4:00 Formal education 7:00 The Stoic 11:00 Real life = Suffering/sacrifices 12:00 *Formal education will make you a living. Self education will make you a fortune.*
Formal education can be very valuable , 1st it forces you to accomplish learning in a limited time frame, 2nd it exposes you to multiple sources of knowledge and accelerates your growth , it makes you have experiences you will probably not know exist or have the stamina or fortitude to complete. One of course should keep growing, education should not be the end but only the start of life long learning.
That nasseib Talib quote at the end hit home hard. I plan my day his something goes side ways i get angry. Navals quote was as always inspiring even tho i have heard it multiple times
Great video. Excellent summary. I wasn’t familiar with the term “anti-fragile” until I watched this video, but I like it and will use it going forward. Thank you!
The catch in your idea is that to really get the value from the books YOU, the individual, has to do the exercise that Picking Nuggets is offering. The value of the offer is mostly an illusion. The value of wisdom cannot be consumed only earned. That’s why there’s nobility in being in the entertainment business. 100% of the value is obtained through passive consumption
As I was studying stoicism in school it seemed like a dumb fairytale, so something was clearly not adding up. Fortunately at the time I was already starting to detox myself from the bad mindset of today as I had just started my first entrepreneural experience as I turned 18. So I started talking about philosophy to fellows I met at events or online and quickly realised they were always talking about stoicism and many almost "worshipped" it, then my own research about it started, and this was the moment I understood that all there was to school was what legal piece of paper it would have left me and skills (almost exclusively soft ones) it had taught me (on this part it was really good though). Hence I realised I better started fresh with everything I had learnt, since how people perceived it is nonsense (especially history, philisophy and authors of the past, as well as the sense and meaning of literature to which unfortunately many teachers and writers are oblivious to)
Seneca/Tim Ferris talking about living a couple of days a month on the cheap only lands with 1st world, imagine giving this advise to a single mother in a village in a 3d world who has to feed 3 kids. Or someone fleeing the war with only a shirt on their back. But yes, for first world problems all of this is useful.
Question on Seneca: can someone explain, from a psychological point of view: given the wealth and power Seneca had, would it have been possible for him to truly face abject poverty or tough circumstances to keep him grounded? He had a conscious safety rope and I wonder if a person is truly in abject poverty, would stoicism even apply.
Imagine the ignorance and damage done if all teenagers decided that high school teachers were "second rate" and they could do better enrolling in the "university of life". This man might be clever, but he is dangerously arrogant, devoid of humility and self-satisfied.
Actually I think the Saudis are doing a good job in utilizing their resources. On the contrary, Lebanon has all the stressors and yet, these stressors didn’t force them to grow.
Wow he should make a book called "What Doesn't Kill You Makes You Stronger", you know, lazily swiping a common cliche for a book title, just like he did with "Skin in the Game"
You’re contradicting yourself. You’re equating trauma with a limited stressor. Of course psychologists do not talk about post traumatic growth as defined by you since a limited stressor, in the context of optimal growth, it is not trauma. A limited stressor in this context occurs within the optimal window of challenge and development. In this context, trauma is by definition NOT a limited stressor. It’s a stressor that overwhelms the internal human system which stays locked in it to a degree that makes it very difficult to unlock. So, no, I’m the context of optimal growth trauma is not a limited stressor.
It is interesting to hear philosophizing about the way one NORMA?LY chooses to live, when nl parent or other adu!thas retained the capability to love, care, or even give the most minimal attention beyond shelter, and farcical dlgmatism. Life is inherently hedonic - pleasure, in the very breathing and senses. Stoic appears to involve the belief that nature is to be tolerated, rather than loved. Yet, by adolescence, one pursues difficult, seemkngly impossible complex and necessarily incremental goals. These are all pleasures. When seeing joe rogaine, the epitome kf antisocial ardogance, i nearly ceased watching, as he was instrumental in kntroducing nazi-equivalent hubris and arrogance intktheUSA earlier thjs month. But he, too, will die,
That particular risk is scalable. Thus he applies his "Precautionary Principle". It all depends on the nature of the risk (scalable or not) and the implied long term assymmetry
It's interesting that masks have become political. I didn't see any or hear comments about surgeons or medical staff wearing their masks in the past. Why would they wear them if they do nothing to protect the wearer and the patient.
@@memumanother5956 it's not about the effectiveness (which is debatable), it's about the freedom to choose whether or not to wear a mask, and the way people who try to live their lives in normalcy without a dirty rag on their face were attacked and literally hated for it by others who think it's ok to remove people's freedoms because they are scared of something. It's a slippery slope.
@jimjones3482 I agree so much political rubbish. It was the same for hydroxychloroquine and they did a trial with 3 times the dose and many people died to try to show it was dangerous I've taken it and ivermectin all safe after. However best to use logic and if I think it's risky then I will wear a mask.
![Nassim Taleb - The Secret Rule That RUNS The WORLD [w/ Naval Ravikant]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/MwlW2aamDFc/mqdefault.jpg)
Fooled by Randomness. Most worthwhile book I have read.
Fantastic book! I enjoyed it more than Black Swan, but all of Nassims stuff is great.
Sounds cool.
@@ALiBi212x😢😢
@@ALiBi212x😮 you😊😊😊
@@ALiBi212xc4u3😮r😢7444r the 44.50 😮😮😢🎉
4:00 Formal education
7:00 The Stoic
11:00 Real life = Suffering/sacrifices
12:00 *Formal education will make you a living. Self education will make you a fortune.*
What sort of sacrifices have you made this week?
Formal education can be very valuable , 1st it forces you to accomplish learning in a limited time frame, 2nd it exposes you to multiple sources of knowledge and accelerates your growth , it makes you have experiences you will probably not know exist or have the stamina or fortitude to complete. One of course should keep growing, education should not be the end but only the start of life long learning.
💯 %
Yes! …and BTW the author himself has many “higher education” diplomas 🤔
Useful nuance, what have you done this month to continue growing?
Charles Darwin was a MD and Einstein got a PhD at the same time as he worked on the Theory of Relativity, soo. Perhaps formal education is useful...
@eirikbelisarius1100 no doubt
The Doers are the major Thinkers.
Interesting statement by Steve Jobs. Beautiful.
Nasim Taleb is an epitome of Wisdom. Super rational and brutally honest
That nasseib Talib quote at the end hit home hard. I plan my day his something goes side ways i get angry. Navals quote was as always inspiring even tho i have heard it multiple times
same here!
Honest question... So what do you do? How to get stuff done?
@@alexanderhomoky1140 do what's most important to you. Eliminate distraction work on things Be Do er not a thinker
What did Naval's quote inspire you to do this month?
Fascinating how both approaches work. Buddhist and Stoic.. what's interesting also is the potential
Ethical issues
this video is so darn high quality, just wow. defo subbin for more.
Thank youu ❣️❣️
Great video. Excellent summary. I wasn’t familiar with the term “anti-fragile” until I watched this video, but I like it and will use it going forward. Thank you!
Thank you ❣️❣️
You are a blessing in my life, thank you so much for your work. 🙏🌟💙
Appreciate that ❣️❣️
Summaries which stay with us for a very long time. Picking nuggets is just 👌🏻
thank youu ❣️
Best summary I've seen so far, and I've seen many :D Fantastic work. Jam-packed with valuable ideas
Thank youu ❣️
Really appreciate that :)
Rule 4 is a game-changer for me. Amazing content. Loved it.
Glad it was valuable :)
Fantastic video, thank you 👍
Thank you very much ❣️
9:14 Wow, best line ever. Buddhist with attitude. Have the last word with fate!
Ha!…my mom just introduced me to the word “flaneur”. She was so excited to have some sort explanation of validation of my character.
hahah!
Amazing. Thank you so much for this. It's crazy we have this knowledge and wisdom for free.
Glad it was helpful!
Amazing as always 🎉
Thank youu ❣️❣️
Dude, great video! Thanks.🎉
Thank you :)
you earned a sub... God tier content!
thank you!
This is gold
Namastey ... Awesome 👌
thank you!
Fantastic work! Thank you.😎
Thank you for watching 🤩
Great channel. Had a alot of use for buildying my business.
Glad to hear!
gj! i call it being armoured.
The catch in your idea is that to really get the value from the books YOU, the individual, has to do the exercise that Picking Nuggets is offering.
The value of the offer is mostly an illusion. The value of wisdom cannot be consumed only earned.
That’s why there’s nobility in being in the entertainment business. 100% of the value is obtained through passive consumption
Very informative
Excellent!
Many thanks!
The book Akshaya by Anand Bhatt is a great follow up to this.
As I was studying stoicism in school it seemed like a dumb fairytale, so something was clearly not adding up. Fortunately at the time I was already starting to detox myself from the bad mindset of today as I had just started my first entrepreneural experience as I turned 18. So I started talking about philosophy to fellows I met at events or online and quickly realised they were always talking about stoicism and many almost "worshipped" it, then my own research about it started, and this was the moment I understood that all there was to school was what legal piece of paper it would have left me and skills (almost exclusively soft ones) it had taught me (on this part it was really good though). Hence I realised I better started fresh with everything I had learnt, since how people perceived it is nonsense (especially history, philisophy and authors of the past, as well as the sense and meaning of literature to which unfortunately many teachers and writers are oblivious to)
Excellent.
Many thanks!
thanks
LOVE YOU❤
Seneca/Tim Ferris talking about living a couple of days a month on the cheap only lands with 1st world, imagine giving this advise to a single mother in a village in a 3d world who has to feed 3 kids. Or someone fleeing the war with only a shirt on their back. But yes, for first world problems all of this is useful.
agree!
Plus seneca was a fraud and charlatan!
Question on Seneca: can someone explain, from a psychological point of view: given the wealth and power Seneca had, would it have been possible for him to truly face abject poverty or tough circumstances to keep him grounded? He had a conscious safety rope and I wonder if a person is truly in abject poverty, would stoicism even apply.
Can anybody share the title of the book? I must read it!!!
Antifragile
Harm avoidance or neuroticism are fragile characteristics, methinks. Obsessive compulsiveness is too.
Imagine the ignorance and damage done if all teenagers decided that high school teachers were "second rate" and they could do better enrolling in the "university of life". This man might be clever, but he is dangerously arrogant, devoid of humility and self-satisfied.
I realised this when i was teenager and everything went smooth. I dont know whats that university of life you mention hahah
@@PickingNuggets smoothly
Actually I think the Saudis are doing a good job in utilizing their resources. On the contrary, Lebanon has all the stressors and yet, these stressors didn’t force them to grow.
Hahaha. This is the same guy who thought the sky was falling during the pandemic.The emperor has no clothes.
1:33 it looks like you aren’t updated ..
Please explain
The interviewer sound like Stewie. Can't unhear it >
what's that?
You're like me ~ don't know who Grothendieck was and why he actually is high rated between mathematicians
Real buddhism has nothing to do with separation from life. That type of thing doesnt even exist.
Wow he should make a book called "What Doesn't Kill You Makes You Stronger", you know, lazily swiping a common cliche for a book title, just like he did with "Skin in the Game"
All the examples from rich western countries
SABB NAA...JHUTH MOBILE KAA..HAIN...REAL...POWER BAS MERE HAATH...HAIN...🥳🥳🥳KUTTE KII PAIDAISH HO TUM SABB....
You’re contradicting yourself.
You’re equating trauma with a limited stressor.
Of course psychologists do not talk about post traumatic growth as defined by you since a limited stressor, in the context of optimal growth, it is not trauma. A limited stressor in this context occurs within the optimal window of challenge and development.
In this context, trauma is by definition NOT a limited stressor. It’s a stressor that overwhelms the internal human system which stays locked in it to a degree that makes it very difficult to unlock. So, no, I’m the context of optimal growth trauma is not a limited stressor.
Yeah, it didn’t come across right. But in his writings, he touches on it just like how you laid it out
Uh
antitititifragilefragile
It is interesting to hear philosophizing about the way one NORMA?LY chooses to live, when nl parent or other adu!thas retained the capability to love, care, or even give the most minimal attention beyond shelter, and farcical dlgmatism.
Life is inherently hedonic - pleasure, in the very breathing and senses. Stoic appears to involve the belief that nature is to be tolerated, rather than loved.
Yet, by adolescence, one pursues difficult, seemkngly impossible complex and necessarily incremental goals.
These are all pleasures.
When seeing joe rogaine, the epitome kf antisocial ardogance, i nearly ceased watching, as he was instrumental in kntroducing nazi-equivalent hubris and arrogance intktheUSA earlier thjs month.
But he, too, will die,
Taleb is an expert on Bitcoin. Just ask him 😂
Flâneur
ua-cam.com/video/ussW-lCEFqA/v-deo.html
Yeah, I don’t know how dumb someone will have to be to take advice from a guy who talks about risk and then wears two masks
That particular risk is scalable. Thus he applies his "Precautionary Principle". It all depends on the nature of the risk (scalable or not) and the implied long term assymmetry
Taken is a one hit wonder hack. he actually knows shit all about most things he talks about and in no way practices what he preaches.
It's interesting that masks have become political. I didn't see any or hear comments about surgeons or medical staff wearing their masks in the past. Why would they wear them if they do nothing to protect the wearer and the patient.
@@memumanother5956 it's not about the effectiveness (which is debatable), it's about the freedom to choose whether or not to wear a mask, and the way people who try to live their lives in normalcy without a dirty rag on their face were attacked and literally hated for it by others who think it's ok to remove people's freedoms because they are scared of something. It's a slippery slope.
@jimjones3482 I agree so much political rubbish. It was the same for hydroxychloroquine and they did a trial with 3 times the dose and many people died to try to show it was dangerous I've taken it and ivermectin all safe after. However best to use logic and if I think it's risky then I will wear a mask.
That video got pretty dumb. As soon as the Taleb talking ended it goes to a guy talking about being born rich. As if Nassim wasn’t
Very ironic by Nassim - that dude is one of the most fragile people out there.
You might want to back that statement with some arguments. Otherwise it’s as informative as a fart in the wind.
The guy literally invented the term antifragile
He is an incredibly bad speaker, good lessons though
Sadly, he's become/is AntiSemetic
Br0, forget the traffic in Paris. It's not healthy. No rounded mirrors at the vertices. Wh@t ! couldn't, D0ne.
Buy cardano
Excellent content, thank you
Much appreciated!