I think the wiper's "defensiveness" might actually come down to his stubborn greed. He'll tend to greed strong economy when perhaps map control may be more important. Not first, but still on the podium
@@patrickyeh6101you can also shoot it twice with 7 villagers, but only if the luring villager shot the boar once. Also keep in mind Goths get bonus damage to boars (doesn't apply to TC fire).
@@AlamRigotti did huns have paladins in their army? Did Vikings use cannon galleons? Did mezoamerican civs use demolition ship? Did goths fight romans with handcannons? I see a lot of compromises to give specific civs advantage over other units, unfortunately it is not historically accurate. Poles were not given that kind of treatment and devs made from winged hussar some meat shield. They deserve to be at least gold cost unit with better stats.🙈
@@quaintserpent I know I know… I understand your point. But HC, demoliton etcetc… those are common unities. A regional unity to the wrong civ can break the thematic. For me, S Lancer or camels for poles is the same strange thing.
That's stupid, with that analogy, give eagle warriors to Spanish and battle elephants to Incas, steppe lancer is a regional unit, not at the same level as paladin or bombard canons because they're generic units, Huns needs steppe lancer, not poles
I love the sheer arrogance of refusing to just wall in the woodline during or after that 1st attack x)
This was part of the plan to hide the forward vils, dude!
4:14 "check Liquipedia, my man"
I think the wiper's "defensiveness" might actually come down to his stubborn greed. He'll tend to greed strong economy when perhaps map control may be more important. Not first, but still on the podium
Just like his woodline, it was unnecessary to leave it open A SECOND TIME.. Would have been so easy to put 3 house foundations down and have safe wood
@@Aieera yeah not even greed, just pure lazyness at this point. Viper used to be my favorite player now hes just frustrating to watch.
The Steppe Lancer rush from Mongols in Arabia is broken.
Dude. It really is. I've run into it like 1 in 3 games at 1500 - 1600 ELO and it's miserable.
10:53
(Former) Alcatraz world record holder btw 😂😂😂
Proof?
How many villagers in tc to shoot arrows to boar 2 times leaving it almost dead?
Idk just put all it should work, it’ll die first shot when you ungarrison anyway
6 vills shoot 2 time, or 4 vils shoot 3 times.
@@patrickyeh6101you can also shoot it twice with 7 villagers, but only if the luring villager shot the boar once.
Also keep in mind Goths get bonus damage to boars (doesn't apply to TC fire).
Esperando o F1re lançar o vídeo no canal dele, pra ver a visão dele...
Viper, witch country do u live in europe ?
Is this pG_f1re from AOM?
Those mounted kamauks..
Feroker, he's making well over 100k a year so just relax and enjoy.
Poor F1re :(
Yeet
👍👍👍
Disgusting unit the attack rating still too fast
Civ win mongols too strong in arabia
Poles need steppe lancers and winged hussar should be unique upgrade for them! 🙌🏻
Are Poles from the Stepes?
@@AlamRigotti did huns have paladins in their army? Did Vikings use cannon galleons? Did mezoamerican civs use demolition ship? Did goths fight romans with handcannons? I see a lot of compromises to give specific civs advantage over other units, unfortunately it is not historically accurate. Poles were not given that kind of treatment and devs made from winged hussar some meat shield. They deserve to be at least gold cost unit with better stats.🙈
@@quaintserpent I know I know… I understand your point. But HC, demoliton etcetc… those are common unities. A regional unity to the wrong civ can break the thematic. For me, S Lancer or camels for poles is the same strange thing.
That's stupid, with that analogy, give eagle warriors to Spanish and battle elephants to Incas, steppe lancer is a regional unit, not at the same level as paladin or bombard canons because they're generic units, Huns needs steppe lancer, not poles
@@sgtpepper8581 Huns could have the common Steppe Lancer with no upgrade, sure
Lancers let's go!!! Also first