Darwin 240 Johnny 5 Maiden flight . How good is it ? 🤷‍♂️

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 23 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 19

  • @johngreen5837
    @johngreen5837 Рік тому +1

    Dude i just ordered this analog with elrs. $192. I hope this is a good first 5 inch for me buddy.

  • @CarolinaAirshots
    @CarolinaAirshots Рік тому +2

    Nice flight

  • @Sugalime3D_FPV
    @Sugalime3D_FPV Рік тому

    It comes with very old Betaflight 4.1. Have you flashed a newer Betaflight firmware on the FC ? If yes, which hardware target did you select ? Because the sheets say firmware target: MATEKF405. But Betaflight Configurator 10.8 does not auto-recognize the target and I can only select different variants MATEKF405XXX ? Does it matter which variant I select ? The FC board does not has a label which variant it is exactly... I can not find this board at MATEK too...
    The problem is that I can not bind my Remote. Neither binding with binding phrase doesn't work because it says IVALID name in command line nor traditional binding doesn't work with the dobbel blinking of the receiver and the binding button on the remote. It double blinks but they do not bind... What is also strange is that in Betaflight Receiver Tab Serial Receiver CRSF is set instead of ELRS. And ELRS is not selectable at all... I don't think it's a Crossfire module. There is no label on the installed DarwinFPV ELRS receiver but the antenna looks like ELRS antenna...
    I think the this drone will probably only be BNF when I to a higher version of BETAFLIGHT ? Because maybe the old Betaflight 4.1 did not recognize the ELRS receiver ?

    • @StrickleeFpv
      @StrickleeFpv  Рік тому +1

      Ok so no I don’t run newer beta flight because the processor will not handle it and from my understanding is elrs is crsf protocol on older beta flight as the both use same hook up Rx 1 tx 1 . I do use Crossfire nano and it works fine have not had any Rx issue . You do have to turn on the serial Rx for the corresponding Rx tx uart that you are hooked to . I had to go to ports and turn on the serial port as well as I believe 5 has to be on for Bluetooth anttena to transmit to the speedy bee app . I wish I could help further but I’m not running elrs . And I heard to many issues trying to flash 4.4 that gyro goes nuts or it bricks the rc . So I left it alone and run what it came with . Been about 5 months now and it’s been solid after a little p and d gain and balance increase for my go pro weight . Did have prop wash but the slight adjustment eliminated it.

    • @Sugalime3D_FPV
      @Sugalime3D_FPV Рік тому

      @@StrickleeFpv I think I know what the problem is now. My Literadio3 has ELRS 2.0.1 and the receiver from J5 probably has ELRS 3.0. Also my BETAFPV SuperD ELRS3.0 does not work. In addition, it may not be possible to downgrade the receiver to 2.0 with the ELRS configurator (especially since the DarwinFPV receiver doesn't even have a label and can't be found in the shop because of its appearance. I don't even know what receiver I have... I need to ask DarwinFPV) and that there is currently no firmware 3.0 for the LiteRadio3. And some people say downgrade a ELRS receiver from 3.0 top 2.0 is not possible. The whole thing is really unbelievable. LiteRadio3 is really rubbish!

    • @Sugalime3D_FPV
      @Sugalime3D_FPV Рік тому

      It works now because I'm temporarily using the BETAFPV ELRS Lite Receiver V1.0 with Tower Antenna. According to BETAFPV, the ELRS has 2.0. However, it is not ideal for a 5 inch quadcopter... Although tests show that it has a range of up to 2 km...

  • @dronefilmsgermany
    @dronefilmsgermany Рік тому +2

    Is it better than the eachine wizard x220 v3?

    • @StrickleeFpv
      @StrickleeFpv  Рік тому

      It’s good but I have never tried the wizard so I really couldn’t compare it . Definitely has all the bells and whistles for the price . Love the speedy bee app connection via Bluetooth . Makes it so easy to adjust and tune from the phone

  • @johngreen5837
    @johngreen5837 Рік тому

    What did you think of the origional analog cam vs runcam Phoenix

    • @StrickleeFpv
      @StrickleeFpv  Рік тому +1

      Night and day . Literally . The run cam Phoenix 2 has way better low light and color . Stock is ok. But definitely worth the upgrade or little extra go with foxeer .

  • @zappex92
    @zappex92 Рік тому +2

    You use SBUS ?

  • @Sugalime3D_FPV
    @Sugalime3D_FPV Рік тому +1

    Hi. What cam it has ?

    • @StrickleeFpv
      @StrickleeFpv  Рік тому +1

      Run cam Phoenix 2 . The stock was not the best but still good . I fly In lowlight so upgraded to a better lowlight camera .

    • @Sugalime3D_FPV
      @Sugalime3D_FPV Рік тому +1

      @@StrickleeFpv The 19 mm standard version, not the 14 mm nano version. Right ?

    • @Sugalime3D_FPV
      @Sugalime3D_FPV Рік тому

      @@StrickleeFpv low light. Cool. What is it ?

    • @StrickleeFpv
      @StrickleeFpv  Рік тому +1

      @@Sugalime3D_FPV right the micro not the nano the nano will fit with the adapter but I don’t like the plug to the vtx is just wires the micro plugs right in with the stock connector I have a nano as a temp cam on my wasp build it works for now .

    • @StrickleeFpv
      @StrickleeFpv  Рік тому +2

      @@Sugalime3D_FPV it gets well beyond sunset where my go pro is to dark I can still see in my goggles . I forget the tv stats on the actual numbers but it’s on the run cam description . If you like any parking lot night flying it’s a great analog camera for price