Geometry Optimization in Computational Chemistry

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 18 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 18

  • @thelocalsage
    @thelocalsage 4 роки тому

    great video! took a computational chemistry course a year ago and we weren’t able to get to a lot of the stuff with Hessians or transition states, so this was extra interesting!!

  • @Dr.AmjadAli-393
    @Dr.AmjadAli-393 4 роки тому +1

    Fantastic lecture Sir....

  • @JeffMTX
    @JeffMTX 7 місяців тому

    This is akin to the high dimensional optimization done every 5 minutes to determine real time dispatch of generators on the grid. N ~ 6000-15000. I’m new to this- it’s very cool. Are the governing eqns close to linear?

  • @quantphobia2944
    @quantphobia2944 4 роки тому

    Thank you Dr. Sherrill, this helps a lot in firming my understanding towards basics of geometry optimization. I was wondering what table you were talking about to get an approximate hessian?? Could you please provide some references where I can find these tables? Also, how quasi Newton-Rapshon method differs from Newton-Rapshon method?

  • @anujray3769
    @anujray3769 3 роки тому

    This is Great 👍 Sir can you recommend some primer text books to learn computational chemistry

  • @alexhernandezherrera5198
    @alexhernandezherrera5198 4 роки тому

    great video, thanks a lot Dr

  • @nijatshukurov9022
    @nijatshukurov9022 4 роки тому

    Can we get more videos, they are so helpful.

  • @RKumawatFilms
    @RKumawatFilms 3 роки тому

    Nicely explained.

  • @blackmagicasmr1556
    @blackmagicasmr1556 4 роки тому

    Oh... The Enterprises in the background :)

  • @abdahmad7816
    @abdahmad7816 4 роки тому

    Great video!
    I am working on optimization an enzyme using ONIOM(QM:MM) by utilizing gaussian software. I have tried many options to optimize it, however, the protein did not converge!
    Please, could you provide helpful keywords to get optimization done.
    Thank you much!

    • @DavidSherrill1
      @DavidSherrill1  4 роки тому +1

      I haven't done any QM:MM computations myself, so I'm not familiar with the keywords, unfortunately. Proteins are tricky because if you chop out too much of the protein to form a small chemical model for QM, the model might fly apart if you optimize it! QM:MM sounds like a good idea. You might be able to apply some constraints to some of the atoms in the MM region. If you have a crystal structure, you might not really need to optimize it, unless you've tweaked the structure or something.

  • @swagotomsarkar2994
    @swagotomsarkar2994 4 роки тому

    Good Job, Professor. Could you please make a video how to optimise geometry by using computational software, please?

    • @DavidSherrill1
      @DavidSherrill1  4 роки тому

      Hm, specific software gets tricky, because there are so many programs out there! But I did give the example of the Psi4 software, at least, which is free and open-source: www.psicode.org

  • @JeffMTX
    @JeffMTX 7 місяців тому

    SVD baby!

  • @ahmedhegazy8236
    @ahmedhegazy8236 4 роки тому

    Could you please sir make avideo about understanding dihedral angle

    • @DavidSherrill1
      @DavidSherrill1  4 роки тому

      Maybe? If I get time after I tackle some bigger topics, I'll think about it

  • @alexanderm2220
    @alexanderm2220 3 роки тому

    Star trek ftw