Track Star SEG .21ci / 3.5cc RC NItro Engine

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 лип 2024
  • Track Star .21 Engine Blueprint

КОМЕНТАРІ • 15

  • @needmoreboost6369
    @needmoreboost6369 Рік тому +1

    This channel should get more like’s

  • @EBMods
    @EBMods  7 років тому +3

    Hello sorry but I actually never finished the video series. The next video was going to break down what the numbers mean, and what you can do to adjust the power curve.

    • @FargothPL
      @FargothPL 5 років тому

      Even if you've never completed a series of movies, I'm still grateful for what you've shown in this one movie. Nitro dies, and fans who have remained are doomed only to themselves. With this one material, you showed a lot of secrets that I did not know about. I am trying to get a bit more power from another engine (Vertex VX18), but the information you have shared is very valuable. Thank you.

    • @vbake8354
      @vbake8354 Місяць тому

      I know it’s been a long time but if you could make a quick video on this I would appreciate it

  • @RBAERO
    @RBAERO 3 роки тому

    That's a great info about rc engines. Do you complete de series of blueprint an nitro engine?

  • @turbofiero86
    @turbofiero86 7 років тому +1

    would it be worth it to put a bushing in the small end of the rod? or does the bushing-less small end really hold up?

  • @godsun358
    @godsun358 Рік тому

    I have a trackstar .32 but the backplate and oneway bearing are destroyed do you know how I can order these replacement parts?

  • @sonicstep
    @sonicstep 7 років тому +1

    A potentially useful upload. Alas I have issues understanding 1/1000" and mixing it with decimalisation makes it even more odd (1,0 0,5 0,25 0,125mm) (1, 1/2, 1/4, 1/8mm). I find much easier to visualise as you are starting from a smaller part 1.000mm that is closer to what is being measured as opposed to starting from 25mm and so many parts of that.
    I also notice you use metric grams for mass. Why not all 'metric'? It is so much simpler. I have this same sort of issue over here with racing comentators talking in terms say 5/10 of a second instead of 1/2 a second or 0.5sec. It's as if they are trying to be clever, but they are not. They make it unnecessarily complicated. Very irritating for me.

  • @greenman407
    @greenman407 2 роки тому

    I am sorry that there are some that show no appreciation for the information that you have offered here. I was hoping that you would show in your next video on how to improve the power of an engine through modifications. There are software programs that help you to do that but I do not know how to acquire one that is Good

  • @mattinwinkymg
    @mattinwinkymg 7 років тому +2

    its all good measuring everything but whats the objective of all this

    • @turbofiero86
      @turbofiero86 7 років тому

      probably to compare to other engines... or just for fun

    • @FargothPL
      @FargothPL 4 роки тому

      He shows how to measure engines and at the same time shows his clients that he knows what he is doing. He checked all this to calculate more optimal port opening angles and exhaust port. It is a pity that it did not show how to change the power curve.

    • @c1bav
      @c1bav Рік тому

      Exactly my friend lol

  • @willacewallace5905
    @willacewallace5905 3 роки тому +1

    Why do you not use a degree wheel? Much easier process that will not require trig formula to figure out the degrees based on lone numbers.
    And weighing all the parts? Really?

  • @c1bav
    @c1bav Рік тому

    Too much brain damage who cares just have fun let it rip burn the engine rebuild it then burn again and on and on