Lmao their phony’s, their in the dark ages still ur a dumb American if you think they are more advanced then the us. Israel vs Russia. Israel wins in all categories. All them warheads Russia has, DUDS😂😂
@@saiko-no-kamiwell nobody declare that we have nukes but in reality most of the middle eastern countrys are developing nukes which is not great not only middle east turk and japan bangladesh have all the items that a nuke requires Myanmar is also trying to buy a nuke
Pretty accurate description tbh... The pre 1994 government didn't trust Mandela's ANC with nukes so dismantled all our nuclear weapons. Pretty good call given the current state of the nation.
You're just another young pup who thinks he knows everything, but really doesn't know a damn thing and is too stupid to shut your mouth and learn something before opening it again!
@@TheTwoFingeredBullDog what is the point of hiding it? Unless you don't have as much as you say, no one with half a brain would say they have less. They're not secret weapons. They're point is to scare the enemies and keep them away
Ah yes, let me call up Russia and ask them how many nukes they have, I shall get a good and trustworthy answer because countries are totally open about how many nukes they have
Have you ever heard of intelligence service ? You know today everyone knows pretty much everything that the others do. Why do you think the medias started to talk about Ukraine weeks before the war began ? We have satellites, infiltrated agents, hacking and all sorts of shit to know what's going on.
@@issoulescondes3913 So you think countries doesn't have secret weapons? How naive you are. Those nukes numbers doesn't matter. Russians have a lot of nukes but still living in poverty without free speech. Well spend money.
@@funnybunnies6536after the Soviet fell all the post Soviet countries like Ukraine and Kazakhstan have old Soviet silos in their territory but all the nukes have been returned to Russia
@@dddf27for treaties that meant Russia was supposed to respect their territorial boundaries, and that went well, should have let em keep their nukes, Russia would have never even gotten Crimea
Its very likely that they bluffed how much they had to try to scare mostly the U.S. and nato countries not to start anything funny. Its possible they were very close to the us amount in the 1980s
@@serbianwarrior5930 do you think that you can put nuclear bomb in a room and forget? But what about security, maintenance and other things? What if the missile explodes on the spot or is launched into an already programmed country?
The pre 1994 government voluntarily dismantled our nuclear weapons because they didn't trust Mandela's ANC with nukes. Probably for the best if you look at the state of the nation today...
@@becomingyeti8363 the nukes are stored in a high level security base, They were dismantled but the uranium that was used to assemble the nukes are still there that means south africa can easily become a nuclear power again but the no nuclear weapons treaty that south africa is in won't allow that to happen
South Africa developed a few nuclear bombs by the early 90s and deactivated them before the apartheid government relinquished power as they could tell the country would turn into what we see today and that wouldn’t be safe with nuclear weapons lying around, and they kinda faced a lot of international pressure as everyone kinda knew they had them.
@@thetad1242 “President F. W. de Klerk announced the dismantling of South Africa's nuclear weapons program to the South African Parliament on March 24, 1993. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) confirmed the complete dismantling of the program between April and August 1993.”
Anywhere from 100-200 nukes being used in like a year would end the world anyway. Anything over 250 is just like having 5,000 bullets in your house for “self protection” lol
You mean blasting bullets at the range for training. You only need like 10 rounds for self defense if you need more you’re either wanted for bounty like John wick or a terrible shot. Shooting is just another hobby.
@@Evan_Bell Really there is only one way to find out. The fact you would argue is sad. Kind of a weird pissing match considering nobody would want 100-200 nukes to be used at any given time. However, if your child or grandchildren have arms growing out of their forehead and you have proved me wrong….. good for you
@@seanfloyd4510 I'm simply correcting your misunderstanding and misinformation.. Calm down. Also, the use of 100-200 nukes would not result in a massive increase in the rate of birth defects. The total fission yield of a global nuclear exchange would only equal 3-4 times the fission yield of atmospheric nuclear tests. If you get upset by someone correcting you, don't state things you don't know to be true. If you're going to make claims, you have to be prepared to be mistaken and corrected. Sensible people don't get their knickers in a twist over that.
India be like mere sab se advanced launncher brahmos khud hi ghalti se launch ho jate hain name India's one successful indigenous weapon Pakistan has many like jf 17 and al khalid and ababeel missile
@@donjunalare you being taught in madarsa? Pakistan can't even manufacture a needle.. Jf17/ al khalid and missile are made in China and painted in Pakistan.. Nothing more than that
They're not hundreds of times bigger today than during the period the number of weapons in each country's arsenals were higher. The largest nuclear weapon ever deployed by the US was retired in 1976. It was more than 20 times the yield of their current largest weapon. For Russia, their largest ever deployed warhead was retired in 1986, and it's over 12 times the yield of anything they have now. For UK, 1970, an 11 fold yield reduction. France, 1991, 10-12 fold decrease. The exception among the NPT states is China, which deployed it's highest yield warhead in 1981, and hasn't yet retired it.
@@ahmermehmood1177 because of the decay of the neutron generator inside the nuclear weapons. Tritium is used as a neutron generator to initiate chain reaction. Tritium has a half life of 12 years. The US and Russia can always service their old stockpile if they want to.
Think about how much it would have cost to build and keep that many warheads. Russia was just on another level. However who knows how many were actually operable.
@@no-oneinparticular7264 honestly your not that far off. I think Russia exaggerated the number of warheads they had and it ended being really similar to what the US had during the 80s, so closer to 10-15k instead of over 30k
@@emperorofwar1 What makes you say that? They built that many to keep up with the United States. Once they realized it wasn't neccessary they started to get rid of them. Even if what you say is true they still more than enough.
Russia's conventional military maybe a joke but their nuclear power isn't, other than America only Russia has successfully tested the most number of nuclear weapons, both atomic and hydrogen. Russian nukes work and are operational, make no mistake about thag
What actually happened was that the nukes were built during apartheid and before apartheid ended the government quickly disabled them knowing that if the anc takes over and keeps the weapons they could just as well give a loaded gun to a 3 year old
The didn't own these rockets, the thing is that Russia is what is called the successor of USSR, because Russians also took all obligations for the debts of the USSR and the obligations of the USSR under international treaties, AND its place in the UN Security Council. Ukraine refused to pay on USSR debts, so they can't claim the property of the USSR just because it was placed on their territory before the collapse of the USSR. In short, it was Russian property on Ukrainian territory. Russia then showed all the caution needed (after all, this is a very dangerous weapon) and agreed with Ukraine to return these missiles without scandals, although it had every right to take away these missiles by right of ownership, but Ukraine was already known then for appropriating stuff that it never possessed, like, for example, the city of Sevastopol, which was a separate administrative unit of the USSR and was not part of the Republic of Crimea, which came under the jurisdiction of Ukraine. They basically annexed it in 1991. What goes around comes around I guess.
I once read that Russia can kill the population of the Earth 10 times, meaning they will kill you 9 times and the entire population of the Earth, and they still have enough to kill more.
5000 enough Russia or USA alone can destroy mankind. But it won't happen. Because many nukes may not explode at all or can be intercepted easily. Only a fraction of them will explode and take out billions of people
the dismantling might be partly from obsolence, and from higher yields. they make extra as back ups because they get targeted, but seems like you could send out your nukes before they got hit. the scariest thing for me is how clean fusion bombs are now. just another piece of artillery : (
No. The largest nuclear weapon ever deployed by the US was retired in 1976. It was more than 20 times the yield of their current largest weapon. For Russia, their largest ever deployed warhead was retired in 1986, and it's over 12 times the yield of anything they have now. For UK, 1970, an 11 fold yield reduction. France, 1991, 10-12 fold decrease. The exception among the NPT states is China, which deployed it's highest yield warhead in 1981, and hasn't yet retired it. Numbers go down, power goes down.
The whole Pakistan India rivalry seems so odd to me as an American, like you guys so similar yet hate each other so much (though I guess that’s not unique to that rivalry)
Fun fact: the yellow country which is Ukraine had nuclear weapons but USA,Russia,Uk and France said give up your nuclear weapons and you will never get a war with another country but Russia decided to declare a war against Ukraine that’s why the world with Ukraine
Others should stop threatening to use nukes on non nuclear nations before mouthing off to USA. Like China and Taiwan. Or China and Japan. Or Russia and Ukraine. Or Russia and the Baltics.
And how many nukes are active right now?😂 India Israel didn't increase quantity but they have more active nukes then Pakistan US have 5.5k nukes right now Russia 6.2k Most active nukes US 3.500 active nukes and spent over 33 billion dollars India spends 2 billion+ Pakistan 1 billion dollar+ Quantity don't matter that much the thing is matter is how many active nukes do you have and you legs behind everyone😂😂😂
@@chillipanda1638 Pakistan holds about 100-120 nuclear weapons, which can be delivered by aircraft and land-based missiles, while India's nuclear arsenal is around 90-110 nuclear weapons, according to estimates by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.
@@sfd4989 and what about SLBM?😂 Looks like you didn't understand what was my mean, the thing is Pakistan has more nukes but most of the nukes are stored in storing facilities when both attack immediately India can strike more nukes then Pakistan, you have to spent so much money to keep active your nukes so you can strike them more then your opponent, Pak spends 1B+ dollars, India spends 2B+ dollars, US is the king on this Race with spending of 33B+ Dollars and have 3.500 active nukes, But anyways India's nuke are useless because of No first use policy😂😂😂 Only two countries have this policy and those are India china They will never use their nukes first before their opponents
Pakistan holds about 100-120 nuclear weapons, which can be delivered by aircraft and land-based missiles, while India's nuclear arsenal is around 90-110 nuclear weapons, according to estimates by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.
@@hackero757 ek toh bc tumhare missiles k naam 😂😂 upar se yh pta h Pakistan k kaum ko ki unke paas koi bhi carrier nhi h ek bda nuke drop krne k liye? Bajwa sahab sutli li tarah aag lga k islamabad mein hi phod lenge xD
Usa:IM THE MOST Ussr and Russia join the group Usa:OH SHIT Meanwhile south africa South africa join the group And then South africa left from the group
Ты прежде, чем что-либо писать, включай мозги. Последующим поколениям слишком легко судить о событиях, чьими участниками они не были. Если на одного человека направили пистолет и выстрелили холостым, то человеку со стороны проще рассуждать об этом, чем человеку, который под дулом стоит и ожидает выстрела, не зная о том, заряжен холостой или боевой патрон
@ please borrow some internet if you have money. Oh yes google is not working in pak🤣. If you search in real internet browser you will see we have more nukes from June 2024.
@@devamparikh2343 nice dream now wake up please 😂😂😂😂😂😂 I think modi paid money to google then google says more nuke but in real Pakistan has 175 atom bomb and india has 165 more cry😉
@ lack of education you are ready to believe Indian media is wrong, google an American company is wrong. U are ready to believe the whole world is wrong and that the Indian PM gave money to google for showing that we have more nukes than you in every website in google that is actually made on the basis of facts, but a media in a country that is ruled by its army is right.😂😂 seriously that is why no one and I LITERALLY mean no one takes you guys seriously. What a bullshit in today’s time.
@@paulrichardson2554 Wikipedia is not an authentic source, also all these agencies do is just an estimate of capabilities. Nobody knows the exact number of Weapons a Country has.
Same applies to the US also. The triggers become useless after 10 years and need to be replaced. Russia can still have 40,000 nuclear weapons in no time. All those nuclear warheads from the Soviet Union era are still lying in the Russian stockpile. Just replace the neutron generator and that's it.
@@aditya-ml6km that’s if they had those numbers to begin with, that’s the issue they have been lying ever since ww2. And I can guarantee you America isn’t lying. If anything they are reporting numbers lower than what they have.
@@LastAlbino22 Ok, here we go again, Russians are lying, Americans aren't lying. Yeah, a typical American comment. Is your age less than 10? Do you have any idea how powerful the Soviet Union was? It's hard to have a discussion with people with narrow thinking.
@@aditya-ml6km not trying to be a dick. I’m currently in the Air Force, not to be biased, but I can assure you they weren’t as strong as you think and will never be again.
-South Africa joined the chat
-south Africa left the chat
Probably a good thing as they can't even keep the lights on in 2022.
@@johndonald3566 problem is the possession of enriched fuel
can anyone explain why nukes numbers are decreasing in this video
@@nitishchandel9980 nuke treaties and can’t properly maintain old nukes
@@cjdfnivdhfvvjngxdvk5929 lol
South Africa just wanted to feel what it felt like to be a nuclear state.
😂
Видимо, южной африке не понравилось это
They destroyed it when Nelson was freed
Before or after europeans raped the continent for resources??
@@Alisher_zhanser i was about to say that too😂😂
Russia be like : Hey guys wassup
lmfao for real
🇮🇳 Putin is a strong leader
@@DHANALAKSHMl putin is garbage 🗑️ crazy old man who is bad at acceptance and graditude practices
Lmao their phony’s, their in the dark ages still ur a dumb American if you think they are more advanced then the us. Israel vs Russia. Israel wins in all categories. All them warheads Russia has, DUDS😂😂
And India be like:
Yo bro, fine what about You..? ✌🏻😙
💪🏻🗿 Best frnds: 🇮🇳❣️🇷🇺
Just watching India and Pakistan just keeping pace is scary. Neighbors having an arms race for the number of nuclear weapons.
Russians and the US are neighbours, do you know?
India def has 3 or 4 times warheads as Pakistan. It doesn’t declare the true number. Since it has to face two nuclear powers at borders.
@@realnapster1522 And pakistan declares true number? No way lol. Both countries probably have similar numbers of Nukes.
@@saiko-no-kami but in Pakistan we test our shit. Indian warheads been growing rust on them😂😂👍🏼
@@saiko-no-kamiwell nobody declare that we have nukes but in reality most of the middle eastern countrys are developing nukes which is not great not only middle east turk and japan bangladesh have all the items that a nuke requires Myanmar is also trying to buy a nuke
*south africa joined the wrong voice chat*
We still have them
@@TheStevenredgate yea, but they are unoperatable. The government can bring those back but after the right funding!
@@artificialanimeuniverse5063 Oh nah. The idea of the anc having nukes is terrifying.
@@FictionHubZA yeah
NGL
@@artificialanimeuniverse5063considering South Africa can’t even keep the lights on. They probably can’t
America and russia go crazy on cold war
Yeah non of that shit works anymore people are dumb asf
Soviet
Stfu, uncultured western swine.
@@attran720f technically russia
@@attran720ftechnically both
South Africa is that bloke who nuts for the first time but then realises that he shouldn’t after post nut clarity.
Pretty accurate description tbh... The pre 1994 government didn't trust Mandela's ANC with nukes so dismantled all our nuclear weapons. Pretty good call given the current state of the nation.
We still have them, trust
theyre disarmed @@TheStevenredgate
Did a child type this out? What kinda joke is this
@@Aaron067Steve jobs 😅
Yes, the 1980s were pretty tense times for anyone with a clue.
And apparently the 2020s too
@@mshtysf4646 no. those wars were worse
Wow.....60,000 nukes between two countries!!!
What the heck were the world leaders thinking then???
World build on nukes (and with a evil smile 😊)
back then delivery systems for nukes were way less reliable so they had to have more nukes to compensate
Probably “fuck them commies” and “fuck those capitalist pigs”
Soviet nukes was to engage all of NATO so that's why their stockpile was quite ridiculous.
North Korea: *has 40+ nukes*
USA: *has 5500+ nukes*
Also USA: *threatening North Korea for having nukes*
You idiot
It's the other way around actually
The us is much more capable with nukes while North Korea is dangerous as they threaten anyone with nuclear weapons
@@shutupanddrink3960🤡
Na us never threatens, the opposite happens, check facts
No country would reveal how many nukes they have.
Yeah but every country is spying everyone else so yeah everyone knows how many nukes others have
You're just another young pup who thinks he knows everything, but really doesn't know a damn thing and is too stupid to shut your mouth and learn something before opening it again!
That's idiotic
@RR How? How many nukes China got exactly? How many nukes has north Korea got? Only what they tell you or let you inspect of course.
@@TheTwoFingeredBullDog what is the point of hiding it? Unless you don't have as much as you say, no one with half a brain would say they have less. They're not secret weapons. They're point is to scare the enemies and keep them away
Ah yes, let me call up Russia and ask them how many nukes they have, I shall get a good and trustworthy answer because countries are totally open about how many nukes they have
“yes our people are starving but we have more than our competitors combined we are safe”
@@ferretweasel6895 and your country is not poor and hungry??🤣funny stupid
Have you ever heard of intelligence service ? You know today everyone knows pretty much everything that the others do. Why do you think the medias started to talk about Ukraine weeks before the war began ? We have satellites, infiltrated agents, hacking and all sorts of shit to know what's going on.
@@issoulescondes3913 So you think countries doesn't have secret weapons? How naive you are. Those nukes numbers doesn't matter. Russians have a lot of nukes but still living in poverty without free speech. Well spend money.
@@shockme156 America got all kinds of food Russia got beef liver n sardines n you know it, maybe some potatoes during winter
I didn't know south africa also had nuclear weapons
yes thy had
Kazakhstan had it too so do Ukraine
@@dahabizizyboth cap
@@funnybunnies6536after the Soviet fell all the post Soviet countries like Ukraine and Kazakhstan have old Soviet silos in their territory but all the nukes have been returned to Russia
@@dddf27for treaties that meant Russia was supposed to respect their territorial boundaries, and that went well, should have let em keep their nukes, Russia would have never even gotten Crimea
It is such a valuable colony state so no wonder
Russia was 🗿 39000+ nukes hell no 💀
Soviet Union
@@aditya-ml6km soviet union is russia.
@@ioscracker4969 Soviet Union was not Russia. Russia was Soviet Union.
@@aditya-ml6km the end is the begining
Its very likely that they bluffed how much they had to try to scare mostly the U.S. and nato countries not to start anything funny. Its possible they were very close to the us amount in the 1980s
South Africa suddenly realise that he accidentally enters the wrong class😂
Hey Russia how many nukes do you really have?
Russia:”Blyat!”
🤣🤣🤣
😂😂😂😂
Дохуя
Blyat??????
@@callousrage9400 no, «дохуя» means «very much»
South Africa- ohh i entered to the wrong room, bye may see you later guys
Then why everyone is focusing on Iran? Every single one is a hypocritic peacekeepers, US, UK, ISRAEL, INDIA, PAKISTAN..list goes on.
and even France, sadly..
Because Iran want use it against Israel they said it even themselves
@@kid_toucher France gave Israelis the nukes
@@BIGDADDUI I know
Oh definitely, it is hypocritical. Not that I want more nukes or more countries with them, but the ones in power want to stay in power
That's the reason human is called most dangerous animal on this earth😐😶
Just because to impose ideology
Human are self destructive
Yea!
Quite frankly, all animals are dangerous since animals are territorial.
Especially humans with Islamic idiology is dangerous
north korea: ima make more missiles in one year
North Korea's economy: well well well... It's impossible.
@@UNKNOWN-fv1bi they don't care about economy as much as weapons since even Russia is borrowing from them, they sure got themselves armed enough.
The amount Russia had from the start is just outhaunt scary
Wait what happened to them. Why did it decrease?
It's kinda obvious. Rossia is like 'the main child' of Soviet Union, so everything that Soviet had, now belongs to Russia
@@malcolm7447 Really? It costs money to store them wtf?????
@@serbianwarrior5930 do you think that you can put nuclear bomb in a room and forget? But what about security, maintenance and other things? What if the missile explodes on the spot or is launched into an already programmed country?
@@jeomirit i didnt know that lol. I dont know much about nuclear weapons
south Africa be like: bruh i made one but I ain't doing this anymore
The pre 1994 government voluntarily dismantled our nuclear weapons because they didn't trust Mandela's ANC with nukes. Probably for the best if you look at the state of the nation today...
Because in 1990 apartheid was starting to end (it ended in 1994) and I think they gave them away or sold them during that period
@@becomingyeti8363 the nukes are stored in a high level security base, They were dismantled but the uranium that was used to assemble the nukes are still there that means south africa can easily become a nuclear power again but the no nuclear weapons treaty that south africa is in won't allow that to happen
@@becomingyeti8363 definitely not sold, we have the rockets in swatkops and the payloads in CPT
@@Me-mr8wk history bro
As A South African. It's Good That We Dont Have Nukes. We Can't Even Keep The Light On
Biggest mistake of Soviet Union was to over spend on nuclear bombs
Never knew South Africa once had nukes🤔
South Africa developed a few nuclear bombs by the early 90s and deactivated them before the apartheid government relinquished power as they could tell the country would turn into what we see today and that wouldn’t be safe with nuclear weapons lying around, and they kinda faced a lot of international pressure as everyone kinda knew they had them.
@@chaimlevin125you're lying but it's OK. 😂
@@buravan1512 It’s common knowledge….
@@chaimlevin125they were deactivated by Mandela but hey you can credit the apartheid government to make you feel better.
@@thetad1242 “President F. W. de Klerk announced the dismantling of South Africa's nuclear weapons program to the South African Parliament on March 24, 1993. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) confirmed the complete dismantling of the program between April and August 1993.”
Anywhere from 100-200 nukes being used in like a year would end the world anyway. Anything over 250 is just like having 5,000 bullets in your house for “self protection” lol
You mean blasting bullets at the range for training. You only need like 10 rounds for self defense if you need more you’re either wanted for bounty like John wick or a terrible shot. Shooting is just another hobby.
100-200 would not end the world.
@@Evan_Bell Really there is only one way to find out. The fact you would argue is sad. Kind of a weird pissing match considering nobody would want 100-200 nukes to be used at any given time. However, if your child or grandchildren have arms growing out of their forehead and you have proved me wrong….. good for you
@@seanfloyd4510 I'm simply correcting your misunderstanding and misinformation.. Calm down.
Also, the use of 100-200 nukes would not result in a massive increase in the rate of birth defects.
The total fission yield of a global nuclear exchange would only equal 3-4 times the fission yield of atmospheric nuclear tests.
If you get upset by someone correcting you, don't state things you don't know to be true.
If you're going to make claims, you have to be prepared to be mistaken and corrected. Sensible people don't get their knickers in a twist over that.
Shorts are so addicting! 🤤 Who else is on shorts marathon?
Love Pakistan from Russia ❤🇷🇺🇵🇰🤝💪
ThAnk u soo much bro 🙂❤......we Pakistani also love you Russian guys....and beautiful girls of Russia
😂😂 fake
😂
@@We..areGreat your Indian mind think it's fake lol 😂🙌💪😂
@@WhiteHorse-l4x Pakistan 😂 space VS Russia Space
😂 Elephant VS cat 🐈😂😂😂
Are u understand
@@We..areGreat dark short smelly Indian. Do you understand lol?🤣🤣🤣💩😂😂😂🙌
South Africa: “if they don’t remember I was here we’ll be good…. Right?”
Everyone else is reducing their amounts of nuclear weapons but North Korea is still cranking them out like hotcakes lol
Can we all just love one another instead of showing off our weapons of mass murder
Actually showing off has stopped many wars from happening. It shows how initiating a war might lead to total destruction
@@saarza9991 good point
Without those weapons of mass murder the world would be in constant WW2 like state
No.
Maybe one day. The war in ukrane shows us that people are tired of war.
Pakistan: Hold my weapons
No
Hahaha
True 🦋✨♥️
🤣🖕
93000 fantastic surrended 🤣🐷
Pakistan be like missile toh bana liya hai lekin launch kaise karu saare launchers toh made in China hain 😂😂
@justaguy.2789 arre India ki army waisi nahi hai ki talibaniyo se milke khud hi apne logo ko maare...😂😂
India be like mere sab se advanced launncher brahmos khud hi ghalti se launch ho jate hain name India's one successful indigenous weapon Pakistan has many like jf 17 and al khalid and ababeel missile
@@doridropubg9825made in china hai lekin teri maa ka phuda parh sakta hai. Bas es bath ki ghamand hai muje 💪
@@donjunalare you being taught in madarsa? Pakistan can't even manufacture a needle.. Jf17/ al khalid and missile are made in China and painted in Pakistan.. Nothing more than that
@justaguy.2789İDİOT İNDİAN LMAO 🤣😊.😊
China: “we’ll just hold on to ours, you know, just in case…”
They say the government of South Africa quickly got rid of their nuclear warheads as they foresaw the ANC was going to come into power.
less means nothing when they're 100s of times bigger
They're not hundreds of times bigger today than during the period the number of weapons in each country's arsenals were higher.
The largest nuclear weapon ever deployed by the US was retired in 1976. It was more than 20 times the yield of their current largest weapon.
For Russia, their largest ever deployed warhead was retired in 1986, and it's over 12 times the yield of anything they have now.
For UK, 1970, an 11 fold yield reduction.
France, 1991, 10-12 fold decrease.
The exception among the NPT states is China, which deployed it's highest yield warhead in 1981, and hasn't yet retired it.
Russia and China aren’t going to tell how many they actually have.
Because you must did the research and counted by yourself
The Americans aren’t either
Doesn't really matter. All 3 countries have enough to start nuclear winter.
No country gives actual no.
like the americans are going to.
Yet Iraq was invaded for WMDs
Total:0
Bruh you still believe US was helping people and humanity by disposing WoMD. Even if there were they would have seized it.
Pro gamer tip: you’d want to under report your nukes.
Everyone is reducing their nukes.
North Korea:
Why the nuclear warheads were decreasing 💀
Because now there is a limit for nuclear weapons.otherwise cold war ke time par Russia and America ke pass 40000 ke kareeb nuclear bombs the
@@ahmermehmood1177 Soviet Union not Russia
@@ahmermehmood1177 which is ridiculous lol to have so many lol.
@@ahmermehmood1177 because of the decay of the neutron generator inside the nuclear weapons. Tritium is used as a neutron generator to initiate chain reaction. Tritium has a half life of 12 years.
The US and Russia can always service their old stockpile if they want to.
Cause we started to lie about our strength.
Think about how much it would have cost to build and keep that many warheads. Russia was just on another level. However who knows how many were actually operable.
If they're like their other arms, half to two thirds won't work anyway!!
@@no-oneinparticular7264 honestly your not that far off.
I think Russia exaggerated the number of warheads they had and it ended being really similar to what the US had during the 80s, so closer to 10-15k instead of over 30k
@@no-oneinparticular7264 Even if that is the case that's still more than enough.
@@emperorofwar1 What makes you say that? They built that many to keep up with the United States. Once they realized it wasn't neccessary they started to get rid of them. Even if what you say is true they still more than enough.
Russia's conventional military maybe a joke but their nuclear power isn't, other than America only Russia has successfully tested the most number of nuclear weapons, both atomic and hydrogen. Russian nukes work and are operational, make no mistake about thag
South Africa was like I’m out Lmao
What actually happened was that the nukes were built during apartheid and before apartheid ended the government quickly disabled them knowing that if the anc takes over and keeps the weapons they could just as well give a loaded gun to a 3 year old
WTF 😡😡
@@tabisamakhebesele4859 sad but its true
@Wehraboer well with how things are with the anc government, this is a true statement.
south africa was so powerfull it didnt need nukes to win wars
South Africa - don’t fuck with us we’ve got nukes!
*Distant Russian laughter*
Thousands ???? What a crazy world
Thinking same 🤔
Putin : if you are bad, I am chad.
Ukraine accidentally had over 500 nuclear warheads after 1991 on accident and gave it back to
Russia
The didn't own these rockets, the thing is that Russia is what is called the successor of USSR, because Russians also took all obligations for the debts of the USSR and the obligations of the USSR under international treaties, AND its place in the UN Security Council. Ukraine refused to pay on USSR debts, so they can't claim the property of the USSR just because it was placed on their territory before the collapse of the USSR. In short, it was Russian property on Ukrainian territory. Russia then showed all the caution needed (after all, this is a very dangerous weapon) and agreed with Ukraine to return these missiles without scandals, although it had every right to take away these missiles by right of ownership, but Ukraine was already known then for appropriating stuff that it never possessed, like, for example, the city of Sevastopol, which was a separate administrative unit of the USSR and was not part of the Republic of Crimea, which came under the jurisdiction of Ukraine. They basically annexed it in 1991. What goes around comes around I guess.
While 1 nuclear bomb can level entire city. Why would any country feel need to own 2400 nuclear war heads. That is absolute madness
I once read that Russia can kill the population of the Earth 10 times, meaning they will kill you 9 times and the entire population of the Earth, and they still have enough to kill more.
It’s almost feels like a “if you use nukes ur gay” kinda moment 😅
How many nuclear missiles are needed to ultimately destroy mankind?
5000 enough Russia or USA alone can destroy mankind. But it won't happen. Because many nukes may not explode at all or can be intercepted easily. Only a fraction of them will explode and take out billions of people
A lot. World is much bigger than people think
If not completely physically certainly politically and militarily
250
A hurricane is far more destructive than a conventional nuke. Don't worry about nukes.
India be like mai kyy kru 😂😂😂
Nuclear Warheads
US 1945: 2
US August 1945: 0
I wonder where did two of them went
@@abcdefgh-hz6pk Japan
@@abcdefgh-hz6pk TO PAKISTAN 😊❤
Are these stats accurate? Please mention your source.
Can somebody tell why its getting reduced ?
Yes plz
According to abc news US and Russia each have over 5k , china with 350
Dont trust abc news
Soviet union had more then 45000 nukes
Where did you get that information from? Your ass?
just notice how much nuclear weapon was at soviet union… it’s terrifying yet it feels kind of good as a Russian
Like your special operation you mean? Yeah I have so much confidence in Russia. Good to see they're aren't just pumping out their chest.
@@mrdarren1045 wdym? i’m not the one who controls it it’s the government 😐
@@dietmountndew yeah but the govt is only as good as its compliant citizens. If we all refuses this crazy nonsense they wouldn't have a war to fight.
the dismantling might be partly from obsolence, and from higher yields. they make extra as back ups because they get targeted, but seems like you could send out your nukes before they got hit. the scariest thing for me is how clean fusion bombs are now. just another piece of artillery : (
Should do another comparison with 'Countries with the most WORKING nuclear warheads.'
What about Ukraine, Kazakhstan,Belarus? They had some nukes after fall of the USSR in 1991
Ukraine returned them to russia i guess
Kazakhstan sells NFuel USA, and all bombs to Russia
Lol, nukes were decreasing by years 🤣 😂 😅. We all know the nukes number is 10 or 20 times higher than estimated.
Of course we do....
Any PROOF, dickhead?
ua-cam.com/video/4G6e4TaJxkI/v-deo.html ! ! ! !.
@@Theineluctable_SOME_CANT Source: trust me
Because you think your lack of knowledges is better than this graphic?
You think you know that, because you’re the sad little child on the Internet who thinks it’s so exciting that armies are powerful
Russia: I can exzemple
US&russia : We can have nuclear weapons, but you can never have them.
Could having thousands of nuke be considered overkill?
Wow Pakistan have more nuclears than India 🇵🇰🔥🔥🔥❤️
Just 5 more
@@jyotiradityachoudhury7987 Pakistan Zindabad 🇵🇰🇵🇰♥️♥️
@@musawiralibaledai939 abe chøótiye india ke 2 nuke msi khatam hai bhikaristan😂
@@Alice-7777 cry pajit 🤡
💀Still Chinese Made!😂OnLy They Knows Hw Many Of Them Still Working
Numbers go down, powers go up!
No.
The largest nuclear weapon ever deployed by the US was retired in 1976. It was more than 20 times the yield of their current largest weapon.
For Russia, their largest ever deployed warhead was retired in 1986, and it's over 12 times the yield of anything they have now.
For UK, 1970, an 11 fold yield reduction.
France, 1991, 10-12 fold decrease.
The exception among the NPT states is China, which deployed it's highest yield warhead in 1981, and hasn't yet retired it.
Numbers go down, power goes down.
India and pakistan increasing it 💀
India just shows it has less nuclear wepon but Imdia has the capability to make 2000+ in a single go
How are the numbers decreasing????
Man , this is new for me
Big thanks to indian for making Pakistan Nuclear country.Thanks from my heart❤️🇵🇰
And big thanks to your father China for making us Nuclear country .....🇮🇳
@@S.Kumar98 😂 superb bro
@@S.Kumar98 🤣👍 Savage reply
Pakistans nukes will fall in Indias hand when Pakistan collapses. The whole of Pakistani army will be absorbed into Indian army 😂
The whole Pakistan India rivalry seems so odd to me as an American, like you guys so similar yet hate each other so much (though I guess that’s not unique to that rivalry)
I think Pakistan will cross all these countries because it has potential ..
In your dreams 😂.
Pakistan economy declined 20%
Pakistan currency is declining dude.
@@Justwanted-k6c cry about it😭🥩
@@HamzaKhanMangal u cry about loss of lives in recent floods in Pak
Even though if u have potential you have no money 😂
@Casanova
He is not
Its true Pakistan has lots of potential as its only Muslim country with nukes , it has help others like it did with NK
Fun fact: the yellow country which is Ukraine had nuclear weapons but USA,Russia,Uk and France said give up your nuclear weapons and you will never get a war with another country but Russia decided to declare a war against Ukraine that’s why the world with Ukraine
ukraine never had the codes to launch those weapons, they were soviet nukes stationed there
Why is Libya is missing from the chart?
USA should decrease its nuclear stockpile before not allowing other countries to develop nuclear weapons, and putting sanctions on them
Others should stop threatening to use nukes on non nuclear nations before mouthing off to USA.
Like China and Taiwan. Or China and Japan. Or Russia and Ukraine. Or Russia and the Baltics.
Sanctions? Lol. The US is broke. 31.6 trillion in debt
@@pawoon and still Texas is richer than Russia
They did reduce you bozo. And why do you want more nukes?
but they did?did you even watch the video.also nuclear powers dont want other nuclear powers.simple as that.
30000 nuclear bombs !!!🤯🤯🤯
Philippines a lot of nuclear bamboo type... Its a million pcs...🤪🤪🤪🤪
What happened to the 20K + nukes from 1977 did they inactive them
Number of warheads decreased means? What happened to those which were created?
Father of 🇮🇳 and isreal
The papa 🇵🇰Pakistan ❤❤❤❤🥰🥰
And how many nukes are active right now?😂
India Israel didn't increase quantity but they have more active nukes then Pakistan
US have 5.5k nukes right now
Russia 6.2k
Most active nukes
US 3.500 active nukes and spent over 33 billion dollars
India spends 2 billion+
Pakistan 1 billion dollar+
Quantity don't matter that much the thing is matter is how many active nukes do you have and you legs behind everyone😂😂😂
@@chillipanda1638 Pakistan holds about 100-120 nuclear weapons, which can be delivered by aircraft and land-based missiles, while India's nuclear arsenal is around 90-110 nuclear weapons, according to estimates by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.
@@sfd4989 and what about SLBM?😂
Looks like you didn't understand what was my mean, the thing is Pakistan has more nukes but most of the nukes are stored in storing facilities when both attack immediately India can strike more nukes then Pakistan, you have to spent so much money to keep active your nukes so you can strike them more then your opponent, Pak spends 1B+ dollars, India spends 2B+ dollars, US is the king on this
Race with spending of 33B+ Dollars and have 3.500 active nukes, But anyways India's nuke are useless because of No first use policy😂😂😂
Only two countries have this policy and those are India china
They will never use their nukes first before their opponents
@@chillipanda1638 pok
Where are the active power
😂😂😂 fathar kon hai world recod dekh lena 😂😂😂 1971 93000 saremdar 😂😂😂
Fire Crackers are more powerful than Pakistan nuclear missiles 😂
Pakistan holds about 100-120 nuclear weapons, which can be delivered by aircraft and land-based missiles, while India's nuclear arsenal is around 90-110 nuclear weapons, according to estimates by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.
And tipu 2 🤣😂😂
India's missiles suck.
@@hackero757 Bramhos is the currently most powerful nukes in the world.
@@hackero757 ek toh bc tumhare missiles k naam 😂😂 upar se yh pta h Pakistan k kaum ko ki unke paas koi bhi carrier nhi h ek bda nuke drop krne k liye? Bajwa sahab sutli li tarah aag lga k islamabad mein hi phod lenge xD
Usa:IM THE MOST
Ussr and Russia join the group
Usa:OH SHIT
Meanwhile south africa
South africa join the group
And then
South africa left from the group
Honestly, what do they even need that many for? That can destroy a small country.
Just wondering....why would you need 30k nukes?
To kill
To have more than your enemies and to try to say, if you kill us with nukes, we’ll kill you with larger and higher quantities of nukes.
2024: 2021:
Pakistan - 170 165
India - 174 156
india:-172
Pakistan:-174
185 actually to indias 180
100 is enough to bring the world back to ice age lol
Hahaha well it's not enough 🤣🤣😂😂
100 nukes woudn't even kill 20% of the world population
Yes 100 is Enough.
Today's Technology is Far Superior Than Previous Time.
Сделай потом утилизируй, ещё и храни отходы, пздц сколько денег, ещё две России отстроить можно было бы
Хоть одна адекватна людина в раші,риспект тобі чувак👍👍
Ты прежде, чем что-либо писать, включай мозги. Последующим поколениям слишком легко судить о событиях, чьими участниками они не были.
Если на одного человека направили пистолет и выстрелили холостым, то человеку со стороны проще рассуждать об этом, чем человеку, который под дулом стоит и ожидает выстрела, не зная о том, заряжен холостой или боевой патрон
@@marat_user9133 вернись в палату по названием крисия
@@alexandr2640 скорей вишиватна,это гарантия нашей безопасности,а ты радуйся ##### скоро вова все исправит👍
Now show one where it illustrates who has the fuel and delivery systems to field the most warhead taking into account total payload.
Update: As of 2024 November India had more nukes than Pak
2024
Pak 174
India 172
@ please borrow some internet if you have money. Oh yes google is not working in pak🤣. If you search in real internet browser you will see we have more nukes from June 2024.
@@devamparikh2343 nice joke 😂😂😂😂 modi paid money then google says more nuke in india but real pakistan have 175 atom bomb and india have 165😉 more cry
@@devamparikh2343 nice dream now wake up please 😂😂😂😂😂😂 I think modi paid money to google then google says more nuke but in real Pakistan has 175 atom bomb and india has 165 more cry😉
@ lack of education you are ready to believe Indian media is wrong, google an American company is wrong. U are ready to believe the whole world is wrong and that the Indian PM gave money to google for showing that we have more nukes than you in every website in google that is actually made on the basis of facts, but a media in a country that is ruled by its army is right.😂😂 seriously that is why no one and I LITERALLY mean no one takes you guys seriously. What a bullshit in today’s time.
How about a nice game of chess instead?
Nah football is better
e4
@@shimonmizrahi6356 Ten yard penalty for missed “Wargames” reference.
It only take one remember that
Not exactly true
@@reiss5669 What does she means?
What about Japan? Two wasn't enough
@@jsemslava7880 one isn't enough but 100+ are dangerous and remember nuclear weapons are more powerful nowadays
Not at all 😭
Source : Trust Me Bro...
Are you blind?
@@paulrichardson2554 Nope, but I need a source where India Pakistan or any Country has declared the number of nuclear warheads they have.
@@AS-qt2qx Look in the bottom left corner.
You don't need a country to tell you how many nukes they have to know it, have you ever heard of secret intelligence services ? You know, spying ?
@@paulrichardson2554 Wikipedia is not an authentic source, also all these agencies do is just an estimate of capabilities. Nobody knows the exact number of Weapons a Country has.
What app
Where did all those nukes go?
Funniest part is Russia probably has a fraction of what they claim
Most of them may not be functional as well.
Same applies to the US also. The triggers become useless after 10 years and need to be replaced.
Russia can still have 40,000 nuclear weapons in no time. All those nuclear warheads from the Soviet Union era are still lying in the Russian stockpile. Just replace the neutron generator and that's it.
@@aditya-ml6km that’s if they had those numbers to begin with, that’s the issue they have been lying ever since ww2. And I can guarantee you America isn’t lying. If anything they are reporting numbers lower than what they have.
@@LastAlbino22 Ok, here we go again, Russians are lying, Americans aren't lying. Yeah, a typical American comment.
Is your age less than 10? Do you have any idea how powerful the Soviet Union was?
It's hard to have a discussion with people with narrow thinking.
@@aditya-ml6km not trying to be a dick. I’m currently in the Air Force, not to be biased, but I can assure you they weren’t as strong as you think and will never be again.
Good progress.
Bad process ,I don't want to die
@@RINGTONE_XE drink muutr😁
@@RINGTONE_XE Better than Linduosm 🐷
@@hackero757 still bhikaristan😂lol pakistan- a country where you cannot choose your leader xD still calling itself republic
Peace cuts into piece
👍
That's catchy.
Creative
Asia would instantly turn into a bloodbath without nuclear weapons
Wait, why they have less nukes