Lmao their phony’s, their in the dark ages still ur a dumb American if you think they are more advanced then the us. Israel vs Russia. Israel wins in all categories. All them warheads Russia has, DUDS😂😂
Its very likely that they bluffed how much they had to try to scare mostly the U.S. and nato countries not to start anything funny. Its possible they were very close to the us amount in the 1980s
Pretty accurate description tbh... The pre 1994 government didn't trust Mandela's ANC with nukes so dismantled all our nuclear weapons. Pretty good call given the current state of the nation.
@@saiko-no-kamiwell nobody declare that we have nukes but in reality most of the middle eastern countrys are developing nukes which is not great not only middle east turk and japan bangladesh have all the items that a nuke requires Myanmar is also trying to buy a nuke
Ah yes, let me call up Russia and ask them how many nukes they have, I shall get a good and trustworthy answer because countries are totally open about how many nukes they have
Have you ever heard of intelligence service ? You know today everyone knows pretty much everything that the others do. Why do you think the medias started to talk about Ukraine weeks before the war began ? We have satellites, infiltrated agents, hacking and all sorts of shit to know what's going on.
@@issoulescondes3913 So you think countries doesn't have secret weapons? How naive you are. Those nukes numbers doesn't matter. Russians have a lot of nukes but still living in poverty without free speech. Well spend money.
You're just another young pup who thinks he knows everything, but really doesn't know a damn thing and is too stupid to shut your mouth and learn something before opening it again!
@@TheTwoFingeredBulldog what is the point of hiding it? Unless you don't have as much as you say, no one with half a brain would say they have less. They're not secret weapons. They're point is to scare the enemies and keep them away
The didn't own these rockets, the thing is that Russia is what is called the successor of USSR, because Russians also took all obligations for the debts of the USSR and the obligations of the USSR under international treaties, AND its place in the UN Security Council. Ukraine refused to pay on USSR debts, so they can't claim the property of the USSR just because it was placed on their territory before the collapse of the USSR. In short, it was Russian property on Ukrainian territory. Russia then showed all the caution needed (after all, this is a very dangerous weapon) and agreed with Ukraine to return these missiles without scandals, although it had every right to take away these missiles by right of ownership, but Ukraine was already known then for appropriating stuff that it never possessed, like, for example, the city of Sevastopol, which was a separate administrative unit of the USSR and was not part of the Republic of Crimea, which came under the jurisdiction of Ukraine. They basically annexed it in 1991. What goes around comes around I guess.
That's not true. Did you just imagine that would be the case, then state it as fact? The largest nuclear weapon ever deployed by the US was retired in 1976. It was more than 20 times the yield of their current largest weapon. For Russia, their largest ever deployed warhead was retired in 1986, and it's over 12 times the yield of anything they have now. For UK, 1970, an 11 fold yield reduction. France, 1991, 10-12 fold decrease. The exception among the NPT states is China, which deployed it's highest yield warhead in 1981, and hasn't yet retired it.
Nuclear missiles Weaponries warheads are😢Causing totally in Death only 😢.Doesn’t really matter that its Nuclear Warhead tips at all it more or less powerful Nuclear missiles warheads.If ours humanity ever started WW3 with Nuclear Warfare?The planet 🌎 earth are dying and will be dead ☠️ soon at those moments as Numbers missiles of Nuclear missiles tips are starting to flying all over planet 🌎 continents.
@@cmdrgarbage1895 he is speaking truth for example nuclear bomb can divide in to 2 parts atomic bomb and tharmo nuclear bomb. Uranium bomb , plutonium, , are atomic bomb all of nuclear countries don't hold all types of nuclear bomb for example there is 9 nuclear countries but all of them have Uranium bomb.
@@cmdrgarbage1895 7 have plutonium bomb(usa Russia uk india franch China Pakistan) 6 have hydrogen/tharmo nuclear bomb bomb (usa Russia China India UK. France )
@@funnybunnies6536after the Soviet fell all the post Soviet countries like Ukraine and Kazakhstan have old Soviet silos in their territory but all the nukes have been returned to Russia
They made them secretly. Probably a lot of other countries out here too with some secret nukes up their sleeve. Israel has never even confirmed they have nukes but they definitely do. I bet most of the Scandinavian countries have them too. Brazil is a maybe as well. You just have to build a big underground bunker and make them there so nobody sees
@@dddf27for treaties that meant Russia was supposed to respect their territorial boundaries, and that went well, should have let em keep their nukes, Russia would have never even gotten Crimea
The pre 1994 government voluntarily dismantled our nuclear weapons because they didn't trust Mandela's ANC with nukes. Probably for the best if you look at the state of the nation today...
@@becomingyeti8363 the nukes are stored in a high level security base, They were dismantled but the uranium that was used to assemble the nukes are still there that means south africa can easily become a nuclear power again but the no nuclear weapons treaty that south africa is in won't allow that to happen
South Africa developed a few nuclear bombs by the early 90s and deactivated them before the apartheid government relinquished power as they could tell the country would turn into what we see today and that wouldn’t be safe with nuclear weapons lying around, and they kinda faced a lot of international pressure as everyone kinda knew they had them.
@@serbianwarrior5930 do you think that you can put nuclear bomb in a room and forget? But what about security, maintenance and other things? What if the missile explodes on the spot or is launched into an already programmed country?
I once read that Russia can kill the population of the Earth 10 times, meaning they will kill you 9 times and the entire population of the Earth, and they still have enough to kill more.
Anywhere from 100-200 nukes being used in like a year would end the world anyway. Anything over 250 is just like having 5,000 bullets in your house for “self protection” lol
You mean blasting bullets at the range for training. You only need like 10 rounds for self defense if you need more you’re either wanted for bounty like John wick or a terrible shot. Shooting is just another hobby.
@@Evan_Bell Really there is only one way to find out. The fact you would argue is sad. Kind of a weird pissing match considering nobody would want 100-200 nukes to be used at any given time. However, if your child or grandchildren have arms growing out of their forehead and you have proved me wrong….. good for you
@@seanfloyd4510 I'm simply correcting your misunderstanding and misinformation.. Calm down. Also, the use of 100-200 nukes would not result in a massive increase in the rate of birth defects. The total fission yield of a global nuclear exchange would only equal 3-4 times the fission yield of atmospheric nuclear tests. If you get upset by someone correcting you, don't state things you don't know to be true. If you're going to make claims, you have to be prepared to be mistaken and corrected. Sensible people don't get their knickers in a twist over that.
What actually happened was that the nukes were built during apartheid and before apartheid ended the government quickly disabled them knowing that if the anc takes over and keeps the weapons they could just as well give a loaded gun to a 3 year old
Pakistan holds about 100-120 nuclear weapons, which can be delivered by aircraft and land-based missiles, while India's nuclear arsenal is around 90-110 nuclear weapons, according to estimates by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.
@@hackero757 ek toh bc tumhare missiles k naam 😂😂 upar se yh pta h Pakistan k kaum ko ki unke paas koi bhi carrier nhi h ek bda nuke drop krne k liye? Bajwa sahab sutli li tarah aag lga k islamabad mein hi phod lenge xD
They're not hundreds of times bigger today than during the period the number of weapons in each country's arsenals were higher. The largest nuclear weapon ever deployed by the US was retired in 1976. It was more than 20 times the yield of their current largest weapon. For Russia, their largest ever deployed warhead was retired in 1986, and it's over 12 times the yield of anything they have now. For UK, 1970, an 11 fold yield reduction. France, 1991, 10-12 fold decrease. The exception among the NPT states is China, which deployed it's highest yield warhead in 1981, and hasn't yet retired it.
India be like :ab Kaise Pakistan py blame maaru unke pas Toh nukes hai ab kaise kashmiriyo py Zulum karu phir Pakistan py blame maaru Mai Toh mar gya Bachao Bhagwan
India be like mere sab se advanced launncher brahmos khud hi ghalti se launch ho jate hain name India's one successful indigenous weapon Pakistan has many like jf 17 and al khalid and ababeel missile
@@donjunalare you being taught in madarsa? Pakistan can't even manufacture a needle.. Jf17/ al khalid and missile are made in China and painted in Pakistan.. Nothing more than that
The whole Pakistan India rivalry seems so odd to me as an American, like you guys so similar yet hate each other so much (though I guess that’s not unique to that rivalry)
People don’t understand that it doesn’t matter how many warheads you have what matters is how powerful are the warheads and strategy on when your gonna launch it 💯💯💯💯
Think about how much it would have cost to build and keep that many warheads. Russia was just on another level. However who knows how many were actually operable.
@@no-oneinparticular7264 honestly your not that far off. I think Russia exaggerated the number of warheads they had and it ended being really similar to what the US had during the 80s, so closer to 10-15k instead of over 30k
@@emperorofwar1 What makes you say that? They built that many to keep up with the United States. Once they realized it wasn't neccessary they started to get rid of them. Even if what you say is true they still more than enough.
Russia's conventional military maybe a joke but their nuclear power isn't, other than America only Russia has successfully tested the most number of nuclear weapons, both atomic and hydrogen. Russian nukes work and are operational, make no mistake about thag
@@shanahmad3974Ye life me toh possible ni he ki Bharat ko hara do bhaijaan. Ye baat tumhe v pata he,mana ki accept karna sharumnaak hogi,par ab sach he toh he. Kitni ladai dekh chuke,parinaam ek hi he.
the dismantling might be partly from obsolence, and from higher yields. they make extra as back ups because they get targeted, but seems like you could send out your nukes before they got hit. the scariest thing for me is how clean fusion bombs are now. just another piece of artillery : (
Im sure there were other factors at play (like icbm count) but the soviet production is incredibly impressive. Im glad that the cold war didn't turn hot
Fun fact: the yellow country which is Ukraine had nuclear weapons but USA,Russia,Uk and France said give up your nuclear weapons and you will never get a war with another country but Russia decided to declare a war against Ukraine that’s why the world with Ukraine
it doesn't matter how many they have 1000 is more than enough to end human once and for all. The eco system after nuclear fall out would be able so sustain fragile creature like us.
No. The largest nuclear weapon ever deployed by the US was retired in 1976. It was more than 20 times the yield of their current largest weapon. For Russia, their largest ever deployed warhead was retired in 1986, and it's over 12 times the yield of anything they have now. For UK, 1970, an 11 fold yield reduction. France, 1991, 10-12 fold decrease. The exception among the NPT states is China, which deployed it's highest yield warhead in 1981, and hasn't yet retired it. Numbers go down, power goes down.
Hello, they were simply redesigned and some more of the 30,000 thousand nuclear warheads became unusable and But they could be used as fuel for nuclear power plants
5000 enough Russia or USA alone can destroy mankind. But it won't happen. Because many nukes may not explode at all or can be intercepted easily. Only a fraction of them will explode and take out billions of people
-South Africa joined the chat
-south Africa left the chat
Probably a good thing as they can't even keep the lights on in 2022.
@@johndonald3566 problem is the possession of enriched fuel
can anyone explain why nukes numbers are decreasing in this video
@@nitishchandel9980 nuke treaties and can’t properly maintain old nukes
@@cjdfnivdhfvvjngxdvk5929 lol
South Africa just wanted to feel what it felt like to be a nuclear state.
😂
Видимо, южной африке не понравилось это
They destroyed it when Nelson was freed
Before or after europeans raped the continent for resources??
@@Alisher_zhanser i was about to say that too😂😂
Russia be like : Hey guys wassup
lmfao for real
🇮🇳 Putin is a strong leader
@@DHANALAKSHMl putin is garbage 🗑️ crazy old man who is bad at acceptance and graditude practices
Lmao their phony’s, their in the dark ages still ur a dumb American if you think they are more advanced then the us. Israel vs Russia. Israel wins in all categories. All them warheads Russia has, DUDS😂😂
And India be like:
Yo bro, fine what about You..? ✌🏻😙
💪🏻🗿 Best frnds: 🇮🇳❣️🇷🇺
*south africa joined the wrong voice chat*
We still have them
@@TheStevenredgate yea, but they are unoperatable. The government can bring those back but after the right funding!
@@artificialanimeuniverse5063 Oh nah. The idea of the anc having nukes is terrifying.
@@ElectrostatiCrow yeah
NGL
@@artificialanimeuniverse5063considering South Africa can’t even keep the lights on. They probably can’t
Russia was 🗿 39000+ nukes hell no 💀
Soviet Union
@@aditya-ml6km soviet union is russia.
@@ioscracker4969 Soviet Union was not Russia. Russia was Soviet Union.
@@aditya-ml6km the end is the begining
Its very likely that they bluffed how much they had to try to scare mostly the U.S. and nato countries not to start anything funny. Its possible they were very close to the us amount in the 1980s
America and russia go crazy on cold war
Yeah non of that shit works anymore people are dumb asf
Soviet
Stfu, uncultured western swine.
@@attran720f technically russia
@@attran720ftechnically both
Yes, the 1980s were pretty tense times for anyone with a clue.
And apparently the 2020s too
@@mshtysf4646 no. those wars were worse
South Africa is that bloke who nuts for the first time but then realises that he shouldn’t after post nut clarity.
Pretty accurate description tbh... The pre 1994 government didn't trust Mandela's ANC with nukes so dismantled all our nuclear weapons. Pretty good call given the current state of the nation.
We still have them, trust
theyre disarmed @@TheStevenredgate
Did a child type this out? What kinda joke is this
Just watching India and Pakistan just keeping pace is scary. Neighbors having an arms race for the number of nuclear weapons.
Russians and the US are neighbours, do you know?
India def has 3 or 4 times warheads as Pakistan. It doesn’t declare the true number. Since it has to face two nuclear powers at borders.
@@realnapster1522 And pakistan declares true number? No way lol. Both countries probably have similar numbers of Nukes.
@@saiko-no-kami but in Pakistan we test our shit. Indian warheads been growing rust on them😂😂👍🏼
@@saiko-no-kamiwell nobody declare that we have nukes but in reality most of the middle eastern countrys are developing nukes which is not great not only middle east turk and japan bangladesh have all the items that a nuke requires Myanmar is also trying to buy a nuke
Ah yes, let me call up Russia and ask them how many nukes they have, I shall get a good and trustworthy answer because countries are totally open about how many nukes they have
“yes our people are starving but we have more than our competitors combined we are safe”
@@ferretweasel6895 and your country is not poor and hungry??🤣funny stupid
Have you ever heard of intelligence service ? You know today everyone knows pretty much everything that the others do. Why do you think the medias started to talk about Ukraine weeks before the war began ? We have satellites, infiltrated agents, hacking and all sorts of shit to know what's going on.
@@issoulescondes3913 So you think countries doesn't have secret weapons? How naive you are. Those nukes numbers doesn't matter. Russians have a lot of nukes but still living in poverty without free speech. Well spend money.
@@shockme156 America got all kinds of food Russia got beef liver n sardines n you know it, maybe some potatoes during winter
That's the reason human is called most dangerous animal on this earth😐😶
Just because to impose ideology
Human are self destructive
Yea!
Quite frankly, all animals are dangerous since animals are territorial.
Especially humans with Islamic idiology is dangerous
Hey Russia how many nukes do you really have?
Russia:”Blyat!”
🤣🤣🤣
😂😂😂😂
Дохуя
Blyat??????
@@callousrage9400 no, «дохуя» means «very much»
Wow.....60,000 nukes between two countries!!!
What the heck were the world leaders thinking then???
World build on nukes (and with a evil smile 😊)
back then delivery systems for nukes were way less reliable so they had to have more nukes to compensate
Probably “fuck them commies” and “fuck those capitalist pigs”
Soviet nukes was to engage all of NATO so that's why their stockpile was quite ridiculous.
No country would reveal how many nukes they have.
Yeah but every country is spying everyone else so yeah everyone knows how many nukes others have
You're just another young pup who thinks he knows everything, but really doesn't know a damn thing and is too stupid to shut your mouth and learn something before opening it again!
That's idiotic
@RR How? How many nukes China got exactly? How many nukes has north Korea got? Only what they tell you or let you inspect of course.
@@TheTwoFingeredBulldog what is the point of hiding it? Unless you don't have as much as you say, no one with half a brain would say they have less. They're not secret weapons. They're point is to scare the enemies and keep them away
North Korea: *has 40+ nukes*
USA: *has 5500+ nukes*
Also USA: *threatening North Korea for having nukes*
You idiot
It's the other way around actually
The us is much more capable with nukes while North Korea is dangerous as they threaten anyone with nuclear weapons
@@shutupanddrink3960🤡
Na us never threatens, the opposite happens, check facts
Ukraine accidentally had over 500 nuclear warheads after 1991 on accident and gave it back to
Russia
The didn't own these rockets, the thing is that Russia is what is called the successor of USSR, because Russians also took all obligations for the debts of the USSR and the obligations of the USSR under international treaties, AND its place in the UN Security Council. Ukraine refused to pay on USSR debts, so they can't claim the property of the USSR just because it was placed on their territory before the collapse of the USSR. In short, it was Russian property on Ukrainian territory. Russia then showed all the caution needed (after all, this is a very dangerous weapon) and agreed with Ukraine to return these missiles without scandals, although it had every right to take away these missiles by right of ownership, but Ukraine was already known then for appropriating stuff that it never possessed, like, for example, the city of Sevastopol, which was a separate administrative unit of the USSR and was not part of the Republic of Crimea, which came under the jurisdiction of Ukraine. They basically annexed it in 1991. What goes around comes around I guess.
Yes, the world has less nuclear warheads now than before, but each nuclear warheads today is thousands times deadlier than ever before.
That's not true. Did you just imagine that would be the case, then state it as fact?
The largest nuclear weapon ever deployed by the US was retired in 1976. It was more than 20 times the yield of their current largest weapon.
For Russia, their largest ever deployed warhead was retired in 1986, and it's over 12 times the yield of anything they have now.
For UK, 1970, an 11 fold yield reduction.
France, 1991, 10-12 fold decrease.
The exception among the NPT states is China, which deployed it's highest yield warhead in 1981, and hasn't yet retired it.
Nuclear missiles Weaponries warheads are😢Causing totally in Death only 😢.Doesn’t really matter that its Nuclear Warhead tips at all it more or less powerful Nuclear missiles warheads.If ours humanity ever started WW3 with Nuclear Warfare?The planet 🌎 earth are dying and will be dead ☠️ soon at those moments as Numbers missiles of Nuclear missiles tips are starting to flying all over planet 🌎 continents.
Why do you lie?
@@cmdrgarbage1895 he is speaking truth for example nuclear bomb can divide in to 2 parts
atomic bomb and tharmo nuclear bomb. Uranium bomb , plutonium, , are atomic bomb all of nuclear countries don't hold all types of nuclear bomb for example there is 9 nuclear countries but all of them have Uranium bomb.
@@cmdrgarbage1895 7 have plutonium bomb(usa Russia uk india franch China Pakistan) 6 have hydrogen/tharmo nuclear bomb bomb (usa Russia China India UK. France )
I didn't know south africa also had nuclear weapons
yes thy had
Kazakhstan had it too so do Ukraine
@@dahabizizyboth cap
@@funnybunnies6536after the Soviet fell all the post Soviet countries like Ukraine and Kazakhstan have old Soviet silos in their territory but all the nukes have been returned to Russia
They made them secretly. Probably a lot of other countries out here too with some secret nukes up their sleeve. Israel has never even confirmed they have nukes but they definitely do. I bet most of the Scandinavian countries have them too. Brazil is a maybe as well. You just have to build a big underground bunker and make them there so nobody sees
@@dddf27for treaties that meant Russia was supposed to respect their territorial boundaries, and that went well, should have let em keep their nukes, Russia would have never even gotten Crimea
north korea: ima make more missiles in one year
South Africa- ohh i entered to the wrong room, bye may see you later guys
south Africa be like: bruh i made one but I ain't doing this anymore
The pre 1994 government voluntarily dismantled our nuclear weapons because they didn't trust Mandela's ANC with nukes. Probably for the best if you look at the state of the nation today...
Because in 1990 apartheid was starting to end (it ended in 1994) and I think they gave them away or sold them during that period
@@becomingyeti8363 the nukes are stored in a high level security base, They were dismantled but the uranium that was used to assemble the nukes are still there that means south africa can easily become a nuclear power again but the no nuclear weapons treaty that south africa is in won't allow that to happen
@@becomingyeti8363 definitely not sold, we have the rockets in swatkops and the payloads in CPT
@@Me-mr8wk history bro
Never knew South Africa once had nukes🤔
South Africa developed a few nuclear bombs by the early 90s and deactivated them before the apartheid government relinquished power as they could tell the country would turn into what we see today and that wouldn’t be safe with nuclear weapons lying around, and they kinda faced a lot of international pressure as everyone kinda knew they had them.
@@chaimlevin125you're lying but it's OK. 😂
@@buravan1512 It’s common knowledge….
The amount Russia had from the start is just outhaunt scary
Wait what happened to them. Why did it decrease?
It's kinda obvious. Rossia is like 'the main child' of Soviet Union, so everything that Soviet had, now belongs to Russia
@@malcolm7447 Really? It costs money to store them wtf?????
@@serbianwarrior5930 do you think that you can put nuclear bomb in a room and forget? But what about security, maintenance and other things? What if the missile explodes on the spot or is launched into an already programmed country?
@@jeomirit i didnt know that lol. I dont know much about nuclear weapons
Love Pakistan from Russia ❤🇷🇺🇵🇰🤝💪
ThAnk u soo much bro 🙂❤......we Pakistani also love you Russian guys....and beautiful girls of Russia
😂😂 fake
😂
@@PUTIN__BASUMATARY your Indian mind think it's fake lol 😂🙌💪😂
@@user-pf2nb6ew9p Pakistan 😂 space VS Russia Space
😂 Elephant VS cat 🐈😂😂😂
Are u understand
@@PUTIN__BASUMATARY dark short smelly Indian. Do you understand lol?🤣🤣🤣💩😂😂😂🙌
Shorts are so addicting! 🤤 Who else is on shorts marathon?
Nuclear Warheads
US 1945: 2
US August 1945: 0
I wonder where did two of them went
@@abcdefgh-hz6pk Japan
@@abcdefgh-hz6pk TO PAKISTAN 😊❤
While 1 nuclear bomb can level entire city. Why would any country feel need to own 2400 nuclear war heads. That is absolute madness
I once read that Russia can kill the population of the Earth 10 times, meaning they will kill you 9 times and the entire population of the Earth, and they still have enough to kill more.
Wow Pakistan have more nuclears than India 🇵🇰🔥🔥🔥❤️
Just 5 more
@@jyotiradityachoudhury7987 Pakistan Zindabad 🇵🇰🇵🇰♥️♥️
@@musawiralibaledai939 abe chøótiye india ke 2 nuke msi khatam hai bhikaristan😂
@@Alice-7777 cry pajit 🤡
💀Still Chinese Made!😂OnLy They Knows Hw Many Of Them Still Working
Then why everyone is focusing on Iran? Every single one is a hypocritic peacekeepers, US, UK, ISRAEL, INDIA, PAKISTAN..list goes on.
and even France, sadly..
Because Iran want use it against Israel they said it even themselves
@@kid_toucher France gave Israelis the nukes
@@ddarkon1223 I know
Oh definitely, it is hypocritical. Not that I want more nukes or more countries with them, but the ones in power want to stay in power
Russia and US: *decreasing nuclear warheads because they are a threat to humanity*
China:
*allow me to introduce myself....*
North Korea too.
Lol dude stop beint deluded. They did not "decrease" Nuclear warheads for "peace".
South Africa: “if they don’t remember I was here we’ll be good…. Right?”
Pakistan🇵🇰💪
default 😂
😅😅😅
🇧🇩❤️🇵🇰
No hate to any countries 🇮🇳❤️🇵🇰
Gobarkhao
Anywhere from 100-200 nukes being used in like a year would end the world anyway. Anything over 250 is just like having 5,000 bullets in your house for “self protection” lol
You mean blasting bullets at the range for training. You only need like 10 rounds for self defense if you need more you’re either wanted for bounty like John wick or a terrible shot. Shooting is just another hobby.
100-200 would not end the world.
@@Evan_Bell Really there is only one way to find out. The fact you would argue is sad. Kind of a weird pissing match considering nobody would want 100-200 nukes to be used at any given time. However, if your child or grandchildren have arms growing out of their forehead and you have proved me wrong….. good for you
@@seanfloyd4510 I'm simply correcting your misunderstanding and misinformation.. Calm down.
Also, the use of 100-200 nukes would not result in a massive increase in the rate of birth defects.
The total fission yield of a global nuclear exchange would only equal 3-4 times the fission yield of atmospheric nuclear tests.
If you get upset by someone correcting you, don't state things you don't know to be true.
If you're going to make claims, you have to be prepared to be mistaken and corrected. Sensible people don't get their knickers in a twist over that.
South Africa was like I’m out Lmao
What actually happened was that the nukes were built during apartheid and before apartheid ended the government quickly disabled them knowing that if the anc takes over and keeps the weapons they could just as well give a loaded gun to a 3 year old
WTF 😡😡
@@tabisamakhebesele4859 sad but its true
@Wehraboer well with how things are with the anc government, this is a true statement.
As A South African. It's Good That We Dont Have Nukes. We Can't Even Keep The Light On
South Africa suddenly realise that he accidentally enters the wrong class😂
Pakistan 🇵🇰
Terroristan
Al.kareemullah ileh al nematullahe watan
You also need launcher for them😂
@@moon4ums we have. no tension baby.
We have ababeel(MIRV).
NASR.
Shaheen etc....
😂😂😂😂
They say the government of South Africa quickly got rid of their nuclear warheads as they foresaw the ANC was going to come into power.
Can we all just love one another instead of showing off our weapons of mass murder
Actually showing off has stopped many wars from happening. It shows how initiating a war might lead to total destruction
@@saarza9991 good point
Without those weapons of mass murder the world would be in constant WW2 like state
No.
Maybe one day. The war in ukrane shows us that people are tired of war.
Fire Crackers are more powerful than Pakistan nuclear missiles 😂
Pakistan holds about 100-120 nuclear weapons, which can be delivered by aircraft and land-based missiles, while India's nuclear arsenal is around 90-110 nuclear weapons, according to estimates by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.
And tipu 2 🤣😂😂
India's missiles suck.
@@hackero757 Bramhos is the currently most powerful nukes in the world.
@@hackero757 ek toh bc tumhare missiles k naam 😂😂 upar se yh pta h Pakistan k kaum ko ki unke paas koi bhi carrier nhi h ek bda nuke drop krne k liye? Bajwa sahab sutli li tarah aag lga k islamabad mein hi phod lenge xD
less means nothing when they're 100s of times bigger
They're not hundreds of times bigger today than during the period the number of weapons in each country's arsenals were higher.
The largest nuclear weapon ever deployed by the US was retired in 1976. It was more than 20 times the yield of their current largest weapon.
For Russia, their largest ever deployed warhead was retired in 1986, and it's over 12 times the yield of anything they have now.
For UK, 1970, an 11 fold yield reduction.
France, 1991, 10-12 fold decrease.
The exception among the NPT states is China, which deployed it's highest yield warhead in 1981, and hasn't yet retired it.
USSR: Hey guys- AAAAAAAAA
Russia: sup
Comment section: it's time for Africa 🌍🌍
Pakistan be like missile toh bana liya hai lekin launch kaise karu saare launchers toh made in China hain 😂😂
India be like :ab Kaise Pakistan py blame maaru unke pas Toh nukes hai ab kaise kashmiriyo py Zulum karu phir Pakistan py blame maaru Mai Toh mar gya Bachao Bhagwan
@@Pajeetkiller.2789 arre India ki army waisi nahi hai ki talibaniyo se milke khud hi apne logo ko maare...😂😂
India be like mere sab se advanced launncher brahmos khud hi ghalti se launch ho jate hain name India's one successful indigenous weapon Pakistan has many like jf 17 and al khalid and ababeel missile
@@doridropubg9825made in china hai lekin teri maa ka phuda parh sakta hai. Bas es bath ki ghamand hai muje 💪
@@donjunalare you being taught in madarsa? Pakistan can't even manufacture a needle.. Jf17/ al khalid and missile are made in China and painted in Pakistan.. Nothing more than that
Russia: I can exzemple
Everyone else is reducing their amounts of nuclear weapons but North Korea is still cranking them out like hotcakes lol
South Africa is like that one kid that entered a new school but moved to another one a year later.
Big thanks to indian for making Pakistan Nuclear country.Thanks from my heart❤️🇵🇰
And big thanks to your father China for making us Nuclear country .....🇮🇳
@@Raj-vy4qy 😂 superb bro
@@Raj-vy4qy 🤣👍 Savage reply
Pakistans nukes will fall in Indias hand when Pakistan collapses. The whole of Pakistani army will be absorbed into Indian army 😂
The whole Pakistan India rivalry seems so odd to me as an American, like you guys so similar yet hate each other so much (though I guess that’s not unique to that rivalry)
People don’t understand that it doesn’t matter how many warheads you have what matters is how powerful are the warheads and strategy on when your gonna launch it 💯💯💯💯
Thousands ???? What a crazy world
Thinking same 🤔
Think about how much it would have cost to build and keep that many warheads. Russia was just on another level. However who knows how many were actually operable.
If they're like their other arms, half to two thirds won't work anyway!!
@@no-oneinparticular7264 honestly your not that far off.
I think Russia exaggerated the number of warheads they had and it ended being really similar to what the US had during the 80s, so closer to 10-15k instead of over 30k
@@no-oneinparticular7264 Even if that is the case that's still more than enough.
@@emperorofwar1 What makes you say that? They built that many to keep up with the United States. Once they realized it wasn't neccessary they started to get rid of them. Even if what you say is true they still more than enough.
Russia's conventional military maybe a joke but their nuclear power isn't, other than America only Russia has successfully tested the most number of nuclear weapons, both atomic and hydrogen. Russian nukes work and are operational, make no mistake about thag
Free Palestine 🇵🇸
Shut up Palestine don’t have nuke
@@Leokolyaevhehehe i am from PAKISTAN and we have nuclear and we stand with PALASTINE💀🇵🇰❤🇵🇸
@@tmbrother1729no one asked😂
@@Justarandomarmenianguy i think anyone delete has commant😅🤣😂
@@tmbrother1729 UA-cam back then. Not bullying🗿
UA-cam now. Bullying 🤡
I'm a Chad and I never cry 🗿
south africa was so powerfull it didnt need nukes to win wars
India have so low nuclear weapon I want atleast 50000
@hikuscarletNot functioning LoL I think u want to taste Indian nukes 😂😂
Long Live pakistan🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰
Akhand Bharat
@@Upanishadicsaint typical street shitter
@@Upanishadicsaint Akhand Pakistan Bro Including Kashmir and Bangladesh 🇵🇰🇵🇰
@@shanahmad3974Ye life me toh possible ni he ki Bharat ko hara do bhaijaan. Ye baat tumhe v pata he,mana ki accept karna sharumnaak hogi,par ab sach he toh he. Kitni ladai dekh chuke,parinaam ek hi he.
@@shanahmad3974 na doodh denge na kheer denge , kashmir mangoge to Lahore bhi cheen lenge
Man , this is new for me
China: “we’ll just hold on to ours, you know, just in case…”
Biggest mistake of Soviet Union was to over spend on nuclear bombs
Yet Iraq was invaded for WMDs
Total:0
Russia and China aren’t going to tell how many they actually have.
Because you must did the research and counted by yourself
The Americans aren’t either
Doesn't really matter. All 3 countries have enough to start nuclear winter.
No country gives actual no.
like the americans are going to.
US&russia : We can have nuclear weapons, but you can never have them.
the dismantling might be partly from obsolence, and from higher yields. they make extra as back ups because they get targeted, but seems like you could send out your nukes before they got hit. the scariest thing for me is how clean fusion bombs are now. just another piece of artillery : (
According to abc news US and Russia each have over 5k , china with 350
Dont trust abc news
Lol, nukes were decreasing by years 🤣 😂 😅. We all know the nukes number is 10 or 20 times higher than estimated.
Of course we do....
Any PROOF, dickhead?
ua-cam.com/video/4G6e4TaJxkI/v-deo.html ! ! ! !.
@@Theineluctable_SOME_CANT Source: trust me
Because you think your lack of knowledges is better than this graphic?
You think you know that, because you’re the sad little child on the Internet who thinks it’s so exciting that armies are powerful
Im sure there were other factors at play (like icbm count) but the soviet production is incredibly impressive. Im glad that the cold war didn't turn hot
50 % in West-Germany, 50 % in East-Germany
Pakistan 🇵🇰 zindabad ❤️
Philippines a lot of nuclear bamboo type... Its a million pcs...🤪🤪🤪🤪
Don’t be fooled by the “friendly” reduction in nukes. Lots of these were old anyway and not nearly as good as modern variants 😂
*I didn't knew Pakistan got more nuclear warheads than India.*
I knew but now all they need is food 😢 not Nuclear weapons 😄
Pakistan father world he grow neclur they are educated people
30000 nuclear bombs !!!🤯🤯🤯
Russia can never lose a war
They could loose with no consequences kinda treaty if others don't want yhem to use their nuclear weapons
This is why I predict and support the reunionization of the Soviets.
Tell the Ukrainians that
Look at a russian population density chart and tell me we cant just send 2-3 nuclear warheads and kill almost everyone there
@@mrdarren1045😂
Fun fact: the yellow country which is Ukraine had nuclear weapons but USA,Russia,Uk and France said give up your nuclear weapons and you will never get a war with another country but Russia decided to declare a war against Ukraine that’s why the world with Ukraine
ukraine never had the codes to launch those weapons, they were soviet nukes stationed there
Russia is like that one kid that always acts agressive on the outside, because he's scared on the inside
Soviet union had more then 45000 nukes
Where did you get that information from? Your ass?
India be like mai kyy kru 😂😂😂
Peace cuts into piece
👍
That's catchy.
Creative
Now i see where the tax money went
Imagine shitting out 30 warheads within 30 years of existing
Putin : if you are bad, I am chad.
If you believe they actually decommissioned warheads then you are naive
You're the naive person here.
Doesn't matter, 6000 nukes is more than enough to destroy 6000 thousands major cities. Imagine that.
I was thinking the same. Real figure can be drastically different from this!
If you believe the secret intelligence services can't know how many nukes other countries have, then you are the naïve person here
it doesn't matter how many they have 1000 is more than enough to end human once and for all. The eco system after nuclear fall out would be able so sustain fragile creature like us.
One time kazakhstan also had 3000-4000 because of ussr
Nahh South Africa just wanted some peace
Pakistan: Hold my weapons
No
Hahaha
True 🦋✨♥️
🤣🖕
93000 fantastic surrended 🤣🐷
Numbers go down, powers go up!
No.
The largest nuclear weapon ever deployed by the US was retired in 1976. It was more than 20 times the yield of their current largest weapon.
For Russia, their largest ever deployed warhead was retired in 1986, and it's over 12 times the yield of anything they have now.
For UK, 1970, an 11 fold yield reduction.
France, 1991, 10-12 fold decrease.
The exception among the NPT states is China, which deployed it's highest yield warhead in 1981, and hasn't yet retired it.
Numbers go down, power goes down.
A question came WHERE RUSSIA'S 30000 BOOMS ARE GONE😢
ANS PLS
👇
Hello, they were simply redesigned and some more of the 30,000 thousand nuclear warheads became unusable and But they could be used as fuel for nuclear power plants
Iran laughing in the corner😂😂😂💀💀💀💀
I think Pakistan will cross all these countries because it has potential ..
In your dreams 😂.
Pakistan economy declined 20%
Pakistan currency is declining dude.
@@user-lf7dm3ef3h cry about it😭🥩
@@HamzaKhanMangal u cry about loss of lives in recent floods in Pak
Even though if u have potential you have no money 😂
I know you are joking. 😂👏
How many nuclear missiles are needed to ultimately destroy mankind?
5000 enough Russia or USA alone can destroy mankind. But it won't happen. Because many nukes may not explode at all or can be intercepted easily. Only a fraction of them will explode and take out billions of people
A lot. World is much bigger than people think
If not completely physically certainly politically and militarily
250
north korea thinking they all tough
Please note that south africa did have nukes. Not any more. We have bricks now
Pak won against india 😎
No
How many aircraft carriers u have🤣🤣
In return we sent brahmos to Pakistan
Namaste from India
Both of em get destroyed by nuke
@@gandhigiri9033 haw Many toilets you have😏🤣🤣🤣🤣
India and pakistan increasing it 💀
Putin : I said launch do it or you will go behind the moon
Are these stats accurate? Please mention your source.
PAK nukes❤
bhakristani 💩
You will have nuclear weapons even if you eat grass. I guess its true now. Congratulations.
@@SyedSaifAbbasNaqvi WE have Better Lifestyle Than Poor Indian With Rich Economy . go Make Toilets. Don't Spread Sh!t here Dirty Indians.
@@SyedSaifAbbasNaqvi congratulations you too
HAHAHAH
It only take one remember that
Not exactly true
@@reiss5669 What does she means?
What about Japan? Two wasn't enough
@@jsemslava7880 one isn't enough but 100+ are dangerous and remember nuclear weapons are more powerful nowadays
Not at all 😭
South africa : wait I am going in wrong video
Now show one where it illustrates who has the fuel and delivery systems to field the most warhead taking into account total payload.
Definitely gana go off a app on my phone for this