Watch More from Academy of Wealth 🔵 The Untold Twitter Story: Scandal, Backstabs and Karma ua-cam.com/video/Dc5wC9qCvZs/v-deo.html 🔴 Uber: The Greatest MAFIA Plot of All Time ua-cam.com/video/yT7ZR-J-2IY/v-deo.html 🟢 How Starbucks Took Over the World! ua-cam.com/video/LQdwrLkPzJI/v-deo.html 📺 Visit Our Channel More: www.youtube.com/@academyofwealth
Yeah, we're just going to let the slaves do all the work since they're not "human" and therefore don't "think" or "have feelings". You are an encyclopedia that can search itself and be creative with that knowledge, there is no difference except the existence of a soul (as far as we know), but that doesn't make them unworthy of human rights.
It's great book if you want to know how to get your life better and get the money you always wanted, these people always talk shit and they didn't even buy it
@@derekcrane9929 This is literally basic economics. Having an abundance of material goods because of industrialization for everyone is not the same as being rich. And no he's wrong because when everybody is sciencing somebody still has to do the other jobs in the meantime.
@Z R you missed the greater point though. The point was the more educated a society can become, the extreme version of that would be having no need for those "other jobs". I'm not one to argue on youtube, but it's definitely worth thinking through his concepts versus the exact idea.
Nothing to do with magic, he is telling facts.. The problem is in governments... Education have to have much higher priority.. They shoud increase investments in instructions because thats the real problem of humanity today
He's actually talking about real economic ideology, and had an excellent point about post scarcity society where people can all do things they enjoy because robots handle the work. This economic model requires some kind of universal income though.
That's literally impossible. This only applies if there's only one thing to be good at. But there's many things to specialize in, so this will never be true.
Why do somebody have to be “special”? People should just accept that we all are the same damn lump of meat in different forms. The only “value” separating people is whether or not they contribute making the world and the human experience better for all.
@@TospikKing why not? You can learn anything in the world for free online, you might not get a certificate or a diploma to hang on your wall, but you can still know the same knowledge as someone who has. It wouldn’t cost you a single penny.
@@HRHMANSOUR The best argument would be to take the “educated” person who disagrees and have them try to pass all the exams they took to get their degree. They had to of retained the knowledge right.
@@tibofordeyn1529 you know what rich means? Rich fucking means having more fucking money than a majority of fucking people that fucking have to work hard all fucking life for a living. Hypothetically speaking if everyone is rich, you can't define that as rich as there's not much pay gap between them. And you know what can it be called? Idk, we should set up a term for that as there's no one poorer or richer than anyone. And there's just so much wrong in this guy's imagination, economy doesn't work like that
@@gdgd5194 maybe you should ask yourself what you have contributed to this world. Lemme guess, shaming people you don't like? If you don't have a point to make, atleast try not to be a hypocrite.
@@durganaveen4152 Maybe you should try to go on Joe Rogan's show and show everyone how your imagination is so much better than that man's instead of bein a hypocrite and shaming a random person you don't like on comments?
the point he is trying to make is that everything will be automated. Think WALL-E, if robots do everything for free and renewable energy is completely practical, there is enough robots we could theoretically have unlimited supply. The issue is without purpose many people get either lazy or depressed or both.
@@gilbertlopez literally wall-e is probably gonna become a reality everything is so easy now people are getting paid to not work and we’re close to creating almost human like robots that could replace us shits kinda scary if you ask me
@@tiffanysmith1465 lol I'm a software developer. I'm exactly where I want to be in life, thanks. Only takes a minute to realize this is a ridiculous thought and a ridiculous conclusion.
ok thanks to the internet I have met people that seem quite not fully there lol 🤣🤣🤣 but then there's the fact that the cost of living would increase because the robots would be an additional cost incured by companies initially but they won't decrease prices over time because of the stock market. With more doctors and lawyers and engineers to chose from pay might go down possibly... It's possible to do but humans are so greedy I don't think it can happen.
Dude why so dumb. I met a lot of people and whenever someone acts stupid is stupid and everything he does is stupid. He even deeply believes in himself that he is stupid. Then i know that this guy was just told that he is stupid as a young kid and said that he is stupid until he himself believed that... and now he really is stupid because whenever some stuff in his life was needing intelligence to solve he thinks. Ah shit Hmm i almost forgot im stupid... hmm yea lets give up. I never met a person in my life that is actually stupid. But i often meet people that deeply believe that they are stupid so then they are stupid. And most people are supporting this behaviour by saying oh nono let him he is not that smart... well no he isnt because you give him this "identity" of the stupid guy. I always think of it like that: the brain of a doctor or any other smart guy is the same of an homeless. same as the arm of a bodybuilder is the same as the arm of a homeless. XD nothing against homeless. But its a muscle go train it and stop believing that your brain isnt mentally capable of being intelligent... you only think it is. Oh lol i wrote a lot sry. But that stuff makes me angry because I got told I am stupid sooo often and i understood that concept and now i go to evening school and have insanely good marks without even studying anything. And only because I stopped believing im stupid. Im done now thans
That was not the point of thia video... he didn't say have an education to make money.. he said that if 8 billion people collectively worked on solving our practical problems (energy, food, labor) we would solve them in five years instead of 500. Because as we evolve, we figure out how to automate more and more things making them cheaper and cheaper and at the end basically free, so then we ll be able to work on creative things
@@Dryaspis Humanity would crumble in those 5 years. It takes all types of people to keep the world moving. Its not just about access to education. What happens when we start to run out of food because no one is growing it? Who will keep people from committing crimes or taking advantage of each other? Who will build/repair the houses we live in? If your answer is robots, which unlucky engineers and scientists get demoted back to assembler and mechanic to build and repair said robots?
@@Dryaspis we do have 8 billion people collectively working on solving our practical problems, and the way we do that is by taking those who aren’t smart enough to be scientists, or those that are smart enough but choose not to be scientists do things like farm to provide the food to those solving our practical problem, or builders who build their homes.. since when are we not trying to solve our problems?
“Because everyone can be a scientist or engineer if they have the training” Clearly he’s never worked around the general public before. This is what happens when you only hang out with other smart people.
I was the same opinion, i always thought people are smart and can learn and do anything, but since the pandemic i worked on a farmers market and this opinion changed greatly 😂
Besides being either smart or dumb, people can have inclinations. I tried getting into IT (I do kinda work in that field just not with code) but I just couldn't do it. It's too boring. I get physically uncomfortable. I might be dumb, sure, but I don't think that's the core issue here.
Yes exactly. The old me would've been the first to defend the idea that everyone is on the same level of intelligence and all that matters is the will and mentality Turns out some people are just not, um, smart?
@@bananaOyster yes I have the same problem I think highly abstract work boring too. and maybe that has to do with me not having enough brain power to appreciate the beauty of it I do physics instead of math because its both grounded in reality but modeled by abstract ideas, the perfect balance for me
Or understands basic economic principles. For starters: more money in the economy = more inflation => higher prices & value of money ⬇️; but, no, “everybody can be rich”
@Pineapple Head so where are we digging all the resources to make all these robots? Our current supply chain can’t mine or provide the current resources and we are quickly running out of natural resources required to build the silicon that runs them.. so where are these infinite resources and manpower to mine, build, and manage these robots? Do they not break down and require spare parts? If machines did every little thing we wouldn’t be doing art, we would be repairing machines 😂😂😂😂 plus it’s impossible but sure
@@alejandropreciado1814 I’m sorry that logic and reason applied to a “thought exercise” feels like a straw man argument 😂😂 let’s just pretend the world isn’t what it really is? Work better for you bud?
Love how anyone can pretend the current system isnt just a few steps away from slavery. Working our lives away making slow progress while watching eachother slowly fade away and die. All while our bought and sold government sleeps on the job accepting slow progress for short term profits as the only possible option. We are old enough to know this is just a massive waste of our time. We could have real progress if we all wanted to.
This is the most incredibly shortsighted and broad-strokes painting of human society I have ever seen or heard in my life. My mans washed away millennia of social hierarchies, crime, mental illness, disease, and even the very concept of human ego with “well if everyone studied hard sciences, the world would be perfect.” Rich people truly know nothing about the real world.
Hard science involves psychology and neuroscience right? I imagine if more people were working those fields we would make progress in identifying,treating and preventing psychological illnesses.They might then eliminate those cases alltogether ( probably not 5 years but its such a small subsection of the population that the thinking power lost from them is almost negligable so we would still make similar progress either way).As for the social hierarchy/ego points, yeah human are greedy and egotistical but we're technically capable of displaying selflessness and humility so it remains a hopeful possiblity.In anys case this is just a thought experiment so it shouldnt be taken as a serious plan of action.
@@idontgiveadamn1000 First off psychology is not a hard science, but even if it was your point about a “negligible population” is not predicated on any facts but rather your assumptions. According to analysis published in The Lancet, over a third of the world suffers 5 or more health ailments simultaneously, while another study estimates that a fifth of the US population suffers from mental health disorders (this would actually probably be a low estimate in terms of global application given the US’ living standards). We have no idea how these ailments affect people, so the assumption that it doesn’t matter or that the rest of the world would develop even if they had no input is a stretch and not a logically sound conclusion. But let’s move on to your second point. Lets assume the health and psychological costs are “negligible” (which they are not), your point about humans “technically being capable of displaying selflessness” makes it seem like greed and selflessness are equally balanced choices that humans make. They’re not. Greed is far more common of a trait for humans to employ because ultimately it is a trait that animals are programmed to portray for survival. Without selfishness, animals do not compete to the best of their ability to keep themselves alive in a Darwinian world. Selflessness overcoming selfishness would only be theoretically possible if there was some sort of advantageous factor to selflessness that became a dominant trait, which gets me to my last reply: social hierarchies. You didn’t actually address this properly in your response, but I hope you realize the difficulty of social hierarchies isn’t just it’s social factors, but the fact that it allows money as a concept to exist. If everyone had money, and everyone was in the top 1%, basic capitalist economics says that no ONE is in the 1%. Money essentially becomes worthless at that point; it’s only value comes from manufactured scarcity and government oversight; a world where “everyone is rich” as stated in the video here means that money no longer functions the way it does right now. The solution to our poor living standards and money problems is not “studying hard sciences”. This is the mindset of engineering students with a chip on their shoulder who think they’re better than everyone because indeed.com says they’ll have the biggest salary of all their friends after graduation. The only real way to address these things, to a global audience, is to rethink how the systems themselves work and fix the problems that allow 1% of the world to own 90% of the wealth. But given the grip that governments and the wealthy have on these systems, and the resources they have to continue this gap for their own benefits, it’s unlikely.
@@abhayglal there's too much to read here given that I have ADHD, but from what I did see theres just one thing I have to say. Psychology is objectively a hard science, period. I don't know what argument you have for why you think it's not and I honestly don't think I can focus my kind for long enough to read it, but for once I don't think it matters. Psychology is a hard science based on scientific study and empirical evidence. The people that think it's not don't know what Psychology is. The people that say it's not a hard science are usually basing their information off of the internet tendency to make it into a pseudoscience. "Psychology fact!: if your boyfriend looks at his phone, he's cheating! Don't ask for sources, that's just how it is". People on the internet just make shit up and call it Psychology. That's not what Psychology is. If you try to study Psychology, the first thing youll find is that psychologist disagree with that type of "psychology" and are only interested in empirical and quantitative evidence, just a much so as a chemesist, physicist, etc. True Psychology is a hard scientist, internet Psychology is pseudoscience. It's similar to the difference between astronomy (a hard science) and astrology (a fantasy). You're thinking astrology; think astronomy
@@jonathandavis8051 true psychology has almost nothing to it though. It’s a field in its infant stages with little to no understanding and what we do know about it doesn’t apply to everyone or everything meaning it is not a hard science. There are very few true hard things we know about human psychology or how our brains function on a mental level. Chemically sure but that’s more biochemistry not psychology. And biochemistry is a hard science not psychology
@@wamsly2334 This, bro. I've been a wildland firefighter and instructor for over 12 years. Some people are just unfathomably incapable, and you can't experience this until you meet them.
Lol, do you even know how the device you're using was made? I'll give you a hint, they weren't educated. Repetition doesn't require intelligence, quite the opposite actually
He’s leaving out the social aspect of the human “ pissing contest” that has inflicted humans for 1000s of years now, will always be the determining factor of wealth and resource distribution. The utopia he speaks of, would only exist if every human looked the same, ,believed the same things, and had the same values on life. Humans thirst for self preservation will always lead to someone/something suffering
@@justifano7046 Tell that to a Jewish or Muslim doctor or professor. Education doesn’t weeded out the lust to be top dog or the leader. Just like it’s impossible to truly domesticate a Lion, I think world peace and a end to global poverty is impossible, it’s in human nature to practice self preservation at all costs, so land, resources and people will always be pillaged.
Yes, and the worse thing is that people just refuse to acknowledge that we are animals, and therefore have impulses that animals have too that are hardwired into our DNA and no matter education certain things can't be changed
Robots and aliens are the solution for the laziness of humans? Is that what rich means? I thought rich is when you have considerably more money than the average person. In africa, you are rich if you have a restaurant, a car, a house, and some clothes.
@@kelemenraul8859 That's the story, not the reality. Solution to laziness? Why do we think we need that? Because we want to achieve more? Well, then we can get up and do something. That's the solution, of course. The point is to transfer all the productive work to machines so we can work on what want to. Will that be a good thing entirely? No. Nothing is 100% "good". In fact, most things are an equal balance of yum and yuck. The point is to move us away from unhealthy things like working a job your whole life which you hate until you retire with lots of money, and no health nor life left to spend it. What a stupid idea, right?
Scientist and engineer as 1st jobs and all the rest as second jobs...then his plan could work. Say, 3 days in the 1st job and 2 days in the second. That way, society will still function.
"Imagine if everyone owned a small rectangle that fit in your pocket with unlimited access to the world's information and the ability to communicate instantly and conduct transactions instantly. We would have so much time for self-improvement and professional development. Everyone can be rich, everyone."
I work in automation, and it's just not as easy as "if everyone was educated". Just ask Elon, the model 3 factory was supposed to be 100% automated, today it's not even close.
Exactly. That's because there's only ONE ELON. This guy is imagining 7.5 billion Elons. The problem is... even if we were all like Elon we won't be doing much. We'd all be masturbating on spaceships and just traveling around in space.
I mean it’s 2022 and learning to code is literally free! You can be job ready in a year or so - people are doing this. My housemate went from business to date science in 6 months and almost doubled his salary and he isn’t that intelligent but he has a strong work ethic
@voidwalker Lol it's true though. That's exactly what would happen if we were all like Elon Musk. Space orgies and stuff until we find a planet or something.
True but good engineers make more wealth for everyone. One man made the printing press. Guy single handily made the transfer of information over time exponentially easier. The thing is it's a mixture of creative and smart people in one. How many elon musks are out there. It would be easier to find those people and put them to work. Average engineers are not what make a company or a society thrive. It's the exceptional ones.
Just from not even a engineer standpoint let’s say a kitchen first you need to automate cooking then you need to automate dish cleaning then you need to automate delivery and cleaning even if you were to do all of these things. There would be break-ins and technicians would need to come in to service equipment most likely every week or month. It’s a great idea in concept but even Amazon’s mostly automated shop I think cost 1$ million $ to setup (in other words it’s highly expensive to even get something partially automated, great idea highly improbably though)
He's talking about gearing society toward developing technology to replace/manage every job and activity that isn't related to STEM. This has nothing to do with monetary wealth and is actually closely related to what would need to occur to make a modern socialist society that allocates resources by need and societal benefit rather than by monetary incentive.
Absolutely. I wish we could live in the world you just described. But the second you say that someone has to say “well that’s just because your lazy and don’t want to work”… no I want to work towards my own personal goals and not to make money just to live in this shit society. I’m so tired of people sitting on their high horse just because they work themselves to death. Humans were not built for this, we created it. So why can’t we create something different? A better society
Honestly people haven't figured it out yet when somebody has a lot of money it has to come from somewhere else from someone else. It's a hierarchy rich people are at the top the government's near the top homeless people at the bottom right next to the third world countries. Yes it is possible for a country like America to have a bunch of rich people and no homeless and no crime but that means another country is suffering. This is exactly why the United States right now is considered to be one of the highest world powers is because the vast majority of its manufacturing comes from sweatshops in third world countries. So all you've really done is shifted the hierarchy from your own border to another border
It is possible for everyone to be rich the only problem is there are people in this world that have so much money that it could last 10 generations let’s 10 generations of a family not doing anything
You just big dumb. He is explaining that if we worked towards a more autonomous future that we would be able to enjoy the fruits of our labor. Buying luxury items wouldn’t be so difficult because it would be dirt cheap to make. Money would mostly lose value and your needs would be fulfilled. I’d say he’s a little optimistic and utopic but there’s some truth in this
Deadass. If you don’t have the education, knowledge, skill, requirements, financial status, luck and willpower: You simply can’t do it. It’s not just education
He's talking about a post-scarcity world where people can do meaningful work because all the hard shit is handled by machines, think Star Trek. Kinda dig it but we're a long way out.
We really arent. All of the technology and AI already exists. Small groups of rich individuals however do not want the staus quo tochange. Its why we are still trying to get the cold war started up again.
@@vicious12394 for one, AI isn't quite there yet. Not for the mass scale implied in this scenario. The other problem is resource scarcity. That's the main thing holding us back right now. Material costs are just too high for us to go to almost entirely machine production methods in a timely fashion. It will take a long time for that transfer to happen without massive injection of valuable raw materials. That will happen in the near future though with asteroid mining. So I personally don't think a post-scarcity society is very far away, at least in the western world. Oh and the cold never really stopped in reckon, just had a bit of a down period through the late 20th, early 21st century
@@Patrick-zr8tv personally i think resources aren't the problem, resource distribution and waste is the problem. Our society is structured to encourage massive ammounts of hording and to discard resources if it isnt profitable enough to reuse them. Mining the asteroid belt would be a disaster if we did it with the current capitalist ecconomic model we have.
@@vicious12394 it's still way further off than you think. Robots are a good example, we don't really have powerful enough robots to work for hours on end without recharging. Once we get robots that only need to be recharged every few days or every week, everything is going to change. Like everything. Every manual labor job is going to disappear, every landscaper, shelf stocker, factory worker, self driving will be a bit different but you get the idea.
@@sagargiri3145 the UD army conducted enough experiments to find out that it would be more harmful for them than beneficial to employ people without an IQ above about 83...the army wants everyone...but can't take them because they are sure that they don't have a job they would do successfully..sad truth
@Hüsamettin Karakeci historical fact would like to disagree. Sociology isn't nearly as old as civilization. It was made in 1838. Political Science in around 1860. I know enough about social science to say that it's not a societal need; it's a luxury. It shouldn't even be called a science. Mostly, it is the idle ponderings of wealthy elites about the lives of the common person and how to break them into statistical blocks based on arbitrary criteria. The start of social research is academic, and the end result is academic, a completed loop of superfluous information. Clincial psychology does a far better job. No political, medical, legal, or scientific body makes true use of social science. The most useful social science degree is in HR.
@@snoweefrost4412 Sociology is as old as human consciousness. It began the first person thought “why do people act in x way?” It’s used to understand predictable behavior, either so it can be replicated, predicted, or changed. Criminology, combat tactics, marketing, governance, education, customer service, international politics, economics, city planning-all these things are key components to the societies we live in and they all stand on the shoulders of sociological thinkers since the dawn of civilization. Anyone who fails to see the value of sociology and thinks that STEM is all you need is ironically someone who has fallen prey to a culture that wants to profit off of you without you ever figuring out how the game really works. And they use sociology to trick you into it.
@Brian Briones Old as human consciousness? We're talking about, or at least I thought we were, reality, not some faux religious creation story. Sociology is a barely discernable collection of hypotheses and academic ego. That's all.
It's called dreaming of a better reality rather than accepting the fact of our inevitable fate that work with slow progress is just a waste of our time. We need to remove the bottleneck and see real change. Our bought and paid government is certainly the bottleneck.
@@princeamg loathing for lost causes from experience i see, when you are all ready lost there’s know experience that it derives from aka source…its a double edged sword and you are just an example by the reasoning of how you do it not what you do so it is not what you do it’s how you do it
Dr. - so your bill for the life saving surgery after insurance is 70k.. Me-..hmm well I'm rich where it matters most. Here's 80k in state of mind money. Keep the change. Dr-..
i mean he literally said "if we could wave a wand" i dont really see how he thinks the world is easy he just gave an example like what if it was that easy. keep up bro
Thought experiments allow us freedom to imagine potential futures. And although I do think he is far removed from reality, his argument that everyone can and should be educated is a very relevant one, in my opinion.
The dumbest shit I've ever heard always comes from smart people. When you're intelligent you lose perspective. Most people lose IQ points 10 minutes in to introduction to C++
@@gg-gamers you're the slow one. Anyone can learn comp sci with enough training. You just don't wanna put in the work over time. Most just quit when it gets hard. Not because they can't
@@joys8634 the question is how much is enough education? If it takes 20 years to teach someone to be a programmer versus someone who takes 4 to know just as much and be just as effective it isn’t worth it.
What if as a govermemt you urged the public to assist their country in explaining to their kids that they should work as an engineer or scientists so that the work will be a better place.
@@rekrn12345 Not necessarily, there’s a wide array of intelligence factors. They don’t have to be academically gifted necessarily. Engineer is very broad, but having been given the education and motivation I think the majority of the population could fill a role in technological advancement. But if you mean like they’re stupid in the sense that you don’t like their decisions or opinions, I don’t know how to change that.
@@fredriksvard2603 I think his point was that after we all use our collective efforts to automate as much shit as we can, we then focus on the shit you that can't be automated e.g designers.
@@MadManMitch The new scientist/engineer society will take several years to provide the full automation described, if that is even possible (I actually suspect complete automation in the way described is not possible). In that time who will provide the absolutely necessary services? Society would collapse before it realizes its utopian advancement.
He should read an economics textbook. Even if everyone was an engineer, most would still be put in low wage jobs as the degree loses its value and the low wage jobs are still necessary.
His point is if we had more engineers and scientists and programmers we could accelerate the robot revolution and have all occupations automated within years, after which people can transition to art and social sciences.
You got it wrong bro. He is talking about complete automation. All work would be done by machines and human beings would only have to maintain the machines. Just that everyone will have to be trained to maintain these machines. Just like a farmer maintains food crops while food crops produce food on its own.
@@xshxr I wouldn't say they need other people for fulfillment, but it is clear that the quality of our relationships are directly correlated to our happiness. And when academia and amassed wisdom take on the central core of our identities, It is all to easy to either have our ego destroyed, or to allow our pride to hinder our growth as a species, being students of humankind has had no detrimental effects on humanity IMHO, however I would argue that it is the pursuit of knowledge and understanding above the pursuit of people that has caused divides between societal classes, cultures and nations for that matter.
Wealth does not equal currency. I'm not saying this guy is correct but the idea that everyone can be rich is one hundred percent true. Every year we get closer and closer to that goal. Globally, the rich get richer every year AND the poor get richer every year. Global poverty has never been lower than it is today. Everyone is getting wealthier and nothing has happened to the "value of wealth"
@@shush6711 yeah let’s all get educated to advance society so that way the rich could devalue our education and have robots do everything while most of the country remained homeless cause that’s capitalism
This techno utopian mindset has a lot of pitfalls. I’m not completely convinced with the argument that everyone can be trained or inclined to be educated in it either. It’s more than education because even that of itself has a lot of issues at the institutional level
Ignoring this creative idea that could make the world a better place because you don’t believe everyone could be educated. It sounds like u are the problem
@@Conqueefstador the problem is many would prefer to be uneducated and live on . It will mock the mindset of those who are working hard in their education
social status s quite important, u can be miserable, but if u're the best of ur group, u're pretty much the king and u feel like one, but if u live in a wealthy society with hot water on demand , food on demand, worm shelter, pretty much luxury, still doesn't cut it when the people u're looking at seem to have a little more. that's nature 's doing.
Take what he’s saying with a grain of salt and figuratively. His message is not wrong though. If everyone truly strives for greatness, society would advanced stupidly fast. I also agree any homeless person off the street can be writing code with some basic education and give value to society. It highly impractical but just food for thought
If everyone get good jobs then they wont be good Jobs anymore it will become the ”normal” job and wont pay as good as it pays today . The thing is it pays so good right now because not everyone can do it and Ye as this guy say ”anyone” can do it or whatever but it just doesnt work like that inflation and demand comes in
I feel like saying basic education is dumbing down the process of learning how to code. Learning any kind of basic code seems pretty useless to me. Wouldn’t coding something that’s useful to someone require more than just a basic understand of coding?
Those that are exceptional at any profession are intensely intuitively drawn towards said profession. Yes, anyone with a brain can “learn” how to do anything, but without a true, deep interest, it’s very difficult to put in the hours that are required to develop exceptional ability. In order to serve others do what you’re intuitively interested in.
Yep, I’ve heard the term “you can’t make a rocket scientist out of a trucker, and you can’t make a trucker out of a rocket scientist” many times when I was young, there’s a reason people chose to be the “prestigious” jobs like lawyer or professor and even the gritty jobs like morticians or waste management. Every job is essential to the overall success of a society and different people chose to do those jobs
If you have played any strategy management games with limited resources, you know once the machines get unlocked and built. The people start “mysteriously” dying until there are only the necessary people left.
I love how I watched this twice and thought this was interesting. Maybe even truthful. Then I clicked the comment section and started dying of laugher because everyone is absolutely shredding this video.😂
It reminds me of the time my college professor like Chicano history professor with a PhD from Berkeley and two masters from UCLA told me when I was feeling down because I couldn't understand something I was just like I'm not smart like you he looked at me he said I'm not smart I'm trained and a month later he looked at me with pride in his eyes and said it now you understand and you're a scholar from this day forward thank you Ronald W Lopez head director of the Chicano studies at Sonoma State Viva La Raza all the children the inner city ghetto we're giving a private school education and tell somebody young age that they were going to go to an ivy league university imagine how many Geniuses we would have how many diseases we would have been cured imagine how many people died in fell into the violence of the inner city there are no dead in prison for life or lost to drug addiction imagine how many people how many children weren't allowed to reach their potential because as a flood of crack cocaine in inner-city ghettos Across America during the late 70s early 80s amazing how many people genius is one allowed to flourish because of the people control the 1%
Me too. They’re inherently illogical and appeal to the pseudo-intellectual, superficial douchebags obsessed with “the grind” who believe anything dumb like this is in any way profound. Anyone who points out their fragile reality as sheep is just a “hater” or “unsuccessful in their life”, it’s hilarious.
@@M.S.G.95 Man. What you said “anyone who points out their fragile reality is serve as sheep or haters.” The realist shit I ever seen. Perfectly sums up all the 1% that tell normal people to “get on the grind” and “hard work” “HUSTLE HUSTLE HUSTLE.”
“In this world wherever there is light, there are also shadows..” as nice as this sounds we still cannot live in actual peace because of the wrong hands and twisted people.
So many of these comments on UA-cam these days. The pandemic has really done a number on people. But I guess we may as well comment on the internet, stand down and stay scared right?
Live the rest of your life awaiting an “inevitable” bad ending or crooked villain in the story, and you’ll never appreciate the real GOOD that we could all achieve. So many people are so quick to shut down and point out problems in the “best case scenario” subconsciously having a bias and leading to more skepticism than actual progress. I believe everyone has a right to their own opinion, but not everyone’s opinion has the right to be respected. Some people won’t understand that but it is what it is. Stay curious :)
what are you even saying? What is getting a man? There are homophobes, there are racists, there are nationalists, religious extremists that'd slit my throat for my beliefs. There's no "crooked ending" to everything, but there's plenty of crooked shit. Everyone can have their own beliefs, and no we won't respect them, sure but let's not pretend like that solves anything.
Bruhhh the fact that this dude's being serious is mind blowing, i know this dude would starta billion person cult just to make his dream comes true you can even see it in his eyes
This is a misleading clip out of his podcast , read more of tweets on Twitter . He is very famous ( Naval ) and his thoughts are absolute mind boggling good advice
Which robot's job do you want to do? Do you want to clean streets, drive people around, work in a steel mill? You won't have to; you could instead spend your time applying yourself to intellectual discovery. In such a society wherein the goal is to explore the subjects of scientific fields, we should have no use for money. Employment is replaced by occupation (the principle business of one's life).
@@Ubersnipe I don't think everyone would want to, nor really even be able to perform any significant degree. Not all truckers hate being truckers, not all taxi drivers hate being taxi drivers, and not all factory workers hate that either. Some simply genuinely enjoy such work. Assuming that everyone does so because they "have" to shows a bias towards the kind of work you enjoy yourself. There are many kinds of people who are good at and enjoy many different things. If everyone was forced to do the same thing, I doubt that would be a real improvement. At least in my mind.
@@markdallen4018 what happens to uneducated people? (not because they won't learn but they are struggling to learn),no job opportunities for the uneducated,massive suicide cases(failing school means failing in life ) he make it sounds positive but neglect the consequences
@@ClemintineCake yeah sure lol, have you ever been to a factory? You think we would be living the life we’re living without robots in all the mega factories? Without automated robots you wouldn’t have a car and wouldn’t be able to order shit online. Lots of things you wouldn’t be able to do
@Mark Dallen lets say there are 15.000 differens jobs in the world that'll all need to be automated, some are easy and some are extremely difficult to automate. with 7.7 billion engineers and scientists and 15.000 jobs to be automated, they could be split in teams on 500.000 people. coordination is a major issue right off the bat. all these people cant be working on the exact same thing or there will be issues. but Assuming they are able to pull it off, now we have the bigger issue. Where are we going to produce all of these things, we'd need millions of factories to manufacture all of these things. you might think; robots. but it's the same issue, we need to manufacture all the robots in order for them to work and before that, they need be designed. in short there is absolutly no way we'd be able to acomplish all of this in 5 years, not even in 50 years. and these are only a few of the issues
As always, you've missed the point. It's a *thought experiment* you dumbass. The conjecture goes, if we had a magic wand to educate everyone, we would all be rich. Since we don't have that magic wand, we'll have to do it manually. It'll take longer but it's what we should aim to do, you see?
I disagree, simply on a supply and demand level. The magic wand would have to be for the robots to show up. Because there are only so many hard science jobs available at this point. So you flood the market and those jobs are not wealth producing. Let's not even mention thay for every robot you would need technicians/trades people. And we aren't getting fully automated restaurants anytime soon. Annnnnd then we are still in a class system and you come back to where we are right now. Educated people serving food to.pay off students debts. I think this stand point is completely ignorant of basic supply and demand principles. Not to mention the basic need for social sciences. Oh and educators. You'll still need those because people keep being born and getting sick. So now you need doctors...... The water shed on this is rediculous
@Mariam Toma No kidding, and people are still generating trash, eating food and shitting into sewer systems. You need people to do jobs. The first red flag was everyone can be rich off of a tech degree, the second and most glaring was his wholesale dismissal on the family of science that tells *us* how *we* function.
You guys do not understand his point at all. He doesn't mean rich in terms of money, what he's saying if all of humanity put its focus into these sciences all humans can live a better life. And to be fair it's only a thought excersise, it is interesting to think what humans would be capable of with the man power of 8 billion people fully educated and a good ability to cooperate.
@@kdote398 I see what you're saying. But I think the thought experiment doesn't really take in to account peoples passions. Education isn't for everyone. Some people have a passion for fixing trucks, some people have a passion for fishing. Educating people isn't going to change people's hearts and what they are passionate about.
Nobody...that's the thing dude...nobody would be doing stuff for money anymore. When people have abundance of something, why would they work for it anymore? Ever heard of someone working really hard to get fresh air??
For every "creative" person in a university you need thousands of average people just making sure food shelter and powers available, this man doesnt appreciate nor recognise the unseen hard work of others.
@@VoxDeserta Were going to have fully automated flights to get avocados to London? Have robots do the scheduled maintenence on the robo planes? invent robots that fix those robots too? He's thinking we're just a 100% population of uni grads away from the jetsons and he's wrong.
He is talking about hard sciences like microbiology and nuclear physics not even social sciences. These aren't the "creative" majors unis push out with little to no actual worth and weight in knowledge.
@@masteroogway6660 it is a shame that your expectations are so low. What you've just said isn't even too far fetched for our sad fucking world right now much less the magic wand world of trained engineers and scientists
Engineers and scientists make that hard work much much easier. Thousands of farmers used to be needed to work a plot of land. Now you give 1 or two people agricultural machines and a fucking tractor and they're 300% more efficient. Why? Mechanical engineers, botanists, and agricultural scientists did the hard thinking to that hard work is no longer such a fucking WASTE OF HUMAN TIME AND RESOURCES
“Everybody can be rich.” But theoretically that’s an absolute impossibility in a capitalist economy. If everyone had the same credentials then almost everybody except the best of the best would be unemployed.
@@sneakyonthebeat with no way to ensure the means of production are in the hands of the many instead of the few capitalism or worse will be upheld. There is no reason to believe when automation comes that us commonfolk will benefit beyond being able to buy the next version microwaves and fridges and shit.
People don't realize we're using cars, motorcycle, plane, and many other tools which is technology. And in the past it would be impossible and difficult for people to understand it. So it's true. It's funny how people don't realize it
As a mechanical engineering student, I strongly disagree. Ever since primary school, I could see my self have a way easier way understanding physics and mathematics than a lot of my classmates and by the years the gap just grew. Don't get me wrong, I put in a lot of work but I don't think this is for anybody or that anybody could do it if they studied. No they can't. Same way u don't go to the NBA if ur 5'5 with bad genetics.
@@kahrs4465 too bad he is the only player ever, which make's him an exception. Also I assure you genetically he's one in a billion, and that is proven by the fact that he could dunk with ease and even won a dunk contest even though he was so short. Do your research brother.
@@alexandroskoliousis975 You just said that genetics was a obstacle to play in the NBA. (height) then you “assure me” that’s “he’s gifted and one in a billion” My point is, if you’re a healthy human being you can do and be what the fuck you want.
@@kahrs4465 well genetics do not only play a role in height but athleticism too. Bottom line is u can be everything u want indeed, but let's not fool ourselves and understand that it's not the same for everybody.
@@ProjectBlackweather Big businesses fall when they're in the wrong hands. Small businesses scale when they're in the right hands Sure some people inherit riches, but if they dont use their head, that inheritance doesn't stick for long.
Everyone can be rich as long as they disregard what they would like to do for their lives and they're educated in a few specific fields, a luxury many people can't afford. Disregarding all those glaring caveats, everyone can be rich
Well no, it just requires redistribution of wealth and resources. Its not impossible to do, its just that if you tried that people would be screaming about muh freedoms and communism, whilst doing 9 -9 living in their 1 bedroom 2k a month hovel.
I’ve met a good amount of people in my life that I’m 100% confident could NEVER learn a difficult skill, no matter how long they studied or practiced. Some people are not as mentally capable as others, there really are people that are just stupid. No disabilities or anything, just plain dumb and it’s not their fault, it’s just genetics.
@@qasw287 or maybe the people teaching are not good at teaching, or these people need to be taught in different ways. Ill tell you that i thought i was a dumb mofo due to my horrible grades in school. I almost didn't try college because I didn't think i was capable of it due to my history of horrible grades. Going into college, I approached learning in a different way than i previously did. When i attended classes, i would leave the class not really knowing wtf the teacher was saying. This was the same cycle being repeated in the past. So, i started to read the text books, looked online for different and more clear explanations of the topics, went to one-on-one tutoring. Instead if just relying on the teacher's lectures, i found another way to understand what i needed to learn. Had i not done this, i would not have passed all my classes with A's. So, im not buying your beliefs.
@@nonenone2669 so what you’re saying is, due to your anecdotal evidence with a problem that many people have (feeling like a dumb mofo due to bad grades) that this situation can be generalized to all of society? It seems like your logic is the exact same as the people you try to refute. Assuming everyone has a similar capability or experience as you doesn’t really achieve or prove anything.
It’s also a matter of interests. If you made everyone’s dream job a STEM job then how much interest would they actually have in creative pursuits outside of STEM
@@abhiroopdeyrocks everyone in high end STEM jobs are creative. You don't make revolutionary advances or solve difficult problems through memorisation and learning by rote.
@@markdallen4018 what I’m getting at is that if you only have scientists the only commodity available will be science. We might get by cause STEM is a pretty broad umbrella but it might also be the case that we end up with all miller’s and no wheat. You also have the problem of there being a limit on how many scientists and engineers you actually need to solve all of the worlds problems, cause I guarantee that that number is less than how many people there are.
@@sebibence02 that is absolutely correct. That’s what the last bit of my statement makes reference to in that the only creative pursuits of any value in this hypothetical world are science related ones
My man forgot that humans are greedy creatures. No matter how much we try there will always be a person that will want to have everything under his/her control and probably end up with destruction of the society of that time. I belive in the concept of "hard times make tough people. Tough people make easy times. Easy times make weak people. Weak people make tough times, and that's a circle that will go on forever..". And even if "tough people" try to turn "weak people" into "tough people" , the "weak" people won't truly understand and belive the reason why they have to be strong, since they live in an "easy time" and don't know what "tough times" are truly like. Of course, there are always exceptions of "tough people" at the "eazy times" , but they are not enough to Keep the "easy times" from changing to "tough times" After a few generations, the circles always continues.
@@Noname2004kurdish uhhhh... Quite the opposite dude . I wanted to, but I didn't want a guy to call me sexist or something (for example ; wOmen aLsO DeStrOyeD oUr wOrlD as MuCh As We mEn diD!!! 😠) . Plus ! Just because men are the cruelest in the history's past doesn't mean that they will keep being the cruelest ones in the future . Now with gender equality rising, women can also destroy humanity.......for some reason, i feel bad about explaining it. I feel like I support the destruction of our current world (which I don't) 😅
People will do that if they are workaholics or competitive or if they wanted to date someone respectable. its kinda messed up to assume its out of greed...
After you take your last breath are you going to heaven or hell? Please ask yourself that question now. Jesus can save your soul from hell. He will forgive your sins. He said whoever calls upon his name shall be saved. Call upon Jesus today. Repent and believe the gospel.
Depends if this “creative jobs” would be paying you with money to buy your food and bills, else we would be in misery and not living in a wonderful society at all, and that is what scares me. The time to invest your money is now. I work in an IT company and I clearly can see how robots and automatic processes can substitute us, even in creativity level, as there are AIs able to generate millions and millions of random ideas and an “control AI” (which is based on what we think is good) says if that is close to what we would like or not...
@@Phatal001 it’s awesome, the amount of diversity in both knowledge and experiences from one and another we have in it is one of the things that amazes me, it’s like an university were you spend most of the time making projects and get paid for it. I also have the opportunity to speak with different clients (which are usually stores), answering their questions and fixing communication problems of our technologies on their end. But many of our tasks there can be automated and we are aiming for that, where in a press of a button or two (changing like 2 params or so), we are able to execute the whole task that would take the entire day for doing it.
@@kaisolomon5187 that is the point, so in a future where the majority of the working class gets substituted by robots (like Amazon is doing right now) we will still have an income. Or else we need to hope for a new economical system that food is gonna be given for free or, like Elon Musk said, that the government gives “free money” for its population.
I'm sure this makes more sense when you listen to the whole conversation, but he literally says "we can all be rich" and "robots will replace our entire labor force" within 30 seconds.
Not everyone can be rich it's simple. When everyone is rich, nobody is rich because all have the same amount of money. So all people are equal. But every human can have a dignified and happy Life. Being rich =/= good life.
He just shattered your definition of the phrase "making a living" time to scoop Up Or ReForm your interpreted meaning bruv... you missed the 1 variable that is 🗝Creative living... basic living in our future scenario is already made, "we will have jobs researching & entertaining each other" the Only ones at threat of Making a living harder are the ones who are not actual living... your comment speaks in defense of mindless bots... why sat urn ate it like that? 👍
Even Musk said this. There will be a time in the near future where there are more people than jobs available due to technology. It’s inevitable. And either you open up outlets in research and the arts, or you start offing people… possibly through a global emergency of sorts 🤷🏻♂️
I think hes trying to say if we pushed science and engineering so much in 5 years because everyone is doing it, it would advance so much. Meaning we would have all these high tech machines to do the jobs he said. However just like cheap labour in Asia has destroyed production in the west. Unless the money saved by these computors/robots isnt investing back into people and education. It would be even worse than now in terms of jobs poverty etc.
@@Mazuto808 thank you. It's work hard now, play hard later. It isn't possible for everyone to become an engineer/scientist though, some kids simply don't have the aptitude. But if we had a lot more this would become a reality much quicker.
@@joseph5900 those people are already great at things like maths. No, not anyone can get a CS degree. I've got first hand experience teaching, some people aren't built for stem like others are. Maybe if a certain work ethic was built into them from a young age, but some kids genuinely have a natural aptitude for certain sciences. I've personally taught kids first hand, there's 100% a natural part of the intelligence we possess. Then again, he did say have some technical knowledge, not be insanely good at it. Which is think is doable for most people. Then if they could handle the simpler jobs it would still speed the process along.
Who would cultivate, harvest, plant your produce? Please don't tell me robots! There are jobs that require human input or else society cannot function. This guy lives in a dream world!
When all is said and done with technology, musicians will be of the last few occupations humans are necessary for. I won't live that long, but damn I envy the ones that take that spot
Watch More from Academy of Wealth
🔵 The Untold Twitter Story: Scandal, Backstabs and Karma ua-cam.com/video/Dc5wC9qCvZs/v-deo.html
🔴 Uber: The Greatest MAFIA Plot of All Time ua-cam.com/video/yT7ZR-J-2IY/v-deo.html
🟢 How Starbucks Took Over the World! ua-cam.com/video/LQdwrLkPzJI/v-deo.html
📺 Visit Our Channel More: www.youtube.com/@academyofwealth
Yeah, we're just going to let the slaves do all the work since they're not "human" and therefore don't "think" or "have feelings". You are an encyclopedia that can search itself and be creative with that knowledge, there is no difference except the existence of a soul (as far as we know), but that doesn't make them unworthy of human rights.
The fact that nobody talks about the forbidden book Derp Money speaks volumes about how people are stuck in a trance
It's great book if you want to know how to get your life better and get the money you always wanted, these people always talk shit and they didn't even buy it
@@markjones42115 Yes it is really good book for your first business straight to business no bullshits
Bot comments guys don't trust
Few years from now, this song will just be a single note
i was thinking that 🤣🤣🤣
Soon it will just summon chtulhu
Fucking hilarious😂😂😂
I have to be honest though, this is the best version I’ve heard. It’s not annoying like the others and sounds good.
Give me your opinions on this ua-cam.com/video/H2WPzLvykbI/v-deo.html ..
There isn’t a robot in the world who can make a triple decker PB&J like me.
If you don't challenge Musk to create you one, you're a pussy
Peanut butter Nutella, trust me dude.
@@j.l.atheprodigy add 2 dill pickles and ranch… TRUST bro 😩
@@eyesack3606 Bet🤙
@@eyesack3606 Yo...
😅 what the hell is happening in this comment section. Thats the strangest thing I've read today. I'll try it
If everybody is rich, nobody is “rich”
Perhaps looking at "rich" as "your standing versus others" is why poverty isn't solved :)
@@derekcrane9929 This is literally basic economics. Having an abundance of material goods because of industrialization for everyone is not the same as being rich.
And no he's wrong because when everybody is sciencing somebody still has to do the other jobs in the meantime.
@Z R you missed the greater point though. The point was the more educated a society can become, the extreme version of that would be having no need for those "other jobs". I'm not one to argue on youtube, but it's definitely worth thinking through his concepts versus the exact idea.
I think you are missing the point due to some semantical hangup.
@@derekcrane9929 people like this other guy are why we need magic wands to wave away the world's problems.
"Yes, everybody can be rich, hear me out. Just imagine theres a magical wand..."
😅😅😅
🤣
You know it's going to be good when he says that lol
Nothing to do with magic, he is telling facts.. The problem is in governments... Education have to have much higher priority.. They shoud increase investments in instructions because thats the real problem of humanity today
It is ignorant of you thinking that based on the tip of the iceberg. Listen to that podcast and your perspective would be changed
I'm sure this guy would be great at starting his own cult.
Oof
his eyes are spinning spirals lol
He's actually talking about real economic ideology, and had an excellent point about post scarcity society where people can all do things they enjoy because robots handle the work. This economic model requires some kind of universal income though.
He’s not wrong tho
he looks like he already has
If someone slows down this song any more there is going to be a rift in the universe
Lmao underrated comment
Lmfao
🤣
Glad someone noticed this too, this song has been stretched out like the @$$ of p*
LMFAO underrated
"When everyone's special, nobody is."
Yup a real terrible and uneducated quote
This like saying "when everyone's stupid, nobody is" lmao 🤣
That's literally impossible. This only applies if there's only one thing to be good at. But there's many things to specialize in, so this will never be true.
@@petermladenov6065 Your spelling is special though.
Why do somebody have to be “special”? People should just accept that we all are the same damn lump of meat in different forms. The only “value” separating people is whether or not they contribute making the world and the human experience better for all.
"It really is just education!"
"But first we gotta wave a magic wand."
what part of self educating do you not get? He is Indian, he probably assumed people know youtube lectures.
@@samahirrao ah yes go learn engineering from youtube
Ohhhh yeah that’s magic wand 🤣🤣😂😂
@@TospikKing why not? You can learn anything in the world for free online, you might not get a certificate or a diploma to hang on your wall, but you can still know the same knowledge as someone who has. It wouldn’t cost you a single penny.
@@HRHMANSOUR
The best argument would be to take the “educated” person who disagrees and have them try to pass all the exams they took to get their degree. They had to of retained the knowledge right.
“Everyone can be rich”
Step 1: Tomorrow we wave a magic wand 🪄
He's saying people can hypothetically all be rich, there's nothing wrong with that
@@tibofordeyn1529 you know what rich means? Rich fucking means having more fucking money than a majority of fucking people that fucking have to work hard all fucking life for a living.
Hypothetically speaking if everyone is rich, you can't define that as rich as there's not much pay gap between them. And you know what can it be called? Idk, we should set up a term for that as there's no one poorer or richer than anyone. And there's just so much wrong in this guy's imagination, economy doesn't work like that
@@durganaveen4152 He is just saying if there were less troglodytes like you in the world, it would be easy.
@@gdgd5194 maybe you should ask yourself what you have contributed to this world. Lemme guess, shaming people you don't like? If you don't have a point to make, atleast try not to be a hypocrite.
@@durganaveen4152 Maybe you should try to go on Joe Rogan's show and show everyone how your imagination is so much better than that man's instead of bein a hypocrite and shaming a random person you don't like on comments?
"Everyone can be rich", everyone must be educated with "Hard Sciences"
Law of demand and supply: Am I a joke to you?
Well said
I think he meant no body is going to be in poverty where they cannot afford food. If food is made by robots then it'll essentially be very cheap.
@@MyTopAnime Still a fantasy.
the point he is trying to make is that everything will be automated. Think WALL-E, if robots do everything for free and renewable energy is completely practical, there is enough robots we could theoretically have unlimited supply. The issue is without purpose many people get either lazy or depressed or both.
@@gilbertlopez literally wall-e is probably gonna become a reality everything is so easy now people are getting paid to not work and we’re close to creating almost human like robots that could replace us shits kinda scary if you ask me
Forget engineering, tomorrow we all start practicing with wands. Remember guys: le-vi-O-sah not le-vi-o-SAH
you're going to poke someones eye out
I'm going to bed.
@@Melionyo before either one of you have another bright idea to get us killed, or worse EXPELLED
I love this comment section 😍😍😍😍🥺🥺
@@tee26_05 you need to sort out your priorities.
I love these shorts. Some successful guy talking far out of his element.
Seriously
Jimmy..ua-cam.com/video/QYIcUPkjGY0/v-deo.html
He did say "imagine" 😂
Probably the reason he's successful and you're not... 🤔
@@tiffanysmith1465 lol I'm a software developer. I'm exactly where I want to be in life, thanks.
Only takes a minute to realize this is a ridiculous thought and a ridiculous conclusion.
I guess this dude hasn’t met a lot of people
Some people are artificially limited by their upbringing and environment. It doesn't mean they lack the capacity to learn
ok thanks to the internet I have met people that seem quite not fully there lol 🤣🤣🤣 but then there's the fact that the cost of living would increase because the robots would be an additional cost incured by companies initially but they won't decrease prices over time because of the stock market. With more doctors and lawyers and engineers to chose from pay might go down possibly... It's possible to do but humans are so greedy I don't think it can happen.
Yeah, I’d like to see someone like Joe Biden trying to learn how to do something useful. Lol yeah right.
Dude why so dumb. I met a lot of people and whenever someone acts stupid is stupid and everything he does is stupid. He even deeply believes in himself that he is stupid. Then i know that this guy was just told that he is stupid as a young kid and said that he is stupid until he himself believed that... and now he really is stupid because whenever some stuff in his life was needing intelligence to solve he thinks. Ah shit Hmm i almost forgot im stupid... hmm yea lets give up. I never met a person in my life that is actually stupid. But i often meet people that deeply believe that they are stupid so then they are stupid. And most people are supporting this behaviour by saying oh nono let him he is not that smart... well no he isnt because you give him this "identity" of the stupid guy. I always think of it like that: the brain of a doctor or any other smart guy is the same of an homeless. same as the arm of a bodybuilder is the same as the arm of a homeless. XD nothing against homeless. But its a muscle go train it and stop believing that your brain isnt mentally capable of being intelligent... you only think it is. Oh lol i wrote a lot sry. But that stuff makes me angry because I got told I am stupid sooo often and i understood that concept and now i go to evening school and have insanely good marks without even studying anything. And only because I stopped believing im stupid. Im done now thans
🤣🤣
"And if everyone's super... No one will be" -Syndrome
This is more relevent than this dumbass video!
Exactly.
That was not the point of thia video... he didn't say have an education to make money.. he said that if 8 billion people collectively worked on solving our practical problems (energy, food, labor) we would solve them in five years instead of 500. Because as we evolve, we figure out how to automate more and more things making them cheaper and cheaper and at the end basically free, so then we ll be able to work on creative things
@@Dryaspis Humanity would crumble in those 5 years. It takes all types of people to keep the world moving. Its not just about access to education. What happens when we start to run out of food because no one is growing it? Who will keep people from committing crimes or taking advantage of each other? Who will build/repair the houses we live in? If your answer is robots, which unlucky engineers and scientists get demoted back to assembler and mechanic to build and repair said robots?
@@Dryaspis we do have 8 billion people collectively working on solving our practical problems, and the way we do that is by taking those who aren’t smart enough to be scientists, or those that are smart enough but choose not to be scientists do things like farm to provide the food to those solving our practical problem, or builders who build their homes.. since when are we not trying to solve our problems?
“Because everyone can be a scientist or engineer if they have the training”
Clearly he’s never worked around the general public before. This is what happens when you only hang out with other smart people.
I was the same opinion, i always thought people are smart and can learn and do anything, but since the pandemic i worked on a farmers market and this opinion changed greatly 😂
Besides being either smart or dumb, people can have inclinations. I tried getting into IT (I do kinda work in that field just not with code) but I just couldn't do it. It's too boring. I get physically uncomfortable.
I might be dumb, sure, but I don't think that's the core issue here.
Even all smart people can’t code. I’ve gone to multiple top 10 schools and most people who are smart still aren’t capable of coding at a high level.
Yes exactly. The old me would've been the first to defend the idea that everyone is on the same level of intelligence and all that matters is the will and mentality
Turns out some people are just not, um, smart?
@@bananaOyster yes I have the same problem I think highly abstract work boring too. and maybe that has to do with me not having enough brain power to appreciate the beauty of it
I do physics instead of math because its both grounded in reality but modeled by abstract ideas, the perfect balance for me
“Yes everybody can be rich”
Proceeds to talk about something completely irrelevant to wealth gain
What if we don't need to do all the stupid jobs we can produce more stuff. The more stuff you have the richer the society is
@@warbananas6858 not true. Ever heard of Germany’s financial crisis in the 20’s?
your definition of rich is money based, his is not
@@connorrydel752 where does he clarify that?
@@theonlyjoe_ The Great Depression? that was caused from World War I ?
You can IMMEDIATELY tell this guy has never taught a classroom in his life.
Or they're that smart-ass teacher who always thinks they are correct
Fr 😂😂
Or understands basic economic principles. For starters: more money in the economy = more inflation => higher prices & value of money ⬇️; but, no, “everybody can be rich”
I can IMMEDIATELY tell your name is Nate
@@Daniel-ld7xsI can IMMEDIATELY tell your name is Daniel
its not a “thought exercise”, its just a story he tells and I can see hundreds of different endings of this story.
Economics 101.. resources are finite, if everyone could afford to purchase everything there would be nothing left..
@@jatley91 no
@Pineapple Head so where are we digging all the resources to make all these robots? Our current supply chain can’t mine or provide the current resources and we are quickly running out of natural resources required to build the silicon that runs them.. so where are these infinite resources and manpower to mine, build, and manage these robots? Do they not break down and require spare parts? If machines did every little thing we wouldn’t be doing art, we would be repairing machines 😂😂😂😂 plus it’s impossible but sure
@@jatley91 you built a nice straw man and burnt it down. Nice
@@alejandropreciado1814 I’m sorry that logic and reason applied to a “thought exercise” feels like a straw man argument 😂😂 let’s just pretend the world isn’t what it really is? Work better for you bud?
Love how everyone sees the idiocy in this 💯👏🏽
True
Totally bro, lemme guess you got a 2.5 gpa in high school? and dropped out near the end? works at mcdonalds? lmaooo
@@gf1945__ he was being sarcastic bro ig....
@@gf1945__ oh Oliver.....
Love how anyone can pretend the current system isnt just a few steps away from slavery. Working our lives away making slow progress while watching eachother slowly fade away and die. All while our bought and sold government sleeps on the job accepting slow progress for short term profits as the only possible option. We are old enough to know this is just a massive waste of our time. We could have real progress if we all wanted to.
This is the most incredibly shortsighted and broad-strokes painting of human society I have ever seen or heard in my life. My mans washed away millennia of social hierarchies, crime, mental illness, disease, and even the very concept of human ego with “well if everyone studied hard sciences, the world would be perfect.” Rich people truly know nothing about the real world.
Hard science involves psychology and neuroscience right? I imagine if more people were working those fields we would make progress in identifying,treating and preventing psychological illnesses.They might then eliminate those cases alltogether ( probably not 5 years but its such a small subsection of the population that the thinking power lost from them is almost negligable so we would still make similar progress either way).As for the social hierarchy/ego points, yeah human are greedy and egotistical but we're technically capable of displaying selflessness and humility so it remains a hopeful possiblity.In anys case this is just a thought experiment so it shouldnt be taken as a serious plan of action.
@@idontgiveadamn1000 First off psychology is not a hard science, but even if it was your point about a “negligible population” is not predicated on any facts but rather your assumptions. According to analysis published in The Lancet, over a third of the world suffers 5 or more health ailments simultaneously, while another study estimates that a fifth of the US population suffers from mental health disorders (this would actually probably be a low estimate in terms of global application given the US’ living standards). We have no idea how these ailments affect people, so the assumption that it doesn’t matter or that the rest of the world would develop even if they had no input is a stretch and not a logically sound conclusion. But let’s move on to your second point. Lets assume the health and psychological costs are “negligible” (which they are not), your point about humans “technically being capable of displaying selflessness” makes it seem like greed and selflessness are equally balanced choices that humans make. They’re not. Greed is far more common of a trait for humans to employ because ultimately it is a trait that animals are programmed to portray for survival. Without selfishness, animals do not compete to the best of their ability to keep themselves alive in a Darwinian world. Selflessness overcoming selfishness would only be theoretically possible if there was some sort of advantageous factor to selflessness that became a dominant trait, which gets me to my last reply: social hierarchies. You didn’t actually address this properly in your response, but I hope you realize the difficulty of social hierarchies isn’t just it’s social factors, but the fact that it allows money as a concept to exist. If everyone had money, and everyone was in the top 1%, basic capitalist economics says that no ONE is in the 1%. Money essentially becomes worthless at that point; it’s only value comes from manufactured scarcity and government oversight; a world where “everyone is rich” as stated in the video here means that money no longer functions the way it does right now. The solution to our poor living standards and money problems is not “studying hard sciences”. This is the mindset of engineering students with a chip on their shoulder who think they’re better than everyone because indeed.com says they’ll have the biggest salary of all their friends after graduation. The only real way to address these things, to a global audience, is to rethink how the systems themselves work and fix the problems that allow 1% of the world to own 90% of the wealth. But given the grip that governments and the wealthy have on these systems, and the resources they have to continue this gap for their own benefits, it’s unlikely.
@@abhayglal there's too much to read here given that I have ADHD, but from what I did see theres just one thing I have to say. Psychology is objectively a hard science, period. I don't know what argument you have for why you think it's not and I honestly don't think I can focus my kind for long enough to read it, but for once I don't think it matters. Psychology is a hard science based on scientific study and empirical evidence. The people that think it's not don't know what Psychology is. The people that say it's not a hard science are usually basing their information off of the internet tendency to make it into a pseudoscience. "Psychology fact!: if your boyfriend looks at his phone, he's cheating! Don't ask for sources, that's just how it is". People on the internet just make shit up and call it Psychology. That's not what Psychology is. If you try to study Psychology, the first thing youll find is that psychologist disagree with that type of "psychology" and are only interested in empirical and quantitative evidence, just a much so as a chemesist, physicist, etc. True Psychology is a hard scientist, internet Psychology is pseudoscience. It's similar to the difference between astronomy (a hard science) and astrology (a fantasy). You're thinking astrology; think astronomy
Emotions are running high
@@jonathandavis8051 true psychology has almost nothing to it though. It’s a field in its infant stages with little to no understanding and what we do know about it doesn’t apply to everyone or everything meaning it is not a hard science. There are very few true hard things we know about human psychology or how our brains function on a mental level. Chemically sure but that’s more biochemistry not psychology. And biochemistry is a hard science not psychology
“Don’t tell me people can’t do it”
“You’ve not met a lot of people have you”
An amazing education and smart well off parents interested in your education.
Lol thank you, once you get to the workforce you realize there are a lot of people who just can’t.
@@wamsly2334 This, bro. I've been a wildland firefighter and instructor for over 12 years. Some people are just unfathomably incapable, and you can't experience this until you meet them.
Lol, do you even know how the device you're using was made?
I'll give you a hint, they weren't educated.
Repetition doesn't require intelligence, quite the opposite actually
I imagine like 90% of people could do 90% of tasks, only a small percentage who just can't manage.
He’s leaving out the social aspect of the human “ pissing contest” that has inflicted humans for 1000s of years now, will always be the determining factor of wealth and resource distribution.
The utopia he speaks of, would only exist if every human looked the same,
,believed the same things, and had the same values on life. Humans thirst for self preservation will always lead to someone/something suffering
Most of the religious stuff gets weeded out with education.
@@justifano7046 Tell that to a Jewish or Muslim doctor or professor. Education doesn’t weeded out the lust to be top dog or the leader.
Just like it’s impossible to truly domesticate a Lion, I think world peace and a end to global poverty is impossible, it’s in human nature to practice self preservation at all costs, so land, resources and people will always be pillaged.
Yes, and the worse thing is that people just refuse to acknowledge that we are animals, and therefore have impulses that animals have too that are hardwired into our DNA and no matter education certain things can't be changed
@@williebailey91 very well said
@@justifano7046 what a silly thought, as if religion is totally founded by uneducated people.
Love how he flaunts the words "scientist" and "engineer" like they are the only necessary jobs
Whatever is necessary can be done with science technology
They "would be" the only necessary jobs. I think that's his point.
Robots and aliens are the solution for the laziness of humans? Is that what rich means? I thought rich is when you have considerably more money than the average person. In africa, you are rich if you have a restaurant, a car, a house, and some clothes.
@@kelemenraul8859 That's the story, not the reality. Solution to laziness? Why do we think we need that? Because we want to achieve more? Well, then we can get up and do something. That's the solution, of course.
The point is to transfer all the productive work to machines so we can work on what want to. Will that be a good thing entirely? No. Nothing is 100% "good". In fact, most things are an equal balance of yum and yuck.
The point is to move us away from unhealthy things like working a job your whole life which you hate until you retire with lots of money, and no health nor life left to spend it. What a stupid idea, right?
Scientist and engineer as 1st jobs and all the rest as second jobs...then his plan could work. Say, 3 days in the 1st job and 2 days in the second. That way, society will still function.
Man thats like naivety on steroids. If you take that level of simplication to a subject than anything, anything can be rationalized.
IKR? My thoughts exactly.
"Imagine if everyone owned a small rectangle that fit in your pocket with unlimited access to the world's information and the ability to communicate instantly and conduct transactions instantly. We would have so much time for self-improvement and professional development. Everyone can be rich, everyone."
@@creamchunk if only people can properly utilise what they have
@@CJMoore-sh1bs even with a wand this supposed reality afterwards is 100% Alice in the wonderland.
@@purnasaimadala says the guy scrolling through youtube shorts 😁😁
I work in automation, and it's just not as easy as "if everyone was educated". Just ask Elon, the model 3 factory was supposed to be 100% automated, today it's not even close.
That’s because everybody’s not educated
Exactly. That's because there's only ONE ELON. This guy is imagining 7.5 billion Elons. The problem is... even if we were all like Elon we won't be doing much. We'd all be masturbating on spaceships and just traveling around in space.
I mean it’s 2022 and learning to code is literally free! You can be job ready in a year or so - people are doing this. My housemate went from business to date science in 6 months and almost doubled his salary and he isn’t that intelligent but he has a strong work ethic
@@Rhcpmusic297 Maybe he's a closet genius and hasn't came out yet.
@voidwalker Lol it's true though. That's exactly what would happen if we were all like Elon Musk. Space orgies and stuff until we find a planet or something.
Sounds like a scene from movies, and the irony is even the existing engineers and scientists are not the rich people at the moment.
True but good engineers make more wealth for everyone. One man made the printing press. Guy single handily made the transfer of information over time exponentially easier. The thing is it's a mixture of creative and smart people in one. How many elon musks are out there. It would be easier to find those people and put them to work. Average engineers are not what make a company or a society thrive. It's the exceptional ones.
I don’t think he’s talking about rich as in money rich. I believe he means happiness.
True but were well off 😉
correct, scientist and engineers are not rich at the moment. There is no irony
Just from not even a engineer standpoint let’s say a kitchen first you need to automate cooking then you need to automate dish cleaning then you need to automate delivery and cleaning even if you were to do all of these things. There would be break-ins and technicians would need to come in to service equipment most likely every week or month. It’s a great idea in concept but even Amazon’s mostly automated shop I think cost 1$ million $ to setup (in other words it’s highly expensive to even get something partially automated, great idea highly improbably though)
He's talking about gearing society toward developing technology to replace/manage every job and activity that isn't related to STEM. This has nothing to do with monetary wealth and is actually closely related to what would need to occur to make a modern socialist society that allocates resources by need and societal benefit rather than by monetary incentive.
Socialism needs magic to work, I'd say confirmed but it was known before.
What a load of bs
YES
@@failedabortion1894 Bro he's literally describing socialism.
Absolutely. I wish we could live in the world you just described. But the second you say that someone has to say “well that’s just because your lazy and don’t want to work”… no I want to work towards my own personal goals and not to make money just to live in this shit society. I’m so tired of people sitting on their high horse just because they work themselves to death. Humans were not built for this, we created it. So why can’t we create something different? A better society
“robots would be doing everything...we would have wonderful lives” i have no mouth and i must scream
Ok loomer go back to the fucking 16th century mate we get it robot scary bad
@@amistrophy anime pfp....
@@amistrophy Says the one with an anime pfp
@@amistrophy pfff You clearly know nothing about society...
@@amistrophyanime pfp
Everyone being rich is such a possibility that you would first have to find a magic wand to make it a reality 😂
Yeah, I guess it’s just because the US would never pay for everyone’s education.
I was going to like your comment but i seen the number. Use me as a like button instead.👍🏽
Honestly people haven't figured it out yet when somebody has a lot of money it has to come from somewhere else from someone else. It's a hierarchy rich people are at the top the government's near the top homeless people at the bottom right next to the third world countries.
Yes it is possible for a country like America to have a bunch of rich people and no homeless and no crime but that means another country is suffering. This is exactly why the United States right now is considered to be one of the highest world powers is because the vast majority of its manufacturing comes from sweatshops in third world countries. So all you've really done is shifted the hierarchy from your own border to another border
It is possible for everyone to be rich the only problem is there are people in this world that have so much money that it could last 10 generations let’s 10 generations of a family not doing anything
@@SuperJhon360 I believe he is speaking of a post scarcity society where no one has to go without.
“Everybody can be rich. Let me explain”
Proceeds to explain absolutely nothing related to how everybody could be rich
By sharing the wealth of comfort.
This is a short. You're not gonna see his full explanation that takes longer you silly goose
Everyone could be rich by being educated he means
You just big dumb. He is explaining that if we worked towards a more autonomous future that we would be able to enjoy the fruits of our labor. Buying luxury items wouldn’t be so difficult because it would be dirt cheap to make. Money would mostly lose value and your needs would be fulfilled. I’d say he’s a little optimistic and utopic but there’s some truth in this
That's what I was thinking XD Maybe it's because it's just a clip, but in the clip it doesn't explain at all
I can see that he truly believes the bs coming out of his mouth 🤔
@BumbleBee I dont know how you would change that 😑
@@geonatikon9987 that’s the thing: We’re so far gone that we can’t change it
Deadass. If you don’t have the education, knowledge, skill, requirements, financial status, luck and willpower: You simply can’t do it. It’s not just education
The exact thing I commented! : bullshit :)
@@rishei4748 then it boils down to you just being a D grade human, weak and incompetent
He's talking about a post-scarcity world where people can do meaningful work because all the hard shit is handled by machines, think Star Trek. Kinda dig it but we're a long way out.
We really arent. All of the technology and AI already exists. Small groups of rich individuals however do not want the staus quo tochange. Its why we are still trying to get the cold war started up again.
@@vicious12394 for one, AI isn't quite there yet. Not for the mass scale implied in this scenario.
The other problem is resource scarcity. That's the main thing holding us back right now. Material costs are just too high for us to go to almost entirely machine production methods in a timely fashion. It will take a long time for that transfer to happen without massive injection of valuable raw materials.
That will happen in the near future though with asteroid mining. So I personally don't think a post-scarcity society is very far away, at least in the western world.
Oh and the cold never really stopped in reckon, just had a bit of a down period through the late 20th, early 21st century
@@Patrick-zr8tv personally i think resources aren't the problem, resource distribution and waste is the problem. Our society is structured to encourage massive ammounts of hording and to discard resources if it isnt profitable enough to reuse them. Mining the asteroid belt would be a disaster if we did it with the current capitalist ecconomic model we have.
Classism still exists so he's dreaming
@@vicious12394 it's still way further off than you think. Robots are a good example, we don't really have powerful enough robots to work for hours on end without recharging. Once we get robots that only need to be recharged every few days or every week, everything is going to change. Like everything. Every manual labor job is going to disappear, every landscaper, shelf stocker, factory worker, self driving will be a bit different but you get the idea.
"They can they just have to be educated" I don't think this guy's talked to a single real human in his entire life
U spelldt reel rong
@@roogle3878 funny
You are that guy that looks down on other people who thinks other people can't do shit like he mentioned in the video.
@@sagargiri3145 the UD army conducted enough experiments to find out that it would be more harmful for them than beneficial to employ people without an IQ above about 83...the army wants everyone...but can't take them because they are sure that they don't have a job they would do successfully..sad truth
@@henrywolf8618 agreed. You would think this guy would have looked to see if there were studies disagreeing with him were he an engineer or scientist.
This guy's expression literally makes him look like a robot who was programmed yesterday
Rich baby ua-cam.com/users/shortsSZz3MK9p_tE?feature=share
Like that robot in the scooby foo movie controlled by scrappy
Hes trying speed up humanity's progression so skynet can be created quicker.
They make every throwaway quote sound like gem of knowledge. We need social sciences.
No, we really do not. What vital system would civilization lose?
@@snoweefrost4412 being civil
@Hüsamettin Karakeci historical fact would like to disagree. Sociology isn't nearly as old as civilization. It was made in 1838. Political Science in around 1860.
I know enough about social science to say that it's not a societal need; it's a luxury. It shouldn't even be called a science.
Mostly, it is the idle ponderings of wealthy elites about the lives of the common person and how to break them into statistical blocks based on arbitrary criteria. The start of social research is academic, and the end result is academic, a completed loop of superfluous information. Clincial psychology does a far better job.
No political, medical, legal, or scientific body makes true use of social science. The most useful social science degree is in HR.
@@snoweefrost4412 Sociology is as old as human consciousness. It began the first person thought “why do people act in x way?” It’s used to understand predictable behavior, either so it can be replicated, predicted, or changed. Criminology, combat tactics, marketing, governance, education, customer service, international politics, economics, city planning-all these things are key components to the societies we live in and they all stand on the shoulders of sociological thinkers since the dawn of civilization. Anyone who fails to see the value of sociology and thinks that STEM is all you need is ironically someone who has fallen prey to a culture that wants to profit off of you without you ever figuring out how the game really works. And they use sociology to trick you into it.
@Brian Briones Old as human consciousness? We're talking about, or at least I thought we were, reality, not some faux religious creation story.
Sociology is a barely discernable collection of hypotheses and academic ego. That's all.
"Everybody can be rich, let me start my imaginary experiment with a magic wand"
Yeah you missed the point.
@@Swervithan We can't even get half of highschoolers to pass algebra, bra.
@@pytis yeah bra, like there are so many idiots in middle school that are immature and retarded bra
It's called dreaming of a better reality rather than accepting the fact of our inevitable fate that work with slow progress is just a waste of our time. We need to remove the bottleneck and see real change. Our bought and paid government is certainly the bottleneck.
@@billyj3842 Well said. Everyone in this videos comments are all nay sayers. All successful people had nay sayers, and look where they are now.
This video reminds me of a quote from the incredibles
“If everyone’s super, no one will be”
@@zthirtyblue if everyone’s rich then all the prices will just go up drastically and then no one would be rich
@@mrcoolz5541 that’s literally what I was saying with my first comment
Maybe that's not such a bad thing though
And your comment demonstrates genius in the social sciences!
@@KH-ch9wz robots duh
Being rich is more than having money… it’s a state of mind. I’m rich in the things that matter most to me.
if you bank isn’t filled up. no you not rich my friend. your just happy and content with your current situation. but no where is that being rich lmao
@@princeamg loathing for lost causes from experience i see, when you are all ready lost there’s know experience that it derives from aka source…its a double edged sword and you are just an example by the reasoning of how you do it not what you do so it is not what you do it’s how you do it
@@Cri. what?😂😂😂😂
@@zodotaru5347 i had 3 seizures trying to understand that shit
Dr. - so your bill for the life saving surgery after insurance is 70k..
Me-..hmm well I'm rich where it matters most. Here's 80k in state of mind money. Keep the change.
Dr-..
Everyone IS rich in a way or another. You just have to be satisfied with it. Satisfaction is the key to richness.
It's really amazing how seemingly smart people think the world is that simple....
He was seemingly smart to you? I'll concede articulate.
Coz it's bullshit
i mean he literally said "if we could wave a wand" i dont really see how he thinks the world is easy he just gave an example like what if it was that easy. keep up bro
Thought experiments allow us freedom to imagine potential futures. And although I do think he is far removed from reality, his argument that everyone can and should be educated is a very relevant one, in my opinion.
@Sherman Did Nothing Wrong i think that’s why he said a thought experiment
“Don’t tell me people can’t do it. They can”
Um, actually… the people who’ve run the studies don’t agree.
I’m thinking that the few that might be left after this “reset” will be the few rich with just enough of us to fix the robots.
The dumbest shit I've ever heard always comes from smart people.
When you're intelligent you lose perspective. Most people lose IQ points 10 minutes in to introduction to C++
@@gg-gamers you're the slow one. Anyone can learn comp sci with enough training. You just don't wanna put in the work over time. Most just quit when it gets hard. Not because they can't
@@joys8634 the question is how much is enough education? If it takes 20 years to teach someone to be a programmer versus someone who takes 4 to know just as much and be just as effective it isn’t worth it.
As a college tutor, not everyone has the mindset or way of thinking that is required for engineers.
Or do you think just imagine if our public school system started teaching the basics of coding and engineering in middle school
What if as a govermemt you urged the public to assist their country in explaining to their kids that they should work as an engineer or scientists so that the work will be a better place.
Not only that but a not insignificant portion of the population is literally not smart enough to do this. It's an unfortunate reality.
@@rekrn12345 Not necessarily, there’s a wide array of intelligence factors. They don’t have to be academically gifted necessarily. Engineer is very broad, but having been given the education and motivation I think the majority of the population could fill a role in technological advancement. But if you mean like they’re stupid in the sense that you don’t like their decisions or opinions, I don’t know how to change that.
Maybe you are one of those incompetent college tutor
Guy: everybody can be rich
Also Guy: let's wave a magic wand for education
He starts his premise with “if everyone was educated as a scientist and engineer” flawed theory from the get go
why do you think so?
Well it's not an unbelievable premise. It's quite a possible one
@@keifer7813 do you live in the same world as me? People are so ignorant nowadays millions of people believe the world is flat….🤦♂️😂
@@keifer7813 No police force? No teachers, doctors? Farmers? Designers? Economists?
@@fredriksvard2603 I think his point was that after we all use our collective efforts to automate as much shit as we can, we then focus on the shit you that can't be automated e.g designers.
I conducted the thought exercise. My conclusion was society collapsed.
Yep. He's looking at one side of the picture
Can you explain your thought process?
@@MadManMitch The new scientist/engineer society will take several years to provide the full automation described, if that is even possible (I actually suspect complete automation in the way described is not possible). In that time who will provide the absolutely necessary services? Society would collapse before it realizes its utopian advancement.
He should read an economics textbook. Even if everyone was an engineer, most would still be put in low wage jobs as the degree loses its value and the low wage jobs are still necessary.
Exactly. It's like a basketball game that's tied in the 3rd quarter, it's pretty much 0-0.
His point is if we had more engineers and scientists and programmers we could accelerate the robot revolution and have all occupations automated within years, after which people can transition to art and social sciences.
@@drew4711 thank you for saying it for me, at least someone gets it
You got it wrong bro. He is talking about complete automation. All work would be done by machines and human beings would only have to maintain the machines. Just that everyone will have to be trained to maintain these machines. Just like a farmer maintains food crops while food crops produce food on its own.
He graduated from an ivy league college in economics and cs degree.
Spoken like a person that has had his head in books, academia, and learning more than he has been a student of humankind.
This guy probably trying to push a political agenda
@@xshxr yes, life is about people not the pursuit of wealth. People don’t need more money they need fulfillment.
@@xshxr I wouldn't say they need other people for fulfillment, but it is clear that the quality of our relationships are directly correlated to our happiness. And when academia and amassed wisdom take on the central core of our identities, It is all to easy to either have our ego destroyed, or to allow our pride to hinder our growth as a species, being students of humankind has had no detrimental effects on humanity IMHO, however I would argue that it is the pursuit of knowledge and understanding above the pursuit of people that has caused divides between societal classes, cultures and nations for that matter.
“Everyone can be rich.” What does he think happens to the value of wealth when everyone is rich?
@Soosh Not even remotely true. Beyond idiotic and simplified thinking.
@Soosh it's not a matter of if the won't or not, it's literally impossible, if everyone was rich, everyone would be poor
Value disappears bro
@@Distriks Thank u
Wealth does not equal currency. I'm not saying this guy is correct but the idea that everyone can be rich is one hundred percent true. Every year we get closer and closer to that goal. Globally, the rich get richer every year AND the poor get richer every year. Global poverty has never been lower than it is today. Everyone is getting wealthier and nothing has happened to the "value of wealth"
Here’s the problem with that. If everyone were millionaires than prices would skyrocket and nobody would be rich
He’s not saying actually rich he’s saying we would be so advanced everybody would live a rich lifestyle
@@shush6711 yeah let’s all get educated to advance society so that way the rich could devalue our education and have robots do everything while most of the country remained homeless cause that’s capitalism
The sigma song is eventually going to be so slowed down, that I can hear the ladies running away from op
He's done good for himself ever since the chocolate factory came under new management.
This is the one comment that really made me laugh instead of just a snicker or smile. Thank you!
@@realizedreams6183 James is saying that this guy is crazy and looney, just like Willie Wonka
@@realizedreams6183 You too!!!!
This techno utopian mindset has a lot of pitfalls. I’m not completely convinced with the argument that everyone can be trained or inclined to be educated in it either. It’s more than education because even that of itself has a lot of issues at the institutional level
U are actually ignorant
Ignoring this creative idea that could make the world a better place because you don’t believe everyone could be educated. It sounds like u are the problem
@@Conqueefstador the problem is many would prefer to be uneducated and live on . It will mock the mindset of those who are working hard in their education
It's a thought experiment.
True. He underestimates the IQ. That’s pretty naive actually. Take away the jobs of people with lower IQ and watch them burn down your robots.
It's not that everyone needs to be rich. It's fulfillment, this is the goal.
100% agree
social status s quite important, u can be miserable, but if u're the best of ur group, u're pretty much the king and u feel like one,
but if u live in a wealthy society with hot water on demand , food on demand, worm shelter, pretty much luxury, still doesn't cut it when the people u're looking at seem to have a little more. that's nature 's doing.
@@roberttrisca8210 what social status - do people have groups of friends? :v
Take what he’s saying with a grain of salt and figuratively. His message is not wrong though. If everyone truly strives for greatness, society would advanced stupidly fast. I also agree any homeless person off the street can be writing code with some basic education and give value to society. It highly impractical but just food for thought
I mean u right but this comes at a huge cost
If everyone get good jobs then they wont be good Jobs anymore it will become the ”normal” job and wont pay as good as it pays today . The thing is it pays so good right now because not everyone can do it and Ye as this guy say ”anyone” can do it or whatever but it just doesnt work like that inflation and demand comes in
@@danielbengtsson9597 exactly not to mention tge mental stress that comes from this
The problem is that you can’t just have people with education who will be providing food and other needs while people are gaining an education
I feel like saying basic education is dumbing down the process of learning how to code. Learning any kind of basic code seems pretty useless to me. Wouldn’t coding something that’s useful to someone require more than just a basic understand of coding?
"Education without values,as useful as it is,seems rather to make man a more clever devil.C.S Lewis."
Those that are exceptional at any profession are intensely intuitively drawn towards said profession. Yes, anyone with a brain can “learn” how to do anything, but without a true, deep interest, it’s very difficult to put in the hours that are required to develop exceptional ability. In order to serve others do what you’re intuitively interested in.
Yep, I’ve heard the term “you can’t make a rocket scientist out of a trucker, and you can’t make a trucker out of a rocket scientist” many times when I was young, there’s a reason people chose to be the “prestigious” jobs like lawyer or professor and even the gritty jobs like morticians or waste management. Every job is essential to the overall success of a society and different people chose to do those jobs
@@eli6797 Plus net more money than the doctor for the first 15 years lol
How is this a thought exercise when he is giving answers so quickly?
IT aint He wants to reassure himself
If you have played any strategy management games with limited resources, you know once the machines get unlocked and built. The people start “mysteriously” dying until there are only the necessary people left.
Listen to it in slow motion if you have to
It's magic.
Think about it , there's a lot more behind this viee
I love how I watched this twice and thought this was interesting. Maybe even truthful. Then I clicked the comment section and started dying of laugher because everyone is absolutely shredding this video.😂
Dude same 😂 and I see everybody's point I swear, but I'd be lying if I said I didn't see this man's point as well 🤣
@@3Pegwinn3 I paused it as soon as he said, “everyone can be rich”…. Like- that can’t happen.
Idk if they’re shredding it so much as they’re small minded people who can’t fathom a world that isn’t as broken as our’s
It reminds me of the time my college professor like Chicano history professor with a PhD from Berkeley and two masters from UCLA told me when I was feeling down because I couldn't understand something I was just like I'm not smart like you he looked at me he said I'm not smart I'm trained and a month later he looked at me with pride in his eyes and said it now you understand and you're a scholar from this day forward
thank you Ronald W Lopez head director of the Chicano studies at Sonoma State Viva La Raza all the children the inner city ghetto we're giving a private school education and tell somebody young age that they were going to go to an ivy league university imagine how many Geniuses we would have how many diseases we would have been cured imagine how many people died in fell into the violence of the inner city there are no dead in prison for life or lost to drug addiction imagine how many people how many children weren't allowed to reach their potential because as a flood of crack cocaine in inner-city ghettos Across America during the late 70s early 80s amazing how many people genius is one allowed to flourish because of the people control the 1%
Man I hate these kind of over simplified "speeches" and everyone is like wooow 🙌🙌🙌
Me too. They’re inherently illogical and appeal to the pseudo-intellectual, superficial douchebags obsessed with “the grind” who believe anything dumb like this is in any way profound.
Anyone who points out their fragile reality as sheep is just a “hater” or “unsuccessful in their life”, it’s hilarious.
@@M.S.G.95 Man. What you said “anyone who points out their fragile reality is serve as sheep or haters.” The realist shit I ever seen. Perfectly sums up all the 1% that tell normal people to “get on the grind” and “hard work” “HUSTLE HUSTLE HUSTLE.”
“In this world wherever there is light, there are also shadows..” as nice as this sounds we still cannot live in actual peace because of the wrong hands and twisted people.
So many of these comments on UA-cam these days. The pandemic has really done a number on people. But I guess we may as well comment on the internet, stand down and stay scared right?
Live the rest of your life awaiting an “inevitable” bad ending or crooked villain in the story, and you’ll never appreciate the real GOOD that we could all achieve. So many people are so quick to shut down and point out problems in the “best case scenario” subconsciously having a bias and leading to more skepticism than actual progress. I believe everyone has a right to their own opinion, but not everyone’s opinion has the right to be respected. Some people won’t understand that but it is what it is. Stay curious :)
what are you even saying? What is getting a man? There are homophobes, there are racists, there are nationalists, religious extremists that'd slit my throat for my beliefs. There's no "crooked ending" to everything, but there's plenty of crooked shit. Everyone can have their own beliefs, and no we won't respect them, sure but let's not pretend like that solves anything.
For this kind of placement, he definitely must have missed, in fact, some social science classes.
When you thought you were a genius but actually you understood nothing at all
Bruhhh the fact that this dude's being serious is mind blowing, i know this dude would starta billion person cult just to make his dream comes true you can even see it in his eyes
His eyes are really strange
This is a misleading clip out of his podcast , read more of tweets on Twitter . He is very famous ( Naval ) and his thoughts are absolute mind boggling good advice
You made a super complex assumption based on a 30 second clip from a 3 hour podcast of a whole person
He started with "Everyone can be rich"
End with "Everyone is gonna be unemployed" 😂😂😂
Pretending like everyone could do creative work, or even want to lol
This kind of thinking is not ment for everybody unfortunately.
@@sirreginaldfishingtonxvii6149 yup the guy is an idiot..
Which robot's job do you want to do? Do you want to clean streets, drive people around, work in a steel mill? You won't have to; you could instead spend your time applying yourself to intellectual discovery. In such a society wherein the goal is to explore the subjects of scientific fields, we should have no use for money. Employment is replaced by occupation (the principle business of one's life).
@@Ubersnipe I don't think everyone would want to, nor really even be able to perform any significant degree.
Not all truckers hate being truckers, not all taxi drivers hate being taxi drivers, and not all factory workers hate that either. Some simply genuinely enjoy such work. Assuming that everyone does so because they "have" to shows a bias towards the kind of work you enjoy yourself.
There are many kinds of people who are good at and enjoy many different things. If everyone was forced to do the same thing, I doubt that would be a real improvement. At least in my mind.
He is so confident in himself, he actually believes what he is saying to be true. But all he’s doing is lie to himself and everyone else
What's wrong about it?
@@markdallen4018 what happens to uneducated people? (not because they won't learn but they are struggling to learn),no job opportunities for the uneducated,massive suicide cases(failing school means failing in life ) he make it sounds positive but neglect the consequences
@@markdallen4018 robots have yet to make our work easier it's just made billionaires richer.
@@ClemintineCake yeah sure lol, have you ever been to a factory? You think we would be living the life we’re living without robots in all the mega factories? Without automated robots you wouldn’t have a car and wouldn’t be able to order shit online. Lots of things you wouldn’t be able to do
@Mark Dallen lets say there are 15.000 differens jobs in the world that'll all need to be automated, some are easy and some are extremely difficult to automate. with 7.7 billion engineers and scientists and 15.000 jobs to be automated, they could be split in teams on 500.000 people. coordination is a major issue right off the bat. all these people cant be working on the exact same thing or there will be issues. but Assuming they are able to pull it off, now we have the bigger issue.
Where are we going to produce all of these things, we'd need millions of factories to manufacture all of these things. you might think; robots. but it's the same issue, we need to manufacture all the robots in order for them to work and before that, they need be designed. in short there is absolutly no way we'd be able to acomplish all of this in 5 years, not even in 50 years. and these are only a few of the issues
all the people hung up on the magic wand part completely missed his point 🤣🤣
Indeed. It's pretty sad
“Yes, everybody can be rich” here’s my theory. Now, imagine tomorrow we wave a magic wand 🪄 🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
He says that cause thats the only way some people actually most will take action.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
As always, you've missed the point. It's a *thought experiment* you dumbass. The conjecture goes, if we had a magic wand to educate everyone, we would all be rich. Since we don't have that magic wand, we'll have to do it manually. It'll take longer but it's what we should aim to do, you see?
You missed the simple point.
r/whoosh
I disagree, simply on a supply and demand level. The magic wand would have to be for the robots to show up. Because there are only so many hard science jobs available at this point. So you flood the market and those jobs are not wealth producing.
Let's not even mention thay for every robot you would need technicians/trades people.
And we aren't getting fully automated restaurants anytime soon.
Annnnnd then we are still in a class system and you come back to where we are right now. Educated people serving food to.pay off students debts.
I think this stand point is completely ignorant of basic supply and demand principles. Not to mention the basic need for social sciences. Oh and educators. You'll still need those because people keep being born and getting sick. So now you need doctors......
The water shed on this is rediculous
@Mariam Toma No kidding, and people are still generating trash, eating food and shitting into sewer systems. You need people to do jobs. The first red flag was everyone can be rich off of a tech degree, the second and most glaring was his wholesale dismissal on the family of science that tells *us* how *we* function.
You guys do not understand his point at all. He doesn't mean rich in terms of money, what he's saying if all of humanity put its focus into these sciences all humans can live a better life. And to be fair it's only a thought excersise, it is interesting to think what humans would be capable of with the man power of 8 billion people fully educated and a good ability to cooperate.
@Mariam Toma well you can make the education "free" at least
@@callusklaus2413 if every ones rich no one is right
@@kdote398 I see what you're saying. But I think the thought experiment doesn't really take in to account peoples passions. Education isn't for everyone. Some people have a passion for fixing trucks, some people have a passion for fishing. Educating people isn't going to change people's hearts and what they are passionate about.
Utopian dreams like this end badly when forced on a populous.
Yeah this seems all too "in a perfect world." He's forgetting about greed of the people on top and other longterm effects
It ends badly because of greedy people
Such ideas solve overpopulation problem pretty quickly
@@Marinho965 if you research communism for years like I did, it isnt because of corrupt people. It is simple economics.
@@Belarus2012 lmao
Everybody will become a Doctor.
"Then who the hell is gonna be the patient?"
Nobody...that's the thing dude...nobody would be doing stuff for money anymore. When people have abundance of something, why would they work for it anymore? Ever heard of someone working really hard to get fresh air??
U know doctors get sick too
"We will be done working in 5 years."
*Atomic attack drones* Allow us to introduce ourselves.
For every "creative" person in a university you need thousands of average people just making sure food shelter and powers available, this man doesnt appreciate nor recognise the unseen hard work of others.
I think his point is that if we did whats he is saying, those things would be dealt with by the advances we could achieve
@@VoxDeserta Were going to have fully automated flights to get avocados to London? Have robots do the scheduled maintenence on the robo planes? invent robots that fix those robots too? He's thinking we're just a 100% population of uni grads away from the jetsons and he's wrong.
He is talking about hard sciences like microbiology and nuclear physics not even social sciences. These aren't the "creative" majors unis push out with little to no actual worth and weight in knowledge.
@@masteroogway6660 it is a shame that your expectations are so low. What you've just said isn't even too far fetched for our sad fucking world right now much less the magic wand world of trained engineers and scientists
Engineers and scientists make that hard work much much easier. Thousands of farmers used to be needed to work a plot of land. Now you give 1 or two people agricultural machines and a fucking tractor and they're 300% more efficient. Why? Mechanical engineers, botanists, and agricultural scientists did the hard thinking to that hard work is no longer such a fucking WASTE OF HUMAN TIME AND RESOURCES
“Everybody can be rich.” But theoretically that’s an absolute impossibility in a capitalist economy. If everyone had the same credentials then almost everybody except the best of the best would be unemployed.
No no shhh Capitalism is based off of merit i swear
I dont think he means money, he's talking about being créative and having wonderful life, thats the wealth you want, not money
In the theoretical future he’s talking about people would not be employing capitalism
@@sneakyonthebeat with no way to ensure the means of production are in the hands of the many instead of the few capitalism or worse will be upheld. There is no reason to believe when automation comes that us commonfolk will benefit beyond being able to buy the next version microwaves and fridges and shit.
People don't realize we're using cars, motorcycle, plane, and many other tools which is technology.
And in the past it would be impossible and difficult for people to understand it.
So it's true.
It's funny how people don't realize it
As a mechanical engineering student, I strongly disagree. Ever since primary school, I could see my self have a way easier way understanding physics and mathematics than a lot of my classmates and by the years the gap just grew. Don't get me wrong, I put in a lot of work but I don't think this is for anybody or that anybody could do it if they studied. No they can't. Same way u don't go to the NBA if ur 5'5 with bad genetics.
Too bad Muggsy is 5’3 and played in the NBA. Get off your high horse.
@@kahrs4465 too bad he is the only player ever, which make's him an exception. Also I assure you genetically he's one in a billion, and that is proven by the fact that he could dunk with ease and even won a dunk contest even though he was so short. Do your research brother.
@@kahrs4465 and the fact that you generalize based Solely on an isolated example only proves that u need to get of your ignorance horse.
@@alexandroskoliousis975 You just said that genetics was a obstacle to play in the NBA. (height) then you “assure me” that’s “he’s gifted and one in a billion”
My point is, if you’re a healthy human being you can do and be what the fuck you want.
@@kahrs4465 well genetics do not only play a role in height but athleticism too. Bottom line is u can be everything u want indeed, but let's not fool ourselves and understand that it's not the same for everybody.
Rich people want to believe so hard that their success wasnt mostly luck and background
It wasn't. It was sheer hard work.
@@Ashahar-cc4vb *Small inheritance of several million dollars and other nepotistic things they willfully omit. Ftfy.
@@ProjectBlackweather Big businesses fall when they're in the wrong hands. Small businesses scale when they're in the right hands
Sure some people inherit riches, but if they dont use their head, that inheritance doesn't stick for long.
@@Ashahar-cc4vb Trump went bankrupt twice. He is still filthy rich.
@@nenadmilovanovic5271 I don't think you understand bankruptcy. Companies go bankrupt, not people.
It’s more of a question about passion, not everyone wants to be an engineer however i would love to do it
Mr.Strange: I saw 14.1million possibilities and there's only one possibility that everyones rich
This dude: Elder wand
The man's hard stare would make his eyes pop out
Yeah
Everyone can be rich as long as they disregard what they would like to do for their lives and they're educated in a few specific fields, a luxury many people can't afford.
Disregarding all those glaring caveats, everyone can be rich
Well no, it just requires redistribution of wealth and resources. Its not impossible to do, its just that if you tried that people would be screaming about muh freedoms and communism, whilst doing 9 -9 living in their 1 bedroom 2k a month hovel.
@@vicious12394 can you point to any society that has ever worked in before?
@@joshbecker9051 lol so we should all just live in the bushes by ourselves?
And also completely ignore the fields that are completely needed to have a functioning society that aren't paid well. Dude is living in a dream world
@@vicious12394 i like that idea
I’ve met a good amount of people in my life that I’m 100% confident could NEVER learn a difficult skill, no matter how long they studied or practiced. Some people are not as mentally capable as others, there really are people that are just stupid. No disabilities or anything, just plain dumb and it’s not their fault, it’s just genetics.
Yeah, no. Your 100% confidence doesn't prove anything.
@@nonenone2669 , then you have never been in a position of management. Because they’re everywhere 😂
@@qasw287 or maybe the people teaching are not good at teaching, or these people need to be taught in different ways.
Ill tell you that i thought i was a dumb mofo due to my horrible grades in school.
I almost didn't try college because I didn't think i was capable of it due to my history of horrible grades.
Going into college, I approached learning in a different way than i previously did. When i attended classes, i would leave the class not really knowing wtf the teacher was saying. This was the same cycle being repeated in the past.
So, i started to read the text books, looked online for different and more clear explanations of the topics, went to one-on-one tutoring.
Instead if just relying on the teacher's lectures, i found another way to understand what i needed to learn. Had i not done this, i would not have passed all my classes with A's.
So, im not buying your beliefs.
@@qasw287 Wow a bad manager no suprises there
@@nonenone2669 so what you’re saying is, due to your anecdotal evidence with a problem that many people have (feeling like a dumb mofo due to bad grades) that this situation can be generalized to all of society? It seems like your logic is the exact same as the people you try to refute. Assuming everyone has a similar capability or experience as you doesn’t really achieve or prove anything.
It’s also a matter of interests. If you made everyone’s dream job a STEM job then how much interest would they actually have in creative pursuits outside of STEM
@@sebibence02 Not always. Its a super flawed generalisation.
@@abhiroopdeyrocks everyone in high end STEM jobs are creative. You don't make revolutionary advances or solve difficult problems through memorisation and learning by rote.
@@markdallen4018 what I’m getting at is that if you only have scientists the only commodity available will be science. We might get by cause STEM is a pretty broad umbrella but it might also be the case that we end up with all miller’s and no wheat. You also have the problem of there being a limit on how many scientists and engineers you actually need to solve all of the worlds problems, cause I guarantee that that number is less than how many people there are.
@@sebibence02 that is absolutely correct. That’s what the last bit of my statement makes reference to in that the only creative pursuits of any value in this hypothetical world are science related ones
My man forgot that humans are greedy creatures. No matter how much we try there will always be a person that will want to have everything under his/her control and probably end up with destruction of the society of that time. I belive in the concept of "hard times make tough people. Tough people make easy times. Easy times make weak people. Weak people make tough times, and that's a circle that will go on forever..". And even if "tough people" try to turn "weak people" into "tough people" , the "weak" people won't truly understand and belive the reason why they have to be strong, since they live in an "easy time" and don't know what "tough times" are truly like. Of course, there are always exceptions of "tough people" at the "eazy times" , but they are not enough to Keep the "easy times" from changing to "tough times" After a few generations, the circles always continues.
It’s men not people. Dare to say it u pussy
@@Noname2004kurdish uhhhh... Quite the opposite dude . I wanted to, but I didn't want a guy to call me sexist or something (for example ; wOmen aLsO DeStrOyeD oUr wOrlD as MuCh As We mEn diD!!! 😠) . Plus ! Just because men are the cruelest in the history's past doesn't mean that they will keep being the cruelest ones in the future . Now with gender equality rising, women can also destroy humanity.......for some reason, i feel bad about explaining it. I feel like I support the destruction of our current world (which I don't) 😅
People will do that if they are workaholics or competitive or if they wanted to date someone respectable. its kinda messed up to assume its out of greed...
@@user-ps7we2ww6f queen Elizabeth I and Marry tudor have entered the chat
"Yes everybody can be rich!" But if you see a fish that can fly, you can give it to your dog to get some groceries on his way back home from work*
After you take your last breath are you going to heaven or hell? Please ask yourself that question now.
Jesus can save your soul from hell. He will forgive your sins. He said whoever calls upon his name shall be saved. Call upon Jesus today. Repent and believe the gospel.
@@brotherdj777 Amen, well that's a reminder for sure!
😂😂😂
Yeah that could happen, one problem:
Some of us are very dificult to be educated.
Depends if this “creative jobs” would be paying you with money to buy your food and bills, else we would be in misery and not living in a wonderful society at all, and that is what scares me. The time to invest your money is now. I work in an IT company and I clearly can see how robots and automatic processes can substitute us, even in creativity level, as there are AIs able to generate millions and millions of random ideas and an “control AI” (which is based on what we think is good) says if that is close to what we would like or not...
How you like working at the company if you don’t mind me asking
@@Phatal001 it’s awesome, the amount of diversity in both knowledge and experiences from one and another we have in it is one of the things that amazes me, it’s like an university were you spend most of the time making projects and get paid for it. I also have the opportunity to speak with different clients (which are usually stores), answering their questions and fixing communication problems of our technologies on their end. But many of our tasks there can be automated and we are aiming for that, where in a press of a button or two (changing like 2 params or so), we are able to execute the whole task that would take the entire day for doing it.
@@Phatal001 I work as a data engineer btw! I forgot to mention that for context! Sorry!
No amount of investing improves conditions for the working class, just yourself.
@@kaisolomon5187 that is the point, so in a future where the majority of the working class gets substituted by robots (like Amazon is doing right now) we will still have an income. Or else we need to hope for a new economical system that food is gonna be given for free or, like Elon Musk said, that the government gives “free money” for its population.
I have a question for him: "What hard science you know?"
He can imagine if you want to, just saying
@@durganaveen4152 he can leave your friends behind
@@tivi5 ‘cause your friends don’t dance
I'm sure this makes more sense when you listen to the whole conversation, but he literally says "we can all be rich" and "robots will replace our entire labor force" within 30 seconds.
Not everyone can be rich it's simple. When everyone is rich, nobody is rich because all have the same amount of money. So all people are equal. But every human can have a dignified and happy Life. Being rich =/= good life.
If everyone was trained as a scientist or engineer, we would all starve to death and nothing would be done.
Never trust a simplistic answer to a complex problem
I think it’s actually the other way around.
@@tobiasdontmatter1868 lmfao
Ah yes saturate even more the area of arts, sounds like making a living will be even easier
He just shattered your definition of the phrase "making a living" time to scoop Up Or ReForm your interpreted meaning bruv... you missed the 1 variable that is 🗝Creative living... basic living in our future scenario is already made, "we will have jobs researching & entertaining each other" the Only ones at threat of Making a living harder are the ones who are not actual living... your comment speaks in defense of mindless bots... why sat urn ate it like that? 👍
@@ras_krystafari3333 dont forget to take your meds bro
@@ras_krystafari3333 No
Even Musk said this. There will be a time in the near future where there are more people than jobs available due to technology. It’s inevitable. And either you open up outlets in research and the arts, or you start offing people… possibly through a global emergency of sorts 🤷🏻♂️
@@heartlesshalf-breed514 it's not inevitable, hopefully there's a crash in the system that makes us reset back in technology
I’m still searching the relation with being rich.
"You must have a plan. If you do not have a plan, you will become part of someone else's plan." -The Mushroom
Catch 22: if everyone was a Scientist/Engineer we wouldn't need to be and we could all be artists.
I think hes trying to say if we pushed science and engineering so much in 5 years because everyone is doing it, it would advance so much. Meaning we would have all these high tech machines to do the jobs he said. However just like cheap labour in Asia has destroyed production in the west. Unless the money saved by these computors/robots isnt investing back into people and education. It would be even worse than now in terms of jobs poverty etc.
@@Mazuto808 thankfully there already has been a large push in stem for a little while
@@Mazuto808 thank you. It's work hard now, play hard later. It isn't possible for everyone to become an engineer/scientist though, some kids simply don't have the aptitude. But if we had a lot more this would become a reality much quicker.
@@joseph5900 those people are already great at things like maths. No, not anyone can get a CS degree. I've got first hand experience teaching, some people aren't built for stem like others are. Maybe if a certain work ethic was built into them from a young age, but some kids genuinely have a natural aptitude for certain sciences. I've personally taught kids first hand, there's 100% a natural part of the intelligence we possess.
Then again, he did say have some technical knowledge, not be insanely good at it. Which is think is doable for most people. Then if they could handle the simpler jobs it would still speed the process along.
Who would cultivate, harvest, plant your produce? Please don't tell me robots! There are jobs that require human input or else society cannot function. This guy lives in a dream world!
When all is said and done with technology, musicians will be of the last few occupations humans are necessary for.
I won't live that long, but damn I envy the ones that take that spot
A.I.