Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.
Japanese forces destroy Soviet Army Tank Column | Gates of Hell Ostfront
Вставка
- Опубліковано 9 кві 2024
- If you enjoyed the video, drop a LIKE and SUBSCRIBE for more.
🌐Join my discord server: / discord
🛑Support me on Patreon / sturmfuhrerpk
⭐Thumbnail created by dasirishkaiser (DEVIANT-ART)
#gatesofhell #sturmfuhrerpk #gohliberation
your channel is getting better and better
😊
The Japanese had the wrong anti-tank guns, if the battle was intended to be part of the Kalin Gol incident. The standard Japanese anti-tank guns, at the time, were the the 37mm. L.37 Type 92 & 37mm. L.37 Type 94.
According to US range tests, these guns could penetrate up to 45mm. of RHA @ 0 degrees @ 100 yards with APHE and up to 53mm. of RHA @ 0 degrees @ 100 yards with AP solid shot.
I’d be really interested in some non-historical battles, like early war USA vs Russia or late war Germany vs Japan!
Почему не исторические, война США против СССР была в конце войны!
Une très bonne vidéo 🎦 🎬 sur une embuscade de l'armée japonaise 🇯🇵 contre une colonne de l'armée soviétique 🚩.
La fureur des combats est bien retranscrite à l'écran .
⚔️💥💥💥⚔️
Bravo et merci à vous pour la réalisation.
🙏👍🙂😃 ⭐️🥇⭐️
Shocking the Japanese stopped the Soviets, usually it was the other way around, even Soviet light tanks were better tanks than what the Japanese had except some new tanks the Japanese were bringing and developing with 57 and 75mm main guns in 1944 and 45,at this time they only had 37mm on their tanks,The T 26 had a 45mm main gun ,figured with that gun and being fast moving tanks they would of drove behind the Japanese main defenses before they reacted .Stupid AI made the Soviets mingle bunched up at that cross road, target for all the Japanese guns,oh well
Japanese had better tanks in 30s then USSR in battle for khalkin gol they used:
USSR only used BT-5, T-26 and T-28
Japan had Type 95 Ha-Go, Type 89 I-Go, Type 97 Chi-Ha and Type 94 Tankette
Japanese used Type 97 anti tank rifle with rifle which was capable of penetrating around 30-40 mm
Japanese tanks had 37mm cannons, 57mm,
Japanese tanks had a sufficient caliber to destroy all types of USSR tanks used during the Battle of Khalkhin Gol. Only in 1945 did the USSR have better tanks, but in 1939 it was more than equal in quality."
My friend, do you know what I add the equipment for Tank Crew with my old Men Of War Assault Squad 1
By opening inventory of soldiers in editor
Same like before that I added equipmet
I played my old game. Men Of War Assauly Squad 1
SturmfuhrerPK can you I suggest about the Battle of Donetsk in the Donbass War(Russo-Ukrainian war Scenario)?
I have listed some modern battles also. I will make something interesting.
Wait, did the Japanese fought battles against the USSR from that early? I thought the USSR attacked Manchuria practically months before the war would end, in 1945
Читайте про бои на озере Хасан (если я правильно помню) и бои за Халкин-Гол
*Халхин-гол
ฝายบุคต้องปิดรอม ไม่ใช่ไปกองกันอยู่อย่างนั้นก็ฝายเขา กันออก มีศักดิ์ภาพเหนื่อกว่า ไม่ใช้ให้เป็นประโยชน์ 😅😅😅😅
🤓👌
Never could have happened ...just sayin russia dunked on them prior to WW2 pretty straight up no anti armor punch by the IJA
bruh the soviets lost like a thousand men and lots of tanks and armored cars and planes while the Japanese lost just over a hundred men, a few planes and the rest of the Japanese tank force in the battle of kahlkin gol 1939 in the soviet-Mongolia border.
You should know this is a western channel Brodie bro, he’s always gonna make the video against the Soviets losing🤦🏾♂️😂
@@dreykush9554 yeah
@@dreykush9554🫤
@@SturmFuhrerPK 😒
索取
Reality from. The history. Soviet was ambushed Japanise army. 😅
They only were stronger in 45, not earlier
@@jimmcneal5292 Well, of course. Tell this to the Japanese, who were defeated at Khalkingol and Lake Khasan.
@@sergeyserbskiy7122 soviet union lost something like 1.5 times more than japanese at khalkin-gol, and huge amount of tanks.
Upd. Also lost more on lake khasan
@@jimmcneal5292But nevertheless, thanks to the defeat of the Japanese, they decided to expand in the Pacific Ocean, instead of attacking the USSR. In general, the Soviet tactical decisions were quite good, especially with the rush of Japanese defense. If not for this defeat, the Japanese would have continued to produce a huge number of tanks, instead of huge costs for the fleet
@@SimpleHuman-ug8fk it was tactical defeat at best(if it even can be called such). Japan more or less logically decided to not fight USSR since it could not right away win, all while there were basically no discovered resources in the soviet far east back then, especially compared to indonesia and malaya