ExtremeFlight 67" Laser Exp RxR and AM670 Test • RC Plane Review
Вставка
- Опубліковано 29 вер 2024
- This is my maiden flight of the 67" ExtremeFlight Laser Exp Receiver Ready.
PRODUCT LINKS
► EF 67" Laser Exp RxR: extremeflightr...
RCVR LINKS
► Support the work I do here on Patreon: / rcvideoreviews
► RCVR MERCH rcvideoreviews...
► Discord - Hang out with the RCVR Crew: / discord
AFFILIATE LINKS
► Amazon Affiliate: amzn.to/3lEz5ZL
► Banggood Affiliate: www.banggood.c...
#RCVideoReviews
![[UA] NAVI проти G2 Esports | Blast Premier Fall Final](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/QWlIm4FGESQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Hi Rc Video Reviews, I really enjoy to watch your videos, the content is really informative for me, you deserve a million subscribers.
May I ask you something?
What receiver you use on this rc airplane, and what sensors you use for the telemetry?
Thanks
Thanks for the kind comment. I use ELRS on all my fixed wing and currently no external sensors. Everything is built-in to the receivers I use. In this case, it's an ER6.
I see you suggested the Skywing 67 laser to somebody in the comments. It's not because it's a little less money, it's because it's available. So I'm getting one. But do you have any thoughts on how it compares to the extreme flight?
They’re both excellent. Difficult to give any meaningful differentiations. I do like the SW servo quick connects.
"Billy Mays here"
How do you compare it to the EF 260
I’m struggling to decide on what to get
I like doing low harriers and just floating around lol
Wow. Tough call. They're both superb. For ME (for me), I like the Laser better, but you might have a different POV. Sure would be nice if we could rent them for a month wouldn't it?
@@RCVideoReviews sure would be 😅
I’m going to try the laser
Your reviews have great detail
And real time content 👌
LASSER IS AWSOME ....YOU GUYS ARE NEXT LEVEL PILOTS....COMMON FRED GOOD THING HES SUCH A GOOD PILOT ....
Thank you😎😁
How does the 67 feel compared to the 60? Is there a BIG difference or is it more marketing? Your skills are just a little bit better than mine. If I like doing a lot of 3-D, but still learning, would you recommend the laser or the extra 260? Enjoy your videos.
For the marginal difference in cost I'll take a 67" every time. If it's worth anything, I've sold all of my 60's and replaced them with 67's. The 67's handle wind a little better, they pair well with 6s 5000's, and are just a little easier to see at a distance. Both form factors are excellent though, you won't go wrong with either one.
Hope that helps...
@@RCVideoReviews
thanks! I have a EF 60 edge and gamebird. Probably will. do what you did. What are your three favorites in order?
Nice maidan flight John. Dave and Freddie are a good addition to the team. Keep up the good work,
Yes they are. Good guys. Lots of fun to fly with them.
Thank you🙂
Nice! Trying them all huh? I did that back in the early years of the 48'' and 60'' planes. I'm still waiting to maiden my Skywing 67 Laser 260. The weather sucks. My buddy just got the Laser too. I think I'll get a 67'' Extra 260 next. The best is still my 74'' 3DHS Edge and the 78'' EF Extra 300.
They all have different personalities. I'd love to fly every one.
For sure. Planes are addictive. Keep up the great videos.
@@RCVideoReviews
Ill be honest. Im so lazy, have MANY arf planes ready to be assembled but when i have time off would rather be flying than assembling. I think the price is quite good for what your getting.
I can totally empathize with you. I've realized over the years there are many facets of the hobby. One is building. One is flying. For some people the hobby is about building/modeling. It's never been that way for me. It's always been about the flying. The building was just a necessary hurdle in front of flying.
I also agree on the price. If you price everything independently, you should find a pretty close final $$ amount assuming you use good quality hardware in your spec.
@RCVideoReviews - what CG are you using? The wing tube or the 6 to 8mm behing the wing tube?
I start with the wing tube on these planes and adjust to suit based on in-flight characteristics.
I like big props, and I just can't lie! BG4L
HAHAH!
🤔🙄😵😄
How much flight time to you get on these please
Usually around 6-7m depending on how I fly.
Very nice airplane. Funny thing , I was not a big fan of the laser until I flew it, Within 3 or 4 minutes Flying it I realize just how good it really is. When we did the 60 inch, shoot out video The laser was my winner, my favorite, and the bigger they get the better they fly. By the way the 67 inch size is very interesting. That's probably Going to make a hole on the 60in size. Anyways the only thing better than a laser is too lasers 😁
Hmmmmm....two Lasers you say....
😁
Nice video and plane! 👍👍 How do you set up the screen seen on the TX16S at 11:35 that shows the various parameters and max values during flight?
ua-cam.com/video/5a-sNYZ-7uc/v-deo.html
Très belle démonstration
Merci pour le gentil commentaire.
trying to decide between the 67" Laser or Extra 260... thoughts ? I"m mostly an IMAC type of flyer... minimal 3D (not good enough)
Extra 260 then. The Laser is a little more flippy/floppy.
You might want to take a look at the Skywing 67" Extra NG.
Your post flight screen is still wrong as mentioned on Discord before :P You want TPWR+ for the highest transmit power seen and RQly- for the lowest quality seen. Quite easy to stay at 10mW this way :D
Good eye. That should have been tpwr+. Review of the log showed 2
Yeah, dunno how the hell that changed. ARS300 had the same screen setup, but all the other models (same template) have the right values. Weird.
That is one beautiful plane! Really does stand out in the sky- nice skills John!!
Thank you kindly Bill :)
NIIIIICE 👌🏻
The day I heard about the first EF 67" plane, my mind went to this airframe. Really happy they released this one.
Nice John. Flies great. Price is steep but then again it's all put to gether. Well almost. Very fantastic. John what receiver did you go with on this one?
I used a Radiomaster ER6 ELRS Rx. If you add up the components individually, I think you'll find the cost is close. Maybe a little extra for the labor to put it together, but I'm ok with that. Saves me time.
@@RCVideoReviewsI know right. I have problem making time putting an pnp together. Installing control horn, push rod all these little things add up. Not all have the time or patience to do so. Not only that but setting up servo to rx and get servo to be center to install servo horn it's time consumer. I have a disability of spinal the less work the better for me. The more time I can spend on flying pain free.
I hear you. I'd rather be flying too.
When the extra ng 67” will done
Great question!
Fred... 😂😅😊🎉
Right? He cracks me up.
I enjoyed the maiden but would you pls either find a steadier cameraman or make barf bags available to us patreons, LOL
Fred hasn't filmed in a while. I'm afraid he was a little rusty. We'll get him tuned up though, don't worry about that.
@@RCVideoReviewsOne of the handheld stabilization units would help.
We've tried all that. The camera gets heavy for them and they like to look through the viewfinder to track the plane. I even bought a big outdoor monitor but again--too heavy and hard to track.
@@RCVideoReviews Brian Phillips’ wife is probably the best rc plane videographer out there. Might inquire what equipment she uses to help improve your videos. Can’t imagine it will be ‘heavy’.
First lol
Fast!
@@RCVideoReviews What camera do you use on these flying vids? The plane stays in focus much better than any phone camera and I assume you have whatever the camera is, set for "infinity" with regard to focus? Another very enjoyable, (and humorous) flight review!!!!!