It is so necessary for all believing Muslims to arm themselves with this knowledge that was shared between these very informed gentlemen. Some Muslims do not take the time to read up this knowledge and sometimes it is even hard to come by. So listening to your shows is another way of gaining very valuable knowledge. Thank you brothers Paul and Justin.
There is no slavery in Islam- only prisoners. There is no ransom in Islam- only bail. One thousand four hundred and fifty years ago, when Islam came on the scene, it nullified and negated the concept of slavery. No ruler or progenitor was allowed to treat his subjects or offspring as his slaves. Every individual was bestowed with well-defined rights; the ruler and the ruled, the progenitor and the offspring had to live within the limits prescribed by religion; no one could transgress those limits. Islam was the first religion to name every man and woman equal in the sight of God. Everyone was born free. There was no slavery system in Islam until pagans started taking Muslims as slaves- those Muslims who were not protected by powerful tribes were captured and sold to enemies who killed, tortured and persecuted them mercilessly.
islamic writers or scholars claim that these non muslim women prisoners of war were distributed among the muslim soldiers for their safety or to save their lives or to provide for their sustenance. so it is humanity. but their claim is completely false and unreasonable. because if you see those authentic hadiths, you will understand that they avoid the main points by making tricks. reasons firstly, Azl (birth control method) is applied to these women according to the hadith, so that they can not become mothers of children. because if the child is born, she can not be sold or ransomed by returning her to her family. at the same time, companions used to have intercourse with them and perform Azl (birth control). So that they can be sold to another person or to their family to collect ransom after used. what kind of morality it of religion. i tried to explain the hadiths in brief. secondly, if it is for the safety of women prisoners of war then why are they separated from their husbands after being captured. according to shafi'i and maliki law their marriage will be dissolved. because it is in authentic hadith. (very clear here for the purpose of distinction). opinion first of all, now think if someone wants to capture your sister and release her with a ransom. secondly dy doing azl(birth control) if sold to another person after intercourse. thus she is repeatedly sold to different men (after the end of a certain period). now think how much the repeated selling can add to the emotional pain of a woman. physical pain is more terrible. thirdly, her right to be a mother has been destroyed by(azl) birth control. If that seems fair to you. then there is nothing more to say. injustice has been done here...with these hadiths later the Imams of for school(Madhhab)made laws..as a result of which this tyranny continues till the ottoman period. allah is fully responsible for this. allah could have provided them with permanent security during the time of the companions if he willed.
@@MichaelMalzahn-s9g The term concubine is not exist in the Qur'an.The term in the Qur'an in arabic"ma meleket eyman" mostly translating in the meaning "concubine" in english. But it is not true translation. ıts word for word translation is;"the person(female) who has got your words(oaths)" It means;The person you employ for a certain fee or commitment.
'I'm not saying muslims lived up to that ideal. In history we know they didn't' Subhanallah, a great reminder to remain humble and strive toward goodness. Thank you for the wonderful content.
Great! Thank you. At the time ISIS was torturing the Yazidis in the name of God I asked I discussed the matter of slavery with a "Muslim". He told me that In Islam a slave was a master's due. He could do whatever he wished. I could not believe my ears and stopped the conversation. May Allah open the heart of such people to true Islam!
First of all, there is no evidence that they were being tortured (CNN, BBC or any other kafir sources do not count). Secondly, the basic rule in legal rulings is that everything is halal unless proven otherwise. Not the other way around where I have to search up evidence for it being halal. In fact, there's a well-known Hadith that says something like "do not hit you wife in a manner that you would hit your slave". Also, why would u refer to the person u discussed with as a Muslim in parentheses? Are u takfiring them just for making such a statement? May Allah truly guide us aameen.
@@fmohammed23 "do not hit you wife in a manner that you would hit your slave" are you saying it's ok to hit ur slave? I'm gonna give you the benefit of the doubt as every muslim should and say you didn't mean it that way but u certainly did make it look like that by only nitpicking that hadith out of context and ignoring all of the verses in the quran about husna and compassion the no harm principles in islam may Allah guide us both
Salam alaykoum, What an important topic ! Christians missionaries and atheists are using this topic in order to try to get Muslim women to leave Islam. May Allah reward y'all !
This channel is a feast for Truth-seekers. Wonderful interviews with men of true scholarship. I sincerely hope he would interview more traditional scholars such as Belal Assad, Muhammad Tim Humble, Ustadh Abulrahman Hassan, Ali Hammuda et al.
It can get morbid when you learn how slavery and kinslaying and harems with 3000 women were normal, but we have to remember that Islam is a belief, and doesn't hinge on Sultans or Kings or whatever
But having appointed caliph that represent Islamic Ummah is a bare minimal for Muslims. This has been a majority view of scholars. Why? Because their marks as the establishment of Islam on the earth. Which was the essence of prophethood.
I'm from Phillipines and I'm inspired by the effort and research of our brothers reverts who are more doing efforts to enlighten humanity thank you all brothers may Allah reward you the highest ranks in paradise
@@shamsheerg7519because he said “free the slaves and god will free you from the fire “ instead. Slavery was primarily a universal economic institution and its no coincidence that abolishing it became possible only with the onset of industrialization where machine labour replaced human labour. Before that the most ethical thing you could do to address it was emancipation, not abolishment. It is estimated that the prophet and his household were responsible for the emancipation of some 35,000 slaves alone. Dirty Indian
Asalamu alaykum Brother Paul and fellow viewers. Please consider the following: the Quran says: وَمَن لَّمْ يَسْتَطِعْ مِنكُمْ طَوْلًا أَن يَنكِحَ الْمُحْصَنَاتِ الْمُؤْمِنَاتِ فَمِن مَّا مَلَكَتْ أَيْمَانُكُم مِّن فَتَيَاتِكُمُ الْمُؤْمِنَاتِ ۚ وَاللَّهُ أَعْلَمُ بِإِيمَانِكُم ۚ بَعْضُكُم مِّن بَعْضٍ ۚ فَانكِحُوهُنَّ بِإِذْنِ أَهْلِهِنَّ وَآتُوهُنَّ أُجُورَهُنَّ بِالْمَعْرُوفِ مُحْصَنَاتٍ غَيْرَ مُسَافِحَاتٍ وَلَا مُتَّخِذَاتِ أَخْدَانٍ ۚ فَإِذَا أُحْصِنَّ فَإِنْ أَتَيْنَ بِفَاحِشَةٍ فَعَلَيْهِنَّ نِصْفُ مَا عَلَى الْمُحْصَنَاتِ مِنَ الْعَذَابِ And whoever among you cannot find the means to marry free, believing women, then he may marry from those whom your right hands possess of believing maids/servants. And Allah is most knowing about your faith. You believers are of one another. So marry them with the permission of their people and give them their due payment according to what is acceptable ……. [Nisa ayah 25] So the Quran stipulates that the woman from one's right hand needs to be: 1. A believing servant (مِّن فَتَيَاتِكُمُ الْمُؤْمِنَاتِ) 2. Is to be married (فَانكِحُوهُنَّ) 3. Her family/people/tribe need to be informed of the marriage (بِإِذْنِ أَهْلِهِنّ) 4. A dowry payment is to be given according to what is acceptable (وَآتُوهُنَّ أُجُورَهُنَّ بِالْمَعْرُوفِ) How did the Prophet SAW marry Safia RA and Juwayriyah RA, who were captives of war following a war between the Muslims and their tribe? The most reliable accounts states that Safia RA became a Muslim and the Prophet freed her and married her with the knowledge of her tribe. Safia RA had great love of the Prophet and became a devout Muslima. In the case of Juwayriyah, she accepted to marry the Prophet and also became a believer. Following her marriage and conversion all her tribe were freed. The practice of engaging in sexual relations with a slave without a marriage contract is NOT mentioned in the Quran nor is buying and selling slaves, other than when Yusuf AS was sold into slavery ( a practice of ancient times that Muslims unfortunately inherited).
This makes a lot more sense then allowing unrestricted relations with female captives. The Quran is definitely anti-slavery and offers the best guidance Alhumdu Lillah !!!
This is incorrect. One doesn’t need to marry his slave in order to have intercourse with them. This s clearly established in the Quran and in the Sunnah. If one wants to marry a slave, first the slave must be freed and then the marriage contract can be done. *A wife can't be a slave* . Also, *no muslim can be taken as a slave* . If they accept Islam, that doesn't mean they are free, but the Prophet ﷺ didn't wage war on other Muslims since *they were the main group of Muslims* besides the Sahaba the Prophet ﷺ sent to do Dawah. It seems like you missed these verses and ahadith: وَٱلَّذِينَ هُمْ لِفُرُوجِهِمْ حَـٰفِظُونَ [٧٠:٢٩] 29) And those who guard their chastity (i.e. private parts from illegal sexual acts). إِلَّا عَلَىٰٓ أَزْوَٰجِهِمْ أَوْ مَا مَلَكَتْ أَيْمَـٰنُهُمْ فَإِنَّهُمْ غَيْرُ مَلُومِينَ [٧٠:٣٠] 30) Except with their wives and the (women slaves and captives) whom their right hands possess, for (then) they are not to be blamed," The Sahaba used to have intercourse with new captives after battle. They were not Muslim, they were the enemy and as stated, free muslims can't be taken as slaves nor fought unless in certain conditions. Here is a good hadith: sunnah.com/urn/512590 Abu Said al-Khudri said, 'We went out with the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, on the expedition to the Banu al-Mustaliq. *We took some Arabs prisoner, and we desired the women as celibacy was hard for us. We wanted the ransom, so we wanted to practise coitus interruptus* . We said, 'Shall we practise coitus interruptus while the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, is among us before we ask him?' We asked him about that and he said, 'You don't have to not do it. There is no self which is to come into existence up to the Day of Rising but that it will come into existence.' "
@@mohamudahmed6554 So brother are basing the practice of the Sahaba ( fallible humans), BEFORE surat Al Nisa was revealed and before the completion of the religion, as your evidence over the Quran and authentic Sunna ? Allah SWT says to obey Allah and his Messenger and the Messenger married all his wives without exception and gave a dowry other than those who offered themselves to the be married by the Prophet ( with no dowry) as per Surat Al Ahzab ayah 50: ".....and a believing woman if she offers herself to the Prophet, if the Prophet wishes to marry her, that is only for you, excluding the believers." Also the hadith you quoted is one small part of the story. Banu Mustaliq were captured by Sahaba BUT Prophet SAW married Juwayirah and freed all her tribesman. What they wanted to do was not what happened and they freed all of the woman. Also final point, right hand possession is not a free right to have relations. The Quran says that woman also have right hand possession. It means to work as a servant for a period of time until they are released. I hope that is clear brother.
I'm from Bosnia. In spite of 400 years of Ottoman rule, we never had slavery in any form. Thanks Paul and Justin for making this video. Justin, you should make a book out of this paper.
Paul your's 1+1+1 video idea is great. As a regular consumer of your content, it becomes difficult to keep up with higher number of big interviews per week. One main interview per week is great 👍
Thanks for the video guys- I have been on the fence on converting as I am looking for peace but this topic alone has been holding me back. I’m still a little weary but appreciate this work done
salaams Jimmy. I am no scholar but have recently been reading and thinking of this and just wanted to offer some advise in case I may get some reward from Allah. Unfortunately when the prophet hits the ground 1400 years ago, slavery is rampant in the society (worldwide actually) along with other major problems like alcohol. Getting rid of slavery and alcohol occured in stepwise fashion. If you try to ban such things over night without convincing people of the reasonings, you drive those practises further into darkness where it occurs with even less regulation as we saw with prohibition in the USA which led to alcohol that blinded people due to inability to find correct ingredients. If slavery had been banned in one night we would've had human trafficking and people doing more to hide their slaves. How would you get rid of it? The muslim approach is to slow down getting new slaves,such as conquering towns and turning everyone into slaves being prohibited, and incentivizing freeing slaves. For example if you break an oath, you have to free a slave. If you have sex while fasting, you have to free a slave. Many sins require freeing a slave. Also it is important that if slavery exists in a society running islamic law, there should be rules for it. America had no rules so slaves had no rights. America had no problem going to Africa and turning people into slaves for no reason, but that is not allowed. Eventually even the prophet's wife Aisha said it was difficult to find a slave to free! Anywhere that islam is practised eventually you will dry up the slave class. Today human trafficking for sex and sweat shops in China are modern slavery and there is no way out and no rights. In islam a slave had to eat from your food and dress from your clothes and they could make a contract with their owner to buy their freedom. Unfortunately enslaving people is something humans do and it is better to have to rules than not to limit suffering. I hope this helps.
@@free_palestine786 but sex slavery, no human rights for lgbt and polygamy disturbd my heart. And yes position of women too If it hurts your heart so much, i can suggest islamic channels who can bring you peace of mind if you have the courage to question them on their live stream. And what human rights has been denied to the lgbt community, when did sodomy become a human right, you would not be here if your parents practised sodomy. The existence of the community is based on people who did not practice sodomy. i am sure you love animals too, when is the wedding mate or would you deny them their rights.
@@BloggingTheology Alot of Non-Muslims especially Christians and Atheists say that in Islam if a woman is raped and there are No 4 witnesses then the Rapist will go Scot free and the women will be punished,some of them have a misunderstanding about the difference between the Punishment of Death which requires 4 witnesses and the difference between any other Punishment in which the 4 witnesses are NOT required, suppose like 10 years prison etc,even alot of Muslims don't know this and they get trapped easily by this from Non-Muslims......If there are circumstantial evidences and in addition medical evidence then the Qadi Judge can give anyother punishment to the Rapist except the Death Penalty,and the woman will go free because she's innocent and was a victim,now read the evidence for this from the great Scholars of Islam and Hadiths,Imam Malik (may Allah have mercy on him) said: “In our view the man who rapes a woman, whether she is a virgin or not, if she is a free woman he must pay a “dowry” like that of her peers, and if she is a slave he must pay whatever has been detracted from her value. The punishment is to be carried out on the rapist and there is no punishment for the woman who has been raped, whatever the case.” (Al-Muwatta, 2/734) Ibn ‘Abd al-Barr (may Allah have mercy on him) said: “The scholars are unanimously agreed that the rapist is to be subjected to the hadd punishment if there is clear evidence against him that he deserves the hadd punishment, or if he admits to that. Otherwise, he is to be punished (i.e., if there is no proof that the hadd punishment for zina may be carried out against him because he does not confess, and there are not four witnesses, then the judge may punish him and stipulate a punishment that will deter him and others like him). There is no punishment for the woman if it is true that he forced her and overpowered her, which may be proven by her screaming and shouting for help.” (Al-Istidhkaar, 7/146)
Salaam brother Paul, I've been hooked on your videos. Thank you soo much for sharing your knowledge and discussions with us, I feel so inspired by these discussions I now want to be a scholar 🙂
Brother Paul you're a blessing I was just thinking about this topic and didn't want to dig too much fearing I'd find false information. I'm so thankful for you may Allah reward you for all your work.💜
God allowed Muslims to take captives only in wars-and that too under complex rules which included that prisoners of war must be treated gently, and must be fed the same foods his captors ate, must be clothed in the same fabric, and lodged in a similar housing. And it drastically restricted war, by allowing enslavement only in a war fought against unbelieving and unjust enemy. In no other way could anyone be enslaved. At the same time, Islam raised the status of slavery to that of a free man; and opened many ways for their emancipation. In Islam, no one was permitted to have sexual relations with their slaves. However, in countries throughout Europe, North America and Australia, it was a commonplace occurrence and also sanctioned by government laws to sexually assault their slaves, especially the women, which was practiced in a mass scale and completely legal until a few decades ago.
@@jennydbeme it is said that Maria the Coptic was a concubine of the Christian king of Alexandria in Egypt, and was sent among other gifts to Prophet Muhammad pbuh, as a reply to Prophet Muhammad's pbuh letter calling the king to Islam. Prophet Muhammad put her among the status of his wives, she beared for him his son Ibrahim who died around the age of two, prophet Muhammad was heartbroken but practiced patience for the sake of Allah!!! He treated Mariah so dearly that some of his wives were said to be jealous of, anyway Allah knows best, and we have to follow the example of our prophet in any situation that others might not agree with, as we should never say that we know or could be more passionate or just than Allah and the prophet!!!
@@Faith-in-the-One please explain this hadith to me: Narrated Ibn Muhairiz: I saw Abu Said and asked him about coitus interruptus. Abu Said said, "We went with Allah's Apostle, in the Ghazwa of Barli Al-Mustaliq and we captured some of the 'Arabs as captives, and the long separation from our wives was pressing us hard and we wanted to practice coitus interruptus. We asked Allah's Apostle (whether it was permissible). He said, "It is better for you not to do so. No soul, (that which Allah has) destined to exist, up to the Day of Resurrection, but will definitely come, into existence." (Book #46, Hadith #718)
This was a breath of fresh air. I had been seeing so many comments and posts by muslims arguing for slavery and insisting there is nothing islamically, ethically wrong with it but rather only those with liberal values would be against it. It was so painful to think that there are muslims advocating for such oppression in the name of the prophet and God instead of seeing that the prophet pbuh established an ethical trajectory towards abolishment of slavery.
It is morally good in the context of war, it wouldn't be abolished permanently as a war could happen, but why you found it painful wasn't because you have some moral truth in you, but its literally because as is done in every damn culture and century, the dominant ethic has conditioned you into its made up commitments, and so your intuition is tailored with what is indicated to me to have the disgusts and acceptance of a liberal, so what makes some right or wrong is linked to those false values, this is like when a racist Muslim suffers doubts because the dominant ethic at his time commands that blacks should be treated under whites but the Quran and Sunnah say otherwise so he gets disturbed and seeks a justification that suits his racist values and becomes relieved when anything shows a sign interptable to that, I shouldn't be so harsh, but I'm sick of Muslims not doubting these diseased ideas that they are so readily ideaolgically molested into submission, just ask yourself this, why is non consensual harm wrong, why is undesirability wrong, where am I getting these ideas of right and wrong, does it necessitate that just because something has no harm its good or because some country is tech savvy its morally better than those without or that a country with more wealth is more moral, why, I reject this all and I find it all irrelevant to moral judgement rather I want my disgusts and acceptance tailored to Islam and I want to get angry when someone mischarterises Islam, but I find most Muslims are just relieved that Islam can fit into liberalism and are only angry at those who object to that, isn't that pathetic
alhamdulillah, this is excellent and important educational work!! thanks very much to both of you Paul & Justin. May Allah ta'Ala bless you abundantly and provide you with prosperity and well-being!
“Rape is haram in Islam…and abusing slaves is haram in Islam.” (Thanks for teaching us this message that many ignorant people of today have not yet studied thoroughly, while many unkempt men practice misogyny, concubinage, or mistresses-popular in Western and bad Islamic cultures)-what Trump does, for example. Many do not know where this line comes from: “If a man sells his daughter to be a female slave, she shall not go out as the male slaves do.” (Holy Bible, Exodus 21:7). Exodus 21:20, Bible (NKJV version): “And if a man beats his male or female servant with a rod, (which his-story has actually done)-so that he dies under his hand, he shall surely be punished…non withstanding if he remains alive a day or two, he shall NOT be punished; for he is his property.” (What justice is that-misogyny at best, tyranny at worst). People think these lines are in Quran, Astaghfirullah! Deuteronomy 22:21, [Why would a Benevolent and Merciful God of Authenticity ever show only a man’s lustful point of view, while telling the people that rape marriage can ever be legitimized? Beyond my logic. “…And she shall be his wife; he cannot divorce her all of his days.” (God forbid)….”But if the thing is true, and evidences of virginity are not found for the young woman, they shall bring out the young woman to the door of her father’s house, and the MEN of the city shall STONE her to death with STONES.” (Astaghfirullah-which conflicted people place blame on our Faith, instead of studying their own scriptures that are inherently misogynistic)-which conflicted Muslims, even, who know little about the Mercy of Allah in the Quran, May have also ignorantly followed. Whereas, Sura Balad and other Suras teach thinkers to free slaves, to have free will, and to choose between two “highways” or pathways of being. Bad Muslims are many. So are misogynists of ignorance everywhere, yet several Western nations now do what Allah has taught in Quran: equal treatment for all people across hierarchies. Thank you for this important talk, Brothers. Stalking is also forbidden as is spying on people in the Quran since Allah teaches people to practice trust and good faith between religious or non-religious traditions. Sura 49:12, “O you who believe! Avoid suspicion as much as possible…and spy not on each other, nor speak I’ll of each other behind their backs. Would any of you like to eat the flesh of your brother?” Sura 90:7-14, “Does man think that none beholds him? Have we not made him a pair of eyes? And a tongue, and a pair of lips?//And shown him the two highways?//But he has made no haste on the path that is steep. And what will explain to you the path that is steep?//It is FREEING the bondman; or the giving of food in a day of privation//to the orphan with claims of relationship…” Sura TableSpread 5:89, “Allah will not call you to account for what is futile in your oaths, but will call you to account for your deliberate oaths; for expiation, feed ten indigent persons, on a scale of the average for the food of your families; or clothe them; or GIVE A SLAVE his FREEDOM.” “If you disagree about it, don’t lie about it,” says Brother Paul. (Absolutely-why do people lie and make up stupid stories about Muslims and Islam)? Ghulam Sarwar, Islam: Beliefs and Teachings: “Islam strictly forbids any sexual relationship outside of marriage; There is no such thing as as mistress in Islamic society…Having more than one (legal) wife is better and more dignified than having a number of mistresses. Islam holds you responsible for your actions….Polyandry is forbidden in Islam.” {One thinks of the large number of mass shooters who come from severely neglected and abused homes without any inkling of a consistent father figure in the broken home, supposedly once made of “passion” or “love” (lust in today’s lingo, God forbid/Astaghfirullah). Again, thank you for this important knowledge. Correction: “ill” instead of “I’ll” (misspelling)
Collection Sahih Muslim In-book reference Book 17, Hadith 41 Reference Hadith 1456a USC-MSA web (English) reference Book 8, Hadith 3432 Related Qur'an verses 4.24 Abu Sa'id al-Khudri (Allah her pleased with him) reported that at the Battle of Hanain Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) sent an army to Autas and encountered the enemy and fought with them. Having overcome them and taken them captives, the Companions of Allah's Messenger (may peace te upon him) seemed to refrain from having intercourse with captive women because of their husbands being polytheists. Then Allah, Most High, sent down regarding that: " And women already married, except those whom your right hands possess (iv. 24)" (i. e. they were lawful for them when their 'Idda period came to an end).
It was the famous “ Slave Dynasty “ in India that ruled for 200-250 years that was originated from slaves. As a matter of fact this was the only Muslim dynasty in all Muslim history (outside rashidoon) that was not a monarchy and selected on principles of democracy.
islamic writers or scholars claim that these non muslim women prisoners of war were distributed among the muslim soldiers for their safety or to save their lives or to provide for their sustenance. so it is humanity. but their claim is completely false and unreasonable. because if you see those authentic hadiths, you will understand that they avoid the main points by making tricks. reasons firstly, Azl (birth control method) is applied to these women according to the hadith, so that they can not become mothers of children. because if the child is born, she can not be sold or ransomed by returning her to her family. at the same time, companions used to have intercourse with them and perform Azl (birth control). So that they can be sold to another person or to their family to collect ransom after used. what kind of morality it of religion. i tried to explain the hadiths in brief. secondly, if it is for the safety of women prisoners of war then why are they separated from their husbands after being captured. according to shafi'i and maliki law their marriage will be dissolved. because it is in authentic hadith. (very clear here for the purpose of distinction). opinion first of all, now think if someone wants to capture your sister and release her with a ransom. secondly dy doing azl(birth control) if sold to another person after intercourse. thus she is repeatedly sold to different men (after the end of a certain period). now think how much the repeated selling can add to the emotional pain of a woman. physical pain is more terrible. thirdly, her right to be a mother has been destroyed by(azl) birth control. If that seems fair to you. then there is nothing more to say. injustice has been done here...with these hadiths later the Imams of for school(Madhhab)made laws..as a result of which this tyranny continues till the ottoman period. allah is fully responsible for this. allah could have provided them with permanent security during the time of the companions if he willed.
From the past 2 days i was struggling with this, to the point that i was questioning my beliefs.May Allah reward you both brother Paul and brother Justin in this life and in the hereafter as well
@@darksheikh because ulema always justify what was done in the past. I watch videos of concubinage and huri (spouses) in jannah and they give examples of verses in Quran, thus justifying this way. As a woman, it is hard to understand why would islam allow slave women to be used as an object while men also have wifes. And since most ulema are men, they belittle our concerns as women and they sey "do you question Allah's orders? That is what he ordered so stop whining" These topics cause lots of women to question islam unfortunately.
@@محمدبريداوي yes, I am elhamdulillah but I still have questions and I can't find answers to those questions. Me and my friend actually have been trying to find answers for 3 years but everyone says the same things they don't understand our question exactly. If I can't find the answer I will stop searching and try to forget it. I will do as the ulema say. Not because they say it but because Allah is the most just, most merciful and I trust Allah's judgement. Bu ı fear for my friend because she can't just forget it she keeps thinking about this.
@@rumeysa4686 you have problems with this because you are comparing the times we are living in with those times. The situations and environments and the attitude of people are very different from now. They perceived things in other way. I'll give you an example. Many people in the West would say that hitting a child is abuse. People who have been never hit would get shocked by witnessing someone being hit. I have been hit by parents, but also teachers in the mosque. But I don't consider it to be abuse necesserily. As a matter a fact the teacher who impressed me the most in a positive way was a teacher who taught me religion in the mosque. And not the teachers in public school who didn't hit. I consider this teacher one of the kindest teachers I had in my life even when he has hit me several times because i didn't learn my homework well. I knew he didn't to abuse but to motivate us to do our best. Things you would think is abuse will be experienced in a different way by people who are used too certain things in life. It is all about how people treat each other and what the intentions are of a person who has power over another person.
Thanks for another phenomenal video, Paul. I look forward along with our other companions here to your future meetings with esteemed, knowledgeable, and most importantly friendly academics regarding our beloved Islam.
34:40 He is trying to find the Hadith? Its this one: حَدَّثَنِي بِشْرُ بْنُ مَرْحُومٍ، حَدَّثَنَا يَحْيَى بْنُ سُلَيْمٍ، عَنْ إِسْمَاعِيلَ بْنِ أُمَيَّةَ، عَنْ سَعِيدِ بْنِ أَبِي سَعِيدٍ، عَنْ أَبِي هُرَيْرَةَ رضى الله عنه عَنِ النَّبِيِّ صلى الله عليه وسلم قَالَ " قَالَ اللَّهُ ثَلاَثَةٌ أَنَا خَصْمُهُمْ يَوْمَ الْقِيَامَةِ، رَجُلٌ أَعْطَى بِي ثُمَّ غَدَرَ، وَرَجُلٌ بَاعَ حُرًّا فَأَكَلَ ثَمَنَهُ، وَرَجُلٌ اسْتَأْجَرَ أَجِيرًا فَاسْتَوْفَى مِنْهُ، وَلَمْ يُعْطِ أَجْرَهُ ". Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "Allah says, 'I will be against three persons on the Day of Resurrection: 1. One who makes a covenant in My Name, but he proves treacherous. 2. One who sells a free person (as a slave) and eats the price, 3. And one who employs a laborer and gets the full work done by him but does not pay him his wages.' " Sahih al-Bukhari 2227 Chapter 106: The sin of a person who sells a free man, Book 34: Sales and Trade
Collection Sahih Muslim In-book reference Book 17, Hadith 41 Reference Hadith 1456a USC-MSA web (English) reference Book 8, Hadith 3432 Related Qur'an verses 4.24 Abu Sa'id al-Khudri (Allah her pleased with him) reported that at the Battle of Hanain Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) sent an army to Autas and encountered the enemy and fought with them. Having overcome them and taken them captives, the Companions of Allah's Messenger (may peace te upon him) seemed to refrain from having intercourse with captive women because of their husbands being polytheists. Then Allah, Most High, sent down regarding that: " And women already married, except those whom your right hands possess (iv. 24)" (i. e. they were lawful for them when their 'Idda period came to an end).
Hello Paul and Justin. Thank you both for this excellent information and very usefull for my study. A very very important topic. I have been searching for something similar on youtube for a while. Highly appreciated. Could you please shed light too on the so called Barbary "slave trade" which basically were prisoners of war (and not chattel slavery) and send back after ransom was paid. Back and forth people were captured in the mediterranean region, incl Balkan muslims by Italian Catholics. Somehow this is (still) being abused as "evidence", using orientalist art most of the time to back this up. Basically a projection of their own shortcomings. I really hope you could make time for this too.
According to that argument, the North African Muslims did not send slaving expeditions north to Europe with the specific intent to capture and sell slaves. And according to that argument, the states of North Africa were in a state of war with Iceland. So they had a legitimate reason to capture Icelandic civilians and sell them in their slave markets. That argument is on thin ice.
@@Thesandchief "How Islam abolished Pre-Islamic Slavery". Despite not agreeing with everything he says creedally/politically, I must say that he nailed it on this one.
So to summarize: Islam came during a time when slavery was common (in a form different than what we associate with the slavery in the US that was based on abuse and racism) and when Islam came it's one of the things it came to reform and phased out by encouraging freeing slaves to earn a reward or to give them their freedom and facilitate their freedom over a period of time. In addition, no avenue for getting new slaves was available, so eventually slavery would be phased out of a society and economy completely without causing too much economic trouble for anyone evolved by forcing immediate changes on anyone. And then there's the treatment of slaves vs freemen: all were to be treated equally and none should be overburned and slaves were supposed to dress in the same way as the freemen and eat the same food they ate. I think it's a very ethical way of dealing with a problem that's already there. Just because a religion mentions a thing you dislike doesn't mean it came and introduced it, sometimes it addresses a scenario that you might not be unfamiliar with but has happened in the past and might happen again the future. God is all-knowing, He teaches us how to deal with problems we encounter. Those who are critical of Islam were yet again projecting their own history onto a different tradition.
No, the history I acknowledge is the invasive, oppressive, enslaving genocidal history of muslims and Islam, from the balkans to West Africa and the shores of the Mediterranean and as far as Ireland. This your history, this is why you're despised.
Quran chapter 90 10. And we showed man the two highways (i. e. the difficult path of virtue vs the easy path of vice and rejection by Allah) 11. But man has not hastened on the "path that is steep" 12. And what do we mean by the "path that is steep"? 13. it is to free a slave 14. or give food to the hungry 15. to a related orphan 16.or to the indigent down in the dust 17. only then does he become a believer, and enjoins patience and enjoins deeds of kindness and compassion
Collection Sahih Muslim In-book reference Book 17, Hadith 41 Reference Hadith 1456a USC-MSA web (English) reference Book 8, Hadith 3432 Related Qur'an verses 4.24 Abu Sa'id al-Khudri (Allah her pleased with him) reported that at the Battle of Hanain Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) sent an army to Autas and encountered the enemy and fought with them. Having overcome them and taken them captives, the Companions of Allah's Messenger (may peace te upon him) seemed to refrain from having intercourse with captive women because of their husbands being polytheists. Then Allah, Most High, sent down regarding that: " And women already married, except those whom your right hands possess (iv. 24)" (i. e. they were lawful for them when their 'Idda period came to an end).
There is still lots of underground slavery in the Arab states. You’d much rather have a legal status as a slave in the Islamic past than a paid foreign worker in Saudi Arabia or Dubai today.
One could make an easy argumemt that Global Western Capitalism has been defacto slavery. Sweatshops globally making products for pennies for Western consumers
Not even Arab countries, like in some west African countries. They treat their house helps like they are slaves. It is so depressing. It is so depressing
Salaam Paul and Justin. Jazak’Allahu khairan for discussing this v sensitive topic in a such detailed and thorough manner. Knowledge is power and you’ve managed to shut up the islamophobes.
Daniel Haqiqatjou continues to use this terminology and states that Forced Sex / "Rape" via "Sex Slaves" is permissible... as this is what Slavery means, and helps the population to expand etc. I normally respect his views, but this is just so erroneous. I've brought this up a few times, but he doubles down each time. It would be worth having this conversation with him, as he has a number of skewed videos on this that gets many views.
Yh I don't think it's right for him to use the term sex slave instead of concubines but I think in terms of expanding the population, he was talking purely from an evolutionary standpoint
@wanderingstar5270 There is a difference between a female "slave" and Milk Yameen, which is initially declared. A female "slave" can marry another slave. And you have it completely wrong, owning a "slave" doesn't mean they become your property to do as you please. We all belong to Allah. Slave or no slave.
@@jagoman85 I didn’t say he could do as he pleases. Islam codified slavery and there were laws. But consent was not part of this code or law, so sex was lawful to him. There is nothing in Islam about seeking a slaves consent for sex. If the female was a prisoner of war her marriage could be nullified and she can be owned and used for sex by her enslaver. But if she was married after being enslaved say to another slave then yes the owner could not have sex with her. But he could if she was single and it was his right as long as he fed and clothed her
Justin Parrott bases his teaching on this hadith, see p. 22. ‘Abd Allāh ibn Mas’ūd, “Whatever the Muslims view as good is good in the sight of Allah, and whatever they view as evil is evil in the sight of Allah." (Aḥmad ibn Ḥanbal, Musnad al-Imām Aḥmad ibn Ḥanbal (Beirut: Mu’assasat al-Risālah, 2001), 6:84, #3600; declared fair (ḥasan) by Al-Arnā’ūṭ in the comments.) Do people in this group agree with this?
I find the argument that Islam set us on a course to abolish slavery a hard one to swallow. If that was so, alcohol was also ubiquitous but it was outlawed pretty quickly. Why not the same with slavery?
True. It might be because slavery is part of human life in one or another. For example, in WW1 German women turned to prostitution to support themselves because so many of their men died. They would have been taken as slaves in the pre-industrial era. So which one would be preferable? Not only for women but for society as a whole? There's also debt slavery. Sometimes I think of how Western govt legalised prostitution in order to protect the prostitutes from abuse. Right now the world has millions of modern slaves in terms of debt and labor. So will govts legalise slavery in order to protect the rights of these slaves? I don't know. I mean Islam has a full fledged system of laws and rules regarding slavery but the West never did which lead to chattel slavery.
Abolishing slavery uses at that time is the same thing that abolishing gasoline uses today. It is in some ways harmful, but is it was a necessity and strongly implemented in the international global trade and economy. We can't abolish gasoline right away, but we can find, explore and install limits and rights for decreasing the harm of it. Same thing with slavery back then. The prophet Muhammad is like an activist for ecology today, but applied to slavery. You should remember that the first Muslims, the first people that followed Muhammad (sws) was the poorest people of Mecca including a lot of slaves. As matter of fact, one reproach that the authorities Pagan of Mecca addressed to Muhammad (sws) is the fact that he urged slaves to stand up against their harsh conditions. Slaves who became muslims also became less obedient to their tyrannical masters.
Another great video from your channel, Paul ! Truly humbling to learn of the islamic principles of fiqh from such esteemed scholars. I have only had the good pleasure of reading one book by Dr Jonathan Brown (misquoting Muhammad) and I'll admit I found it a difficult read in some places, although after your recommendation i think i should like to look into his other works as well. Thank you again ! May Allah bless you for your efforts.
Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said, "Whoever says, 'Subhan Allah wa bihamdihi,' one hundred times a day, will be forgiven all his sins even if they were as much as the foam of the sea. Sahih al-Bukhari 6405
Just how authentic are these narrations..?? The evil Ummayad Dynasty founded by the scoundrel Muawiya fabricated countless absurd narrations and attributed these absurdities to our beloved Rasulullah..!!
@@mahnazbahaji2648 Collection Sahih Muslim In-book reference Book 17, Hadith 41 Reference Hadith 1456a USC-MSA web (English) reference Book 8, Hadith 3432 Related Qur'an verses 4.24 Abu Sa'id al-Khudri (Allah her pleased with him) reported that at the Battle of Hanain Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) sent an army to Autas and encountered the enemy and fought with them. Having overcome them and taken them captives, the Companions of Allah's Messenger (may peace te upon him) seemed to refrain from having intercourse with captive women because of their husbands being polytheists. Then Allah, Most High, sent down regarding that: " And women already married, except those whom your right hands possess (iv. 24)" (i. e. they were lawful for them when their 'Idda period came to an end).
Remarkable suggestion Paul - change of the word “slave “. Much is always lost in translation. People always evaluate history from the lens of the existing era. Serious historians always disagree with this.
I do hope this material is translated especially into Urdu so that jurists and particularly government officials and members of parliament as well as the general public may educate themselves. Though concubines per se do not exist, so far as I know, other women are coerced by husbands, even other relatives, and a complete understanding is essential.
many people who are poorly versed in matters of Quran often cite a verses of the Quran to justify their false belief that unwed relationships with slaves is permitted in Islam. This assumption is unwarranted and completely baseless. Not a single verse in Quran mentions that unwed relationships with anyone, be they be free men or free women, prisoner men or prisoner women, is remotely permitted. The word “amah” which means female slave or the word “’abd” which means male slaves are not mentioned anywhere in the Quran as to legalize sexual reations with them. However, the word “malakat aimanukum” mentioned in several verses alongside the phrase “azwaaj” which means wife, according to some scholars the word “malakat aimanukum” meant “the female prisoners among your wives”. This verse was emphasizing the point that in order to marry a free woman, a man had to pay a certain amount of dowry to make sexual relation permissible with her, but in case of female prisoners, upon marriage and consummation of the union which could be ascertained with the birth of a child, the prisoner was pronounced to be free, and hence emancipation was considered the dowry and monetary gifts were not required. Marriage was freedom and freedom was dowry (in case of female prisoners).
Collection Sahih Muslim In-book reference Book 17, Hadith 41 Reference Hadith 1456a USC-MSA web (English) reference Book 8, Hadith 3432 Related Qur'an verses 4.24 Abu Sa'id al-Khudri (Allah her pleased with him) reported that at the Battle of Hanain Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) sent an army to Autas and encountered the enemy and fought with them. Having overcome them and taken them captives, the Companions of Allah's Messenger (may peace te upon him) seemed to refrain from having intercourse with captive women because of their husbands being polytheists. Then Allah, Most High, sent down regarding that: " And women already married, except those whom your right hands possess (iv. 24)" (i. e. they were lawful for them when their 'Idda period came to an end).
I knew the majority of this always good to hear of refresher while learning some key points a long the way. Islam is a system for all times and places and another thing about Islam, it's malleable. Core tenants are not but rulings change from period to period based on the circumstances of the people but the prophets way is the best way and this is why he is THEE role model for mankind.
Collection Sahih Muslim In-book reference Book 17, Hadith 41 Reference Hadith 1456a USC-MSA web (English) reference Book 8, Hadith 3432 Related Qur'an verses 4.24 Abu Sa'id al-Khudri (Allah her pleased with him) reported that at the Battle of Hanain Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) sent an army to Autas and encountered the enemy and fought with them. Having overcome them and taken them captives, the Companions of Allah's Messenger (may peace te upon him) seemed to refrain from having intercourse with captive women because of their husbands being polytheists. Then Allah, Most High, sent down regarding that: " And women already married, except those whom your right hands possess (iv. 24)" (i. e. they were lawful for them when their 'Idda period came to an end).
ما ملكت ايمانكم The right hand is more honorable because the the righteous people will receive their record of deeds in the right hand ﴿سورة الـحاقـة﴾ ١٩) فَأَمَّا مَنْ أُوتِيَ كِتَابَهُ بِيَمِينِهِ فَيَقُولُ هَاؤُمُ اقْرَءُوا كِتَابِيَهْ ٢٠) إِنِّي ظَنَنْتُ أَنِّي مُلَاقٍ حِسَابِيَهْ ٢١) فَهُوَ فِي عِيشَةٍ رَاضِيَةٍ [Quran Chapter 69] 19. So as for he who is given his record in his right hand, he will say, "Here, read my record! 20. Indeed, I was certain that I would be meeting my account." 21. So he will be in a pleasant life -
Thank you very much for raising such a subject. It’s very informative and useful; especially these times where enemies of Islam use it to spread doubts about Islam, taking advantage of the ignorance of Muslims of this subject because it’s not currently practiced. The guest is knowledgeable and well-chosen. Thank you brother Paul.
Alot of Non-Muslims especially Christians and Atheists say that in Islam if a woman is raped and there are No 4 witnesses then the Rapist will go Scot free and the women will be punished,some of them have a misunderstanding about the difference between the Punishment of Death which requires 4 witnesses and the difference between any other Punishment in which the 4 witnesses are NOT required, suppose like 10 years prison etc,even alot of Muslims don't know this and they get trapped easily by this from Non-Muslims......If there are circumstantial evidences and in addition medical evidence then the Qadi Judge can give anyother punishment to the Rapist except the Death Penalty,and the woman will go free because she's innocent and was a victim,now read the evidence for this from the great Scholars of Islam and Hadiths,Imam Malik (may Allah have mercy on him) said: “In our view the man who rapes a woman, whether she is a virgin or not, if she is a free woman he must pay a “dowry” like that of her peers, and if she is a slave he must pay whatever has been detracted from her value. The punishment is to be carried out on the rapist and there is no punishment for the woman who has been raped, whatever the case.” (Al-Muwatta, 2/734) Ibn ‘Abd al-Barr (may Allah have mercy on him) said: “The scholars are unanimously agreed that the rapist is to be subjected to the hadd punishment if there is clear evidence against him that he deserves the hadd punishment, or if he admits to that. Otherwise, he is to be punished (i.e., if there is no proof that the hadd punishment for zina may be carried out against him because he does not confess, and there are not four witnesses, then the judge may punish him and stipulate a punishment that will deter him and others like him). There is no punishment for the woman if it is true that he forced her and overpowered her, which may be proven by her screaming and shouting for help.” (Al-Istidhkaar, 7/146)
Bukhari #2227 narrated the Qudsi Hadith: {قال الله: ثلاثة أنا خصمهم يوم القيامة: رجل أعطى بي ثم غدر، ورجل باع حرا فأكل ثمنه، ورجل استأجر أجيرًا فاستوفى منه ولم يعطه أجره} Allah said: (Three [people] I'll be their rival on the day of judgment: A man who gave [a promise] in my name then he betrayed, a man who sold a free person then consumed his bounty, and a man who sought a service from a service provider and received the service but denied the payment of the service)
There’s a book written by the late Dr Jerald F. Dirks ‘Muslims in American History’ it did cover about the African Muslims slaves that were brought to America, these slaves were highly educated equivalent to modern day Masters or phd level.
Exactly. For the lack of a better term, "slave" is wrong to use in the Islamic history context. Sadly "server" or "servant" is not quite correctly describe it either.
@@tororo76 prisoners in old america also work for free like railroad works, police plates, cleaning the prisons. Were they slaves? oh yeah "lol". "lol" will make my statements more credible.
@@alexferdinansyah757 I’m not sure why America always needs to come into it. If you are buying and selling humans and they are your legal property then that’s a slave. That’s what happened under Islam.
no they had the right ...there is something in islam called mukataba it's mentionned in the quran ...mukataba is a contract between the "slave" and the master where the "slave" can "buy" himself which means if a slave what to no more be a slave he can do a contract where he pay the master a some of money to be free and it's obligatory which means the master can't refuse ........second you said they were not paid and actually that's not true also bcs the prophet mohamed said that the master is obliged to feed him from what he eat and to clothes him from what he wears and to let them life in where they live so everything the master eat drink wear sleep is also for the slaves this an equivalent to payment@@tororo76
Dar-us-Salam reference Hadith 2131 Ahmad Hasan translation Hadith 2126 USC-MSA web (English) reference Book 11, Hadith 2126 A man from the Ansar called Basrah said: I married a virgin woman in her veil. When I entered upon her, I found her pregnant. (I mentioned this to the Prophet). The Prophet (ﷺ) said: She will get the dower, for you made her vagina lawful for you. The child will be your slave. When she has begotten (a child), flog her (according to the version of al-Hasan). The version of Ibn AbusSari has: You people, flog her, or said: inflict hard punishment on him. Abu Dawud said: This tradition has been transmitted by Qatadah from Sa'd b. Yazid on the authority of Ibn al-Musayyab in a similar way. This tradition has been narrated by Yahya b. Abi Kathir from Yazid b. Nu'aim from Sa'id b. al-Musayyab, and 'Ata al-Khurasani narrated it from Sa'id b. al-Musayyab ; they all narrated this tradition from the Prophet (ﷺ) omitting the link of the Companion (i.e. a mursal tradition). The version of Yahya b. Abi Kathir has: Basrah b. Aktham married a woman. The agreed version has: He made the child his servant. حَدَّثَنَا مَخْلَدُ
I have read Muhammad al Jibali’s books before. I have a question regarding the “the right hand possess” of a war captive woman. A married Muslim man is allowed to “own” this captive woman and have sex with her. This seems to contradict how strict Islam is with Zinna/sex outside of marriage. Would a married Muslim woman be able to have sex with a war captive man she owns? If she cannot, this does not seem fair or logical- this seems like a double standard. Please explain this matter.
I think that this matter should be revised. Because it seems that the Quran indicates that u can't have sex.with a melek yamen unless u have a contract with her A marriage like contract. So if thats the case this would solve ur objection which I found very logical and I asked it to myself previously.
Jazkallah kahayrn for this interview. But I still wished you questioned him more about the injustices of the harem institution and about the tanzimat reforms which was based off of secular ideas. The Quran already have stated that it's best for a Muslim to free a slave than keeping them enslaved.And can you interview a scholar on the situation about the hagia sophia and the Orthodox Christians inshallah
Alot of Non-Muslims especially Christians and Atheists say that in Islam if a woman is raped and there are No 4 witnesses then the Rapist will go Scot free and the women will be punished,some of them have a misunderstanding about the difference between the Punishment of Death which requires 4 witnesses and the difference between any other Punishment in which the 4 witnesses are NOT required, suppose like 10 years prison etc,even alot of Muslims don't know this and they get trapped easily by this from Non-Muslims......If there are circumstantial evidences and in addition medical evidence then the Qadi Judge can give anyother punishment to the Rapist except the Death Penalty,and the woman will go free because she's innocent and was a victim,now read the evidence for this from the great Scholars of Islam and Hadiths,Imam Malik (may Allah have mercy on him) said: “In our view the man who rapes a woman, whether she is a virgin or not, if she is a free woman he must pay a “dowry” like that of her peers, and if she is a slave he must pay whatever has been detracted from her value. The punishment is to be carried out on the rapist and there is no punishment for the woman who has been raped, whatever the case.” (Al-Muwatta, 2/734) Ibn ‘Abd al-Barr (may Allah have mercy on him) said: “The scholars are unanimously agreed that the rapist is to be subjected to the hadd punishment if there is clear evidence against him that he deserves the hadd punishment, or if he admits to that. Otherwise, he is to be punished (i.e., if there is no proof that the hadd punishment for zina may be carried out against him because he does not confess, and there are not four witnesses, then the judge may punish him and stipulate a punishment that will deter him and others like him). There is no punishment for the woman if it is true that he forced her and overpowered her, which may be proven by her screaming and shouting for help.” (Al-Istidhkaar, 7/146)
I am also muslim. islamic writers or scholars claim that these non muslim women prisoners of war were distributed among the muslim soldiers for their safety or to save their lives or to provide for their sustenance. so it is humanity. but their claim is completely false and unreasonable. because if you see those authentic hadiths, you will understand that they avoid the main points by making tricks. reasons firstly, Azl (birth control method) is applied to these women according to the hadith, so that they can not become mothers of children. because if the child is born, she can not be sold or ransomed by returning her to her family. at the same time, companions used to have intercourse with them and perform Azl (birth control). So that they can be sold to another person or to their family to collect ransom after used. what kind of morality it of religion. i tried to explain the hadiths in brief. secondly, if it is for the safety of women prisoners of war then why are they separated from their husbands after being captured. according to shafi'i and maliki law their marriage will be dissolved. because it is in authentic hadith. (very clear here for the purpose of distinction). opinion first of all, now think if someone wants to capture your sister and release her with a ransom. secondly dy doing azl(birth control) if sold to another person after intercourse. thus she is repeatedly sold to different men (after the end of a certain period). now think how much the repeated selling can add to the emotional pain of a woman. physical pain is more terrible. thirdly, her right to be a mother has been destroyed by(azl) birth control. If that seems fair to you. then there is nothing more to say. injustice has been done here...with these hadiths later the Imams of for school(Madhhab)made laws..as a result of which this tyranny continues till the ottoman period. allah is fully responsible for this. allah could have provided them with permanent security during the time of the companions if he willed.
@@hashimawan2433Bukhari 4138(book 64 hadith 182)or muslim 1438(book 16 hadith 146) please also study all hadith about it your self from bukhari & shahin muslim
@@NRFP I entered the Mosque and saw Abu Sa`id Al-Khudri and sat beside him and asked him about Al-Azl (i.e. coitus interruptus). Abu Sa`id said, "We went out with Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) for the Ghazwa of Banu Al-Mustaliq and we received captives from among the Arab captives and we desired women and celibacy became hard on us and we loved to do coitus interruptus. So when we intended to do coitus interrupt us, we said, 'How can we do coitus interruptus before asking Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) who is present among us?" We asked (him) about it and he said, 'It is better for you not to do so, for if any soul (till the Day of Resurrection) is predestined to exist, it will exist."
i have no intention of watching the entire video, for those who watched the video. are they justifying slavery (regardless of whether the owner is good to his slaves) and concubinage? update: yeah theyre legit saying its okay, i hope they one day get to feel a fraction of what its like to be a slave
Would like more clarity on Concubines: I thought this is haram because in the Western meaning of the word this is like , 'living together' without marriage, so it is like, 'fornication' which is forbidden. So are we sure that these verses have not been misinterpretated ? I think Islam expects the marriage but the name of 'concunine' remained stuck inorder to distinguish the 'Prisoners of War' people from ordinary source.
It is clear that concubines were slav3s used for s3x outside of marriage because a law says if a concubine bears a child to her owner she is free when the owner dies. Clearly a wife is already a free woman.
The thing that handicaps us mentally as Muslims is that we presuppose that the derived laws are the laws of God, when clearly they are not. Now, the derived laws are of course useful and relevant in that it informs us about the historical engagement with the legal tradition and the way in which they sought to regulate their societies. However, not unlike modern legislation that is made and renewed constantly, that was true for Islamic law in the past as well and if you look closely in many Muslim countries is still true today. At one point the predominant view one Muslim country was that a woman needed her guardian to marry, but when so many guardians prohibit their daughters from every getting married and it resulted in a crisis in which most people are single, they tried to circumvent that an adopt a different legal opinion in which they then said that adult Muslim women don't require a guardian to get married. These things are dynamic and relative and we seldom see it that way.
This Hadith settles it Abu Dharr reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Whoever is suitable for you among your slaves, feed them from the same food you eat and clothe them from the same clothes you wear. Whoever is not suitable for you, sell them and do not torture the creation of Allah.” Source: Sunan Abī Dāwūd 5161
The US withdrew from the intermediate-range nuclear forces treaty on a whim 2years ago. On a WHIM . The U.N. is already falling apart before our own eyes. Even if tomorrow they make a peace deal. We see with our own eyes how they honor treaties. All of the sudden there's a proxy war in Ukraine between largest un coutries! They only make up laws for temporary convenience, Brag about how civilized they're , then break their own treaties even amongst themselves. Today, the un, even us generals say that destroying the infrastructure, electricity water... Amount to warcrimes. Wait ! what about destroying infrastructure , electricity and water ... in Iraq? Oh sry i guess they don't count for "subhuman" "deser n" Iraqis. Then these two hypocrites come and say islamic laws are abolished. Because the U.N. temporarily pretend to say so? These hypocrites are Just like their predecessor "the other paul (saul)" after his "encounter on the road to Damascus" , says laws are abolished "fullfilled...", says that gentiles and jews don't need to follow the law anymore. China is using uhygurs like slaves in forced labor . even their own chinese is considered cheap labor compared to the west. The west is ok with it, as long as apple, hp , microsft... Continue to get their share of that "cheap work force". What do you think will happen if another proxy war happen in Taiwan? What do you think will happen if india also decides to also not share their cheap labor with the west? Western workforce will at first think they finally got their jobs back, All of the sudden minmum wage laws will be abandoned at the request of apple, ge , ms, ... Then all of the sudden it's inconvenient for them to work for cheap like that. Then all of the sudden abolish the "abolished salvery laws",... Just use different wording for it. Humane Masks will drop off in a second due to any inconvenience, they have no principle they honor no treaties.
Never forget what Allah said "But if you were to obey most of those on Earth, they would make you stray from the way of God. THEY FOLLOW NOTHING BUT ASSUMPTIONS, and they do nothing but make conjectures(Opinion based on incomplete information) Qur'an Majeed 6.116
Western slavery was unique as it practiced this on an industrial level and formed the foundation of their modern economies like the US. Western slavery also targeted a specific race. The term SLAVERY carries the western baggage of racism and mass scale industrial colonialism. This did not exist on the same scale or in an ethnocentric way in the muslim world.
Dar-us-Salam reference Hadith 2131 Ahmad Hasan translation Hadith 2126 USC-MSA web (English) reference Book 11, Hadith 2126 A man from the Ansar called Basrah said: I married a virgin woman in her veil. When I entered upon her, I found her pregnant. (I mentioned this to the Prophet). The Prophet (ﷺ) said: She will get the dower, for you made her vagina lawful for you. The child will be your slave. When she has begotten (a child), flog her (according to the version of al-Hasan). The version of Ibn AbusSari has: You people, flog her, or said: inflict hard punishment on him. Abu Dawud said: This tradition has been transmitted by Qatadah from Sa'd b. Yazid on the authority of Ibn al-Musayyab in a similar way. This tradition has been narrated by Yahya b. Abi Kathir from Yazid b. Nu'aim from Sa'id b. al-Musayyab, and 'Ata al-Khurasani narrated it from Sa'id b. al-Musayyab ; they all narrated this tradition from the Prophet (ﷺ) omitting the link of the Companion (i.e. a mursal tradition). The version of Yahya b. Abi Kathir has: Basrah b. Aktham married a woman. The agreed version has: He made the child his servant. حَدَّثَنَا مَخْلَدُ
Can any muslim explain this hadith to me? I am having doubts about my deen. عَنِ الشَّعْبِيِّ، قَالَ كَانَ جَرِيرٌ يُحَدِّثُ عَنِ النَّبِيِّ صلى الله عليه وسلم " إِذَا أَبَقَ الْعَبْدُ لَمْ تُقْبَلْ لَهُ صَلاَةٌ وَإِنْ مَاتَ مَاتَ كَافِرًا " . وَأَبَقَ غُلاَمٌ لِجَرِيرٍ فَأَخَذَهُ فَضَرَبَ عُنُقَهُ . Jarir used to narrate from the Prophet (ﷺ) [ﷺ]: "If a slave runs away, no Salah will be accepted from him, and if he dies he will die a disbeliever." A slave of Jarir's ran away, and he caught him and struck his neck (killing him). Sahih (Darussalam) Sunan an-Nasa'i, 4050 In-Book Reference: Book 37, Hadith 85 English Reference: Vol. 5, Book 37, Hadith 4055
slavery salaams. I am no scholar but have recently been reading and thinking of this and just wanted to offer some insight in case I may get some reward from Allah. I'd like to start with saying that the prophet Muhammad pbuh is the first person in recorded history to say that a black person is not greater than the white and that the white is not greater than the black, essentially human equality (see last sermon). In this context we understand that slavery in arabia was more of an economic class than situation one ethnicity experienced such as blacks in America. Even in the bible, book of Numbers chapters 31, Jews were encouraged to enslave virgin non-jewish women among their enemies for themselves. Unfortunately when the prophet hits the ground 1400 years ago, this slave class is rampant in the society (various forms existing worldwide actually) along with other major problems like alcohol. Getting rid of slavery and alcohol occured in stepwise fashion. If you try to ban such things over night without convincing people of the reasonings, you drive those practises further into darkness where it occurs with even less regulation as we saw with prohibition in the USA which led to underground alcohol production that blinded and killed people due to not using the correct ingredients (methyl alcohol). If slavery had been banned in one night we would've had human trafficking and people doing more to hide their slaves. How would you get rid of it? The muslim approach is to slow down getting new slaves, making conquering towns and turning everyone into slaves prohibited, and incentivizing freeing slaves. For example if you break an oath, you have to free a slave. If you have sex while fasting, you have to free a slave. Many sins require freeing a slave if possible. Also it is important that if slavery exists in a society, there should be rules for it. America had no rules so slaves had no rights. America had no problem going to Africa and turning people into slaves to create a working class, but that is not allowed in islam. Eventually even the prophet's wife Aisha said it was difficult to find a slave to free! Anywhere that islam is practised eventually you will dry up the slave class. Today human trafficking for sex worldwide and sweat shops in China and other places are modern slavery and there is no way out and no rights. In islam a slave had to eat from your food and dress from your clothes and they could make a contract with their owner to buy their freedom,in addition to freeing a slqve being seen as a huge good dead. Unfortunately enslaving people is something humans do and it is better to have to rules than not to limit human suffering until it can be abolished. Today slavery is illegal worldwide.
🔴 Christians nowadays: *where is Muhammad in the Bible ?* Definitely nobody St. Jerome in his Letter 57.6-7: Time would fail me were I to unfold the testimonies of all who have translated only according to the sense... That secular and church writers should have adopted this line need not surprise us when we consider that the translators of the Septuagint, the evangelists, and the apostles, have done the same in dealing with the sacred writings. We read in Mark Mark 5:41 of the Lord saying Talitha cumi and it is immediately added “which is interpreted, Damsel, I say unto you, arise.” The evangelist may be charged with falsehood for having added the words “I say unto you” for the Hebrew is only “Damsel arise.”
23:34 I think Imam Tom Explained this better and he said it was refugee resettlement program called "Rik" because nomadic tribes after defeat were vulnerable to the dangers of robbery,prostitution etc.
Slavery could have been ended with one verse. The problem is, where would the slaves have gone? How would they've fed themselves. What about women slaves. Children? Old people? Quran set a gradual program of emancipation. 47-4 closed the door on new slaves. 24-33 provided deed of emancipation. 90-13 reads: free slaves, literally, take off their yokes; this verse came very early in Islam; following verses address potential needs of freed slaves. 4-92, 58-3, 5-89 made freeing of slaves the primary, if not the only, way for expiation of bigger sins. 9-60 opened state's treasury for freeing slaves.
So all mighty Allah has no better solution? When slavery ended in America the slaves became free and didn't move anywhere. Lots of them were given free lands and others were given lands and options to farm and buy the lands. Several towns and cities were created by those free slaves in America. Sorry, but your whole comment is absurd. Allah sent a whole book of his FINAL words of moral answers to humans on how to treat each other without a single verse to stop slavery? Not even a single verse to show his anger about humans owning their fellow humans as properties! Yet, he sees it more important to add in this book the personal sexual conveniences of Muhammad! In fact, Allah said he will not accept the prayers of any muslim slave that escapes from slavery! عَنِ الشَّعْبِيِّ، قَالَ كَانَ جَرِيرٌ يُحَدِّثُ عَنِ النَّبِيِّ صلى الله عليه وسلم " إِذَا أَبَقَ الْعَبْدُ لَمْ تُقْبَلْ لَهُ صَلاَةٌ وَإِنْ مَاتَ مَاتَ كَافِرًا " . وَأَبَقَ غُلاَمٌ لِجَرِيرٍ فَأَخَذَهُ فَضَرَبَ عُنُقَهُ . Jarir used to narrate from the Prophet (ﷺ) [ﷺ]: "If a slave runs away, no Salah will be accepted from him, and if he dies he will die a disbeliever." A slave of Jarir's ran away, and he caught him and struck his neck (killing him). Sahih (Darussalam) Sunan an-Nasa'i, 4050 In-Book Reference: Book 37, Hadith 85 English Reference: Vol. 5, Book 37, Hadith 4055
@@azhaniaorgena6941 In USA, a slave was a property. Quran 4-25 says we are the same, slaves or otherwise. Emancipation order passed in 1863 but only for confederate held territory, and become the 13th amendment in 1865. Towns like Freedmen's Town in Houston and Nicodemus (Kansas) benefited from Homestead laws and were indeed remarkable achievements but today exist mainly as historical sites. Tuskegee's Syphilis study (1932-1972) was unethical human experimentation. Jim Crow laws existed till the 1960's, and de fact segregation and discrimination persisted in various forms. Americans had good intentions, but when dealing with inter-generational problems, a paced process of education and changing the mores is better, and that is what Quran undertook. The Muslim tradition did not purge any books. So whatever traditions were passed along, have been report. The tradition you quoted is about a slave escaping to Mecca at the time of war when Meccans were non-believers. Even if the tradition is true, it represents what the narrator reported, it is not the word of God. As far as narrations go, there is narration Bukhari 6050 that slaves (actually Quran told us early on not to call them slaves) are our brothers and sisters and one must feed and clothe them the same way as one eats and dresses.
@@AbidNasim Slaves were properties too in the Umma. That's why Allah aka Muhammad said you can have sex with your slaves because you rightfully own them as shares from war. Muhammad bought and sold slaves. Nowhere in the Quran does it stop or condemn slavery. It doesn't mention anywhere in the Quran about ending slavery gradually or in phases. Stop the cognitive dissonance. Provide proof if you have them.
@@AbidNasim Don't care. You filth didn't care for the people before you enslaved them, you dont deserve apologetics and excuses now after the fact. Anti-humanity scum is what your kind are.
The term concubine is not exist in the Qur'an.The term in the Qur'an in arabic"ma meleket eymanukum" mostly translating in the meaning "concubine" in english. But it is not true translation as I knew. Its word by word translation is;"the person(female) who has got your words(oaths)" It means;The person you employ for a certain fee or commitment.İn my opinion,Maid/female servant instead of a concubine would be a more appropriate translation.
@@wanderingstar5270 Umm:Mother Walad :Male Kid But if you're going to use it as a noun phrase ;the correct writing should be;"umm-ulwalad" and means;The Kid's mother. But I didn't understand why did you ask that! what does it have to do with
@@fatihmehmetkarabacak I was referring to the title given to a slave who bore a child to her owner. Perhaps I misunderstood your comment but I understood you to mean that female slaves were never in the role of concubines. I was therefore asking about slaves who were in this position of concubine.
@@wanderingstar5270 I just said;"The term concubine is not exist in the Qur'an".I explained what the use of the term translated as Concubine in the Qur'an actually means.If someone is going to marry his servant, the Quran also shows ways to marry them.For example Quran 4/25;"And whoso is not able to afford to marry free(not servant), believing women, let them marry from the believing maids whom got your words/oaths". In the Qur'an, the subject of marrying a female servant (ma meleket eyman) or a slave woman (emet) is always used with "lawful marriage". You cannot find a usage area called sex slavery/concubine or sexual intercourse without lawful wedding in the Qur'an. All expressions regarding the sexual intercourse with a servant, a slave or a free person are used together with "lawful marriage". There is no verse in the Qur'an that allows you to have sexual intercourse with a slave or servant according to your own will.
Sheygh. Question: i was before in a long distance relationship with a morrocoon girl. She was from morrocco. I am from europe. She showed lots of enthousiasm to marry me. But when becoming fiancees then slowly i got more and more signals from her that having in the future sexual relationship is going to be a big mess, with lots of restrictions for happy and relax sexual intercourse. She suddenly start to put restictions like putting forth hadith about: if the woman does not like the sex,she cannot be forced for sexual intercourse. Or putting cloths between the two bodies with a hole for the sexual intercourse. By the way,i am empath and not a narcissist. Question: did i do good for both of us by rejecting the future marriage because from the beginning she already started putting restrictions in the future sexual intercourse, even before marriage? Thank you for answering
If we refer to the "Masters" as the "Custodians" then I think it would be only appropriate if we refer to the "Slaves" as "Custodies". As I think Custody is a much better word and more closer to the Arabic "Ma Malakat Aymanukum" contextually.
It is so necessary for all believing Muslims to arm themselves with this knowledge that was shared between these very informed gentlemen. Some Muslims do not take the time to read up this knowledge and sometimes it is even hard to come by. So listening to your shows is another way of gaining very valuable knowledge.
Thank you brothers Paul and Justin.
There is no slavery in Islam- only prisoners.
There is no ransom in Islam- only bail.
One thousand four hundred and fifty years ago, when Islam came on the scene, it nullified and negated the concept of slavery. No ruler or progenitor was allowed to treat his subjects or offspring as his slaves. Every individual was bestowed with well-defined rights; the ruler and the ruled, the progenitor and the offspring had to live within the limits prescribed by religion; no one could transgress those limits.
Islam was the first religion to name every man and woman equal in the sight of God. Everyone was born free. There was no slavery system in Islam until pagans started taking Muslims as slaves- those Muslims who were not protected by powerful tribes were captured and sold to enemies who killed, tortured and persecuted them mercilessly.
islamic writers or scholars claim that these non muslim women prisoners of war were distributed among the muslim soldiers for their safety or to save their lives or to provide for their sustenance. so it is humanity. but their claim is completely false and unreasonable. because if you see those authentic hadiths, you will understand that they avoid the main points by making tricks. reasons firstly, Azl (birth control method) is applied to these women according to the hadith, so that they can not become mothers of children. because if the child is born, she can not be sold or ransomed by returning her to her family. at the same time, companions used to have intercourse with them and perform Azl (birth control). So that they can be sold to another person or to their family to collect ransom after used. what kind of morality it of religion. i tried to explain the hadiths in brief. secondly, if it is for the safety of women prisoners of war then why are they separated from their husbands after being captured. according to shafi'i and maliki law their marriage will be dissolved. because it is in authentic hadith. (very clear here for the purpose of distinction). opinion first of all, now think if someone wants to capture your sister and release her with a ransom.
secondly dy doing azl(birth control) if sold to another person after intercourse. thus she is repeatedly sold to different men (after the end of a certain period). now think how much the repeated selling can add to the emotional pain of a woman. physical pain is more terrible. thirdly, her right to be a mother has been destroyed by(azl) birth control.
If that seems fair to you. then there is nothing more to say. injustice has been done here...with these hadiths later the Imams of for school(Madhhab)made laws..as a result of which this tyranny continues till the ottoman period. allah is fully responsible for this. allah could have provided them with permanent security during the time of the companions if he willed.
anyway......try to calm down your uncle jordan :D
so is slavery still allowed in islam? concubines?
@@MichaelMalzahn-s9g The term concubine is not exist in the Qur'an.The term in the Qur'an in arabic"ma meleket eyman" mostly translating in the meaning "concubine" in english. But it is not true translation. ıts word for word translation is;"the person(female) who has got your words(oaths)" It means;The person you employ for a certain fee or commitment.
'I'm not saying muslims lived up to that ideal. In history we know they didn't'
Subhanallah, a great reminder to remain humble and strive toward goodness.
Thank you for the wonderful content.
Great! Thank you.
At the time ISIS was torturing the Yazidis in the name of God I asked I discussed the matter of slavery with a "Muslim". He told me that In Islam a slave was a master's due. He could do whatever he wished. I could not believe my ears and stopped the conversation. May Allah open the heart of such people to true Islam!
Isis is a disgrace to islam
First of all, there is no evidence that they were being tortured (CNN, BBC or any other kafir sources do not count). Secondly, the basic rule in legal rulings is that everything is halal unless proven otherwise. Not the other way around where I have to search up evidence for it being halal. In fact, there's a well-known Hadith that says something like "do not hit you wife in a manner that you would hit your slave".
Also, why would u refer to the person u discussed with as a Muslim in parentheses? Are u takfiring them just for making such a statement? May Allah truly guide us aameen.
@@fmohammed23 "do not hit you wife in a manner that you would hit your slave" are you saying it's ok to hit ur slave? I'm gonna give you the benefit of the doubt as every muslim should and say you didn't mean it that way but u certainly did make it look like that by only nitpicking that hadith out of context and ignoring all of the verses in the quran about husna and compassion the no harm principles in islam may Allah guide us both
He is lieing
@@dauharryrahman3398 that guy was right, you du*mb fool study islam yourself. Raping is allowed in Islam. I am 100% right inshallah
Salam alaykoum,
What an important topic ! Christians missionaries and atheists are using this topic in order to try to get Muslim women to leave Islam.
May Allah reward y'all !
This channel is by far my BEST discovery this year. Thank you brother for your work! :)
Welcome aboard!
This channel is a feast for Truth-seekers. Wonderful interviews with men of true scholarship. I sincerely hope he would interview more traditional scholars such as Belal Assad, Muhammad Tim Humble, Ustadh Abulrahman Hassan, Ali Hammuda et al.
It can get morbid when you learn how slavery and kinslaying and harems with 3000 women were normal, but we have to remember that Islam is a belief, and doesn't hinge on Sultans or Kings or whatever
@Wise Wisdom mhm very well said, thank you
But having appointed caliph that represent Islamic Ummah is a bare minimal for Muslims.
This has been a majority view of scholars.
Why? Because their marks as the establishment of Islam on the earth. Which was the essence of prophethood.
@Wise Wisdom monarchy is not seems not the best course of action but real problem of it is, its implementation
M Asad (Leopold Weiss) Quran translation discusses this subject convincingly and academically. Asad and Asi Quran translations are the best by far..!!
@Wise Wisdom Muawiya and the evil Ummayad Dynasty founded by him created ALL the suffering in the ummah of our beloved Rasulullah..!!!
I'm from Phillipines and I'm inspired by the effort and research of our brothers reverts who are more doing efforts to enlighten humanity thank you all brothers may Allah reward you the highest ranks in paradise
Aameen
Parehas tayo pare
Shirk was ubiquitous but Mohmad said it is no more to be practised... Why didn't Mohamd say, "No more slavery."?
@@shamsheerg7519because he said “free the slaves and god will free you from the fire “ instead. Slavery was primarily a universal economic institution and its no coincidence that abolishing it became possible only with the onset of industrialization where machine labour replaced human labour. Before that the most ethical thing you could do to address it was emancipation, not abolishment. It is estimated that the prophet and his household were responsible for the emancipation of some 35,000 slaves alone. Dirty Indian
@@shamsheerg7519 because shirk is the greatest sin. Slavery is not a sin.
Asalamu alaykum Brother Paul and fellow viewers. Please consider the following:
the Quran says:
وَمَن لَّمْ يَسْتَطِعْ مِنكُمْ طَوْلًا أَن يَنكِحَ الْمُحْصَنَاتِ الْمُؤْمِنَاتِ فَمِن مَّا مَلَكَتْ أَيْمَانُكُم مِّن فَتَيَاتِكُمُ الْمُؤْمِنَاتِ ۚ وَاللَّهُ أَعْلَمُ بِإِيمَانِكُم ۚ بَعْضُكُم مِّن بَعْضٍ ۚ فَانكِحُوهُنَّ بِإِذْنِ أَهْلِهِنَّ وَآتُوهُنَّ أُجُورَهُنَّ بِالْمَعْرُوفِ مُحْصَنَاتٍ غَيْرَ مُسَافِحَاتٍ وَلَا مُتَّخِذَاتِ أَخْدَانٍ ۚ فَإِذَا أُحْصِنَّ فَإِنْ أَتَيْنَ بِفَاحِشَةٍ فَعَلَيْهِنَّ نِصْفُ مَا عَلَى الْمُحْصَنَاتِ مِنَ الْعَذَابِ
And whoever among you cannot find the means to marry free, believing women, then he may marry from those whom your right hands possess of believing maids/servants. And Allah is most knowing about your faith. You believers are of one another. So marry them with the permission of their people and give them their due payment according to what is acceptable ……. [Nisa ayah 25]
So the Quran stipulates that the woman from one's right hand needs to be:
1. A believing servant (مِّن فَتَيَاتِكُمُ الْمُؤْمِنَاتِ)
2. Is to be married (فَانكِحُوهُنَّ)
3. Her family/people/tribe need to be informed of the marriage (بِإِذْنِ أَهْلِهِنّ)
4. A dowry payment is to be given according to what is acceptable (وَآتُوهُنَّ أُجُورَهُنَّ بِالْمَعْرُوفِ)
How did the Prophet SAW marry Safia RA and Juwayriyah RA, who were captives of war following a war between the Muslims and their tribe?
The most reliable accounts states that Safia RA became a Muslim and the Prophet freed her and married her with the knowledge of her tribe. Safia RA had great love of the Prophet and became a devout Muslima. In the case of Juwayriyah, she accepted to marry the Prophet and also became a believer. Following her marriage and conversion all her tribe were freed.
The practice of engaging in sexual relations with a slave without a marriage contract is NOT mentioned in the Quran nor is buying and selling slaves, other than when Yusuf AS was sold into slavery ( a practice of ancient times that Muslims unfortunately inherited).
Jazaakumullah khayran, thanks
Thank you for saying this. I've seen so many have plenty of misunderstandings about this issue. Quran is as clear as can be, no X without marriage.
This makes a lot more sense then allowing unrestricted relations with female captives. The Quran is definitely anti-slavery and offers the best guidance Alhumdu Lillah !!!
This is incorrect. One doesn’t need to marry his slave in order to have intercourse with them. This s clearly established in the Quran and in the Sunnah.
If one wants to marry a slave, first the slave must be freed and then the marriage contract can be done. *A wife can't be a slave* .
Also, *no muslim can be taken as a slave* . If they accept Islam, that doesn't mean they are free, but the Prophet ﷺ didn't wage war on other Muslims since *they were the main group of Muslims* besides the Sahaba the Prophet ﷺ sent to do Dawah.
It seems like you missed these verses and ahadith:
وَٱلَّذِينَ هُمْ لِفُرُوجِهِمْ حَـٰفِظُونَ [٧٠:٢٩]
29) And those who guard their chastity (i.e. private parts from illegal sexual acts).
إِلَّا عَلَىٰٓ أَزْوَٰجِهِمْ أَوْ مَا مَلَكَتْ أَيْمَـٰنُهُمْ فَإِنَّهُمْ غَيْرُ مَلُومِينَ [٧٠:٣٠]
30) Except with their wives and the (women slaves and captives) whom their right hands possess, for (then) they are not to be blamed,"
The Sahaba used to have intercourse with new captives after battle. They were not Muslim, they were the enemy and as stated, free muslims can't be taken as slaves nor fought unless in certain conditions.
Here is a good hadith:
sunnah.com/urn/512590
Abu Said al-Khudri said, 'We went out with the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, on the expedition to the Banu al-Mustaliq. *We took some Arabs prisoner, and we desired the women as celibacy was hard for us. We wanted the ransom, so we wanted to practise coitus interruptus* . We said, 'Shall we practise coitus interruptus while the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, is among us before we ask him?' We asked him about that and he said, 'You don't have to not do it. There is no self which is to come into existence up to the Day of Rising but that it will come into existence.' "
@@mohamudahmed6554 So brother are basing the practice of the Sahaba ( fallible humans), BEFORE surat Al Nisa was revealed and before the completion of the religion, as your evidence over the Quran and authentic Sunna ? Allah SWT says to obey Allah and his Messenger and the Messenger married all his wives without exception and gave a dowry other than those who offered themselves to the be married by the Prophet ( with no dowry) as per Surat Al Ahzab ayah 50:
".....and a believing woman if she offers herself to the Prophet, if the Prophet wishes to marry her, that is only for you, excluding the believers."
Also the hadith you quoted is one small part of the story. Banu Mustaliq were captured by Sahaba BUT Prophet SAW married Juwayirah and freed all her tribesman. What they wanted to do was not what happened and they freed all of the woman.
Also final point, right hand possession is not a free right to have relations. The Quran says that woman also have right hand possession. It means to work as a servant for a period of time until they are released.
I hope that is clear brother.
I'm from Bosnia. In spite of 400 years of Ottoman rule, we never had slavery in any form. Thanks Paul and Justin for making this video. Justin, you should make a book out of this paper.
Paul your's 1+1+1 video idea is great. As a regular consumer of your content, it becomes difficult to keep up with higher number of big interviews per week. One main interview per week is great 👍
You consume as much as you are able to. Why are you suggesting Paul to reduce his immense productivity ? It is a blessing from Allah swt.
@@mash0000
Agreed.
Thanks for the video guys- I have been on the fence on converting as I am looking for peace but this topic alone has been holding me back. I’m still a little weary but appreciate this work done
salaams Jimmy. I am no scholar but have recently been reading and thinking of this and just wanted to offer some advise in case I may get some reward from Allah. Unfortunately when the prophet hits the ground 1400 years ago, slavery is rampant in the society (worldwide actually) along with other major problems like alcohol. Getting rid of slavery and alcohol occured in stepwise fashion. If you try to ban such things over night without convincing people of the reasonings, you drive those practises further into darkness where it occurs with even less regulation as we saw with prohibition in the USA which led to alcohol that blinded people due to inability to find correct ingredients. If slavery had been banned in one night we would've had human trafficking and people doing more to hide their slaves. How would you get rid of it? The muslim approach is to slow down getting new slaves,such as conquering towns and turning everyone into slaves being prohibited, and incentivizing freeing slaves. For example if you break an oath, you have to free a slave. If you have sex while fasting, you have to free a slave. Many sins require freeing a slave. Also it is important that if slavery exists in a society running islamic law, there should be rules for it. America had no rules so slaves had no rights. America had no problem going to Africa and turning people into slaves for no reason, but that is not allowed. Eventually even the prophet's wife Aisha said it was difficult to find a slave to free! Anywhere that islam is practised eventually you will dry up the slave class. Today human trafficking for sex and sweat shops in China are modern slavery and there is no way out and no rights. In islam a slave had to eat from your food and dress from your clothes and they could make a contract with their owner to buy their freedom. Unfortunately enslaving people is something humans do and it is better to have to rules than not to limit suffering. I hope this helps.
Bro as a convert myself i go through this questions. So u can ask me questions according to my knowledge i will try to ans
Make haste brother, come back to the source, come back to fitrah. Be Muslim already.
@@muslimemporiumbut sex slavery, no human rights for lgbt and polygamy disturbd my heart. And yes position of women too
@@free_palestine786
but sex slavery, no human rights for lgbt and polygamy disturbd my heart. And yes position of women too
If it hurts your heart so much, i can suggest islamic channels who can bring you peace of mind if you have the courage to question them on their live stream. And what human rights has been denied to the lgbt community, when did sodomy become a human right, you would not be here if your parents practised sodomy. The existence of the community is based on people who did not practice sodomy. i am sure you love animals too, when is the wedding mate or would you deny them their rights.
Thanks
Many thanks Ali!
@@BloggingTheology Alot of Non-Muslims especially Christians and Atheists say that in Islam if a woman is raped and there are No 4 witnesses then the Rapist will go Scot free and the women will be punished,some of them have a misunderstanding about the difference between the Punishment of Death which requires 4 witnesses and the difference between any other Punishment in which the 4 witnesses are NOT required, suppose like 10 years prison etc,even alot of Muslims don't know this and they get trapped easily by this from Non-Muslims......If there are circumstantial evidences and in addition medical evidence then the Qadi Judge can give anyother punishment to the Rapist except the Death Penalty,and the woman will go free because she's innocent and was a victim,now read the evidence for this from the great Scholars of Islam and Hadiths,Imam Malik (may Allah have mercy on him) said:
“In our view the man who rapes a woman, whether she is a virgin or not, if she is a free woman he must pay a “dowry” like that of her peers, and if she is a slave he must pay whatever has been detracted from her value. The punishment is to be carried out on the rapist and there is no punishment for the woman who has been raped, whatever the case.” (Al-Muwatta, 2/734)
Ibn ‘Abd al-Barr (may Allah have mercy on him) said:
“The scholars are unanimously agreed that the rapist is to be subjected to the hadd punishment if there is clear evidence against him that he deserves the hadd punishment, or if he admits to that. Otherwise, he is to be punished (i.e., if there is no proof that the hadd punishment for zina may be carried out against him because he does not confess, and there are not four witnesses, then the judge may punish him and stipulate a punishment that will deter him and others like him). There is no punishment for the woman if it is true that he forced her and overpowered her, which may be proven by her screaming and shouting for help.” (Al-Istidhkaar, 7/146)
Salaam brother Paul, I've been hooked on your videos. Thank you soo much for sharing your knowledge and discussions with us, I feel so inspired by these discussions I now want to be a scholar 🙂
Great topic. Thank you to both the host and invited speaker for all your effort and making your article/knowledge available to us.
Glad you enjoyed it!
Brother Paul you're a blessing I was just thinking about this topic and didn't want to dig too much fearing I'd find false information. I'm so thankful for you may Allah reward you for all your work.💜
God allowed Muslims to take captives only in wars-and that too under complex rules which included that prisoners of war must be treated gently, and must be fed the same foods his captors ate, must be clothed in the same fabric, and lodged in a similar housing. And it drastically restricted war, by allowing enslavement only in a war fought against unbelieving and unjust enemy. In no other way could anyone be enslaved. At the same time, Islam raised the status of slavery to that of a free man; and opened many ways for their emancipation. In Islam, no one was permitted to have sexual relations with their slaves. However, in countries throughout Europe, North America and Australia, it was a commonplace occurrence and also sanctioned by government laws to sexually assault their slaves, especially the women, which was practiced in a mass scale and completely legal until a few decades ago.
@@Faith-in-the-One thank you. I wondered about concubines as someone said Prophet Mohammad peace be upon him had many. But I don't believe this.
@@jennydbeme it is said that Maria the Coptic was a concubine of the Christian king of Alexandria in Egypt, and was sent among other gifts to Prophet Muhammad pbuh, as a reply to Prophet Muhammad's pbuh letter calling the king to Islam. Prophet Muhammad put her among the status of his wives, she beared for him his son Ibrahim who died around the age of two, prophet Muhammad was heartbroken but practiced patience for the sake of Allah!!! He treated Mariah so dearly that some of his wives were said to be jealous of, anyway Allah knows best, and we have to follow the example of our prophet in any situation that others might not agree with, as we should never say that we know or could be more passionate or just than Allah and the prophet!!!
so does your female slave have to consent to sex?
@@Faith-in-the-One please explain this hadith to me:
Narrated Ibn Muhairiz: I saw Abu Said and asked him about coitus interruptus. Abu Said said, "We went with Allah's Apostle, in the Ghazwa of Barli Al-Mustaliq and we captured some of the 'Arabs as captives, and the long separation from our wives was pressing us hard and we wanted to practice coitus interruptus. We asked Allah's Apostle (whether it was permissible). He said, "It is better for you not to do so. No soul, (that which Allah has) destined to exist, up to the Day of Resurrection, but will definitely come, into existence." (Book #46, Hadith #718)
Thank you brother Paul, thank you brother Justin. May Allah bless you both.
This was a breath of fresh air. I had been seeing so many comments and posts by muslims arguing for slavery and insisting there is nothing islamically, ethically wrong with it but rather only those with liberal values would be against it. It was so painful to think that there are muslims advocating for such oppression in the name of the prophet and God instead of seeing that the prophet pbuh established an ethical trajectory towards abolishment of slavery.
It is morally good in the context of war, it wouldn't be abolished permanently as a war could happen, but why you found it painful wasn't because you have some moral truth in you, but its literally because as is done in every damn culture and century, the dominant ethic has conditioned you into its made up commitments, and so your intuition is tailored with what is indicated to me to have the disgusts and acceptance of a liberal, so what makes some right or wrong is linked to those false values, this is like when a racist Muslim suffers doubts because the dominant ethic at his time commands that blacks should be treated under whites but the Quran and Sunnah say otherwise so he gets disturbed and seeks a justification that suits his racist values and becomes relieved when anything shows a sign interptable to that, I shouldn't be so harsh, but I'm sick of Muslims not doubting these diseased ideas that they are so readily ideaolgically molested into submission, just ask yourself this, why is non consensual harm wrong, why is undesirability wrong, where am I getting these ideas of right and wrong, does it necessitate that just because something has no harm its good or because some country is tech savvy its morally better than those without or that a country with more wealth is more moral, why, I reject this all and I find it all irrelevant to moral judgement rather I want my disgusts and acceptance tailored to Islam and I want to get angry when someone mischarterises Islam, but I find most Muslims are just relieved that Islam can fit into liberalism and are only angry at those who object to that, isn't that pathetic
alhamdulillah, this is excellent and important educational work!! thanks very much to both of you Paul & Justin. May Allah ta'Ala bless you abundantly and provide you with prosperity and well-being!
Glad you enjoyed it
@@BloggingTheology Shirk was ubiquitous but Mohmad said it is no more to be practised... Why didn't Mohamd say, "No more slavery."?
@@BloggingTheologyIf I were God I would abolish slavery.
@@HamdanHafeez-sm4wqwould you abolish employment?
I'm saving this for after I'm done with my MCAT on the 13th InshaAllah.
“Rape is haram in Islam…and abusing slaves is haram in Islam.” (Thanks for teaching us this message that many ignorant people of today have not yet studied thoroughly, while many unkempt men practice misogyny, concubinage, or mistresses-popular in Western and bad Islamic cultures)-what Trump does, for example.
Many do not know where this line comes from: “If a man sells his daughter to be a female slave, she shall not go out as the male slaves do.” (Holy Bible, Exodus 21:7).
Exodus 21:20, Bible (NKJV version): “And if a man beats his male or female servant with a rod, (which his-story has actually done)-so that he dies under his hand, he shall surely be punished…non withstanding if he remains alive a day or two, he shall NOT be punished; for he is his property.” (What justice is that-misogyny at best, tyranny at worst). People think these lines are in Quran, Astaghfirullah!
Deuteronomy 22:21, [Why would a Benevolent and Merciful God of Authenticity ever show only a man’s lustful point of view, while telling the people that rape marriage can ever be legitimized? Beyond my logic.
“…And she shall be his wife; he cannot divorce her all of his days.” (God forbid)….”But if the thing is true, and evidences of virginity are not found for the young woman, they shall bring out the young woman to the door of her father’s house, and the MEN of the city shall STONE her to death with STONES.” (Astaghfirullah-which conflicted people place blame on our Faith, instead of studying their own scriptures that are inherently misogynistic)-which conflicted Muslims, even, who know little about the Mercy of Allah in the Quran, May have also ignorantly followed.
Whereas, Sura Balad and other Suras teach thinkers to free slaves, to have free will, and to choose between two “highways” or pathways of being.
Bad Muslims are many. So are misogynists of ignorance everywhere, yet several Western nations now do what Allah has taught in Quran: equal treatment for all people across hierarchies.
Thank you for this important talk, Brothers. Stalking is also forbidden as is spying on people in the Quran since Allah teaches people to practice trust and good faith between religious or non-religious traditions.
Sura 49:12, “O you who believe! Avoid suspicion as much as possible…and spy not on each other, nor speak I’ll of each other behind their backs. Would any of you like to eat the flesh of your brother?”
Sura 90:7-14, “Does man think that none beholds him? Have we not made him a pair of eyes? And a tongue, and a pair of lips?//And shown him the two highways?//But he has made no haste on the path that is steep. And what will explain to you the path that is steep?//It is FREEING the bondman; or the giving of food in a day of privation//to the orphan with claims of relationship…”
Sura TableSpread 5:89, “Allah will not call you to account for what is futile in your oaths, but will call you to account for your deliberate oaths; for expiation, feed ten indigent persons, on a scale of the average for the food of your families; or clothe them; or GIVE A SLAVE his FREEDOM.”
“If you disagree about it, don’t lie about it,” says Brother Paul. (Absolutely-why do people lie and make up stupid stories about Muslims and Islam)?
Ghulam Sarwar, Islam: Beliefs and Teachings: “Islam strictly forbids any sexual relationship outside of marriage; There is no such thing as as mistress in Islamic society…Having more than one (legal) wife is better and more dignified than having a number of mistresses. Islam holds you responsible for your actions….Polyandry is forbidden in Islam.” {One thinks of the large number of mass shooters who come from severely neglected and abused homes without any inkling of a consistent father figure in the broken home, supposedly once made of “passion” or “love” (lust in today’s lingo, God forbid/Astaghfirullah).
Again, thank you for this important knowledge.
Correction: “ill” instead of “I’ll” (misspelling)
Collection
Sahih Muslim
In-book reference
Book 17, Hadith 41
Reference
Hadith 1456a
USC-MSA web (English) reference
Book 8, Hadith 3432
Related Qur'an verses
4.24
Abu Sa'id al-Khudri (Allah her pleased with him) reported that at the Battle of Hanain Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) sent an army to Autas and encountered the enemy and fought with them. Having overcome them and taken them captives, the Companions of Allah's Messenger (may peace te upon him) seemed to refrain from having intercourse with captive women because of their husbands being polytheists. Then Allah, Most High, sent down regarding that:
" And women already married, except those whom your right hands possess (iv. 24)" (i. e. they were lawful for them when their 'Idda period came to an end).
It was the famous “ Slave Dynasty “ in India that ruled for 200-250 years that was originated from slaves. As a matter of fact this was the only Muslim dynasty in all Muslim history (outside rashidoon) that was not a monarchy and selected on principles of democracy.
May Allah reward Justin for dissecting such a controversial topic; great content as per usual 🤲🏾
islamic writers or scholars claim that these non muslim women prisoners of war were distributed among the muslim soldiers for their safety or to save their lives or to provide for their sustenance. so it is humanity. but their claim is completely false and unreasonable. because if you see those authentic hadiths, you will understand that they avoid the main points by making tricks. reasons firstly, Azl (birth control method) is applied to these women according to the hadith, so that they can not become mothers of children. because if the child is born, she can not be sold or ransomed by returning her to her family. at the same time, companions used to have intercourse with them and perform Azl (birth control). So that they can be sold to another person or to their family to collect ransom after used. what kind of morality it of religion. i tried to explain the hadiths in brief. secondly, if it is for the safety of women prisoners of war then why are they separated from their husbands after being captured. according to shafi'i and maliki law their marriage will be dissolved. because it is in authentic hadith. (very clear here for the purpose of distinction). opinion first of all, now think if someone wants to capture your sister and release her with a ransom.
secondly dy doing azl(birth control) if sold to another person after intercourse. thus she is repeatedly sold to different men (after the end of a certain period). now think how much the repeated selling can add to the emotional pain of a woman. physical pain is more terrible. thirdly, her right to be a mother has been destroyed by(azl) birth control.
If that seems fair to you. then there is nothing more to say. injustice has been done here...with these hadiths later the Imams of for school(Madhhab)made laws..as a result of which this tyranny continues till the ottoman period. allah is fully responsible for this. allah could have provided them with permanent security during the time of the companions if he willed.
From the past 2 days i was struggling with this, to the point that i was questioning my beliefs.May Allah reward you both brother Paul and brother Justin in this life and in the hereafter as well
Really ,many people struggle with this topic because they have Not knowlesge about History,different civilsation and different topics in Islam.
@@darksheikh because ulema always justify what was done in the past. I watch videos of concubinage and huri (spouses) in jannah and they give examples of verses in Quran, thus justifying this way. As a woman, it is hard to understand why would islam allow slave women to be used as an object while men also have wifes. And since most ulema are men, they belittle our concerns as women and they sey "do you question Allah's orders? That is what he ordered so stop whining" These topics cause lots of women to question islam unfortunately.
@@rumeysa4686 Are you muslim? Did you listen to this podcast?
@@محمدبريداوي yes, I am elhamdulillah but I still have questions and I can't find answers to those questions. Me and my friend actually have been trying to find answers for 3 years but everyone says the same things they don't understand our question exactly. If I can't find the answer I will stop searching and try to forget it. I will do as the ulema say. Not because they say it but because Allah is the most just, most merciful and I trust Allah's judgement. Bu ı fear for my friend because she can't just forget it she keeps thinking about this.
@@rumeysa4686 you have problems with this because you are comparing the times we are living in with those times. The situations and environments and the attitude of people are very different from now. They perceived things in other way.
I'll give you an example. Many people in the West would say that hitting a child is abuse. People who have been never hit would get shocked by witnessing someone being hit. I have been hit by parents, but also teachers in the mosque. But I don't consider it to be abuse necesserily. As a matter a fact the teacher who impressed me the most in a positive way was a teacher who taught me religion in the mosque. And not the teachers in public school who didn't hit. I consider this teacher one of the kindest teachers I had in my life even when he has hit me several times because i didn't learn my homework well. I knew he didn't to abuse but to motivate us to do our best.
Things you would think is abuse will be experienced in a different way by people who are used too certain things in life. It is all about how people treat each other and what the intentions are of a person who has power over another person.
Jazakallah khair to both of these gentlemen.
Thanks for another phenomenal video, Paul. I look forward along with our other companions here to your future meetings with esteemed, knowledgeable, and most importantly friendly academics regarding our beloved Islam.
34:40 He is trying to find the Hadith?
Its this one:
حَدَّثَنِي بِشْرُ بْنُ مَرْحُومٍ، حَدَّثَنَا يَحْيَى بْنُ سُلَيْمٍ، عَنْ إِسْمَاعِيلَ بْنِ أُمَيَّةَ، عَنْ سَعِيدِ بْنِ أَبِي سَعِيدٍ، عَنْ أَبِي هُرَيْرَةَ رضى الله عنه
عَنِ النَّبِيِّ صلى الله عليه وسلم قَالَ
" قَالَ اللَّهُ ثَلاَثَةٌ أَنَا خَصْمُهُمْ يَوْمَ الْقِيَامَةِ، رَجُلٌ أَعْطَى بِي ثُمَّ غَدَرَ، وَرَجُلٌ بَاعَ حُرًّا فَأَكَلَ ثَمَنَهُ، وَرَجُلٌ اسْتَأْجَرَ أَجِيرًا فَاسْتَوْفَى مِنْهُ، وَلَمْ يُعْطِ أَجْرَهُ ".
Narrated Abu Huraira:
The Prophet (ﷺ) said,
"Allah says, 'I will be against three persons on the Day of Resurrection:
1. One who makes a covenant in My Name, but he proves treacherous.
2. One who sells a free person (as a slave) and eats the price,
3. And one who employs a laborer and gets the full work done by him but does not pay him his wages.' "
Sahih al-Bukhari 2227
Chapter 106: The sin of a person who sells a free man, Book 34: Sales and Trade
YEAH, it's a hadith Qudsi.
A hadith in which the prophet said that Allah said.
Collection
Sahih Muslim
In-book reference
Book 17, Hadith 41
Reference
Hadith 1456a
USC-MSA web (English) reference
Book 8, Hadith 3432
Related Qur'an verses
4.24
Abu Sa'id al-Khudri (Allah her pleased with him) reported that at the Battle of Hanain Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) sent an army to Autas and encountered the enemy and fought with them. Having overcome them and taken them captives, the Companions of Allah's Messenger (may peace te upon him) seemed to refrain from having intercourse with captive women because of their husbands being polytheists. Then Allah, Most High, sent down regarding that:
" And women already married, except those whom your right hands possess (iv. 24)" (i. e. they were lawful for them when their 'Idda period came to an end).
Hello Paul and Justin. Thank you both for this excellent information and very usefull for my study. A very very important topic. I have been searching for something similar on youtube for a while. Highly appreciated. Could you please shed light too on the so called Barbary "slave trade" which basically were prisoners of war (and not chattel slavery) and send back after ransom was paid. Back and forth people were captured in the mediterranean region, incl Balkan muslims by Italian Catholics. Somehow this is (still) being abused as "evidence", using orientalist art most of the time to back this up. Basically a projection of their own shortcomings. I really hope you could make time for this too.
According to that argument, the North African Muslims did not send slaving expeditions north to Europe with the specific intent to capture and sell slaves.
And according to that argument, the states of North Africa were in a state of war with Iceland. So they had a legitimate reason to capture Icelandic civilians and sell them in their slave markets.
That argument is on thin ice.
Hi Paul, there's also a lecture by Abdullah Al-Andalusi on this very topic which was detailed and informative.
Interesting!
title or link?
@@Thesandchief "How Islam abolished Pre-Islamic Slavery".
Despite not agreeing with everything he says creedally/politically, I must say that he nailed it on this one.
So to summarize: Islam came during a time when slavery was common (in a form different than what we associate with the slavery in the US that was based on abuse and racism) and when Islam came it's one of the things it came to reform and phased out by encouraging freeing slaves to earn a reward or to give them their freedom and facilitate their freedom over a period of time. In addition, no avenue for getting new slaves was available, so eventually slavery would be phased out of a society and economy completely without causing too much economic trouble for anyone evolved by forcing immediate changes on anyone. And then there's the treatment of slaves vs freemen: all were to be treated equally and none should be overburned and slaves were supposed to dress in the same way as the freemen and eat the same food they ate.
I think it's a very ethical way of dealing with a problem that's already there. Just because a religion mentions a thing you dislike doesn't mean it came and introduced it, sometimes it addresses a scenario that you might not be unfamiliar with but has happened in the past and might happen again the future. God is all-knowing, He teaches us how to deal with problems we encounter.
Those who are critical of Islam were yet again projecting their own history onto a different tradition.
Did he talk about the issue of consent?
@@freepalestinehaveagreatday6843 did he?
No, the history I acknowledge is the invasive, oppressive, enslaving genocidal history of muslims and Islam, from the balkans to West Africa and the shores of the Mediterranean and as far as Ireland. This your history, this is why you're despised.
Quran chapter 90
10. And we showed man the two highways (i. e. the difficult path of virtue vs the easy path of vice and rejection by Allah)
11. But man has not hastened on the "path that is steep"
12. And what do we mean by the "path that is steep"?
13. it is to free a slave
14. or give food to the hungry
15. to a related orphan
16.or to the indigent down in the dust
17. only then does he become a believer, and enjoins patience and enjoins deeds of kindness and compassion
Collection
Sahih Muslim
In-book reference
Book 17, Hadith 41
Reference
Hadith 1456a
USC-MSA web (English) reference
Book 8, Hadith 3432
Related Qur'an verses
4.24
Abu Sa'id al-Khudri (Allah her pleased with him) reported that at the Battle of Hanain Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) sent an army to Autas and encountered the enemy and fought with them. Having overcome them and taken them captives, the Companions of Allah's Messenger (may peace te upon him) seemed to refrain from having intercourse with captive women because of their husbands being polytheists. Then Allah, Most High, sent down regarding that:
" And women already married, except those whom your right hands possess (iv. 24)" (i. e. they were lawful for them when their 'Idda period came to an end).
Commenting before even watching brother Paul. Love all your videos! ❤️
There is still lots of underground slavery in the Arab states. You’d much rather have a legal status as a slave in the Islamic past than a paid foreign worker in Saudi Arabia or Dubai today.
One could make an easy argumemt that Global Western Capitalism has been defacto slavery. Sweatshops globally making products for pennies for Western consumers
@Alan
How did they treat you ?
Depends on which Islamic nation you are talking about.
Not even Arab countries, like in some west African countries. They treat their house helps like they are slaves. It is so depressing. It is so depressing
Salaam Paul and Justin.
Jazak’Allahu khairan for discussing this v sensitive topic in a such detailed and thorough manner.
Knowledge is power and you’ve managed to shut up the islamophobes.
Daniel Haqiqatjou continues to use this terminology and states that Forced Sex / "Rape" via "Sex Slaves" is permissible... as this is what Slavery means, and helps the population to expand etc.
I normally respect his views, but this is just so erroneous.
I've brought this up a few times, but he doubles down each time.
It would be worth having this conversation with him, as he has a number of skewed videos on this that gets many views.
So he probably agrees with the wesstern methods of slavvery.
Yh I don't think it's right for him to use the term sex slave instead of concubines but I think in terms of expanding the population, he was talking purely from an evolutionary standpoint
Sadly he is right. Owning a slave fully means she is yours for s3x- no consent required.
@wanderingstar5270 There is a difference between a female "slave" and Milk Yameen, which is initially declared.
A female "slave" can marry another slave.
And you have it completely wrong, owning a "slave" doesn't mean they become your property to do as you please. We all belong to Allah. Slave or no slave.
@@jagoman85 I didn’t say he could do as he pleases. Islam codified slavery and there were laws. But consent was not part of this code or law, so sex was lawful to him. There is nothing in Islam about seeking a slaves consent for sex.
If the female was a prisoner of war her marriage could be nullified and she can be owned and used for sex by her enslaver. But if she was married after being enslaved say to another slave then yes the owner could not have sex with her. But he could if she was single and it was his right as long as he fed and clothed her
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته، ،،thank you brother Paul.
Justin Parrott bases his teaching on this hadith, see p. 22.
‘Abd Allāh ibn Mas’ūd, “Whatever the Muslims view as good is good in the sight of Allah, and whatever they view as evil is evil in the sight of Allah." (Aḥmad ibn Ḥanbal, Musnad al-Imām Aḥmad ibn Ḥanbal (Beirut: Mu’assasat al-Risālah, 2001), 6:84, #3600; declared fair (ḥasan) by Al-Arnā’ūṭ in the comments.)
Do people in this group agree with this?
Pourquoi n'avez-vous pas parlé de Maria la copte ?
I find the argument that Islam set us on a course to abolish slavery a hard one to swallow.
If that was so, alcohol was also ubiquitous but it was outlawed pretty quickly. Why not the same with slavery?
True. It might be because slavery is part of human life in one or another.
For example, in WW1 German women turned to prostitution to support themselves because so many of their men died.
They would have been taken as slaves in the pre-industrial era. So which one would be preferable? Not only for women but for society as a whole?
There's also debt slavery.
Sometimes I think of how Western govt legalised prostitution in order to protect the prostitutes from abuse. Right now the world has millions of modern slaves in terms of debt and labor. So will govts legalise slavery in order to protect the rights of these slaves?
I don't know. I mean Islam has a full fledged system of laws and rules regarding slavery but the West never did which lead to chattel slavery.
Abolishing slavery uses at that time is the same thing that abolishing gasoline uses today.
It is in some ways harmful, but is it was a necessity and strongly implemented in the international global trade and economy.
We can't abolish gasoline right away, but we can find, explore and install limits and rights for decreasing the harm of it.
Same thing with slavery back then.
The prophet Muhammad is like an activist for ecology today, but applied to slavery.
You should remember that the first Muslims, the first people that followed Muhammad (sws) was the poorest people of Mecca including a lot of slaves.
As matter of fact, one reproach that the authorities Pagan of Mecca addressed to Muhammad (sws) is the fact that he urged slaves to stand up against their harsh conditions.
Slaves who became muslims also became less obedient to their tyrannical masters.
Yh it's not necessarily true but there is an argument for it
Very informative! Jazakallah guys!
Salam alaykum wa Rahmatullah brother Paul, jazakum Allah Khair to Justin. SubhanAllah I really appreciate the knowledge. 😊
Wa alaykumu s-salam
Wa Alaykum Salaam💚
@@johnnybravo6951 walaykum salam wa Rahmatullah.
Another great video from your channel, Paul ! Truly humbling to learn of the islamic principles of fiqh from such esteemed scholars. I have only had the good pleasure of reading one book by Dr Jonathan Brown (misquoting Muhammad) and I'll admit I found it a difficult read in some places, although after your recommendation i think i should like to look into his other works as well.
Thank you again ! May Allah bless you for your efforts.
Salaamun Alaikum
Humble academic background reader.
Thanks to both brothers.
Lol this was the most ridiculous apologetics for slavery. Muhammad never freed his slave
Narrated Abu Huraira:
Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said, "Whoever says, 'Subhan Allah wa bihamdihi,' one hundred times a day, will be forgiven all his sins even if they were as much as the foam of the sea.
Sahih al-Bukhari 6405
سبحان الله و بحمده سبحان الله العظیم
Just how authentic are these narrations..?? The evil Ummayad Dynasty founded by the scoundrel Muawiya fabricated countless absurd narrations and attributed these absurdities to our beloved Rasulullah..!!
@@mahnazbahaji2648
Collection
Sahih Muslim
In-book reference
Book 17, Hadith 41
Reference
Hadith 1456a
USC-MSA web (English) reference
Book 8, Hadith 3432
Related Qur'an verses
4.24
Abu Sa'id al-Khudri (Allah her pleased with him) reported that at the Battle of Hanain Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) sent an army to Autas and encountered the enemy and fought with them. Having overcome them and taken them captives, the Companions of Allah's Messenger (may peace te upon him) seemed to refrain from having intercourse with captive women because of their husbands being polytheists. Then Allah, Most High, sent down regarding that:
" And women already married, except those whom your right hands possess (iv. 24)" (i. e. they were lawful for them when their 'Idda period came to an end).
Remarkable suggestion Paul - change of the word “slave “. Much is always lost in translation. People always evaluate history from the lens of the existing era. Serious historians always disagree with this.
I do hope this material is translated especially into Urdu so that jurists and particularly government officials and members of parliament as well as the general public may educate themselves. Though concubines per se do not exist, so far as I know, other women are coerced by husbands, even other relatives, and a complete understanding is essential.
In Pakistan ? 😱
many people who are poorly versed in matters of Quran often cite a verses of the Quran to justify their false belief that unwed relationships with slaves is permitted in Islam. This assumption is unwarranted and completely baseless. Not a single verse in Quran mentions that unwed relationships with anyone, be they be free men or free women, prisoner men or prisoner women, is remotely permitted. The word “amah” which means female slave or the word “’abd” which means male slaves are not mentioned anywhere in the Quran as to legalize sexual reations with them. However, the word “malakat aimanukum” mentioned in several verses alongside the phrase “azwaaj” which means wife, according to some scholars the word “malakat aimanukum” meant “the female prisoners among your wives”. This verse was emphasizing the point that in order to marry a free woman, a man had to pay a certain amount of dowry to make sexual relation permissible with her, but in case of female prisoners, upon marriage and consummation of the union which could be ascertained with the birth of a child, the prisoner was pronounced to be free, and hence emancipation was considered the dowry and monetary gifts were not required. Marriage was freedom and freedom was dowry (in case of female prisoners).
Thank you Mr Williams and much thanks to your honorable gust Mr Parrott
Ma Sha Allah a great service. Jazakallahu Khaira.
Collection
Sahih Muslim
In-book reference
Book 17, Hadith 41
Reference
Hadith 1456a
USC-MSA web (English) reference
Book 8, Hadith 3432
Related Qur'an verses
4.24
Abu Sa'id al-Khudri (Allah her pleased with him) reported that at the Battle of Hanain Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) sent an army to Autas and encountered the enemy and fought with them. Having overcome them and taken them captives, the Companions of Allah's Messenger (may peace te upon him) seemed to refrain from having intercourse with captive women because of their husbands being polytheists. Then Allah, Most High, sent down regarding that:
" And women already married, except those whom your right hands possess (iv. 24)" (i. e. they were lawful for them when their 'Idda period came to an end).
اعظم جهاد بعد جهاد الحروب هو جهاد النفس خاصة في هذه الزمن نسأل الله العلي العظيم ان يثبتنا جميعا على طريق الحق
Thank you so much for highlighting the importance of how Islam portrays and advocates true honorable masculinity!
I knew ge would be here. I used to follow him on Twitter. He is the OG
Great video again! Glad you were trying to find an alternative for the word "slave", I suggest "custodee". May Allah bless both of you.
I knew the majority of this always good to hear of refresher while learning some key points a long the way. Islam is a system for all times and places and another thing about Islam, it's malleable. Core tenants are not but rulings change from period to period based on the circumstances of the people but the prophets way is the best way and this is why he is THEE role model for mankind.
Collection
Sahih Muslim
In-book reference
Book 17, Hadith 41
Reference
Hadith 1456a
USC-MSA web (English) reference
Book 8, Hadith 3432
Related Qur'an verses
4.24
Abu Sa'id al-Khudri (Allah her pleased with him) reported that at the Battle of Hanain Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) sent an army to Autas and encountered the enemy and fought with them. Having overcome them and taken them captives, the Companions of Allah's Messenger (may peace te upon him) seemed to refrain from having intercourse with captive women because of their husbands being polytheists. Then Allah, Most High, sent down regarding that:
" And women already married, except those whom your right hands possess (iv. 24)" (i. e. they were lawful for them when their 'Idda period came to an end).
Excellent, concise and pertinent conversation
ما ملكت ايمانكم The right hand is more honorable because the the righteous people will receive their record of deeds in the right hand
﴿سورة الـحاقـة﴾
١٩) فَأَمَّا مَنْ أُوتِيَ كِتَابَهُ بِيَمِينِهِ فَيَقُولُ هَاؤُمُ اقْرَءُوا كِتَابِيَهْ
٢٠) إِنِّي ظَنَنْتُ أَنِّي مُلَاقٍ حِسَابِيَهْ
٢١) فَهُوَ فِي عِيشَةٍ رَاضِيَةٍ
[Quran Chapter 69]
19. So as for he who is given his record in his right hand, he will say, "Here, read my record!
20. Indeed, I was certain that I would be meeting my account."
21. So he will be in a pleasant life -
Thank you very much for raising such a subject. It’s very informative and useful; especially these times where enemies of Islam use it to spread doubts about Islam, taking advantage of the ignorance of Muslims of this subject because it’s not currently practiced. The guest is knowledgeable and well-chosen. Thank you brother Paul.
Where have you been Paul? We really missed you man.
Alot of Non-Muslims especially Christians and Atheists say that in Islam if a woman is raped and there are No 4 witnesses then the Rapist will go Scot free and the women will be punished,some of them have a misunderstanding about the difference between the Punishment of Death which requires 4 witnesses and the difference between any other Punishment in which the 4 witnesses are NOT required, suppose like 10 years prison etc,even alot of Muslims don't know this and they get trapped easily by this from Non-Muslims......If there are circumstantial evidences and in addition medical evidence then the Qadi Judge can give anyother punishment to the Rapist except the Death Penalty,and the woman will go free because she's innocent and was a victim,now read the evidence for this from the great Scholars of Islam and Hadiths,Imam Malik (may Allah have mercy on him) said:
“In our view the man who rapes a woman, whether she is a virgin or not, if she is a free woman he must pay a “dowry” like that of her peers, and if she is a slave he must pay whatever has been detracted from her value. The punishment is to be carried out on the rapist and there is no punishment for the woman who has been raped, whatever the case.” (Al-Muwatta, 2/734)
Ibn ‘Abd al-Barr (may Allah have mercy on him) said:
“The scholars are unanimously agreed that the rapist is to be subjected to the hadd punishment if there is clear evidence against him that he deserves the hadd punishment, or if he admits to that. Otherwise, he is to be punished (i.e., if there is no proof that the hadd punishment for zina may be carried out against him because he does not confess, and there are not four witnesses, then the judge may punish him and stipulate a punishment that will deter him and others like him). There is no punishment for the woman if it is true that he forced her and overpowered her, which may be proven by her screaming and shouting for help.” (Al-Istidhkaar, 7/146)
Bukhari #2227 narrated the Qudsi Hadith:
{قال الله: ثلاثة أنا خصمهم يوم القيامة: رجل أعطى بي ثم غدر، ورجل باع حرا فأكل ثمنه، ورجل استأجر أجيرًا فاستوفى منه ولم يعطه أجره}
Allah said: (Three [people] I'll be their rival on the day of judgment: A man who gave [a promise] in my name then he betrayed, a man who sold a free person then consumed his bounty, and a man who sought a service from a service provider and received the service but denied the payment of the service)
There’s a book written by the late Dr Jerald F. Dirks ‘Muslims in American History’ it did cover about the African Muslims slaves that were brought to America, these slaves were highly educated equivalent to modern day Masters or phd level.
Brother Allah grant us more success Ameen ❤
a subject that needed to be addressed. good job.
2:30 why was the article not published after review?
TQ very much for the articles
Exactly. For the lack of a better term, "slave" is wrong to use in the Islamic history context. Sadly "server" or "servant" is not quite correctly describe it either.
But they were not paid and didn't have the right to leave when they want lol
They were owned
@@tororo76 prisoners in old america also work for free like railroad works, police plates, cleaning the prisons. Were they slaves? oh yeah "lol". "lol" will make my statements more credible.
@@alexferdinansyah757 I’m not sure why America always needs to come into it. If you are buying and selling humans and they are your legal property then that’s a slave. That’s what happened under Islam.
no they had the right ...there is something in islam called mukataba it's mentionned in the quran ...mukataba is a contract between the "slave" and the master where the "slave" can "buy" himself which means if a slave what to no more be a slave he can do a contract where he pay the master a some of money to be free and it's obligatory which means the master can't refuse ........second you said they were not paid and actually that's not true also bcs the prophet mohamed said that the master is obliged to feed him from what he eat and to clothes him from what he wears and to let them life in where they live so everything the master eat drink wear sleep is also for the slaves this an equivalent to payment@@tororo76
I recommend the lecture of Jonathan Brown on slavery and imam Omar Suleiman on this issue as well
May the God bless you and reward you both. May Allah grant you sincerity, devotion, and make you successful in this life and the hereafter.
The past was a often hard place and doesn't need us to agree with their norms.
True and Agreed
But Islam is for all times and places, that is the problem!
Present times also are even harder on Muslims
Assalamu alaykum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuh, brother Paul, I ask Allah to make it easy for you, bless you and help you always conbey the truth ameen
Dar-us-Salam reference
Hadith 2131
Ahmad Hasan translation
Hadith 2126
USC-MSA web (English) reference
Book 11, Hadith 2126
A man from the Ansar called Basrah said:
I married a virgin woman in her veil. When I entered upon her, I found her pregnant. (I mentioned this to the Prophet). The Prophet (ﷺ) said: She will get the dower, for you made her vagina lawful for you. The child will be your slave. When she has begotten (a child), flog her (according to the version of al-Hasan). The version of Ibn AbusSari has: You people, flog her, or said: inflict hard punishment on him. Abu Dawud said: This tradition has been transmitted by Qatadah from Sa'd b. Yazid on the authority of Ibn al-Musayyab in a similar way. This tradition has been narrated by Yahya b. Abi Kathir from Yazid b. Nu'aim from Sa'id b. al-Musayyab, and 'Ata al-Khurasani narrated it from Sa'id b. al-Musayyab ; they all narrated this tradition from the Prophet (ﷺ) omitting the link of the Companion (i.e. a mursal tradition). The version of Yahya b. Abi Kathir has: Basrah b. Aktham married a woman. The agreed version has: He made the child his servant.
حَدَّثَنَا مَخْلَدُ
Jazakallah khair
I have read Muhammad al Jibali’s books before. I have a question regarding the “the right hand possess” of a war captive woman. A married Muslim man is allowed to “own” this captive woman and have sex with her. This seems to contradict how strict Islam is with Zinna/sex outside of marriage. Would a married Muslim woman be able to have sex with a war captive man she owns? If she cannot, this does not seem fair or logical- this seems like a double standard. Please explain this matter.
I think that this matter should be revised.
Because it seems that the Quran indicates that u can't have sex.with a melek yamen unless u have a contract with her
A marriage like contract.
So if thats the case this would solve ur objection which I found very logical and I asked it to myself previously.
Evrth that he mentioned is according to the interpretation of Justin Parrot or consensual agreement of group of scholars?
Another amazing video with high level content
Two of my favorite intellectuals :)
Intellectuals ? Are you sick ?
I don't know how to find link Paul mentioned in it..
Jazkallah kahayrn for this interview. But I still wished you questioned him more about the injustices of the harem institution and about the tanzimat reforms which was based off of secular ideas. The Quran already have stated that it's best for a Muslim to free a slave than keeping them enslaved.And can you interview a scholar on the situation about the hagia sophia and the Orthodox Christians inshallah
thank u for not blaming islam but blaming the ppl who did the wrong doing
Essalam alaiukom brothers . Thank you for the interesting topic and jazaka Allah khayran for defending the Islam's reputations
Alot of Non-Muslims especially Christians and Atheists say that in Islam if a woman is raped and there are No 4 witnesses then the Rapist will go Scot free and the women will be punished,some of them have a misunderstanding about the difference between the Punishment of Death which requires 4 witnesses and the difference between any other Punishment in which the 4 witnesses are NOT required, suppose like 10 years prison etc,even alot of Muslims don't know this and they get trapped easily by this from Non-Muslims......If there are circumstantial evidences and in addition medical evidence then the Qadi Judge can give anyother punishment to the Rapist except the Death Penalty,and the woman will go free because she's innocent and was a victim,now read the evidence for this from the great Scholars of Islam and Hadiths,Imam Malik (may Allah have mercy on him) said:
“In our view the man who rapes a woman, whether she is a virgin or not, if she is a free woman he must pay a “dowry” like that of her peers, and if she is a slave he must pay whatever has been detracted from her value. The punishment is to be carried out on the rapist and there is no punishment for the woman who has been raped, whatever the case.” (Al-Muwatta, 2/734)
Ibn ‘Abd al-Barr (may Allah have mercy on him) said:
“The scholars are unanimously agreed that the rapist is to be subjected to the hadd punishment if there is clear evidence against him that he deserves the hadd punishment, or if he admits to that. Otherwise, he is to be punished (i.e., if there is no proof that the hadd punishment for zina may be carried out against him because he does not confess, and there are not four witnesses, then the judge may punish him and stipulate a punishment that will deter him and others like him). There is no punishment for the woman if it is true that he forced her and overpowered her, which may be proven by her screaming and shouting for help.” (Al-Istidhkaar, 7/146)
I am also muslim. islamic writers or scholars claim that these non muslim women prisoners of war were distributed among the muslim soldiers for their safety or to save their lives or to provide for their sustenance. so it is humanity. but their claim is completely false and unreasonable. because if you see those authentic hadiths, you will understand that they avoid the main points by making tricks. reasons firstly, Azl (birth control method) is applied to these women according to the hadith, so that they can not become mothers of children. because if the child is born, she can not be sold or ransomed by returning her to her family. at the same time, companions used to have intercourse with them and perform Azl (birth control). So that they can be sold to another person or to their family to collect ransom after used. what kind of morality it of religion. i tried to explain the hadiths in brief. secondly, if it is for the safety of women prisoners of war then why are they separated from their husbands after being captured. according to shafi'i and maliki law their marriage will be dissolved. because it is in authentic hadith. (very clear here for the purpose of distinction). opinion first of all, now think if someone wants to capture your sister and release her with a ransom.
secondly dy doing azl(birth control) if sold to another person after intercourse. thus she is repeatedly sold to different men (after the end of a certain period). now think how much the repeated selling can add to the emotional pain of a woman. physical pain is more terrible. thirdly, her right to be a mother has been destroyed by(azl) birth control.
If that seems fair to you. then there is nothing more to say. injustice has been done here...with these hadiths later the Imams of for school(Madhhab)made laws..as a result of which this tyranny continues till the ottoman period. allah is fully responsible for this. allah could have provided them with permanent security during the time of the companions if he willed.
@@NRFP Please quote the Hadith which you are talking about with the full reference and Chapter and Hadith number!
@@hashimawan2433Bukhari 4138(book 64 hadith 182)or muslim 1438(book 16 hadith 146) please also study all hadith about it your self from bukhari & shahin muslim
@@NRFP I entered the Mosque and saw Abu Sa`id Al-Khudri and sat beside him and asked him about Al-Azl (i.e. coitus interruptus). Abu Sa`id said, "We went out with Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) for the Ghazwa of Banu Al-Mustaliq and we received captives from among the Arab captives and we desired women and celibacy became hard on us and we loved to do coitus interruptus. So when we intended to do coitus interrupt us, we said, 'How can we do coitus interruptus before asking Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) who is present among us?" We asked (him) about it and he said, 'It is better for you not to do so, for if any soul (till the Day of Resurrection) is predestined to exist, it will exist."
i have no intention of watching the entire video, for those who watched the video. are they justifying slavery (regardless of whether the owner is good to his slaves) and concubinage?
update: yeah theyre legit saying its okay, i hope they one day get to feel a fraction of what its like to be a slave
Would like more clarity on Concubines: I thought this is haram because in the Western meaning of the word this is like , 'living together' without marriage, so it is like, 'fornication' which is forbidden. So are we sure that these verses have not been misinterpretated ? I think Islam expects the marriage but the name of 'concunine' remained stuck inorder to distinguish the 'Prisoners of War' people from ordinary source.
It is clear that concubines were slav3s used for s3x outside of marriage because a law says if a concubine bears a child to her owner she is free when the owner dies. Clearly a wife is already a free woman.
The thing that handicaps us mentally as Muslims is that we presuppose that the derived laws are the laws of God, when clearly they are not. Now, the derived laws are of course useful and relevant in that it informs us about the historical engagement with the legal tradition and the way in which they sought to regulate their societies. However, not unlike modern legislation that is made and renewed constantly, that was true for Islamic law in the past as well and if you look closely in many Muslim countries is still true today. At one point the predominant view one Muslim country was that a woman needed her guardian to marry, but when so many guardians prohibit their daughters from every getting married and it resulted in a crisis in which most people are single, they tried to circumvent that an adopt a different legal opinion in which they then said that adult Muslim women don't require a guardian to get married. These things are dynamic and relative and we seldom see it that way.
That's the west trick , our laws in the middle East are not Islamic .
This Hadith settles it Abu Dharr reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Whoever is suitable for you among your slaves, feed them from the same food you eat and clothe them from the same clothes you wear. Whoever is not suitable for you, sell them and do not torture the creation of Allah.”
Source: Sunan Abī Dāwūd 5161
The US withdrew from the intermediate-range nuclear forces treaty on a whim 2years ago. On a WHIM .
The U.N. is already falling apart before our own eyes.
Even if tomorrow they make a peace deal. We see with our own eyes how they honor treaties.
All of the sudden there's a proxy war in Ukraine between largest un coutries!
They only make up laws for temporary convenience, Brag about how civilized they're , then break their own treaties even amongst themselves.
Today, the un, even us generals say that destroying the infrastructure, electricity water... Amount to warcrimes. Wait ! what about destroying infrastructure , electricity and water ... in Iraq? Oh sry i guess they don't count for "subhuman" "deser n" Iraqis.
Then these two hypocrites come and say islamic laws are abolished. Because the U.N. temporarily pretend to say so? These hypocrites are Just like their predecessor "the other paul (saul)" after his "encounter on the road to Damascus" , says laws are abolished "fullfilled...", says that gentiles and jews don't need to follow the law anymore.
China is using uhygurs like slaves in forced labor . even their own chinese is considered cheap labor compared to the west. The west is ok with it, as long as apple, hp , microsft... Continue to get their share of that "cheap work force". What do you think will happen if another proxy war happen in Taiwan? What do you think will happen if india also decides to also not share their cheap labor with the west? Western workforce will at first think they finally got their jobs back, All of the sudden minmum wage laws will be abandoned at the request of apple, ge , ms, ... Then all of the sudden it's inconvenient for them to work for cheap like that. Then all of the sudden abolish the "abolished salvery laws",... Just use different wording for it.
Humane Masks will drop off in a second due to any inconvenience, they have no principle they honor no treaties.
This is so true
Never forget what Allah said "But if you were to obey most of those on Earth, they would make you stray from the way of God. THEY FOLLOW NOTHING BUT ASSUMPTIONS, and they do nothing but make conjectures(Opinion based on incomplete information)
Qur'an Majeed 6.116
Western slavery was unique as it practiced this on an industrial level and formed the foundation of their modern economies like the US. Western slavery also targeted a specific race. The term SLAVERY carries the western baggage of racism and mass scale industrial colonialism. This did not exist on the same scale or in an ethnocentric way in the muslim world.
It is war captives, not slavery is Islam. There is a huge difference
Yes but most slayyves in araab societies were also blaq too. So it has a racial element.
@@sacredrider slaves were initially captured as prisoners of war, but became slaves as they remained property of the enslaver
Fantastic video for Tate and friends to watch.
Dar-us-Salam reference
Hadith 2131
Ahmad Hasan translation
Hadith 2126
USC-MSA web (English) reference
Book 11, Hadith 2126
A man from the Ansar called Basrah said:
I married a virgin woman in her veil. When I entered upon her, I found her pregnant. (I mentioned this to the Prophet). The Prophet (ﷺ) said: She will get the dower, for you made her vagina lawful for you. The child will be your slave. When she has begotten (a child), flog her (according to the version of al-Hasan). The version of Ibn AbusSari has: You people, flog her, or said: inflict hard punishment on him. Abu Dawud said: This tradition has been transmitted by Qatadah from Sa'd b. Yazid on the authority of Ibn al-Musayyab in a similar way. This tradition has been narrated by Yahya b. Abi Kathir from Yazid b. Nu'aim from Sa'id b. al-Musayyab, and 'Ata al-Khurasani narrated it from Sa'id b. al-Musayyab ; they all narrated this tradition from the Prophet (ﷺ) omitting the link of the Companion (i.e. a mursal tradition). The version of Yahya b. Abi Kathir has: Basrah b. Aktham married a woman. The agreed version has: He made the child his servant.
حَدَّثَنَا مَخْلَدُ
Can any muslim explain this hadith to me? I am having doubts about my deen.
عَنِ الشَّعْبِيِّ، قَالَ كَانَ جَرِيرٌ يُحَدِّثُ عَنِ النَّبِيِّ صلى الله عليه وسلم " إِذَا أَبَقَ الْعَبْدُ لَمْ تُقْبَلْ لَهُ صَلاَةٌ وَإِنْ مَاتَ مَاتَ كَافِرًا " . وَأَبَقَ غُلاَمٌ لِجَرِيرٍ فَأَخَذَهُ فَضَرَبَ عُنُقَهُ .
Jarir used to narrate from the Prophet (ﷺ) [ﷺ]:
"If a slave runs away, no Salah will be accepted from him, and if he dies he will die a disbeliever." A slave of Jarir's ran away, and he caught him and struck his neck (killing him).
Sahih (Darussalam)
Sunan an-Nasa'i, 4050
In-Book Reference: Book 37, Hadith 85
English Reference: Vol. 5, Book 37, Hadith 4055
Just read one of your replies to another commentar, and I concluded, you are not a Muslim.
Mashallah informative stream ♥👌
slavery
salaams. I am no scholar but have recently been reading and thinking of this and just wanted to offer some insight in case I may get some reward from Allah. I'd like to start with saying that the prophet Muhammad pbuh is the first person in recorded history to say that a black person is not greater than the white and that the white is not greater than the black, essentially human equality (see last sermon). In this context we understand that slavery in arabia was more of an economic class than situation one ethnicity experienced such as blacks in America. Even in the bible, book of Numbers chapters 31, Jews were encouraged to enslave virgin non-jewish women among their enemies for themselves. Unfortunately when the prophet hits the ground 1400 years ago, this slave class is rampant in the society (various forms existing worldwide actually) along with other major problems like alcohol. Getting rid of slavery and alcohol occured in stepwise fashion. If you try to ban such things over night without convincing people of the reasonings, you drive those practises further into darkness where it occurs with even less regulation as we saw with prohibition in the USA which led to underground alcohol production that blinded and killed people due to not using the correct ingredients (methyl alcohol). If slavery had been banned in one night we would've had human trafficking and people doing more to hide their slaves. How would you get rid of it? The muslim approach is to slow down getting new slaves, making conquering towns and turning everyone into slaves prohibited, and incentivizing freeing slaves. For example if you break an oath, you have to free a slave. If you have sex while fasting, you have to free a slave. Many sins require freeing a slave if possible. Also it is important that if slavery exists in a society, there should be rules for it. America had no rules so slaves had no rights. America had no problem going to Africa and turning people into slaves to create a working class, but that is not allowed in islam. Eventually even the prophet's wife Aisha said it was difficult to find a slave to free! Anywhere that islam is practised eventually you will dry up the slave class. Today human trafficking for sex worldwide and sweat shops in China and other places are modern slavery and there is no way out and no rights. In islam a slave had to eat from your food and dress from your clothes and they could make a contract with their owner to buy their freedom,in addition to freeing a slqve being seen as a huge good dead. Unfortunately enslaving people is something humans do and it is better to have to rules than not to limit human suffering until it can be abolished. Today slavery is illegal worldwide.
Masha Allah
Jazakallahu khairan brother
Insha Allah if I meet you one day i will give you a hug 🤗
Jazikillahukhairan brother Paul and brother Justin..a much needed discussion indeed .. brilliant 👍
🔴 Christians nowadays: *where is Muhammad in the Bible ?*
Definitely nobody
St. Jerome in his Letter 57.6-7: Time would fail me were I to unfold the testimonies of all who have translated only according to the sense... That secular and church writers should have adopted this line need not surprise us when we consider that the translators of the Septuagint, the evangelists, and the apostles, have done the same in dealing with the sacred writings. We read in Mark Mark 5:41 of the Lord saying Talitha cumi and it is immediately added “which is interpreted, Damsel, I say unto you, arise.” The evangelist may be charged with falsehood for having added the words “I say unto you” for the Hebrew is only “Damsel arise.”
23:34 I think Imam Tom Explained this better and he said it was refugee resettlement program called "Rik" because nomadic tribes after defeat were vulnerable to the dangers of robbery,prostitution etc.
Who’s imam Tom ?
Slavery could have been ended with one verse. The problem is, where would the slaves have gone? How would they've fed themselves. What about women slaves. Children? Old people? Quran set a gradual program of emancipation. 47-4 closed the door on new slaves. 24-33 provided deed of emancipation. 90-13 reads: free slaves, literally, take off their yokes; this verse came very early in Islam; following verses address potential needs of freed slaves. 4-92, 58-3, 5-89 made freeing of slaves the primary, if not the only, way for expiation of bigger sins. 9-60 opened state's treasury for freeing slaves.
So all mighty Allah has no better solution? When slavery ended in America the slaves became free and didn't move anywhere. Lots of them were given free lands and others were given lands and options to farm and buy the lands. Several towns and cities were created by those free slaves in America. Sorry, but your whole comment is absurd.
Allah sent a whole book of his FINAL words of moral answers to humans on how to treat each other without a single verse to stop slavery?
Not even a single verse to show his anger about humans owning their fellow humans as properties!
Yet, he sees it more important to add in this book the personal sexual conveniences of Muhammad!
In fact, Allah said he will not accept the prayers of any muslim slave that escapes from slavery!
عَنِ الشَّعْبِيِّ، قَالَ كَانَ جَرِيرٌ يُحَدِّثُ عَنِ النَّبِيِّ صلى الله عليه وسلم " إِذَا أَبَقَ الْعَبْدُ لَمْ تُقْبَلْ لَهُ صَلاَةٌ وَإِنْ مَاتَ مَاتَ كَافِرًا " . وَأَبَقَ غُلاَمٌ لِجَرِيرٍ فَأَخَذَهُ فَضَرَبَ عُنُقَهُ .
Jarir used to narrate from the Prophet (ﷺ) [ﷺ]:
"If a slave runs away, no Salah will be accepted from him, and if he dies he will die a disbeliever." A slave of Jarir's ran away, and he caught him and struck his neck (killing him).
Sahih (Darussalam)
Sunan an-Nasa'i, 4050
In-Book Reference: Book 37, Hadith 85
English Reference: Vol. 5, Book 37, Hadith 4055
@@azhaniaorgena6941 In USA, a slave was a property. Quran 4-25 says we are the same, slaves or otherwise. Emancipation order passed in 1863 but only for confederate held territory, and become the 13th amendment in 1865. Towns like Freedmen's Town in Houston and Nicodemus (Kansas) benefited from Homestead laws and were indeed remarkable achievements but today exist mainly as historical sites. Tuskegee's Syphilis study (1932-1972) was unethical human experimentation. Jim Crow laws existed till the 1960's, and de fact segregation and discrimination persisted in various forms. Americans had good intentions, but when dealing with inter-generational problems, a paced process of education and changing the mores is better, and that is what Quran undertook.
The Muslim tradition did not purge any books. So whatever traditions were passed along, have been report. The tradition you quoted is about a slave escaping to Mecca at the time of war when Meccans were non-believers. Even if the tradition is true, it represents what the narrator reported, it is not the word of God. As far as narrations go, there is narration Bukhari 6050 that slaves (actually Quran told us early on not to call them slaves) are our brothers and sisters and one must feed and clothe them the same way as one eats and dresses.
@@AbidNasim Slaves were properties too in the Umma. That's why Allah aka Muhammad said you can have sex with your slaves because you rightfully own them as shares from war. Muhammad bought and sold slaves.
Nowhere in the Quran does it stop or condemn slavery. It doesn't mention anywhere in the Quran about ending slavery gradually or in phases. Stop the cognitive dissonance.
Provide proof if you have them.
@@AbidNasim Don't care. You filth didn't care for the people before you enslaved them, you dont deserve apologetics and excuses now after the fact. Anti-humanity scum is what your kind are.
The term concubine is not exist in the Qur'an.The term in the Qur'an in arabic"ma meleket eymanukum" mostly translating in the meaning "concubine" in english. But it is not true translation as I knew. Its word by word translation is;"the person(female) who has got your words(oaths)" It means;The person you employ for a certain fee or commitment.İn my opinion,Maid/female servant instead of a concubine would be a more appropriate translation.
Exactly.
This whole issue should be revised and the terms should be redefined because the words have a very different meaning today
How do you translate the term “umm walad”?
@@wanderingstar5270 Umm:Mother Walad :Male Kid But if you're going to use it as a noun phrase ;the correct writing should be;"umm-ulwalad" and means;The Kid's mother. But I didn't understand why did you ask that! what does it have to do with
@@fatihmehmetkarabacak I was referring to the title given to a slave who bore a child to her owner.
Perhaps I misunderstood your comment but I understood you to mean that female slaves were never in the role of concubines. I was therefore asking about slaves who were in this position of concubine.
@@wanderingstar5270 I just said;"The term concubine is not exist in the Qur'an".I explained what the use of the term translated as Concubine in the Qur'an actually means.If someone is going to marry his servant, the Quran also shows ways to marry them.For example Quran 4/25;"And whoso is not able to afford to marry free(not servant), believing women, let them marry from the believing maids whom got your words/oaths". In the Qur'an, the subject of marrying a female servant (ma meleket eyman) or a slave woman (emet) is always used with "lawful marriage". You cannot find a usage area called sex slavery/concubine or sexual intercourse without lawful wedding in the Qur'an. All expressions regarding the sexual intercourse with a servant, a slave or a free person are used together with "lawful marriage". There is no verse in the Qur'an that allows you to have sexual intercourse with a slave or servant according to your own will.
tqvm for excellent topic 👍
Sheygh. Question: i was before in a long distance relationship with a morrocoon girl. She was from morrocco. I am from europe. She showed lots of enthousiasm to marry me. But when becoming fiancees then slowly i got more and more signals from her that having in the future sexual relationship is going to be a big mess, with lots of restrictions for happy and relax sexual intercourse. She suddenly start to put restictions like putting forth hadith about: if the woman does not like the sex,she cannot be forced for sexual intercourse. Or putting cloths between the two bodies with a hole for the sexual intercourse. By the way,i am empath and not a narcissist.
Question: did i do good for both of us by rejecting the future marriage because from the beginning she already started putting restrictions in the future sexual intercourse, even before marriage? Thank you for answering
If this was going to be an issue, then it's good that you broke it off. This would have caused issues down the line
If we refer to the "Masters" as the "Custodians" then I think it would be only appropriate if we refer to the "Slaves" as "Custodies". As I think Custody is a much better word and more closer to the Arabic "Ma Malakat Aymanukum" contextually.
This is a necessary topic to discuss 👍👌
love you both paul, go ahead dear💗
Very Important Video Jazakallah Khair