Recuerdo haber visto este partido en vivo en el mejor momento del feña. La verdad jugaba muy bien para mí es el mejor tenista de la historia en Chile. Crecí viendo jugar al feña y como cada día subía su nivel. Jugo entre los más grandes de la historia y a mi por lo menos me hizo sentir orgulloso cuando jugó e incluso les ganó a los grandes de la historia del tenis. Grande Feña.
At 2:17:30 who ever was commentating stated that Gonzalez got lucky with 2 aces.....I am very confused by his statement..... then Gonzales pops up another ace just as he said that, no comments came out of his mouth.....I wonder who picks these guys to comment, and I hope it wasn't Mat.
It's hard to see it, those forehands fly like a rocket, noone's ever hit the ball close to his power. Best forehand ever in history of tennis for sure!
@@edu7_17 Thiem campeon de Grand Slam Victorias sobre Federer, Djokovic y Nadal con un Frente frente parejo. Thiem es un jugador mucho mas completo de lo que fué Gonzalez. No hay comparacion. El que no sabe nada es usted amigo. Vea estadisticas e historiales Gonzalez jamás logró ni lograría , lo que Thiem ha hecho. No discutas estupideces ignorante e informate!!!
Increible! Recuerdo haber visto este partidazo. Una lástima que el challenge haya sido el peor enemigo de Gonzalez en el último set. Tenía todo para hacerle el partido a Roddick
01:38:05 Que globo más increible y con spin. Yo creo que Gonzalez huviera ganado, tenia de todo para ganarle a Rodick, serbicio, derecha, devoluciones ect. Hay un partido en el que un jugador juega similar a Gonzalez y le gana, puros passing, derechas ect ua-cam.com/video/dQMHPP6yn0s/v-deo.htmlsi=-JsmCOaqiG4wShL4
Esto le a pasado muchas veces empieza a jugar con su slais y le sigue dando y no aprovecha de serrar los puntos y eso termina pasandole la cuenta nunca aprendió que el punto se juega a muerte y el peco de ingenio muchas veces pero fue un buen partido Feña gracias por lo que le diste al tenis nacional gracias hermano 💪💪💪🇨🇱🇨🇱🇨🇱🇨🇱🇨🇱🇨🇱🇨🇱🇨🇱🇨🇱🇨🇱🇨🇱🇨🇱🇨🇱🇨🇱
Parece que no sabe mucho de tenis. Fernando con el tiempo aprendió que tenía que dosificar para no sacrificar su brazo, sobre todo cuando son partidos largos. Cuando se acercaba el momento le daba fuerte con el revés para ganar el punto. Viste la cantidad de winners que hizo con el revés??.
2:23:20 Commentator is wrong there. Clearly Roddick’s point. Gonzo didn’t play the ball and the call wasn’t made until after the ball passed him, so the call did not affect his decision to not play that ball.
Interesting enough i remember exact same čase happened to Roddick vs Kohlschreiber in 08' and he wanted to strangle the ref Wonder why Andy wasnt complaining this time he took the decision joyfully🤔😅
@@glutamin111 Hawkeye was still fairly new at the time of that match so the rules might not have been that well understood by the players. Fast forward to this match 2 years later Roddick probably understood the rules better
@@ognjenjasic611 yes I've been a fan of Gonzo since 2000 but... the point was Roddick's. There isn't any question - terrible commentary. Fernando clearly gave up on the ball before the audible out call.
Si se dan cuenta, en un momento los comentadores ingleses y/o estado unidenses, les ardió el maldito ano cuando gonzalez ganaba cada punto lol. best forehand always. thats all. y Viva España y Rafa Nadal!!!
@@victoracevedo8384 @victor acevedo el juez interpretó que esa pelota era un winner, es decir, que aunque González haya tratado de devolverla no lo iba a poder hacer por la fuerza que llevaba la pelota, por lo que le dio el punto a Roddick. González alega que él no la devolvió sólo por el hecho de que el juez de línea cantó out, porque para él no era un winner de roddick y era perfectamente devolucionable. Lo más gracioso de esto, es que González le dice: "a la velocidad weon, va super fuerte la wea" ironizando de que esa pelota no era ni rápida ni fuerte para ser un winner, además de lo cerca que estaba del Feña, lo justamente gracioso es que González tiene toda la autoridad del mundo para ironizar con eso aksj, ya que, es por lejos la mejor derecha de la historia de la era abierta.
great match but the announcing was awful and how the hell did no one tell one of those stupid commentators to stop tapping his fingers on the microphone jesus christ what an amateur
The worst commentators ever. Roddick here, Roddick there....I think whoever was commentating had no clue on how to do the job.....They were in love with the guy wow, I can't believe the favoritism in the sport....and the game was stolen from the Chilean. The point should have been replayed.
LOL....you don't know the regulations obviously. Fernando gave up on the ball and didn't play the point. Once you do that...it's over. Exactly as if Fernando had done the same and the out call wasn't made. Fernando thought it was going to be out and he made a mistake. In pro tennis, always play the ball if you can. If you are sure it was an error, then you can stop right after playing the shot and ask for a replay.....if the other guy asks for a replay and you didn't play it - you're out of luck if it was good. The ONLY chance for Gonzo to appeal that is if the audible "out" call stopped him from playing it eg. "I didn't play it BECAUSE the linesman called it out and that's why I stopped" - but that wasn't the case here (and rarely is), the linesman's audible call comes well after Fernando had let it go.
Andy Roddick, what a wasted talent. With all the weapons he had, one of the biggest serves in the game, biggest forehands my oh my. Should have won at LEAST 7 or 8 Grand Slams but only managed 1. ANOTHER American player who wanted to be famous for off the court stuff more than the tennis itself. Could have been one of the real greats but choose Hollywood famous over it
Part of Roddick's decline was that he changed his FH. During his years with Brad Gilbert in 03 and 04, he hit a flat FH which complimented his big serve. After he fired Gilbert, his new coach worked to change his FH grip so that he could generate more spin. It didn't work well, and he wound up having a weak spinny FH for the rest of his career, and it allowed other opponents to dictate play against him. They no longer needed to worry about his power from the back of the court. It made the match-up that much easier for Federer.
A theft. As usual. And Roddick was such an overrated player. got lucky with one major just because he wasn't known and the others were playing old style. Never won anything anymore. But he keeps talking to this day.
I miss Gonzo. He was never the same after this match.
Recuerdo haber visto este partido en vivo en el mejor momento del feña. La verdad jugaba muy bien para mí es el mejor tenista de la historia en Chile. Crecí viendo jugar al feña y como cada día subía su nivel. Jugo entre los más grandes de la historia y a mi por lo menos me hizo sentir orgulloso cuando jugó e incluso les ganó a los grandes de la historia del tenis. Grande Feña.
Ponía en alto a Latinoamérica con su estilo tan potente y magistral que asustaba a jugadores de élite
ya no era su mejor momento ni de cerca, su mejor momento fue AO 2007
@@clauwasaki4548confirmo, 2007 era un killer
El mejor tenista de la historia en Chile???? El Chino Ríos es el mejor de Chile
Quizá Ríos fue mejor pero Feña tenía la mejor derecha de todos los tiempos y un revés de respeto. Además de ser un caballero a comparación de Ríos
So good. Thanks for the upload
2:30:38 That's a LEGIT racquet smash.
What a great match between Andy and Fernando! 😍
Amazing match
At 2:17:30 who ever was commentating stated that Gonzalez got lucky with 2 aces.....I am very confused by his statement..... then Gonzales pops up another ace just as he said that, no comments came out of his mouth.....I wonder who picks these guys to comment, and I hope it wasn't Mat.
The Hammer vs The Bullet
un crack gonzalez
Great match!
It's hard to see it, those forehands fly like a rocket, noone's ever hit the ball close to his power. Best forehand ever in history of tennis for sure!
Good call not to replay the point at the end of set 4. Call came after Gonzalez left the ball. 2:22:45
Would've loved to watch Thiem vs Gonzalez :D
Me toooo
Thiem lo destruye facilmente en 2 set corridos
@@juanpabloalvaradobadillo5059 usted no sabe lo que habla
@@edu7_17
Thiem campeon de Grand Slam
Victorias sobre Federer, Djokovic y Nadal con un Frente frente parejo.
Thiem es un jugador mucho mas completo de lo que fué Gonzalez.
No hay comparacion.
El que no sabe nada es usted amigo.
Vea estadisticas e historiales
Gonzalez jamás logró ni lograría , lo que Thiem ha hecho.
No discutas estupideces ignorante e informate!!!
@@juanpabloalvaradobadillo5059 Gonzalez easily destroys shithiem
Fernando!!👊💥💥
Increible! Recuerdo haber visto este partidazo. Una lástima que el challenge haya sido el peor enemigo de Gonzalez en el último set. Tenía todo para hacerle el partido a Roddick
Great hustle by ArOd
01:38:05 Que globo más increible y con spin.
Yo creo que Gonzalez huviera ganado, tenia de todo para ganarle a Rodick, serbicio, derecha, devoluciones ect.
Hay un partido en el que un jugador juega similar a Gonzalez y le gana, puros passing, derechas ect
ua-cam.com/video/dQMHPP6yn0s/v-deo.htmlsi=-JsmCOaqiG4wShL4
33:43 weon weon
Esto le a pasado muchas veces empieza a jugar con su slais y le sigue dando y no aprovecha de serrar los puntos y eso termina pasandole la cuenta nunca aprendió que el punto se juega a muerte y el peco de ingenio muchas veces pero fue un buen partido Feña gracias por lo que le diste al tenis nacional gracias hermano 💪💪💪🇨🇱🇨🇱🇨🇱🇨🇱🇨🇱🇨🇱🇨🇱🇨🇱🇨🇱🇨🇱🇨🇱🇨🇱🇨🇱🇨🇱
Parece que no sabe mucho de tenis. Fernando con el tiempo aprendió que tenía que dosificar para no sacrificar su brazo, sobre todo cuando son partidos largos. Cuando se acercaba el momento le daba fuerte con el revés para ganar el punto. Viste la cantidad de winners que hizo con el revés??.
👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
que partidazo
Si pero que mal comentado !!!! parece que los pendejos estaban enamorados del Rodick.
2:23:20 Commentator is wrong there. Clearly Roddick’s point. Gonzo didn’t play the ball and the call wasn’t made until after the ball passed him, so the call did not affect his decision to not play that ball.
even as a Gonzalez fan have to agree...
Interesting enough i remember exact same čase happened to Roddick vs Kohlschreiber in 08' and he wanted to strangle the ref
Wonder why Andy wasnt complaining this time he took the decision joyfully🤔😅
@@glutamin111 Hawkeye was still fairly new at the time of that match so the rules might not have been that well understood by the players. Fast forward to this match 2 years later Roddick probably understood the rules better
@@ErikCB912 Roddick himself suffered from the same rule plenty of times and showed much anger.
@@ognjenjasic611 yes I've been a fan of Gonzo since 2000 but... the point was Roddick's. There isn't any question - terrible commentary. Fernando clearly gave up on the ball before the audible out call.
I miss Babolat :(
El arbitraje siempre ayudando a roddick
1:39:40
Treu !
Si se dan cuenta, en un momento los comentadores ingleses y/o estado unidenses, les ardió el maldito ano cuando gonzalez ganaba cada punto lol. best forehand always. thats all. y Viva España y Rafa Nadal!!!
danieliita enamorada
Como va a ser un winner esa wea González estaba al lado
2:22:46
main commentator knows nothing about tennis... Totally annoying... :(
incredible how they stole the 4th set from Gonzalez
ese 7-5 ni cagando se lo daban si era a favor de gonzalez
Nunca he entendido por qué roddick ganó ese punto?, No sé debía repetir el punto?
@@victoracevedo8384 @victor acevedo el juez interpretó que esa pelota era un winner, es decir, que aunque González haya tratado de devolverla no lo iba a poder hacer por la fuerza que llevaba la pelota, por lo que le dio el punto a Roddick. González alega que él no la devolvió sólo por el hecho de que el juez de línea cantó out, porque para él no era un winner de roddick y era perfectamente devolucionable. Lo más gracioso de esto, es que González le dice: "a la velocidad weon, va super fuerte la wea" ironizando de que esa pelota no era ni rápida ni fuerte para ser un winner, además de lo cerca que estaba del Feña, lo justamente gracioso es que González tiene toda la autoridad del mundo para ironizar con eso aksj, ya que, es por lejos la mejor derecha de la historia de la era abierta.
@@bvstrd debió haber dejado la cagá en ese momento, parar el partido y llamar al supervisor
great match but the announcing was awful and how the hell did no one tell one of those stupid commentators to stop tapping his fingers on the microphone jesus christ what an amateur
=
Serve bot vs Forehand bot
Who is that mediocre umpire? He is in the history of tennis too
Le robaron el partido
2013 Djokovic vs wawrinka was a better 4th round match
These commentators talk too much !😮
2:37:52
The worst commentators ever. Roddick here, Roddick there....I think whoever was commentating had no clue on how to do the job.....They were in love with the guy wow, I can't believe the favoritism in the sport....and the game was stolen from the Chilean. The point should have been replayed.
LOL....you don't know the regulations obviously. Fernando gave up on the ball and didn't play the point. Once you do that...it's over. Exactly as if Fernando had done the same and the out call wasn't made. Fernando thought it was going to be out and he made a mistake. In pro tennis, always play the ball if you can. If you are sure it was an error, then you can stop right after playing the shot and ask for a replay.....if the other guy asks for a replay and you didn't play it - you're out of luck if it was good. The ONLY chance for Gonzo to appeal that is if the audible "out" call stopped him from playing it eg. "I didn't play it BECAUSE the linesman called it out and that's why I stopped" - but that wasn't the case here (and rarely is), the linesman's audible call comes well after Fernando had let it go.
Andy Roddick, what a wasted talent. With all the weapons he had, one of the biggest serves in the game, biggest forehands my oh my. Should have won at LEAST 7 or 8 Grand Slams but only managed 1. ANOTHER American player who wanted to be famous for off the court stuff more than the tennis itself. Could have been one of the real greats but choose Hollywood famous over it
Not accurate at all. The reason he didn’t win more is simple: Roger Federer. He was just simply no match against Roger.
Part of Roddick's decline was that he changed his FH. During his years with Brad Gilbert in 03 and 04, he hit a flat FH which complimented his big serve. After he fired Gilbert, his new coach worked to change his FH grip so that he could generate more spin. It didn't work well, and he wound up having a weak spinny FH for the rest of his career, and it allowed other opponents to dictate play against him. They no longer needed to worry about his power from the back of the court. It made the match-up that much easier for Federer.
Que robo en el 4 set
A theft. As usual. And Roddick was such an overrated player. got lucky with one major just because he wasn't known and the others were playing old style. Never won anything anymore. But he keeps talking to this day.