Acute Limb Ischemia - CRASH! Medical Review Series

[@thedust850]

Thank you very much. This cleared up a lot of questions i had

[@mikkelbakjensen2350]

Thank you for the serie on vascular surgery.

[@vhperches]

Awesome work man. Very clear and informative

[@DrDinooshDeLivera]

Thank you Dr. Bolin!

[@knunniek.9304]

Thank you

[@B0Sajwah]

Cheers dr ballin'. appreciate the lecture

[@oktahira3985]

thanks for information

[@ednaooi3923]

Thank you :)

[@SY-iy2ym]

very good teaching video.

[@rameshprasadupadhayay6447]

informative one.. thanks

[@HafizahHoshni]

Awesomely informative and perfectly explained! Thank you so much! 😊😊 12/8/2019

[@mayroc17]

thank you !!

[@user-mr3iv7bj6n]

ur great thank u soooo much iam realy lucky when i find this video

[@lujaina8247]

Well informative!!, thank you :)

[@drankushgoyal5775]

Amazing

[@jeffescanto]

that classification is not rutherford, its fontine

[@Joe_Lj]

Correct, the classification at 18:00 is Fontaine.

[@andrez19]

@@Joe_Lj this is indeed Rutherford. Fontaine is the classification for the peripheral arterial occlusive disease

[@marijakostic666]

Great

[@siedmohammed735]

Question: in Acute Limb Ischemia, for the complication myoglobinuria , do we see RBCs in UA if yes why?
Because the myoglobin is from the muscular tissue so why do we see RBCs in urine as discussed in this video lecture?

[@norazlynazlan326]

i think he just use “RBC” to symbolize the red urine. it’s still myoglobin in the urine, not RBC.

[@MushroomKing30]

It’s not so much that there is rbc in the urine, it’s just that the reagent in the dipstick cannot differentiate between hemoglobin and myoglobin, so it appears as +RBC when in actuality it was myoglobin

[@sarahtamaly3587]

السلام عليكم thanks a lot islam

[@FarPreeya]

Thank you