Is the Sigma 70-200 actually better than the Sony 70-200?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 31 лип 2024
- 🎵 HIGH-QUALITY MUSIC FOR ALL FILMMAKERS (7 Day FREE TRIAL) -share.epidemicsound.com/vflx4k
All Gear Mentioned in this video↓↓↓
=======================================
Sony FX3: amzn.to/3RXJlxb
Sigma 70-200 f2/8: amzn.to/3K2wgzb
Sony 70-200 f2/8: amzn.to/3y84DSg
Connect with me on Social Media!
UA-cam: @jonathanrichey
Instagram: / jrichey.creative
Website: jonathanrichey.me
Question - Have a question about filmmaking, camera gear or making online content? Drop it in the comments!
⏰ Timecodes ⏰
0:00 - Sigma vs Sony: 70-200 F2.9 Lens Review
0:49 - Similarities between the 2 lenses
1:48 - Differences between the 2 lenses
7:09 - Test Footage Starts Here
9:18 - Final Thoughts
#sigma70200 #sony70200 #lensreview
About:
In this video Jonathan Richey compares the new Sigma 70-200 f2.8 with the Sony 70-200 f2.8.
He goes over the similarities and the differences between the 2 lenses and provides side by side test footage so you can make an informed decision about which lens you should buy.
*This video is not sponsored. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
Which lens do you think is the best bang for your buck?
The sigma is better than the Sony version I, but the Sony version II is better than the Sigma.
Many people don’t understand or know about Lens coatings. Sonys image is always neutral and natural. Sigma and tamron have this weird yellow/green tint baked into your photos and videos. This is great if you like that look, I personally hate it. I wish sigma and tamron would use the same coating as Sony, but then again it’s probably a secret Sony will never share.
I always wondered why the shots from my Sigma 18-35mm 1.8 EF-S looked so much warmer/greener than any of my Canon lenses on my old 250D.
Some colors pop more and there’s some perceived improved contrast but it doesn’t look as neutral or natural as say the 24-105 f4 L.
@@DanielMendozaDev bingo
Hey, what microphone do you use at your desk?
I'm using the Audio-Technica AT875R condenser mic. You can learn more about it here - amzn.to/3wwOVj8
the sigma vs sony GM ... for the price I would go for the sigma. But to compare it with the GM II ... I would go for the GM II. Thx for your review doing it with the GM I.
No problem, thx for watching! I'm curious, why would you pick the GM II ??
@@JonathanRichey Not So much of a price difference at this point and much faster AF, lighter and simply better
Btw... Thats not an A73 in the pic but an A7S3 >;)))
Right on, thanks for the correction.
No you wouldnt! Lol! You know you would go for the SONY all day long! When you are out there in the field shooting action... Sigma is known to have the worst AF out of the 3rd party lenses. Sony doesnt share its tech with 3rd party companies therefore Native is always the best with the body. Best AF, Stabe, etc... And you know this! >;)))
Thanks for watching and sharing your opinion. I've actually had great success with any Sigma lens I have shot on. However, my experience is limited and it is possible in a different context (like shooting action sports) the AF is not as good as Sony, but that might be a good idea for a future video!
I've never heard that it has the worst AF.
Since when does Sigma have the worst AF?