@Shep Raynham haven't heard that line before. Maybe that's what vincent meant although he built on the original comment and the original comment seems to be simply "the rich people aren't impacted and will continue to do what they want to while we have to do things in our own lives but they dont"
They are beyond evil especially the big oil companys, what happend in africa and middel east. We condenm russia what they are doing to the people in Ukraine, shell bp exxon what they did is just as bad, but they did it just for more profits.I am not saying Russia is good far far from it, But it shows the big companys can just get away what anything they do! BP/Shell does not care if londen burns all the better for them if they can turn a profit from it.
@Shep Raynham hey shep. You're missing an e.. catch it eee.... sheep. Instead of studying BBC, cnn, nytimes and "climatologists" etc you could study geological, astrophysical and biological data of the geologic ages of the the earth. Then maybe you could realize that the only thing that changed on earth is the access to information and most important the far reach of propaganda. The climate of the earth continues its cycles, small and large, THE SUN does also. There are 3 things man-made affecting the climate, metropolitan areas full of heat absorbing asphalt and cement that affect the local climate enormously and that's what 90% of the people feel as "climate change" (guess what.. they want even more people concentrated in the cities)... and.. the deforestation of the planet, the destruction of the earths lungs that exchange the co2 we produce by breathing with lifegiving oxygen. Those forests are destroyed by the same parasites that blame everything on everyday people. Earth has a perfectly tuned biosphere, perfect to produce and support life, the more co2 you give the more plant life it produces and then more oxygen and food is produced to support more life. Lastly, planned obsolescence, who made all industry work by this model? Us? The consumers or the billioners that suddenly care about the environment? What if Apple, intel, Nvidia, samsung and all similar companies didn't produce a damn new device every year trying to make the previous obsolete and instead supported your old devices? Google cares so much that every new Android update makes all old devices obsolete and useless.. Industrial production of new devices in 6 month cycles is 1million times more harmful for the environment than all cars, stoves and aircons combined. If they care why do they make it harder to use lng gas in my car when it actually produces a more complete combustion thus less harmful gases? Why they NEVER supported the use of motorcycles in the west as a much more efficient alternative to cars?
The COP Conference 1 was 30 years ago. We have had 25 more COP conferences, and yet here we are, still addicted to fossil fuels. If we haven't done it in 30 years, can you really see us doing anything in the next decade, like we have to?
COP summits are proving to be little better than nice little get togethers for world leaders. If the worst offenders can't even be bothered to show up, go home mid-way through, or chuck all their promises away within just a few days of the conference, then they are more or less pointless.
The big issue is the Climate Alarmist have created a massive division with their down right lies. For example we had XR telling us the Earth would end in 25 years. How can you take this seriously. I just don’t believe a word of it now, the only thing we get from it is increased Green Taxes
Co2 has NEVER been a problem in the past when the levels were in the THOUSANDS of ppm, why do YOU think its a problem now ? I think you really need to research the greenhouse properties of Co2.
@@UkSapyy YES I HAVE!, i have been looking at this issue for more than 44 years since it was dangerous human induced global cooling, promoted by the same groups and some of the same scientists as dangerous human induced global warming now. Back then they wanted to sprinkle carbon black on the poles to melt the ice TO SAVE THE PLANET, and wanted governments to build more coal fired power stations to pump as much Co2 into the atmosphere as possible TO SAVE THE PLANET. I wager i probably know more about this issue than you do. I speak to scientists face to face including those who have worked for the IPCC. But seeing YOU think otherwise let see you complete this very simple quiz. Q. At what atmospheric concentration of Co2 does it produce its greatest warming effect ? Q. Does a doubling of the atmospheric concentration of Co2 produce more or less additional warming ? Q. What percentage of the annual out gassing of Co2 into the atmosphere is from non human sources ? Q.According to the AGW hypothesis which greenhouse gas is almost entirely responsible for the dangerous global warming feedback loop ? Q.What volume of the atmosphere does Co2 represent ? Q. Based on the paleoclimate data does atmospheric Co2 levels have very good or very poor correlation with the temperature cycles ? Q. Based on the ice core data does rising atmospheric Co2 levels drive up temperature or does rising temperatures drive up atmospheric Co2 levels ? Q.Do atmospheric Co2 concentrations COOL the atmosphere ? Q.Based on the ice core data do higher atmospheric levels of Co2 prevent subsequent cooling ? Q.Which is the most powerful and by far greatest volume of greenhouse gas in the atmosphere ? Q.Based on the physics of Co2 should there have been more additional warming or less additional warming when atmospheric Co2 levels were 100 ppm lower than now ? Q.Define climate and how it is measured ? These should take you about five minutes to answer FROM MEMORY lets see what you know if anything.
Actually its around 1.5 mm pa, they are using dodgy satellite data or the mixed and averaged satellite data that greatly exaggerates the actual level of rise. They do that here too our most accurate tide gauge shows sea levels falling in Sydney Harbor .
@@peterjones4180 Sea temperatures are rising - when you heat water it expands - there are a few areas where land is still rising eg Finland , after being compressed by ice in the past. So give us a link to the Sydney data.
@@auldfouter8661 As a matter of policy i never ASK for links and data and i NEVER give them, this is publicly available data you should have no problem finding it with research. THAT is what I do. To make it easier for you the gauge is at Fort Denison where the measured level of sea level rise is LESS than the rate of site subsidence. You are correct some coastlines are rising some sinking internationally, and the satellite data has greatly exaggerated past sea level due to instrument problems acknowledged by NASA.
Most of them are GROWING in size. Many are coral atolls, which are sunken/sinking volcanoes which have moved off the volcanic hot spot which bulges the crust upwards, topped with coral growth which forms the island, as the volcano continues to sink, the coral growth keeps up with the rate of sinking and forms the atoll from coral sand. The inhabitants have chosen to live in a location that has always been doomed to eventually sink. The same is true of Hawaii, the Emperor seamounts are the sunken remains of the original Hawaiian islands.
You are correct , but then from around 1890 to the late 1930's we had warming, then from 1940 to 1977 we had COOLING again, from 1977 to 1998 we had warming, since then the cooling has equaled the warming.
It's not broken. It's just going through changes. Nothing that humans can't adapt to. So you can stop crying. Flip-flops are quite normal here in Thailand. You Brits will just have to jolly well get used to wearing them.
Haha 😂 nice one buddy, I’m in Britain myself and what people need to realise is, we’re a just a tiny little island that can be swallowed up by the sea at anytime so I’ll pass on the flip flops Skajd my friend, take care of yourself buddy from Stevie boy in Britain.
What the UK average graph shows is a warming from around 7.8 C to around 9.3 C over 130 years. That's an elevation of 1.5 C compared with global temperature rises of 1.2 C, or an additional 0.3 C on top of global average temperature rise. That additional warming is even greater on continents and will have serious implications for food production. The 'fat tail' of weather extremes, like that that gives the 40 C temperature records, will give rise to even greater and more frequent severe weather events.
Utter rubbish !, get your facts RIGHT !, warming reduces the temperature difference between the poles and the equator this REDUCES extreme weather ! What graph ? we have had around .7 Deg C warming over the last 150 years.
@@peterjones4180 "Utter rubbish !, get your facts RIGHT !, warming reduces the temperature difference between the poles and the equator this REDUCES extreme weather !" Warming increases severe weather events as there is more energy in the system. Accelerated warming of the Arctic and Antarctic decreases the temperature difference between the polar and temperate regions causing increased sinusoidicity in the jet streams causing 'blocking' of cold regions further south and heat waves in the Arctic. Such blocking has caused severe cold in Texas which caused their grid to collapse while causing more heat waves on Greenland leading to record ice melts. The same phenomenon has caused blocking over Europe and California leading to increased water stress, heat waves and forest fires. The tropics are warming faster hence the bleaching of coral reefs and the warming of the Pacific and stronger El Nino and La Nina events. Warming land is between 1.5 and 2.0 times greater than global average temperature rises and even greater in land on continental land masses which causes more droughts and heatwaves. Increased global average temperature create more evaporation leading to more flooding and more heat energy creating stronger tornadoes. Arctic temperatures are rising about 4 times faster than global average temperature rises. How about you get your facts right. "What graph ? we have had around .7 Deg C warming over the last 150 years." The graph at 1:05 in the video from Met Office data shows a difference of 1.5 C over 130 years. How about you learn to pay attention.
@@JugglinJellyTake01 The MET office graph IS WRONG !, they are public servants and BOUND to support government policy ! Its government policy to support the global warming narrative and so THEY DO !. You see the same in the U.S with the change of government there has been a flurry of data removal from departmental websites and the now censored graphs have replaced them. They CANNOT be trusted without checking the data, SAME here, the BOM has gone to extraordinary lengths to distort our temperature records and has REWRITTEN IT THREE TIMES ! You are incorrect the energy produced is lower, the winds that create severe storms ARE DRIVEN BY THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE POLES AND THE EQUATOR , warming poles produce a lower gradient and DECREASE the severity of storms, that is the official position of the worlds most experienced meteorologists, the physics are clear . Much of the heat energy is sucked up from the surface and pumped out to space by cumulus and stratocumulus clouds as a gigantic heat pump. The effects you ascribe to sinusoidicity in the jet streams causing 'blocking' of cold regions further south and heat waves in the Arctic are real but the system is far more complex than you state and NOT relevant to my statement. I remind you that the mild warming we have had HAS NOT RESULTED IN AN INCREASING OF EITHER MORE FREQUENT OR MORE SEVERE WEATHER EVENTS !, what you have stated IS NOT HAPPENING. Coral reefs bleach in response to colder temperatures, warmer temperatures , fresh water, no water. There is NO apparent increase in GBR bleaching the reefs are doing fine, in fact the same species that bleach in warmer water here at times DO NOT bleach at significantly warmer temperatures further north in fact corals PREFER warmer water than on the GBR, its the various species of commensal zooxanthellae that cause the bleaching some species are adapted to cooler and some to warmer waters this is what allows coral to live in a wide range of temperatures, when temperatures cool below tolerance for that species the corals expel them and uptake other species from the water column, the same is true for warmer water where they expel the cooler tolerant species and uptake warmer adapted species. We are NOT experiencing MORE droughts OR heatwaves, the work on drought has been done here and there is NO LINK between warming and drought, in fact overall its been trending a bit wetter here. We are NOT experiencing more floods either. A significant driver of increased rainfall is volcanic eruptions. And tornadoes have been decreasing for a long time now, the same is true for wildfire in the U.S, which was MUCH greater in the 1920's. I remind YOU the oceans are NOT heated by long wave IR radiation that only penetrates a um, the oceans are heated by SUNLIGHT THAT penetrates up to several hundred feet. So ocean heating is the result of the amount of sunlight reaching the surface and the underlying temperature of the water mass, cloud cover has a large effect on this atmospheric temperature does not. Theory says the POLES SHOULD rise faster than the equator SO WHAT ! Interestingly the Antarctic has been COOLING OVERALL for around 35 Years. You need to go back and IGNORE what your government and the media says and look at the data, I HAVE , most of what YOU claim is happening IS NOT HAPPENING. As for Greenland overall there is still lots more ice there than 1000 years ago, as to your brief bit of warm weather THAT IS WEATHER NOT CLIMATE , Greenland will soon go back to the COOLING it has been experiencing.
Climate alarmist statement, you do know the Earth was far hotter in the past, hence why we had those big reptiles walking around. You have to define normal, not make up a random number.
That’s the big issue, setting a realistic baseline. After all we had giant reptiles walking the planet at one time so we know the temperature was far higher then.
I think the Jerry mations account has Dunning-Kruger pole poistion: "Went to Blackpool in 1975 when I was 9. Sea is still exactly the same level there today." D'uh with a capital "W".
MR my best buddy, where have you been? Well I didn’t take your advice on the fake vaccine and have avoided covid. What words of wisdom are you saying today?
@@spencerkay6131 THAT is NOT likely to happen before the onset of the next glacial and another 100000 years of bitter cold and ice sheets covering much of the earth, with sea levels one again 130 meters lower than now. Sea level rise of 1.5 mm pa will take an enormous time to cover hills.
There is definitely a trend of increasing temperatures and it simply does not matter if it is manmade or not. Higher temperatures make life for humans harder or even impossible depending on the area where someone lives. Therefore, we need to do whatever we can to keep temperatures as close to where they are now as we can. Those who deny that it is man made forget that it affects us no matter whether it is man made or something that would happen anyway. It needs to be kept in check as best we can.
Yep. When I was younger in Lincolnshire, UK family friend's would come over and we had a snowball fight on that week. Now I don't see enough snow in a year to throw a snow ball. Vs a random week.
Actually there has been NO overall warming for most of the last 25 years. Warming humans can handle , COOLING kills in large numbers. It should NOT be necessary to remind you that the two previous interglacials were much warmer than ours has ever been, AND that the peak warmings have been getting SHORTER and COOLER over the last 8000 years, starting at the warmest, the Holocene warmings 8000 and 6000 years ago then the Minoan 3000 years ago then the Roman 2000 years ago and the Medieval 1000 years ago these were ALL warmer than our current warming. Co2 IS NOT and never has been a major forcing on temperature, the paleoclimate and ice core data makes that quite clear. So how do YOU plan to alter the suns orbit, control its variable energy output, its magnetic storms and solar wind, cosmic rays AND high altitude clouds, the oceans currents and cycles this i would love to hear.
@@peterjones4180 "Actually there has been NO overall warming for most of the last 25 years." Your evidence for that? Please remember, gut feelings do NOT count. Please specify exactly which data you used to come to this conclusion. If you cannot provide that, we know what to think of your ramblings.
Rising temperatures ended the last ice age...it's a normal weather cycle. Just a few thousand years ago, the Sahara desert was all green and covered with grass. If you think the climate change is your fault and that you can change the natural cycle of the earth's climate... good luck, but the reality is that the last ice age ended not too long ago, and the rising temperatures will continue regardless of humans. It's just a normal weather cycle.
Well the Arctic ice cap, the Greenland and Antarctic pack ice and ice shelves already displace their full volume of water so if they were to melt there would be NO increase in sea level from that. Whats warms ocean water, the SHORT wave radiation from sunlight that penetrates hundreds of feet, re radiated long wave IR from greenhouse gases only penetrates a few Um into the oceans and has almost no effect, and most of that is coming from water vapor.
The ICE age was man made, honest. Grab your life jackets and place them covering your television, the severity of fear will be diminished and you can go enjoy the weather, what ever that might be. Unfortunately house fires have been a thing since houses but we will show you one anyway, and make out it’s your fault for being born, unless you smother your tv in a global warming life jacket. Stay safe, enjoy the weather, don’t let them take your happiness 😎🛟
Record-keeping is vital: objective, consistently methodical taking of measurements allows us to extend our knowledge back further than the memories of those very old folk who have still got good recall, and tree-ring studies, ice and soil cores etc provide further corroboration when records & memories & diaries and folk oral history via myths and legends are compared.
When I look at travel programmes in uk I see small coastal towns on estuaries that have not altered in terms of sea levels for hundreds of years. Also major tide gauges do not show any rise in increased sea levels in the past 100 years
Unfortunately the science is extremely distorted, anyone with a brain knows the temperatures in the past were far higher, hence why we had giant reptiles walking the Earth. Sea levels do vary by a vast amount but these are largely due to the gravitational pull from moon and occasionally from other planets. The climate alarmist just love a drama.
You think you could detect a 3mm rise by watching a travel programme. I hope you're either just trolling or satirising the stupidity of other commenters making similar claims.
Because the circumference of the coastline coupled with the diameter of the starfish that are aligned with the sun as it passes through the solar system on it's way to the Andromeda galaxy via the pull of the super massive black hole which was caused when the big bang started and reduces the influx of illegal immigrants into this country which is why neither Rishi Sunak or Liz Truss should become PM. 🤓👍
You need to go much further back than the 1880”s to see what’s going on, every 6000 years there’s a sharp rise and fall in temperature, guess what we are due this right now, yes C02 levels doesn’t help but it’s not the whole story!!..🤔🤔🤔😳😳😳
You're so close to understanding. Yes, the climate changes over massive, massive periods of time. But now, it's changing incredibly rapidly, over only a few human generations, because of human actions. And it will change too rapidly for our ecosystems, crops and cities to manage
@@nicci24 NO !, its NOT changing rapidly !, the data shows that clearly , YOU are being told its changing rapidly BUT IT IS NOT. The warming we had post 1977 is similar to ALL the previous warnings measured since we have had thermometers . The highest number of broken high temperature records in the U.S was in the 1930's , MOST still stand, that also goes for the longest periods of hot weather.
Where is the sea level rise info from, it cant be confined to UK can it. Utter nonsense. Everything is always a CRYSIS in Uk . Just seems like another below par summer to me.
Well in fact they are rising at a TINY rate, with NO sign of acceleration. It is complex because not only do sea levels rise but so do coastlines, some of which also fall, and then you have the problem of reclaimed land subsiding, or land subsiding because fresh water is being pumped out of it . Currently the most accurate tool we have for measuring sea levels are stable long term tide gauge records. Some of those records show FALLING sea levels , Sydney Harbor Fort Denison is a case in point, where the subsidence is MORE than the nominal rise. Tide gauge data shows an overall rise rate of around 1.5 mm PA. At the end of the last ice age sea levels rose around 130 Meters, then around 4500 years ago there was a substantial DROP , we are currently STILL 1-2 meters lower than then, and seas have been rising slowly and intermittently ever since. There is a problem with the satellite sea level data, NASA acknowledged this years ago, the instrumentation greatly exaggerated the amount of sea level rise over a long period. So as i said the only accurate data we have is from the tide gauges, HOWEVER some scientists committed to the global warming panic PREFER to use the satellite data BECAUSE it exaggerates the rate of rise, others of that view MIX the tide gauge data with the exaggerated satellite data and then AVERAGE it which also increases the observed rate of rise. This is a very unscientific approach but this sort of thing has become common over the last few decades. So yes sea levels are rising overall but the amount of perceived rise depends on where you are. Most media coverage of the issue is simply propaganda, if the Arctic ice, and the Greenland coastal ice shelves , AND the Antarctic pack ice and ice shelves ALL melted tomorrow that would raise world sea levels by ........ZERO MILLIMETERS !. That is because they already displace their full volume of water. Hope that helps
I am living next to the sea for past 79 years in Sri Sri Lanka. The sea has not risen an inch in that time. How come it rises where you are. I think you need to check your measurements or your brain. I will opt for the latter.
So... having just wasted half an hour of my life researching the Sri Lankan Government's climate resources, I discover that, while you are mostly completely wrong, you are nevertheless correct in one vital respect - sea level rise for Sri Lanka is not reported using the Imperial measurement of the 'inch'.
Yep when you listen its always, IF, PERHAPS,POSSIBLY. Try and find a replicated peer reviewed published scientific paper that says HUMAN EMISSIONS OF Co2 are CAUSING DANGEROUS GLOBAL WARMING. You wont find one. The first two IPCC scientific reports made the finding that we currently have no credible data that demonstrates human emissions of Co2 are causing dangerous global warming, so the IPCC bureaucracy arranged to have that finding on the second report REVERSED to match the advice for policymakers report.
Neil nothing is going to collapse, you are being manipulated by clever people using propaganda. Temperatures have always varied, you don’t go panicking because you have a few weeks of amazing weather wasted by a few arsonist. You should be more concerned by who is behind the coordinated arson attacks and whose message is now being propagated because of this.
@@peterjones4180 its becomes they know it has nothing to do with us humans it is more likely far bigger than man made and is a galaxy ruling event that comes around approximately every 3000 years.
@@joecarty8579 its not just a few weeks ,,it is a temperature spike one day its about 17/22 next day its 37/42 and 24 hours later its back to 17/22 that is not a natural summer event.
C Buxton, of course it’s normal, if you have an overcast sky during the day and clear at night then temperatures will drop, if on the other hand you have a few days of clear skies then temperatures will rise. There’s no point in alarming people when we get a few weeks of great weather. If you look carefully at the stats more people die in the cold winters up here and with the price of fuel we need a few months without the heating on. You could argue that this year hundreds will die due to Green taxes on their fuel when old people can’t afford to switch on the heating. Uk electricity bill is apx 50% Green and Gov tax.
They never said it's only the UK though. They're just making a report for UK TV viewers so telling them how the global rise in sea levels affects their coast specifically.
Since about 2019 higher than normal water levels in the Great lakes caused massive wave damage. Many century old Victorian cottages were swept into the lakes. Thankfully the water levels have decreased although the damage can't be undone. Best luck UK. I hope Mother Nature behaves herself.
They claim “UK sea level is rising by 3mm to 5mm” whilst showing scary film of ferocious waves thousands of millimetres high, smashing against the coast. They are certainly being alarmist. I’ve been going to the same UK beaches for 50 years, but the tide now still comes up to the same place on the beach that it did 50 years ago! That’s not really a sea level rise is it?
I don't think you get it. These small incremental rises will amplify the impact and damage of any storm hitting the coast. These storms will only increase in frequency and ferocity, and sea level rise will continue. Over time, the upper tide line will rise, but whole communities and coastal land will be washed away by flooding long before that matters.
You do not seem to understand about storms, spring tides and extreme events. You do not understand trends. You show no awareness of the melting of the polar ice caps and the effect of continued ocean heating. Maybe give your shipbuilding a rest while you learn about what perils you’ll be in, on the sea.
@@nolongerlistless I agree that climate change is happening. I did not deny that climate change is happening. My point was that the news media are often alarmist, they like to exaggerate (probably because that’s how they make their money). Specifically, in this Channel 4 News article, as I said above, they stated that “the UK sea level rose by 3 to 5mm”, but at the same time they showed dramatic scary footage of waves thousands of millimetres high, smashing into the coast. They were telling a lie. If they wanted to be truthful, they should show some sea which is only 3 to 5mm higher. But of course, that would not sell their news stories, would it?
@@noahtheshipbuilder1778 You believe that destructive crashing waves are not part of the news story, so you want to censor out the extremes that accompany an apparently moderate ‘average’ overall increase?
@@noahtheshipbuilder1778 Listen carefully from 2:00 to 2:15... the reporter is talking about a doubling of the annual rate of sea level rise in the context of four centuries of accelerating anthropogenic global warming - a warming that produces more storms which already happen more frequently and more intensely - so that footage of a coast in a storm is from now. It is neither irrelevant nor fraudulent. It is a reminder that the sea is not a millpond but has waves and currents and ocean /sea /coastal conditions respond to and interact with the jet stream conditions in the upper atmosphere, the story that opened the news piece. If you’re saying that this excerpt is misleadingly named because it only mentions sea level rise then I agree with you. Actually it is about acceleration and tipping points that make disasters in the human world inevitable unless we act. It is as if you are complaining that because in the latest second of the latest minute out of the last 5 mins of its advance from a distance the lorry hurtling towards you, driven by a distracted driver, was only going 1m per millisecond faster than in the previous second there is no reason to take action or take cover or warn others who may still survive. Get it? You need to look at the entire piece, not focus on a single quibble with a single symptom in a vast syndrome! “Oh! I’ve got jaundice but I’m only one shade of very pale primrose more Simpson like than I was at the beginning of the cancer diagnosis I was given! The doctors are being alarmist!”
Roughly 20,000 years ago the great ice sheets that buried much of Asia, Europe and North America stopped their creeping advance. Within a few hundred years sea levels in some places had risen by as much as 10 meters-more than if the ice sheet that still covers Greenland were to melt today. This freshwater flood filled the North Atlantic and also shut down the ocean currents that conveyed warmer water from equatorial regions northward. The equatorial heat warmed the precincts of Antarctica in the Southern Hemisphere instead, shrinking the fringing sea ice and changing the circumpolar winds. As a result-and for reasons that remain unexplained-the waters of the Southern Ocean may have begun to release carbon dioxide, enough to raise concentrations in the atmosphere by more than 100 parts per million over millennia-roughly equivalent to the rise in the last 200 years. That CO2 then warmed the globe, melting back the continental ice sheets and ushering in the current climate that enabled humanity to thrive.
A few weeks ago the nuclear powered ice breaker was deployed to the artic to rescue some oil tankers stuck in thick ice. In July! It is getting colder at the Arctic. You won't hear that in the media.
There are sometimes periods of the year that the ice caps are abnormally cold. That does not mean anything of the annual net change in ice levels is negative, which it has been every year for the last 20, with the exception of 2017 in Antarctica.
@@PsilentMusicUK it is impossible for us to know. I don't trust any of the figures because there is a concerted effort to push a narrative and that narrative is not allowed to be challenged. It is anti science. However, when ships need rescuing in July from Arctic ice and you can verify the ice breaker's location then you know it is a true story. The narrative is that it has all melted and may never come back. The truth is the complete opposite. It is clear that sea levels are completely unchanged over the last 40 years. I can verify it by going to the coast. It is my experience. Old buildings right on the coast are unaffected by any imagined sea level rise. So the truth is that nothing has changed or is changing, we are just being brainwashed with huge lies on a daily basis. Geo engineering is also being used to control the weather to support the narrative. They particularly like to flood one certain area in Australia, allegedly to depopulate it. The air force got caught cloud seeding it to the point where it even got on the news. It is all watermelon communists. Green on the outside, red on the inside. The WEF is the control hub of it all. They have penetrated all the governments with their people. Look at what they are doing to Holland now! Trying to steal farm land and reduce food. Ireland the same.Canada next to have the Sri Lankan experience. Kill the cattle. It is like pol pot, stalin and Mao etc. They all end up destroying civilisation and murdering millions of people for some crazy idea. It is happening now but world wide, based on crazed ideas of climate catastrophe. If we don't call it out and stand up to it then billions will die unnecessarily. Controlling billions of people requires an excuse and what better than a cataclysmic climate hoax that threatens us all? If you ignore the media and look at the climate then what has changed? Nothing at all. Our individual experiences of decades of existence says it is unchanged so why believe numbers on a spreadsheet from corrupted "scientists" trying to convince us otherwise? They are just debt slaves who must do as they are told or lose their jobs and futures. Very easy to control. As are the media. 1976 had something like 20 days consecutively over 30 degrees C in the UK. If we are warming up the climate so fast then why have we not even got back to 1976 levels of heatwave? Not even 10 days in a row over 30 has occurred since. 2 days near 40 and then back to 20 does not compare. Indeed, why has it changed form global warming to climate change? There is no warming. Weather control technology can then be used and blamed on climate change to confuse the masses. Climate change is a meaningless term. It can mean anything to anyone. It can mean getting colder or hotter, wetter or drier and is based solely on your own experience which is actually the localised weather! Localised weather is controllable these days. You can literally buy the services online. Companies boast about it. Chinese Olympics used it. Middle East uses it. The whole climate change narrative is an evil scam, a crime against humanity.
Do a bit research. The sea ice levels are getting thinner. We have not had an artic free summer yet. When that happens the ocean currents will change. Perhaps bringing extreme winters to the UK.
@@mrfugazi6713 - Start reducing your emissions foot print on everything you do and if the 7.96 billion did the same thing and starting adapting to a warming planet, this will reduce temperature increases over a period of time.
@@chrismckellar9350 Complete bullshit ! Co2 is NOT and never has been a primary forcing on temperature the paleoclimate data and ice core data make that VERY clear. How then do YOU imagine doing any of these things will make the slightest difference to temperature.
Some of us are bigger fans of Milankovic's Cycle than CO2. In fact it's water vapour that's the biggest greenhouse gas. Without it we wouldn't be here.
@@auldfouter8661 Leonard Gibney is FACTUALLY correct. Some of us are bigger fans of Milankovic's Cycle than CO2. In fact it's water vapor that's the biggest greenhouse gas. Without it we wouldn't be here.
What people need to realize about water vapor is that it goes up as green house gases increase. As CO2 and CH4 concentrations have increased the average global temperature has warmed heat waves become more frequent and the warmer the temperature the higher humidity. Thus the warmer it feels.
@@michaeldeierhoi4096 NO !, WARMING temperatures have INCREASED Co2 and Ch4 levels over the last 300 years, humans are adding a TINY amount of Co2 annually, to the naturally increasing Co2 levels, natural Co2 emissions into the atmosphere are at least 96.25% of the annual Co2 emissions and ALL Co2 molecules are re absorbed at the SAME RATE !. You are correct about humidity however there is no data indicating ts gettng more humid overall, the atmosphere is constructed from various layers and you are thinking about only the lowest one. Heat waves are LESS frequent now than in the 1930's !
@@peterjones4180 Think what you like, however I prefer to follow the empirical data collected by researchers across the globe who recognize that humans are adding CO2 to the atmosphere at a record level. 36 BILLION tonnes of CO2 in 2021!! Even though that is a relatively small amount added every year that CO2 has increased by 50 % since the beginning of the industrial age. . That increase in CO2 retains more heat resulting in more heat waves and floods globally.
We can all fix this problem by driving around 2 tonne electric cars :) A 2 tonne electric car to transport a human of 80kg is the way forward. Very efficient :)
No they just have not told you yet that electric cars wont be a problem in the future because once the great reset is complete and Agenda 2030 implemented ONLY THE ELITES WILL BE ALLOWED TO HAVE CARS. The rest of us will walk, ride bikes or take public transport, that is the plan they are implementing. Have you read your copy of Agenda 2030 from the U.N yet ? If you wish to see your future buy a copy of Limits to Growth p 1972 by The Club of Rome they are the main group behind all of this, thats where all the policy's have come from they set up the UNEP AND the IPCC and are the IPCC's primary advisors on environmental issues. WHO are the COR ?, well they are a group of millionaires, billionaires, and former U.N bureaucrats including the owners of Standard Oil the Rockefellers set up in 1968 to take control of the environmental movement by huge funding from their associated tax free foundations, and use it for their financial advantage and to implement their geopolitical agenda. They are closely associated with the World Economic Forum.
Nonsense! The temperature reading of 40c was taken at Heathrow airport. With concrete, tarmac and jet engines. Sea level rises? Where? That was said 30 years ago and nothing.
@@julianshepherd2038 Huh? I’ve not done any research per say, nor am I aware of what your referring to about oil companies. But I do know what coastal erosion is.
Just think logically. If the 'climate' did what you wanted it to do the earth would be 9, 000 degrees C. Every day the earth heats up around the middle of the day. It doesn't carry on just getting hotter does it?
Clearly YOU have no understanding of the issue. Temperature , weather and climate are ALL within NORMAL long term variability, nothing unusual is going on.
We all want a cleaner climate. But the world has gone through this many times how different is this to the last time. Nobody knows. But carbon deposits in the ice cores show higher levels of carbon in earlier events. Volcanoes. Forrest fires. Who knows??
How much oil is used per year globally? 36.4 billion barrels Annually, global consumption is even more impressive, reaching 36.4 billion barrels consumed in 2018, according to BP. That's $2.184 trillion worth of oil consumption in a single year. In gallons, the world's annual consumption is 1.134 trillion-roughly half the amount of water found in Lake Michigan. Not to mention coal & other fossil fuels even wild fires deforestation all add up to the overwhelming climate change problem!!! God help us all!
Yes, and all that fossil fuel adds up to about 0.5 ZJ (zettajoules) of energy per year. The excess heat in the system is over 220 ZJ. Equivalent to 400 years of fossil fuel consumption at the current rate. Even if we somehow stopped using fossil fuels and removed about a trillion tonnes of CO2 (around 650 cubic km of dry ice equivalent) we would still have a huge amount of heat in the system. 1 ZJ is roughly equivalent of heating the Baltic Sea by about 1 Celsius. We have enough excess energy in the system to bring the Baltic Sea to the boil around 2 1/2 times. ~93% of that heat has gone into the oceans but as the oceans warm the solubility of gasses decreases which means a load of CO2 is dumped in the atmosphere further accelerating atmospheric warming.
@@peterjones4180 Sadly, the water underneath Antarctica’s ice shelves is connected to the global oceans which are heating rapidly, and so the ice is rapidly melting from below, whatever your air temperature readings (please indicate a source for these) might say.
That's the tide coming in then ... And then it goes out again.... Does it everyday....but if it gets hot enough then the extra sea water will evaporate and make rain somewhere and cure the drought... Its win win!
Why can’t we pick a large area of disused continent near the ocean and build a large supported pipe line miles into the sky out the atmosphere and pump sea water out into space levelling the seas and keeping up with glacier melt, yes it don’t change climate rise but will curb sea level rise, I know it’s a bit mad max but in concept it works
I bet Barack Obama is regretting spending $40 million on that beach front property, and all those other billionaires, Brad Pitt etc who have bought similar places, let’s hope they can sue however done the searches for them.
If sea levels rising how come my shore lines been the same level for over 100 years? Or did they raise the old rotten piers n stairs as it got higher 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Its a shame that when reporting climate change satellite heat images are not shown. When comparing a series of them over past years it becomes absolutely obvious that we have global warming when you see previously blue areas now turned to red! So why are these images rarely shown to the public? Showing a graph really doesn't have the same impact.
You do realize those are FALSE color images dont you ? Since you bring up the satellite data i must remind you that for most of the last 25 years we have had no overall warming and THAT includes the last 6-7 years, THAT is what the satellite data tells us.
@Daan Daan Well i have an advantage i lived through the fake DDT scare, the fake acid rain scare, the fake ozone hole scare, the fake global cooling scare and now the global warming scare. All these issues can be traced back to the same groups, and they use the same methodology time after time. They take a real thing, exaggerate it , ignore inconvenient scientific studies that demonstrate the scare is probably wrong,, use their great wealth to conduct massive international marketing campaigns and to suborn academics and university's to produce studies supporting their project.
@Daan Daan Well they have been exposed to a MASSIVE , stupendously well funded internationally coordinated marketing campaign . They are not scientific thinkers not fundamentally skeptical, and when enough media outlets keep telling them the same propaganda for decades they just accept it. Accurate studies that show problems with the propaganda are deliberately censored in the media. They are simply using the same techniques ALL socialist dictatorships use. We have a copy of the marketing campaign commissioned and designed for the U.K government long ago to SELL global warming to the public. Amongst its recommendations is that they should IGNORE any information not in line with their goals, that is why all scientific studies which demonstrate problems with their policys in this regard are simply IGNORED, science DOES NOT MATTER TO THEM, they dont care if the AGW hypothesis is correct or not in fact its just a means to justify the imposition of pre determined policy's agreed to at the Rio Earth Conference in 1992 and signed off on by our governments WITHOUT OUR AGREEMENT.
@Daan Daan Well i have no opinion on that, BUT i do know that the DDT scare was a confected lie in regard to killing off birds. Marine biologist Rachel Carson wrote Silent Spring in the late 1950's which SHE claimed she had scientific evidence that DDT was killing off birds and so we had to ban it, AND she claimed evidence of it causing cancer, her husband died of cancer and so did she, however they were BOTH smokers. In short SHE BLATANTLY LIED, she was a senior member of the Audubon society and intimately involved with the bird counts and KNEW with CERTAINTY that bird numbers were BOOMING especially in the areas where DDT was being used, test mice fed DDT did get cancer but so did the control groups, NOT fed DDT, the cancer was caused by an aflatoxin contamination in the mouse feed. She left this information out of her book, and misrepresented the results of the studies she cited as evidence. Her book resulted in the banning of DDT and this resulted in the deaths of millions in the developing world from disease and hunger. I recommend you buy it then compare it to its critique The Lies of Rachel Carson by Dr J Gordon Edwards. As to polio all i can add is that the late 1950's Salk polo vaccine was contaminated with LIVE polio virus and a cocktail of monkey viruses including SV40 which causes soft tissue cancers in other mammals including humans, once inside a host this virus can be transferred to others via a mother. The NIH knew this because a researcher discovered that the Salk vaccine paralysed monkeys when injected in a routine QA check. She informed the NIH and was ignored and punished by being transferred the NIH went ahead with the rollout anyway and the vaccine gave THOUSANDS polio. If that sounds like a 2020 story, thats because some things never change.
And there shall be signs in the sun, and in the moon, and in the stars; and upon the earth distress of nations, with perplexity; the sea and the waves roaring. Luke 21:25
"The world has changed. I see it in the water. I feel it in the Earth. I smell it in the air. Much that once was is lost, For none now live who remember it." - J. R. R. Tolkien; The Lord of the Rings.
@Natural Sceptic Historical Evidence for the Son of God Jesus Christ and his Ressurection: Flavius Josephus 1st Century Historian - Testified of Jesus Christs Existance and Ressurection Tacitus, Roman Historian wrote between 115 - 117ad - Testified of Jesus Christ's Existence. Jewish Biblical Literature, Tanakh Period 70-200ad Sanhedrin 43a - Testified Jesus Christ Existed and Death.
@@briancarton1804 Place your faith on Jesus. Jesus died so that you can have everlasting life. Jesus is the way the truth and the life, no one gets to the Father but by him. Trust Jesus. Repent Have a good day.
Temperatures have always been increasing and changing since the last ice age. This is nothing new and had nothing to do with men. Stop with your nonsense.
That would mean they are rapidly rising all over the world, which they are not. If they were, all the politicians and wealthy people wouldn't be buying up all the ocean front property.
You need to look at the coastal parts of Florida where they are flooded more and more often , instead of quoting internet rubbish spouted by conspiracy theorists.
Nothing that hasn't been predicted for decades, but in the future, when it's 24 degrees on Christmas day some people will still say, remember that Christmas in 1920, we just got on with it etc etc etc 🙄
Except that ... sea levels were 130 meters lower 20,000 years ago than today, And we're stressing for 20cm in 120 years. Imagine if we had mass media back then, the paranoia we'd have. Switch off your TVs
The difference is that back then, there were not that many people living in places that will be below sea level even if it "just" rises by 20 cm. Besides, the AVERAGE sea level rise until 2050 - which is less than 30 years for people like you who struggle with maths - is 30 cm meaning there are many places where the sea level will rise much more than just 30 cm even within those 28 years. DO try to inform yourself before posting rubbish.
@@Madonnalitta1 How many humans could live there now, especially with rising sea waters? What is your suggestion how to deal with the rest? Will you kill all US, Canadian, Australian and European citizens because they contributed way more to climate change than all else combined and then let the rest cope with whatever is left of the planet then? Silly statements like yours just show you WANT to be ignorant, so why do you even post them?
All of these comments only address the issue of rising sea levels. But environmental change is more than that. Its rising temperatures, sea ice melting, extreme weather events (too much rain, not enough rain, high winds, super hot weather) glaciers melting, rivers and lakes drying up, places on the Earth becoming uninhabitable. One hot summer, one wet summer or whatever isnt the point and making stupid comments about it will he better if certain cities go under water is unhelpful. It is a genersl trend over the past few years that we should all be looking at and at all of these events. At what point will people start to believe that it is a problem...when the world just burns up completely??! At least acknowledge there is a problem...then we can try to solve it!
Fortunately, it's governments and big corporations that need to take this information seriously, not individual contrarians on the net who believe their own half arsed observations of remembering how hot it was when they were kids is a match for scientific study. Although greed comes into it when you're dealing with major organisations like governments, so they have a different motive for contradicting these studies.
The claims that 97 percent of scientists supported the global warming theory was exposed as a series of statistical frauds, as was the claim that the 4,000 scientists associated with the IPCC endorsed its report-those 4,000 hadn’t endorsed it, and most hadn’t even read it but had merely reviewed parts of the report and often disagreed with what they read. The claim that the “science was settled” on climate change never withstood scrutiny. Scientists around the world signed a series of petitions to dispute that claim. The 2008 Oregon Petition, spearheaded by a former president of the National Academy of Science and championed by Freeman Dyson, Albert Einstein’s successor at Princeton and one of the world’s most preeminent scientists, was signed by more than 31,000 scientists and experts who agreed that “the proposed limits on greenhouse gases would harm the environment, hinder the advance of science and technology, and damage the health and welfare of mankind. … Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth.” The fantastical claim that CO2 is a pollutant was cut out of whole cloth. The 2008 statement signed by those 31000 scientists included the following. “there is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gasses is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate” is as true today as it was then, and as it always has been. No scientist anywhere at any time has shown that manmade CO2 emissions-aka nature’s fertilizer-do any harm to anything Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador said the government will end the subsidies and stop issuing permits for new wind projects. Israel is also set to pull the plug on the country’s wind industry, its environmental protection minister arguing that wind provides a negligible contribution to the country’s power system “compared to the potential for harm to nature, which is high.” The reality was NEVER what propaganda videos like this one want you to believe it to be.
One model for sea level rise predicts that by 2100, sea levels will have risen by around 2 meters (6 feet); by 2150 up to 4 meters (13 feet). This might not seem too bad, but applied on a global scale this represents an enormous volume of water. Low lying areas will be inundated. Unfortunately this is only the beginning; there is enough ice in Antarctica to raise global sea levels in excess of 200 feet once it has all melted.
Except that Antarctica has been COOLING overall for 35 years !, last year was a year of RECORD cold. Antarctic land ice mass has been INCREASING for a very long time. By the way at current rates sea level will have risen by 117 mm by 2100, likewise that will be 192 mm by 2150 and THAT assumes NO cooling, and overall warming throughout that whole period. As there has been NO overall warming for most of the last 25 years that seems unlikely. Following the pattern of the last 8000 years our current warming is likely to be shorter than the Medieval warming of 300 years. Models are WORTHLESS as predictors and so they have proven, by their results so far, the ONLY accurate way to measure sea level rise is with stable tide gauges. By the way tell me WHAT Antarctic ice you are suggesting will melt ?
@@peterjones4180 I do not understand why you are so pro terrible air quality and why you are for breathing poisonous chemicals. Even if climate change is wrong it is surely a very good idea to not poison the air we all breathe, why are you arguing FOR terrible air quality when everyone benefits from having better air quality, my kids dont have to spend time indoors when there is a smog warning, they could play outside any day they like....HOW IS THAT A BAD THING? Who would be against having good air quality? Do you also like having pollution in YOUR drinking water as well, are you pro Phosphates and Lead in drinking water as well, or is it just so long as its not in YOUR drinking water peter, but you have no problem with others having to drink polluted water and breathe polluted air? Either you are okay with MY family breathing toxic chemicals because YOUR air is good, which pretty much makes you a selfish a55, or you are okay with it because it makes you money so you dont care....its money isnt it peter.
Thankfully it doesnt effect the rich so they can still fly private jets and buy hypercars that do 2 mile to the gallon
And have beech front condo,s
@Shep Raynham ur creating ur own so called vibe ur getting. Not what the guy insinuated at all
@Shep Raynham haven't heard that line before. Maybe that's what vincent meant although he built on the original comment and the original comment seems to be simply "the rich people aren't impacted and will continue to do what they want to while we have to do things in our own lives but they dont"
They are beyond evil especially the big oil companys, what happend in africa and middel east. We condenm russia what they are doing to the people in Ukraine, shell bp exxon what they did is just as bad, but they did it just for more profits.I am not saying Russia is good far far from it, But it shows the big companys can just get away what anything they do!
BP/Shell does not care if londen burns all the better for them if they can turn a profit from it.
@Shep Raynham hey shep. You're missing an e.. catch it eee.... sheep.
Instead of studying BBC, cnn, nytimes and "climatologists" etc you could study geological, astrophysical and biological data of the geologic ages of the the earth. Then maybe you could realize that the only thing that changed on earth is the access to information and most important the far reach of propaganda. The climate of the earth continues its cycles, small and large, THE SUN does also. There are 3 things man-made affecting the climate, metropolitan areas full of heat absorbing asphalt and cement that affect the local climate enormously and that's what 90% of the people feel as "climate change" (guess what.. they want even more people concentrated in the cities)... and.. the deforestation of the planet, the destruction of the earths lungs that exchange the co2 we produce by breathing with lifegiving oxygen. Those forests are destroyed by the same parasites that blame everything on everyday people.
Earth has a perfectly tuned biosphere, perfect to produce and support life, the more co2 you give the more plant life it produces and then more oxygen and food is produced to support more life. Lastly, planned obsolescence, who made all industry work by this model? Us? The consumers or the billioners that suddenly care about the environment? What if Apple, intel, Nvidia, samsung and all similar companies didn't produce a damn new device every year trying to make the previous obsolete and instead supported your old devices? Google cares so much that every new Android update makes all old devices obsolete and useless.. Industrial production of new devices in 6 month cycles is 1million times more harmful for the environment than all cars, stoves and aircons combined.
If they care why do they make it harder to use lng gas in my car when it actually produces a more complete combustion thus less harmful gases? Why they NEVER supported the use of motorcycles in the west as a much more efficient alternative to cars?
On the bright side, if sea-levels rise enough they may cover Coventry, Birmingham and Wolverhampton.
Oh well that’s not too bad then buddy.
take out the paedos
Funny enough they are some of the last to go under
@@adrianrouse5148 absolutely right, good luck to those on the coast.
When London floods we may allow to come in to the West Midlands if you ask nicely. Then again...
Another day. another bout of fear porn
Scientists say....🙄
The COP Conference 1 was 30 years ago. We have had 25 more COP conferences, and yet here we are, still addicted to fossil fuels. If we haven't done it in 30 years, can you really see us doing anything in the next decade, like we have to?
COP summits are proving to be little better than nice little get togethers for world leaders.
If the worst offenders can't even be bothered to show up, go home mid-way through, or chuck all their promises away within just a few days of the conference, then they are more or less pointless.
The big issue is the Climate Alarmist have created a massive division with their down right lies. For example we had XR telling us the Earth would end in 25 years. How can you take this seriously.
I just don’t believe a word of it now, the only thing we get from it is increased Green Taxes
Co2 has NEVER been a problem in the past when the levels were in the THOUSANDS of ppm, why do YOU think its a problem now ?
I think you really need to research the greenhouse properties of Co2.
Only the foolish will destroy their economies over the mythical Co2 problem.
China AND Russia CERTAINLY wont, they understand that its rubbish.
@@UkSapyy YES I HAVE!, i have been looking at this issue for more than 44 years since it was dangerous human induced global cooling, promoted by the same groups and some of the same scientists as dangerous human induced global warming now.
Back then they wanted to sprinkle carbon black on the poles to melt the ice TO SAVE THE PLANET, and wanted governments to build more coal fired power stations to pump as much Co2 into the atmosphere as possible TO SAVE THE PLANET.
I wager i probably know more about this issue than you do.
I speak to scientists face to face including those who have worked for the IPCC.
But seeing YOU think otherwise let see you complete this very simple quiz.
Q. At what atmospheric concentration of Co2 does it produce its greatest warming effect ?
Q. Does a doubling of the atmospheric concentration of Co2 produce more or less additional warming ?
Q. What percentage of the annual out gassing of Co2 into the atmosphere is from non human sources ?
Q.According to the AGW hypothesis which greenhouse gas is almost entirely responsible for the dangerous global warming feedback loop ?
Q.What volume of the atmosphere does Co2 represent ?
Q. Based on the paleoclimate data does atmospheric Co2 levels have very good or very poor correlation with the temperature cycles ?
Q. Based on the ice core data does rising atmospheric Co2 levels drive up temperature or does rising temperatures drive up atmospheric Co2 levels ?
Q.Do atmospheric Co2 concentrations COOL the atmosphere ?
Q.Based on the ice core data do higher atmospheric levels of Co2 prevent subsequent cooling ?
Q.Which is the most powerful and by far greatest volume of greenhouse gas in the atmosphere ?
Q.Based on the physics of Co2 should there have been more additional warming or less additional warming when atmospheric Co2 levels were 100 ppm lower than now ?
Q.Define climate and how it is measured ?
These should take you about five minutes to answer FROM MEMORY lets see what you know if anything.
so shall i stop mowing my grass and driving my little 1.8 ltr diesel car while millions of ltrs of jet fuel are burnt every day !
5mm a year? So it will take 60 years to rise a foot. Run to the hills!
Actually its around 1.5 mm pa, they are using dodgy satellite data or the mixed and averaged satellite data that greatly exaggerates the actual level of rise.
They do that here too our most accurate tide gauge shows sea levels falling in Sydney Harbor .
A lot of climate change scientists in the comments section today.
@@peterjones4180 Sea temperatures are rising - when you heat water it expands - there are a few areas where land is still rising eg Finland , after being compressed by ice in the past. So give us a link to the Sydney data.
@@auldfouter8661 As a matter of policy i never ASK for links and data and i NEVER give them, this is publicly available data you should have no problem finding it with research.
THAT is what I do.
To make it easier for you the gauge is at Fort Denison where the measured level of sea level rise is LESS than the rate of site subsidence.
You are correct some coastlines are rising some sinking internationally, and the satellite data has greatly exaggerated past sea level due to instrument problems acknowledged by NASA.
@@live_monkey2485 Some of the comments on this video make you pray they're just pretending to be idiots.
And they wonder why people don't watch the MSM anymore.
Remember, half of Norfolk and Canary Wharf, will be underwater by the year 2000
the Thames barrier stopped that
I'm not worried, i'm fishman and I have gills
All them islands that were due to dissappear under the waves in the Pacific and Indian ocean. Pretty sure everyone of them is still there.
I'm pretty sure some are now uninhabitable due to ever higher tides.
Most of them are GROWING in size.
Many are coral atolls, which are sunken/sinking volcanoes which have moved off the volcanic hot spot which bulges the crust upwards, topped with coral growth which forms the island, as the volcano continues to sink, the coral growth keeps up with the rate of sinking and forms the atoll from coral sand.
The inhabitants have chosen to live in a location that has always been doomed to eventually sink.
The same is true of Hawaii, the Emperor seamounts are the sunken remains of the original Hawaiian islands.
In the 1800s we had a cooling period, so showing a rising trend from there is not anything to write home about.
@@stevieg103 You are living in ignorance though.
@@auldfouter8661 NO Peter Langan UNDERSTANDS some of the past, YOU clearly do not.
You are correct , but then from around 1890 to the late 1930's we had warming, then from 1940 to 1977 we had COOLING again, from 1977 to 1998 we had warming, since then the cooling has equaled the warming.
@@peterjones4180 It certainly has not
@@auldfouter8661 I certainly has NOT WHAT ?
It's not broken. It's just going through changes. Nothing that humans can't adapt to.
So you can stop crying.
Flip-flops are quite normal here in Thailand. You Brits will just have to jolly well get used to wearing them.
Haha 😂 nice one buddy, I’m in Britain myself and what people need to realise is, we’re a just a tiny little island that can be swallowed up by the sea at anytime so I’ll pass on the flip flops Skajd my friend, take care of yourself buddy from Stevie boy in Britain.
It will be the wettest soggiest coldest summer next year. You watch.
What the UK average graph shows is a warming from around 7.8 C to around 9.3 C over 130 years. That's an elevation of 1.5 C compared with global temperature rises of 1.2 C, or an additional 0.3 C on top of global average temperature rise. That additional warming is even greater on continents and will have serious implications for food production. The 'fat tail' of weather extremes, like that that gives the 40 C temperature records, will give rise to even greater and more frequent severe weather events.
The more northern a country is so stronger the increase gets.
Utter rubbish !, get your facts RIGHT !, warming reduces the temperature difference between the poles and the equator this REDUCES extreme weather !
What graph ? we have had around .7 Deg C warming over the last 150 years.
@@peterjones4180
"Utter rubbish !, get your facts RIGHT !, warming reduces the temperature difference between the poles and the equator this REDUCES extreme weather !"
Warming increases severe weather events as there is more energy in the system.
Accelerated warming of the Arctic and Antarctic decreases the temperature difference between the polar and temperate regions causing increased sinusoidicity in the jet streams causing 'blocking' of cold regions further south and heat waves in the Arctic. Such blocking has caused severe cold in Texas which caused their grid to collapse while causing more heat waves on Greenland leading to record ice melts.
The same phenomenon has caused blocking over Europe and California leading to increased water stress, heat waves and forest fires.
The tropics are warming faster hence the bleaching of coral reefs and the warming of the Pacific and stronger El Nino and La Nina events.
Warming land is between 1.5 and 2.0 times greater than global average temperature rises and even greater in land on continental land masses which causes more droughts and heatwaves.
Increased global average temperature create more evaporation leading to more flooding and more heat energy creating stronger tornadoes.
Arctic temperatures are rising about 4 times faster than global average temperature rises.
How about you get your facts right.
"What graph ? we have had around .7 Deg C warming over the last 150 years."
The graph at 1:05 in the video from Met Office data shows a difference of 1.5 C over 130 years.
How about you learn to pay attention.
@@JugglinJellyTake01 The MET office graph IS WRONG !, they are public servants and BOUND to support government policy !
Its government policy to support the global warming narrative and so THEY DO !.
You see the same in the U.S with the change of government there has been a flurry of data removal from departmental websites and the now censored graphs have replaced them.
They CANNOT be trusted without checking the data, SAME here, the BOM has gone to extraordinary lengths to distort our temperature records and has REWRITTEN IT THREE TIMES !
You are incorrect the energy produced is lower, the winds that create severe storms ARE DRIVEN BY THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE POLES AND THE EQUATOR , warming poles produce a lower gradient and DECREASE the severity of storms, that is the official position of the worlds most experienced meteorologists, the physics are clear .
Much of the heat energy is sucked up from the surface and pumped out to space by cumulus and stratocumulus clouds as a gigantic heat pump.
The effects you ascribe to sinusoidicity in the jet streams causing 'blocking' of cold regions further south and heat waves in the Arctic are real but the system is far more complex than you state and NOT relevant to my statement.
I remind you that the mild warming we have had HAS NOT RESULTED IN AN INCREASING OF EITHER MORE FREQUENT OR MORE SEVERE WEATHER EVENTS !, what you have stated IS NOT HAPPENING.
Coral reefs bleach in response to colder temperatures, warmer temperatures , fresh water, no water.
There is NO apparent increase in GBR bleaching the reefs are doing fine, in fact the same species that bleach in warmer water here at times DO NOT bleach at significantly warmer temperatures further north in fact corals PREFER warmer water than on the GBR, its the various species of commensal zooxanthellae that cause the bleaching some species are adapted to cooler and some to warmer waters this is what allows coral to live in a wide range of temperatures, when temperatures cool below tolerance for that species the corals expel them and uptake other species from the water column, the same is true for warmer water where they expel the cooler tolerant species and uptake warmer adapted species.
We are NOT experiencing MORE droughts OR heatwaves, the work on drought has been done here and there is NO LINK between warming and drought, in fact overall its been trending a bit wetter here.
We are NOT experiencing more floods either.
A significant driver of increased rainfall is volcanic eruptions.
And tornadoes have been decreasing for a long time now, the same is true for wildfire in the U.S, which was MUCH greater in the 1920's.
I remind YOU the oceans are NOT heated by long wave IR radiation that only penetrates a um, the oceans are heated by SUNLIGHT THAT penetrates up to several hundred feet.
So ocean heating is the result of the amount of sunlight reaching the surface and the underlying temperature of the water mass, cloud cover has a large effect on this atmospheric temperature does not.
Theory says the POLES SHOULD rise faster than the equator SO WHAT !
Interestingly the Antarctic has been COOLING OVERALL for around 35 Years.
You need to go back and IGNORE what your government and the media says and look at the data, I HAVE , most of what YOU claim is happening IS NOT HAPPENING.
As for Greenland overall there is still lots more ice there than 1000 years ago, as to your brief bit of warm weather THAT IS WEATHER NOT CLIMATE , Greenland will soon go back to the COOLING it has been experiencing.
Climate alarmist statement, you do know the Earth was far hotter in the past, hence why we had those big reptiles walking around.
You have to define normal, not make up a random number.
80 years are not enough data.
That’s the big issue, setting a realistic baseline. After all we had giant reptiles walking the planet at one time so we know the temperature was far higher then.
I think the Jerry mations account has Dunning-Kruger pole poistion:
"Went to Blackpool in 1975 when I was 9. Sea is still exactly the same level there today."
D'uh with a capital "W".
I went to Blackpool yesterday and you couldn't see the beach. This global warming thing is real.
@@SA-ff9uc Yes its real so is global cooling and climate change, and the solar orbit and rain and clouds, and tides etc, SO WHAT !
MR my best buddy, where have you been? Well I didn’t take your advice on the fake vaccine and have avoided covid.
What words of wisdom are you saying today?
Best part of this video was the brief inclusion of Boaty McBoatface.
@3:16
When we are living on hilltops our GM children will ask..."Daddy, what's a boatface"? And we will laugh at the pointlessness of it all.
@@spencerkay6131 THAT is NOT likely to happen before the onset of the next glacial and another 100000 years of bitter cold and ice sheets covering much of the earth, with sea levels one again 130 meters lower than now.
Sea level rise of 1.5 mm pa will take an enormous time to cover hills.
@@peterjones4180 wrong
@@dougaltolan3017 Wrong WHAT ?
If you disagree with whatever post you are referring to, then justify your perspective with FACTS.
First clip of houses burning was caused by an electrical.faultbin a shed
Let's not let that get in the way of a great narrative though.
All over Europe fires are starting due to Climate Change.
Ok it’s actually a nutter with a lighter 😂
There is definitely a trend of increasing temperatures and it simply does not matter if it is manmade or not. Higher temperatures make life for humans harder or even impossible depending on the area where someone lives. Therefore, we need to do whatever we can to keep temperatures as close to where they are now as we can. Those who deny that it is man made forget that it affects us no matter whether it is man made or something that would happen anyway. It needs to be kept in check as best we can.
But the sun will grow to consume earth in 500 million years anyways so…
Ofc its a joke
Yep. When I was younger in Lincolnshire, UK family friend's would come over and we had a snowball fight on that week. Now I don't see enough snow in a year to throw a snow ball. Vs a random week.
Actually there has been NO overall warming for most of the last 25 years.
Warming humans can handle , COOLING kills in large numbers.
It should NOT be necessary to remind you that the two previous interglacials were much warmer than ours has ever been, AND that the peak warmings have been getting SHORTER and COOLER over the last 8000 years, starting at the warmest, the Holocene warmings 8000 and 6000 years ago then the Minoan 3000 years ago then the Roman 2000 years ago and the Medieval 1000 years ago these were ALL warmer than our current warming.
Co2 IS NOT and never has been a major forcing on temperature, the paleoclimate and ice core data makes that quite clear.
So how do YOU plan to alter the suns orbit, control its variable energy output, its magnetic storms and solar wind, cosmic rays AND high altitude clouds, the oceans currents and cycles this i would love to hear.
@@peterjones4180 "Actually there has been NO overall warming for most of the last 25 years." Your evidence for that? Please remember, gut feelings do NOT count. Please specify exactly which data you used to come to this conclusion. If you cannot provide that, we know what to think of your ramblings.
Rising temperatures ended the last ice age...it's a normal weather cycle. Just a few thousand years ago, the Sahara desert was all green and covered with grass. If you think the climate change is your fault and that you can change the natural cycle of the earth's climate... good luck, but the reality is that the last ice age ended not too long ago, and the rising temperatures will continue regardless of humans. It's just a normal weather cycle.
Water expands when warmed. It's not just melting ice that makes sea levels rise.
Maybe even the moon
Well the Arctic ice cap, the Greenland and Antarctic pack ice and ice shelves already displace their full volume of water so if they were to melt there would be NO increase in sea level from that.
Whats warms ocean water, the SHORT wave radiation from sunlight that penetrates hundreds of feet, re radiated long wave IR from greenhouse gases only penetrates a few Um into the oceans and has almost no effect, and most of that is coming from water vapor.
The ICE age was man made, honest. Grab your life jackets and place them covering your television, the severity of fear will be diminished and you can go enjoy the weather, what ever that might be. Unfortunately house fires have been a thing since houses but we will show you one anyway, and make out it’s your fault for being born, unless you smother your tv in a global warming life jacket. Stay safe, enjoy the weather, don’t let them take your happiness 😎🛟
Relying on public memories is great
Each according to his memory capacity.
Lol.
Record-keeping is vital: objective, consistently methodical taking of measurements allows us to extend our knowledge back further than the memories of those very old folk who have still got good recall, and tree-ring studies, ice and soil cores etc provide further corroboration when records & memories & diaries and folk oral history via myths and legends are compared.
We are now in the grips of widespread climate breakdown
You sound like you’re lots of fun!
@@belkentens You must be smart!
@@tesstoby
You must be very angry and scared
Is it because you miss the crusties and New Age travellers?
just the beginning
@@belkentens This is what happens when you comment on UA-cam, anyone can reply :)
It's ok the raised water will make water more accessible to fire fighters.
I know this is serious but that boat @2:25 LOLOLOL Boaty McBoat Face LOLOLOL we all know they had a naming contest and this was the winner!
When I look at travel programmes in uk I see small coastal towns on estuaries that have not altered in terms of sea levels for hundreds of years. Also major tide gauges do not show any rise in increased sea levels in the past 100 years
"Scientists are wrong because I've seen a travel program"
Unfortunately the science is extremely distorted, anyone with a brain knows the temperatures in the past were far higher, hence why we had giant reptiles walking the Earth.
Sea levels do vary by a vast amount but these are largely due to the gravitational pull from moon and occasionally from other planets.
The climate alarmist just love a drama.
You think you could detect a 3mm rise by watching a travel programme. I hope you're either just trolling or satirising the stupidity of other commenters making similar claims.
Those scientists needn't have bothered with all their education. You've got it all figured out.
Utter BS! Research the milankovitch cycle's
How can UK sea level rise if it doesnt rise elsewhere?
Because the circumference of the coastline coupled with the diameter of the starfish that are aligned with the sun as it passes through the solar system on it's way to the Andromeda galaxy via the pull of the super massive black hole which was caused when the big bang started and reduces the influx of illegal immigrants into this country which is why neither Rishi Sunak or Liz Truss should become PM. 🤓👍
Because there are 7 different seas in the world you spastic
BS...
Total BS.
You need to go much further back than the 1880”s to see what’s going on, every 6000 years there’s a sharp rise and fall in temperature, guess what we are due this right now, yes C02 levels doesn’t help but it’s not the whole story!!..🤔🤔🤔😳😳😳
You're so close to understanding. Yes, the climate changes over massive, massive periods of time. But now, it's changing incredibly rapidly, over only a few human generations, because of human actions. And it will change too rapidly for our ecosystems, crops and cities to manage
@@nicci24 this is a channel worth following
ua-cam.com/video/rmob1nuA8ZY/v-deo.html
@@nicci24 NO !, its NOT changing rapidly !, the data shows that clearly , YOU are being told its changing rapidly BUT IT IS NOT.
The warming we had post 1977 is similar to ALL the previous warnings measured since we have had thermometers .
The highest number of broken high temperature records in the U.S was in the 1930's , MOST still stand, that also goes for the longest periods of hot weather.
Where is the sea level rise info from, it cant be confined to UK can it. Utter nonsense. Everything is always a CRYSIS in Uk . Just seems like another below par summer to me.
Well in fact they are rising at a TINY rate, with NO sign of acceleration.
It is complex because not only do sea levels rise but so do coastlines, some of which also fall, and then you have the problem of reclaimed land subsiding, or land subsiding because fresh water is being pumped out of it .
Currently the most accurate tool we have for measuring sea levels are stable long term tide gauge records.
Some of those records show FALLING sea levels , Sydney Harbor Fort Denison is a case in point, where the subsidence is MORE than the nominal rise.
Tide gauge data shows an overall rise rate of around 1.5 mm PA.
At the end of the last ice age sea levels rose around 130 Meters, then around 4500 years ago there was a substantial DROP , we are currently STILL 1-2 meters lower than then, and seas have been rising slowly and intermittently ever since.
There is a problem with the satellite sea level data, NASA acknowledged this years ago, the instrumentation greatly exaggerated the amount of sea level rise over a long period.
So as i said the only accurate data we have is from the tide gauges, HOWEVER some scientists committed to the global warming panic PREFER to use the satellite data BECAUSE it exaggerates the rate of rise, others of that view MIX the tide gauge data with the exaggerated satellite data and then AVERAGE it which also increases the observed rate of rise.
This is a very unscientific approach but this sort of thing has become common over the last few decades.
So yes sea levels are rising overall but the amount of perceived rise depends on where you are.
Most media coverage of the issue is simply propaganda, if the Arctic ice, and the Greenland coastal ice shelves , AND the Antarctic pack ice and ice shelves ALL melted tomorrow that would raise world sea levels by ........ZERO MILLIMETERS !.
That is because they already displace their full volume of water.
Hope that helps
@@peterjones4180 interesting. Thank you.
I am living next to the sea for past 79 years in Sri Sri Lanka. The sea has not risen an inch in that time. How come it rises where you are. I think you need to check your measurements or your brain. I will opt for the latter.
Are you a geologist or meteorologist?
Oh Jesus 79 years. I'm just gonna ignore you grandpa
Enjoy your bankruptcy - both financial and intellectual.
Ignoring the truth ,that’s about right
So... having just wasted half an hour of my life researching the Sri Lankan Government's climate resources, I discover that, while you are mostly completely wrong, you are nevertheless correct in one vital respect - sea level rise for Sri Lanka is not reported using the Imperial measurement of the 'inch'.
At least the grass wont get on fire again if it's underwater.
At least a rising tide lifts all ships
Albeit extremely slowly.
they have warned us for 20 years i just noticed now
They warned us for 20 years about WHAT ?
What us it you just noticed.
"Some scientists have expressed concern"..."If the system does collapse..." Very careful wording there, C4, about what I'd expect.
Yep when you listen its always, IF, PERHAPS,POSSIBLY.
Try and find a replicated peer reviewed published scientific paper that says HUMAN EMISSIONS OF Co2 are CAUSING DANGEROUS GLOBAL WARMING.
You wont find one.
The first two IPCC scientific reports made the finding that we currently have no credible data that demonstrates human emissions of Co2 are causing dangerous global warming, so the IPCC bureaucracy arranged to have that finding on the second report REVERSED to match the advice for policymakers report.
Neil nothing is going to collapse, you are being manipulated by clever people using propaganda.
Temperatures have always varied, you don’t go panicking because you have a few weeks of amazing weather wasted by a few arsonist.
You should be more concerned by who is behind the coordinated arson attacks and whose message is now being propagated because of this.
@@peterjones4180 its becomes they know it has nothing to do with us humans it is more likely far bigger than man made and is a galaxy ruling event that comes around approximately every 3000 years.
@@joecarty8579 its not just a few weeks ,,it is a temperature spike one day its about 17/22 next day its 37/42 and 24 hours later its back to 17/22 that is not a natural summer event.
C Buxton, of course it’s normal, if you have an overcast sky during the day and clear at night then temperatures will drop, if on the other hand you have a few days of clear skies then temperatures will rise.
There’s no point in alarming people when we get a few weeks of great weather.
If you look carefully at the stats more people die in the cold winters up here and with the price of fuel we need a few months without the heating on.
You could argue that this year hundreds will die due to Green taxes on their fuel when old people can’t afford to switch on the heating.
Uk electricity bill is apx 50% Green and Gov tax.
Strange how it's only UK sea level rising dint relise our seas wasn't connected to the others
They never said it's only the UK though. They're just making a report for UK TV viewers so telling them how the global rise in sea levels affects their coast specifically.
@@simonsimon325 the sooner they rise the better
Since about 2019 higher than normal water levels in the Great lakes caused massive wave damage. Many century old Victorian cottages were swept into the lakes.
Thankfully the water levels have decreased although the damage can't be undone.
Best luck UK. I hope Mother Nature behaves herself.
Lakes….
im just glad most the world, doesnt believe this nonsense
They claim “UK sea level is rising by 3mm to 5mm” whilst showing scary film of ferocious waves thousands of millimetres high, smashing against the coast. They are certainly being alarmist.
I’ve been going to the same UK beaches for 50 years, but the tide now still comes up to the same place on the beach that it did 50 years ago! That’s not really a sea level rise is it?
I don't think you get it. These small incremental rises will amplify the impact and damage of any storm hitting the coast. These storms will only increase in frequency and ferocity, and sea level rise will continue. Over time, the upper tide line will rise, but whole communities and coastal land will be washed away by flooding long before that matters.
You do not seem to understand about storms, spring tides and extreme events. You do not understand trends. You show no awareness of the melting of the polar ice caps and the effect of continued ocean heating. Maybe give your shipbuilding a rest while you learn about what perils you’ll be in, on the sea.
@@nolongerlistless I agree that climate change is happening. I did not deny that climate change is happening. My point was that the news media are often alarmist, they like to exaggerate (probably because that’s how they make their money).
Specifically, in this Channel 4 News article, as I said above, they stated that “the UK sea level rose by 3 to 5mm”, but at the same time they showed dramatic scary footage of waves thousands of millimetres high, smashing into the coast. They were telling a lie. If they wanted to be truthful, they should show some sea which is only 3 to 5mm higher. But of course, that would not sell their news stories, would it?
@@noahtheshipbuilder1778 You believe that destructive crashing waves are not part of the news story, so you want to censor out the extremes that accompany an apparently moderate ‘average’ overall increase?
@@noahtheshipbuilder1778 Listen carefully from 2:00 to 2:15... the reporter is talking about a doubling of the annual rate of sea level rise in the context of four centuries of accelerating anthropogenic global warming - a warming that produces more storms which already happen more frequently and more intensely - so that footage of a coast in a storm is from now. It is neither irrelevant nor fraudulent. It is a reminder that the sea is not a millpond but has waves and currents and ocean /sea /coastal conditions respond to and interact with the jet stream conditions in the upper atmosphere, the story that opened the news piece. If you’re saying that this excerpt is misleadingly named because it only mentions sea level rise then I agree with you. Actually it is about acceleration and tipping points that make disasters in the human world inevitable unless we act. It is as if you are complaining that because in the latest second of the latest minute out of the last 5 mins of its advance from a distance the lorry hurtling towards you, driven by a distracted driver, was only going 1m per millisecond faster than in the previous second there is no reason to take action or take cover or warn others who may still survive. Get it? You need to look at the entire piece, not focus on a single quibble with a single symptom in a vast syndrome! “Oh! I’ve got jaundice but I’m only one shade of very pale primrose more Simpson like than I was at the beginning of the cancer diagnosis I was given! The doctors are being alarmist!”
What about he great fire of London? Was that climate change aswell?
so how did the ice age end 12,000 years ago - too many SUVs?
Roughly 20,000 years ago the great ice sheets that buried much of Asia, Europe and North America stopped their creeping advance. Within a few hundred years sea levels in some places had risen by as much as 10 meters-more than if the ice sheet that still covers Greenland were to melt today. This freshwater flood filled the North Atlantic and also shut down the ocean currents that conveyed warmer water from equatorial regions northward. The equatorial heat warmed the precincts of Antarctica in the Southern Hemisphere instead, shrinking the fringing sea ice and changing the circumpolar winds. As a result-and for reasons that remain unexplained-the waters of the Southern Ocean may have begun to release carbon dioxide, enough to raise concentrations in the atmosphere by more than 100 parts per million over millennia-roughly equivalent to the rise in the last 200 years. That CO2 then warmed the globe, melting back the continental ice sheets and ushering in the current climate that enabled humanity to thrive.
So you wanna bet on some miracle event will intervene to save UK?
Hahaaaa we’ll said mate
@@cookiecola5852 who cares anyway?
Nailed it. You see that big ball of fire in the sky, Greta?!
I know let’s not do anything about it. Let’s concentrate on blaming meghan markle, the EU and of course trans people.
Don’t forget Putin.
A few weeks ago the nuclear powered ice breaker was deployed to the artic to rescue some oil tankers stuck in thick ice. In July! It is getting colder at the Arctic. You won't hear that in the media.
Exactly because they need an agenda for Green Taxes
Whenever there’s a fire it gets media coverage and count how many times you hear “Climate change” “Man made” bla bla bla.
There are sometimes periods of the year that the ice caps are abnormally cold. That does not mean anything of the annual net change in ice levels is negative, which it has been every year for the last 20, with the exception of 2017 in Antarctica.
@@PsilentMusicUK it is impossible for us to know. I don't trust any of the figures because there is a concerted effort to push a narrative and that narrative is not allowed to be challenged. It is anti science. However, when ships need rescuing in July from Arctic ice and you can verify the ice breaker's location then you know it is a true story. The narrative is that it has all melted and may never come back. The truth is the complete opposite. It is clear that sea levels are completely unchanged over the last 40 years. I can verify it by going to the coast. It is my experience. Old buildings right on the coast are unaffected by any imagined sea level rise. So the truth is that nothing has changed or is changing, we are just being brainwashed with huge lies on a daily basis. Geo engineering is also being used to control the weather to support the narrative. They particularly like to flood one certain area in Australia, allegedly to depopulate it. The air force got caught cloud seeding it to the point where it even got on the news. It is all watermelon communists. Green on the outside, red on the inside. The WEF is the control hub of it all. They have penetrated all the governments with their people. Look at what they are doing to Holland now! Trying to steal farm land and reduce food. Ireland the same.Canada next to have the Sri Lankan experience. Kill the cattle. It is like pol pot, stalin and Mao etc. They all end up destroying civilisation and murdering millions of people for some crazy idea. It is happening now but world wide, based on crazed ideas of climate catastrophe. If we don't call it out and stand up to it then billions will die unnecessarily. Controlling billions of people requires an excuse and what better than a cataclysmic climate hoax that threatens us all? If you ignore the media and look at the climate then what has changed? Nothing at all. Our individual experiences of decades of existence says it is unchanged so why believe numbers on a spreadsheet from corrupted "scientists" trying to convince us otherwise? They are just debt slaves who must do as they are told or lose their jobs and futures. Very easy to control. As are the media. 1976 had something like 20 days consecutively over 30 degrees C in the UK. If we are warming up the climate so fast then why have we not even got back to 1976 levels of heatwave? Not even 10 days in a row over 30 has occurred since. 2 days near 40 and then back to 20 does not compare. Indeed, why has it changed form global warming to climate change? There is no warming. Weather control technology can then be used and blamed on climate change to confuse the masses. Climate change is a meaningless term. It can mean anything to anyone. It can mean getting colder or hotter, wetter or drier and is based solely on your own experience which is actually the localised weather! Localised weather is controllable these days. You can literally buy the services online. Companies boast about it. Chinese Olympics used it. Middle East uses it. The whole climate change narrative is an evil scam, a crime against humanity.
Do a bit research. The sea ice levels are getting thinner. We have not had an artic free summer yet. When that happens the ocean currents will change. Perhaps bringing extreme winters to the UK.
This doesn't stop the rich from buying seafront property around the world... Someone must be lying 🤡
I believe the tipping point has been crossed- we need to wake up
Wake up and do what Brian, what do you suggest we do.
@@mrfugazi6713 were all gonna die. gonna die die die die. were gonna be dead soon
@@mrfugazi6713 - Start reducing your emissions foot print on everything you do and if the 7.96 billion did the same thing and starting adapting to a warming planet, this will reduce temperature increases over a period of time.
@@chrismckellar9350 Complete bullshit !
Co2 is NOT and never has been a primary forcing on temperature the paleoclimate data and ice core data make that VERY clear.
How then do YOU imagine doing any of these things will make the slightest difference to temperature.
@@peterjones4180 - All toxic emissions that includes methane, CO2 and NO2.
THE OCEAN IS BURNING
Alarmist nonsense,only the feeble minded are bothered
Climate Alarmist = Green Taxes
Why are they still building / buying beach front property?
Some of us are bigger fans of Milankovic's Cycle than CO2. In fact it's water vapour that's the biggest greenhouse gas. Without it we wouldn't be here.
There's never a shortage of gomerals.
@@auldfouter8661 Leonard Gibney is FACTUALLY correct.
Some of us are bigger fans of Milankovic's Cycle than CO2. In fact it's water vapor that's the biggest greenhouse gas. Without it we wouldn't be here.
What people need to realize about water vapor is that it goes up as green house gases increase. As CO2 and CH4 concentrations have increased the average global temperature has warmed heat waves become more frequent and the warmer the temperature the higher humidity. Thus the warmer it feels.
@@michaeldeierhoi4096 NO !, WARMING temperatures have INCREASED Co2 and Ch4 levels over the last 300 years, humans are adding a TINY amount of Co2 annually, to the naturally increasing Co2 levels, natural Co2 emissions into the atmosphere are at least 96.25% of the annual Co2 emissions and ALL Co2 molecules are re absorbed at the SAME RATE !.
You are correct about humidity however there is no data indicating ts gettng more humid overall, the atmosphere is constructed from various layers and you are thinking about only the lowest one.
Heat waves are LESS frequent now than in the 1930's !
@@peterjones4180 Think what you like, however I prefer to follow the empirical data collected by researchers across the globe who recognize that humans are adding CO2 to the atmosphere at a record level. 36 BILLION tonnes of CO2 in 2021!! Even though that is a relatively small amount added every year that CO2 has increased by 50 % since the beginning of the industrial age. . That increase in CO2 retains more heat resulting in more heat waves and floods globally.
It’s not what we should do it’s what we shouldn’t do
So sad 😭😭😭 and I read comments for a living 💯🙄
We can all fix this problem by driving around 2 tonne electric cars :)
A 2 tonne electric car to transport a human of 80kg is the way forward. Very efficient :)
No they just have not told you yet that electric cars wont be a problem in the future because once the great reset is complete and Agenda 2030 implemented ONLY THE ELITES WILL BE ALLOWED TO HAVE CARS.
The rest of us will walk, ride bikes or take public transport, that is the plan they are implementing.
Have you read your copy of Agenda 2030 from the U.N yet ?
If you wish to see your future buy a copy of Limits to Growth p 1972 by The Club of Rome they are the main group behind all of this, thats where all the policy's have come from they set up the UNEP AND the IPCC and are the IPCC's primary advisors on environmental issues.
WHO are the COR ?, well they are a group of millionaires, billionaires, and former U.N bureaucrats
including the owners of Standard Oil the Rockefellers set up in 1968 to take control of the environmental
movement by huge funding from their associated tax free foundations, and use it for their financial advantage and to implement their geopolitical agenda.
They are closely associated with the World Economic Forum.
No, because electric cars need more minerals than gasoil cars to be produced. that plus the production it's to much
Nonsense! The temperature reading of 40c was taken at Heathrow airport. With concrete, tarmac and jet engines. Sea level rises? Where? That was said 30 years ago and nothing.
We’re doomed with that attitude
Yeah, everything is fine in Tuvalu. Tides are caused by God & are the same everywhere. 49° in Lytton is normal.
Nigel be smart! Nigel know Science!
Actually it was in Lincolnshire, but facts are optional I guess
😂 speaking we must’ve
Don’t forget lol 😂 😷💊then think 🧐
And I was thinking he was going to tell us about the U.K. was in the high 40s degrees In 1805 🤣🤣🤣
You actually believe that record ?
With the Mets track record of deceit.
And how astonishing 1816 miraculously was "The Year Without Summer" due to the Tambora eruption the year prior.
I hope you're joking.
The fearmongering is relentless isn’t it
Two days of slightly hotter than normal weather. Mass hysteria.
Not fear mongering - just a bit of objective reality to get your head around.
So is the deniability.
@@UKGeezer
Ooooh
@@catparka7698
Objective reality...
From channel 4 news... 😂
Showing pictures of coastal erosion at the end fools nobody.
Oh you are so clever, repeating oil company propaganda convinced you did your own research
@@julianshepherd2038 Huh? I’ve not done any research per say, nor am I aware of what your referring to about oil companies. But I do know what coastal erosion is.
And some man made arsons..
The dry ground too right?
Scaremongering rubbish.
it is not end of the world is it? it is just end of uk 🙄 according to monkeypox uk media 😂
Given out rain first week in August when I got camping lol
Sea level is global. If you're concerned about UK, then state: "the UK is sinking".
Diversity seems really heavy lately.
It sounds daft, but sea level isn’t the same across the globe.
@@DJB2 Same as tides differ. They even differ dramatically in the UK. Spring tide in Poole, about 7', and about 45' near Bristol.
Sea level varies significantly around the globe, and not merely as a function of tides - think temperature and density and salinity.
Fun fact: Guff is a Russian troll and works for a state that wants you to use its hydrocarboins!
Where I live the beach has become marsh land in the last 15 years because the water no longer comes up!
Eh? Marshy equals wetter than beach deposits, surely? I’d need more info to get your ‘drift’, wooden tie?
Gotta love the genuine puddles denying this in the comments. You’re all a complete tragedy.
Just think logically. If the 'climate' did what you wanted it to do the earth would be 9, 000 degrees C. Every day the earth heats up around the middle of the day. It doesn't carry on just getting hotter does it?
Clearly YOU have no understanding of the issue.
Temperature , weather and climate are ALL within NORMAL long term variability, nothing unusual is going on.
I think they have zero understanding of what the word average means
So what do suggest then Batman
We all want a cleaner climate. But the world has gone through this many times how different is this to the last time. Nobody knows. But carbon deposits in the ice cores show higher levels of carbon in earlier events. Volcanoes. Forrest fires. Who knows??
Chanel 4 needs to talk about Ecosia they are a search engine that plants trees
I am starting to root for climate change. Hopefully evolution does not make the same mistake twice.
Do you really hate yourself this much?
I actually believe its the why we haven't seen life anywhere else in the universe. Intelligence comes with greed, greed kills us off
@@KeithRingo Stupidity kills us off, see the IGNOBEL AWARDS,.....come to think of it why are you still alive ?
Climate Change is just a word that they use to panic you, in the past we called it an amazing summer.
@@joecarty8579 That is a very good appreciation of the issue.
How much oil is used per year globally?
36.4 billion barrels
Annually, global consumption is even more impressive, reaching 36.4 billion barrels consumed in 2018, according to BP. That's $2.184 trillion worth of oil consumption in a single year. In gallons, the world's annual consumption is 1.134 trillion-roughly half the amount of water found in Lake Michigan. Not to mention coal & other fossil fuels even wild fires deforestation all add up to the overwhelming climate change problem!!! God help us all!
I think God gave up on us a long time ago, and who can blame him/her
Yes, and all that fossil fuel adds up to about 0.5 ZJ (zettajoules) of energy per year. The excess heat in the system is over 220 ZJ. Equivalent to 400 years of fossil fuel consumption at the current rate.
Even if we somehow stopped using fossil fuels and removed about a trillion tonnes of CO2 (around 650 cubic km of dry ice equivalent) we would still have a huge amount of heat in the system.
1 ZJ is roughly equivalent of heating the Baltic Sea by about 1 Celsius. We have enough excess energy in the system to bring the Baltic Sea to the boil around 2 1/2 times.
~93% of that heat has gone into the oceans but as the oceans warm the solubility of gasses decreases which means a load of CO2 is dumped in the atmosphere further accelerating atmospheric warming.
Last week Antarctica was 5.1 below average governments our not telling the truth .
...governments our...???
It's about TRENDS. Don;t be a chump unless you want Russians to shyt in yer mouth.
Global warming makes the extreme poles cooler.
Yep Antarctica has been cooling overall for 35 years, last year was one of record cold.
@@peterjones4180 Sadly, the water underneath Antarctica’s ice shelves is connected to the global oceans which are heating rapidly, and so the ice is rapidly melting from below, whatever your air temperature readings (please indicate a source for these) might say.
That's the tide coming in then ... And then it goes out again.... Does it everyday....but if it gets hot enough then the extra sea water will evaporate and make rain somewhere and cure the drought... Its win win!
Twice!
Gosh , how long were you at the school to have learned so much?
@@auldfouter8661 school?
If the heat caused that house fire then why were the other houses not also on fire? Is that a valid question? 🤔
That's insane! Think you need to go back to school
Those other houses have been recycling their plastics.
@@moonch15 Whats insane? A question?
@@moonch15 You should see my other comment 😆
Yes it's insane to even question it
Why can’t we pick a large area of disused continent near the ocean and build a large supported pipe line miles into the sky out the atmosphere and pump sea water out into space levelling the seas and keeping up with glacier melt, yes it don’t change climate rise but will curb sea level rise, I know it’s a bit mad max but in concept it works
We are now in the midst of government being laughed at
Laughed at what , they’ve always been laughed at has far as I’m concerned.
Sea levels are rising due to the large ships being put to sea every year it's called water displacement
I bet Barack Obama is regretting spending $40 million on that beach front property, and all those other billionaires, Brad Pitt etc who have bought similar places, let’s hope they can sue however done the searches for them.
Probably cheaper to have the house moved.
THEY know the truth !, they are NOT the least bit concerned.
Must be a slow news day...
Living in Dartmouth - sea level is rising? Why not here?
If sea levels rising how come my shore lines been the same level for over 100 years? Or did they raise the old rotten piers n stairs as it got higher 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
We are just a tiny little island that can be swallowed up by the sea at any given time wether it’s man made or not.
What island ?
What about the affect of the moon wobble
What about it?
this is the answer move to the moon lol
if you zoom out a bit further, you will see temp fluctuate a lot even before the beginning of mankind
Ill have less far to walk to the beach then
Its a shame that when reporting climate change satellite heat images are not shown. When comparing a series of them over past years it becomes absolutely obvious that we have global warming when you see previously blue areas now turned to red! So why are these images rarely shown to the public? Showing a graph really doesn't have the same impact.
You do realize those are FALSE color images dont you ?
Since you bring up the satellite data i must remind you that for most of the last 25 years we have had no overall warming and THAT includes the last 6-7 years, THAT is what the satellite data tells us.
@Daan Daan Well i have an advantage i lived through the fake DDT scare, the fake acid rain scare, the fake ozone hole scare,
the fake global cooling scare and now the global warming scare.
All these issues can be traced back to the same groups, and they use the same methodology time after time.
They take a real thing, exaggerate it , ignore inconvenient scientific studies that demonstrate the scare is probably wrong,, use their great wealth to conduct massive international marketing campaigns and to suborn academics and university's to produce studies supporting their project.
@Daan Daan Well they have been exposed to a MASSIVE , stupendously well funded internationally coordinated marketing campaign .
They are not scientific thinkers not fundamentally skeptical, and when enough media outlets keep telling them the same propaganda for decades they just accept it.
Accurate studies that show problems with the propaganda are deliberately censored in the media.
They are simply using the same techniques ALL socialist dictatorships use.
We have a copy of the marketing campaign commissioned and designed for the U.K government long ago to SELL global warming to the public.
Amongst its recommendations is that they should IGNORE any information not in line with their
goals, that is why all scientific studies which demonstrate problems with their policys in this regard are simply IGNORED, science DOES NOT MATTER TO THEM, they dont care if the AGW hypothesis is correct or not in fact its just a means to justify the imposition of pre determined policy's agreed to at the Rio Earth Conference in 1992 and signed off on by our governments WITHOUT OUR AGREEMENT.
@Daan Daan Well i have no opinion on that, BUT i do know that the DDT scare was a confected
lie in regard to killing off birds.
Marine biologist Rachel Carson wrote Silent Spring in the late 1950's which SHE claimed she had scientific evidence that DDT was killing off birds and so we had to ban it, AND she claimed evidence of it causing cancer, her husband died of cancer and so did she, however they were BOTH smokers.
In short SHE BLATANTLY LIED, she was a senior member of the Audubon society and intimately involved with the bird counts and KNEW with CERTAINTY that bird numbers were BOOMING especially in the areas where DDT was being used, test mice fed DDT did get cancer but so did the control groups, NOT fed DDT, the cancer was caused by an aflatoxin contamination in the mouse feed.
She left this information out of her book, and misrepresented the results of the studies she cited as evidence.
Her book resulted in the banning of DDT and this resulted in the deaths of millions in the developing world from disease and hunger.
I recommend you buy it then compare it to its critique The Lies of Rachel Carson by Dr J Gordon Edwards.
As to polio all i can add is that the late 1950's Salk polo vaccine was contaminated with LIVE polio virus and a cocktail of monkey viruses including SV40 which causes soft tissue cancers in other mammals including humans, once inside a host this virus can be transferred to others via a mother.
The NIH knew this because a researcher discovered that the Salk vaccine paralysed monkeys when injected in a routine QA check.
She informed the NIH and was ignored and punished by being transferred the NIH went ahead with the rollout anyway and the vaccine gave THOUSANDS polio.
If that sounds like a 2020 story, thats because some things never change.
What happened to Peter?
Off dicking around?
Sounded like I was watching the day after tomorrow
And there shall be signs in the sun, and in the moon, and in the stars; and upon the earth distress of nations, with perplexity; the sea and the waves roaring. Luke 21:25
Someone talking sense for a change.
What is your point?
"The world has changed. I see it in the water. I feel it in the Earth. I smell it in the air. Much that once was is lost, For none now live who remember it." - J. R. R. Tolkien; The Lord of the Rings.
@Natural Sceptic Historical Evidence for the Son of God Jesus Christ and his Ressurection:
Flavius Josephus 1st Century Historian - Testified of Jesus Christs Existance and Ressurection
Tacitus, Roman Historian wrote between 115 - 117ad - Testified of Jesus Christ's Existence.
Jewish Biblical Literature, Tanakh Period 70-200ad Sanhedrin 43a - Testified Jesus Christ Existed and Death.
@@briancarton1804 Place your faith on Jesus. Jesus died so that you can have everlasting life. Jesus is the way the truth and the life, no one gets to the Father but by him. Trust Jesus. Repent
Have a good day.
Good, bring it on
Temperatures have always been increasing and changing since the last ice age. This is nothing new and had nothing to do with men. Stop with your nonsense.
"Boaty McBoatface" ......fucking classic. The lesson? Don't ask Internet polls to name your current thing
More project fear nonsense
Let nature take it's course.
The whole point is it isn't nature , it's man 's interference.
That would mean they are rapidly rising all over the world, which they are not. If they were, all the politicians and wealthy people wouldn't be buying up all the ocean front property.
You need to look at the coastal parts of Florida where they are flooded more and more often , instead of quoting internet rubbish spouted by conspiracy theorists.
40C really? On summer...
Imagine if the sea levels were declining, they would be freaking out in the exact same way.
Sydneys sea level IS declining.
They could easily desalinate some of the extra water and divert it to the desert
Glad i live in the Cotswolds.
Nothing that hasn't been predicted for decades, but in the future, when it's 24 degrees on Christmas day some people will still say, remember that Christmas in 1920, we just got on with it etc etc etc 🙄
In context it was a few weeks of amazing sunshine spoiled by climate activists starting fires
Project fear is up and running on channel 4 what a surprise, they don't miss an opportunity.
B.S all of this video!
Except that ... sea levels were 130 meters lower 20,000 years ago than today, And we're stressing for 20cm in 120 years. Imagine if we had mass media back then, the paranoia we'd have. Switch off your TVs
The difference is that back then, there were not that many people living in places that will be below sea level even if it "just" rises by 20 cm. Besides, the AVERAGE sea level rise until 2050 - which is less than 30 years for people like you who struggle with maths - is 30 cm meaning there are many places where the sea level will rise much more than just 30 cm even within those 28 years. DO try to inform yourself before posting rubbish.
@@PEdulis My point is that if sea level rises 130m without human interference, what makes you think we have control over these things?
@@PEdulis of course they were. 20k years ago most humans lived on coastal regions.
@@Madonnalitta1 How many humans could live there now, especially with rising sea waters? What is your suggestion how to deal with the rest? Will you kill all US, Canadian, Australian and European citizens because they contributed way more to climate change than all else combined and then let the rest cope with whatever is left of the planet then? Silly statements like yours just show you WANT to be ignorant, so why do you even post them?
All of these comments only address the issue of rising sea levels. But environmental change is more than that. Its rising temperatures, sea ice melting, extreme weather events (too much rain, not enough rain, high winds, super hot weather) glaciers melting, rivers and lakes drying up, places on the Earth becoming uninhabitable. One hot summer, one wet summer or whatever isnt the point and making stupid comments about it will he better if certain cities go under water is unhelpful. It is a genersl trend over the past few years that we should all be looking at and at all of these events. At what point will people start to believe that it is a problem...when the world just burns up completely??! At least acknowledge there is a problem...then we can try to solve it!
Fortunately, it's governments and big corporations that need to take this information seriously, not individual contrarians on the net who believe their own half arsed observations of remembering how hot it was when they were kids is a match for scientific study. Although greed comes into it when you're dealing with major organisations like governments, so they have a different motive for contradicting these studies.
The claims that 97 percent of scientists supported the global warming theory was exposed as a series of statistical frauds, as was the claim that the 4,000 scientists associated with the IPCC endorsed its report-those 4,000 hadn’t endorsed it, and most hadn’t even read it but had merely reviewed parts of the report and often disagreed with what they read.
The claim that the “science was settled” on climate change never withstood scrutiny. Scientists around the world signed a series of petitions to dispute that claim. The 2008 Oregon Petition, spearheaded by a former president of the National Academy of Science and championed by Freeman Dyson, Albert Einstein’s successor at Princeton and one of the world’s most preeminent scientists, was signed by more than 31,000 scientists and experts who agreed that “the proposed limits on greenhouse gases would harm the environment, hinder the advance of science and technology, and damage the health and welfare of mankind. … Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth.”
The fantastical claim that CO2 is a pollutant was cut out of whole cloth.
The 2008 statement signed by those 31000 scientists included the following.
“there is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gasses is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate” is as true today as it was then, and as it always has been. No scientist anywhere at any time has shown that manmade CO2 emissions-aka nature’s fertilizer-do any harm to anything
Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador said the government will end the subsidies and stop issuing permits for new wind projects. Israel is also set to pull the plug on the country’s wind industry, its environmental protection minister arguing that wind provides a negligible contribution to the country’s power system “compared to the potential for harm to nature, which is high.”
The reality was NEVER what propaganda videos like this one want you to believe it to be.
One model for sea level rise predicts that by 2100, sea levels will have risen by around 2 meters (6 feet); by 2150 up to 4 meters (13 feet). This might not seem too bad, but applied on a global scale this represents an enormous volume of water. Low lying areas will be inundated. Unfortunately this is only the beginning; there is enough ice in Antarctica to raise global sea levels in excess of 200 feet once it has all melted.
Yeah I’m in Britain buddy, we’re only a tiny little island that can be swallowed up by the sea at any time, wether it’s man made or not.
Except that Antarctica has been COOLING overall for 35 years !, last year was a year of RECORD cold.
Antarctic land ice mass has been INCREASING for a very long time.
By the way at current rates sea level will have risen by 117 mm by 2100, likewise that will be 192 mm by 2150 and THAT assumes NO cooling, and overall warming throughout that whole period.
As there has been NO overall warming for most of the last 25 years that seems unlikely.
Following the pattern of the last 8000 years our current warming is likely to be shorter than the Medieval warming of 300 years.
Models are WORTHLESS as predictors and so they have proven, by their results so far, the ONLY accurate way to measure sea level rise is with stable tide gauges.
By the way tell me WHAT Antarctic ice you are suggesting will melt ?
@@peterjones4180 I do not understand why you are so pro terrible air quality and why you are for breathing poisonous chemicals. Even if climate change is wrong it is surely a very good idea to not poison the air we all breathe, why are you arguing FOR terrible air quality when everyone benefits from having better air quality, my kids dont have to spend time indoors when there is a smog warning, they could play outside any day they like....HOW IS THAT A BAD THING? Who would be against having good air quality? Do you also like having pollution in YOUR drinking water as well, are you pro Phosphates and Lead in drinking water as well, or is it just so long as its not in YOUR drinking water peter, but you have no problem with others having to drink polluted water and breathe polluted air? Either you are okay with MY family breathing toxic chemicals because YOUR air is good, which pretty much makes you a selfish a55, or you are okay with it because it makes you money so you dont care....its money isnt it peter.
Poor planet 😔