Split in Two: The Dred Scott Decision -- 1857
Вставка
- Опубліковано 9 вер 2024
- sites.mnhs.org/... Law Professor Lea Vandervelde (University of Iowa) explains the U.S. Supreme Court's 1857 decision, based in part on the Dred and Harriet Scott's time in Minnesota, and how the decision split the nation in two prior to the outbreak of war in 1861. Richard Josey (Minnesota Historical Society) focuses on the Scotts' time at Fort Snelling from 1836 to 1840.
when you see people from school in the comments lol
Cunningham?
@@pavan923 :)
up watching dred scott decision bc i have to do a 6 page essay -.- for us history
Awwww
the fact that you come to the youtubes for any accurate information on history is telling.
Trying to pass my certification as a teacher ❤
*A "NOBODY", dismissed as unworthy of rights, becomes a "SPARK" that ignites Human History towards change.*
I want to visit there as soon as possible
Here just for homework in quarrentine😐;-; 2020 April anyone?
JuNglE BoOk answers??😂
Belarus Rocky yes😭😭
me to i have to do homework :C
how about 2021?
hi fellow midzy i see your bias is chaeryeong
why would I want
to go there
what music did you use in the beginning
yeah i would like to know that too
can someone tell me wat fort snelling is so i can pass my class (im literally crying)
Here in Minnesota I can't remember where but I look it up for you come from Minnesota
Who is here because of quarantine homework 📚👉
MEEEEEEEE
m e
nice
I went there in the fifth grade on a field trip.
1:18 tey did the things that people who were officers couldn't do for themsleves LOL. Wow. Shout out to Karen for downplaying slavery so causacasiantly
Seriously, even the black guy as well!
thanks cuh
Note: the Unites states of America Congress passed Citizenship for Black People on June 13, 1866. It was ratified on July 9, 1868.
African Americans are Citizens. by the way about the Dred Scott Case the gentlemen was finally freed and he became a Politician.
I am not sure of what you are not understanding, it is not Black Citizenship.
I'm in Maryland, where Taney was from, and we have things named for Taney.
Smdh
@@emjay2045 As a teenager I lived on Taney Rd. The areas streets are named for Lawyers.
Bizarrely Taney had actually been anti slavery in his youth.
Only people who are here for online school can like this comment.
hisstory zoooom
forgot to do my homework
Slavery could only be ended through revolution and civil war. The genocide against Palestinian people can only be ended by revolution and not through voting, elections or protesting.
Hi mr parrish
Hello
At least Standing Bear got to be a person...much later.
Individual < man
how about the dissenting opinion
ez answers
dred scott was educated as a MOOR!!!
That right ach,and our people are just begin to wake up to this truth.
Shalom
what you mean? didn't he go to court and say he was a negro?
Moops.
mrfolk360 True ot of Afrikan were Moor Muslims. Salaam Akk Shalom
not the information i need
Did I ask
Did I ask
Did I ask
Did I ask
Then what, may I ask, was the information you needed?
Sad part of history. I think that Congress needs to address. Solution, blacks need to apply for naturalization. Congress needs to make special rules to allow crime standard that may not restrict because they committed a crime. For amnesty and illegals are trying to get citizenship. Is the same issue. These people are addressed in taxation laws that they pay and whites do not. Even though most do. It is clear taxation is only for fourteen amendments people. So of Mexican goes back as a citizen. IRS can and will tax them at some point. So if we have one politician with bald to address this.... Very sad day of American history. Sad, because for close to two hundred years it keeps going on
If you’re born in us soil , you ARE a US citizen. It is in the constitution
Poorly done.
typical bullshit -- not wrong exactly, but they missed the most important part.
Unless they got to this part after I quit watching, which is possible . I could not tolerate more bullshit and goofy music in the background.
What mattered was the three court orders in the decision, and how Jeff Davis cited and used those three decisions to invade and send paid killers to KS because of those court orders.
I'm not here to educate any of these "scholars" on history --but they should check would South leaders (Davis most of all) sending paid killers to KS in 1856. Those leaders boasted they used the killers to spread slavery -- for GOD -- to the Pacific. The South had a duty -- not just a right -- to spread slavery by violence ( by killing, by invasion, by torture as they proved by their actions).
But the justification -- the legal justification -- was Dred Scott three court orders.
Nothing, nothing, nothing is more important than this. South sends 2000 paid killers to KS, led by the US Senator who passed Kansas Act -- and these scholars probably don't even know that. That Kansas Act was the first part of the "machinery" as Lincoln called it, and he was right.
The second part of the machinery, machinery by South leaders to justify killing to spread slavery to the PACIFIC -- was Dred Scott decision.
Of course Lincoln explained this repeatedly -- most notable that even "scholars" should have heard of this speech by Lincoln about it -- House Divided.
So Davis cites Dred Scott (and Kansas Act) as the justification to send killers to KS, he boasts too of spreading slavery North and West, just as Lincoln said the machinery was for. Let me remind you, the machinery was Dred Scott and Kansas Act.
Dred Scott / Kansas Act. Both fathered by Jeff Davis,
The "scholars" should have, within first minute, explained that Jeff Davis cited Dred Scott as the justification for sending 2000 paid killers to KS in 1856, and used the same logic sending killers later. He used the same logic, as did South leaders generally, in their War Ultimatums of 1861.
All of it -- all all all of it, all of it, justified by Dred Scott decision court orders. So did any of these scholars find the 3 court orders? Davis did. Lincoln did. They are still there in the decision. Maybe they could take a few minutes and find them?
If Davis thought Dred Scott decision was so important he would specifically cite that as justification for the paid killers invading KS, and for the Civil War itself, maybe they should read his words explaining it? Maybe that would not be too much to ask? If they have a spare moment?
The Dred Scott decision was not -- not -- not status quo./ Whoever said that below should read it, and read the efffect of it.
I don't have time to list the three court orders, but I will check back and see if anyone was smart enough to actually read the damn decision and spot them. Maybe even smart enough to read Jeff Davis own explanation of this. Who knows? They may even have a student worker (the scholars above) who could use google to find Davis explanation and the court orders?
I don't care
Did I ask
@@Weluvurayne I did
Well you should.