Reviving Industrial History - The Restoration Man - S02 EP4 - Home Renovation

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 вер 2024
  • Join Tim and Emma Verdun as they embark on the restoration journey of a 19th-century engine house, the sole survivor of a once-thriving brick-making works. In the heart of rural Oxfordshire, this passionate couple, along with their three children, aims to reclaim and transform the derelict monument into their dream home. Facing challenges from planning issues to tight deadlines, witness the restoration warriors' race against time to make the building watertight, secure a mortgage, and unveil the mysteries of its industrial past. From structural challenges to unexpected setbacks, follow the Verduns' extraordinary efforts to breathe new life into this historical gem.
    -------
    The Restoration Man features architect George Clarke as he explores the UK, discovering unique buildings being transformed into homes. Each episode highlights a different historical structure, like windmills, churches, and towers, focusing on their restoration, architectural significance, and the personal stories of the homeowners involved. This series blends history, architecture, and inspiring renovation tales.
    -------
    Welcome to Banijay Home & Garden, your go-to destination for all things DIY, gardening, and landscaping. 🏠🌲
    Banijay Home & Garden features the best shows on home renovation, gardening tips, and stunning landscaping projects. Explore our collection of full episodes from popular series like Location, Location, Location, Extreme Makeover Home Edition, and Portrait Artist of the Year. Join us on this exciting journey of transforming houses into dream homes and creating beautiful outdoor spaces.
    Subscribe to our channel and never miss a moment of home and garden inspiration: www.youtube.co...
    #homediy #gardeningtips #landscapingprojects #homerenovation
  • Розваги

КОМЕНТАРІ • 240

  • @mscharylee
    @mscharylee 4 роки тому +41

    I think it is ridiculous how a planning board can make so much trouble for people who are putting so much money and hard work trying to restore historical buildings which are mainly eyesores until they are completed. The family has done a superb job on this place.

    • @GrumpusMaximus83
      @GrumpusMaximus83 Рік тому +5

      What I would think is that if one is putting their blood and sweat into preservation then why would you make it difficult ? One would think that they would encourage them to doing right by it, by being enablers, as opposed to being oppressive in their outlook and doings. Travesty, is what I would state it is in their way of being overseers. Encourage and not discourage. That is the way to go is what I would presume.

    • @59tante
      @59tante Рік тому +3

      I agree

    • @reasonablyserious
      @reasonablyserious Рік тому +3

      On the other hand, they might be useful in deterring the more sacrilegious types, at least sometimes

    • @Tekoa80
      @Tekoa80 Рік тому +2

      Very true. It's not like they'd submitted something completely hideous or not in keeping with the original building. And why does it need to take so long? 🤔 😕

    • @pratiksevankar6923
      @pratiksevankar6923 8 місяців тому

      The brits and their ways of doing work

  • @lpalacios1
    @lpalacios1 4 роки тому +49

    So INFURIATING to be broken into twice. This family has earned this viewer’s respect and awe!

    • @maryfrump7937
      @maryfrump7937 3 роки тому +2

      A nice Rottweiler would have been a cheap deterrent.

    • @stephenobrien5909
      @stephenobrien5909 Рік тому

      @@maryfrump7937 Funny how they went after the copper. Must have been off season for tarmacing.

  • @kellyanneree3252
    @kellyanneree3252 4 роки тому +71

    What a beautiful family! Those children are so well mannered and grateful for their house! Good job parents, keep doing what you are doing!!! Love the house!

  • @mollymorgan8652
    @mollymorgan8652 2 роки тому +16

    This couple is one of the most practical I've seen on these shows. It was very smart of them to complete the house to make it totally livable and postpone the extension. As it is, the house has all of the rooms they really need, and they don't even have to make any children share a bedroom. Better to get back to work and save up a bit before adding space that's just an extra luxury.
    It seems a bit crazy to leave one's job to work on the build, but it appears he did the calculations and realized he was making less than he would pay for a builder's laborer, so that's practical. They seem like one couple who haven't ended up with massive overruns.
    It's never a great idea to proceed before you've gotten planning permission/a permit, though. It's lucky they got approved, though it seemed like the official was actually pretty reasonable about ultimately approving the things they wanted. Still, it stinks that the approval process takes so long. I think most people have no idea how long it takes. I certainly didn't expect to wait over about two months to have my straightforward, well drawn, and fully code compliant, non-historic-district deck plans approved here in the US. That set us back to waiting out the winter before building, so I can definitely sympathize with people who think they're starting out with enough time before winter, but are tripped up by the bureaucratic process.

  • @adam_lux4691
    @adam_lux4691 2 роки тому +11

    What a lovely family!!!

  • @paulhayton3423
    @paulhayton3423 4 роки тому +60

    What a wonderful couple, with that attitude anything is possible, I admire them.

    • @sjefhendrickx2257
      @sjefhendrickx2257 3 роки тому +1

      Snobs! With money its possible!

    • @gabrielepage8598
      @gabrielepage8598 2 роки тому +2

      @@sjefhendrickx2257 Need glasses? Did you fail to see the incredible amount of hard work they did?!?!

  • @nancyn347
    @nancyn347 Рік тому +1

    This turned out to be such a lovely, cozy, warm home. Love how they resisted the modern decor that so many people like. This wasn't a listed property, and yet the planning dept still has stringent guidelines. So frustrating! Thanks for the upload.

  • @sazennonumber
    @sazennonumber 2 роки тому +5

    I can't get enough of these restoration videos with George. Also, I keep thinking how lots of these people end up being broke at the end.. 😥 Perhaps It would be possible to save a bit in unorthodox materials, at least inside. Not sure... but, some of them were at least able to save on labour. This couple was, I think, smart to move in. So sad that someone kept breaking in.

  • @lupodisol
    @lupodisol Рік тому +2

    Beautiful family, beautiful restoration, fantastic history of making bricks! Bend, Oregon

  • @grahamforbes5200
    @grahamforbes5200 4 роки тому +24

    What an amazing job that this lovely family achieved. As a Chairman of Planning in an adjacent planning authority, I empathise with their frustration with local Authority bureaucracy. I hope that during my 4-year tenure in Cherwell, we were more sympathetic to wonderful people like this couple, than the Vale of the White Horse. Initially, I had a similar problem with over-enthusiastic officers. I and my committee quelled their 'jobs-worth' attitude to planning. The greatest achievement of elected members was, in my opinion, Bicester Village. The officers wanted it to be in Banbury, but my committee resisted and we won, to the enormous benefit of our district.

    • @Eleivana777
      @Eleivana777 3 роки тому +8

      Something I am not quite clear on, having watched a great number of these UK restoration videos. And that is, a structure that is on the verge of crumbling into the dust is purchased by people wanting to restore it. Yet they often seem to come up against almost draconian rules and limitations by some 'planning commission.' Yet if the building hadn't been purchased, it would indeed self destruct. It seems like a 'cut off my nose to spite my face' conundrum by the planners. Would they rather see these old buildings crumble or have a chance at a second life? Maybe they should loosen up some of their many, many strict requirements.

    • @grahamforbes5200
      @grahamforbes5200 3 роки тому +8

      @@Eleivana777 You are absolutely correct. I, as a past Chairman of a District Planning Committee, often came up against this attitude from Planning Officers in my Council. It stems from their education at university, where theory is more important than saving a building. Having said that with a 'listed building' (a building deemed to be of architectural or cultural importance) does need some protection. A three hundred-year-old barn should not have plastic windows, I am sure most people would agree. However, some of the objections by employed officers of the planning authority, British Heritage, etc., do tend to make purist decisions, most of which never see a planning committee, as they are delegated powers. Every applicant does have the right to appeal, first to the Chief Planning Officer and then, if necessary, to the government inspector. This is both a time consuming and costly exercise with little chance of success. I do agree that a more pragmatic approach is sometimes needed.

    • @Eleivana777
      @Eleivana777 3 роки тому +3

      @@grahamforbes5200 Well said. Yes I agree that preserving, as much as humanly possible, the style, materials and techniques used in the original building, is very,very important. However, I have seen some couple who have poured every cent of their finances, blood, sweat and tears into a building only to have their dreams crumble when a planning officer insists on something that they would never be able to afford or achieve or that would never serve their family's practical needs (I.e. an extension) Very sad.

    • @alexandrosmograine3094
      @alexandrosmograine3094 2 роки тому +5

      I understand the need to preserve a historic building as close to the original as possible, but what I do not understand is why it takes so much time.

  • @CherylSimser
    @CherylSimser 4 роки тому +12

    What a lovely and hard-working family! Amazing job and beautifully well-done.

    • @replyno1
      @replyno1 3 роки тому +5

      Parents have great work ethic and are great role models for the their lovely children.

  • @andreaandrea6716
    @andreaandrea6716 3 роки тому +4

    Blessings on the heads of all those who restore beautiful old, (and USUALLY) well made buildings!

  • @melinaellvin3633
    @melinaellvin3633 3 роки тому +8

    The children shouting yaaay when getting the extention approved was the cutest thing. It really made my day.
    37:04

  • @dandetmer6336
    @dandetmer6336 3 роки тому +3

    Excellent ooutcome. Very very nice decisions inside. These
    Restorers r always with great attitudes and very hard workers. Very determined.

  • @erdysoliman816
    @erdysoliman816 8 місяців тому +32

    What a beautifully done ua-cam.com/users/postUgkxYGamVaHfdHiPlAQaLa7zkwR02OKpGYDU ! The instructions and the photographs are brilliant. It is thorough and genuinely informative. Ryan got another winner! No one does it better!

  • @garyhopper819
    @garyhopper819 4 роки тому +40

    This was 9 years ago I would luv to see a follow up on this family and property!

  • @LorraineinPNW
    @LorraineinPNW 3 роки тому +7

    Such a great family! Hopefully they are still in their beautiful home.

  • @StarryNightKnitting
    @StarryNightKnitting Рік тому +1

    A great restoration and the best of all to me is this amazing family who have 3 very lovely children! So nice to see how willing they are to pitch in and help. Also, I think that family worked together so much and the wait etc. they seemed to adapt and accept and live in a lot of inconvenience without getting down or complaining. Beautiful living space they created and lovely home! So nice their horses can be nearby and they most likely will continue their hard work on the outside and grounds! Best to you all!!!

  • @ArreyAchere-bw5se
    @ArreyAchere-bw5se 2 місяці тому

    Congratulations George T&E. Thanks George doing a great job

  • @fionagregory8078
    @fionagregory8078 4 роки тому +20

    I just love watching and listening to.George Clarke. He is my ideal man but 13 yrs younger than I am. Long live George Clarke.

  • @amyschwebke4007
    @amyschwebke4007 4 роки тому +34

    George is such a cutie pie and ever so excited about the history of each project.

    • @annpartoon5300
      @annpartoon5300 4 роки тому +1

      would love to tie his hands behind his back

    • @fionagregory8078
      @fionagregory8078 4 роки тому

      @@annpartoon5300 I saw him first. Everything about him is so wonderful.

  • @mariajoseribeiroduartenobr3462
    @mariajoseribeiroduartenobr3462 4 роки тому +11

    lovely home ,brave couple ,just amazing restoration

  • @lydiarowe491
    @lydiarowe491 4 роки тому +4

    What a gorgeous family..this is a fairytale for them that has enriched an already amazing life..🏤⭐🏤

  • @allanb52
    @allanb52 4 роки тому +7

    Really nice restoration, posh lot but nice family, well done with that.

  • @imari2305
    @imari2305 4 роки тому +29

    What I don't understand is this; if the building wasn't listed then why does the planning committee need to have a say in how the building should be restored? They bought a shell with no roof!! Of course they wanted to maintain the history which is why they put so much effort into restoring it but damn! These planning committees obviously have nothing else better to do than to waste people's time and money.

    • @ciaobella8963
      @ciaobella8963 4 роки тому +4

      In Italy, we can do pretty much anything we want on the inside of a house or apartment. But the building permit folks get very involved in outside restorations because they are trying to keep the original design and feel of ancient villages and communities throughout Italy. I understand that actually. But getting a permit to build on plain land (all of which is called agricultural land whether anything was ever grown or grazed on it) is all but impossible here. If there was a shed or other building to serve animals etc. on it, then a permit may be possible. Getting an extension on the shed however... nope. Unless of course there is graft and passing of money under tables. And I doubt this is much different in the UK.

    • @MaZEEZaM
      @MaZEEZaM 4 роки тому +5

      and its was pretty cobbled together with modern brick too, I really don't understand the attraction to this shell of a building, to me its just an ordinary ugly old brick shell.

    • @midgie4410
      @midgie4410 4 роки тому +4

      @@MaZEEZaM I see what you're saying,however with it being a shell,they can build it how they want it

  • @hilltop9098
    @hilltop9098 2 роки тому +1

    Lovely hardworking family, beautiful home. ❤️🇬🇧

  • @dennisblake2498
    @dennisblake2498 Рік тому +1

    I’d rebuild with the reclamation and salvage route eg doors windows fittings kitchen stairs bricks etc all reclaimed and salvage in keeping with the buildings age and character on the outside and some of the inside interior, that way the planning is kept happy.

  • @marthabergin9023
    @marthabergin9023 3 роки тому +2

    They did a lovely job.

  • @hectorkeezy1499
    @hectorkeezy1499 2 роки тому +1

    What lovely family. So much love there. Well done.🇩🇰❤️🙋🏻‍♂️

  • @wendymaddock7705
    @wendymaddock7705 Рік тому

    Beautiful building xx wow 😊xx

  • @Suzyfromtheblock
    @Suzyfromtheblock 2 роки тому

    Lovely xxxxx god bless em

  • @trevortodor5596
    @trevortodor5596 2 роки тому

    Great couple and episode

  • @bg147
    @bg147 3 роки тому +3

    They bought a brick wall with weeds. Cute happy kids, though. I would have skipped the addition for the time being, restored the original structure, and lived in the place for 5 years to determine additional needs. The brick work is nice.

  • @donnaaranda7175
    @donnaaranda7175 3 роки тому +4

    The fact one would need permission to have solar panels is mind blowing.

  • @annamarsch6091
    @annamarsch6091 4 роки тому +2

    Sweet Family.

  • @lindastorey6685
    @lindastorey6685 4 роки тому +19

    I've watched a few of these ,and cannot believe that the people expect to totally resurrect a derelict building with so little money .

    • @be6388
      @be6388 4 роки тому +4

      I was stunned by the price of 'the house'...320.000,00 pounds?
      ...there was no house!🤔
      there was a wild garden, arounded by some bric walls at risk of collapse!

    • @sjefhendrickx2257
      @sjefhendrickx2257 3 роки тому

      Blabla about the money. We never know!

    • @donnash5813
      @donnash5813 3 роки тому

      @@be6388 It was probably a lot for the land. I doubt that 'house' had any value. They said it wasn't even listed as a structure.

    • @nancyn347
      @nancyn347 Рік тому

      @@be6388 don't forget, the property included 6 acres of land. Real estate has never been cheap in the UK.

  • @jicjac9569
    @jicjac9569 4 роки тому +135

    i know these buildings have historical value but the planning authority should alteast go easy on these people who are trying to save the property. They are so strict yet not do anything while the properties succumb to the forces of nature.

    • @JUST_ONE_ID10T
      @JUST_ONE_ID10T 4 роки тому +24

      Right and that property wasn't even listed! They could of put in planning for a new building on site and taken it down. So why are they so picky about redoing it when it isn't even a listed building!

    • @jamessmith7691
      @jamessmith7691 4 роки тому +9

      I couldn't have said it better.

    • @anne4083
      @anne4083 4 роки тому +14

      I say this each time I watch any program like this!! Nothing is said or done when these buildings are lying dangerously derelict!! It makes me so angry!! 😠

    • @chadsimmons6347
      @chadsimmons6347 4 роки тому +16

      Exactly, the planners sit about having tea watching the slow demise, then latch on like parasites throwing every rule in the book for attempting to revive the old structure

    • @lydiarowe491
      @lydiarowe491 4 роки тому +13

      Agree completely..bureaucrats gone made with their power...no wonder so many of these historical buildings are left to the elements..it's just too hard...an advocacy could be created to cut through the red tape..to get on with saving these places..⭐

  • @1964corvan
    @1964corvan 5 місяців тому

    found it on google maps, and its all completed now. looks nice.

  • @kutrabilada8865
    @kutrabilada8865 4 роки тому +40

    I am surpprised she didn't say they will be in by Christmas.

  • @trevortaylor5501
    @trevortaylor5501 3 роки тому

    History is so fascinating!

  • @ianbeddowes5362
    @ianbeddowes5362 3 роки тому +1

    The Romans left by 410 CE. So it was far more than 700 years before brick was used again.

  • @raquelrozendaaguiar3939
    @raquelrozendaaguiar3939 Рік тому

    ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

  • @YZ3_580
    @YZ3_580 4 роки тому +70

    This is the normal structure of this show:
    George introduces the couple - usually they either have no experience, no money, or both.
    George arrives - everything is "ab-so-loootely fantastic".
    George announces the first problem - either no planning permission, no money, or a wood worm infestation.
    George makes the owners feel terrible about what they've done by continuing to highlight all of the problems and hammer them home (pun intended).
    A brief period where things go quite well.
    But then it starts snowing, George reminds everyone that it's the worst snow fall in 3 generations, the planning application is rejected, and the mother is expecting her 10th child. George is also very careful to point out the terrible structural work, and reminds the couple that their house will collapse if they don't fork out another £50,000 for urgent repair work.
    The couple is going to have to declare bankruptcy, live on the streets, or leave the country.
    George turns up 6 months later - everything has been finished, the house looks quite good (except for the cheap furnishings and the awful colour scheme), George can't fit in enough "ab-so-loootely brilliant / stunning / beautiful" or similar words in his limited lexicon, he presents them with that tacky book that they don't really want, and then leaves us with a trite, cliched and hackneyed concluding line with appropriate pauses, such as "They finally got the house....that they so richly deserve".
    Yet despite the above, I love this show.

  • @hollyhold562
    @hollyhold562 Рік тому

    The vandalism, at one end of the rule of law (no rule), and the regulations of the community -- sorted organization, the Planning Commission (onerous slog rules): Yet, they triumphed over both extremes.
    Because, virtue, sacrifice, and focusing on a dream are their own reward.

  • @sheriewoodall3631
    @sheriewoodall3631 4 роки тому +4

    I do not understand why people are so shocked when an unsecured work site is robbed. Every single one of these shows seems to have theft. It is a prevailing issue. Hang a few outdoor lights and some security cameras if you are going to leave a work site totally unattended and open to deter thieves.

  • @sidewaysthroughthekitchend3075
    @sidewaysthroughthekitchend3075 4 роки тому +23

    i really have to ask this long winded question. I'm In Canada, and my community does have "Heritage Designated" properties, but as I've seen your "English Heritage" boards exceed local LEGAL building code by-laws. i.e, that wonderful train water tower with a grade 2 designation. Heritage says no fire escape, building code says fire escape etc.. I understand grade 1, no doubt, but 2 and non listed buildings? I also understand heritage has relaxed lately I guess as per modern concepts on add on's to existing but why doesn't someone start to bring Heritage to court over loss of finances, delays in personally comfort etc. Seriously weeks on end to get approval for the tonal color of a tile roof? Months to get approval for a lot of building plans. what do these people do? I dont believe they have have 100 restorations on the go, and they work 60 hours a week to keep up with the demand. seems the supply is not their. Another question, when they get outrageously ridiculous (of which I've witnessed on all these restoration channels) why not just put your middle finger in air and do it anyway WHEN it affects your bottom to a severe degree? I'd let them fine me and than sue them. I lived in your country for a year, and yes your a different culture (personally I loved it) but come people, stand up to some of this garbage of jumping through hoops otherwise all these sites are going to rubble by mother nature. Heritage is a detriment. they should more consult than dictate. And dont tell me to mind my Canadian business, I have blood and family ties in Folkstown

    • @replyno1
      @replyno1 3 роки тому

      I have seen them tear down a low garden wall in the front yard, which was beautifully constructed with lights. This was in London in a conservation neighborhood. So it's ok to leave a old crumbling garden wall then rebuild a nice new one! Needless to say the neighborhood looks really shabby with broken lead windows and things falling apart.

    • @nancyn347
      @nancyn347 Рік тому

      I, too, am from Canada, and my understanding is that if people ignored the planners and went ahead with their renovation/restoration, those same planners will order the owner to remove offending work if it's not passed. If the owner doesn't remove it, then there are escalating repercussions. Ultimately, the planners will remove whatever it is they don't approve, and charge the owner with the removal. You really can't ignore the Planning councils in the UK.

  • @timothymercer3526
    @timothymercer3526 3 роки тому +1

    Well done your family has left it's Mark on the neighborhood and ensured the history of the property is not lost you should be so proud.

  • @derekstocker6661
    @derekstocker6661 4 роки тому +3

    Once again we have the scenario of a derelict building, falling down literally and the authorities sit by and watch and do absolutely zero!
    Then, along comes someone with a sense of saving and transforming and then along come the authorities and tell them exactly what they must do, typical UK way of looking at things and thank goodness we have folks like this family and George to get to work and turn these sad buildings around BUT with absolutely no financial help from the authorities that dictate every move. There is preserving heritage and then there's just nit picking someone who is trying to conserve heritage.
    No wonder many of these buildings are still allowed to rot and fall down.
    Why do these people working hard to develop these places not be more security conscious, this is the third one of these that we have watched that fell foul to intruders, live on site in a mobile home or caravan possibly....

  • @paisley293
    @paisley293 3 роки тому +16

    They build a beautiful, warm family home, nothing ostentatious or over the top. Lovely family, perfect home!

  • @karlkamal2047
    @karlkamal2047 3 роки тому

    Lovely

  • @scrapeyhawkins5299
    @scrapeyhawkins5299 3 роки тому +1

    I moved in on site while the builder did work....house wasn't really fit to live in ....good thing I was the builder

  • @ElsieDreamWorld
    @ElsieDreamWorld Рік тому

    Incredible! How heartless those thieves. Well, they wouldn’t be thieves otherwise, but it made me so angry! How this family has been struggling to now suffer this. Makes me think if there’s a hidden motive for these burglaries, maybe the thieves wanted the building?

    • @seaneendelong8065
      @seaneendelong8065 Рік тому

      Back when this was made roght through today it is the same answer:
      Copper thieves are almost always druggies looking to sell it to scrap dealers for cash, which they then use to buy more drugs with.

  • @thepickledfish3631
    @thepickledfish3631 2 роки тому +1

    I would bet that someone on the camera crew is the one who is thieving from the properties.

  • @abuubaydullah1
    @abuubaydullah1 4 роки тому +1

    Its Awesome what they have done, now the real hard bit paying for it all .

  • @funkmachine9094
    @funkmachine9094 Рік тому

    this is one case where i see the "house" and think that they might as well take it down and build a completely new house from the ground up

  • @helenaneumann1872
    @helenaneumann1872 3 роки тому +1

    It is understandable and only to be welcomed that historical buildings should be preserved, but a fuss that the authorities make around ruins is presumptuous. This building was on the verge of collapse. The authorities should be happy that the building is being preserved and that the facade is being restored to its former glory. However, it must be possible for the restoration to be adapted to the needs of the residents.

  • @eecforeststewardship640
    @eecforeststewardship640 4 роки тому +1

    the planning is straight forward- when you don't do your paperwork, you can't move forward.

  • @debrap947
    @debrap947 4 роки тому +3

    Planning commission should be more helpful and co-operative when someone wants to save these old derelict buildings.

  • @Tom-Lahaye
    @Tom-Lahaye 3 роки тому +1

    Those planners! I can understand there is legislation to ensure a building is safe and fit for use, and to avoid absurd looking buildings with yellow roofs.
    But it has gone too far, not just any slate tile is good enough for them, no it has to be scrutinised if they are happy enough with it's color, structure, size and quality.
    Come on, it is a derelict building outside the village, next to a railway line and some industrial units, why so picky?
    I think they have done well on this restoration, and it is a very snug house, I would feel as happy in it as these people do.

  • @MultiSirens
    @MultiSirens 4 роки тому +43

    Blinking red tape none sense ! The building was falling down it had been derelict for years upon years, and now the civil servants who have to justify their jobs, are calling the shots? Garbage!

  • @midgie4410
    @midgie4410 4 роки тому

    The blue door doesn't match at all. Sticks out like a sore thumb. They did a great job tho and I love the brick floor

    • @hunkhk
      @hunkhk 2 роки тому

      i liked that blue door was a bit quirky :) each to their own i guess

  • @georgewashington3164
    @georgewashington3164 4 роки тому +1

    Bureaucrats of all kinds demonstrate their importance insisting that such buildings are part of history, whilst they are just old decaying barns close to collapse. Who can guarantee that this building won't collapse onto your or your children's heads? Nobody. This is why I believe that old buildings must be destroyed to ground. And then, if you really want, recreated close to original design using modern engineering and materials.

  • @derekcraig3617
    @derekcraig3617 3 роки тому +2

    It's absolutely ridiculous that the planning authorities have so much power over the build process. It makes me thankful not to live in a country with such a heavy-handed government. And I'm very aware they are trying to preserve historical architecture but the planners weren't doing anything to keep the building standing...

  • @kennethpensyl7791
    @kennethpensyl7791 4 роки тому

    amazing, too bad they haven't made some of the kilns for the kids bedrooms.

  • @nevets7152
    @nevets7152 4 роки тому

    These programs and their bloody music. Steve in Thailand.

  • @Saraseeksthompson0211
    @Saraseeksthompson0211 2 роки тому

    365,000 for the state it was in? It should have been 100,000 at most. This is why so many of these buildings fall to ruin. They cost hundreds of thousands to restore. They did a lovely job, but I wish these properties would be sold for less so more people can hav ether opportunity to restore and preserve them.

  • @wecreatezone8940
    @wecreatezone8940 4 роки тому

    The brick woman has a voice like Anne Robinson 27:09.

  • @kellychamberlain6093
    @kellychamberlain6093 3 роки тому

    Keep Closed To keep the planner out.

  • @Teenagegoogoomuk
    @Teenagegoogoomuk 3 роки тому

    I live in the US and yes codes are necessary. My question is do you have to go by planning registry if you are using your own money? I'm a commercial electrician and have been doing this for some 30 years and just cant believe that the "AUTHORITIES" are so stringent on these buildings. I realize shady work is done all the time which is why I guess here in the US we have inspections: Also the fact that all of our buildings are probably around 100 yrs old or less and not worthy of the task.

  • @McEveley1
    @McEveley1 Рік тому

    The problem with local planning authorities is they in this case have done nothing to this building for 100 Years!!
    Now that someone has commited to bringing this building back into use, THEY, want to say what they want done!!
    I understand the need to make sure all is safely done and an eyesore is not being errected.
    But to start dictating the tile to be used Etc. REALLY!
    A clear case of we want everyone to know that we are in charge, and want them to pay for the priviledge.
    They would have quite happily have let that building crumble to the ground and then watch as some builder replaces it with a modern building.
    Is this reasonable?

  • @eliotreader8220
    @eliotreader8220 2 роки тому

    portable steam engine

  • @jackrussel8898
    @jackrussel8898 Рік тому

    Patched up with a different colour cement pointing not good for the outside brickwork look

  • @kellychamberlain6093
    @kellychamberlain6093 3 роки тому +1

    Please give my 10 year old a job.

  • @1isaM111er
    @1isaM111er 3 роки тому

    The tyranny of local planning who are steeped in incompetence.

  • @fionagregory8078
    @fionagregory8078 4 роки тому +7

    He is good looking but with a lovely speaking voice too.

    • @MaZEEZaM
      @MaZEEZaM 4 роки тому

      You are complimenting him, no BUT needed. "He is good looking with a lovely speaking voice too."

    • @midgie4410
      @midgie4410 4 роки тому

      Disagree

    • @fionagregory8078
      @fionagregory8078 4 роки тому

      @@MaZEEZaM whatever........

  • @MatthewCyUK
    @MatthewCyUK 2 роки тому +1

    How officious and self-serving our planning authorities are in this country. Literally standing in the way and holding things up to justify their existence and causing unnecessary stress and delay for the families who've DECIDED to preserve an historic building (which the authorities deemed fit not to have listed, it's apparently that precious). The ARROGANCE of them saying they are concerned about preserving the original character of the building... er, what did YOU LOT DO MEANWHILE?! My god.
    Upon having to re-apply, I would have just torn it down and said "sorry it fell down" on the first rejection and built something from the "fallen" bricks. You can't preserve rubble. Absolute charlatans. There's a reason why everybody hates planning officers; elevated to have power well above their station and educated far, far beyond their intellect. Anyway, it's all on show here.
    But well done that family on a remarkable job!

  • @seanmcguire7974
    @seanmcguire7974 4 роки тому

    White treads on the steps?

  • @christycarpenter1087
    @christycarpenter1087 3 роки тому

    Update!!!

  • @pathenshaw9383
    @pathenshaw9383 4 роки тому +2

    As an american I cannot understand how a FREE people, such as the Brits, could countenance for one moment the determinations of a "planning commission" with those kinds of arbitrary guidelines.

    • @derekstocker6661
      @derekstocker6661 4 роки тому

      It's not as if they are going to make a fun fair out of it, a certain amount of "friendly advice" possibly but laying down the law after doing nothing about the place is wrong.

  • @storiesneedears
    @storiesneedears 4 роки тому +1

    What I don't get is why people are charged a fortune to buy a house that is totally run down.

    • @donnash5813
      @donnash5813 3 роки тому +1

      Most of the cost was probably for the land. It was 6 acres.

  • @jamessmith7691
    @jamessmith7691 4 роки тому +1

    I watch all of your shows as they come along. The other British show is good but for the overbearing music. Keep up the good work.

    • @donnash5813
      @donnash5813 3 роки тому

      This is the first I have watched of this series. That other one is so annoying because they never show anything finished (and the loud music).

  • @midgie1166
    @midgie1166 Рік тому

    Kitchen in a garage?!🤔

  • @fonhollohan2908
    @fonhollohan2908 2 роки тому

    wow They must of being completely gutted when they were broken into twice. What's so crazy is that they followed the advice of the planning commission and they rejected their initial plans that does even make any sense for heavens sake. What I don't understand is why this non listed building required such strict building requirements when it was a derelict building to begin with and if they didn't fix it, it would 've been saved at all. These building restrictions are beyond reasonable and how do folks even manage to afford such projects when these authorities set them back by being so unreasonable. They all seem to be complete control freaks, with their regulations that folks are barely able to meet the demands that these officials place on them, it makes no bloody sense, are they all on drugs or something? I just don't get it.

  • @jonashagstrom4664
    @jonashagstrom4664 Місяць тому

    Solar panels are ugly and ruin the appearance of a house. I would build a shed instead with optimal orientation and roof angle for solar power. Also let the whole side of the roof facing the sun be covered with panels. Then run cables into the main house.

  • @fivizzano
    @fivizzano 4 роки тому +5

    planning commissions should be BANNED from interfering AT ALL .....

  • @tomokra
    @tomokra 4 роки тому +1

    These people bring dressing in layers to an entirely ridiculous level ...

  • @kevinduffy6712
    @kevinduffy6712 4 роки тому +2

    These restoration projects are all the same theme !.Buy a ruin in November !, Knock most of it down , Then promise the wife that you will be in by Xmas ! ( Knocking the wife up is a lot quicker ).As most of them do ?, Then realise that you are short of money before it is even wether proof !.Miraculously money appears from banks or savings to finish the joint ?.And the furnishings . These have to be done by a interior designer , (And so have the kitchens ).Also there is never any mention of the rug rat pissing on the designer lounge or rug ?.Or spewing up ?. For that mater , ( As well as painting on the walls with thee shit !). .

  • @getin3949
    @getin3949 4 роки тому +2

    UGH, burgundy, its such an old fashioned color.

    • @patriciaagbewornu8696
      @patriciaagbewornu8696 4 роки тому +2

      Its actually rich warm and classy.

    • @fionagregory8078
      @fionagregory8078 4 роки тому

      if that is what they want, let them. It is COLOUR anyway. We are British and BEST!

  • @kevinduffy6712
    @kevinduffy6712 4 роки тому +1

    Having said the below !.A really good restoration !, Except the blue door ?. That's a blue that isn't natural !!!!!What needs doing is sand blast the whole lot then age the new brick work then re seal it . And paint the frigging door white like the windows !!.

    • @kellyanneree3252
      @kellyanneree3252 4 роки тому +4

      It's their house! Their choice! None of anyone's business.... unless contributing to the mortgage! Down with the communist planning tyrants too!

    • @kevinduffy6712
      @kevinduffy6712 4 роки тому

      @@kellyanneree3252 yep I agree on that one

    • @donnash5813
      @donnash5813 3 роки тому +1

      They may have found some trace of blue paint from the original door and decided to honor the heritage or whatever.

    • @kevinduffy6712
      @kevinduffy6712 3 роки тому +1

      @@donnash5813 or they got it cheap ?

  • @lorrygeewhizzbang9521
    @lorrygeewhizzbang9521 2 роки тому

    It's rather nonsense that these planing boards would rather the building fell to the ground than just approve materials to protect it and stop wasting peoples time and money.

  • @williamkimmel6487
    @williamkimmel6487 2 роки тому +5

    The vandals are absolutely disgusting. Thank goodness this wonderful family didn't give up.
    Kim

  • @johnruan
    @johnruan 4 роки тому

    hampton court was a catholic bishops home, it was funded and built by catholics and filled with art work, the royals stole it all...fact. and the bricks came from rome.

  • @sjefhendrickx2257
    @sjefhendrickx2257 3 роки тому

    If you can afford it you do those things, nothing for normal hardworking people with low wages.

  • @walterulasinksi7031
    @walterulasinksi7031 4 роки тому

    When the planning office pulls garbage, then just do it as a fait a comple.. then refuse to accept any obstruction from planning.
    And tell them that if they want something torn down, the planning office will have to do it themselves. Since planning offices do not hav that kind of,money, they will relent .

    • @panaxion
      @panaxion 4 роки тому +1

      They will tear it down, and send you the bill, or take you to court and force you to

  • @MontoyaBrandy
    @MontoyaBrandy 2 роки тому

    Sounds like a bunch of controlling oligarchs! I’ve never heard such foolishness!

  • @mohit2010ify
    @mohit2010ify 3 роки тому +1

    And plz stop referring to continents or cluster of countries as world 1,2,3. Its sounds like I come from a 3rd class country. It’s a colonial term sounds very discriminatory.

    • @mollymorgan8652
      @mollymorgan8652 2 роки тому

      Actually, it's a Cold War Era term. 1st World = Allied Western Democracies, 2nd World = USSR and allies, and 3rd World = countries allied with neither. Although it is commonly used to indicate a country's economic development level, that's not its origin.

  • @A1DJPaul
    @A1DJPaul 2 роки тому

    Quitting Your Jobs? What is going to Pay the Mortgage & Bank Loans & Fund Living in an OVER BUDGET HOUSE, With EXCESSIVE BUILD COSTS. & Long Term Running Costs ?
    This is 100% COMEDY.
    If I Drive Past i Will Be KIND & Donate them a POT NOODLE Each for Christmas 2021.
    FUCKIN HELL WHAT a MESS.

  • @kcsunnyone
    @kcsunnyone 2 роки тому

    I dislike the parents using their kids as excuses for their own poor planning of their project. The excuse to move in was because they registered the kids into new school

  • @Armlesscrayon
    @Armlesscrayon 4 роки тому +4

    Nice restoration, but I have to say use of an interior designer would go a long way to get rid of those awful sofas and the colour of the walls. Seems like no one in Britain has any decor taste lol...IMO of course.

    • @NYCHeartandSoul
      @NYCHeartandSoul 3 роки тому +2

      They probably reused their existing furniture. It’s homey and can always be changed later. They did a brilliant job and the kids are thrilled as well having been part of the process.

    • @Armlesscrayon
      @Armlesscrayon 3 роки тому

      @@NYCHeartandSoul No disrespect to my British cousins. This is my own opinion, I find the taste in decor is not mine. Lol

  • @bnavveer6674
    @bnavveer6674 3 роки тому

    The immense march normally grab because nylon ectrodactyly level with a wealthy distributor. luxuriant, tacky action