@42:30 A possible solution to some of the scratching/defacing of coins might be that some people with access to large numbers of them, were using a tool like a plane to remove small slivers of silver from the raised areas, in order to "clip" the coins in a less obvious manner.
What would famous figures who we quoted from the past say now that would be quotable. This will be one of the other interesting things about AI is basically being able to question individuals from the past.
Ozzie Aborigines seem to have been extremely "unadvanced", in relation to the British and European Neolithic peoples. The European late Stone Age folk were inventive and workerman-like, in comparison: peoples who wanted to advance themselves. They were the technological experts of their day.
I love your Q&A sessions. I would love to see some time with the farm shop . Maybe even interviews with family members that are involved with the working the farm/farmshop. and of course, the cows and other animals. We see all about the improvements and mechanicals of the farm but I woud like to see more about and with the animals, cows, sheep, goats, highlands, Keep getting your voice heard. People have to understand that yes, a tractor is worth alot of money, a big asset, but without it, you can not run the farm . It is an asset but not something you can sell to raise money and still run the family farm
I wondered for a long time why archeologists always think they are ritual sites. Just one look at the charts that show the amount of human endeavour needed to live a subsistence lifestyle, shows that only in recent modern times, people have had enough leisure time outside of spending every working hour to scrape a living off the land. In ancient times it is FAR MORE likely that MOST structures had some connection to the hearth and home.........yes, trackways etc. are possible, as are chucking in religious objects but far more likely connected to a stone age household, defence, entranceway than some barmy road to nowhere to throw an object!
3:59 how does this have to do with the bronze age?😳🤷🏻♀️ false advertising? I don’t get it… weird 13:44 information about bronze age Village starts only here!😂
26"28 Barley bread was because not everyone could afford wheat... and today wheat bread is most common because not everyone can afford barley bread. Makes me wonder what the wealthy would think about eating food the poorest had to eat that is now expensive.
Tanks? Tip of the iceberg. I believe in Bob Dylan's, 'Masters of War'. Generals to grunts just do greedy politician's biddings. The Neolithic site is truly superb! It is ,proper, ancient history.
No idea why they are talking about the tanks armor only being good against small arms fire when that's what they were made for. They were not WWII main battle tanks in use or design they were infantry support vehicles made to fight against infantry with infantry they support. The role was more Infantry fighting vehicle than tank. A modern equivalent to a WWI tank is the Bradly IFV not a tank. And what are they on about artillery? No tank even modern can withstand WW1 artillery fire. Artillery is big guns way behind the front line(20ish miles) that fires over friendlies into the enemies side of the front line or further past. Tanks do not fire artillery, they fire directly at the target in visual range across the battlefield not up and over, if a friendly crosses that line of sight just as the main gun fires the friendly gets hit. Completely different things. May as well call the slugs from a battle rifle an arrow and you would be just as accurate as calling tank fire artillery.
You need to learn a little bit of history. The Australian army had the highest number of deserters of any army in the first world war. More than all the other allies combined.
you need a time traveller . time travel is in birmingham west midlands but it needs expandning as the wrong person got there hands on it and it is not reaching it,s full potential . 1968/69 is all it can do from this year or next
Strange this is the only time they have a moment of silence and memorial in a archeological body that died in war but no other skeleton that died in battle 🤷🏻♂️ Also why they call police sometimes but not others 😂
Considering WW1 was basically a family feud. The salty results and a megalomaniac fueling old grudges making his own sock ambitions led to WW2. Now Germany and the UK are finally civil and on the same fence. So politically it makes perfect sense. If you didn't notice it was an ex soldier that had initiated the moment of silence. If they weren't there. The diggers probably wouldn't bother. They call police if it's on public property or residential to report that remains are found. They don't always film it but common sense would dictate they legally have to.
@EverettvonNordeck-gf2cw absolutely agree.....I don't understand why the original question was even asked....it's almost as though people just want to start pointless arguments in online comments 😂😂😂😂
Copy right. You can get away with reposting documentaries and getting ad money providing the content is fairly obscure. Digging for Britain may have its own channel or is on the BBC channel
@Rydonattelo There are some sketchy channels but this one is owned by a company that licenses series from the TV companies. They have several different themed channels on UA-cam. The title just catches the eye more than 'Digging for Britain."
Alice and Raksha! Oh the time team memories.... RIP Mick
@42:30 A possible solution to some of the scratching/defacing of coins might be that some people with access to large numbers of them, were using a tool like a plane to remove small slivers of silver from the raised areas, in order to "clip" the coins in a less obvious manner.
aye
Agreed. A platform for nicking other coins.
I need more documentaries on “deviant burials” it’s so fascinating!!!
“Tanks for playing war with me” Patton, 1943. : )
Read my new book 1001 fake quotes from history : )
What would famous figures who we quoted from the past say now that would be quotable. This will be one of the other interesting things about AI is basically being able to question individuals from the past.
As an aussie, i dont blame the men in the tanks, i blame the design of the tanks and the army leaders who used them
This is a view ALOT of Aussies share
This _was_ the first use, they didn't really know what the tanks weren't capable of. Rushed, insufficient testing.
Ozzie Aborigines seem to have been extremely "unadvanced", in relation to the British and European Neolithic peoples. The European late Stone Age folk were inventive and workerman-like, in comparison: peoples who wanted to advance themselves. They were the technological experts of their day.
@@thekaxmax with lots of "guinea-pigs" to use up, as they experimented with these tracked monstrosities. A far cry from the Panther KF51 of today.
@@KernowekTim [looks at all the things developed and built by Koori] yeah, nah
Fascinating. . Thank you .
I love your Q&A sessions. I would love to see some time with the farm shop . Maybe even interviews with family members that are involved with the working the farm/farmshop. and of course, the cows and other animals. We see all about the improvements and mechanicals of the farm but I woud like to see more about and with the animals, cows, sheep, goats, highlands, Keep getting your voice heard. People have to understand that yes, a tractor is worth alot of money, a big asset, but without it, you can not run the farm . It is an asset but not something you can sell to raise money and still run the family farm
It's easy to say " cowardice"
Especially for someone not used to modern warfare
What a surprise. A British television program proves the British were not cowards of what the Australians accused them of.
What's your point?
Seems to be a fair amount of British posturing these days
I wondered for a long time why archeologists always think they are ritual sites. Just one look at the charts that show the amount of human endeavour needed to live a subsistence lifestyle, shows that only in recent modern times, people have had enough leisure time outside of spending every working hour to scrape a living off the land. In ancient times it is FAR MORE likely that MOST structures had some connection to the hearth and home.........yes, trackways etc. are possible, as are chucking in religious objects but far more likely connected to a stone age household, defence, entranceway than some barmy road to nowhere to throw an object!
In case of doubt the choice is always: ritual.
That's what I think after following TimeTeam series for many years.
If you want past the tank stuff, start here 13:43
Thank you.
Yep. So boring
@41:00 Well, I have had early Victorian 'Bun pennies' in my change on 'buses in the 1960s so 100 plus coins were not unusual.
Content i haven't watched yet@ 14:00in yay! Must have fallen asleep that upload😂
Obrigado pelo áudio em português do Brasil!
3:59 how does this have to do with the bronze age?😳🤷🏻♀️
false advertising? I don’t get it… weird
13:44 information about bronze age Village starts only here!😂
26"28 Barley bread was because not everyone could afford wheat... and today wheat bread is most common because not everyone can afford barley bread. Makes me wonder what the wealthy would think about eating food the poorest had to eat that is now expensive.
Finding human remains from the War, are they hopefully identified via dna/location to return the remains to any living family?
Could the aurochs have been used to drag the megaliths?
Tanks? Tip of the iceberg. I believe in Bob Dylan's, 'Masters of War'. Generals to grunts just do greedy politician's biddings. The Neolithic site is truly superb! It is ,proper, ancient history.
No idea why they are talking about the tanks armor only being good against small arms fire when that's what they were made for. They were not WWII main battle tanks in use or design they were infantry support vehicles made to fight against infantry with infantry they support. The role was more Infantry fighting vehicle than tank. A modern equivalent to a WWI tank is the Bradly IFV not a tank.
And what are they on about artillery? No tank even modern can withstand WW1 artillery fire. Artillery is big guns way behind the front line(20ish miles) that fires over friendlies into the enemies side of the front line or further past. Tanks do not fire artillery, they fire directly at the target in visual range across the battlefield not up and over, if a friendly crosses that line of sight just as the main gun fires the friendly gets hit. Completely different things. May as well call the slugs from a battle rifle an arrow and you would be just as accurate as calling tank fire artillery.
Professor Alice Roberts 🤤❤️
Not the first time the British left their Allies without the support they said they were going to provide.
Lest We Forget never
You need to learn a little bit of history. The Australian army had the highest number of deserters of any army in the first world war. More than all the other allies combined.
@ more British propaganda.
you need a time traveller . time travel is in birmingham west midlands but it needs expandning as the wrong person got there hands on it and it is not reaching it,s full potential . 1968/69 is all it can do from this year or next
Strange this is the only time they have a moment of silence and memorial in a archeological body that died in war but no other skeleton that died in battle 🤷🏻♂️ Also why they call police sometimes but not others 😂
Considering WW1 was basically a family feud. The salty results and a megalomaniac fueling old grudges making his own sock ambitions led to WW2. Now Germany and the UK are finally civil and on the same fence. So politically it makes perfect sense. If you didn't notice it was an ex soldier that had initiated the moment of silence. If they weren't there. The diggers probably wouldn't bother. They call police if it's on public property or residential to report that remains are found. They don't always film it but common sense would dictate they legally have to.
@EverettvonNordeck-gf2cw absolutely agree.....I don't understand why the original question was even asked....it's almost as though people just want to start pointless arguments in online comments 😂😂😂😂
Towsands of years?
Thoosands aye. Or.....Faahzans aah fink: as the London English say.
Dont you think that things can be "towsands" of years old???? Do you think maybe that the earth is flat 😂😂😂😂
@ukwhitewitch The Earth is an oblate spheroid and is 4.54 billion years old.
Too many ads. Forget it.
What’s with the title of this video?? The show is called “digging for Britain”
Host is gorgeous
maybe they're trying to avoid a copyright claim ...
Copy right. You can get away with reposting documentaries and getting ad money providing the content is fairly obscure. Digging for Britain may have its own channel or is on the BBC channel
@Rydonattelo There are some sketchy channels but this one is owned by a company that licenses series from the TV companies. They have several different themed channels on UA-cam. The title just catches the eye more than 'Digging for Britain."
Greetings from Australia. Yes Alice is definitely elegant and beautiful. I'll grant you that my friend.
Re run of a re run of a rerere run seen it go by four of five times now. Boring.
Bitterly cold winter unearthing ditch!??? There summer leaves on trees 🌲 🌳 🌳
Aye. They dropped a clanger with that one. Perhapr the swallows hadn't arrived late that "winter".
This is a repeat.
what the hell is he crying for he ain't even related to him I'm off this see you!!!