Several sequences shown here are not multiplane - just straight camera pans and truck-ins. The multiplane effect is caused by different levels of artwork shifting during a camera move. Two of Disney's most famous multiplane scenes aren't included: the village morning shot trucking down into Gepetto's cottage in "Pinocchio", and Peter Pan's flight over night-time London. Multiplane is an effect that was mind-bogglingly difficult to achieve on film, and is now a snap to achieve digitally.
Also the "Baia" song sequence from _Three Caballeros._ That sequence almost looks like it was done in live action, until you see the animated doves. And most of the "multiplane" shots done after _Mermaid_ were simulations done on the CAPS program.
The Hunchback of Notre Dame is digital multiplane... or simply parallax. the little mermaid is the last disney movie that used the physical multiplane...
Even now uses digital but I believe they won't leave the inspiration from multiplane camera. Today they use digital layers, and I think multiplane camera opens the idea about what we call now as "Layers".
Pinocchio had a better scene with multi-plane then the one used here and maybe one of the best multi-plane shots ever panning down from the bell into Gepettos cottage. A REAL multi-plane shot unlike the digital effects of today. These r the innovations that made Walt Disney, even tho many artist thought of concepts like this before ever learning Disney did this almost 100 years ago.
Thanks for all the comments. Many point out, that not all intros are real multiplane. Yes, that was the point of the video, as written in the description. To compare the narrative idea of a long zoom-in an the technical realisation. Some had no budget for a multiplane, some are made digitally. The use of "sucking in" the viewer is still the same. All of Disneys Highs and Lows can be seen in these examples. To be honest, i just compiled this in my college-days for a short presentation. Now i ask myself, why i did not include "Fantasia". Maybe it was too long? i dont remember. I am sorry, that i cannot just update the video to correct the omissions and mistakes.
Animation software like Moho also makes use of multi planes and caps. EDIT: I noticed that "Coast of Ireland" is mistranslated from the Norse text. I'm amazed that Milo Thatch caught that.
I liked Max Flieschers Stereoscopic process better than Disney s multiplane camera because the background looked realistic and was amazing at the time check out Popeye vs Sinbad to see what I mean
Many of these are too subtle, perhaps trying to be as seamless as possible. The multiplanar technique can be a powerful visual experience in itself, which is why I generally prefer the earlier version developed by the Fleischers called the Stereoptical technique. Both studios were a bit parsimonious with the costly process, but the Fleischers' cartoons were generally more dramatic in my opinion.
Also, technically wouldn't all the scenes from "Rescuers Down Under" forward not be multiplane at all, but rather computer simulations? After all, from 1990 onwards all the Disney features were colored and composited digitally, removing the traditional camera setup from the process. My understanding is that those "multiplane" shots were created by scanning artwork into the computer and compositing the shots in a way that imitated the multiplane camera without actually using it.
I know that from The Rescuers Down Under the shots are made with the computer. Although the traditional camera isn't used since then, the effect can be seen as 'multiplane'. Another thing asked to the user of this video, do you know that The Old Mill is not a Merry Melody, but a Silly Symphony? Merry Melodies are the names of movies from Warner Bros.
in many of those scenes you can t really see the use of the multiplane( for example peter pan, lady and the trump and the aristocats) and...I think you forgot sleeping beauty..buy vthe way nice video...
When they dolly in, are they moving the panes closer to the camera at varying speeds and depths or are they pushing the camera toward the panes that are stationary at different depths?
A simple example is the moon. Put the moon on an fixed panel. Then move other planes, possibly at varying rates. The moon doesn't move, as it shouldn't. Not sure if the camera moves or not, but the main idea is independently moving planes.
Charlotte "Lotte" Reiniger (2 June 1899 - 19 June 1981) made her own cartoons using silhouttes and invented the first multi-plane camera. Disney subsequently adapted and improved upon on it.
@@waynejamel6703 As art imitates life the multiplayer Camera helps seal and convey the animation in to a realm of believability and it further helps catapult the illusion of 2D animation into its most beautiful forms of realism to which the imagination can concoct.
+Gideon Sure you can, just like you can disagree on a fact.That doesn't make you correct or incorrect, just disagreeing over whether or not a fact is factual or not.
The old era of Disney did it SO MUCH better. Miss these days of animation with the multiplane camera
Several sequences shown here are not multiplane - just straight camera pans and truck-ins. The multiplane effect is caused by different levels of artwork shifting during a camera move. Two of Disney's most famous multiplane scenes aren't included: the village morning shot trucking down into Gepetto's cottage in "Pinocchio", and Peter Pan's flight over night-time London. Multiplane is an effect that was mind-bogglingly difficult to achieve on film, and is now a snap to achieve digitally.
So where should this video have ended?
This is explained in the description.
Also the "Baia" song sequence from _Three Caballeros._ That sequence almost looks like it was done in live action, until you see the animated doves. And most of the "multiplane" shots done after _Mermaid_ were simulations done on the CAPS program.
Some of these look more like ordinary zooms without multiplane, but thanks for the compilation!
Old is gold. I want to live back in those days.
Despite there not being computers, Disney’s sense of three dimensions has never gone out the window, even with just the xerox animation.
The Hunchback of Notre Dame is digital multiplane... or simply parallax. the little mermaid is the last disney movie that used the physical multiplane...
Parallax, or what often called in Adobe applications as "Layers".
This is an awesome compilation. But it would have been infinitely more awesome with sound!
Even now uses digital but I believe they won't leave the inspiration from multiplane camera. Today they use digital layers, and I think multiplane camera opens the idea about what we call now as "Layers".
The MUltiplane Camera is amazing and im working on one right now
Sleeping Beauty had some great multiplane sequences in the forests, and they are not shown here...
10:29 is pretty amazing.
Pinocchio had a better scene with multi-plane then the one used here and maybe one of the best multi-plane shots ever panning down from the bell into Gepettos cottage. A REAL multi-plane shot unlike the digital effects of today. These r the innovations that made Walt Disney, even tho many artist thought of concepts like this before ever learning Disney did this almost 100 years ago.
Nowadays, Disney'll hardly touch 2D animation, much leas hand drawn/painted
The old Disney feel
Thanks for all the comments. Many point out, that not all intros are real multiplane. Yes, that was the point of the video, as written in the description.
To compare the narrative idea of a long zoom-in an the technical realisation. Some had no budget for a multiplane, some are made digitally. The use of "sucking in" the viewer is still the same. All of Disneys Highs and Lows can be seen in these examples.
To be honest, i just compiled this in my college-days for a short presentation. Now i ask myself, why i did not include "Fantasia". Maybe it was too long? i dont remember. I am sorry, that i cannot just update the video to correct the omissions and mistakes.
Multiplane camera opened the idea for digital imaging applications about what we call now as "Layers".
Most striking multi-plane shot of "Fantasia" was during Ave Maria.
Were there any other studies that used this technique?
I Love Disney Movies!
Animation software like Moho also makes use of multi planes and caps.
EDIT: I noticed that "Coast of Ireland" is mistranslated from the Norse text. I'm amazed that Milo Thatch caught that.
I liked Max Flieschers Stereoscopic process better than Disney s multiplane camera because the background looked realistic and was amazing at the time check out Popeye vs Sinbad to see what I mean
Lady and Tramp is one of several movies, which didn't used multiplane at all.
Many of these are too subtle, perhaps trying to be as seamless as possible. The multiplanar technique can be a powerful visual experience in itself, which is why I generally prefer the earlier version developed by the Fleischers called the Stereoptical technique. Both studios were a bit parsimonious with the costly process, but the Fleischers' cartoons were generally more dramatic in my opinion.
Also, technically wouldn't all the scenes from "Rescuers Down Under" forward not be multiplane at all, but rather computer simulations? After all, from 1990 onwards all the Disney features were colored and composited digitally, removing the traditional camera setup from the process. My understanding is that those "multiplane" shots were created by scanning artwork into the computer and compositing the shots in a way that imitated the multiplane camera without actually using it.
I know that from The Rescuers Down Under the shots are made with the computer. Although the traditional camera isn't used since then, the effect can be seen as 'multiplane'.
Another thing asked to the user of this video, do you know that The Old Mill is not a Merry Melody, but a Silly Symphony? Merry Melodies are the names of movies from Warner Bros.
You are right of course, i corrected the description.
the video could have used some background music
How did they make this effect without computers? I mean... scene transitions soflty.?
who is the genius, who decided to remove sound from this movie?
The genius afraid of facing a copyright strike from disney.
@@defski
Doesn’t mean the video had to be completely silent.
in many of those scenes you can t really see the use of the multiplane( for example peter pan, lady and the trump and the aristocats) and...I think you forgot sleeping beauty..buy vthe way nice video...
No sound?
Interesting Stuff.
The movies after Snow White where they're not using it are the ones where they're just cashing in.
When they dolly in, are they moving the panes closer to the camera at varying speeds and depths or are they pushing the camera toward the panes that are stationary at different depths?
A simple example is the moon. Put the moon on an fixed panel. Then move
other planes, possibly at varying rates. The moon doesn't move, as it shouldn't. Not sure if the camera moves or not, but the main idea is independently moving planes.
I was waiting for that scene with Snow White crying in the woods. :v
Los equipos de Rescate por debajo en vivo por acción.
Charlotte "Lotte" Reiniger (2 June 1899 - 19 June 1981) made her own cartoons using silhouttes and invented the first multi-plane camera. Disney subsequently adapted and improved upon on it.
Weren't "The Little Mermaid" the last movie that the Multiplane Camera was used on
? After that they digitized the effect.
You can kind of tell the difference. The hand held one was a little smoother. The human touch had more control
@@waynejamel6703 As art imitates life the multiplayer Camera helps seal and convey the animation in to a realm of believability and it further helps catapult the illusion of 2D animation into its most beautiful forms of realism to which the imagination can concoct.
Back when there were artists and talent instead of the crappy pixar looking clones we have today.
Año 2010 pero 1970 Japón. Y será el Blu-Ray y digital hd en 2020. Música clásica en los violentos gráficos adultos acciones.
Los rescatadores por debajo en 2010 sólo en Telecine.
About half of these are not multiplane at all, they are just zooms and pans on flat artwork. Hopeless.
Yes, it says in the description.
Aladdin was released in 1992, not 1994.
I agree
+Tracy Perkins you can't agree on a fact
+Gideon Sure you can, just like you can disagree on a fact.That doesn't make you correct or incorrect, just disagreeing over whether or not a fact is factual or not.
Oops, thanks. But YT does not allow to update a movie. Sorry.
@@GamingPenis Something being a fact has nothing to do with others' agreeing to it. Lmao.
ABC Entertainment 2010.
aladdin 1992
2009 Movies
Such a shame. Disney used to make art. Now it's pure garbage.
NO MULTIPLAIN!!11
What 😐
No sound, boring!
But i think you made some Mistakes.