How Far Beyond Earth Could Humanity Spread?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 10 лют 2025
  • Check Out Untold Earth on PBS Terra: • Redwoods Shouldn't Be ...
    PBS Member Stations rely on viewers like you. To support your local station, go to:to.pbs.org/Dona...
    Sign Up on Patreon to get access to the Space Time Discord!
    / pbsspacetime
    We humans have always been explorers. The great civilizations that have arisen across the world are owed to our restless ancestors. These days, there’s not much of Earth left to explore. But if we look up, there’s a whole universe out there waiting for us. Future generations may one day explore the cosmos and even settle entire other galaxies. But there is a hard limit to how much of the universe we can expand into. So, how big can humanity get?
    Episodes Referenced:
    How Much Of The Universe Can Humanity Ever See?: • How Much Of The Univer...
    Is Interstellar Travel Possible?: • Is Interstellar Travel...
    What If Humanity Is Among The First Spacefaring Civilizations?: • What If Humanity Is Am...
    The Edges of Our Universe by Toby Ord: arxiv.org/pdf/...
    A causal limit to communication within an expanding cosmological civilization by S. Jay Olson: arxiv.org/pdf/...
    Check out the Space Time Merch Store
    www.pbsspaceti...
    Sign up for the mailing list to get episode notifications and hear special announcements!
    mailchi.mp/1a6...
    Search the Entire Space Time Library Here: search.pbsspac...
    Hosted by Matt O'Dowd
    Written by Euan McLean & Matt O'Dowd
    Post Production by Leonardo Scholzer, Yago Ballarini, Pedro Osinski, Caique Oliveira, Adriano Leal & Stephanie Faria
    Directed by Andrew Kornhaber
    Associate Producer: Bahar Gholipour
    Executive Producers: Eric Brown & Andrew Kornhaber
    Executive in Charge for PBS: Maribel Lopez
    Director of Programming for PBS: Gabrielle Ewing
    Assistant Director of Programming for PBS: John Campbell
    Spacetime is produced by Kornhaber Brown for PBS Digital Studios.
    This program is produced by Kornhaber Brown, which is solely responsible for its content.
    © 2023 PBS. All rights reserved.
    #EarthMonthPBS #space #spacetravel
    End Credits Music by J.R.S. Schattenberg: / multidroideka
    Space Time Was Made Possible In Part By:
    Big Bang Sponsors:
    Ian Jones
    Bryce Fort
    Peter Barrett
    David Neumann
    Sean Maddox
    Alexander Tamas
    Morgan Hough
    Juan Benet
    Vinnie Falco
    Fabrice Eap
    Mark Rosenthal
    Daniel Muzquiz
    Quasar Sponsors
    Glenn Sugden
    Alex Kern
    Ethan Cohen
    Stephen Wilcox
    Christina Oegren
    Mark Heising
    Hypernova Sponsors
    Vyce Ailour
    Zachary Wilson
    Kenneth See
    Gregory Forfa
    Kirk Honour
    Joe Moreira
    Bradley Voorhees
    Marc Armstrong
    Scott Gorlick
    Paul Stehr-Green
    Ben Delo
    Scott Gray
    Антон Кочков
    John R. Slavik
    Donal Botkin
    John Pollock
    Edmund Fokschaner
    chuck zegar
    Jordan Young
    Gamma Ray Burst Sponsors
    Matthew Oldfield
    Lucas Kazakevicius
    Massimiliano Pala
    Thomas Nielson
    Joe Pavlovic
    Ryan McGaughy
    Mark West
    Chuck Lukaszewski
    Edward Hodapp
    Cole Combs
    D. Delair
    Andrea Galvagni
    Jerry Thomas
    Nikhil Sharma
    Ryan Moser
    Jonathan Cordovano
    John Anderson
    David Giltinan
    Scott Hannum
    Paul Widden
    Bradley Ulis
    Craig Falls
    Kane Holbrook
    John Yaraee
    Ross Story
    teng guo
    Mason Dillon
    Matt Langford
    Harsh Khandhadia
    Thomas Tarler
    Susan Albee
    Frank Walker
    Matt Quinn
    Michael Lev
    Terje Vold
    James Trimmier
    Andre Stechert
    Paul Wood
    Kent Durham
    jim bartosh
    Ramon Nogueira
    Paul Suchy
    Ellis Hall
    John H. Austin, Jr.
    Diana S Poljar
    Faraz Khan
    Almog Cohen
    Alex Edwards
    Daniel Jennings
    Cameron Sampson
    Russ Creech
    Jeremy Reed
    David Johnston
    Michael Barton
    Andrew Mann
    Isaac Suttell
    Bleys Goodson
    Robert Walter
    Yury Kitaev
    Mirik Gogri
    Mark Delagasse
    Mark Daniel Cohen
    Nickolas Andrew Freeman
    Shane Calimlim
    Tybie Fitzhugh
    Robert Ilardi
    Eric Kiebler
    Craig Stonaha
    Graydon Goss
    Frederic Simon
    Dmitri McGuiness
    John Robinson
    Jim Hudson
    David Barnholdt
    David Neal
    John Funai
    Bradley Jenkins
    Cody Brumfield
    Thomas Dougherty
    Dan Warren
    Patrick Sutton
    John Griffith
    Dean Faulk

КОМЕНТАРІ • 3 тис.

  • @freelancer42
    @freelancer42 Рік тому +1969

    It's funny how you weren't planning on ever visiting that galaxy 100 billion light years away, but when science says you can't it's suddenly all you've ever wanted. So weird how these limits are still unfathomably huge, but still feel depressingly small when you realize they might be absolute limits of travel for the entirety of forever.

    • @physics_hacker
      @physics_hacker Рік тому +168

      Knowing humanity, just being denied the ability to travel somewhere we can see will just guarantee we do whatever it takes to get there, even doing the previously-thought-impossible like FTL.

    • @richardconway6425
      @richardconway6425 Рік тому +70

      Speak for yourself! I was planning to go actually. Until all of this Hubble-bubble-toil-and-trouble brewed up. Oh well. Physicists, astronomers, cosmologists.... who needs 'em?

    • @richardconway6425
      @richardconway6425 Рік тому +61

      "... for the entirety of forever"
      I like that.

    • @ZenStrive52
      @ZenStrive52 Рік тому +12

      Accepting challenges and developing genes to surmount that challenges is how life works. Imagine billions of cells in humanity creating emerging drive to conquer space based on those priniciples alone,

    • @SolidSiren
      @SolidSiren Рік тому +35

      100 billion light years? Bro. That's the current size of the observable universe.
      It shouldn't seem small to you under any circumstance. We cannot begin to even imagine half of half of half of half of half of half of half of half that distance.
      A *single light year* is 6 TRILLION miles. Do you know how far a trillion miles is? Now multiply that by 100 *billion*.
      That is not small compared to anything we can understand, and our perspective and size truly is the context here, no other perspective matters. We are the size we are.

  • @dylancurbjumper
    @dylancurbjumper Рік тому +340

    One of the biggest things I drew from this episode, that I've never really put much thought into, is that the speed in which we expand from Earth ultimately reduces the amount of communication we can have with it (same for any origin point).

    • @bretscofield
      @bretscofield Рік тому +21

      Yeah, until Star Trek's subspace is found!

    • @TheClintonio
      @TheClintonio Рік тому +59

      Yes, it's almost a guarantee that if we can't figure out FLT communication then any future civilisations in different star systems and galaxies will be completely independent and not a part of some galactic/universal empire.

    • @richardvivian3665
      @richardvivian3665 Рік тому +26

      Only because we have n’t figured out how to move faster than light.
      Everything we think is immutable always dissolves. Light speed may be hard to crack but we really don’t know anything at this point. We’ve only be a “technological” civilization for a nano second as far as the universe is concerned.
      We are a single cell civilization at best

    • @suspect794
      @suspect794 Рік тому +17

      unless we can use Quantum Entanglement for communication in the future, then, regardless of our speed or where the end point user is, we should be able to instantly communicate

    • @ccelik97
      @ccelik97 Рік тому +6

      @@richardvivian3665I hope you're correct about the _"Everything we think is immutable always dissolves."_ bit.
      Until relatively (which is just a *blink* before us within _"nano second as far as the universe is concerned"_ period) the humanity has been living as city-states, with the hopes for a given person traveling beyond the visible mountain ranges were slim.
      In contrast to that, we can finally travel much further than that, now with the currently emerging technologies we'll be able to comfortably travel between the planets in our solar system.
      Maybe in a few *blinks* from now the humanity+ _(420.69$/mo \s)_ will be actually planning their travels across galaxies.

  • @one_hoop
    @one_hoop Рік тому +499

    I love the thought experiment of the Slow Starship, that puts humans in stasis to travel to a distant star system only to awaken and find that future humans have already arrived by a faster starship and evolved both biologically and technologically!

    • @terryharris1291
      @terryharris1291 Рік тому +40

      Isaac Arthur did an episode on colonizing the galaxy at 1% light speed.

    • @zealman79
      @zealman79 Рік тому +18

      startships are meant to flyyyyyy

    • @christopherrogers532
      @christopherrogers532 Рік тому +40

      If we were smart we'd send word to said ships that got out sped or even refit them in flight. Would be pretty funny to send out a ship and have it cruising along only to run into an FTL ship from home bringing all the upgrades and resources it needs to get a move on. :)

    • @Commanderziff
      @Commanderziff Рік тому +49

      There's an old DOS game from the 90's called 'Alien Legacy', where Earth sent out a bunch of seed ships, you're the captain of one of these ships, and you emerge from suspended animation to a message informing you that another ship was launched several years after yours, but since it's a more advanced design, it will be arriving a decade sooner, and the other captain is now your boss. Of course, as you explore the system you can't see any signs of the other ship's crew, or habitations, so now you're left with a mystery to solve. (Eventually you do discover what happened to them, it's not pretty.)

    • @nikhansen213
      @nikhansen213 Рік тому +7

      @@Commanderziff I remember playing this game for hours and hours in my childhood. It was a great game; a good story and excellent mix of exploration, colony building, resource management, etc

  • @dentistrider3874
    @dentistrider3874 Рік тому +104

    I always thought of space and time being on such unfathomably massive time scales that we could never perceive a change without multigenerational record-keeping. Hearing that every *year* we lose 3 galaxies is so mindboggling.

    • @NTJedi
      @NTJedi Рік тому +10

      No way to tell what type of technologies or events which might increase our travels in the universe.... so the PBS space time video is just a theory based on conditions of light speed travel

    • @themichaelvedal
      @themichaelvedal Рік тому +5

      @@NTJedi Agreed. One can fairly assume that some sort of FTL travel will be available in the far future, which will change how this works. Also, if you travel close to the speed of light, there is relativity as well.

    • @bradysmith4405
      @bradysmith4405 Рік тому +4

      @@themichaelvedalthe more I read into it the more I think locally going faster than light probably is actually impossible. But I do think eventually we’d be able to create a warp drive or even travel through higher dimensions

    • @beringstraitrailway
      @beringstraitrailway Рік тому

      ​@@bradysmith4405
      Travelling through other dimensions is how we will travel faster than light.

    • @bradysmith4405
      @bradysmith4405 Рік тому +1

      @@beringstraitrailway physicists aren’t even sure if there really are higher dimensions though. So that’s iffy too.

  • @elvisneedsboats3714
    @elvisneedsboats3714 Рік тому +474

    For some reason, the phrase “…humanity, or whatever succeeds us…” really caught my attention.

    • @pyenapple
      @pyenapple Рік тому +126

      We used to be a different species, we’ll become a new species at some point no matter what happens. It’s just evolution.

    • @tpbarbie
      @tpbarbie Рік тому +38

      Cats

    • @somethinglikethat2176
      @somethinglikethat2176 Рік тому +94

      *Chat GPT quietly sitting in the corner*

    • @elvisneedsboats3714
      @elvisneedsboats3714 Рік тому +19

      @@somethinglikethat2176 And the reason suddenly becomes clear…

    • @andrewlove3686
      @andrewlove3686 Рік тому

      Brown people with 80iq.

  • @alexvalin9085
    @alexvalin9085 Рік тому +13

    I am a simple man and i dont understand many of the things touched on in these videos, but i still enjoy them

  • @panner11
    @panner11 Рік тому +113

    I feel like this channel is so good at slowly accumulating enough reference knowledge from past videos to bring up new and harder to explain topics. Very good programming.

    • @AndrewPonti
      @AndrewPonti Рік тому +12

      That's why we need to continue to fund public television (and its progeny like this) so this type of free thinking is accessible to all. Let's not let the MAGAts destroy this, our public libraries, public education, public health and more.

    • @afonsodeportugal
      @afonsodeportugal Рік тому

      @@AndrewPonti This channel has NOTHING to do with public television. It depends on patrons and other donors. It is as private as it can be!

    • @mikemccormick6128
      @mikemccormick6128 Рік тому +1

      @@afonsodeportugal Not True. This is a PBS show. Look it up.

    • @afonsodeportugal
      @afonsodeportugal Рік тому

      @@mikemccormick6128 Matt has said many time that the channel relies on donations. It has always been its primary source of funding.
      Also, it is very inadvisable to rely on pubic funding, as that sort of thing always ends on wokeness. Is that what you want? That Matt starts to talk about feminism instead of cosmology?

    • @mikemccormick6128
      @mikemccormick6128 Рік тому +1

      @@afonsodeportugal All I'm saying is that the original source is PBS. The program originated on PBS. It is absolutely incorrect to say that this video is unconnected to PBS. I have no idea whether or not the channel is connected to PBS and I don't care. This video originally aired on PBS.

  • @eau_defemme
    @eau_defemme Рік тому +53

    hey matt, long time watcher and fan. The world is getting scarier as time marches on, but watching space time has consistently been there and given me something I can think about. Thank you for the work you and the rest of space time do. ❤

  • @kierranhorsfield3687
    @kierranhorsfield3687 Рік тому +11

    I'm British and was at the Natural History Museum in NYC last month when I saw a very familiar, albeit beardless, Aussie physicist participating in one of the video exhibits in the space wing of the museum. Never knew you were quite so prolific, Matt!

  • @keisimo
    @keisimo Рік тому +76

    PBS Space Time is the perfect combination of huge knowledge and flawless animations, both in an ideal setup to enjoy the content and also learn from it. I've been following it for years and I'm still impressed. I really hope there's content for more years to come, I can't imagine my UA-cam feed without the joy of having a new video.

    • @mrquicky
      @mrquicky Рік тому

      I think Anton should have a discussion with PBS spacetime regarding the calculation of inhabitable planets at 8:57.
      ua-cam.com/video/_Tju7EaSfmM/v-deo.html

  • @Pfhorrest
    @Pfhorrest Рік тому +283

    A followup question I'd like to see explored: assuming we send Von Neumann probes in every direction as fast as possible and as soon as possible, programmed to retrofit every single star in the affectable universe with a stellar engine, and pilot them all toward each other at maximum speed, how much of the affectable universe could we bring together into a gravitationally bound cluster, so as not to be so isolated by the Era of Isolation?

    • @Russo-Delenda-Est
      @Russo-Delenda-Est Рік тому +110

      My thoughts exactly. If we are doomed to heat death, exactly how much fuel (matter) can we accumulate before the rest slips beyond our reach? How much time can we buy ourselves through artificial stars or fusion generators or black hole batteries before the end of days? How much time will our science grant us to rage against the dying of the light?

    • @Pfhorrest
      @Pfhorrest Рік тому +35

      @@Russo-Delenda-Est I'm sure legions of pessimists will immediately pile in here to scream at me about how wrong this is, but since dark energy already violates the *first* law of thermodynamics I'm pretty confident we can in principle exploit that to prevent the heat death of our local part of the cosmos indefinitely. My concern is more about capturing more information, staying in touch with more of the universe that we'd otherwise never be able to hang out with again.

    • @Low_commotion
      @Low_commotion Рік тому

      ​@@Pfhorrest Iirc Issac Arthur had a video on this, "Fleet of Stars" I think it was called. As for avoid heat death, who knows? We can't begin to imagine what discoveries post-human intellects 100,000 years from now will have under their belts, much less the ones billions upon billions of years hence.

    • @richardconway6425
      @richardconway6425 Рік тому +28

      @@Russo-Delenda-Est " ... to rage against the dying of the light"
      Wow!! That's so poetic .. and ... ragey!! but in a non-agressive way... totally!!

    • @richardconway6425
      @richardconway6425 Рік тому +30

      @@Pfhorrest 1. I'm not a pessimist. 2. You *are* wrong.
      Dark energy does not break the first law of thermodynamics. The first law of thermodynamics does not apply, because of the symmetry breaking of spacetime as it expands. (Emily Noethers mathematical theorem on symmetry).

  • @FN1980a
    @FN1980a Рік тому +21

    That light cone and spacetime diagram animations was really neat and made the concept so much easier to follow.

  • @bertberw8653
    @bertberw8653 Рік тому +125

    This is quickly becoming my favorite astronomy/physics channel on youtube.

    • @normalmighty
      @normalmighty Рік тому +19

      For someone like me who did a first year uni physics course but knows nothing more advanced than that, it's the absolutely perfect level of information to get all the good stuff in there without getting so complicated that I get lost in the equations.

    • @bertberw8653
      @bertberw8653 Рік тому +13

      @@normalmighty Weird, because I'm in my 3rd year of physics and I still have trouble wrapping my head around some of this stuff sometimes.

    • @normalmighty
      @normalmighty Рік тому +4

      @@bertberw8653 Oh don't get me wrong, it's challenging, but I feel like he doesn't spend nearly as long diving into the complex math of the issue than other creator's I've seen talking at this level.
      ...plus I kind of skimmed past the string theory stuff lol, those videos were cool, but I couldn't really follow it all past the deeply simplified summary explanations. Maybe one day I'll reach the point where I can follow why exactly we think string theory might be real, but for now I'm just trusting the PhD holders on that one.

    • @richardconway6425
      @richardconway6425 Рік тому

      @@bertberw8653 that's actually really good to hear. Now I don't feel so stupid for not understanding some of the stuff. Did you see the episode explaining the equations of the standard model lagrangian? Hilarious ... sad ...

    • @bertberw8653
      @bertberw8653 Рік тому +3

      @@richardconway6425 Yeah, I just accepted that I'm less intelligent than most people in my major 😂 the good part is that accepting my place made me feel less pressure, and now I know I can just graduate on my own pace and terms

  • @Boomer08888
    @Boomer08888 Рік тому +22

    Man I love this channel - thank you Matt and the whole PBS ST team!!

  •  Рік тому +6

    These videos are something that keeps my mind going! Space Time is THE best channel on UA-cam!

  • @jargontrueseer
    @jargontrueseer Рік тому +74

    Thank you for posting this video at the exact moment that I was available and able to watch it. These videos always make me so happy... even if they are existentially disturbing.

    • @rolirolster
      @rolirolster Рік тому +9

      Plot twist, it was only perfect for you in your version of the universe. In mine, you missed the upload completely.

    • @LuisSierra42
      @LuisSierra42 Рік тому +2

      It's great that PBS is able to work around your schedule

    • @jargontrueseer
      @jargontrueseer Рік тому +2

      @@rolirolster oh god, the ripple of entanglement hasn't reached you yet, tell me, what is the world like if I didn't get to the video on time?? 👀

    • @NeonVisual
      @NeonVisual Рік тому +1

      You're all in my universe, where I have the top comment.

  • @opiesmith9270
    @opiesmith9270 Рік тому +12

    I can’t shake the massive universe size of FOMO, thinking about the exploration and experiences we are missing out on by being born before we could explore any exoplanet…. It’s devastating.

    • @kanishkchaturvedi1745
      @kanishkchaturvedi1745 Рік тому +3

      then support FTL research

    • @opiesmith9270
      @opiesmith9270 Рік тому +3

      @@kanishkchaturvedi1745 absolutely

    • @richardboland1935
      @richardboland1935 Місяць тому

      And yet, just think of the opportunities you're missing on a daily basis by not speaking with the vast majority of the people around you right now...
      There's FOMO worth acting on 😊

  • @JesusChristDenton_7
    @JesusChristDenton_7 Рік тому +14

    "Earth is the cradle of humanity, but one cannot live in a cradle forever." - Konstantin Tsiolkovsky

    • @blizzard1198
      @blizzard1198 Рік тому +2

      Unfortunately the laws of the universe disagree,we were born here and we'll die here

    • @lomicwind
      @lomicwind Рік тому +3

      @@blizzard1198 so true, a catchy phrase won't bend the harsh reality

    • @clark2501
      @clark2501 Рік тому

      ⁠@@blizzard1198you never know. 125 years ago we thought it would be impossible for a human to fly, or such an investment that they’d never see it happen. 60 years later they’re sending satellites into space. Laws (or rather our understanding of them) change over time. We find ways to use them to our advantage, or discover new ideas that allow us to circumvent them to a degree (a human on their own can never fly, but we can create machines based off of principles we discovered that do it for us, allowing us to reach the skies). Our 2 biggest enemies for getting off of Earth is time and ourselves. Time in that, how long do we have to get off this planet before a natural disaster wipes us out? Ourselves in that, nuclear war, pollution, over indulgence on resources etc., will stop us in our tracks. Or resigning ourselves to “it’s impossible” and never actually trying, whether we view it as futile or not. Until the day I die, I will believe it possible as we’ve accomplished the “impossible” time and time again.

    • @connorthomas2667
      @connorthomas2667 11 місяців тому

      I disagree we will travel faster then light for sure @@blizzard1198

    • @dosomestuff1949
      @dosomestuff1949 8 місяців тому +3

      @@blizzard1198 did u even watch the video above and the last 2 videos?????

  • @RHCole
    @RHCole Рік тому +23

    I'm still holding out hope for wormhole travel.

    • @KendraAndTheLaw
      @KendraAndTheLaw Рік тому

      Or extra dims

    • @dominiks_geeky_life_2
      @dominiks_geeky_life_2 29 днів тому

      Not possible. It would take exploding a star to create a wormhole. Even if we managed to create one, it would just take us to a random place in space.

  • @michaelblacktree
    @michaelblacktree Рік тому +181

    I wonder if the Great Attractor is an advanced civilization attempting to gravitationally bind a large chunk of the universe before the era of isolation.

    • @johnducan2487
      @johnducan2487 Рік тому +59

      It's never aliens.

    • @joekoelker7523
      @joekoelker7523 Рік тому +66

      Until it is.

    • @motaaaa
      @motaaaa Рік тому +54

      This is a cool idea for a science fiction story

    • @martiddy
      @martiddy Рік тому +13

      @@johnducan2487 It's never aliens... until it's aliens

    • @567secret
      @567secret Рік тому +34

      People generally fail to understand that the great attractor is just a point we can't observe because it's behind the galactic plane, it's nothing mysterious, and it's almost certainly just a dense region of space with a large cluster.

  • @13579Winter
    @13579Winter Рік тому +3

    “There’s not much left on earth to explore.” That big blue dot? All the blue stuff doesn’t need exploring? Someone call up James Cameron.

  • @mopnem
    @mopnem Рік тому +28

    Been loving watching this channel. It’s funny how people can get sad on like.. only 20 billion galaxies..:(

    • @Nickor11
      @Nickor11 Рік тому +7

      Yeah especially when within our life time the most we can hope for is literally making it to the closest planet around, not even the closest star :D

    • @mrWhite81
      @mrWhite81 Рік тому

      It's called Hybris... or doom.

  • @-homerow-
    @-homerow- Рік тому +8

    Really nice audio editing
    It was refreshing to have no music during the core concept
    And even more impactful to have the music come in during the theoretical and story telling section.
    Thanks for all the videos! 😊

  • @PraveenSrJ01
    @PraveenSrJ01 6 місяців тому +1

    I hope one day the whole entire universe and the cosmos can all be mapped out

  • @rinotilde2699
    @rinotilde2699 Рік тому +19

    We always forget these things when we make science fiction movies ... thank you for explaining these ideas in easy to understand formats

    • @maythesciencebewithyou
      @maythesciencebewithyou Рік тому +2

      scify movies are always full of plot devices. And people take those too seriously.

    • @gabor6259
      @gabor6259 Рік тому +2

      We also forget that aliens don't speak with a British accent.

    • @martiddy
      @martiddy Рік тому +6

      @@gabor6259 True, they speak with American accent

    • @pyropulseIXXI
      @pyropulseIXXI Рік тому

      Movies exist to tell a story. It is called science FICTION. Old Science fiction used to imagine new worlds and amazing new things, but modern sci fi is just dystopian nonsense

    • @maythesciencebewithyou
      @maythesciencebewithyou Рік тому +4

      @@martiddy Of course they speak English with an American accent. Why else do you think they always land in the US.

  • @ruudvdlinden
    @ruudvdlinden Рік тому +12

    I like the term "affectable universe". I wonder, if our universe turns out to be informational (or holographic) in origin, if the expansion of the universe could have something to do with affectability and causality in general. The more (complex) interaction the more the universe speeds up. Dark energy may be informational/computational in origin and naturally regulate the density of information and interactions within the universe, maintaining the informational structure in a way that aligns with the expansion.
    Kind of off-topic, but this episode inspired this idea :)

    • @jengleheimerschmitt7941
      @jengleheimerschmitt7941 Рік тому

      . . . I think if we ever figure out how to edit whatever the holograph stuff us made of, we can make a bunch of those screwdriver things from Dr. Who and do whatever we want.

    • @richardboland1935
      @richardboland1935 Місяць тому

      Informationally speaking, the entire affectable universe is, to a first approximation, right here on Earth.

  • @crowlsyong
    @crowlsyong 6 місяців тому +1

    Brilliant episode. Thank you for doing this PBS

  • @perpetualprocrastinator
    @perpetualprocrastinator Рік тому +21

    just imagine in the not too distant future ,if humanity discovers that human civilization on earth is also a causally disconnected region of a far more ancient civilization (premise of Battlestar Galactica)

  • @Zeitaluq
    @Zeitaluq Рік тому +6

    Nice episode and leaves one wondering if humanity has a future beyond Earth.

    • @InnuendoXP
      @InnuendoXP Рік тому +2

      Not without either changing in some very fundamental ways - or not without losing most of us along the way.

    • @Fizz-Pop
      @Fizz-Pop Рік тому +2

      I personally believe we will have a base on the Moon, and probably at least send people to Mars, though realistically we won't colonize it as it just isn't worth the effort or the cost. I seriously doubt we will go any further than that. It's nice to dream though.

  • @RandallSlick
    @RandallSlick 7 місяців тому +1

    The if in Sagan's 'if we do not destroy ourselves' is doing some very heavy lifting. Good luck all.

  • @rootkite
    @rootkite Рік тому +11

    Thanks for another fantastic video! I do have to say though, "These days there's not much of the Earth left to explore" made me do a spit-take right off the bat... The oceans and the Amazon spring immediately to mind.

    • @AlemitoFilms
      @AlemitoFilms Рік тому +2

      I agree, I work as a pilot and often have the chance to overfly beautiful landscapes, but I feel my true experience of nature happens hiking ankles deep in the mud of the lowest valley rather than flying over the highest mountains.
      I don't think a lifetime is enough to explore the physical Earth, let alone the people, arts, philosophy...

  • @zacharywong483
    @zacharywong483 Рік тому +2

    Fantastic video, as always, Space Time team!

  • @marcocaliri8807
    @marcocaliri8807 Місяць тому

    Congrats. Very well explained. Even if I do not have important cosmology and physic basis, it was a pleasure to follow you during the explanation

  • @ariphaos
    @ariphaos Рік тому +12

    One thing I noticed writing a short story about this scenario: you can use the expansion of spacetime itself to do most of your deceleration for you. This simplifies the colonization process enormously, meaning extra-galactic-cluster colonization may be a great deal simpler than colonizing nearby galaxies. Still, I would question the value of colonizing things at the edge of our Hubble horizon - by the time colonists got there, the target galaxy would consist of nothing but red dwarfs and various types of dead stars. It'd feel rather depressing, I would think.

    • @Deus_Almighty
      @Deus_Almighty Рік тому +12

      I'm pretty sure it doesn't work like that, you still need to decelerate, you're not slowed by the stretching of space.

    • @christopherrogers532
      @christopherrogers532 Рік тому +2

      @@nadsenoj8719 lol we'd be moving the whole galaxy to the destination at that point. :)

    • @Karlswebb
      @Karlswebb Рік тому

      It doesn’t work that way. You don’t slow down. From your perspective the galaxy speeds up towards you the closer you get lol.
      Say you’re going half c towards a galaxy 5 billion light years away today.
      You start at 5 billion light years. Doing the math the galaxy is receding by 104,000 km/s from you. You’re going 150,000 km/s. You are gaining 46000 km/s.
      Boom; you’re 4 billion now. Galaxy is receding at 83,500 km/s. You’re still moving at half c. There’s been no force acting on you; you’re in an inertial frame. So now you’re gaining on it by 66,500 km/s.
      Now you’re 1 light year away. You’re gaining on it roughly 150,000 km/s. decelerate fast lmao.

    • @dsdy1205
      @dsdy1205 Рік тому

      Red dwarves are very very very good locations for colonies, if you have the sort of tech needed for giga-lightyear journeys.

  • @ReaperUnreal
    @ReaperUnreal Рік тому +7

    It kind of sounds like every local cluster we visit will have it's own sphere that it can never lose communication with. Might be interesting to know which one of the current clusters we see would be the most optimal one to grow in.

    • @30803080308030803081
      @30803080308030803081 Рік тому +1

      The nearest one, the Virgo Cluster, is huge. Our Local Group is really puny. If our descendants can travel to other clusters, they definitely will travel to Virgo. That cluster alone has more than 1,000 galaxies to explore.
      The Local Group and the Virgo Cluster are in the Virgo Supercluster. The nearest other supercluster is the Hydra-Centaurus Supercluster, which is closer to the Great Attractor.
      The Wikipedia article on the Laniakea Supercluster (which is more like a super-supercluster) has some diagrams.

    • @foragreenfuture6030
      @foragreenfuture6030 Рік тому

      But we will eventually lose contact with them, if expansion continues infinitely, we will eventually lose contact with everything.

    • @Karlswebb
      @Karlswebb Рік тому +3

      @@foragreenfuture6030Wrong. Locally bound objects remain bound. So the local groups remain bound. Gravity is still strong enough to resist the expansion at that point. If we can get to a large gravitationally bound cluster we’re effectively safe there.
      Super clusters don’t count. The individual clusters aren’t bound to each other anymore, they’re clustered because the filament structure of the universe emerged early in its history. Space is too big now, only local groups are bound.
      Tl;dr; gravitationally bound objects remain together. Objects too far apart don’t have enough pull to resist the expansion. Eventually all the galaxies in each locally bound group will merge into one super galaxy.

    • @mikemccormick6128
      @mikemccormick6128 Рік тому

      @@Karlswebb No, you are wrong. foragreenfuture6030 is talking about the Virgo Cluster. Yes we will lose contact with the Virgo Cluster. Why do you need to be so oppositional.

  • @alexbowman7582
    @alexbowman7582 Рік тому +2

    Once robotics and cyborgs has taken over distances, time and the dangers of space will not be such a barrier.

  • @Jacstaoisitio
    @Jacstaoisitio Рік тому +22

    I would argue that travelling at 2% lightspeed is more realistic than 20%

    • @physics_hacker
      @physics_hacker Рік тому +7

      We already have the tech for 20%, it's just that it's currently banned. But treaties like that don't last forever, no treaty does, really. We've got far longer than humanity has already existed to decide to break the treaty and use the technology we already have, not even to mention invent new tech that's even better. I see no reason why that couldn't be realistic.

    • @Jacstaoisitio
      @Jacstaoisitio Рік тому

      @@physics_hacker a trading that even North Korea Iran China follows? Could be I'm truly ignorant and don't know what treaty you are. Are you talking about one of those conspiracies Nazis on the moon, the Nazi Bell, or the Nazi base in Antarctica?

    • @Sunlight91
      @Sunlight91 Рік тому

      @@physics_hacker If we manage to create permanent settlements on other planets then they won't care about earth treaties. A cultural drift is guaranteed. Over a few thousand years they could even become a new sub species.

    • @BleedingTrue
      @BleedingTrue Рік тому +3

      @Ein Kunde because it involves detonating nukes in space

    • @Hemzees
      @Hemzees 9 місяців тому

      @@physics_hackermoreover these speeds are achieved by slingshotting and I have seen an idea using rotating black holes almost along an interstellar highway

  • @w0lfyovi294
    @w0lfyovi294 Рік тому +8

    Would it be the best plan to maximize resources by sending the colonies farther they can go without losing communication, use the resources from those systems and slowly migrate inward towards Earth as the Isolation Era approaches and engulfs our galaxy cluster? (I think I played to many RTS games)

    • @ShadeAKAhayate
      @ShadeAKAhayate Рік тому +4

      As if colony administrations will gladly and happily send all their resources to the metropoly.

    • @ShadeAKAhayate
      @ShadeAKAhayate Рік тому +1

      @Nikita Nazarov That's one of the problems inherent to the imperial economy, especially when we talk feudal-like structure.

    • @mikemccormick6128
      @mikemccormick6128 Рік тому +1

      I don't think he was being very honest about communications. Communications would take 10s of millions to 100s of millions of years depending on how far away these galaxies are. I think it is extremely unlikely that we will ever go past our local group. I think it would be highly unlikely that we will get past the Milky Way before life on Earth will be unlivable.

  • @Thanhatos
    @Thanhatos Рік тому +1

    Instant subscription. I love this kind of stuff. Thank you.

  • @rubenk548
    @rubenk548 Рік тому +4

    It would be interesting to see, based on these calculations and some assumptions of different points in time, where any alien life might originate from at the furthest.

  • @SupLuiKir
    @SupLuiKir Рік тому +50

    What if we use Stellar Engines to push the star systems we inhabit towards the Milky Way? How many galaxies of stars could we potentially drag back into our Local Group before Isolation?

    • @mrcat5508
      @mrcat5508 Рік тому +7

      Don’t ask good questions

    • @tr48092
      @tr48092 Рік тому +3

      You would have to have 1 stellar engine per star. You couldn't use a single engine for an entire galaxy by tugging on the black hole. Remember that 80% of the mass of most galaxies is dark matter.

    • @op4000exe
      @op4000exe Рік тому

      @@tr48092 Even if that's the case, as long as you accelerate a star, it will pull on the dark matter via gravity, just like how the gravity of the dark matter pulls on it. That's essentially the idea behind a gravity tractor, and if you build 1 stellar engine per star, you could accelerate entire galaxies, not quickly mind you, but over time, maybe quickly enough.

    • @mickeyg7219
      @mickeyg7219 Рік тому +5

      I believe Isaac Arthur proposed that as a way to merge galaxies.

    • @solsystem1342
      @solsystem1342 Рік тому +4

      Powered by starlight they're too slow. Kurtzkazart's stellar engine however could probably get a fair few back
      Not much point though when you could just live there instead.

  • @lokisg3
    @lokisg3 11 місяців тому +1

    "As long liberty spread across the universe"
    - Helldiver

  • @bxdanny
    @bxdanny Рік тому +3

    i think I asked this once before, but what is the radius of the non-expanding region of space that contains our galaxy? If I understand correctly, it is the "local cluster" of galaxies, but how big is that? Do we know where the boundary is between space which is expanding and the internal space of our local cluster, which isn't?

    • @30803080308030803081
      @30803080308030803081 Рік тому

      Yeah, I have read about this, and the sad answer is that all galactic clusters will eventually move farther and farther from each other. Our cluster is the Local Group, and it is small.
      It’s possible to travel to other clusters, as this video showed. But the longer you wait to begin going somewhere, the faster you have to go to get there.
      Descendants of humans might spread to several clusters of galaxies. I hope they will. But the civilizations within the clusters will eventually become permanently isolated from each other.

  • @lizdierdorf
    @lizdierdorf Рік тому +5

    0:10 yes there is… the oceans! we only know less than 10% of the oceans

  • @davestier6247
    @davestier6247 10 місяців тому +1

    Pretty optimistic considering most of the Travelers I encounter each day can't figure out the concept of a 4 way stop sign.

  • @ransombot
    @ransombot Рік тому +10

    Could entangled quantum bits communicate beyond that horizon if we can escape it? Could one inside it get "magically" pared to one outside it and see influences without being there? Does the heat death date of 10 to the 10 to the 10 to the 56 take into account the era of isolation?

    • @himynameis3664
      @himynameis3664 Рік тому +2

      I was thinking about some kind of quantum communicator aswell. If we could entangle the particles ourselves one day we might unlock a way for them to have reasonable communication over some vast distances. Who knows what the future has in store for us

    • @gunslinger2566
      @gunslinger2566 Рік тому +1

      In theory, it's called an ansible.
      Entangled particles, lightyears apart, that allow instant communication. Ender's Game had a good example of it.

    • @Vivi2372
      @Vivi2372 Рік тому +10

      Entangled particles can share information instantaneously, but attempting to manipulate them to send a signal breaks the entanglement. You can't use them to communicate.

    • @scottslotterbeck3796
      @scottslotterbeck3796 Рік тому

      ​@@gunslinger2566yeah but impossible.

    • @ShadeAKAhayate
      @ShadeAKAhayate Рік тому +1

      Sadly, no. You have to send regular additional information to decypher anything sent through such communicator, and that regular information can't travel faster than light.

  • @nobodynobody4389
    @nobodynobody4389 Рік тому +7

    Depends on whether FTL is possible

  • @Mbitutu
    @Mbitutu Рік тому +1

    I would contribute a term of Frogging from the game Frogger. If we jump from log to log and wait for a galaxy to come closer to the “log” galaxy that we land within then we would have to wait for the next galaxy to pass by. This could be “forever” if we have actually understood the movement of galaxies from the observable universe. However being a violent society this may never be realized.

  • @DCII
    @DCII Рік тому +11

    I'd like to see the same graphs showing a ship's communications, while traveling at C, sent and received, with earth not only as you have but also what happens when the ship stops, turns around and heads back.
    I'm just an old broken truckdriver struggling to grasp a general understanding of as much of everything I can. 🙂

    • @evangonzalez2245
      @evangonzalez2245 Рік тому

      Well I can tell you exactly what they receive, nothing. One second out from earth and nothing can catch up to them 😋

    • @recyclemeatt
      @recyclemeatt Рік тому

      imagine the ship is just the same as information. The ship is traveling as fast as information can travel.

  • @tommylakindasorta3068
    @tommylakindasorta3068 Рік тому +5

    This is one of my favorite episodes. Thinking at this grand a scale really puts life into perspective for me.

    • @pyropulseIXXI
      @pyropulseIXXI Рік тому

      What an odd thing to say. Considering this 'grand scale' is nothing more than a thought in your head, how can it put "life into perspective" for you? Life where you are at it he most important thing there is, as that is your life. What happens 'out there' has no affect on you, except as a metaphor for what occurs out there occurs down here, and what is above, is likewise below

    • @LouseGrouse
      @LouseGrouse Рік тому

      @@pyropulseIXXI I think the simple answer to your question is that this person isn’t you and they have a different perspective and that’s okay lmao
      Have a good one

    • @tommylakindasorta3068
      @tommylakindasorta3068 Рік тому

      @@pyropulseIXXI OK, Obi Wan.

  • @dongordon9378
    @dongordon9378 4 місяці тому

    My brain hurts and that doesn’t happen very often. Wow that was great. Nice journalism man!!

  • @damonjones4972
    @damonjones4972 Рік тому +2

    Hey Matt,
    Awesome job with the channel.
    If you haven't done one yet can you do a video on what an interstellar spaceship would look like.
    How to house a population and what energy and food production would be.
    Thanks

  • @alfredshort3
    @alfredshort3 7 місяців тому +5

    Answer: as far as we can reach wifi

  • @idajane1974
    @idajane1974 Рік тому +1

    Without ANOTHER propulsion system currently exist, we can NEVER LEAVE THE MILKY WAY GALAXY

  • @mjolnir3309
    @mjolnir3309 Рік тому +8

    i'm glad you considered speciation and intercommunication. IMO, human decendants can colonize a vast amount of space, but humans won't. speciation will likely happen before we even really leave ths solarsystem.

  • @thesimplicitylifestyle
    @thesimplicitylifestyle Рік тому +10

    It’s an exciting time to be alive, if we end up becoming a multiplanetary species we are quite literally at the beginning of our species story.

    • @HawkGTboy
      @HawkGTboy Рік тому +4

      We will not become a multiplanetary species. We are at the end of human history and the last human will gasp his last breath right here on Earth.

    • @undercoverbrother67
      @undercoverbrother67 Рік тому +10

      ​@@HawkGTboy I bet you're fun at parties.

    • @themostwanted774
      @themostwanted774 Рік тому

      @@HawkGTboyshut up.

    • @marcothorsen950
      @marcothorsen950 Рік тому

      ​@@HawkGTboy🌍 💥

    • @4shadow2
      @4shadow2 Рік тому +1

      @@undercoverbrother67 no youre just scared of the bitter truth

  • @Agent77X
    @Agent77X Рік тому +1

    The Aliens, Predator movie series already explored theses ideas!😮

  • @fraliexb
    @fraliexb Рік тому +12

    I've always thought "aliens" are actually future former Human hybrids (space traveling humans) travelling time.

    • @leonardgibney2997
      @leonardgibney2997 Рік тому +3

      You know, the fact they can move through the atmosphere silently is significant. I've seen a vast ship, a disc possibly miles across, travel at several thousand mph across the sky silently before disappearing into thin air. It's also the ability to become invisible l find interesting. Until we humans have such a technology interstellar travel as these guys seem to do will be impossible. But l think it's beyond us as it seems to inhabit a different dimension.

  • @rjm7168
    @rjm7168 Рік тому +13

    This just shows how important FTL travel will be.

    • @somethinglikethat2176
      @somethinglikethat2176 Рік тому +15

      If it's possible.

    • @martiddy
      @martiddy Рік тому +1

      Moving faster than light through space is impossible. However, warping and moving the space itself faster than light is a different thing.

    • @erdemmemisyazici3950
      @erdemmemisyazici3950 Рік тому

      This concept of quintessence, a scalar field seems to be of interest in physics. I do hope dark energy is some sort of fundamental force we can find ways to effect as then perhaps c won't be our limiting factor.
      It's impossible to travel faster than c as it is the maximum speed but there seems to be more to our understanding of gravity, specifically in cases where it is repulsive rather than attractive. If we can find a way to bring spacetime closer instead of exchanging within it, that would be the way to go. But at the moment that seems to be beyond our understanding.
      If it is nothing but a dream 3 galaxies gone a year sounds pretty bad.

    • @DrWhom
      @DrWhom Рік тому +1

      @@martiddy it is a tricky thing, too

    • @scottslotterbeck3796
      @scottslotterbeck3796 Рік тому +2

      No FTL. Sorry!!!

  • @CritterKeeper01
    @CritterKeeper01 2 місяці тому

    Yes, we *did* notice your graphics included Kasterboros, first planet settled Gallifrey! Thank you, nerdy graphics peeps!

  • @PwnzTube
    @PwnzTube Рік тому +5

    Before we attempt this thought experiment, I believe we should discuss how much we would allow ourselves to modify what it meant to be human and still call ourselves human. As this is likely going to be a big part of the future with groups already dedicated to human modification and technology already dramatically enhancing the human experience.

  • @goldiegolderman1842
    @goldiegolderman1842 Рік тому +3

    *THE GOD EMPEROR WILLS THAT WE RULE THE GALAXY!*

  • @TheShawnMower
    @TheShawnMower Рік тому

    Love this content. Please keep it coming, I share every time

  • @LORDxCYBORG
    @LORDxCYBORG Рік тому +10

    It would be interesting if you could implement time dilation from the perspective of humans on Earth relative to the humans on the spacecraft traveling at near light speeds

    • @nuru666
      @nuru666 Рік тому +4

      Time Dilation is such a kick in the balls >.

    • @LORDxCYBORG
      @LORDxCYBORG Рік тому +2

      @Ein Kunde Not too bright...

    • @LORDxCYBORG
      @LORDxCYBORG Рік тому +3

      @Ein Kunde his content is comprehensive. How do you not get this? Just watch retroactively and take two Tylenol for the pain after you slap yourself.

  • @deepashtray5605
    @deepashtray5605 Рік тому +6

    Has anyone tried to calculate when the first human spinoff species could emerge, when one of our descendants has evolved into a different species?

    • @maythesciencebewithyou
      @maythesciencebewithyou Рік тому +5

      Speciation in mammals takes about 4-5 million years naturally. Can also happen much quicker. Much faster if were to do some selective breeding.

    • @JoeWithTheHoesBiden
      @JoeWithTheHoesBiden Рік тому

      it depends on a lot of things
      1) how much quantum tunneling occurs per population member
      2) how far away our colonies our
      3) how many people are in our colonies
      4) how gravity changes in the area, because mechanics vary an extreme amount based on gravitational forces in the area (I hate using newtonian terms, but I used 'gravity' for conciseness)
      5) the decay rates of particles in the colony
      6) the changes in the environment of the region, relative to earth
      calculate for all of the above, and you might have a decent picture
      if I missed anything, or got anything wrong, then feel free to change my list!

    • @AlbertaGeek
      @AlbertaGeek Рік тому +2

      @@JoeWithTheHoesBiden #1 is the OP trying to sound smarter than he is. Also, see #5. #4 is again the OP trying to sound smarter than he is. #5 decay rates are not location dependent. Perhaps for #1 and #5 you meant the ambient ionizing radiation? #6 is just a blanket covering all environmental factors so it makes numbers 4 & 5 redundant.

    • @Censeo
      @Censeo Рік тому +1

      What we send up is probably not humans of today. We are not very well suited for space travel. If we insist on humans, then an idea would be to terraform planets with ai before growing them

    • @MrScorpianwarrior
      @MrScorpianwarrior Рік тому +1

      @@AlbertaGeek Yeah I'd be curious to know what effects radiation exposure over long (1000+ year) trips would be. I suppose by the time we can do that though, we will have likely have much better shielding technology.

  • @pete6705
    @pete6705 Місяць тому

    Sometimes I wonder if we’d be better off saying we probably won’t ever settle on another planet, so let’s try to take care of Earth and it’s resources and make sure we can live here for a very long time.

  • @Mr.Brownstain-xf2ne
    @Mr.Brownstain-xf2ne 6 місяців тому +3

    For the Emperor

  • @TheYashakami
    @TheYashakami Рік тому +3

    There are a lot of unvoiced presuppositions in this video. You assume faster than light travel is impossible, you assume humans would only live on habitable planets(!?), you assume dark energy is real, you assume the universe is expanding. I recommend voicing your assumptions at the beginning of the video next time.

  • @WatchingEqualsExp
    @WatchingEqualsExp Рік тому +11

    If we found some substance that produced the opposite effect of Dark Energy and could use it on a local scale to shrink spacetime in front of a ship while also using Dark Energy behind the ship to expand spacetime, could that be a method of getting past any of the Event Horizons?

    • @Siddingsby
      @Siddingsby Рік тому +9

      Faster 👏than 👏light 👏 travel 👏 is 👏equivalent 👏 to 👏time 👏 travel

    • @Astromath
      @Astromath Рік тому +5

      What you're describing is called an Alcubierre Drive - or simply Warp Drive
      And the "substance that produces the opposite effect of Dark Energy" is basically just normal matter; we don't yet know however what Dark Energy is nor do we know whether any other substance exists that creates a negative energy density like Dark Energy

    • @formlessone8246
      @formlessone8246 Рік тому +8

      ​@@Astromath actually, no. The opposite effect of dark energy is just gravity. Ironically, if you want to make a warp drive, then it's dark energy itself that you want to harness, as it has exactly the kind of effects on spacetime that you are looking for- namely, the ability to create expansion or negative pressure. This is precisely why the cosmos is able to expand faster than light, we essentially live within a warp drive. The problem is that first of all, we don't know what dark energy is, so we can't manipulate it like we would want to in order to use it to make warp drives; and second, it appears to be distributed evenly throughout the entire cosmos, while we want to concentrate it in one small bubble of spacetime with a neat arrangement in order to create superluminal velocity. Until we know more about what dark energy is, the alternative is a bizarre thing called negative energy, which sorta does exist in certain conditions in quantum mechanics, but like all quantum effects, trying to make it manifest usefully in the macroscopic world is a pain and may not pan out. Maybe we can make a warp drive, but because of causality related reasons or hawking radiation, the best we can do is travel at exactly C. Which, in fairness, isn't possible any other way. The energy needed would be infinite.

    • @JoeWithTheHoesBiden
      @JoeWithTheHoesBiden Рік тому +2

      @@formlessone8246 I mean, technically anything is a warp drive, since any massive object (an object with mass) can warp spacetime, just depends on what curvature you're looking for
      so, both of you are correct

    • @kaitlyn__L
      @kaitlyn__L Рік тому

      @@formlessone8246 not all warp drive concepts require an expansion out of the back, some just have an extreme energy density in the front to compress spacetime and allow its natural elasticity to settle itself back out the other end. That'd presumably produce a much bigger disturbance of gravitational waves than a controlled re-expansion though.

  • @lucasrosen369
    @lucasrosen369 Рік тому +3

    Some people have already mentioned this but it seems like we could have contact with even the most distant colonies so long as we have intermediate colonies (an outpost) to spread the message. I wonder how often you would have to send a colony from earth to still communicate to the most distant colony?

    • @sergey_a
      @sergey_a Рік тому +3

      Not really. If outposts are used, then communication will be interrupted at the same time or earlier, between the extreme systems. At a time when space will expand at the speed of light or faster, adding intermediate points on the way does not help. Either the signal does not reach this intermediate station, or it does, but it will never reach the Earth from the intermediate station.

    • @sergey_a
      @sergey_a Рік тому +3

      The last signal that we can get from the colony will pass along the border of the cone (12:31). And we will not even dare to answer it, because the signal will not be able to catch up with the world that has gone beyond the boundaries of the cone.

  • @0farmerjohn0
    @0farmerjohn0 Рік тому

    I like to imagine that in the days that we reach for the stars. We will meet our ancestors who went ahead of us before the previous extinction events. Who knows they probably left clues on where they went and a few tech left behind to help us get there faster.

  • @stonefish1318
    @stonefish1318 Рік тому +3

    Hurry Up, Elon! 🚀🌀

  • @drwhave
    @drwhave Рік тому

    I love all of ypur videos and want to watch every single one, but man there's a lot :D keep them coming

  • @chiroo2
    @chiroo2 Рік тому

    nowhere, we have grown out of this, everything has to be exactly like this and it's only here

  • @kingothesea1
    @kingothesea1 Рік тому

    This is a fantastic argument against UFOs or UAPs.

  • @LectricLetus
    @LectricLetus Рік тому

    A still more glorious dawn awaits, not a sunrise, but a galaxy rise.

  • @bogdar2019
    @bogdar2019 Рік тому

    Great job, man! As always! Great video

  • @neur0ness
    @neur0ness Рік тому

    Communication solution: create a breadcrumb trail of communication satellites that remain in the orbit of each planet we pass. This would create nodes for signal communication to daisy-chain or hop a signal along between each planet (a much shorter distance). Rather than trying to send a direct signal all the way back to Earth and then directly all the way back, you'd just send it to your nearest planetary communication node or satellite to then propagate back and forth. Like we do now with cable/internet/phones but bigger.

  • @Nostromo2144
    @Nostromo2144 Рік тому

    I see two large assumptions here:
    1. the accelerating expansion of the universe will continue at the present rate and never slow down, stop or reverse direction
    2. future humanity will never be able to travel or communicate almost instantly using wormholes, or an advanced quantum entanglement device or something similar

  • @brian.the.archivist
    @brian.the.archivist Рік тому +2

    Thinking back on the warp speed episode...if we can overcome those limits somehow to get warp drives, what would the warp factor have to be in order to get past our light cone to what is likely the most distant point? In say 100 or 1000 years

  • @aresaurelian
    @aresaurelian Рік тому

    When you travel, you also change your frame of reference, and thus there are no limits except acceleration to the reference frame.

  • @hm.p.k1371
    @hm.p.k1371 Рік тому +1

    As a sci fi fan I have to say, based on all the science I can understand, it seems to me we need to crack antigravity and artificial gravity. Gravity is the only thing stronger then light and with an unfathomable amount of energy perhaps we could travel faster then light. We need that Alcubierre Warp drive guys and gals, better get to work!!!

    • @richardboland1935
      @richardboland1935 Місяць тому

      So long as you don't shirk your duty to pick up litter in your local community 😂

  • @helomusicc
    @helomusicc 7 місяців тому +1

    I want to get to the timeline where I own my Space battle ship to travel worlds and galaxies, I wish we achieve top speed soon

  • @alex79suited
    @alex79suited Рік тому

    Always an interesting listen Matt, thank you.

  • @seanhoude
    @seanhoude Рік тому

    I still say it's so much simpler than this. Time-dilation alone, explains the "force" of gravity as well as the accelerating expansion of the universe.

  • @jeffwinkler1137
    @jeffwinkler1137 Рік тому

    I'd refer you to Anton Petrovs recent vid about the edge of the expanding universe acting as an observer and bringing EVERYTHING into existence

  • @sidwhiting665
    @sidwhiting665 Місяць тому

    Space is big. Insanely big. People who say, "well, we figured out how to sail across the oceans when once people thought it was impossible" are missing that point in so many ways it's mind-boggling.
    Before the first human sailed across the Atlantic Ocean, we were still able to sail ships the same distance it would take the cross the Atlantic in about 2 months by simply staying close to shore. The only discoveries we had to make were how to build ships that could handle rougher seas and a reliable means of navigation. We already had ships that could travel the same speed as ocean-going ships would travel. The time frame wasn't a problem: navigation and durability were the problems.
    To "sail" to the nearest star would take over 3 generation's lifetimes going 20% the speed of light because you'd have to accelerate and decelerate in order not to miss your target. Doing that involves technologies that haven't been invented yet. Then you also have the problem of durability as any collision with even small particles would be like small atomic bombs going off, the effects on the human body from microgravity, radiation, lack of natural sunlight, maintaining oxygen, maintaining food supplies, and probably the most difficult challenge of all: how to convince a group of 200+ people not to kill each other and stay focused on a single goal for 100 years.
    The human factor isn't something science can invent a solution for. Imagine being the fist generation of kids born about 1-2 years after blasting off for the 100 year voyage. You'd be growing up on a star ship and finding our your parents decided to trap you on a ship for your entire life never knowing either your home world or the world you would eventually reach. Never see a sunrise or sunset. Never go fishing. Never go swimming in a river or lake. Never go hiking in the mountain. Never see the changing of the seasons: snow, rain, leaves falling - none of that would have any meaning for you.
    My guess is at least some children would be incredibly pissed off about that and figure out a way to turn that ship around once they saw how amazing Earth was compared to our nearest interstellar neighbor. Humans were made to be on Earth. Unless you can figure out a way to go there and back in a few years, it's not happening.

  • @twowheelunicycle8603
    @twowheelunicycle8603 11 місяців тому

    Superluminal communications will have to become reality to have a well organized and connected society across galaxies.

  • @dehart3028
    @dehart3028 Рік тому

    When the series on the fundamentals of the universe resumes, how about covering emergent gravity: Understanding Galaxy Rotation Curves with Verlinde's Emergent Gravity
    Youngsub Yoon, Jong-Chul Park, Ho Seong Hwang

  • @DanielLee-gx9py
    @DanielLee-gx9py Рік тому

    In order to answer many of physics greatest questions we need to determine if faster than light travel is possible, but we need these answers in advance to make faster than light travel possible in the first place

  • @MegaPsychomonkey
    @MegaPsychomonkey Рік тому

    That proverbial "wall" at the edge of a video game world.

  • @yomogami4561
    @yomogami4561 Рік тому

    thanks for adding gallifrey in the kasterborouas system

  • @joeperkins2406
    @joeperkins2406 Рік тому

    If cellular biology depends on time ticking at a specific rate, all this gets prohibitively difficult. Satellites have to correct for the time difference in orbit, but our cells cannot just up and do that. The longer you're away from home, the more time your body spends putting itself back together slightly out of order.

  • @ragtop63
    @ragtop63 Рік тому

    "so the state of humanity at the moment of launch will form the seed of our cosmic legacy"
    Trust me, this is a scary thought for everyone who's been watching humanity.
    Hopefully humans will figure it out sometime within the next billion years.

  • @mtgoxsucks435
    @mtgoxsucks435 Рік тому

    The more time goes by the more I think we will never leave our solar system. The way we treat each other and our planet won’t allow us to survive long enough to figure this all out. 😢 I hope I’m wrong 🙏

  • @JimmyRussell-c2s
    @JimmyRussell-c2s 2 місяці тому

    Styx,"I got too much time on my hands".LOL
    DESIGHN STARGATES

  • @enriquevargas2514
    @enriquevargas2514 Рік тому

    Que gran video, aguante PBS!!!

  • @JimKirksHandsomeBrother
    @JimKirksHandsomeBrother Рік тому

    There is no limit except time and ingenuity.

  • @Loxo74
    @Loxo74 Рік тому

    Theorie and Praxis is somehow different, if you start right now a journey with sol you're never sure if the goal is there if you reach it

  • @neiljohnson6815
    @neiljohnson6815 Рік тому

    This is really an unanswerable question. We cannot know or even guess what technology will look like in, say, two hundred years.