Please note that Brahmn sanskruti didn't got revived after maurya samrajya, but got foothold only after maurya samrajya....Krishna was from Sraman sanskruti....proof.. his cousin Arista Nemi is a Tirthankar of Jains/Sraman sanskruti....
But Krishna ne Ved ko praman mana to ve Shraman kaise ho sakte hai.Sharman Anishwarwadi hai or Krishna ne swayam ko ishwar ka avtar/Ishwar kaha hai to phir ve Shraman kaise hue. Vedic dharm uske liye hai jo aastik hai and jo ved ko praman Nahi manta hai vo naastik/Sharman hai .Or bhai wali baat se aap ye nahi keh sakte hai uska bhai naastik ho to vo bhi Krishna bhi nastik hi hai. Krishna ke apne bhai sirf Balram the jo ki Aastik the 🙏🏼
@@natwarbharatam2978hmins ne ulta sidha likh hai . Koi Krishna ne ved nahi mana balki ved ka virodh kiya . Iska proof hai Krishna ne Indra ka Yagya rukwaya tha. Agar Krishna ved ko mante to kya woh Indra ka Yagya ko rukwate ?
@@natwarbharatam2978Ram aur Krishna sraman Dharm ke the Shiva Kali Hanuman Adivasi devta the . Brahmin dharm ke gods toh Indra Agni Varun Surya Vishnu bripaspati hai . Brahmin ne Ram Krishna sraman ko Vishnu ka Avatar ya tak ki buddha ko bhi Vishnu ka Avatar bataya taki buddhist Brahmins Dharm ke andar aa gaye . Aur Brahmins ki gulami kare woh aaj tak kar rahe hai. Aur Puran main Ram aur Krishna ko apamanit kiya Krishna ko 16108 patni wala banaya aur Ram se saare ku karm karaye ramayan main . Asal Ram ko janna hai toh ek bar Dasrath jatak katha padho waha Sita Ram ki behen hai patni nahi hai. Samjhe
@@swarupdas2552 ye bahuto ko lagta hai. But Brahamn Aryan nahi bhi ho sakta hai. Tamil Brhamin jo Shaiv hai, wo Austric hai. But pamirian jaat, kasmiri, Gujjar, Sythian, me Aryan ke DNA milta hai.
Ye mera personal thought h. Varna vyavastha naa karm aadharit thi, naa janm aadharit thi. Wo buddhi aadharit thi. Btata hu kaise. Kisi bhi class mein 50 bachhe h. Wo 50 ke 50 bachon ka same understanding level, same memorisation power, same cognition nhi ho sakta. Sab bache apne apne level pe apna apna subject pakad lete honge jo unhe achhe se samajh ata hoga. Brahman apne aap mein koi varn nhi h. Brahm ko jaanne wala Brahman kehlaya. Jisse vedon ka gyan ho gya wo purohit ban gya, jo karm kaand karne lag gya wo pandit ban gya jo ki actual mein titles h. Jo shastra chalane mein nipun ho gya wo kshatriya ban gya aur jo economy chalane laga wo vaishya ban gya. Ab koi bacha jo inme se kisi bhi subject ko nhi kar paya wo society mein at least manual labor in the form cleaning, farming karne laga kyunki society mein kuch toh contribution karna padega. Ye h initial setting. In fact ye bhi mentioned h ki shudron ke alawa kisi ko bhi bhoomi rakhne ka right nhi tha. Initially society flexible thi, log kam thay, aur sab ek dusre ki help karte thay. Dheere dheere society orthodox hone lagi aur uska bhi reason btata hu kyu. Maan lo ek bacha kisi bhi pehli 3 settings mein paida hua. Ab wo bacha naa to naa to ved padh paya, naa shastra vidya seekh paya, naa economy chalane ke liye business ya usse related skilled labor seekh paya. Ab parent ko h ki main to manual labor nhi karvaunga. Main ye kra h to mera bacha bhi yehi kaam karna chahiye- jaise aaj ki date mein farming aur cleaning ko chhodke majority parents apne bachon ko same ya milti julti occupation mein daalte h ya apne end pe koshish karte h. Ye same feeling tab ki society mein minds corrupt karne lag gyi. And mind it corruption aisi cheez h jo har sphere mein kahin se creep in karke apni jagah bna leti h. Paison ki corruption nhi, adharm (unrighteousness) ki corruption. Isse sab log dheere dheere rigid hone lagi aur uska gye. Varn ke andar castes bani, castes ke andar subcastes bani aur ye baat sirf castes tak seemit nhi h. Aap religion bhi uthakr dekh lein aapko kitne alag alag divisions dekhne ko milengi. Ye adharm ki corruption ne har jagah pe aakr gandagi failayi h. Aap economy chalane wale section mein hi dekhiye. Doctors, engineers, farmers, barbers, tanners, tailors, grocers, cobblers ye sab ek varna vaishya varn mein aate h but inme kyu division aya kyunki yahan paise aur social status ki wajah se corruption aayi. Pehle koi kisi ke under nhi kaam karta tha but dheere dheere naukri ka concept aya phir ye kaha gya ki uttam krishi, madhyam vyavsay v nikrisht naukri kyunki kisi ke under kaam karna mushkil hota tha. Ultimately society aaj jahan h, ye sab unrighteousness ki corruption ki wajah se h. Rahi baat ved aur shraman ki aur baaki religions ki bhi, goal sabka ek h, raaste alag alag h. Kisi ka raasta kisi se bada nhi h. Sab apni pace se uss destination pe pohonchne ki koshish karte h rhe h. Charvak ke accordingly koi destination hi nhi h, wo alag philosophy h agr koi 6 schools of philosophy padhta h. Jahan par aapko edible food in abundance milega, wahan aapko jeebh ke swaad ke liye dusre animal ko maarne ke zarurat nhi. Jahan aapko kuch khaane ko hi nhi milega, you’re bound to perish. Ab koi greenland mein paida ho jaye yaa mongolia ke pahadon mei paida ho jaye, wo apni body ko alive kaise rakhega. Usse khana padega maans. So practical pov se sab chalein. Sabhi literatures ko padhein, samjhein, kisi ko neecha naa dikhayein aur intentionally kisi bhi living being ko harm naa karein aur agr ho jaye toh maafi maang lein. Ab kuch kahenge ki farming mein zyada keede marte h, non veg mien ek hi animal marta h. Jis animal ko aap maarkar khaa rhe h kya wo paida hote hi utna bada ho gya tha. Machhli ne apni se chhoti machhli ko khaya hoga tabhi toh badi hui. Aap uss time pe ek animal nhi balki uss animal ke lifetime ke jitne animals h un sabko consume kar rhe h. Isliye vichaar karein.
I don't think there was brahmin revival it was never the main religion. It was only a minority religion brought by people from bmac culture and it was mostly in pockets of North India and they were mostly into astrology and doing rituals which may have favored them in courts of few kings. After fall of buddhism they took power in vacuum and began writing their glory books. it's no coincidence their temple began popping up after Islam started entering India. Shramanas were the one looking after running of kingdoms even in chandragupta maurya time.
Sharman ve log ya tradition tha Jinhone Vedic Dharm and uska apaurushey hone par sawal uthaya. Sharman cult ka aarambh Charvak sanhita se hua hai jiske writer Guru vrihaspati the. Sharman is a naastik Philosophy who deny the existence of Good. Unhone ne vedon ke viruudh me apna philosophy start kiya it means Vedic Culture, Tradition and Philosophy already exist in a powerful way. Sharman challenge the existence of God and Vedasy.Sharman is a philosophy not a tradition, Culture and Dharma.🙏🏼
There is no any evidence of Sharman tradition in south India. Sharman philosophy mostly evolved near Magadh empire/Patliputra. There is thousand of evidence of Vedic Culture in southern part of India. Even Chankya a Brahmin ancestral village is in South India and He was proffessor in Taxila . Sharman philosophy expanded by Ashoka after accepting Baudh Dharm. Before Baudh Dharm He was follower of Shiva, Sanatan Dharma and Shaivism emerges from South 🙏🏼
@@natwarbharatam2978 no evidence of material culture of brahmins before 6th century apart from some grants given to them. They were a small sect only active in some pockets of North India. Sramana had left material as well as intellectual proof writing down stuff on rocks and caves. Brahmins only rose to power after buddhism fell after Islam conquest in north which was vajrayana sect at that time and converted those gods in Hindu gods. Brahmanism moved south gradually with brahmins working for Muslims as they were small sect and were not danger to them and slowly started capturing power which was left vacant by buddhist. Why are you creating false history of shiva and ashoka there was no shiva in ashoka edicts lol it was a later dated God. Yeah and ignoring Nalanda and takshasheela University. Vedas was nothing but a personal commentary on people of india by iranic people who came from outside. They had no intellectual content in it and they shrouded it in a mystery making it seem like some knowledge but it wasn't and it was not read by local people as they were foreigners and it's last form upanishads were added later date and was influenced by Nagarjunas shunyawad.
![[Art & Culture] Visual Arts | Indian Architecture | Temple Architecture (Nagara Style) | UPSC](/img/n.gif)
Dosto class ko like bhi kar diya karo yrrrr...sir bahut accha padhate hai
One of the best educator ,I have seen ever! ✨Thank you a lot sir for this amazing session ❤🤩
Thank you❤❤❤❤ sir
Please note that Brahmn sanskruti didn't got revived after maurya samrajya, but got foothold only after maurya samrajya....Krishna was from Sraman sanskruti....proof.. his cousin Arista Nemi is a Tirthankar of Jains/Sraman sanskruti....
But Krishna ne Ved ko praman mana to ve Shraman kaise ho sakte hai.Sharman Anishwarwadi hai or Krishna ne swayam ko ishwar ka avtar/Ishwar kaha hai to phir ve Shraman kaise hue. Vedic dharm uske liye hai jo aastik hai and jo ved ko praman Nahi manta hai vo naastik/Sharman hai .Or bhai wali baat se aap ye nahi keh sakte hai uska bhai naastik ho to vo bhi Krishna bhi nastik hi hai. Krishna ke apne bhai sirf Balram the jo ki Aastik the 🙏🏼
@@natwarbharatam2978hmins ne ulta sidha likh hai . Koi Krishna ne ved nahi mana balki ved ka virodh kiya . Iska proof hai Krishna ne Indra ka Yagya rukwaya tha. Agar Krishna ved ko mante to kya woh Indra ka Yagya ko rukwate ?
@@natwarbharatam2978Ram aur Krishna sraman Dharm ke the Shiva Kali Hanuman Adivasi devta the . Brahmin dharm ke gods toh Indra Agni Varun Surya Vishnu bripaspati hai . Brahmin ne Ram Krishna sraman ko Vishnu ka Avatar ya tak ki buddha ko bhi Vishnu ka Avatar bataya taki buddhist Brahmins Dharm ke andar aa gaye . Aur Brahmins ki gulami kare woh aaj tak kar rahe hai. Aur Puran main Ram aur Krishna ko apamanit kiya Krishna ko 16108 patni wala banaya aur Ram se saare ku karm karaye ramayan main . Asal Ram ko janna hai toh ek bar Dasrath jatak katha padho waha Sita Ram ki behen hai patni nahi hai. Samjhe
@@swarupdas2552 ye bahuto ko lagta hai. But Brahamn Aryan nahi bhi ho sakta hai. Tamil Brhamin jo Shaiv hai, wo Austric hai. But pamirian jaat, kasmiri, Gujjar, Sythian, me Aryan ke DNA milta hai.
Tq sir ji 🙏🙏🙏
Ye mera personal thought h. Varna vyavastha naa karm aadharit thi, naa janm aadharit thi. Wo buddhi aadharit thi. Btata hu kaise. Kisi bhi class mein 50 bachhe h. Wo 50 ke 50 bachon ka same understanding level, same memorisation power, same cognition nhi ho sakta. Sab bache apne apne level pe apna apna subject pakad lete honge jo unhe achhe se samajh ata hoga. Brahman apne aap mein koi varn nhi h. Brahm ko jaanne wala Brahman kehlaya. Jisse vedon ka gyan ho gya wo purohit ban gya, jo karm kaand karne lag gya wo pandit ban gya jo ki actual mein titles h. Jo shastra chalane mein nipun ho gya wo kshatriya ban gya aur jo economy chalane laga wo vaishya ban gya. Ab koi bacha jo inme se kisi bhi subject ko nhi kar paya wo society mein at least manual labor in the form cleaning, farming karne laga kyunki society mein kuch toh contribution karna padega. Ye h initial setting. In fact ye bhi mentioned h ki shudron ke alawa kisi ko bhi bhoomi rakhne ka right nhi tha. Initially society flexible thi, log kam thay, aur sab ek dusre ki help karte thay. Dheere dheere society orthodox hone lagi aur uska bhi reason btata hu kyu. Maan lo ek bacha kisi bhi pehli 3 settings mein paida hua. Ab wo bacha naa to naa to ved padh paya, naa shastra vidya seekh paya, naa economy chalane ke liye business ya usse related skilled labor seekh paya. Ab parent ko h ki main to manual labor nhi karvaunga. Main ye kra h to mera bacha bhi yehi kaam karna chahiye- jaise aaj ki date mein farming aur cleaning ko chhodke majority parents apne bachon ko same ya milti julti occupation mein daalte h ya apne end pe koshish karte h. Ye same feeling tab ki society mein minds corrupt karne lag gyi. And mind it corruption aisi cheez h jo har sphere mein kahin se creep in karke apni jagah bna leti h. Paison ki corruption nhi, adharm (unrighteousness) ki corruption. Isse sab log dheere dheere rigid hone lagi aur uska gye. Varn ke andar castes bani, castes ke andar subcastes bani aur ye baat sirf castes tak seemit nhi h. Aap religion bhi uthakr dekh lein aapko kitne alag alag divisions dekhne ko milengi. Ye adharm ki corruption ne har jagah pe aakr gandagi failayi h. Aap economy chalane wale section mein hi dekhiye. Doctors, engineers, farmers, barbers, tanners, tailors, grocers, cobblers ye sab ek varna vaishya varn mein aate h but inme kyu division aya kyunki yahan paise aur social status ki wajah se corruption aayi. Pehle koi kisi ke under nhi kaam karta tha but dheere dheere naukri ka concept aya phir ye kaha gya ki uttam krishi, madhyam vyavsay v nikrisht naukri kyunki kisi ke under kaam karna mushkil hota tha. Ultimately society aaj jahan h, ye sab unrighteousness ki corruption ki wajah se h. Rahi baat ved aur shraman ki aur baaki religions ki bhi, goal sabka ek h, raaste alag alag h. Kisi ka raasta kisi se bada nhi h. Sab apni pace se uss destination pe pohonchne ki koshish karte h rhe h. Charvak ke accordingly koi destination hi nhi h, wo alag philosophy h agr koi 6 schools of philosophy padhta h. Jahan par aapko edible food in abundance milega, wahan aapko jeebh ke swaad ke liye dusre animal ko maarne ke zarurat nhi. Jahan aapko kuch khaane ko hi nhi milega, you’re bound to perish. Ab koi greenland mein paida ho jaye yaa mongolia ke pahadon mei paida ho jaye, wo apni body ko alive kaise rakhega. Usse khana padega maans. So practical pov se sab chalein. Sabhi literatures ko padhein, samjhein, kisi ko neecha naa dikhayein aur intentionally kisi bhi living being ko harm naa karein aur agr ho jaye toh maafi maang lein. Ab kuch kahenge ki farming mein zyada keede marte h, non veg mien ek hi animal marta h. Jis animal ko aap maarkar khaa rhe h kya wo paida hote hi utna bada ho gya tha. Machhli ne apni se chhoti machhli ko khaya hoga tabhi toh badi hui. Aap uss time pe ek animal nhi balki uss animal ke lifetime ke jitne animals h un sabko consume kar rhe h. Isliye vichaar karein.
Thanks Sir 🙏 😊 comprehensive Analysis. 👌
Thank you so much unacademy for bringing Rajneesh Raj sir on this platform.
Sir aapka pratek video ati mahtvpurn hai thank u so much 🙏🙏🙏
धन्यवाद गुरु जी 🙏
You r such a great teacher for me sir
Thank u for this class and being my Meantor
Thank you so much acharya 🙏🙏🙏🙏
Great...
Thank you so much sir class bahut achhi lagi
Thank you sir 🙏🙏🙏
Present And Done Sir.......
Thank you 🙂 Sir g 🙏🙏❤️❤️
Main bhi shraman hu
Thank you sir🙏 I watched full video .
I am Nitika
Great explanation
Thankyou sir 🙏🙏🙏
Nice seccion sir ji
I don't think there was brahmin revival it was never the main religion. It was only a minority religion brought by people from bmac culture and it was mostly in pockets of North India and they were mostly into astrology and doing rituals which may have favored them in courts of few kings. After fall of buddhism they took power in vacuum and began writing their glory books. it's no coincidence their temple began popping up after Islam started entering India. Shramanas were the one looking after running of kingdoms even in chandragupta maurya time.
Sharman ve log ya tradition tha Jinhone Vedic Dharm and uska apaurushey hone par sawal uthaya. Sharman cult ka aarambh Charvak sanhita se hua hai jiske writer Guru vrihaspati the. Sharman is a naastik Philosophy who deny the existence of Good. Unhone ne vedon ke viruudh me apna philosophy start kiya it means Vedic Culture, Tradition and Philosophy already exist in a powerful way. Sharman challenge the existence of God and Vedasy.Sharman is a philosophy not a tradition, Culture and Dharma.🙏🏼
There is no any evidence of Sharman tradition in south India. Sharman philosophy mostly evolved near Magadh empire/Patliputra. There is thousand of evidence of Vedic Culture in southern part of India. Even Chankya a Brahmin ancestral village is in South India and He was proffessor in Taxila . Sharman philosophy expanded by Ashoka after accepting Baudh Dharm. Before Baudh Dharm He was follower of Shiva, Sanatan Dharma and Shaivism emerges from South 🙏🏼
@@natwarbharatam2978 no evidence of material culture of brahmins before 6th century apart from some grants given to them. They were a small sect only active in some pockets of North India. Sramana had left material as well as intellectual proof writing down stuff on rocks and caves. Brahmins only rose to power after buddhism fell after Islam conquest in north which was vajrayana sect at that time and converted those gods in Hindu gods. Brahmanism moved south gradually with brahmins working for Muslims as they were small sect and were not danger to them and slowly started capturing power which was left vacant by buddhist. Why are you creating false history of shiva and ashoka there was no shiva in ashoka edicts lol it was a later dated God. Yeah and ignoring Nalanda and takshasheela University. Vedas was nothing but a personal commentary on people of india by iranic people who came from outside. They had no intellectual content in it and they shrouded it in a mystery making it seem like some knowledge but it wasn't and it was not read by local people as they were foreigners and it's last form upanishads were added later date and was influenced by Nagarjunas shunyawad.
Ashok not only make bodh temple , he also made jain and hindu temple,
Like in allora cave all cave devided in to hindu ,bodh and jain for 3 all
Thnks सर
Golden age of India gupta era brahmanya dharm
Could you please add english subtitles. It will be more useful
Nice video
Mai prkash best sir 🙏 very nice 👍
sir lagta hain mera network slow hain ap har ek sentence main hang ho rahe ho
Shraman dharm ki sthapna kaise hui,?
I am Monika and my ans - logical question on customs .
Sraman Dharm Sindhu Ghati sabhyata se chal raha hai
Aasthik and nastik
एक प्रश्न का उत्तर कृपया दें, बौद्ध कहते हैं कि सिद्धार्थ ( बुद्ध) से पहले भी बौद्ध धर्म था?!
Buddha means enlightenment. 28th Buddha was Proto Aryan & Proto Dravid Australoid.
बुद्ध का अर्थ है जो बुद्धि( ज्ञान, बोध )को पा लिया।
बुद्ध कोई भी हो सकता है ..।
@@harshikeshlal3949 can you give historical account of these budhas ' the Proto Aryan and Proto Dravidian ' pl
@@HarshGupta-rs4pl Father Suddhodhyan belongs to Shakya tribes married with Koliye tribes.
Ha 24 buddha the
Please use English terms for English medium student
Apko aur jankari ki jarurat hai
Main bhi shraman hu
Watch in 1.5x
Helli sir
क्योंकि आप क्लास चला रहे हैं तो शायद आप मेरे प्रश्न का उत्तर न दें।
It's baman and shraman not any brahman they are bamans also budhist
Student k sath atyachar nhi karo, kam se kam fact to sahi bata do.. Varna ye adhikari bankar akhir kya hi ker lenge, jinhe khud sagi jankari nhi hogi
Kitna slow padha Raha hain tu !
Saale neend aa rahi hain.
Ye kya galat galat padha rahe ho prabhu.. Ye to hadd ho gayi
ब्राह्मणों के पास बुद्धि नहीं थी केवल बौद्धों के पास अक्ल थी।! हा हा
अक्ल थी लेकीन सिर्फ मेहनत करणे वालोन को थगने ने के लिये क्योकी उन्से मेहनत नही होती थी.
Thanku Sir🙏
Thank you so much sir
Shraman dharm ki sthapna kaise hui,?
I am Monika and my ans - logical question on customs .
Shraman religion nhi hai tradition hai jisme non vedic philosophies hoti hai
Sharman dharm nahi tradition hai jo ki non Vedic naastik darshan pe aadharit hai 🙏🏼
Thank you🙏 sir
Thank you so much sir