanto4941 7 місяців тому

    This is educational

  • @aldrichuyliong8143
    @aldrichuyliong8143 10 місяців тому +8

    It's sorta crazy how simple the construction seems of so much death.

  • @danipineschi6924
    @danipineschi6924 10 місяців тому

    awesome

  • @leeread6757
    @leeread6757 10 місяців тому

    I met Commander Frederick Ashworth at a presentation in Los Alamos in 2005.
    Had an interesting conversation with him after the presentation. He was 93 years old and passed away a few months later.
    He armed the Nagasaki bomb( Fat Man).

  • @Suggsonbass
    @Suggsonbass 9 місяців тому

    Ok thanks I'll try this out in my shed. You'll hear about it if it works

  • @Phil-D83
    @Phil-D83 10 місяців тому +1

    Do one on the castle bravo fusion weapon, and the subsequent salted bomb variants

  • @Mockheed_Lartin
    @Mockheed_Lartin 10 місяців тому +1

    A video on how large aircraft carriers float and work please 🥺

  • @cdaworldnav
    @cdaworldnav 10 місяців тому

    nice and better understand, just watched the movie.

  • @seanmarkovich7563
    @seanmarkovich7563 10 місяців тому +1

    I thought they removed green plugs and placed in red ones? Or did they just pull three two red on green as shown?

  • @chrislau9835
    @chrislau9835 10 місяців тому

    Nice video

  • @jaysartori9032
    @jaysartori9032 10 місяців тому

    So interesting

  • @darthcheeseburger
    @darthcheeseburger 10 місяців тому

    Amazing video. I wish they had taken some time to explain the inner workings of the bomb in the film. It would've been helpful to better understand it.

    • @perniciouspete4986
      @perniciouspete4986 10 місяців тому +1

      They would have lost 90% of the audience, which has the attention span of butterflies.

  • @MrTastyM7
    @MrTastyM7 10 місяців тому

    Great to watch after watching the movie

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  10 місяців тому

      Your Awesome 👍😎

  • @jasonl_
    @jasonl_ 6 місяців тому

    Great video with a very accurate explanation. I'm not sure the high explosives were actually comprised of two layers, rather, the slow HX fitted inside the fast HX at the bottom of the lens, but that's a minor detail. Also, Jon Von Neumann is pronounced Noyman but again, a minor quibble in an otherwise excellent video.

  • @beibisons
    @beibisons 10 місяців тому

    nice nioce job

  • @allinero1
    @allinero1 10 місяців тому

    Nice

  • @aboutface102
    @aboutface102 10 місяців тому +4

    Just watched Oppenheimer, great film. I do wish they had explained the science of the bomb a little more and the politics a little less :)

    • @buckhorncortez
      @buckhorncortez 4 місяці тому +1

      The movie was based on the book, "American Prometheus." That book deals with Oppenheimer and his life and not the science of the Project. That's why the science was tangential to the story of Oppenheimer in the movie.

  • @Zehnstern
    @Zehnstern 10 місяців тому

    I need to build a couple of these bombs myself. Make a turorial please.🙏

  • @weirdothings8672
    @weirdothings8672 8 місяців тому

    Only thing missing was the bgm
    NOW I HAVE BECOME DEATH THE DESTROYER OF WORLDS
    GREAT! work dudes
    Keep rocking 🤘

  • @aryehyehudahajzenberg9503
    @aryehyehudahajzenberg9503 10 місяців тому +2

    WOW ! WOW ! WOW !
    SHOW ! SHOW ! SHOW !
    That's what we have to call a fancy grade A+ 3D video !
    Fantastic !
    It's been years I have been waiting for a precise, concise and clear explanation of the nuclear bombs !
    You guys are simply the best !
    Keep up the excellent work and may God bless you always !
    Thanks !

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  10 місяців тому

      Thank You So much. We love you guys

  • @NickyGi
    @NickyGi 5 місяців тому

    I wish they explained more of how the bomb was built in the movie.

  • @notbugs
    @notbugs 10 місяців тому +3

    Concise and informative!

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  10 місяців тому

      Thanks 👍

  • @patrikhenriksson7731
    @patrikhenriksson7731 10 місяців тому

    hi thanks for the video are u still working on the patria video?