I watched this movie on a 4K TV. It. Looked. Incredible. Every grain of dirt, every snowflake in stunning detail. And, since it was shot on 65mm film, it almost even looked 3D without the glasses.
This movie was completely filmed with a digital camera due to time constraints. Digital cameras can film with less light, which came in helpfull for the scenes that were taking place during dusk or dawn. They used the Arri Alexa 65 digital camera with lenses from 12mm to 21mm with little to no extra lightning. One of the best, if not thé best looking use of digital filming :)
CobraSTWK Oops, you're right. It wasn't shot on actual film, but rather digitally with the Alexa 65, which I mistook for shooting on 65mm film. Either way, it looked absolutely incredible! Thanks for the correction/ info!
lots of skeletons look Uncomfortable Human, the myth of giant cyclops in some places can be traced to ancient mammoth like skulls, with the front hole where the trunk connects appearing as a single eye socket. remaining giant bones and vertebrae also led to the idea of giants, because back then no one really knew anything about anatomy and big bones from animals they've never seen became the bones of giant humans
And yes, I'm aware that this is based off of a real story, but the actual events this was based off of took place in summer, they changed it to winter for cinematic effect, which makes no god damn sense in terms of how bears function.
"The fast-growing young ones remain alongside mom, while nursing and resting themselves. Though the mother bears are usually asleep, they wake up occasionally to manage the needs of their cubs."
+Cody Dudash (DatManYdocris) bears don't sleep all winter they are still active animals. the weird part about it is the fact the young bears were well so young I would expect them to be a bit older then cubs by winter
@@sicka5255 yeah, but Glass tracking Fitzgerald all the way to an army camp and confronting him there would have made a much more dramatic and sad ending. Also giving him a native son is useless, being left behind and taking his rifle would have been enough to fuel glass's thirst for revenge
Had nothing to do with its length. I regularly watch long films. The film was just boring. The technical qualities of the film were highly impressive, so too the acting, but it was a boring film. Films don't need action or fast scenes to be good. 12 Angry Men, for example, is a fantastic film and I thoroughly enjoyed it. The extended addition of the Lord of the Rings is quite long but thoroughly enjoyable. This film lacked something.
I think the real story was equally cool, might be more unbelievable than the movie considering how much skin he was missing during so much of it. I don't think they needed to add a son to make him seem more likable cause the dude was just such a badass I'm sure people would be enthralled no matter how motivated by rage he was.
The real Hugh Glass most likely survived his horrible flesh wounds without dying of infection and septic shock because his wounds became infested with maggots, which are known to prevent infection. At least that's what I read about the real Hugh Glass.
The reason Glass brings his son along is because they didn't have daycare back then. And then there's the whole death of his woman thing that makes him feel responsible more than most fathers would. Glass survives the bear rolling on him because the bear mostly rolls on his lower body and its legs land right in front of Glass, which shows that the bear didn't just roll all of its weight on top of Glass, but in a kind of awkward way it steps over him. By step, I mean that the bear's own legs are under its body, placed just in front of Glass. So most of the bear's weight ends up on his legs as it kind of flips over Glass more than rolls on him. Glass is on a cliff and is high above the water. You sin the film for not showing how he got down there. Well, if they showed that, we'd have another half hour to add to the length you already complained about, which means your sin is a _damned if you do, damned if you don't_ point. The Indians can't hit Glass in the water because he's moving a lot faster than the guys who were just standing around. The wolves didn't finish the bear's job because North American wolves don't tend to attack humans. And again, the Indians can't hit Glass on horseback because he's a moving target. But someone does hit the horse. Thank God this horse died? After running off a cliff? Back then, a canteen laying around wouldn't be left on the ground. Unlike today's world, back then people didn't have much and what little they did have wasn't cheap to come by.
***** "Then how were they able to hit guys who were running around with little difficulty?" -A raging river carries people a lot faster than people can run AND Glass was partially and sometimes fully underwater. "They will when that human is injured and they are in a feeding frenzy." -There is no documented evidence of a healthy North American wolf attacking a human except in cases of mistaken identity, as in people in sleeping bags filled with wool. "Yet, Glass was able to hit Indians who were also riding on horseback.....with a short barreled pistol!" -Yes, because firing a pistol on horseback is a hell of a lot easier than using both hands to pull arms' length bowstring. "Glass survived after falling off the same cliff, but we're just splitting hairs, aren't we?" -Watch the clip again. Glass' fall was broken by the tree branches. There is no way a horse can enjoy the same chances.
EDIT Three fatal attacks on humans in North America. Your feeding frenzy on an injured human, however, is baseless. Anyway, I wrote "The wolves didn't finish the bear's job because North American wolves *don't tend to attack* humans." And indeed, the list of wolf attacks on humans is sparse. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wolf_attacks_in_North_America
***** "do you think there were accurate records of frontier men being attacked/killed by wolves back in the 1800's?" -There don't need to be any records. The attacks tend to happen when wolves become habituated to humans. "Remember, there were a lot more wolves in the wild back then" -Yes, and there were a lot fewer humans in the entire continent back then. The Indian population was sparse even then. Half a million square miles of the Plains provided for an estimated 75,000 Native Americans. 9.6 million people altogether, but most on the east side of the Mississippi. Almost no population west, where this story takes place, in North Dakota. Fewer than 2 people per square mile. "and they encountered a lot more humans encroaching on their hunting grounds." -Not really. "Hitting a moving target in the water is no different than one on land." -No. "If the Indians are able to hunt bison, which can reach a top speed of 40 mph," -No, they did not shoot the bison while they were running. They ran their prey down until they were expired, _then_ fired at them preferably within 5 yards. The human animal can't outrun most land animals, but we're built for a distance around 27 miles. Bison can outrun humans easily, but the Indians tracked them and ran them off until the prey were out of energy. They had to do this because one arrow isn't going to guarantee a trophy, but it would definitely guarantee a charging tank, and an injured bison even 30 feet away is extremely dangerous. The natives perfected their art of running down their prey. "hitting a moving target while on horseback. That's how they hunted." -No. Again, they ran down their prey first. "but he should have been torn up as he ripped through them." -Perhaps, but I find it completely feasible that many branches bending under him could slow his fall. I don't expect those pine branches a few feet from the tree to be equivalent to a baseball bat beating on his body.
***** That could've been explained better in the movie. Sure. My impression was that he only killed when he felt he had to. Consider that he could've killed the boy who left with him, but spared him and assumed he wouldn't give him away at the fort. But I'm just speculating.
***** I think it really has to do with porting the story to the big screen. Fitzgerald was a good enough man while Glass was, well, a hard ass. If they changed much more, then the movie would be way too far from the story it's based on. It's bad enough they switched protagonist with antagonist.
Also THE BIGGEST SIN OF ALL: in the scene where Glass drinks at the river there is water coming out from his neck because of the bear's scratch, that lesioned his trachea leaving him aphonic. For the water to flow out of his neck he should have had his esophagus lesioned, but it is impossible because it runs BEHIND the trachea so, in order to reach the structure, the bear should have cut his trachea in half (killing him without question).. So, in fewer words: it is anatomically impossible that water comes out from that neck scratch! ;)
+klo45pl the only sins would be 1. the movie didnt last for ever so we could enjoy it for all eternity 2. it didnt get the 100 Oscars they deserve 3. the movie is too awesome too sin, which pisses Cinemasins off
Not if it was a longrifle. Those things had an effective range of up to 100 yards in the hands of an average user, or 250 yards if you were an experienced shooter like Daniel Boone that knew how to compensate.
It isn't. They missed quite a few. For example the ending scene with Leo staring inside the camera and breathing hard for 5 solid minutes. Pretty disturbing. Also the "background music" for the movie's credit was him breathing.
@@thenavigator2559 no it makes it his opinion as he has said and this is his video so If you don't want to hear his asshole opinions don't watch his video.
I thought about this too. It's a good point but I think their thinking was... there is NO way Tom Hardy would be stupid enough to kill Leo without the others witnessing that he wanted to be euthanized.... but Tom Hardy WAS stupid enough to do that.
Wow, people are being really rude to you for no reason, that's the internet for you. I really enjoyed Leo in The Revenant, but I think he did a better acting job in The Departed and The Aviator, he deserved an Oscar for one of those. But at least he finally got one, and I doubt it will be his last one.
OK.. maybe even add one sin for the scene at 02:21 - 02:23 of your sins video where the bird crawls out... and the actress playing dead.. opens her eyes... Keep up the great work! Peace!
I love the fact that over 85% of the film is filmed within less than 100km(or 62miles for the metrically impaired, but this was filmed in Canada) of my house in Canmore Alberta and I have been to pretty much each location quite literally a hundred times. Some of them are within walking distance. Also getting to meet Leonardo DeCaprio :and Tom Hardy :)
Need to remove the sin for the crows being there so soon. It's well known they would follow groups of men into battle knowing there would be plenty of corpses to eat.
The main thing that bothered me about this movie was the fact that it could have been so much better. It was beautifully shot indeed. I wonder if anyone else had the same problem as me, because I didn't care about the main character one bit. I didn't find him interesting or appealing enough to give a damn what happens to him.
I share that. It was bog standard revenge story and the son was solely used for a plot device and wasn't an actual character so there was no emotional investment in any characters for me. Crawling around and grunting doesn't make for good character development.
Indeed. There was no character development for the main character. They tried to give him a bit of development in the end (when he doesn't kill Fitz), but it's not only completely out of left field (it wasn't emotionally earned), but it's also bullshit, because the Indians just kill Fitz. It was a revenge flick without action, and a drama without emotion.
I also am not a fan of this movie but I never thought of that what you said and yes you are right. Now if I ever talk about this movie again with someone who loved it I will say use that. There is no investment in the main character and therefore you dont really care about him.
Yeah it was like, oh here's this guy. He's in this situation. You should totally care because you know NOTHING about him or what he's like. Because main character, that's why.
My biggest issue was the insertion of unnecessary child. Also irl Hugh Glass was a big enough man to not ultimately get revenge at any cost that's pretty impressive.
I thought the "sticking tongue out during the snow" was cute And lol every time you say "Pawnee" I keep thinking of Parks and Rec. I mean no disrespect to any Native Americans, It just won't leave my head
Saw this movie yesterday. I get why they got the oscar for best cinematography etc but it does drag down the movie a bit, in the opening and during the survival parts it made sense to get the feeling they are in the middle of nowhere, but too much is too much. Also, I liked how Leo breaks the 4th wall at the end, yes he does look straight into the camera, that felt creepy.
idk man I was super excited to watch this movie. i watched it the other day and out of all the great movies Leo has been in i really don't think he should of gotten the Oscar for this one
He probably got the Oscar because he actually ate raw flesh, even though he was vegan. Not giving an Oscar to an actor with that much dedication would be a crime.
You could've sinned the obvious CGI herd of bufallo-somethings. Like "Obvious CGI herd of bufallo-somethings makes me question the reality of any previous practical scenes, thus negating the purpose of their practicality".
I wonder if this guy can ever watch a movie without picking it apart. Personally its so hard to find a truly good movie that I don't want to train my mind to pick out every last little thing wrong.
I have a similar tendency to nitpick, but I can mostly turn it off during my first viewing of a movie. After that, I overanalyze virtually every scene.
Picking things apart is kind of the point of his channel. What I'm wondering is why anyone watches his channel knowing what he does, then complains about it when he does exactly what he promises to deliver.
tara shaw. Well you need more training, i don't know why but I've done this for as long as i can remember. Doesn't sit well with my woman, family or friends though. I'm sure that comes as a surprise. Lol
Did anyone else not love this movie? I really can't pin down what I didn't like about it, but I just didn't. Just so many nature shots, which look amazing, but there are so many. The action was awesome though.
I didn't like it. Bog standard revenge story, with the "I'm better than you so i won't finish you off myself" cliché. The son wasn't a character just a plot device. It was an hour longer than it needed to be and just bored the hell out of me.
It was really, really boring. It was half an hour of story stretched into two and a half hour. All characters except for the villain were one-dimensional for the whole movie.
+karlzone2 to much tree to much crawling and grunting and well ... yes. He is still breathing. can we go on now?! the First scene is around 2 fucking minutes River, until they step in.
I rather watch a nature documentary (which I love) then this movie again. Something with David Attenborough for example. This movie was beauiful shot no doubt and under hard conditions but the acting was just spitting and yelling where is my Boyuuh! Leo shouldnt deserve oscar for this, problem with Leo is he always had one oscar nominee who was just better then him that year
Honestly I don't understand how one can love this movie so much either. It was like 60 minutes of movie stretched out into two and a half hours. I mean... sure the cinematography is pretty, but that's like all its got going for it. Every character except Fitzgerald is completely one dimensional too.
common man you sinned the movie for how realistic the bear fight was AND sinned it cause he ate the meat raw when he was starving???? those were undeserved
Even the film make admitted to some mistakes, like Judy being a hare, not a bunny( they said they did this so not to confuse little kids) or the tranquilizer gun from the trailers wasn't in the movie.
it was a pretty good film. however there wasn't much acting in it. compare the acting in wolf of Wallstreet to this. i mean very different styles but the acting cred goes to wolf, i dont like the story but the acting is way better.
That is what makes it amazing! To express emotion through words is easier for actors. Leo expressed all emotion through actions. He 100% deserved his oscar.
The movie was hugely boring and didn't show a whole lot of anything, not even dialogue for 2.5 hours... that should automatically add 100 sins. What can you nitpick with 2.5 hours of silence and cinematography?
the river scene where he was "swimming". The reason he wouldn’t get hit in the river is because of Newton’s first law of motion. An object in motion stays in motion, until acted apon by an outside force. The water stopped the arrows from hitting him.
This film was really amazing, quite unique. But not without sin.
Hey man! I love your channel!
overrated
This film was garbage.
no movie is without sin!
I agree how many realy liked this movie
I watched this movie on a 4K TV. It. Looked. Incredible. Every grain of dirt, every snowflake in stunning detail. And, since it was shot on 65mm film, it almost even looked 3D without the glasses.
Wow I need to do this as well
All of it was shot on 65mm? Wow
This movie was completely filmed with a digital camera due to time constraints. Digital cameras can film with less light, which came in helpfull for the scenes that were taking place during dusk or dawn. They used the Arri Alexa 65 digital camera with lenses from 12mm to 21mm with little to no extra lightning. One of the best, if not thé best looking use of digital filming :)
You're a fucking idiot
CobraSTWK Oops, you're right. It wasn't shot on actual film, but rather digitally with the Alexa 65, which I mistook for shooting on 65mm film. Either way, it looked absolutely incredible! Thanks for the correction/ info!
Glass is traveling with the current, he's not swimming. Cmon man
And he never did swim as well as Phelps even healthy.
no shit thank you man
Thankyou.
That avalanche happened live while they were filming so they added it into the movie bc it happened at such the perfect time
They caused it with explosives
And it was a one and done thing. So they had to get it right
Your mom showing up in my room happened at the perfect time.
Cool fact 😎
Who brings his kid to a deadly job?? Almost everybody in the 1800´s. Specially a frontiersman who lives in the wilderness.
Kwijiboz his kid had nowhere to go
I know I'm a year late, but am I the only one that was kind of reminded of Kratos and his son from God of War by this?
Kwijiboz almost as if that’s what the main purpose of having children back then was lol
Most men would just leave their families with hopes of striking it rich and returning.
Kwijiboz Yeah better leave his native son with all those white guys.
That "zombie" of yours is actually the bear. Bears look like humans when skinned
hUh
Really?
@@nicolascage5323 I'll uh, pass
@@justmart4455 just in case you need it, i confirm
lots of skeletons look Uncomfortable Human, the myth of giant cyclops in some places can be traced to ancient mammoth like skulls, with the front hole where the trunk connects appearing as a single eye socket. remaining giant bones and vertebrae also led to the idea of giants, because back then no one really knew anything about anatomy and big bones from animals they've never seen became the bones of giant humans
Let's not forget that Hugh got mauled by a bear... in Winter... you know, that time of year when all bears are hibernating.
And yes, I'm aware that this is based off of a real story, but the actual events this was based off of took place in summer, they changed it to winter for cinematic effect, which makes no god damn sense in terms of how bears function.
"The fast-growing young ones remain alongside mom, while nursing and resting themselves. Though the mother bears are usually asleep, they wake up occasionally to manage the needs of their cubs."
Considering it was with her cubs, there are plenty of reasons to be out
+Cody Dudash (DatManYdocris) bears don't sleep all winter they are still active animals. the weird part about it is the fact the young bears were well so young I would expect them to be a bit older then cubs by winter
False, not all bears hibernate the way you think. Most in fact do move out to have snacks during the winter.
Hugh Glass wasn't only driven by anger, but because Fitzgerald stole his prized rifle.
Only for the government to tell him no you shall not have your vengeance
@@mrnukes797 yeah but he was allowed his rifle back and got 300 which would of been a lot back then
The dopple?
It sounds like John Wick routine
Breaking news: American frontiersman too pissed to die, crawls hundreds of miles on deaths door just to get revenge
There should've been sins or sin removals during the fight between Glass and Fitzgerald at the end, really intense scene, great movie by the way
Ikr? He removes sins for the other action sequences yet he leaves out the better out of all
because it didn't happen. Glass never killed Fitzgerald in real life
@@Fizzy167 yeah wasn't he in the army and the told glass he couldn't kill him?
@@Fizzy167 it was based on a real story. Maybe they just added that because of cinematic purposes?
@@sicka5255 yeah, but Glass tracking Fitzgerald all the way to an army camp and confronting him there would have made a much more dramatic and sad ending. Also giving him a native son is useless, being left behind and taking his rifle would have been enough to fuel glass's thirst for revenge
Insert Leonardo DiCaprio Oscar joke here.
Insert Donald Trump joke here.
Well the joke isn't valid anymore lol. He got an Oscar for this movie.
+Benji Cooke not for this movie no
Insert Bear Grylls joke here
Insert epic Minecraft let's play xD here
Vultures circle the old folks home where I live.
That's some hardcore shit right there...
how they doing
Not sure why anyone thinks these are vultures in that part of the world
there are vultures in america
Javier Burgos Mostly in DC.
0:55 - Yeah, I'm sure all that meat and pelts they hunted for had nothing to do with the vultures circling overhead.
For being nitpicky, he sure does miss details.
@@russianfeline1286 And fucking contradict himself
Shortest sins video in a while just shows how good this movie was
Unfortunately this film was utterly boring.
I saw it in the theater. Watching it at home, I can see that
I saw it in the theater, and I would have left if not for my friends sleeping beside me.
+Grant Mitchell I smell a short attention span
Had nothing to do with its length. I regularly watch long films. The film was just boring. The technical qualities of the film were highly impressive, so too the acting, but it was a boring film.
Films don't need action or fast scenes to be good. 12 Angry Men, for example, is a fantastic film and I thoroughly enjoyed it. The extended addition of the Lord of the Rings is quite long but thoroughly enjoyable.
This film lacked something.
I guess I can call this...
*put sunglasses on*
a Treesome...
*YEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAHHHH*
You must be commended XD
carlos!!!
Bah dum chhh
I hope you don't intend on branching out into comedy
ɷɷ I Havee Watchedddd This Movieee Leakedddd Versionnn Hereee : - t.co/SaFQ6vaRSb
I was upset that you didn't notice Leo shooting a flintlock pistol several times in succession without stopping to reload
When? Lol
+Matt Simmons the scene where the french guy rapes that girl and right before they chase his horse off the cliff
always thought that he reloaded it off camera or something. Still something that was pretty noticeable.
+Andrew Pedison he has two pistols in that scene
+Matt Simmons he shot 3 or 4 times at least
I think the real story was equally cool, might be more unbelievable than the movie considering how much skin he was missing during so much of it. I don't think they needed to add a son to make him seem more likable cause the dude was just such a badass I'm sure people would be enthralled no matter how motivated by rage he was.
The real Hugh Glass most likely survived his horrible flesh wounds without dying of infection and septic shock because his wounds became infested with maggots, which are known to prevent infection. At least that's what I read about the real Hugh Glass.
The reason Glass brings his son along is because they didn't have daycare back then. And then there's the whole death of his woman thing that makes him feel responsible more than most fathers would.
Glass survives the bear rolling on him because the bear mostly rolls on his lower body and its legs land right in front of Glass, which shows that the bear didn't just roll all of its weight on top of Glass, but in a kind of awkward way it steps over him. By step, I mean that the bear's own legs are under its body, placed just in front of Glass. So most of the bear's weight ends up on his legs as it kind of flips over Glass more than rolls on him.
Glass is on a cliff and is high above the water. You sin the film for not showing how he got down there. Well, if they showed that, we'd have another half hour to add to the length you already complained about, which means your sin is a _damned if you do, damned if you don't_ point.
The Indians can't hit Glass in the water because he's moving a lot faster than the guys who were just standing around.
The wolves didn't finish the bear's job because North American wolves don't tend to attack humans.
And again, the Indians can't hit Glass on horseback because he's a moving target. But someone does hit the horse.
Thank God this horse died? After running off a cliff?
Back then, a canteen laying around wouldn't be left on the ground. Unlike today's world, back then people didn't have much and what little they did have wasn't cheap to come by.
*****
"Then how were they able to hit guys who were running around with little difficulty?"
-A raging river carries people a lot faster than people can run AND Glass was partially and sometimes fully underwater.
"They will when that human is injured and they are in a feeding frenzy."
-There is no documented evidence of a healthy North American wolf attacking a human except in cases of mistaken identity, as in people in sleeping bags filled with wool.
"Yet, Glass was able to hit Indians who were also riding on horseback.....with a short barreled pistol!"
-Yes, because firing a pistol on horseback is a hell of a lot easier than using both hands to pull arms' length bowstring.
"Glass survived after falling off the same cliff, but we're just splitting hairs, aren't we?"
-Watch the clip again. Glass' fall was broken by the tree branches. There is no way a horse can enjoy the same chances.
EDIT
Three fatal attacks on humans in North America. Your feeding frenzy on an injured human, however, is baseless.
Anyway, I wrote "The wolves didn't finish the bear's job because North American wolves *don't tend to attack* humans." And indeed, the list of wolf attacks on humans is sparse.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wolf_attacks_in_North_America
*****
"do you think there were accurate records of frontier men being attacked/killed by wolves back in the 1800's?"
-There don't need to be any records. The attacks tend to happen when wolves become habituated to humans.
"Remember, there were a lot more wolves in the wild back then"
-Yes, and there were a lot fewer humans in the entire continent back then. The Indian population was sparse even then. Half a million square miles of the Plains provided for an estimated 75,000 Native Americans. 9.6 million people altogether, but most on the east side of the Mississippi. Almost no population west, where this story takes place, in North Dakota. Fewer than 2 people per square mile.
"and they encountered a lot more humans encroaching on their hunting grounds."
-Not really.
"Hitting a moving target in the water is no different than one on land."
-No.
"If the Indians are able to hunt bison, which can reach a top speed of 40 mph,"
-No, they did not shoot the bison while they were running. They ran their prey down until they were expired, _then_ fired at them preferably within 5 yards. The human animal can't outrun most land animals, but we're built for a distance around 27 miles. Bison can outrun humans easily, but the Indians tracked them and ran them off until the prey were out of energy. They had to do this because one arrow isn't going to guarantee a trophy, but it would definitely guarantee a charging tank, and an injured bison even 30 feet away is extremely dangerous. The natives perfected their art of running down their prey.
"hitting a moving target while on horseback. That's how they hunted."
-No. Again, they ran down their prey first.
"but he should have been torn up as he ripped through them."
-Perhaps, but I find it completely feasible that many branches bending under him could slow his fall. I don't expect those pine branches a few feet from the tree to be equivalent to a baseball bat beating on his body.
*****
That could've been explained better in the movie. Sure. My impression was that he only killed when he felt he had to. Consider that he could've killed the boy who left with him, but spared him and assumed he wouldn't give him away at the fort. But I'm just speculating.
*****
I think it really has to do with porting the story to the big screen. Fitzgerald was a good enough man while Glass was, well, a hard ass. If they changed much more, then the movie would be way too far from the story it's based on. It's bad enough they switched protagonist with antagonist.
I know the bear attack scene is what everyone remembers, but that opening Indian attack scene is so beautiful shot
Best part of the movie IMO
Zootopia, Deadpool, and Batman v Superman are waiting patiently, CinemaSins. Don't make them wait any longer.
BvS isn't even on dvd yet
+MegaSoulhero Even if it was they couldn't fit all the sins into one video. They would get flagged for copyright for posting the whole movie.
+Matthew Murdock They've done movies that are worse than Batman v Superman
also angry birds and jungle book can't wait for those
Yeah, I hear them screaming at ya.
I love how in the real story the man he is trying to kill joins the army so he can't get revenge lol.
right...at that point just let him do it...he cheated death for fuck sakes
Maybe he realized it's not worth it
@@lagatita1623 If someone did all that shit to me I'd do the same, and definitely would be worth it
Also THE BIGGEST SIN OF ALL: in the scene where Glass drinks at the river there is water coming out from his neck because of the bear's scratch, that lesioned his trachea leaving him aphonic. For the water to flow out of his neck he should have had his esophagus lesioned, but it is impossible because it runs BEHIND the trachea so, in order to reach the structure, the bear should have cut his trachea in half (killing him without question)..
So, in fewer words: it is anatomically impossible that water comes out from that neck scratch! ;)
Haha nice
so what nigga. just enjoy a movie for once you nerds
Yes but is it possible to cauterise a scratch in your neck with gunpowder?
Hobbyist Contrarian
It's just fire. Glorified cauterizing.
Giorgio Caddia so . . You are an MD, thank you Dr.Dumbass !
-5 sins because Leonardo DiCaprio ended the age old meme.
That would be a sin in my book
what
This is the movie that finally ended the "Leonardo DeCaprio cannot get an Oscar meme"
I want to sniff your computer chair
Deadpool Deadpool Deadpool #GO
They already did it... You fucking melon
No they didn't "you fucking melon". CinimaWins did it, but not CinimaSins
No they haven't. Maybe someone else has, there's lots of videos with similar names these days but they CinemaSins haven't done Deadpool yet.
+Lachlan's Biggest Fan Before you insult someone, get your facts right. Screen Junkies did it, not Cinemasins.
+Lachlan's Biggest Fan Ha you're the fucking melon
When he's cutting and removing the guts from that dead horse, he sure has a lot of strength for a guy that just fell off a cliff
adrenaline i suppose
Why should he take his pants off and then start cutting off the liver? 🤷♂️
If he suffered no major injuries what does falling have to do with strength and ability to gut a horse for warmth
You sound slow would you find strength or would you freeze the true story is even more unbelievable than the movie guy
Emmanuel Lubezki could film a pile of dog shit and it'd be gorgeous
lol
have you seen his instagram account. That man is a genius
damn straight
.
+FireWorkZZZZZ it was actually a compliment
Do saving private ryan next. Can't believe you haven't done that movie yet!
That movie is too perfect
He doesn't sin movies like that.
ItsEganTime Why wouldn't he?
Steven Van Zuijlen He doesn't sin emotional or very serious movies.
+ItsEganTime yeah he does...
This is one of the shortest EWW videos I've seen in a while!
yes that's strange when you compare to his other vids!
this was kinda their standard back in the day.
+Pazzo MC but before the long ones he used to speak like some mad man was holding a gun to his head.
y is it called eww?
ps im new
The actual story is more interesting, shorter, and much more believable. But this movie was shot extremely beautifully.
DO THE SHAWSHANK REDEMPTION! Pls
Agree!
+Letnemip & Stuff no movie is without sin
this!
that would be a rly short video tho
+klo45pl the only sins would be
1. the movie didnt last for ever so we could enjoy it for all eternity
2. it didnt get the 100 Oscars they deserve
3. the movie is too awesome too sin, which pisses Cinemasins off
CS: “Who brings their kid to a deadly job?”
Batman: *sweats profusely*
You left out the part where the antagonist shot a man off a horse from 100 yards away with an inaccurate rifle from the 1820s
The movie seemed to gloss over the ineffectiveness of rifles back then
They also ignored how inaccurate bows that the tribes were using are
+Dawson Chavez Please explain how they are inaccurate.
Not if it was a longrifle. Those things had an effective range of up to 100 yards in the hands of an average user, or 250 yards if you were an experienced shooter like Daniel Boone that knew how to compensate.
It's a movie, NOT a History Channel Documentary.
He did have a pawnee son, he also was forced yo be a pirate, had maggots in his back, and was in many battles with Indians. But never got revenge
Be honest, many of these aren't even sins.
yea, its almost like they make these videos to entertain, and not be completely serious critiques at all times lol. Welcome to Cinema Sins :)
Danny Malzahn exactly.
this movie deserved way more sins
"We're not critics were assholes" - CinemaSins.
Ok tell us, tell us some more sins
Looks like Cinema Sins is grasping at straws in an effort to find things wrong with this movie. It must be really good.
It was fantastic
Not really. They mentionned on their podcast sometimes it's because a movie is just too boring and empty of content to find many sins
What are you talking about? Jeremy loved the movie on his review of it.
Phenomenal movie. Sorry I only saw it twice on the big screen.
It isn't. They missed quite a few. For example the ending scene with Leo staring inside the camera and breathing hard for 5 solid minutes. Pretty disturbing. Also the "background music" for the movie's credit was him breathing.
How can you criticize the fact that they showed Glass cauterizing his wound? This is an R rated movie, so... What exactly was your problem?
He was being nitpicky douche. He was grossed by Leo eviscerating the horse to stay warm.
You idiots don't seem to realize he isn't a critic, he is an asshole as stated by him many a time
@@RED-hb1di "he said he's a asshole, do that's makes it better." No..it doesn't
@@RED-hb1di why r u following him really :D
@@thenavigator2559 no it makes it his opinion as he has said and this is his video so If you don't want to hear his asshole opinions don't watch his video.
“Actual footage of Leonardo DiCaprio‘s birth” lmao
You forgot to mention the stunning Soundtrack for this movie "Sound of hugh glass"
Holy shit I was waiting for this!
yay so I wasnt the only one😉😂
Now that it's here, what's the next thing to wait for? o_O
+M. Strain Jr. SHREEEKKK
Likewise. I hope they do the Fifth Wave because the Fifth Wave was ass.
Likewise. I hope they do the Fifth Wave because the Fifth Wave was ass.
my girlfriend asked, "why did they leave him with the guy who wants to kill him?" - I thought, she would be great at CinemaSins
Lol
I thought about this too. It's a good point but I think their thinking was... there is NO way Tom Hardy would be stupid enough to kill Leo without the others witnessing that he wanted to be euthanized.... but Tom Hardy WAS stupid enough to do that.
imo the bear scene is one of the best scenes in recent movies and doesnt deserve a sin
Please do "Everything wrong with: Sharknado"
it makes sense in this scene. Sin it.
+SpiceTrade Magnate what?! :D
n.stoeterau
chainsaws, man.
SpiceTrade Magnate
:D
It may be the first movie to not have ONE sin...
still don't understand how this was the movie that Leo got his award for
No, just no.
You are an idiot.
***** Right? People are ridiculous.
Wow, people are being really rude to you for no reason, that's the internet for you.
I really enjoyed Leo in The Revenant, but I think he did a better acting job in The Departed and The Aviator, he deserved an Oscar for one of those. But at least he finally got one, and I doubt it will be his last one.
Bendrix27 They usually are, but being called an idiot is a nice reprieve from getting called a terrorist.
For some reason, "The Revenant" reminds me a bit of "The Elders Scrolls V: Skyrim", they are both so gritty and bloody.
-Him being named Glass when he's made of iron.
2.5 hours and less than 100 sins... amazing
well nothing much happened in most of the movie so difficult to find sins in it, huh?
Well it was a pretty simple history ...
30 minutes of plot and more than 90 sins is not all that impressive honestly.
Watch the older cinema sins videos, by your logic all the movies he sinned them are amazing
+Captain Pony perhaps the most amazing should be king kong. three hours and just sixty sins
where the hell is everything wrong with Deadpool
They're trying to get Ryan Reynolds involved with that video, I think.
Ok
Also I just notice that my profile pic fits perfectly with that comment
+Insane Mushroom that would be the weirdest thing
+Insane Mushroom pretty much every single deadpool review has featured "Deadpool" himself
Everything Wrong with Zootopia!! Plss
I saw the honest trailer for Zootopia and was surprised CinemaSins haven't done it yet. They often pick same films to criticise :D
This... this drunk robot seems familiar.
My brother and I tore that movie to shreds.
Too many sins to count.
Honestly trying to fit all the issues that the movie presents into one video would be longer than the movie
That wasn’t a job. Those young kids had no Choice at that time. A lot of survival back then
OK.. maybe even add one sin for the scene at 02:21 - 02:23 of your sins video where the bird crawls out... and the actress playing dead.. opens her eyes...
Keep up the great work!
Peace!
Can't unsee.
amazing catch!!
But maybe remove a Sin at 2:07 because it's not a Zombie but a bear without skin.
Obviously they know that. The zombie thing was a joke dumbass
Holy shit, good eye.
Please do everything wrong with Zootopia
It'll probably be up in a month or two
+Michael Joseph it's gonna be so long
Automatic 1.5 million sins removed for the DMV scene.
I love the fact that over 85% of the film is filmed within less than 100km(or 62miles for the metrically impaired, but this was filmed in Canada) of my house in Canmore Alberta and I have been to pretty much each location quite literally a hundred times. Some of them are within walking distance. Also getting to meet Leonardo DeCaprio :and Tom Hardy :)
Need to remove the sin for the crows being there so soon. It's well known they would follow groups of men into battle knowing there would be plenty of corpses to eat.
Only half of these are sins... well, never mind :)
Trur
We were watching this in my summer class today and then I come home and see that they uploaded a EWW of it.
Coincedence?
I
THINK
NOT!
illuminati confirmed
... so what are you implying?
+Tdragonkid illuminati fam
Of course, around here, we always sin coincidences.
Ding!
That's racist.
Ding!
The main thing that bothered me about this movie was the fact that it could have been so much better. It was beautifully shot indeed. I wonder if anyone else had the same problem as me, because I didn't care about the main character one bit. I didn't find him interesting or appealing enough to give a damn what happens to him.
I share that.
It was bog standard revenge story and the son was solely used for a plot device and wasn't an actual character so there was no emotional investment in any characters for me.
Crawling around and grunting doesn't make for good character development.
Indeed. There was no character development for the main character. They tried to give him a bit of development in the end (when he doesn't kill Fitz), but it's not only completely out of left field (it wasn't emotionally earned), but it's also bullshit, because the Indians just kill Fitz. It was a revenge flick without action, and a drama without emotion.
I also am not a fan of this movie but I never thought of that what you said and yes you are right. Now if I ever talk about this movie again with someone who loved it I will say use that. There is no investment in the main character and therefore you dont really care about him.
Yeah it was like, oh here's this guy. He's in this situation. You should totally care because you know NOTHING about him or what he's like. Because main character, that's why.
YES THANK YOU!
My biggest issue was the insertion of unnecessary child. Also irl Hugh Glass was a big enough man to not ultimately get revenge at any cost that's pretty impressive.
This movie was a two-hour long footage of Leo crawling towards an Oscar.
A 2 and a half hour movie only gets 73 sins + a bonus round?
This is a Man In The Wilderness (1971) ripoff, plus half of the movie is cinematography.
+Steve Rogers You're kidding, right?
TheJrbdog Google it.
Steve Rogers I know what movie you are talking about. Calling it a ripoff is like calling Captain America (2011) a ripoff of Captain America (1990).
TheJrbdog You're saying that Revenat isn't a ripoff ?
I thought the "sticking tongue out during the snow" was cute
And lol every time you say "Pawnee" I keep thinking of Parks and Rec. I mean no disrespect to any Native Americans, It just won't leave my head
Apples4Applez thought I was the only one that was like wait “ Pawnee “ is real
White Working Class Pride be quiet
that comment is inherently racist. just as are the other replies
Imagine disrespecting a such God Tier movie.
CinemaSins are not disrespecting the movies they make videos of. Fuck off, Cyrus
He literally compliments the movie several times and states he is being a nitpicky piece of shit twice!
This movie sucked.
@@michaelnice93 you have shit taste
Saw this movie yesterday. I get why they got the oscar for best cinematography etc but it does drag down the movie a bit, in the opening and during the survival parts it made sense to get the feeling they are in the middle of nowhere, but too much is too much. Also, I liked how Leo breaks the 4th wall at the end, yes he does look straight into the camera, that felt creepy.
*complains about not seeing him slowly walk/crawl to river to drink *complains about seeing him do something he has to do
Love this channel tho tbh
1:43 Grizzly Man reference was just perfect!
"You hear that, Ed? Bears! Now, you're putting the whole station in jeopardy"
idk man I was super excited to watch this movie. i watched it the other day and out of all the great movies Leo has been in i really don't think he should of gotten the Oscar for this one
Agreed, plus this is a Man In The Wilderness (1971) ripoff. Fuck Hollywood for giving an oscar to this movie.
He probably got the Oscar because he actually ate raw flesh, even though he was vegan. Not giving an Oscar to an actor with that much dedication would be a crime.
They didn't even give him a damn Oscar in the fucking Titanic....
Yet the crew of Jackass the movie didn't get any.
+Steve Rogers and who are you? Ripoff or not you couldn't just have enjoyed the movie? People. Are. So. Fucking. Critical. These. Days.
You could've sinned the obvious CGI herd of bufallo-somethings. Like "Obvious CGI herd of bufallo-somethings makes me question the reality of any previous practical scenes, thus negating the purpose of their practicality".
sounds properly worded.
Hehe!
Well they would've used real Bison. But you know, almost hunted to extinction
_...Then do another scene with something else!_
"For audience, good movie/bad movie, is all that matters" - Jackie Chan.
Alternatively: "No obviously CGI bison were harmed in the making of this scene."
+100 sins for "he should have died" -100 sins for "beautiful graphics" THE END
The good does not wash out the bad, nor the bad the good.
This happened to a real guy uk that right?
Watched this movie on acid and I swear I thought I was in this movie. Also the scenes of the land and sky were so beautiful it brought me to tears
Fuck you make me want to do it
Lol
I wonder if this guy can ever watch a movie without picking it apart. Personally its so hard to find a truly good movie that I don't want to train my mind to pick out every last little thing wrong.
I have a similar tendency to nitpick, but I can mostly turn it off during my first viewing of a movie. After that, I overanalyze virtually every scene.
Picking things apart is kind of the point of his channel. What I'm wondering is why anyone watches his channel knowing what he does, then complains about it when he does exactly what he promises to deliver.
tara shaw. Well you need more training, i don't know why but I've done this for as long as i can remember. Doesn't sit well with my woman, family or friends though. I'm sure that comes as a surprise. Lol
I can just imagine the attraction of a video - Everything Wrong with Revenant in 7 seconds or less...
This guy has no chill when it comes to movies haha like I’d love to see him make a movie and watch just how FUCKING TERRIBLE IT WOULD BE! Lmao 😂
What about the hypothermia they would have all died from after getting soaked in such a cold environment?
but he did mention that
Ohhh, that he did. Well on the plus side, it's the first time I've been wrong today :)
What he failed to mention was the fur coat would get super heavy soaked in water, and we'd be watching Titanic all over again.
These were frontiersmen and they were used to living outdoors, they were tough as nails
Being tough as nails doesnt mean you're immune to cold weather fucking lmao.
Everything Wrong With Alien (1979)
"This asshole gets nearly-drowned on the strength of his Maze Runner performance alone!!"
Will, you are fantastic actor.
Do Deadpool!!! C'mon Now. That's what everyone wants to see
Everyone wants either Deadpool or Zootopia
well we got Zootopia...
The Revenant should be renamed '1,000 Ways to Die In The West Unless You're Leonardo DiCaprio"
Did anyone else not love this movie? I really can't pin down what I didn't like about it, but I just didn't. Just so many nature shots, which look amazing, but there are so many. The action was awesome though.
I didn't like it.
Bog standard revenge story, with the "I'm better than you so i won't finish you off myself" cliché.
The son wasn't a character just a plot device.
It was an hour longer than it needed to be and just bored the hell out of me.
+GamersLastLife thank you! finally someone Who is the Same oppinion that me
It was really, really boring. It was half an hour of story stretched into two and a half hour. All characters except for the villain were one-dimensional for the whole movie.
+karlzone2 to much tree to much crawling and grunting and well
... yes. He is still breathing. can we go on now?! the First scene is around 2 fucking minutes River, until they step in.
I rather watch a nature documentary (which I love) then this movie again. Something with David Attenborough for example. This movie was beauiful shot no doubt and under hard conditions but the acting was just spitting and yelling where is my Boyuuh! Leo shouldnt deserve oscar for this, problem with Leo is he always had one oscar nominee who was just
better then him that year
This channel used to be smart and funny. Now it’s just annoying.
He gave it a sin because a scene reminds hims of mortal kombat?? Wtf
When I saw this channel, associated with this movie.... I cringed.
juan da don juan da don Exactly😂
Please do conjuring 2 for your next one
He can only do a Sins video if the movie is out on DVD/Blu-Ray. That movie is barely in theatres, so it's not gonna happen for awhile.
+Exemplar Kyle That's what I'm saying. I keep thinking that when people keep requesting Zootopia
DO ZOOTOPIA!!!!!!!
yeah
Just saw it last night and came to say the same thing xD
Do you have an ifunny zootopia accout,if not you should make one.
I'VE BEEN SAYING THE EXACT SAME THING!!!
Yes please!
Glass' story is great, but I feel John Colter's would be better
as a movie, that it
Love the fight scene at the end.
0:53 Vultures were there because of the dead animals.
This is actually my 2nd favorite movie.
what's the first?
+Péter Stangl Pulp fiction
+Jckuz1man What point are you trying to prove? That I shouldn't like something I love?
Honestly I don't understand how one can love this movie so much either. It was like 60 minutes of movie stretched out into two and a half hours. I mean... sure the cinematography is pretty, but that's like all its got going for it. Every character except Fitzgerald is completely one dimensional too.
+karlzone2 well, I disagree with you. That's as far as I'll go with that.
Just started the video and I will eat my shoe if there is no grunting bonus round
Guess I'm eating my shoe
Enjoy your shoe!
Putting ketchup well help
Should I eat the Nikes or dr Martins?
Dr. Martens, it's healthy for your bones, it's also vegan.
would vultures be hovering over a spot where death is only 20 seconds old? uhh, this is a hunting camp where they were just skinning multiple elk.
please can you do everything wrong with Zootopia/Zootropolis ?
Yeah I've been waiting for it for so long!!!
TheGeorginator me too
Yes! I loved the film but it was hard to find things that I found to be wrong with the film
I want this also
Different names for different countries *ding*
You guys need to do The Boy...
that sounds so wrong...but I love it
even more wrong...
Hoang Minh Nguyen I like tight things....which are my tight ab muscles. I wasn't being dirty
no homo tho
They do
One of the shorter EWW videos.
Also KFP3, Zootopia, DEADPOOL pleaseeeeeeee!
ALL OF THIS, but I think that you have to let some time pass between the presence of this movies on cinemas to do this kind of videos.
Run
yaassssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss
Yessssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss
Yes PLEEEEAAAASE
common man you sinned the movie for how realistic the bear fight was AND sinned it cause he ate the meat raw when he was starving???? those were undeserved
Do "Everything wrong with Zootopia" so i can argue with your response. It is flawless.
Totally agree with you there.
Actually I did catch some sins in the movie
Even the film make admitted to some mistakes, like Judy being a hare, not a bunny( they said they did this so not to confuse little kids) or the tranquilizer gun from the trailers wasn't in the movie.
A lot of it is too on the nose, and the entire concept makes no sense
watch YMS zootopia
it was a pretty good film. however there wasn't much acting in it. compare the acting in wolf of Wallstreet to this. i mean very different styles but the acting cred goes to wolf, i dont like the story but the acting is way better.
act in pain and crawl that's 3/4 of the movie
best actor should have gone to the villain
That is what makes it amazing! To express emotion through words is easier for actors. Leo expressed all emotion through actions. He 100% deserved his oscar.
Abdullah Amer any actor could have done that, it takes a dedicated actor for wolf of Wallstreet
Donna Transblack Asian Coalburning AttackHelicopter sorry but the bear didn't seem real to me
what, no Gollum reference with the fish eating scene? :'(
Apparently Leo really ate the raw meat, that's dedication
When a CinemaSins video has under 100 sins INCLUDING the bonus round, you know that's a damn good movie.
Will you sin PULP FICTION already???
Lol Forreal. He's sinned so many of tarantinos films already you'd think he would just do that one already
I want that so bad
+FrontYardWrestling99 i apologize, for some reason i was wanting to think that he sinned reservoir dogs, kill bill, and inglorious basterds 😕
i know right. been waiting for it for ages now
I've heard about Revenants but never seen one in a movie before
Yet there's no actual Revenants in it
+Dragonhero leo was the revenant
+GrimL0gic
Really?? Oh.. Thanks
There's a cool gore movie called The Revenant, comedy style. It's fucking good.
whats a revenant?
You can take off a lot of sins knowing the movie has been inspired by a real story
He never had a kid, and it doesn't follow a majority of the real story!
Michael Taylor exact. Reality was way worse.
EVERYTHING WRONG WITH ZOOTOPIA
I watched it for the first time tonight and I was liteRALLY JUST SITTINg ABSENTMINDEDLY SINNING It
yep
YES. Even though the movie was awesome, it's got to have a few sins here and there.
Yeah I saw a ton of sins when I saw it!!! It would also have a ton of That's Racist sins
+TheGeorginator And the fact that night howlers are LITERALLY the Disney-fied version of crack
73 is pretty low for such a long movie...surprised he had to get so nit picky...
+FrontYardWrestling99 73 before bonus round
The movie was hugely boring and didn't show a whole lot of anything, not even dialogue for 2.5 hours... that should automatically add 100 sins. What can you nitpick with 2.5 hours of silence and cinematography?
+Logician the silence was what made it so good
+Logician boring? The opening sequence alone was worth the price. It had slow spots, yes, but so does every movie.
For one of the movies he sins it's rare for him not to break 100. Then again this was a brilliant movie.
the river scene where he was "swimming". The reason he wouldn’t get hit in the river is because of Newton’s first law of motion. An object in motion stays in motion, until acted apon by an outside force. The water stopped the arrows from hitting him.