You can really see the difference once I casted this video to my tv. You can tell its sharper for the ps4. Just like watching a tv show on a regular chanel ( ps3 ) then watching it in the same chanel in hd ( ps4 ). Worth playing it for the ps4. Thanks for the comparison!
No difference you'll notice while playing the game. Lol when you stare at a wall perhaps you will notice a slight difference but who plays a resident evil game that way?
Pretty close. Thank you very much. Have both consoles, but getting PS3 version. Why - nice physical disk. Really hate digital games strategy nowadays - it is a CONSOLE - games should be PHYSICAL.
Lol I know this was said a year ago but this and RE 0 is getting a physical version on the PS4 on the same disk. You're probably eating your words now.
+RedCalx Z still advice to get separately PS3 versions - because 2 in 1 collection on PS4 is very poor - PS3 version has thick colorful manuals and double cover (biohazard/resident evil).
From what I've seen its just the resolution, actually. The textures are the same, I think. Its just that they show up more crisp and clearly in the PS4 version because its running at an overall higher resolution. The PS3 version supposedly runs at 720p while the PS4 version runs at 1080p.
I can't see any differences except of the static background got a little sharper in PS4 version, its not a problem because you can adjust the sharpness setting on your TV in the PS3 version :-D
biggest diferences... better particles on ps4, check 6:15 some shadows and textures look slightly better too. i still think it's not worth it to play on a ps4. I have a PC and ps3 i still went for the ps3 version... much more relaxing and easy to get it running.
Are my eyes not functioning well, or there isn't any difference between those two, except PS4 one has sharper graphic/less blurry, due to resolution probably? Anyway, thanks for this video, was about to get RE Origins collection (I've bought RE Remastered for PS3 already, but now I own PS4), now I change my mind.
The PS4 backgrounds makes it look too obvious that the backgrounds just backdrop images rather than in-game graphics. I think the PS3's lower res and blurriness blends the character models and the background more nicely.
RE2Remake got me hooked into Resident Evil and I just have to experience everything I missed, but looks like this is also a chance for me to get the dust of my old PS3, there is literally no difference except fps, so fuck it.
+Gabriele Riva Only for those people who don't pay attention to the details. But than again details and the frame rate is what made me into a PC gamer.
Gabriele Riva Yes because there is no action on the game what so ever. And if You would like to know frame rate DOES matter in all kinds of video games since the faster the response the better. It also looks much better and smooth when it is at least 60FPS. I could never play with those shitty 30 and even under 30 FPS shitty games on consoles. I only play the exclusive if it really worth it and have an amazing story but if it doesn't I don't really care. That's why I have a top tier PC.
Krisztian Bari Your argument is right in a theoretical and general way. But we aren't talking of a CAVE shmpups. We're talking Resident Evil 1. I could probably finish it at 10fps.
Gabriele Riva Could. Yes. Want to? Nope. Look even in RE1 there are things moving right? So honestly would You like to play with something that barely response and even if it does it looks like a slow motion? Or would You rather play with a firm frame rate which at least hits the movie frame rate? 25-30FP:S. I do like a smooth and fast reaction whatever medium it is. When it is about movies like 3D and 48FPS or 60FPS I totally agreed that all of those are opinions and that people are respond in a different way. But with games it's much more important to have a smooth and fast reaction rather than having a "breaking" picture. The higher the frame rate the higher is the chance that the screen won't give You that tearing effect which happens so many times in games and in movies too. Do You know why we have the golden 24FPS standard for the movies? That was the the best decision in order to have a good budget and in the same time have a perfectly moving picture. Now of course We know that 24FPS at that time was amazing and that it is much cheaper than the higher frame rate technology and We get used to it as well it's NOT the best way for everything. In games You need a much faster frame rate to make sure that the screen won't tear up since there is no one who could edit the frame like they do with the movies so the tearing is really annoying and it is very visible. There is some people who say they don't mind it but most of them are either lying or they really can't see the problem with the speed (it happens.) With that said no matter what game We are playing We could even play Final Fantasy X where We didn't need to hurry but still as tearing are occur it takes away some of the magic of the game and it's just simply annoying. Consoles usually use Motion Blur when they don't have the power to keep fixed 60 FPS or even 30 FPS but it looks really bad most of the times. I'm not really sure why do You tell me that frame rate won't matter but You should consider all of these things buddy. I don't mean to be rude with You I never judge anyone and much less feel like being a troll I just tell You the truth. I could never play less than 60FPS I would rather sacrifice the resolution or the Anti Aliasing or the texture quality but sadly there are no options for this with consoles. Than again I'm a bit weird too since I do watch everything with 60 or 120FPS and play games on those as well. I'm planning to buy a huge 4K 3D TV with native 240HZ so I could enjoy playing 120FPS on 3D that would be amazing. I would also like to try how 144hz and 240hz feels like. Good day mate!
So last gen (xbox360 , PS3) 720p30fps , Concurrent gen (ps4 , Xbone) 1080p60fps PC like always depends on your insides ... and how well they port this game
Honestly the PS3 looks better. It’s a tiny bit more blurred, but it pops more. The PS4 version is sharper but it’s just…bland. Proof that less is more.
É muito mimimi, não vejo diferença nenhuma. É a mesma coisa portanto quem tem o PS3, jogue no PS3 que vc não vai estar perdendo nada de quem está jogando no ps4
The PS4 is superior in graphics, it's got that realism thing going for it, the faces on the PS3 are a bit blurry where you could barely makeup the eyes as for the PS4 the faces are more fleshed out with no blur. Resident Evil HD PS4 is the definitive Edition to play on.
The ps4 pretty much washout aby detailed too shapr and lost any kind of rea shadow effects that was part of the atmosphere which the ps3 closes to the gamecube. Edit: i mean xbox 360 was closes to the gmecube version.
Its pretty much the same, they should have considered 60fps, for ps4, .. Last of us remastered on ps4 is 60fps at native 1080p and more graphical heavy than resident evil origins... Hd remastered is not enough for this game, because re origins is using outdated engine, we already see the maximum graphics of this game on pc and 720p on ps3,.. 60 fps is more major update than hd ,..
You're wrong, ps4 has physically edition together with re zero hd named re origins collection, but ps3 don't have a physically edition on America, just in Japan
Lucas Guidet que estas viendo en el video? La comparación de PS3 a PS4? O la comparación de de PS1 a PS4? Mi comentario va de acorde al vídeo se supone.
Playstation LongPlay Concordo ñ vi quase nenhuma diferença,escroto é do the last of us,tem uma imagem da Tess q atira no cara o sangue do cara no ps3 é realista,já do ps4 é um cristão ou esponja? escroto.
I personally think they should have waited with the next gen consoles, the gen consoles we have now are still good and relevant to use, i dont understand the need to upgrade
La diferencia es la resolución, en ps3 va a 720p reescalados a 1080p (si se usa HDMI y se elige 1080p) y en ps4 va a 1080p nativos, ambas versiones van a 30 fps, solo que no se nota en ps4, la única edición de este RE HD Remaster que va a 60 FPS es la de PC (Steam), las versiones de consola van a 30 fps sin importar que consola o resolución tengan
Maury J. I wasn’t talking about that... I can’t upgrade the tv for now, I just want to know if on that screen I would spot differences between the 2 versions.
the graphics between ps3 & ps4 are too similar special in this game because is already a very old remake game that it first came out on & for gamecube but in hd it totally kicks ass!! & ROCKS DUDES I have the original version for gamecube & i even have the rocket launcher with infinite ammo & all the other weapons have 99 of ammo too.
FielAlManga Haha, thanks I guess. I'm not usually one to make grammatical errors, but whether or not to pluralise organisations has always tripped me up, because in my mind I'm always thinking about the people within that organisation, rather than the organisation as a dehumanised single entity. And I don't know about you, but it doesn't sound incorrect to use it like I did, even if it is.
0:26 ps3's blurriness makes it look better and adds kinda like depth of field.
It's 2021 and I still use my PS3.I don't care about PS5 and all this next-gen crap.PS3 and PS4 are still awesome
I think PS3 version is enough
Only difference seems to be the resolution. PS3 is 720p and PS4 is 1080p.
PS3 version has slightly weaker contrast, evrerything looks a little washed.
Did Resident Evil HD also run at 60 fps in PS3 ?
Dyms roro
no, ps3 is 30fps only
Dyms roro All console versions are 30fps.
Ow ok, thank you.
You can really see the difference once I casted this video to my tv. You can tell its sharper for the ps4. Just like watching a tv show on a regular chanel ( ps3 ) then watching it in the same chanel in hd ( ps4 ). Worth playing it for the ps4. Thanks for the comparison!
7:58 Parallax Mapping on Chris's vest is higher on PS4
No difference you'll notice while playing the game. Lol when you stare at a wall perhaps you will notice a slight difference but who plays a resident evil game that way?
Pretty close. Thank you very much.
Have both consoles, but getting PS3 version. Why - nice physical disk.
Really hate digital games strategy nowadays - it is a CONSOLE - games should be PHYSICAL.
i like disc too.
***** The disk itself has full English language support. You can order it from Play-Asia for example.
Well in January, there's collection of re remake and re zero releasing physically on ps4 so I'll be getting that~
Lol I know this was said a year ago but this and RE 0 is getting a physical version on the PS4 on the same disk. You're probably eating your words now.
+RedCalx Z still advice to get separately PS3 versions - because 2 in 1 collection on PS4 is very poor - PS3 version has thick colorful manuals and double cover (biohazard/resident evil).
Absolutelly the same except higher screen resolution and higher resolution of textures for PS4.
That's what he said =)
higher resolution yes, but bigger textures.. i have my doubts
From what I've seen its just the resolution, actually. The textures are the same, I think. Its just that they show up more crisp and clearly in the PS4 version because its running at an overall higher resolution.
The PS3 version supposedly runs at 720p while the PS4 version runs at 1080p.
couldn't not agree more
The fps is the new on ps4, but on a slow paced game like this that really dosen't make any big difference.
I can't see any differences except of the static background got a little sharper in PS4 version, its not a problem because you can adjust the sharpness setting on your TV in the PS3 version :-D
no need to discuss the quality of the graphics but most importantly be able to play because there is already resident evil remastered
not much difference tbh PS4 only just slightly abit sharper
beautiful background music ....relaxing
Bruno Mars ;)
biggest diferences... better particles on ps4, check 6:15 some shadows and textures look slightly better too.
i still think it's not worth it to play on a ps4. I have a PC and ps3 i still went for the ps3 version... much more relaxing and easy to get it running.
Thx for video! I will buy it for my old gen, just do not see differences, only resolution :-)
Are my eyes not functioning well, or there isn't any difference between those two, except PS4 one has sharper graphic/less blurry, due to resolution probably?
Anyway, thanks for this video, was about to get RE Origins collection (I've bought RE Remastered for PS3 already, but now I own PS4), now I change my mind.
The PS4 backgrounds makes it look too obvious that the backgrounds just backdrop images rather than in-game graphics.
I think the PS3's lower res and blurriness blends the character models and the background more nicely.
RE2Remake got me hooked into Resident Evil and I just have to experience everything I missed, but looks like this is also a chance for me to get the dust of my old PS3, there is literally no difference except fps, so fuck it.
No, even fps is 30 on ps4/xbox one, only pc version gives 60fps
What I don't like is at no point was any character movement shown. All still shots. I'd like to see Chris running for comparison
Pretty much identical.
+Gabriele Riva
Only for those people who don't pay attention to the details. But than again details and the frame rate is what made me into a PC gamer.
Krisztian Bari
Framerate in a fixed screen game is really accessory...
Gabriele Riva
Yes because there is no action on the game what so ever.
And if You would like to know frame rate DOES matter in all kinds of video games since the faster the response the better.
It also looks much better and smooth when it is at least 60FPS.
I could never play with those shitty 30 and even under 30 FPS shitty games on consoles.
I only play the exclusive if it really worth it and have an amazing story but if it doesn't I don't really care.
That's why I have a top tier PC.
Krisztian Bari
Your argument is right in a theoretical and general way. But we aren't talking of a CAVE shmpups. We're talking Resident Evil 1. I could probably finish it at 10fps.
Gabriele Riva
Could. Yes. Want to? Nope.
Look even in RE1 there are things moving right?
So honestly would You like to play with something that barely response and even if it does it looks like a slow motion?
Or would You rather play with a firm frame rate which at least hits the movie frame rate?
25-30FP:S.
I do like a smooth and fast reaction whatever medium it is.
When it is about movies like 3D and 48FPS or 60FPS I totally agreed that all of those are opinions and that people are respond in a different way.
But with games it's much more important to have a smooth and fast reaction rather than having a "breaking" picture.
The higher the frame rate the higher is the chance that the screen won't give You that tearing effect which happens so many times in games and in movies too.
Do You know why we have the golden 24FPS standard for the movies?
That was the the best decision in order to have a good budget and in the same time have a perfectly moving picture.
Now of course We know that 24FPS at that time was amazing and that it is much cheaper than the higher frame rate technology and We get used to it as well it's NOT the best way for everything.
In games You need a much faster frame rate to make sure that the screen won't tear up since there is no one who could edit the frame like they do with the movies so the tearing is really annoying and it is very visible.
There is some people who say they don't mind it but most of them are either lying or they really can't see the problem with the speed (it happens.)
With that said no matter what game We are playing We could even play Final Fantasy X where We didn't need to hurry but still as tearing are occur it takes away some of the magic of the game and it's just simply annoying.
Consoles usually use Motion Blur when they don't have the power to keep fixed 60 FPS or even 30 FPS but it looks really bad most of the times.
I'm not really sure why do You tell me that frame rate won't matter but You should consider all of these things buddy.
I don't mean to be rude with You I never judge anyone and much less feel like being a troll I just tell You the truth.
I could never play less than 60FPS I would rather sacrifice the resolution or the Anti Aliasing or the texture quality but sadly there are no options for this with consoles.
Than again I'm a bit weird too since I do watch everything with 60 or 120FPS and play games on those as well.
I'm planning to buy a huge 4K 3D TV with native 240HZ so I could enjoy playing 120FPS on 3D that would be amazing.
I would also like to try how 144hz and 240hz feels like.
Good day mate!
Not much difference there, just that a PS4 is sharper than the PS3. Thanks for the comparison. I am getting a PS3 version because of low GB space.
better than DIgitalFoundry lol xD
nice video, really.
Barely any differences at all, asides from the sharper pre-rendered backgrounds of the PS4.
So last gen (xbox360 , PS3) 720p30fps ,
Concurrent gen (ps4 , Xbone) 1080p60fps
PC like always depends on your insides ... and how well they port this game
Resident Evil 3 is not available on the PS4. What am I supposed to play when I get a PS4 someday? :(
Have you got your ps4 already? Its about time.
Ps4 resolution it's a little bit more smooth. But both are the same
That slight blurriness of the PS3 version would go away if you play it on your own TV that is assuming your TV isn't bigger than 40'' .
Honestly the PS3 looks better. It’s a tiny bit more blurred, but it pops more. The PS4 version is sharper but it’s just…bland. Proof that less is more.
That literally makes no sense. How is something that’s blurred gonna pop out more as opposed to something that’s sharper and HAS MORE DETAIL
OMG it came for ps3!!??? omg i thought it was only for ps4 and Xbox . omg im crazy looking for it!!!!
É muito mimimi, não vejo diferença nenhuma. É a mesma coisa portanto quem tem o PS3, jogue no PS3 que vc não vai estar perdendo nada de quem está jogando no ps4
only thing that Is different are the consoles
donkey Kong and the resolution
I'm pissed I can't play my ps3 version on my ps4 I have to buy the fucking game twice because I didn't pre order
Both look the exact same way
Thanks for the video.
The PS4 is superior in graphics, it's got that realism thing going for it, the faces on the PS3 are a bit blurry where you could barely makeup the eyes as for the PS4 the faces are more fleshed out with no blur.
Resident Evil HD PS4 is the definitive Edition to play on.
The ps4 pretty much washout aby detailed too shapr and lost any kind of rea shadow effects that was part of the atmosphere which the ps3 closes to the gamecube. Edit: i mean xbox 360 was closes to the gmecube version.
@Gavin Townsley true
We're talking about a 2002 game here. Both consoles are more than powerful enough for it...
Ich Bin Technically 1996
Not really. This game was remade from the ground up. The only thing that those two games have in common is the name and the characters.
Went back to this game because Halloween. Still holds up even 16 years later!
What's the name of the music playing in the background?
Bilal Parasail - Silent Partner :)
***** Thanks! Very cool song.
I wish I could get Re0-1 remake on disc for my ps3
PS3 looks like Direcxt 9.0c
PS4 looks like Direcxt 11.2 graphics 😃
Its pretty much the same, they should have considered 60fps, for ps4, .. Last of us remastered on ps4 is 60fps at native 1080p and more graphical heavy than resident evil origins... Hd remastered is not enough for this game, because re origins is using outdated engine, we already see the maximum graphics of this game on pc and 720p on ps3,.. 60 fps is more major update than hd ,..
May i know the bgm song you used during this video ?
Good game but crapcom did poor job upgrading backgrounds as they at times to pixelized... :(
Exact the same thing on ps3 and onps4pro. You get the exact same experience!!!
It's freaking stupid and shame they didn't release this physically on PS4, anywhere! Capcom, what's wrong with you?!
MadFinnTech i am agree with you. CAPCOM just release PS3 Physical Disc. i dont know why. they also did the same thing against STRIDER.
Yes they did.
+GutiRx Yes Resident Evil Origins Collection
You're wrong, ps4 has physically edition together with re zero hd named re origins collection, but ps3 don't have a physically edition on America, just in Japan
Well it has now via Resident Evil Origins Collection
I’m sorry that I been triggered but WHY THE F*CK IS THIS REMAKE FOR PS3 IN 2015?! The PS4 port is almost the same!
Is the same and it's because this game was made for a weaker console so it runs like it was nothing in both consoles.
Luz más fría y un poquito más definido pero grandes cambios para nada
I can not see any other difference then the ps4 is a bit more brigther.
Try Copare it to Xbox One or 360.
en este remake, la verdad que la diferencia no es muy grande.
en serio lo dices ? ...
Lucas Guidet si, PS3 y PS4 es casi lo mismo.
+Fernando Reyes la remasterización es de ps1 a ps3 y ps4, no de ps3 a ps4 (ósea tendrías que comparar lo de ps1 con cualquiera de estos 2)
Lucas Guidet que estas viendo en el video? La comparación de PS3 a PS4? O la comparación de de PS1 a PS4? Mi comentario va de acorde al vídeo se supone.
+Lucas Guidet de hecho es una remaster del remake de GameCube
see the game in tv full hd and will see the big difference between 1080p and 720p =)
Alejandro Rivas not in the case of the remake hd, backgrounds are the gamecube ones upscaled.
The ps3 has that loses shadow effect like the gamecube so better.
Não tem diferença alguma entre ambas as versões.
Playstation LongPlay Concordo ñ vi quase nenhuma diferença,escroto é do the last of us,tem uma imagem da Tess q atira no cara o sangue do cara no ps3 é realista,já do ps4 é um cristão ou esponja? escroto.
PlayStation LongPlay Realmente no vídeo eu não vi diferença alguma, porém jogando você percebe a bem a diferença.
Diferença está na resolução e no framerate
No PS4 é 60 fps e 1080p ?
ps4 more bright n clear
I wont lit the difference they have is a different colour.
Im sure the ps3 hardware can pull off the ps4 resolution
yes, i think too....
I personally think they should have waited with the next gen consoles, the gen consoles we have now are still good and relevant to use, i dont understand the need to upgrade
I agree...... all gay..... rsrsrsrsrsrs
So who won? I want to know the opinions of others. thanks.
Looks the same to me!
Ps4 because of the 60 fps
Can you get the PS4 version as a physical copy?
Sort of, it comes in a box but it has a soundtrack cd and a voucher for digital download
OBEYCorruptFoxx Where from though? I haven't seen it anywhere. Thanks man.
Vladimir Lazarevic Playasia has the disc version. Even though its an import the game is in full english.
PS4 version is on physical….nuff said.
Didn't like the added background music..
yo no noto ninguna diferencia...
Maria Teresa La diferencia es mas que nada en cuanto a fps se refiere
La diferencia es la resolución, en ps3 va a 720p reescalados a 1080p (si se usa HDMI y se elige 1080p) y en ps4 va a 1080p nativos, ambas versiones van a 30 fps, solo que no se nota en ps4, la única edición de este RE HD Remaster que va a 60 FPS es la de PC (Steam), las versiones de consola van a 30 fps sin importar que consola o resolución tengan
If you use hdmi on ps3 it will look exact the same as ps4
Nichole nope....resolution on the ps4 are higher
@@mauryj.3415 I have a 32" fullHD tv, do you think there are evident differences in graphics if I play the ps3 version instead of the ps4 version?
@@Slask7 its 2019... who still has a 32 inch TV?...55 inch TVs are so cheap these days.
Maury J. I wasn’t talking about that... I can’t upgrade the tv for now, I just want to know if on that screen I would spot differences between the 2 versions.
@@Slask7 yes you would because ps4 version has less jaggies due to better anti-alliasing
ada tambahan efek di grafik ps4
same
I literally just bought this game on PS3 :/
Humble Bundle right?
If you dont have a PS4 you might as well have bought this, if you own a PS4 that is a gigantic mistake
TheMustacheGamer Yeah, I bought it like a week before it was announced. Still enjoyed it on PS3 tho
You did nothing wrong dude, enjoy your ps3 copy.
Veteran Soul I wouldn't say a month and a half ago was a while back but yeah
Ps4 is slightly better. Ps3 is more blurry
rodrigo villanueva yep but in the case of the remake hd lower resolution= better quality
it has versus mode ?
ps4 is way better
ps3 is to washed
WARSHED.
não vi diferença nenhuma
eu tbm não.. sera que muda msm?
So marginal, nope I'm happy.
PS3 720p @30fps PS4 native 1080p @60fps thats my opinion
PS4 is slightly better
do you think I'd notice differences if I play the ps3 version (720p) on a 32-40" 1080p screen?
I don't see any differences LOL So PS4 is a waste of hardware.
the graphics between ps3 & ps4 are too similar special in this game because is already a very old remake game that it first came out on & for gamecube but in hd it totally kicks ass!! & ROCKS DUDES I have the original version for gamecube & i even have the rocket launcher with infinite ammo & all the other weapons have 99 of ammo too.
Não
dude dude Random
Ps4 version is better
ps3 yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
The same!!!bahh
ps3 is 30 fps and ps4 60
So mais ante ps4 mrm
Why do people do this stuff its so goddamn stupid
To asure the product's quality for people. It helps when deciding to buy it or not.
+Evaquiel from this ??? REALLY !
I've heard this music before. Don't Digital Foundry use it in their comparisons?
FielAlManga Haha, thanks I guess. I'm not usually one to make grammatical errors, but whether or not to pluralise organisations has always tripped me up, because in my mind I'm always thinking about the people within that organisation, rather than the organisation as a dehumanised single entity. And I don't know about you, but it doesn't sound incorrect to use it like I did, even if it is.
Bruno Mars - Lock out of heaven, You're welcome ;)