2024 Annual Supreme Court Review
Вставка
- Опубліковано 9 лип 2024
- Distinguished legal scholars and Supreme Court analysts Erwin Chemerinsky, Miguel Estrada, Mary Anne Franks, Gregory G. Garre, and Frederick Lawrence will discuss, in a conversation moderated by journalist Amy Howe, the important cases of the term including social media moderation, deference to administrative agencies, reproductive rights, and presidential criminal liability. They will also discuss what to expect at the Supreme Court next year.
This program is in partnership with ADL.
Register for upcoming programs: constitutioncenter.org/news-d...
Visit our media library to discover more online classes, podcasts, and Town Hall conversations: constitutioncenter.org/news-d...
Subscribe to the National Constitution Center on UA-cam: ua-cam.com/users/Constitu...
Follow the National Constitution Center on social media!
Facebook: / constitutionctr
Twitter: / constitutionctr
Instagram: / constitutionctr
Sign up for our newsletter: visitor.r20.constantcontact.c...
Excellent!
I want to know if these guys agreed on any of the cases. Especially, the immunity case
We have a twisted view of the Supreme Court today, the problem we have is the Supreme Court making decisions on these types of constitution interpretation questions, which constitutes amending the constitution by interpretation, and the Constitution of the United States may only be amended, including amendment by interpretation, according to Article 5 of the Constitution of the United States, meaning only the States as the Union can amend or interpret their Constitution.
Let’s remember what a constitution is; “to constitute” means to form or assemble, and the only thing formed and assembled by the Constitution of the United States is congress as a legislative assembly of the States governed by legislative processes to reach a majority consensus of all the States as the Union and Established Government Authority. Therefore the Constitution of the United States, the document, is the Blueprints and Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) to assemble and operate congress as a legislative assembly, and the Constitution of the united States, in congress assembled, is the Union of the States assembled in Congress, which is empowered as the Established Government Authority.
The Supreme Court may only hear and decide a very narrow category of matters in question which relate to conflicts and disputes between the States and petitions for redress of grievances when laws which are properly made by a properly assembled and operated legislature disproportionately affect or disenfranchise a State or States, and all these decisions are final and the States have already agreed to abide by these decisions, which is why the States must always participate in assembling the Supreme Court, and why every State must have at least 1 judge in the pool of justices which can be chosen to hear and decide any matter in question.
The States as they are assembled in the Senate are responsible for establishing the Supreme and Inferior Courts, which includes the process for creating the pool of justices and the initial assembly of the Court, appointments for vacancies which occur in that pool of judges is a separate process, where the President must make a list of qualified and suitable candidates for the States as they are assembled in the Senate to consider, a number of nominees and the required qualifications each nominee must possess as determined through the “advice” of the States as they are assembled in the Senate, for the States to determine their choice by vote, 1 vote per State, and a majority of All the States is necessary to the Choice, once the choice is made that person is appointed to fill the vacancy in the pool.
This process of “Consensus Choice” is also used to fill vacancies as they occur in the executive departments, and it is used to choose the President and Vice President of the United States, as well as all Senators in the Federal Senate. This is a two phase process where one assembly identifies and vets the candidates that a second assembly must consider to determine a choice by vote, 1 vote per Member, a State or a county of a State, and a Majority of All the Members is necessary to the Choice.
In government you get what you assemble, we have divided, partisan,dysfunctional government because we assemble divided, partisan, dysfunctional government. Maybe it’s time to review The Constitution of the United States unamended to restore the balance and equality to our system and end the unconstitutional party governing era.
Article. III. Section. 1.
The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court,...Section. 2. The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority; ..... In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.
@@candidlens
Who are responsible for establishing the Supreme and Inferior Courts and what does that entail? What constitutes a Federal Law? And how does the Supreme Court Function, and is how it functions a part of establishing the courts?
I can see that you can copy good, even though you left out some pertinent information, but what is the point;t you are trying to make?
@@nfpnone8248 No one is responsible for establishing the Supreme Court. It was established when the Constitution was ratified in 1788.
Congress _may_ establish inferior courts from time to time. To "establish" a court is to bring it into existence. It is allowed to do this, but it doesn't have to.
Congress is given some authority to regulate the Supreme Court's appellate jurisdiction by Article III Section 2.. The parameters of its appellate jurisdiction are indicated there.
A federal law is any legislation passed by Congress in accord with the requirements of passing a law as set forth in Article I. Any law it passes in accord with these requirements becomes a federal law.
How the Supreme Court functions would require some explaining.