accurate, there is no end to how small things can get as everything needs to be made of something. Like our known universe being on an atom of a giant.
There is no such thing as smallest particle or thing. There is an infinite number of smaller things. Those awarded Nobel prize can continue to get prizes as long as enough energy is available to smash particles together. This can be done infinitely
@@enjupelafille4681 agree. Maybe yes is as good as maybe no, made possible by the art of language which inherently is ambiguous and this affects the communication for science
I find it difficult to conceptualize something that all things are conditioned by, something that MUST exist in order for other things to be able to manifest their existence in nature and form reality as we sense and experience it. A "something" so fundamentally present, and which by virtue of its own existence, gives all other things in the universe an essence or identity, whose inherent properties represent reality itself and convey a deeper understanding of the meaning of existence in human consciousness.
Here’s an insane theory I could imagine. What if there is no end to the perception of how small something can become because at a certain point it folds back in on itself like a mini black hole and goes back out like a negative. Meaning once you reach a certain point you’ll see the entire universe and zoom right back into the singular point you’re looking at over and over. Which would mean there is no actual scale to anything just a perspective based on which point within that spectrum you exist in. 🤔
r[m] = (htrans/c).(1/m[kg]) and for the mass of the universe ~1E54 [kg] it is r~1E-97 [m] in the case of BigCrunch. The smallest conceivable size (for this mass). Prefer to use the SI system and this form of numerical expression. Otherwise you are confusing the reader.
I bet just as the universe is vast its the same way in opposite direction. I say particles keep getting smaller that it will take millions of years to reach the smallest
accurate, there is no end to how small things can get as everything needs to be made of something. Like our known universe being on an atom of a giant.
There is no such thing as smallest particle or thing. There is an infinite number of smaller things. Those awarded Nobel prize can continue to get prizes as long as enough energy is available to smash particles together. This can be done infinitely
May or may not be.Opinion is never a fact. No one knows yet ;)
@@enjupelafille4681 agree. Maybe yes is as good as maybe no, made possible by the art of language which inherently is ambiguous and this affects the communication for science
Somebody and this chap(ette) a Noble.
I find it difficult to conceptualize something that all things are conditioned by, something that MUST exist in order for other things to be able to manifest their existence in nature and form reality as we sense and experience it. A "something" so fundamentally present, and which by virtue of its own existence, gives all other things in the universe an essence or identity, whose inherent properties represent reality itself and convey a deeper understanding of the meaning of existence in human consciousness.
WOAH I never knew this, Your so underrated
Amazing content😍
Probably not billions of sand grains in a standard sand castle. Maybe that many on the beach.
Here’s an insane theory I could imagine. What if there is no end to the perception of how small something can become because at a certain point it folds back in on itself like a mini black hole and goes back out like a negative. Meaning once you reach a certain point you’ll see the entire universe and zoom right back into the singular point you’re looking at over and over. Which would mean there is no actual scale to anything just a perspective based on which point within that spectrum you exist in. 🤔
There are no fundamental particles. A particle becomes empty space over time. We are made of energy.
Why didn't u mention about the String theory??
For what purpose? 🤔
If u didn't understand we still don't know a "size" of electrons/quarks just (not bad) approximation.
"String Theory" would require It's own video
r[m] =
(htrans/c).(1/m[kg])
and for the mass of the universe ~1E54 [kg] it is r~1E-97 [m] in the case of BigCrunch. The smallest conceivable size (for this mass).
Prefer to use the SI system and this form of numerical expression. Otherwise you are confusing the reader.
So a positive charged proton may same as our sun?
I bet just as the universe is vast its the same way in opposite direction. I say particles keep getting smaller that it will take millions of years to reach the smallest
Agreed, the journey into the tiny might be as vast as the cosmos itself.
Could there be proton planets that have life on them?
Do you think it ends with us? We are the proton planet.
Actually, the next is the molecule, and then the atom
Everything is infinite, there is always a smaller than smaller of smaller atom particle or whatsoever,
It is said the most powerful thing is the "thought", someone explain endless imaginative whatever that appears in our thoughts/dreams?
Kamala's brain.
My attention span.
@@John-vz5un You never met my wife...
Who?
call inventor , discoverer or thief...