Motorweek 2009 Dodge Journey Road Test

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 17

  • @FeartheCyr611
    @FeartheCyr611 Рік тому +1

    In 2014, I knew someone who had a 2011 Journey (refreshed) and I loved that car
    I still see this car out on the road today, and am reminded of that person

  • @sterlingstauffer2915
    @sterlingstauffer2915 Рік тому +6

    I’m really surprised the dodge journey body style was used so long. Over 10 years.

    • @damilolaakanni
      @damilolaakanni Рік тому +2

      It needed a redesign around 2014/2015. Car came out in 2009, was refreshed in 2011. Three years later and it should have been redesigned completely.

  • @chriscornelius2518
    @chriscornelius2518 Рік тому +8

    Its not the aesthetics, features, options, or the reputation. It is the lack of longevity and reliability for Chrysler brand

    • @damilolaakanni
      @damilolaakanni Рік тому +5

      They left it to linger on without a redesign, which was what Dodge did to pretty much every other car in their lineup. It only got a refresh in 2011 when it got the 3.6 to replace the 3.5 V6.

  • @ForgotToMentionThat
    @ForgotToMentionThat 2 місяці тому

    This car had so much potential.

  • @scottbuchele4814
    @scottbuchele4814 5 місяців тому

    Talks about the 4 cylinder, shows a Volvo engine😂

  • @jlcii
    @jlcii Рік тому +2

    Wow, I never realized how misogynistic the automotive world was for the longest time. I love how he implies that minivans were only found repulsive by fathers, insinuating that all mothers sincerely loved and wanted one. My Mom hated minivans, and you couldn't pay her to get one unless she absolutely have no choice. And this is while being a mom to five kids. For her, it was SUV or bust, and she wasn't the only mom that I knew of that had a strong disdain for the minivan. I take it the writers of the show didn't talk to many women when it came to what we actually like vehicle wise.

    • @ScarletKnightmare
      @ScarletKnightmare Рік тому +2

      😂

    • @joestuff8
      @joestuff8 Рік тому +3

      No. His insinuation falls into the idea that men always want something sporty or not practical. While women usually didn't care *most* of the time what automobile they drove. Point A to B.
      The crossover allowed a blend of both worlds. Men got a more "rugged, sporty, and visually more appealing vehicle.
      That's it. There are stats for a reason. Believe it or not, manufacturers *use* this to capitalize and profit.
      Not everything needs to be spun into some sort of issue. Unless you wanna go and *look* for it...

    • @ScarletKnightmare
      @ScarletKnightmare Рік тому

      @@joestuff8 You're arguing with a bot. Whether or not it's an actual bot or a human programmed into a bot doesn't actually matter. Once you realize these people's vote cancels yours and that Jacobins occupy the highest levels of power and institutions, you may find wisdom in preparing a first world zone for yourself in the rapidly approaching third world state they'll bring about. When they get what they want you will be relatively intact while unfortunately (?) they will not.

    • @ForgotToMentionThat
      @ForgotToMentionThat 2 місяці тому

      @@ScarletKnightmarewhat is the heck did you just say in all that text?!?

  • @jacobyo99
    @jacobyo99 Рік тому +4

    These are horrible cars but I have always liked those wheels

    • @jlcii
      @jlcii Рік тому +1

      The only reliable part of the car LOL

    • @sirot5561
      @sirot5561 11 місяців тому +1

      Totally agree! My coworker had one and the engine caught on fire 🔥😮

    • @MiggyCR
      @MiggyCR 8 місяців тому +1

      It’s always been an attractive car to me, but the drivetrain was absolutely terrible.