I stack the frames of the video in which I captured the cloaked spacecraft to see if the object will appear in the visible spectrum. Contact: jimlake24@gmail.com
They only apair in certain areas of the sky but l can pick them up Easyer now as that's l pick up on them but better when there's moon out to lm starting to think that there's some thing going on up there how can lines of things start appearing and disappearing in different parts of the sky and l looked up on my phone and stars in sky seem to be stars other people have said have disapaired cause that's what these stars do some times
Impressive that you used Registax and identified the exact stars in the star chart. Have you tried longer "exposures" (more frames)? Maybe just to see what (if any) dimmer objects might pop up in such areas of night sky (not necessarily competing with Hubble/Web!). Maybe you already appreciate, but with video frame stacking, there's no need for a motorised camera mount, the stacking app compensates for apparent star motion. And given how slowly the stars appear (to the camera) to move across per-frame, negligible star-streaking. The longer the exposure (so to speak) the more the sensor (etc.) thermal noise averages-out, so within Registax itself, or within an image-editing or processing app (e.g. GIMP) - provided the image is exported in a big depth (e.g. 16 bit TIFF) then you can _really_ whack-up the levels (of the stacking result-image). At 30 fps one hour = 30 x 3600 = 108K images, which if each image is a 1.6 MB PNG (as in your example) implies ~ 173 GB, not that big a deal nowadays, where even a 1 TB memory stick only costs ~ 10 ($ or £), or shirt-pocket "passport" drives" up to several TB. And these image files are only needed for temporary use. Then to process them, just let the computer churn overnight (or nights even). On Windows (last time I looked!) you can even drop the priority of processes - in this instance Registax - to "Low" (background-processing priority), while using the computer for other things, so those things don't become sluggish - then you could leave it churning as long as you like (e.g. weeks).
This is extremely cool and useful. Thank you.
They only apair in certain areas of the sky but l can pick them up Easyer now as that's l pick up on them but better when there's moon out to lm starting to think that there's some thing going on up there how can lines of things start appearing and disappearing in different parts of the sky and l looked up on my phone and stars in sky seem to be stars other people have said have disapaired cause that's what these stars do some times
It's happening at night right now over pahiatua in new Zealand regularly if U can get app or some thing that shows stars at night
Your content deserves more attention and definitely some answers.
Answers from our world leaders
Impressive that you used Registax and identified the exact stars in the star chart.
Have you tried longer "exposures" (more frames)? Maybe just to see what (if any) dimmer objects might pop up in such areas of night sky (not necessarily competing with Hubble/Web!).
Maybe you already appreciate, but with video frame stacking, there's no need for a motorised camera mount, the stacking app compensates for apparent star motion. And given how slowly the stars appear (to the camera) to move across per-frame, negligible star-streaking.
The longer the exposure (so to speak) the more the sensor (etc.) thermal noise averages-out, so within Registax itself, or within an image-editing or processing app (e.g. GIMP) - provided the image is exported in a big depth (e.g. 16 bit TIFF) then you can _really_ whack-up the levels (of the stacking result-image).
At 30 fps one hour = 30 x 3600 = 108K images, which if each image is a 1.6 MB PNG (as in your example) implies ~ 173 GB, not that big a deal nowadays, where even a 1 TB memory stick only costs ~ 10 ($ or £), or shirt-pocket "passport" drives" up to several TB. And these image files are only needed for temporary use. Then to process them, just let the computer churn overnight (or nights even).
On Windows (last time I looked!) you can even drop the priority of processes - in this instance Registax - to "Low" (background-processing priority), while using the computer for other things, so those things don't become sluggish - then you could leave it churning as long as you like (e.g. weeks).
@fyp
@whyfiles