Question: in Acute Limb Ischemia, for the complication myoglobinuria , do we see RBCs in UA if yes why? Because the myoglobin is from the muscular tissue so why do we see RBCs in urine as discussed in this video lecture?
It’s not so much that there is rbc in the urine, it’s just that the reagent in the dipstick cannot differentiate between hemoglobin and myoglobin, so it appears as +RBC when in actuality it was myoglobin
Thank you very much. This cleared up a lot of questions i had
Thank you for the serie on vascular surgery.
Awesome work man. Very clear and informative
Thank you Dr. Bolin!
Thank you
Cheers dr ballin'. appreciate the lecture
thanks for information
Thank you :)
very good teaching video.
informative one.. thanks
Awesomely informative and perfectly explained! Thank you so much! 😊😊 12/8/2019
thank you !!
ur great thank u soooo much iam realy lucky when i find this video
Well informative!!, thank you :)
Amazing
that classification is not rutherford, its fontine
Correct, the classification at 18:00 is Fontaine.
@@Joe_Lj this is indeed Rutherford. Fontaine is the classification for the peripheral arterial occlusive disease
Great
Question: in Acute Limb Ischemia, for the complication myoglobinuria , do we see RBCs in UA if yes why?
Because the myoglobin is from the muscular tissue so why do we see RBCs in urine as discussed in this video lecture?
i think he just use “RBC” to symbolize the red urine. it’s still myoglobin in the urine, not RBC.
It’s not so much that there is rbc in the urine, it’s just that the reagent in the dipstick cannot differentiate between hemoglobin and myoglobin, so it appears as +RBC when in actuality it was myoglobin
السلام عليكم thanks a lot islam
Thank you