KingTesticus I wish my old man would just do that. He's been trying those vapors smokers it sorta worked for awhile but we haven't had money for awhile and he's frankly just too thick headed to quit cold.
worst: 2017 when the first dog I have ever loved enough was hit by a car so much that he was paralysed best: 2017 when the vet told me he was just being melodramatic and nothing was wrong with him
Best year: 2015 Worst year: 2020 Thank you John Green, for writing amazing books and being so supportive of students and teachers everywhere! As someone who just finished being a student, and is about to be a teacher, I am grateful for your work. Best wishes, Clara Nims
Always. Genghis khan was probably the only guy to snort coke from a 100 girl's asses with each being a different ethnicity in a row, you never know with these Mongols.
In the face of cancer, you're still kicking ass at the entire idea of DFTBA. :) You deserve all the gold stars and high fives - and here's a virtual high five from me. Keep rockin' it!
Best Year: Literally anything other than 2020 I am stuck and home watching our special guest John Green for the next month (I do love john green tho) but also ah
Life expectancy was short because infant mortality rate was so high due to lack of knowledge in hygiene. Once people passed certain age, they actually lived relatively longer than what we thought. The skeleton findings prove this.
@@jcincorporated6207 other places were the same. Psalm 90 says "As for the days of our life, they contain seventy years, Or if due to strength, eighty years" And Isiah 23 says "Now in that day Tyre will be forgotten for seventy years like the days of one king. " There are other sources from other places too, but these are quickest examples to quote.
Of course my people, the Indians, Invented zero. "How much are we going to pay, sahid?" "Hold on" Draws a circle "...What is it?" "Nothing" "...How much is in it?" "Nothing" 'sniff' "It's beautiful!" 'sniff' If you get the reference you are awesome.
worst: 2016. was cheated on, kicked out of home, totaled my car, contacted bacterial meningitis, and became homeless. best: so far 2018. I have an amazing boyfriend, my mental illness is somewhat under control, I have a job that I think will lead to my career, and I'm pretty much fully independent. in short?? life gets better. just keep on living.
I actually find it interesting how the end of the dark ages and the beginning of the enlightenment in Europe coincided with the start of a regression in the Middle East, and how heavily intertwined both were.
+ahens74ah Except it wan't just Muslims. Throughout the dark ages Europe was constantly under siege; the Visigoths, the Vikings, the Eastern Empire, the Muslim Caliphates, the Mongols-the list goes on. Toward the end, that dynamic switched-the Muslim Caliphates were the ones under siege from Persians, Turks, Mongols, and Europeans. And in fact, it was knowledge brought back from the Caliphates during the Crusades that helped spark the intellectual awakening that became the Enlightenment.
+Daniel Ryan it did not end. It simply did not happen. The historians called this period of time dark because they find only very few evidences the life was going on. But Herbert Illig theory (this times never happened) seems right. Around 300 years was insert into the calendar.
+qd FATE Its one of those ironies of history. As utterly brutal and even pointless as the Crusades and the Mongol invasions of Europe where, the flow of knowledge, goods, and languages that both brought to Europe was undeniably a key contributor to the start of The Enlightenment.
This is crazy to learn right now here on this thread because I am reading The Fault in Our Stars right now, I am at about 50% in it, and I just started binge watching Crash Course World History last week. Mind blown
Excellent content! Thank you for putting together all of these... the histories of the Persian, European, and a bit of Chinese during the “Dark Ages.” I’ve been looking for something like this. I’ve always been interested in correlating time periods in history! Thank you very much!! It helps a lot in my lifelong journey in learning our world’s history!!
The dark ages weren't named "dark ages" because they were unenlightened, but because they didn't leave behind much written history, leaving historians "in the dark" about their civilizations.
Adelester The Dark Ages was a time where people lacked knowledge. Everything they were told they believed in and didn't question. The importance of the Age of Enlightenment, is it changes people's views of the world they knew. Without Enlightened ideas Feudalism and the strict absolute rule would have been around much longer. As peasants would not have question how unfair their lives were
Umm, no. Modern historians would object to the term Dark Ages to cover anything other than the first couple of hundred years following the fall of the Western Roman Empire in the 5th century. It is called dark because very little written documentation exists from that period. Starting with the Carolingian Renaissance in the 9th century, literacy and learning definitely started to spread again. Things were slowed down a bit by the Viking invasions (which actually played a major role in the development of Feudalism), but after the end of the Viking Age (1066 is a good end point), things started to develop pretty rapidly. The 12th century would see the development of Universities leading to a whole bunch of important philosophers (Albertus Magnus, Thomas Aquinas, Duns Scotus and William of Ockham among others showing up in the 13th. Also, the 14th century (still part of the Middle Ages which essentially would end with the the 15th century) saw peasant revolts. And actually absolute rule was not a Medieval thing; Feudalism was a relationship of mutual obligations; obviously the military classes took advantages of it, but the Peasants in that era had rights. In addition, following the Black Death in the 14th century, the system started breaking down because following the Black Death, the power of the peasants grew in direct proportion to how many fewer of them there were. Absolutism actually came with the Protestant Reformation and the Enlightenment were for the first time the princes and emperors of Europe no longer had to worry about answering to the Pope.
As a History teacher, I enjoy watching these courses and how simply they are explained. However, most of my students complain about them due to the rapid speech. Is there any way you could slow it down a bit in order to allow for deeper understanding?
Best year and worst year= 2019. Mom and Best Friend died. BUT I also branched out, fixed my bulimia, made friends, and learned what it was to smile because I wanted to (not because it was expected to make them family look better or make someone else happy).
You might say endless because angels are not from a physical form rather a spiritual form so no matter how many angel fit inside the head of a needle it is still have enough room for more angels to fit Just like faith it is endless
Speaking of prejudices like "Eurocentrism", the example he holds up as a typical theological debate owes its origins to the anti-religious, anti-clerical prejudicies of the so-called 'Enlightenment': medieval theologians/philosophers NEVER debated how many angels could dance on the head of a pin, that was made up by one of their critics to make fun of them.
And there was a renaissance called "Carolingian Renaissance," where universities were built and standardized writing with Carolingian Miniscule. Then, Charles' stupid sons managed to ruin it all.
***** Well, any presentation that tries to cover all of the "dark ages" in such a short time is going to gloss over a lot -- especially because despite the common prejudice, those ages were not really 'dark'. But I have to agree that there were several things he could have talked about less in order to spend more time on 1) the Carolingian Renaissance and 2) the Roman Empire in the East, which avoided most of this 'darkness'.
Huss S About the Arabic empire in the Middle Ages. It's not like people are criticising Islam 1000 years ago, and the Islamic world today is a total mess.
Fakey Directly because of western imperialism trying so vehemently to force democracy on people that DONT WANT IT. But intervention from the west is caused mostly by the desire to continue their extortion and oppression of the Middle East. Gaddafi for example wanted a pan African gold dinar currency for trading, which would topple the west's economic dominance of Africa and finally liberate the continent from western influence. America and NATO didn't like that, and they funded terrorists to destroy the greatest country in Africa. Sad really, how the West used the knowledge of the east i.e. Gunpowder to imprison us in impoverishment. As of now, Russia is the last bastion against the influence of the west.
Fakey Not imperial, imperialist, those are two different things. Russia is way more imperialist than the US? Are you joking? The US has over 600 military bases outside of the US, and Russia has only about 2 or 3. The US has WMDs pointed straight at russia and moscow in eastern europe. I've already explained this, the US seeks to indirectly control the economy of any place it can, and as I said, when Gaddafi proposed an idea that would dismantle America's extortion of Africa, they funded radical and savage Islamist to destroy the greatest country on the continent. That isn't globalist, that is intensely imperialist. The US wants to control the African and middle eastern economy, not guide it. "Islam with it's lack of personal freedoms " What lack of personal freedoms? This has nothing to do with personal freedoms. The middle east is a shithole strictly because of western imperialism. Jesus christ, westerners with their overly biased view of the world. Absolutely disgusting.
***** No one needs to hear it, it's obvious from their actions. Example: Gaddafi was planning on a pan african gold dinar currency that would topple western banking in Africa. Soon after, US funded terrorists destroyed Libya and savagely murdered Gaddafi. I wish I could see every american behind the libyan terrorists murdered just like Gaddafi was, slowly, while begging for mercy.
I watched this, and then did a project on the Golden Age of Islam / Islamic Golden Age in school. So thank you for showing me such an interesting side to the Middle Ages.
Maybe it's just because I really enjoy medieval European history but I find John Green's outlook here a bit bothersome. It seems like many people, in an attempt to avoid euro-centrism he is rather dismissive of Europe in general(including poetry although he does mention a few notable European theologians from that period). He chooses instead to speak incredibly positively regarding Muslim culture, which really could have used a more balanced approach. I understand time is limited, but I feel like this video should have been divided into a few parts, one for the Muslim world of the middle ages, another for Europe.
That's interesting. Since i enjoy medieval European history as well, I extra much enjoyed this particular episode specifically because it went into different directions. I had no idea what China was like in those centuries; this was a great, fresh, new perspective that made my day.
Unfortunately its hard to find good documentaries/books on china, other than the ones meant for PHD's. actually, it's hard to find any history documentary, what with the history channel as it is.
I too felt this was a tad dismissive. There are many dark ages in world history, but the period between the fall of the Western Empire and say the Norman invasion of England, generally known as The Dark Ages, is the title so, yeah, weak. He made the feudal system sound benevolent, as though lords didn't use their knights against peasants, other lords or their king constantly. Not to mention the threat of constant invasion by tribes displaced by the Huns or over-population, or just because you're a Viking and that's what you do! (Where are the Vikings in this show?!) For the the Romanized peoples of Europe, the withdrawal of the legions and ensuing chaos WAS the end of the world -- exactly the level of social breakdown that "preppers" build bunkers for. Yes, do talk about the accomplishments of the Arab world at this time, they carried the torch of civilization (maybe devote an episode to it, deserves one) but talk about China in an episode on, say, China. I'd also add that The Black Plague, while obviously not a great time, was key in dismantling the feudal system and in setting the stage for Europe's social, economic, artistic and scientific rebirth. The episode about the Crusades didn't talk about China. It was about the Crusades. If you want "Stuff that happened in the world between 500 AD/CE and 1400" call the episode that. There are so many brilliant tacks one could take on this both destructive and formative moment in history, this seemed like an intellectual cop-out. I thought, maybe all he'd say was 'the Dark Ages weren't so dark', but benevolent feudal rule? Guess he forgot to be awesome that day.
+Matthew Hardcastle You can always say 'so far'. I'm only 20, and so far my worst year was 2012 and my best year is 2016. That will probably change with time, but with my current experience, that's what it is.
We're Europe! The Prime Meridian runs through us, we're in the middle of every map, and we get to be a continent even though we're... not a continent! Watch in 0.5 speed!
2016: When I got straight A's in my A levels and had a great year all around, making many new friends and enjoying my courses 2017: When I stopped enjoying my courses, they became substantially more difficult, one of my friends killed himself and my mental health rapidly deteriorated btw congrats on graduating and beating your depression - two significant achievements
Worst year 2015 (started smoking, brother left for college, depression) Best year 2018 (second and third semester at college, met my girlfriend, started the shamefully long process of quitting smoking)
susan kakakhel No problem. In case you're still having trouble, she was born in 1997 meaning she's 20 years old right now. Her favourite year was 2001 because Shrek, her favourite movie, was released.
@Marco Hubrão Capitalism is the privatisation of a countries trade and industry for the profit of the individual. This can in no way apply to most of human history. And about ibn khaldun. He also came up with(or probaply did since there were other scholars who also knew of this idea like ibn tamiyyah) the idea of supply and demand which is essential to capitalism. So he invented crucial parts of capitalism, but not the idea itself.
@@al-muwaffaq341 He is talking about ibn khaldun, a tunisian historian who is considered the forerunner of modern day disciplines of economics, demography & sociology. He also invented supply economics(as the guy above explained).
The dark ages are one of my favorite periods in world history. The weaponry advanced at a very amazing speed, and the battles were absolutely amazing, for example, Lechfeld
Daaloul Chiheb Ummm, that was a myth actually. Medieval Church tend to frown on Witch Burning since it's pagan culture. Well, Monks do research on science but tend towards sheep breeding and clock making.
"The Dark Ages weren't a time of great poetry" Beowulf, the Arthurian Legends, the Song of Roland, the Tales of Alexander the Great, the Divine Comedy, the Canterbury Tales, etc.: Are we a joke to you?
@@hallamhal Yes, but the "historian" in this video does not realize that the "Dark Ages" designation only used to refer to the period between 500 and 1000, so when he uses it, he is also referring to the 14th and 15th centuries.
Interesting. To gloss over the great migration and the fact that in most cases the dark ages is referring to not the whole of the middle ages but only the first half till about the year 1000.
Abbasids are descendants of the uncle of the prophet, his name is Abbas bin Abdel Motaleb and are Arabs Your videos are unbelievably informative I love your style man
I bet the history books in China are not eurocentric. History is written from the perspective of the writer, which is the best and most honest way to record history.
Thanks for putting a different perspective in an otherwise euro centric definition of Middle Ages. Also, I like the point regarding Religion and Science. I don't see why people think the two can't coexist together.
I feel like people really missed the point of this video. Rather than sitting down and ranting about how the Europeans had some nice poetry and were starting to re-embrace science, he decided to show people that East was flourishing quite well at the time - and that other two major powers in the world at the time actually existed, and should not be glazed over as they so often are. He's made videos about Rome where he never once mentions Carthage, yet people don't complain about that (much). Yet when he makes a video about a time period, people go insane that he doesn't mention that the Europeans were paving the way to their enlightenment era while the rest of the Eurasian world happily continued on with theirs.
***** He dedicates at minimum a twelfth of this video to the discussion of European feudalism. He mentions that Europe in this time saw theologians rising, with his major examples being Thomas Aquinas and Saint Hildegard. He isn't saying Europe sucked - he consistently says that the Dark Ages in contemporary views are quite Eurocentric, which they are, but beyond that all he's saying is that the little goods Europe saw were overshadowed by the goods outside of it.
I, for one, didn't miss the point of the video. I just think the title is misleading. "The Dark Ages" refers to a period in the history of Europe. Interesting though it was, John's content dealt, not with the Dark Ages, but with things happening contemporaneously with the Dark Ages. If John was going to focus so little on Europe, he shouldn't have named the video after a period in European history.
worst 2008 I was violently bullied best 2011 started a new school, was actually challenged mentally, made cool new friends, discovered my passion for theatre.
Cramming 1000 years of the entire world's history into a 12 minute video doesn't do any region's history justice. The "Dark Ages" commonly refer to Europe's early Medieval period, and there's enough there to fill a video. I get the point about western history education being Eurocentric, but that warrants a side note, it doesn't warrant going off-topic for 2/3 of the video.
+Flying Spectacles I can't relate to any comment LESS. Just reading the words "high school" puts an anxious pit in my chest that spirals into an existential crisis where I have to reconcile my morality and feelings of responsibility to my family with my overwhelming urge to cause suffering to people who have wronged me and a sincere desire to die. It helps to talk though.
best: 2004 because i was born and i had zero responsibilities worst: 2018 because I had anxiety attacks throughout the whole year and I lost two of my pets and one of them was abducted
Funny how you said the Arabs translated the works of the greeks which otherwise would've been lost, when if it wasn't for the Arabs, the Byzantines wouldn't have lost them to begin with.
He refers mainland Europe, particularly in Spain where many Greek and Latin texts were really just passed over by the Europeans at the time, but were eventually embraced by the Arabs.
"lost" here is not just literal loosing... intellectual interest and the ability to understand and to develop upon such works..... the Arabs took roman and Hellenistic works and comparatively studies them against Persian, Indian and Chinese works.... thereby weeding out what was wrong, leading to better technological advancements.... the Caliph had decreed a task force to search and translate all manner of books.. their relevance and worth later researched upon, it dint matter to them if it was going against their scripture... while in europe even if there was scientific evidence, they would be burned along with the author.....
Avinash Varman You think the Byzantines couldn't understand the works of the Romans? They "Lost" it to the Arabs after the middle east was conquered by said Arabs.
First thing you're saying the dark ages is the whole of the medieval period? The Dark Ages span from roughly collapse of the Roman empire so est. 450-500 AD to 1000 AD and is called that due to their wasn't much written history, but also the things you have mentioned such as religious changes. seems strange to add 500 year period (1000-1500 the medieval period ) onto what was considered the dark ages, which is now more known as the migration age , covering germanic tribes, Franks, anglo-saxon and norse history in Europe amongst others.
This is missing mentions of the incredible works of philosophy, art, literature and architecture that came out of "boring Europe" during the Dark Ages, which specifically refers to the time period of Western Europe.
Completely ignoring the Carolingian Renaissance and the thousands of ancient texts saved by Charlemagne's efforts. Who also built the Aachen cathedral in about three years starting in 796, which was one among dozens. Then calling Islam, snatching and selling a million Europeans on slave markets during the Middle Ages, enlightened. How much of an ignorant idiot can this guy be.
he ignored it because it was taught in school, while a lot was taken out for dumb reasons. It's boring because we learn it for 12yrs straight of the same thing over and over again. Only way to learn some new stuff they didn't add was highly suggested in college. However that doesn't share a lot due to being "too much", well a lot did happen so there's no way there would be "too much". Known fact, Europe is taught more due to familiarity, which is why you'll only hear glossed over information about everything past the Middle East. To this day a lot of people don't know much about Asia except for the Han Dynasty and the Mongols. Funny though from Asian history class in college, I found about the holes that were taken out of history books. I learned the nitty gritty of America and Europe from this class, things that were taken out of textbooks for no reason. You should look into the opium influence in China and how it get there, it's rather amusing.
@@Walker-ow7vj and also the emperor ordered the opium to be burned in massive batches as well. There's still a lot of info that's glossed over about the details of what exactly happened, since it's not relevant to American history go figure lol
Yeah. I was shocked he called Aquinas "an important philosopher". That's like calling Newton "an important scientist". Aquinas was one of the top 10 most brilliant people ever to live
Worst year: 2017-2019 due to highschool's, insane 9 classes and Ap classes that I never signed up for. Best year 2007: Was a little kid, nothing to worry about in the world.
'Great historical overview, but it misses one point; 'The Dark Ages' describes a period in EUROPEAN history. Consequently, what was happening in the rest of the world was pretty much a separate matter. In fact, the prosperity and progress going on elsewhere, by contrast, makes the European situation look even more dismal.
Well, he does mention that things are better on the outside. But, in an age when communication was so limited, this can have had little effect on the lot of the Europeans of the day.
Okay, this one I CAN answer. The last "golden age" began with the publication of Action Comics #1, cover dated June 1938 and ended in the late '40s, as the popularity of the super hero began to fade, after WWII.
Worst: 2011 - shoulder surgery right before summer school, college transfers, school & personal crises Best: 2017 - trip to Australia, solar eclipse, multiple graduations, family reunion
I find life expectancy of 30 hard to believe. Maybe if you don't count in all the dead newborns you'd get more realistic picture. It's simply hard to imagine that most people would die around 30 years old. It makes no sense.
Well the life expectancy at that time was 30 cause then they didn't have much medical professionals as we do Today making them weak to many sicknesses and eventually kill them now we can live to 70 or such do to medical and technological advances
The problem here is non-specific use of statistics; they don't actually mean anything by themselves. An average has no real-life predictive qualities, so we can't use it to reproduce a real life in our mind. People like throwing around numbers, mostly because other people really enjoy having numbers thrown at them.
Also I know this was hard to believe but smallpox was so common back then that pretty much everyone was expected to get it, and a lotttt of people died from that, I know it seems small compared to other reasons but this in combination with other factors led to such a low life expectancy
Yep. Our calculations of life expectancy in most historic periods are misleadingly low. The high infant mortality brings the average down drastically, but if you made it past childhood (and for women childbirth), your life expectancy was actually a lot higher and much closer to ours than one might think, assuming that you didn't happen to live in a time with some type of plague or famine
Worst: 2021 Best: 2022, 2023 A very close cousin died in a car accident in 2021, and because of that I completely changed my direction in life. Now I’m in engineering classes doing great and I’m actually excited about my future.
I find this series a little too focused on the eastern world. I mean, there's a lot to be said about the European middle ages. How come there isn't an entire episode describing the relations, treasons, and wars between the different european kingdoms ? Nothing about the Hundred Years' War ?
Because focus in western school lies with the west, while history is not just the west. Plus the term Dark ages is a western based word, in the Dark ages the Eastern part of the world (Islamic Empires and China, Asia and so on) where enlightened and most certainly not Dark. so to explain why the Dark ages are a wrong way of describing the world you should focus on the east. Greetings a western History student. Besides western school's drown you in European History XD
Tripserpentine You are completely right. Its pains me that our history classes focus so much on europe and later north america. this leaves an expression that nothing major or intresting happened outside of europe and because of this many people think that Africa and Asia were just full of tribal barbarians who never did anything great.
Just to put it out there, from 1985-c.1997 were decent years from me, but after a family tragedy, the next 22 years were the Dark Ages for me, as was often cut off from a lot of people, but this year thanks to good technological advancement have certainly entered a new era of remaining in touch with people, good friendships etc, so this is kind of like the Communication Age. Like, we did have internet for a long time, but it's only recently that it's pretty safe to say that reliable internet with decent speed is more the norm now.
BeanturdBrain n You're right but 2006 was the PINNACLE of my childhood because we always play C.T.R (Crash Bandicoot Racing) on my PlayStation 1 GOOD TIMES!
I think its a little misleading to posit that the "Dark Ages" weren't so dark after all by using examples from Eastern cultures. The Dark Ages really only describes Western Europe after the fall of the Western Roman Empire. I realize that a revisionist or even contrarion view of history will always be interesting, but the fall of the Western Roman Empire really did set off a period of technological and societal regression for those territories.
mostafa mamouni Yes, its ethno centric, because its used to describe the area of Europe, thats kinda the point. Its what the Europeans called their worst years.
mostafa mamouni Addressing the loss of technological ability, population decline, loss of ability of regional industrial specialization, loss of military strategy and logistic ability, is not ethnocentrism. I'm not discussing the cultural evolution of the area or passing judgement or the cultural melting pot of the Italian peninsula with the influx of tribal confederations. I am taking about ability and societal metrics. While the decline of Western Europe has been overemphasized and almost romanticized, to pretend that it did not exist is simply revisionist and more than a little contrarian.
***** I think the real "agenda" here is just to challenge existing paradigms and present a new, more accessible view. This isn't a bad thing and they don't presume to judge those who think differently, so I consider it a good thing. Those of us who chaffed all through school at Euro-centric "great man" history tend to find it a refreshing change. Instead of thinking about these vids as having an agenda, try instead to view them as playing to a different demographic than that which history has served for decades (if not centuries) now. It's not about "those nasty Europeans", just about how different parts of the world experienced different things at different times. It's about how the rest of us were not just savages doing nothing during those times when Europe stagnated and called it a Dark Age or some kind of pause button on development. Whether historians still use the term or not, most of society still considers it so, which is a detriment to those interested in a global perspective. And, to those of us as interested in anthropology as history, as well as those of us not descending from white Europeans, those alternative views, will always be a wonderful and fascinating topic. It doesn't diminish the contributions Europe made, just reminds us that they weren't the only additions of import ever offered society.
I'm about 2 minutes in: 1) The Dark Ages usually only refer to the Early Middle Ages (at least nowadays it does), which runs from about the 600s to the 1000s (fall of Rome and Germanic Tribe Kingdoms up to Carolingian Empire and its fall, which led to the creation (somewhat) of the modern states of Western and Central Europe). 2) Feudalism (generally) was a political system. Manorialism (generally) was an economic system. Generally refers to the generality of the terms (like there were a bunch of different types of feudalism and manorialism), not that sometimes one was the other.
***** In general historical practice, Feudalism is the set of political relationships between actors in the Middle Ages, while Manorialism was the set of economic relationships between actors. Feudalism can appear to take on more of an economic aspect once inter-manor relations (like Noble-Noble relations) are the object of study, but that's just because trade wasn't as prevalent or defined in that period, so the political relationships necessarily took on more of an economic aspect.
worst year: 1993 (i quit smoking)
best year: all that followed because i quit smoking :-)
Lol life is upside down
+KingTesticus Well good on you pal that's a hard thing too do.
Jake Azz
been there done that. i think i'll take being a "puss" for a while, thank you very much ;-)
*****
Jake Azz and how many things you can smell and taste after you've quit ;-) how much further you can walk and run, how much longer you can fukk
KingTesticus I wish my old man would just do that. He's been trying those vapors smokers it sorta worked for awhile but we haven't had money for awhile and he's frankly just too thick headed to quit cold.
worst: 2017 when the first dog I have ever loved enough was hit by a car so much that he was paralysed
best: 2017 when the vet told me he was just being melodramatic and nothing was wrong with him
WOW
LMAO OOPS
Omg hahahah
Dark lol!
weird flex but ok
Best year: 100 BC (Birth of Julius Caesar)
Worst year: 100 BC (Birth of Julius Caesar)
I'm both Patrician and Plebeian.
That's impressive
Professor Mercury So basically you're Julius Caesar?
Professor Mercury So technically you are 2100+ years old?
If you like July then you should probably like Julius lol
+Professor Mercury nice
i just studied that in school
“Your worst year is someone else’s best year.”
Pretty sure nobody’s having their best year in 2020
Toilet paper manufacturers disagree with you
*Mask companies laughing in the corner*
Zombie Man I’m not having the best but it’s my top 5 best (I’m 14)
this is my best year for me. i'm doing three hour long home schooling and spending the rest of my time playing roblox or watching youtube
im kinda living it up tbh, in boston all school was canceled
John: 2001 is the worst year
2020: hold my corona
Well played
wow
Nice😂😂😂😂😂😂
this was made in 2012
@@anthonyJones-ll4ei yes I am aware of that
the best year: every year in the 2000's except for 2020
Literally live for the "wait for it...the Mongols"
*Cue Mongoltage*
Aaaaaaaaaaaa!
Same
*The Mongol tide*
We’re the exception!
Best year: 2015
Worst year: 2020
Thank you John Green, for writing amazing books and being so supportive of students and teachers everywhere! As someone who just finished being a student, and is about to be a teacher, I am grateful for your work.
Best wishes,
Clara Nims
it's always the Mongols.
They are the exceptions.
Always....
Always. Genghis khan was probably the only guy to snort coke from a 100 girl's asses with each being a different ethnicity in a row, you never know with these Mongols.
Godamn Mongols
Mania115 hey they are the exception
Worst Year: 19BBY - When order 66 happened.
Best Year: 4ABY - When the Empire has fallen.
YAAAAAAAAAAAAASSSSS!!!!!!!
the force has brought me here
Ik it has something to do with a battle but I always read that as “before baby yoda” and “after baby yoda”
fan star wars see i
Yay
Worst year : 2009 Diagnosed with cancer
Best year: This Year. :) Graduated high school, made a lot of good friends, becoming an adult, etc.
Wow.
HoldUpStrong Yup. ^^
You're an awesome person just know that !
In the face of cancer, you're still kicking ass at the entire idea of DFTBA. :) You deserve all the gold stars and high fives - and here's a virtual high five from me. Keep rockin' it!
I wish you good luck!
Best Year: Literally anything other than 2020 I am stuck and home watching our special guest John Green for the next month (I do love john green tho) but also ah
I feel you
Retweeted 💕
Same feeling
SAME ikr
Me too
I love how this channel sheds light on history that is not taught in American classrooms. Thank you guys so much for educating all of us!!
Life expectancy was short because infant mortality rate was so high due to lack of knowledge in hygiene. Once people passed certain age, they actually lived relatively longer than what we thought. The skeleton findings prove this.
Well that and increase to standards of living due to industlization helped as well.
Bryan Yang
The Greek philosophers’ lifespans were relatively long; I don’t know if the rest of the Greek population lived long lives though.
@@jcincorporated6207 other places were the same. Psalm 90 says "As for the days of our life, they contain seventy years, Or if due to strength, eighty years"
And Isiah 23 says "Now in that day Tyre will be forgotten for seventy years like the days of one king. "
There are other sources from other places too, but these are quickest examples to quote.
Of course my people, the Indians, Invented zero.
"How much are we going to pay, sahid?"
"Hold on" Draws a circle
"...What is it?"
"Nothing"
"...How much is in it?"
"Nothing"
'sniff' "It's beautiful!" 'sniff'
If you get the reference you are awesome.
that one indian comedian , russel is his name , not sure tho
Potato
You are awesome! Now take it, and go.
+rowyne madayag Hello my twin
Joshua Toeppe
It's been a long time... brother!
Somebody gonna get a hurt real bad, Russel Peters!
Worst, 2025. So much studying.
Best 2026-2015. When I finally finished the time machine and invested in Bitcoin. Man, it was a weird year.
Can I loan your time machine?
drizzeN Sure. Meet me yesterday at the pub.
@@PointySword Can't we meet tomorrow instead? I'll pay for your studies once I start earning the money from the bets I intend to make.
drizzeN you mean borrow... unless you mean that you want to loan it to a third party
2023 was by best and worst year. This first time through it was great, then I used the time machine to try it again, and it was awful.
worst: 2016. was cheated on, kicked out of home, totaled my car, contacted bacterial meningitis, and became homeless.
best: so far 2018. I have an amazing boyfriend, my mental illness is somewhat under control, I have a job that I think will lead to my career, and I'm pretty much fully independent.
in short?? life gets better. just keep on living.
Did it get worse again?
WELL SCREW YOUR EX!
Life gets better just you wait~
Just you wait~
(Hamilton lyrics! What! I can’t help myself!)
your the best
weird flex but ok
@Sass Master I'm very proud, must have been hard to carry on yet you did! :D
Just a sneaky little hand behind John at 10:44 who also wants in on the fun
STAN
STAN LEE CAMO
stan fix this now
I actually find it interesting how the end of the dark ages and the beginning of the enlightenment in Europe coincided with the start of a regression in the Middle East, and how heavily intertwined both were.
+ahens74ah Except it wan't just Muslims. Throughout the dark ages Europe was constantly under siege; the Visigoths, the Vikings, the Eastern Empire, the Muslim Caliphates, the Mongols-the list goes on. Toward the end, that dynamic switched-the Muslim Caliphates were the ones under siege from Persians, Turks, Mongols, and Europeans. And in fact, it was knowledge brought back from the Caliphates during the Crusades that helped spark the intellectual awakening that became the Enlightenment.
+Daniel Ryan it did not end. It simply did not happen. The historians called this period of time dark because they find only very few evidences the life was going on. But Herbert Illig theory (this times never happened) seems right. Around 300 years was insert into the calendar.
+Daniel Ryan That seems to be a bit of an overstatement for the middle east. The Ottomans and Safavids were just starting to flourish at this time.
*****
wrong lmao..it was the muslims.
+qd FATE Its one of those ironies of history. As utterly brutal and even pointless as the Crusades and the Mongol invasions of Europe where, the flow of knowledge, goods, and languages that both brought to Europe was undeniably a key contributor to the start of The Enlightenment.
*People in the Comments:* God 2020 is the worst!
*2021:* I'm about to ruin these peoples' whole education
what?
@@fordakacar he knows something we don't
Yes Ive been thinking about that and omg
GOD :
*Parry this you filthy casual*
I JUST REALIZED YOU ARE THE JOHN GREEN, THE ONE WHO MADE FAULT IN OUR STARS AND PAPERTOWN. I LITERALLY WOULD'VE NEVER KNOWN EXCEPT FOR AN AD IN TARGET
Yeah, I learned John Green was the author of those books just last night. Pretty mind-blowing.
Wow
What really
I’ve googled it and its legit, yeah he’s the same dude
This is crazy to learn right now here on this thread because I am reading The Fault in Our Stars right now, I am at about 50% in it, and I just started binge watching Crash Course World History last week. Mind blown
Excellent content! Thank you for putting together all of these... the histories of the Persian, European, and a bit of Chinese during the “Dark Ages.” I’ve been looking for something like this. I’ve always been interested in correlating time periods in history! Thank you very much!! It helps a lot in my lifelong journey in learning our world’s history!!
Abbasids vs China was definitely not in my history books growing up, thank you for the brain food
Me Too
studying for ap world history quizzes here. i can't find the crash course on islam in india.
da best he has a mughal dynasty video
Pete oh sweet thanks. luckily my ap world quiz on it wasn't very hard and i was able to get by with the textbook
751 ad :D
Worst year(s) 2001-2019
Fun fact, I was born in 2001.
The Lone Wanderer me too
Me too
yeouch
wow thoese depressed kids
2003-19 me!
The dark ages weren't named "dark ages" because they were unenlightened, but because they didn't leave behind much written history, leaving historians "in the dark" about their civilizations.
That term was first used by Francisco Petrarch (1304-1374) to basically mean nothing happened. No advancements.
It was called the fall ages because there were many knights
True man
Adelester
The Dark Ages was a time where people lacked knowledge. Everything they were told they believed in and didn't question. The importance of the Age of Enlightenment, is it changes people's views of the world they knew. Without Enlightened ideas Feudalism and the strict absolute rule would have been around much longer. As peasants would not have question how unfair their lives were
Umm, no. Modern historians would object to the term Dark Ages to cover anything other than the first couple of hundred years following the fall of the Western Roman Empire in the 5th century. It is called dark because very little written documentation exists from that period. Starting with the Carolingian Renaissance in the 9th century, literacy and learning definitely started to spread again. Things were slowed down a bit by the Viking invasions (which actually played a major role in the development of Feudalism), but after the end of the Viking Age (1066 is a good end point), things started to develop pretty rapidly. The 12th century would see the development of Universities leading to a whole bunch of important philosophers (Albertus Magnus, Thomas Aquinas, Duns Scotus and William of Ockham among others showing up in the 13th. Also, the 14th century (still part of the Middle Ages which essentially would end with the the 15th century) saw peasant revolts. And actually absolute rule was not a Medieval thing; Feudalism was a relationship of mutual obligations; obviously the military classes took advantages of it, but the Peasants in that era had rights. In addition, following the Black Death in the 14th century, the system started breaking down because following the Black Death, the power of the peasants grew in direct proportion to how many fewer of them there were. Absolutism actually came with the Protestant Reformation and the Enlightenment were for the first time the princes and emperors of Europe no longer had to worry about answering to the Pope.
Worst year: 1998, cause I was born.
Best year: 1997, cause I wasn’t suffering
found the bhuddist
Edgy
Hi5
The Puppetteer that’s tuff
All life is Suffering
As a History teacher, I enjoy watching these courses and how simply they are explained. However, most of my students complain about them due to the rapid speech. Is there any way you could slow it down a bit in order to allow for deeper understanding?
Best year and worst year= 2019. Mom and Best Friend died. BUT I also branched out, fixed my bulimia, made friends, and learned what it was to smile because I wanted to (not because it was expected to make them family look better or make someone else happy).
Okay, but how many angels CAN fit on the head of a needle??
One for every brain cell I lose by thinking about it
Nicholas Kjerland You listen to me!! We are NOT going BACK!!
my friend dean might know someone with an answer
You might say endless because angels are not from a physical form rather a spiritual form so no matter how many angel fit inside the head of a needle it is still have enough room for more angels to fit
Just like faith it is endless
Nicholas Kjerland How big is the needle?
Speaking of prejudices like "Eurocentrism", the example he holds up as a typical theological debate owes its origins to the anti-religious, anti-clerical prejudicies of the so-called 'Enlightenment': medieval theologians/philosophers NEVER debated how many angels could dance on the head of a pin, that was made up by one of their critics to make fun of them.
And there was a renaissance called "Carolingian Renaissance," where universities were built and standardized writing with Carolingian Miniscule. Then, Charles' stupid sons managed to ruin it all.
powerist But they did not manage to "ruin it all" for the Eastern Roman Empire.
***** Well, any presentation that tries to cover all of the "dark ages" in such a short time is going to gloss over a lot -- especially because despite the common prejudice, those ages were not really 'dark'. But I have to agree that there were several things he could have talked about less in order to spend more time on 1) the Carolingian Renaissance and 2) the Roman Empire in the East, which avoided most of this 'darkness'.
Finally someone speaks truthfully about Islam . thank you
Huss S About the Arabic empire in the Middle Ages. It's not like people are criticising Islam 1000 years ago, and the Islamic world today is a total mess.
Fakey
Directly because of western imperialism trying so vehemently to force democracy on people that DONT WANT IT. But intervention from the west is caused mostly by the desire to continue their extortion and oppression of the Middle East. Gaddafi for example wanted a pan African gold dinar currency for trading, which would topple the west's economic dominance of Africa and finally liberate the continent from western influence. America and NATO didn't like that, and they funded terrorists to destroy the greatest country in Africa. Sad really, how the West used the knowledge of the east i.e. Gunpowder to imprison us in impoverishment. As of now, Russia is the last bastion against the influence of the west.
Fakey Not imperial, imperialist, those are two different things. Russia is way more imperialist than the US? Are you joking? The US has over 600 military bases outside of the US, and Russia has only about 2 or 3. The US has WMDs pointed straight at russia and moscow in eastern europe. I've already explained this, the US seeks to indirectly control the economy of any place it can, and as I said, when Gaddafi proposed an idea that would dismantle America's extortion of Africa, they funded radical and savage Islamist to destroy the greatest country on the continent. That isn't globalist, that is intensely imperialist. The US wants to control the African and middle eastern economy, not guide it.
"Islam with it's lack of personal freedoms "
What lack of personal freedoms? This has nothing to do with personal freedoms. The middle east is a shithole strictly because of western imperialism. Jesus christ, westerners with their overly biased view of the world. Absolutely disgusting.
"Truth about Islam" is a history lesson of the 'dark ages'?
***** No one needs to hear it, it's obvious from their actions. Example: Gaddafi was planning on a pan african gold dinar currency that would topple western banking in Africa. Soon after, US funded terrorists destroyed Libya and savagely murdered Gaddafi. I wish I could see every american behind the libyan terrorists murdered just like Gaddafi was, slowly, while begging for mercy.
“Nothing gold can stay”
*sobs* stay gold ponyboy 😭
I thought medieval times were call the dark ages because it was knight....
*ba dum tss*
Ha
Ha
Ha
Get out.
Joseph Murphy lol
ha
ha
ha
ha
ha
ha
ha
ha
I watched this, and then did a project on the Golden Age of Islam / Islamic Golden Age in school. So thank you for showing me such an interesting side to the Middle Ages.
Maybe it's just because I really enjoy medieval European history but I find John Green's outlook here a bit bothersome. It seems like many people, in an attempt to avoid euro-centrism he is rather dismissive of Europe in general(including poetry although he does mention a few notable European theologians from that period). He chooses instead to speak incredibly positively regarding Muslim culture, which really could have used a more balanced approach. I understand time is limited, but I feel like this video should have been divided into a few parts, one for the Muslim world of the middle ages, another for Europe.
That's interesting. Since i enjoy medieval European history as well, I extra much enjoyed this particular episode specifically because it went into different directions. I had no idea what China was like in those centuries; this was a great, fresh, new perspective that made my day.
Unfortunately its hard to find good documentaries/books on china, other than the ones meant for PHD's. actually, it's hard to find any history documentary, what with the history channel as it is.
I too felt this was a tad dismissive. There are many dark ages in world history, but the period between the fall of the Western Empire and say the Norman invasion of England, generally known as The Dark Ages, is the title so, yeah, weak. He made the feudal system sound benevolent, as though lords didn't use their knights against peasants, other lords or their king constantly. Not to mention the threat of constant invasion by tribes displaced by the Huns or over-population, or just because you're a Viking and that's what you do! (Where are the Vikings in this show?!) For the the Romanized peoples of Europe, the withdrawal of the legions and ensuing chaos WAS the end of the world -- exactly the level of social breakdown that "preppers" build bunkers for. Yes, do talk about the accomplishments of the Arab world at this time, they carried the torch of civilization (maybe devote an episode to it, deserves one) but talk about China in an episode on, say, China. I'd also add that The Black Plague, while obviously not a great time, was key in dismantling the feudal system and in setting the stage for Europe's social, economic, artistic and scientific rebirth. The episode about the Crusades didn't talk about China. It was about the Crusades. If you want "Stuff that happened in the world between 500 AD/CE and 1400" call the episode that. There are so many brilliant tacks one could take on this both destructive and formative moment in history, this seemed like an intellectual cop-out. I thought, maybe all he'd say was 'the Dark Ages weren't so dark', but benevolent feudal rule? Guess he forgot to be awesome that day.
DoneAnd Dusted Try Michael Wood "Legacy: The Mandate of Heaven." It's on UA-cam.
yeah but what is called the middle ages in europe wasn't so dark everywhere else.
I always thought it was called the Dark Ages because we had very little recorded history of the time.
best year 2015 got my gaming pc
worst year 2015 pretty much failed school
i feel u *hugs*
+TooDamnLitten Coincidence? Who knows..
there may be a correlation there bud.
I think not.
I'm only 16 so I don't think I've lived long enough to know if I've had a worst year
+Matthew Hardcastle You can always say 'so far'.
I'm only 20, and so far my worst year was 2012 and my best year is 2016. That will probably change with time, but with my current experience, that's what it is.
best year 2013, worst year 2016 tommorow because of the test
+DJ Ryan lol the AP test right?
+Justin Loeung yep
I feel you👌
2014 worst. 1015 best.
HIV test?
When you are doing your history task for the Silk Road and your empire is... wait for it..
*The Mongols*
That's me!
Have fun! The mongols have a looong history.
Was that a joke
@@youllneverknow_123 nope it wasn't. I have to do a presentation with 2 other people about the Mongols in 7th grade :)
Nah man I was talking to the other guy
We're Europe! The Prime Meridian runs through us, we're in the middle of every map, and we get to be a continent even though we're... not a continent! Watch in 0.5 speed!
It's good at any speed.
+Lanivan King I followed your suggestion, it's really funny ;)
+Lanivan King He sounds a little like Emo Phillips at that speed
+Lanivan King try the into in speed 2x
+Lanivan King needs to be more drunk
2014: When I was diagnosed with Depression
2017: When I graduated high school and beat my depression.
DarkSoulsUnleashed congrats my dude
Dang
Gay.
2016: When I got straight A's in my A levels and had a great year all around, making many new friends and enjoying my courses
2017: When I stopped enjoying my courses, they became substantially more difficult, one of my friends killed himself and my mental health rapidly deteriorated
btw congrats on graduating and beating your depression - two significant achievements
This conversation certainly includes a range of emotions
2020: corona virus almost WW3
"Almost ww3" sounds a lot better than "start of world war 2"
NOT EVEN CLOSE!
Worst year 2015 (started smoking, brother left for college, depression)
Best year 2018 (second and third semester at college, met my girlfriend, started the shamefully long process of quitting smoking)
My worst year was 2017, a year where idiocy and anxiety almost took over.
I'm still looking for a best year, since the rest were mostly good.
Anyone her just cause you wanted to hear a little history?
Maarttiin obviously
Me too and my last names Martin too
Im replaying it any time I'm free so I can hard press it into my mind that the world didn't begin in the 90s when I was born lol
Maarttiin i hv a test coming up lol
No I’ve been watching all of theese since next year I will be in tenth grade world history P.S I’m in 8th
John Green: Watch as I redefine the Dark Ages into a topic about non-European history.
To everyone taking the AP World exam tomorrow- good luck, I believe in you!!
At 10:44 somone pops their head behind the chalkboard.
best year: 2001 bc Shrek was released
worst year: 1997 bc i was born
Riya Lukose soo you're 4...ummm...ok..i guess...
gay
susan kakakhel How could you think she's 4?
T-Wrex oh wait i just finished reading it 3 times...thx for telling me..
susan kakakhel No problem. In case you're still having trouble, she was born in 1997 meaning she's 20 years old right now.
Her favourite year was 2001 because Shrek, her favourite movie, was released.
This was 8 years ago?!
This is 2020-Quarantine Quality show ❤️
Excellent job!
10:44 someone is trying to do something in the background. o.O
Worst year: 1812
best year: 1776
Haha 1812 and 1945 my best years and 1991 worst one....
But what about 1945 and the entire 1920s?
Adonis Excuse me? But do you have a problem with Tchaikovsky masterpiece??????
Adonis 1812 was a good year because it started off the era of good feelings
worst 1204 best 1314
don't forget to mention my main man Muhammad ibn Al-Khwarismismi
Or Ibn Khaldun. He founded capitalism.
Tasin Al-Hassan can you explain
@Marco Hubrão Capitalism is the privatisation of a countries trade and industry for the profit of the individual. This can in no way apply to most of human history. And about ibn khaldun. He also came up with(or probaply did since there were other scholars who also knew of this idea like ibn tamiyyah) the idea of supply and demand which is essential to capitalism. So he invented crucial parts of capitalism, but not the idea itself.
@@al-muwaffaq341 He is talking about ibn khaldun, a tunisian historian who is considered the forerunner of modern day disciplines of economics, demography & sociology. He also invented supply economics(as the guy above explained).
@Peter Cross Father of algebra
The dark ages are one of my favorite periods in world history. The weaponry advanced at a very amazing speed, and the battles were absolutely amazing, for example, Lechfeld
One invention that we underrepresented, Carolingian Miniscule.
Daaloul Chiheb Ummm, that was a myth actually. Medieval Church tend to frown on Witch Burning since it's pagan culture. Well, Monks do research on science but tend towards sheep breeding and clock making.
See, a great time to be alive
It just makes you think about all the things you would do if you had a Tommy, a time machine, and a hell of a lot of ammo
"The Dark Ages weren't a time of great poetry"
Beowulf, the Arthurian Legends, the Song of Roland, the Tales of Alexander the Great, the Divine Comedy, the Canterbury Tales, etc.:
Are we a joke to you?
He didn't say there wasn't poetry, just no great poetry
Rob B Yes, and that is all great poetry…
The Canterbury Tales and Divine Comedy were both 14th-15th century, weren't they?
@@hallamhal Yes, but the "historian" in this video does not realize that the "Dark Ages" designation only used to refer to the period between 500 and 1000, so when he uses it, he is also referring to the 14th and 15th centuries.
This is a Cultural Marxist channel sponsored to spew a specific propaganda n agenda against European culture
i'm just here coz i wanted to hear excited john again, he sounded so sad in the crash course Europe history ;-;
Interesting. To gloss over the great migration and the fact that in most cases the dark ages is referring to not the whole of the middle ages but only the first half till about the year 1000.
I'm binge-watching this entire series to prepare for my World History SAT. Thanks, John Green, AKA "a student's best friend." (Also Hank.)
“Was the age really so dark? Depends on what you find depressing : )”
Al-gebra was an Arabic mathematical invention. Great job CrashCourse.
khwarazmi who invented al gebra was a persian , do not lie bro
al gebra , al chemy , al gorithm
you may be confused with ibn al haytham who studied algorithms who was an arab
Shamlan Hasawi
ok i know ibn al haytham was an arab but khwarazmi invented algorithm and he was a persian
and by the way Ibn Rochd was a north african berber ... keep lying to yourself arab ...
This video is a good example of why you should never read the UA-cam comments
Why, so you can believe his distorted propagandistic history?
best year 2016. Worst year 2016. I'm one, if you didn't notice
Abbasids are descendants of the uncle of the prophet, his name is Abbas bin Abdel Motaleb and are Arabs
Your videos are unbelievably informative I love your style man
I bet the history books in China are not eurocentric. History is written from the perspective of the writer, which is the best and most honest way to record history.
Thanks for putting a different perspective in an otherwise euro centric definition of Middle Ages.
Also, I like the point regarding Religion and Science. I don't see why people think the two can't coexist together.
I luv John n Hank - they are fighting for education to be fun, open and crazy in a good way. And they are winning
3:46 Looks just like when u color ur textbook with ur highlighters
Maybe I'm biased being European but the cathedrals look more beautiful.
2013 worst broke my back and lost my mom.
2014 best I'm still alive. I miss my mom but I know she'd be happy I'm learning on my free time.
Best wishes and stay strong, my friend.
I feel like people really missed the point of this video. Rather than sitting down and ranting about how the Europeans had some nice poetry and were starting to re-embrace science, he decided to show people that East was flourishing quite well at the time - and that other two major powers in the world at the time actually existed, and should not be glazed over as they so often are. He's made videos about Rome where he never once mentions Carthage, yet people don't complain about that (much). Yet when he makes a video about a time period, people go insane that he doesn't mention that the Europeans were paving the way to their enlightenment era while the rest of the Eurasian world happily continued on with theirs.
***** He dedicates at minimum a twelfth of this video to the discussion of European feudalism. He mentions that Europe in this time saw theologians rising, with his major examples being Thomas Aquinas and Saint Hildegard. He isn't saying Europe sucked - he consistently says that the Dark Ages in contemporary views are quite Eurocentric, which they are, but beyond that all he's saying is that the little goods Europe saw were overshadowed by the goods outside of it.
I, for one, didn't miss the point of the video. I just think the title is misleading. "The Dark Ages" refers to a period in the history of Europe. Interesting though it was, John's content dealt, not with the Dark Ages, but with things happening contemporaneously with the Dark Ages. If John was going to focus so little on Europe, he shouldn't have named the video after a period in European history.
anyone else cramming for the WHAP exam tomorrow?
because uhhh
me
bruh same tho realized i didn't know what the middle ages was
:( oops
Suds V yeah, the whole 1000-1700’s is just a haze for me
Saaaaame
What’s a WHAP lmao
Claire D yeesssss
Worst year 1453, best year 1830
Fall of Constantinople and Greece's independence from the Ottomans? Just a guess.
I love greek people. Good luck liberating Constantinople!
+Uzay Sarıkaya Would be interesting though
Alex Fesler what's bad in 1483
Lmao my year gonna be the worst as soon as college board hits me with that 2
lol that's what im thinking with this AP exam . . .
+Atomicnick lmao true
worst 2008 I was violently bullied
best 2011 started a new school, was actually challenged mentally, made cool new friends, discovered my passion for theatre.
I love how he mentions the Mongols in every single episode
Cramming 1000 years of the entire world's history into a 12 minute video doesn't do any region's history justice. The "Dark Ages" commonly refer to Europe's early Medieval period, and there's enough there to fill a video. I get the point about western history education being Eurocentric, but that warrants a side note, it doesn't warrant going off-topic for 2/3 of the video.
Best year : 2014 - Began year 11 in High school
Worst year : 2015 - Began A levels
+Flying Spectacles
I can't relate to any comment LESS. Just reading the words "high school" puts an anxious pit in my chest that spirals into an existential crisis where I have to reconcile my morality and feelings of responsibility to my family with my overwhelming urge to cause suffering to people who have wronged me and a sincere desire to die.
It helps to talk though.
Alex Peters
lol
Best year: 2015- Found myself
Worst year: 2014- Abused drugs
+WillyTheComposer best year 2013 found a best friend worst year 2007 I got type 1 diabetes
Best year 1996. I was finally tall enough to ride upside down roller coasters.
Worst year when I was born and best year prob when I die
Loser Bro Productions
k
+skulduggery pleasantt dont hate yourself that much bro :)
the most accurate answer I've ever seen
Do you need someone to talk to?
100% relatable :D
best: 2004 because i was born and i had zero responsibilities
worst: 2018 because I had anxiety attacks throughout the whole year and I lost two of my pets and one of them was abducted
Heyyyy 2004 kids unite
@@orionbaker7494 yo
Best 1975
Worst 2001
Brick convinced me Enron's weather derivatives were a sure fire deal.
Funny how you said the Arabs translated the works of the greeks which otherwise would've been lost, when if it wasn't for the Arabs, the Byzantines wouldn't have lost them to begin with.
Well the Church as well as other parts of Europe had Geek & Roman works as well...
He refers mainland Europe, particularly in Spain where many Greek and Latin texts were really just passed over by the Europeans at the time, but were eventually embraced by the Arabs.
"lost" here is not just literal loosing... intellectual interest and the ability to understand and to develop upon such works..... the Arabs took roman and Hellenistic works and comparatively studies them against Persian, Indian and Chinese works.... thereby weeding out what was wrong, leading to better technological advancements.... the Caliph had decreed a task force to search and translate all manner of books.. their relevance and worth later researched upon, it dint matter to them if it was going against their scripture... while in europe even if there was scientific evidence, they would be burned along with the author.....
Avinash Varman Exactly, great point.
Avinash Varman
You think the Byzantines couldn't understand the works of the Romans? They "Lost" it to the Arabs after the middle east was conquered by said Arabs.
First thing you're saying the dark ages is the whole of the medieval period?
The Dark Ages span from roughly collapse of the Roman empire so est. 450-500 AD to 1000 AD and is called that due to their wasn't much written history, but also the things you have mentioned such as religious changes.
seems strange to add 500 year period (1000-1500 the medieval period ) onto what was considered the dark ages, which is now more known as the migration age , covering germanic tribes, Franks, anglo-saxon and norse history in Europe amongst others.
This is missing mentions of the incredible works of philosophy, art, literature and architecture that came out of "boring Europe" during the Dark Ages, which specifically refers to the time period of Western Europe.
Completely ignoring the Carolingian Renaissance and the thousands of ancient texts saved by Charlemagne's efforts. Who also built the Aachen cathedral in about three years starting in 796, which was one among dozens. Then calling Islam, snatching and selling a million Europeans on slave markets during the Middle Ages, enlightened. How much of an ignorant idiot can this guy be.
he ignored it because it was taught in school, while a lot was taken out for dumb reasons. It's boring because we learn it for 12yrs straight of the same thing over and over again. Only way to learn some new stuff they didn't add was highly suggested in college. However that doesn't share a lot due to being "too much", well a lot did happen so there's no way there would be "too much". Known fact, Europe is taught more due to familiarity, which is why you'll only hear glossed over information about everything past the Middle East. To this day a lot of people don't know much about Asia except for the Han Dynasty and the Mongols. Funny though from Asian history class in college, I found about the holes that were taken out of history books. I learned the nitty gritty of America and Europe from this class, things that were taken out of textbooks for no reason. You should look into the opium influence in China and how it get there, it's rather amusing.
HakumeiXKitten i know the british sold it to em but china said no and then we got opium wars and hong kong became a colony 🥴
@@Walker-ow7vj and also the emperor ordered the opium to be burned in massive batches as well. There's still a lot of info that's glossed over about the details of what exactly happened, since it's not relevant to American history go figure lol
Yeah. I was shocked he called Aquinas "an important philosopher". That's like calling Newton "an important scientist". Aquinas was one of the top 10 most brilliant people ever to live
Worst year: 2017-2019 due to highschool's, insane 9 classes and Ap classes that I never signed up for.
Best year 2007: Was a little kid, nothing to worry about in the world.
'Great historical overview, but it misses one point; 'The Dark Ages' describes a period in EUROPEAN history. Consequently, what was happening in the rest of the world was pretty much a separate matter. In fact, the prosperity and progress going on elsewhere, by contrast, makes the European situation look even more dismal.
which is exactly what he says at 01:27
Well, he does mention that things are better on the outside. But, in an age when communication was so limited, this can have had little effect on the lot of the Europeans of the day.
for example the nations of South America were in a golden age
Okay, this one I CAN answer. The last "golden age" began with the publication of Action Comics #1, cover dated June 1938 and ended in the late '40s, as the popularity of the super hero began to fade, after WWII.
you didnt talk about the byzantine golden age
Theodoros Milonas Lol this channel clearly favours a certain Islamic agenda
@@YouhavetoBelieve3347 xD "an Islamic agenda"
Worst: 2011 - shoulder surgery right before summer school, college transfers, school & personal crises
Best: 2017 - trip to Australia, solar eclipse, multiple graduations, family reunion
i am just watching this video because it was assigned for online schooling.
That's cute.
Same
Same
Same
Go watch the video clip about the mongols
I find life expectancy of 30 hard to believe. Maybe if you don't count in all the dead newborns you'd get more realistic picture. It's simply hard to imagine that most people would die around 30 years old. It makes no sense.
Well the life expectancy at that time was 30 cause then they didn't have much medical professionals as we do
Today making them weak to many sicknesses and eventually kill them now we can live to 70 or such do to medical and technological advances
Anthony's Entertainment ACTUALLY the real reason life expectancy seems this low is because of infant mortality rates.
The problem here is non-specific use of statistics; they don't actually mean anything by themselves. An average has no real-life predictive qualities, so we can't use it to reproduce a real life in our mind.
People like throwing around numbers, mostly because other people really enjoy having numbers thrown at them.
Also I know this was hard to believe but smallpox was so common back then that pretty much everyone was expected to get it, and a lotttt of people died from that, I know it seems small compared to other reasons but this in combination with other factors led to such a low life expectancy
Yep. Our calculations of life expectancy in most historic periods are misleadingly low. The high infant mortality brings the average down drastically, but if you made it past childhood (and for women childbirth), your life expectancy was actually a lot higher and much closer to ours than one might think, assuming that you didn't happen to live in a time with some type of plague or famine
Best year: 2014 because everything was so simple and fun :)
Worst year: 2016 everything was going down hill and I hit major depression :(
Worst: 2021
Best: 2022, 2023
A very close cousin died in a car accident in 2021, and because of that I completely changed my direction in life. Now I’m in engineering classes doing great and I’m actually excited about my future.
I find this series a little too focused on the eastern world. I mean, there's a lot to be said about the European middle ages. How come there isn't an entire episode describing the relations, treasons, and wars between the different european kingdoms ? Nothing about the Hundred Years' War ?
But it's boring and depressing; do you really want to learn about the plague 40 times.
i believe its because European history is well talked about in many history classes but rest of the world is left allmost untouched.
I'd even say that it could pay more attention to Africa and the Americas.
Because focus in western school lies with the west, while history is not just the west.
Plus the term Dark ages is a western based word, in the Dark ages the Eastern part of the world (Islamic Empires and China, Asia and so on) where enlightened and most certainly not Dark. so to explain why the Dark ages are a wrong way of describing the world you should focus on the east.
Greetings a western History student.
Besides western school's drown you in European History XD
Tripserpentine
You are completely right. Its pains me that our history classes focus so much on europe and later north america. this leaves an expression that nothing major or intresting happened outside of europe and because of this many people think that Africa and Asia were just full of tribal barbarians who never did anything great.
Best year 1933, worst year 1945.
hilarious
+Ben Lewis Worst year: 1776
Best year: 1785
👌
HAHAHAHHA
😉
Worst: day i was born
Best: Day i die
that was dark
literally was going to comment that
no mr. poop butt hole!! Life if pretty cool.
Oooo weeee! Mr Poopy Butthole is clinically depressed! Ooooo weeee!
Bear. Tomorrow will be the best day of your life.
Just to put it out there, from 1985-c.1997 were decent years from me, but after a family tragedy, the next 22 years were the Dark Ages for me, as was often cut off from a lot of people, but this year thanks to good technological advancement have certainly entered a new era of remaining in touch with people, good friendships etc, so this is kind of like the Communication Age. Like, we did have internet for a long time, but it's only recently that it's pretty safe to say that reliable internet with decent speed is more the norm now.
My best year in my life is in 2006, because when I arrive home from school, me and my friends always play PS1. Damn I miss my childhood!
2006 sounds like late ps2 era ..
BeanturdBrain n You're right but 2006 was the PINNACLE of my childhood because we always play C.T.R (Crash Bandicoot Racing) on my PlayStation 1 GOOD TIMES!
Gewd Tyms.
THIS GAME! IT IS THE BEST RACING GAME FOREVER!!!
I think its a little misleading to posit that the "Dark Ages" weren't so dark after all by using examples from Eastern cultures. The Dark Ages really only describes Western Europe after the fall of the Western Roman Empire. I realize that a revisionist or even contrarion view of history will always be interesting, but the fall of the Western Roman Empire really did set off a period of technological and societal regression for those territories.
ethno centric much?
mostafa mamouni Yes, its ethno centric, because its used to describe the area of Europe, thats kinda the point. Its what the Europeans called their worst years.
mostafa mamouni Addressing the loss of technological ability, population decline, loss of ability of regional industrial specialization, loss of military strategy and logistic ability, is not ethnocentrism. I'm not discussing the cultural evolution of the area or passing judgement or the cultural melting pot of the Italian peninsula with the influx of tribal confederations. I am taking about ability and societal metrics. While the decline of Western Europe has been overemphasized and almost romanticized, to pretend that it did not exist is simply revisionist and more than a little contrarian.
*****
All good points and definitely something for me to think about.
*****
I think the real "agenda" here is just to challenge existing paradigms and present a new, more accessible view. This isn't a bad thing and they don't presume to judge those who think differently, so I consider it a good thing. Those of us who chaffed all through school at Euro-centric "great man" history tend to find it a refreshing change.
Instead of thinking about these vids as having an agenda, try instead to view them as playing to a different demographic than that which history has served for decades (if not centuries) now.
It's not about "those nasty Europeans", just about how different parts of the world experienced different things at different times. It's about how the rest of us were not just savages doing nothing during those times when Europe stagnated and called it a Dark Age or some kind of pause button on development. Whether historians still use the term or not, most of society still considers it so, which is a detriment to those interested in a global perspective.
And, to those of us as interested in anthropology as history, as well as those of us not descending from white Europeans, those alternative views, will always be a wonderful and fascinating topic. It doesn't diminish the contributions Europe made, just reminds us that they weren't the only additions of import ever offered society.
I'm about 2 minutes in:
1) The Dark Ages usually only refer to the Early Middle Ages (at least nowadays it does), which runs from about the 600s to the 1000s (fall of Rome and Germanic Tribe Kingdoms up to Carolingian Empire and its fall, which led to the creation (somewhat) of the modern states of Western and Central Europe).
2) Feudalism (generally) was a political system. Manorialism (generally) was an economic system. Generally refers to the generality of the terms (like there were a bunch of different types of feudalism and manorialism), not that sometimes one was the other.
***** In general historical practice, Feudalism is the set of political relationships between actors in the Middle Ages, while Manorialism was the set of economic relationships between actors. Feudalism can appear to take on more of an economic aspect once inter-manor relations (like Noble-Noble relations) are the object of study, but that's just because trade wasn't as prevalent or defined in that period, so the political relationships necessarily took on more of an economic aspect.