Your Daily Penguin: Chronicle of the Crusades!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 16

  • @ramblingraconteur1616
    @ramblingraconteur1616 4 роки тому +3

    Sordid is the right way to describe the crusades. They start from a negative philosophy and just become more guttural.
    I did enjoy Warriors of God by James Reston Jr. His focus on the personalities of the Third Crusade, both Richard Lion-Heart and Saladin, kept it interesting, not so much the actual history but the weird dynamics driving the conflict. My favorite detail was Richard trying to arrest a peasant (I believe in Sicily) who owned a falcon, only allowed to be possessed by the upper caste. For a paragraph he was the Sheriff of Nottingham!

    • @paulgriffin419
      @paulgriffin419 4 роки тому +2

      That sounds interesting. I think I'll have a look for a copy of Warriors of God when we are free of this pandemic. In the meantime I'll go and have a look at your channel.

    • @Tolstoy111
      @Tolstoy111 Рік тому

      Do you think the conquest of Anatolia was sordid as well? That's what prompted the First Crusade.

  • @pennygraham3767
    @pennygraham3767 4 роки тому +1

    Endlessly fascinating topic.

  • @eddyrandall3677
    @eddyrandall3677 4 роки тому +1

    Penguin also does “Chronicles of the First Crusade” translated by Christopher Tyerman, which gathers together various accounts, and Ibn Munqidh’s “Book of Contemplation: Islam and the Crusades”, translated by Paul M. Cobb, which describes the early Crusades from a first hand Islamic perspective. It would be nice if they could also do a collection of Byzantine perspectives on the Crusades too, maybe including Niketas Choniates’ “History”.

  • @lisagarrity5836
    @lisagarrity5836 4 роки тому +7

    The crusades are not my favorite period of history. They all appear to be a mixture of greed, religious fanatism, xenophobia and flat out stupidity. I do know a couple of people who are interested in the crusades but they look at them from the military/technical point of view. They concentrate on tactics, fortifications, sieges and battles.

    • @NicholasOfAutrecourt
      @NicholasOfAutrecourt 4 роки тому +7

      "Greed, Religious Fanatism, Xenophobia and Flat Out Stupidity" would make a great title if anyone ever wanted to write a history of humanity.

    • @Tolstoy111
      @Tolstoy111 Рік тому

      The first crusade was a response to the conquest of Anatolia by the Seljuk Turks. Would you say that about that event as well?

  • @paulgriffin419
    @paulgriffin419 4 роки тому +2

    I'll try and find a copy Deus Lo Volt whenever we get back to some sort of normality.

    • @saintdonoghue
      @saintdonoghue  4 роки тому +1

      This is the point where I'd automatically offer to find one & send it, but ... yes, some sort of normality.

    • @paulgriffin419
      @paulgriffin419 4 роки тому

      I wouldn't expect that Steve but thank you very much for the thought.

  • @jinseng2303
    @jinseng2303 3 роки тому

    Thank you for this!

  • @cunningba
    @cunningba 4 роки тому

    I seem to remember that Charles Mackay’s “Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds” had rather more on the Crusades than I was willing to wade through at the time I read it 30+ years ago.

  • @MayberryBookclub
    @MayberryBookclub 4 роки тому +1

    Jason?

  • @Decrepit_Productions
    @Decrepit_Productions 4 роки тому +3

    Shouldn't a comprehensive "Chronicles of the Crusades" include writings from Muslim authors?

    • @saintdonoghue
      @saintdonoghue  4 роки тому +1

      Yes indeed! In my ideal 1000-page volume, the accounts would be equally balanced!