Multiple imputation in Stata®: Logistic regression

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 12

  • @brown4725
    @brown4725 6 років тому +2

    Hi! thanks for your video. What was your rational for choosing 20 imputation in the model. can you explain please.

  • @mariahlm9748
    @mariahlm9748 11 років тому +2

    Hi, thanks for the video. May You show another one about multivariate imputation which would be useful too. Thank you.

  • @jcortez2806
    @jcortez2806 5 місяців тому

    Thanks! Very helpful

  • @sainaveenbali
    @sainaveenbali 8 років тому

    let's say I imputed for unbalanced panel data. now in estimation which model to choose under panel data analysis : fixed or random or mle any test for that since hausman won't work in weighted/ imputed data. plz help thank in advance

  • @lesiba5382
    @lesiba5382 2 місяці тому

    Can we have a similar video but with survey data?

  • @nazeem8680
    @nazeem8680 3 роки тому

    What Does RVI and FMI stand for?

  • @pinktan100
    @pinktan100 11 років тому

    Hi! I have stata 10 and i need to impute my var. which command then i need to use. i dont have MI option in my stata menu. Should i use ice instead? In addition, could you pls suggest other way to consider missing values in reg.model other than imputation,Thanks!

  • @ene2082
    @ene2082 6 років тому

    How can I export the regression output into latex, please?

    • @annaan3613
      @annaan3613 4 роки тому

      estout
      esttab using file_name.tex

  • @junrancao3896
    @junrancao3896 5 років тому +1

    Does anyone know how to examine the imputed values?

    • @statacorp
      @statacorp  5 років тому +1

      You can use *mi xeq: summarize* to examine imputations. More generally, *mi xeq* executes commands on individual imputations; type 'help mi xeq' in Stata to learn more. There is also a community-contributed command that performs diagnostics for multiple imputations; type 'search midiagplots'.

    • @junrancao3896
      @junrancao3896 5 років тому +1

      @@statacorp I see. Thank you very much for such a comprehensive answer :)