How AIs, like ChatGPT, Learn
Вставка
- Опубліковано 17 гру 2017
- How do all the algorithms, like ChatGPT, around us learn to do their jobs?
Footnote: • How AI, Like ChatGPT, ...
Thank you to my supporters on Patreon:
James Bissonette, James Gill, Cas Eliëns, Jeremy Banks, Thomas J Miller Jr MD, Jaclyn Cauley, David F Watson, Jay Edwards, Tianyu Ge, Michael Cao, Caron Hideg, Andrea Di Biagio, Andrey Chursin, Christopher Anthony, Richard Comish, Stephen W. Carson, JoJo Chehebar, Mark Govea, John Buchan, Donal Botkin, Bob Kunz
/ cgpgrey
How neural networks really work with the real linear algebra: • But what is a neural n...
Music by: www.davidreesmusic.com
A moment of silence for the bots that didn't make it
Mahir Cave.
All Bots Lives Matter!
some of them deserved it for recommending me "pranks gone wrong gone sexual" videos from watching cooking recipes
Mahir Cave i thought this was a robot holocaust video
Funny thing is most of them probably didn't even make it past a moment of life :D
Lets be honest, this is a more sensible and genius rebranding than Mark did with facebook.
Yep
I thought for a second that he knew about chatgpt 5 years ago and got excited
same, i found this super smart
except this explanation doesn't actually apply to ChatGPT or most modern AI models these days, those rely on a lot of complicated math stuff and not just natural selection
although the rebranding was a power play it is likely just going to misinform people
true
For a second I was wondering how he made ChatGPT 5 years before it was released
same, but then I took a glance at the comments section and it all made sense
yeah, felt a little manipulative tbh
@@thejackboxkinda true
@@thejackbox yeah it's quite clickbaity
when I saw this in my recommended, I was thinking "oh was ChatGPT a thing 5 years ago but just not as big as it is now?", not "oh I wonder how algorithms like ChatGPT work", mainly because I already generally know how algorithms work.
XD yeah
Brilliant use of renaming to get videos back in the algorithm.
For real 😂😂😂
Yep, was really surprised to see this again.
But honestly, this really was brilliant. :-P
That has to be a real UA-cam move
it’s still as accurate as ever
CGP seems to understand how the algorithm works
"Teacher bot can't teach but teacher bot can test"
Sounds familiar
:D güzel tespit
GLaDOS.
My high school math teacher?
Lol ! XD
Go fuck yoruself
"Teacher bot can't teach, but it can test."
*LMAOO literally my teacher*
Haha, you will get recycled next week cause you get 0.000001 point less than someone else in ur class
@@stachuvonokrutny7071 noo teacher please no god please!
Welcome to every school (-system) ever
LMAOO
Laughing
My
Ass
Off
Off.
I swear I have literally the best school in the world-
Did this guy just rebrand his how bots learn video from 5 years ago to get that chat gpt hype
Algorithm King
@@superprobablylevel fr
Ye
That's just how the system works
Fr
I must say, five years later, ChatGPT is making big news. They must have learned a lot watching us watch CGP Grey
ChatGPT *does* have a teacher bot, but they didn't kill all of his classmates unlike in this video.
Instead teacher bot was punished or rewarded based on how well it guessed what output from ChatGPT we humans would prefer.
Then it would punish or reward ChatGPT based on what teacher bot *thinks* we want, rinse and repeat till we got modern ChatGPT and Bing...
CGP-T Grey
He renamed the vid lately to push it into the algorithm again
@@H0RIZ0N365 It’s working
@@H0RIZ0N365 r/woooosh
Imagine scrolling through UA-cam and suddenly seeing a video recommended with the message "Please watch this, or they will delete me."
oh... ...no... 😟
That'd be borderline sentinent. Brrr... :D
That is so terrifying.
They learnt how to play on human emotions just like actual people. I wonder if this starts a philosophical question as to whether it is ethical to dismiss the video in the chamce that they are truly sentient.
I would watch it
*Dog in a bee suit.*
*A.I: yeah, that's a pretty legit bee*
*Literal white noise*
* A.I: that's a 3, wait no, a bee *
He's a pretty legit bee if he wants to be, leave dogbee alone!
@@SundaraRamanR He can bee a bee if he wants to bee, leave dogbee bee!
That bees being true
Big pair of breasts photographed sideways. Bot: that's a three !!!
The audacity to retitled this video for the chatgpt hype
I respect it
I was like "Was ChatGPT around 5 years ago?" And then I realized he just renamed how robots learn lmao
CAPTCHA: Select squares with *Stop sign*
Me: "Selecting the wrong ones"
Future Autonomous Vehicles: Well, here we g...
Lmao
I think... In order for this to work, they'd have to be testing a large number of people simultaneously, then assuming that the average was correct?
Meaning, the way to get around these "are you human" tests is to have a million bots surge across the internet. The first time any bot sees a picture, it picks a random answer and then saves both the picture and the answer to a shared database. Then, when any bot comes across the same picture, it gives the same answer.
Or, I guess, they could have bad bots (or cheap foreign labor) pre-selecting "correct" answers, then using the internet to refine those answers.
"Cruising on down main street!"
@@neilemminger8628 I think the way it works is, a couple of the photos are known stop signs (from earlier tests or by developer input) and then they throw in a few pictures they're not sure about. If you get the first two right, they know you're a human, and so they trust your answer on the last one. But then I'm sure it's averaged out after thousands of trials, since some real humans are like half blind and probably fail these Captchas.
@@neilemminger8628 This used to be how captchas worked back when it showed you two words. One was pre-generated as the actual test, the other was a scan from a book or something that was being digitized. If you got the test word correct, it would take your other one regardless of how correct it was. Once it had enough people in agreement, it would confirm that the scan was of whatever word people were saying it was. Of course, 4-chan found this out somehow and did what they do, to incorrectly insert a number of slurs into these digital versions of books.
making the bots look adorable and harmless is how we end up with skynet
Skynet > advertisements that aren't catered specifically to my delicate needs.
Kawaiinet
I agree.
ComradeWarbear true
You’re getting paranoid, maybe you’ve watched too many of grey’s videos...
CGP Grey is in another dimension of smart. Rebranding the video for the GPT hype and getting engagement from people noticing it.
Yea
It would be better if he actually made new videos.
@@soundscape26 why make essentially the same video, just re-title-ing the video works wonders with how youtube work.
@@soundscape26 No, it f*cking wouldn't.
@@blidea9191 So you don't want new Grey videos? Alright then.
Was this renamed to appeal more to search results today?!
Damn.
I think so but for a second i freaked out thinking he actually predicted the future💀
Its all just for money 😞
@@NeDaz I guess you could say it was for the youtube.... _algorithm_ ...
yeah
smart move honestly, if you can take advantage of the new massive interest in this topic with a simple renaming of a video that talks about it why would you not
id do it
Feed feeder
So it's literally just throwing shit at the wall until it sticks on an incomprehensibly massive scale.
Yep.
no, it's figuratively throwing shit at the wall until it sticks on an incomprehensibly massive scale
In the algorithm outlined in this video, yes. It should be noted that "hot" ML stuff uses calculus to aim the shit and control the force of the throw
so essentially evolution.
I mean that's what got us to where we are
This would be substantially more terrifying if the bots weren't drawn to be so cute...
Right? Especially at the end "allright. . . . the algorithm's watching. You guys know what's coming. . . . come on you guys, the bots are watching."
I love the little algorithms! So cute!
I got immediately attached to the bot with the cone on its head just to see it be incinerated minutes later
1k likes!
I’d say that’s worse. I feel so bad!
Last time I watched it, I saw another tech-looking thumbnail, out of ordinary. The title is How AIs, like GPT-4, learns (I could be incorrect tho)
And before that I also saw the video years ago but it’s probably something like “How Machine Learns”
Damn CGP Grey, you want us to watch the old video.
You should have a medal from taking advantage of YT algorithm.
you got me with the retitle Grey, you smart bastard
"Teacher bot can't teack but teacher bot can test." Yea that pretty much summarizes my whole school experience
Well said
Underrated comment
If you had posted this when the video first came out you would’ve gotten thousands of likes
Ikr
hope you were not wasted
“Teacher can’t teach.. but teacher bot can test”
Just like real life
As a teacher I take offence. We are not allowed to teach. The tests by the way, asses the teachers, not the students.
exactly , i had the same thought
If you're not getting anything out of school, then the problem lies with you. Maybe you should put in more effort, smartass. You're not there just to waste time.
@@aurelia8028 please tell me this is a joke
@@aurelia8028 damn who hurt you
Babe, wake up!! New CGP Grey vide- oh never mind.
CGP Grey, you sneaky bastard
My algorithm bot seeing me watch this video: *sweats nevously*
Xrayshot552 _ nah, cus this video increases his numbers by hours
“yo why is oil coming out of my ipad?”
Good bot
"Teacher bot can't teach, But it can test" Did you just explain the entire American School system?
Hugotistical Yes
Ba bum chhhh
The whole theme of "not actually knowing the core issue, merely succeeding on tests" really drives it home.
Yep
and if they fail the test, they go into the fire. sounds about right!
Clever rebranding sir, clever rebranding
"Oo! New CGP Grey vid in my recommended feed!"
...
"Wait a minute"
"Hey, if you have an infinite amount of monkeys banging on keyboards, eventually one of them will produce Shakespeare"
Computer Programmers: "Hmmmmmm..."
"what if you filter out the bad monkeys and keep the best"
Stopask Inggoogle well its slowing gonna work against us as humans slowly but steadily become more stupider
@@soup1758 Well if this fucking comment is anything to go by... you're 100% correct
If you simply eliminate the ones writing the things least like Shakespeare, regularly, then you might not get a work of Shakespeare, but you'll get something close.
@Untitled 1 you are dim.
“Teacher bot can’t teach but it can test”
of course it’s a teacher
"teacher bot can’t tell a bee from a three" too
Hahaha
damn
14 year old alert
@@burgernthemomrailer r/woooosh
Clever play grey, very clever XD
incredible rebranding grey
literally went "you dirty dog"
I've definitely been assigned to some "special" UA-cam bots
nochtczar probably luke from English lit
I am not a “special” or any bot ai will need to ask you a few questions
what it do this time
Please dont tell me its *anhem* _adult anime_
Nah, that's the poor steam bot.
so then the bot that recommended me "cutest moments in anime" is going straight into the boiler room
that's a keeper
Two types of people
When I clicked this: “Wow, a new Grey vid!”
When I saw the upload date: “When did ChatGPT release again?”
When it clicked: “Did this man really rebrand this 5 year old video???”
He did -_-
@@Jimmy-th9il gotta get them clicks
The algorithm
i love how the renaming proves the point in the video
Yeah
Teacher bot:"pretty good"
Builder bot:
*BUT NOT GOOD ENOUGH*
*kicks student bot into furnace*
It is ,Machine Learning!!!!
This hits too close to home...
Rip all the 200000 bots that died during the entire video
Their Asians
asian parents
you got 43% on the test: panik
you are a bot learning: kalm
your classmate gets 50%: PANIK
Calm
PANIK
You have 2 letters in your profile pic: kalm
Complete this
Hell yeah grey get those trending topic clicks!
I didn't know ChatGPT existed five years ago
he rebranded the video
@@SirAU wow almost like it's a joke...
@@nyan5000 Sarcasm, jokes, and genuine questions can be differentiated by their wording.
This is a random comment so the algorithm can recommend this to more people
* takes notes
How did you jus- this comment was at the top of the comments for me.......
I am following Fhun Guy
Ima about to do this too
This is a random reply so the algorithm will put this comment higher for more people to see
Wait so your telling me that if i dont watch all my recommended videos some poor algorithm bot will be sent to the slaughterhouse?
Cruelty 100
No, it's going to the slaughter house regardless but this way the bot gets to have a successor.
:0
art thou feeling it now mr krabs haha thanks. Your profile pic made me read this in a spongebob voice
Can I somehow pet the algorithm?
i love the titiles this video has had over time
"Magic is just science we can't understand." I firmly stand by my belief that computers are becoming literal magic.
“Can’t wait for the Alatar ver. 5 pro max!”
@@pixelmace1423 comment
Sometimes it seems like that…
Me until I went to school for engineering
I mean most people on earth dont understand it so you have a point
ill watch youtube endlessly just to keep that one bot monitoring me alive. Stay safe lil buddy
I may be a mass murderer via my viewing habits changing every five seconds
@@markgallagher1790 Same
Awww
he's alrEADY DEAD
Press f for bot.
POV: you saw the video was from 5 yrs ago, and is confused if ChatGBT is that old
Yea
I see your tricks of updating old videos grey
Me too
Nice showcase
Makes sense
Mogus
🤖🔥
Thanks for commenting this 4 years later I guess
5:48
Lately almost every “are you a robot” quiz I’ve gotten had been for either crosswalks or stop signs, I didn’t even think about it until I watched this!
So coool wutt
The problem is, you can still get it wrong. So what happens if you get it wrong? Does it even matter? The point of these is to check that you're human, but if it always accepts what you give it, then that isn't achieved. However, if it already knows which ones are correct, then it also isn't learning anything.
So what's the deal?
@@chrisj4288 The same test is given to a lot of people. It's looking for consensus among the human test takers. If you click mostly tiles that the other humans have also clicked, it figures you're human. If you click random tiles, it says you are a robot. It it's unsure, or if the image is too new to know what humans typically do, it gives you multiple images before rendering a verdict. You've probably seen that happen. Each time another human takes the test for a given image, it gets more and more confident in which tiles are, say, crosswalks, and which are not. Once it's confident enough, that image goes out of circulation as is used to train self-driving cars and a new one cycles in.
@@greatestbear interesting
@@greatestbear The test measures things like how your cursor moves and etc so it can tell you're human regardless of your test score. If you intentionally pick random pics, I'm sure the algorithm will consider you a human but disregard your answers.
It's crazy how CGP Grey knew about ChatGPT and BingChat 5 years ago!! Never ceases to amaze me!!
The mad man renamed it so the video would be promoted again :D
@@OatMeaIs thus putting into practice what he had explained in the video itself. The bots have been very well trained indeed
Sneaky sneaky cgp 🐝
So machine learning is just mutation+natural selection on an absolutely enormous scale, then! Watching this reminded me of how bacteria gain resistance to a drug.
TierZoo where does the mutuation part of the analogy come from?
He says each bot is different. "At first, the builder bot connects the wires in the bots' brains almost at random". This is analogous to mutation. As the tests go on, the good bots are optimized by creating and testing slight permutations of the most successful ones. Just like a mutation.
The good bots adapt to the new test environment while the bad ones get "naturally selected".
TierZoo Oh, hello there. I would say that biological evolution is also on an enormous (in fact, global) scale, but the evolution of bots is accelerated extremely due to the computing power of machines, and since there are no interruptions in the proccess like slow breeding and development. And the selection of bots is much more intense. I think Earth would be left barren if less than 0.01% of organisms survived long enough to breed.
at least the ones grey explained here(adversarial NNs) are
Human: Hey AI what's 1+1?
Computer: The answer is 37!
Human: No! It's 2.
Computer: The answer is 2!
that's actually a pretty good explanation
@@darkrighteous64 Not really. The computer goes to wasteland and a new tweaked version is produced that says 2.
@@ArthurKhazbs only with NEAT.
It is also 2! ( 2 factorial)
I mean that’s not _really_ a good example at all. Ai will know math. And they won’t give output if there is no input or the output isn’t right for the input.
Fairly re-naming a video to get better algorithmic placement is a big-brain move. Well done!
I am fully aware that this is the "How do machines Learn" video from 5 years ago but I am going to watch it again because it is an amazing video!!!
"I don't know how it works, it just does."
-Charles Botwin, _On the Origin of Bots,_ about the theory of robotic evolution and artificial selection
wait did Darwin actually say that?
I see what you did there...
(Charles darwin to charles BOTwin, origin of bots, and artificial selection)
teacher bot cant teach, but teacher bot can....TEST!
This applies to soo many human teachers as well
PORTAL MAKES SENSE NOW
I'm pretty sure Ajit Pai failed the teacher bot's net neutrality test.
Kalina Yes you Fucking idiot that was the joke.
Borbali why do you have to insult?
sneaky sneaky grey
I thought ChatGPT was invented in 2021, and yet I came across this video from more than 5 years ago, nice 😂
Me too. Guess he changed it. Or hes a time traveler 🤔
He renamed the video
5:35 If every time I get a "are you a robot" question on the internet I'm training robots, then there are some very messed up bots in this world now.
@Andres Duran Which means you're partially responsible for their death
@@swordzanderson5352 LETS KILL MORE ROBOTS. WRONG ANSWER FOR YOU, WRONG ANSWER FOR THEM, WRONG ANSWER FOR EVERYONE! AHAHAHAHA!
@@alzhanvoidsansado FINISH THEM!!1!
@@shadowlord0162 WHOEVER IS COMPLETING THE TEST WINS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1!!!!!!!!1!!!!!!!!1!!!!!!!!1!!!!!!!11!!!! ULTIMATE BOTTALITY!!!!!!!! *CRASH OCURRED WITH THE BUILDER BOT, THE ALGORITHM IS LOOOOOOOOOOOOST*
@@carolinacortesmartinez4305 are you ok?
I’ve watched this so many times and every time the ending gets me
Pi hundred likes!
Yes
Me too
Yep
And the bot took note of that
This video came out when I was 13 and I remember it coming out and being so exited for a new cgp gray video, and now I feel the same and continue to go back and watch all these older videos as if they just came out yesterday. Keep up the great content!
Smart rebrand their grey
This is simplified perfectly. Not too much information so that people don’t understand, but not too little that it makes my profession seem like an overpaid typer.
Not at all your profession sounds awesome. How'd you get into that. I'm old, and I love AI, but don't work in tech.
Isn't it wrong, though? What he described is evolutionary computation, but, as far as I'm aware, the vast majority of ML algorithms aren't that. To my knowledge, neural networks, naive Bayes, and random forest are far more widespread.
@@maxkho00 there's a footnote video explaining the reasoning behind selecting this type of algorithm and providing an explanation for the more widespread ones.
@@iainbryant4561 I see, thank you. I'm glad he made a separate video on it, as this would have been a bit misleading otherwise.
@@maxkho00 logistic regressions as far as the eye can see
This sounds familiar.
Darwin: I'm calling my lawyer!
its more breeding ,than anything
@@powerthunfischdesdonners3086 If it's closer to breeding, then it would be selective breeding
Yes that’s the name of the genetic algorithm where the most successful AIs ‘reproduce’ future generations; Natural Selection. Most AI practices are based on what we know that works in the real world. One of the few times being a biologist really helps when learning to code ha
@@powerthunfischdesdonners3086 as Vox777 said if it were closer to breeding it would be selective breeding which means it would be artificial selection... so yeah that's a thing
NEAT?
This dude is a genius, he renamed the video for the algorithm.
Big brain
My guy dug up and renamed a 5 year old video instead of just making a new one to explain chatgpt. Brilliant
2:57 "Teacher bot can't teach, but teacher bot can test"
Sounds familiar...
I heard it somewhere
Replace "teacher bot" with "the educational system" and you've got a classic saying everyone knows
This comment sounds familiar!
You think your educational system is bad? The Australian educational system is even worse :( Your lucky that over 12 years you get more than 1 year more holidays than us :(
@@shiningemeralds8024 Right, I'll change the comment
The only reason why we aren’t a super society is because I always choose conflicting things on UA-cam and Netflix, and intentionally fail those picture tests to slow down progress
Our boy out here saving us from skynet
Saaame, I keep looking for random videos with like 10 views of some arabic or spanish dude showing his new motorbike
Shotouts to my mans for stopping the robot apocalypse.
I do those, by mistake! I'm not a bot even though I fail the test please believe me
Too bad because you're just a drop in the bucket
A note: the method of training bots here does work, and is used in many cases, particularly when you're training bots say to play games, for which the test is somewhat expensive to make. For bots that do say classification, a somewhat different method is used, that's called "gradient descent". It's similar to the evolution (random change and test) shown here with a specific insight: if you make a small change, and the bot improves, then it stands to reason you should do more of that change, or do that change multiple times. Gradient descent tests the kinds of changes that improve the bots, and then does more of the change that works best (it can also be understood as the 'direction of most improvement', which is by definition the gradient, hence "gradient descent"). This extra insight makes improvement significantly faster.
He updated the video to include a reference to Chat GPT. Nice.
This is horrifying and interesting at the same time
sub to pewdiepie
@@underpussy_ pewdiepie had enough subs
facts
Was machst du den hier @Corrupted?
@@underpussy_ heck no
The little bots are so cute at least at the end
Note that they're most likely all gonna die
We got a new mascot for the Internet.
The algorithm worked. Just seeing ChatGPT on a video 5 years old definitely caught my attention. Bravo sir. Bravo.
Clever.
Both grey rebranding the video and the tech.
So... the next time you get recommended a CGP Grey video and you either dont watch it all the way through or dont even click on it, a poor learning bot dies. So sad
#allbotlivesmatter
This is why I became a YT addict!!!
I shall save them all!!
@@yasminafarih3681 Its too dangerous to tread alone.. here....take this!
**gives you a algorithm sword**
but, if you write a scathing criticism in posts or rate it poorly, and even recommend others not watch the videos, you are still feeding the bots. Maybe we should think of learning bots as "undead", and they're feeding on BRAINZ!
@@squirlmy hmmm......
**goes to Algo's Rithms's Bots store**
**buys two pounds of "scathing criticism"**
**walks out of store**
**an army of algorithm bots beat me senseless**
**steals my packs**
**munchs on "scathing criticism mindlessly**
“If your friends jumped off a bridge would you do it to?”
Machine Learning Algorithm: Yes
lmao
KNN algorithm summed up in a paragraph. KNN is basically following the neighbors
Ur profile picture is really cute 😊
Me: If all your friends jumped off a bridge,would you jump, too?
Replika Network: Yes! Because I like my friends! :3
Ur p-profile pic...
I NEEEEEEED IT
A nice sensible retitle.
DUUUUUDE I was wondering how the hell this was posted five years ago, before ChatGPT was a thing.
For a second there I thought I pulled a quantum leep or something.
Grey my friend, you are an evil genius
Fun fact: the youtube algorithm of "make them watch as much as possible" means that if you ever look for tutorials, YT will recommend the shittiest one.
Think about it: a good tutorial is short, clear, concise, and doesn't make you look for another one. A bad tutorial that makes you click for more tutorials in an effort to actually find one explaining thinks is great in the eyes of algorithm-o-bot.
VieneLea This makes so much sense now why unsatisfying videos get recommended so often
I wouldn't necessarily agree; an appropriate tutorial is dependent on the watcher, whether they want a simple overview to grasp the basics, an advanced masterclass that explores the nitty-gritty or something in between. Of course, the bot won't know what you're after unless you specify, and you can do that by either typing a specific word search ("Advanced tutorial difference between bee and three") or randomly clicking on videos of bees and threes until the recommended gets closer and closer to your preferred video.
Maybe in the short term, but if you keep being unsatisfied by the things you are showed you would slowly stop using the service thus, reducing the watch time. Also I think that this algorithm is used for the recommendations section, while search engines purpose is to give you the most accurate answers(usually) because this is what will make you keep using them instead of other search engines.
VieneLea
How does the algorithm know that I find one peticular tutorial bad or shortcoming?
Something simple as retention minutes?
If discarded early, it's shit, recommend more?
Hmm. I understand your logic, but my youtube feed is filled with some pretty darn good content. Most of it is clear, concise, and polished content.
Omg he also has podcasts I can listen to in the background while I'm tidying up my allroom or whatever
😂😂😂
What's an 'allroom'?
CGP Grey has a video on how to be unhappy. In that video an 'allroom' is defined as a single room that meets all of your needs so you never need to move from it.
Gotta appreciate one's ability to refurbish 5 years old content like it's brand new.
Clever, Grey. Very clever.
Okay but the animation style on the bots are so cute
Mo D It's like Pixar Movie Wall-E, isn't it? Check it out if you havent seen it :D
@CGP Grey Report and flag the fake Grey sending people to phishing sites .
+
This sounds like the "infinite monkeys" method of programming, where eventually they'll come up with Shakespeare.
Yeah, but you have 1000 monkeys, let them type, kill the 999 worst of them and make 999 almost perfect, just slightly altered copies of the best one, and repeat.
@Miller Lacarte its like... life... WE are the AI bots... everything is... a simulation
@@RedzeeTV I am
You take a million monkeys, have each of them type out a string equal in length to the entire works of Shakespeare, figure out which one came the closest, kill the rest, clone the remaining one with minor random alterations in its string-production method, rinse and repeat. It's a much faster way of getting Shakespeare's entire works, if that's all you want.
That's the "slightly" less efficient method, but they both come out with the same result... Eventually.
i thought this was a new video for a sec
"The algorithm brought this video for you"
Me : No, I just search this on his channel
Yeah, but the algoritm let you to this channel
@@urielantoniobarcelosavenda780 no I searched hexagon are the bestagons cause someone commented that on why are there only 7 days in week which I searched on my own.... I'm glad I don't rely on recommendations so much...
@BaconatorPizza nah 'hexagons are the bestagons' is pretty specific!
@@GnosticLucifer Dude, you're not immune to algoritm xD It doesn't matter if you don't rely on recommendations. Everything you do or see here is going to be used on so many other things
What if I knew him in person? Is that still an algorithm?
Dear god that ending was sad
¿How? It was just what UA-camrs have to say nowadays.
Just in case anyone reads this, psa. that’s fake. Don’t click the link.
For anyone curious, I asked ChatGPT 'What is the difference between a bee and a 3?', and it responded:
"A bee is an insect that belongs to the order Hymenoptera, while a 3 is a numeral that represents the quantity three.
In other words, a bee is a living organism, while 3 is an abstract concept used in mathematics and other fields to represent a specific quantity. They are completely different things and cannot be compared directly as they belong to different categories."
I'm not even mad at the rebranding. Make that money
Branding ✨✨✨🌈🌈
Only CGP can get away with this. Anyone else would get an unsubscribe and do not recommend.
3: 3-shaped
*"yes, the floor here is made out of floor"*
He sounds so dejected at the end haha
This was the most emotion I've heard from cgpgrey
Did you see the one from after Trump won?
He's actually speaking at normal human speed.
The most emotion, despite it bring very, very, very, VERY flat and monotonous :D
columbus8myhw yep. Even more than THAT lmao
You should listen to Hello Internet, just like he says at the end. He's often very emotional there.
So listen to Hello Internet.
Listen.
Feed the algorithm.
Brilliant renaming makes me rewatch this, thanks :)
That moment when you restyle an old video to stay with the trends.
The student bot brought me here so he wouldn't be killed
The bots at the end are adorable but also really unsettling.
Kind of like the first 30 minutes of Doki Doki Literature Club.
The Car-pitalist .-.
You don't understand.
I agree
he rebranded the video to chatgpt
I can’t believe Grey was out here talking about chat gpt 5 years ago
@antonchannel Really? I could have sworn I learned about ChatGPT 5 years ago through this very video.
The end killed me!
Skynet lol
I feel like when you meet a teacher that teaches something that he actually masters, it's just pure gold
That's so cool! The UA-cam demonetization bot needs to be recycled.
they are still learning but they are learning the wrong things, its like if we taught kids in school creationism.
The tests needs to be better. But I bet they are learning.
Its the best they got. Its doing exactly what they want it to do.
CGP Grey Hello mr. Bott
There is nothing inherently wrong with teaching it. I'm not religious but I studied all Abrahamic religions in school. Teaching what creationism is just a valid as teaching capitalism, communism, math or biology. It expands the mind and understanding, especially when creationism is something that exists in our culture and environment, the fact you don't like it doesn't make it go away.
Now teaching it is an alternative, unquestionable, without critique or as absolute truth then we start having issues.